REVIEW 2 cited by
Unified attacks to large language model watermarks: spoofing and scrubbing in unauthorized knowledge distillation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Watermarking has emerged as a critical technique for combating misinformation and protecting intellectual property in large language models (LLMs). A recent discovery, termed watermark radioactivity, reveals that watermarks embedded in teacher models can be inherited by student models through knowledge distillation. On the positive side, this inheritance allows for the detection of unauthorized knowledge distillation by identifying watermark traces in student models. However, the robustness of watermarks against scrubbing attacks and their unforgeability in the face of spoofing attacks under unauthorized knowledge distillation remain largely unexplored. Existing watermark attack methods either assume access to model internals or fail to simultaneously support both scrubbing and spoofing attacks. In this work, we propose Contrastive Decoding-Guided Knowledge Distillation (CDG-KD), a unified framework that enables bidirectional attacks under unauthorized knowledge distillation. Our approach employs contrastive decoding to extract corrupted or amplified watermark texts via comparing outputs from the student model and weakly watermarked references, followed by bidirectional distillation to train new student models capable of watermark removal and watermark forgery, respectively. Extensive experiments show that CDG-KD effectively performs attacks while preserving the general performance of the distilled model. Our findings underscore critical need for developing watermarking schemes that are robust and unforgeable.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Construction-Driven Injection: Linguistically-Grounded Edit-Based Code-Mixing Fingerprints for Large Language Models
Pairing a code-mixing fingerprint construction with a cross-lingual alignment injection step lifts post-attack ownership-verification retention by 9–34 points over AlphaEdit.
-
From Construction to Injection: Edit-Based Fingerprints for Large Language Models
A three-stage LLM fingerprinting pipeline (multilingual low-perplexity triggers, edit-based injection with adversarial suppression, and subspace-aware fine-tuning regularization) reports robust and persistent ownershi...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.