Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A RAG-Based Multi-Agent LLM System for Natural Hazard Resilience and Adaptation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.17200 v1 pith:MZ5C5DWV submitted 2025-04-24 cs.CL

A RAG-Based Multi-Agent LLM System for Natural Hazard Resilience and Adaptation

classification cs.CL
keywords naturalsystemextremehazardmulti-agentsupportacrossevents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are a transformational capability at the frontier of artificial intelligence and machine learning that can support decision-makers in addressing pressing societal challenges such as extreme natural hazard events. As generalized models, LLMs often struggle to provide context-specific information, particularly in areas requiring specialized knowledge. In this work we propose a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-based multi-agent LLM system to support analysis and decision-making in the context of natural hazards and extreme weather events. As a proof of concept, we present WildfireGPT, a specialized system focused on wildfire hazards. The architecture employs a user-centered, multi-agent design to deliver tailored risk insights across diverse stakeholder groups. By integrating natural hazard and extreme weather projection data, observational datasets, and scientific literature through an RAG framework, the system ensures both the accuracy and contextual relevance of the information it provides. Evaluation across ten expert-led case studies demonstrates that WildfireGPT significantly outperforms existing LLM-based solutions for decision support.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Survey of 112 agentic AI for social good papers reveals moral-geographic asymmetry with 73% lacking geographic context (lowest for SDG 16) and only 25% reporting deployments.

  2. CangLing-KnowFlow: A Unified Knowledge-and-Flow-fused Agent for Comprehensive Remote Sensing Applications

    cs.AI 2025-12 reject novelty 5.0

    CangLing-KnowFlow combines a procedural knowledge base, dynamic workflow repair, and memory to beat ReAct/Reflexion on remote-sensing workflow tasks, but the benchmark is drawn from the same tasks used to build its kn...