Exact S-matrices for higher dimensional representations of generalized Landau-Zener Hamiltonians

S. Malikis; V. Cheianov

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Exact S-matrices for higher dimensional representations of generalized Landau-Zener Hamiltonians

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Lie-algebraic Lax construction yields new exactly solvable six- and eight-dimensional Landau-Zener Hamiltonians, with scattering matrices built from ordered two- and three-level transitions.

desk verdict A useful algebraic repackaging of known Landau-Zener results, but the advertised new 6D/8D models are never actually solved; not ready as is. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.06048 v2 pith:EPMEP6IQ submitted 2025-05-09 quant-ph

S. Malikis , V. Cheianov This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords Landau-Zenermodelexactscatteringmatrixhigher-spinrepresentationszero-curvatureconditionLaxequationbow-tienon-adiabatictransitionsLiealgebra

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the two-level Landau-Zener Hamiltonian, rewritten as a Lax equation, generates a whole tower of higher-spin models whose scattering matrices can be obtained algebraically, and that the same idea extends to generalized bow-tie Hamiltonians once they are paired with a non-Abelian gauge operator satisfying a zero-curvature condition. If correct, the central payoff is a method rather than a single formula: every irreducible representation of the relevant Lie algebra yields an exactly solvable multi-level Landau-Zener problem, without solving the full time-dependent Schrödinger equation or computing Euler angles. The concrete new results are six-dimensional and eight-dimensional Hamiltonians, claimed to be irreducible and outside previously known solvable classes, whose total scattering matrices are ordered products of local two- and three-level Landau-Zener S-matrices.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the zero-curvature/Lax pair. For the spin models, the matrix $\hat V(t)=\sum_i v_i(t)\hat\sigma_i$ obeys $i\dot{\hat V}=[\hat V,\hat H_{\rm LZ}]$, so its eigenvectors evolve under the Landau-Zener unitary, and scattering amplitudes are extracted by projecting time-evolved eigenstates onto the asymptotic eigenstates of $-\hat Z_k$ via Eq. (15). For the bow-tie models, the analogous pair is the Hamiltonian $\hat H(t,\varepsilon)$ together with a translation generator $\hat E$ satisfying $\partial_\varepsilon\hat H-\partial_t\hat E+i[\hat E,\hat H]=0$, which makes the evolution path-independent; the paper chooses a path through crossings at $(\pm R, |a_i|R)$ whose local Hamiltonians are two-level Landau-Zener (or the three-level adjoint model), then multiplies the local S-matrices in the order given by Table I.

What would settle it

Substitute the pair (36)-(37) directly into the zero-curvature expression (23); if it is not identically zero, the model is not integrable in the claimed sense. Independently, numerically integrate the Schrödinger equation for the six-dimensional Hamiltonian (36) over a range of $\Delta/a$ and compare the absolute squares of the full unitary's entries with the ordered product of the local S-matrices from Table I; a systematic mismatch beyond numerical error would disprove the factorization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the Lax equation $i\dot{\hat V}=[\hat V,\hat H]$ turns the original Landau-Zener problem into a representation-theoretic one: in any spin-$(k-1)/2$ representation, the scattering matrix follows from the time-independent eigenvalues of $\hat V$ and the projector formula (15), using only the asymptotic component $v_3=1-2e^{-\pi\Delta^2/a}$. For the generalized bow-tie models, the algebraic structure is carried by a zero-curvature pair $(\hat H,\hat E)$, and by deforming the evolution path to pass through well-separated level crossings, each crossing reduces to a two- or three-level Landau-Zener scattering event, so the total S-matrix is the ordered product of those events. The claimed new models are the six-dimensional Hamiltonian of Eq. (36) and the eight-dimensional adjoint bow-tie Hamiltonian of Appendix II, presented as irreducible representations whose S-matrices factorize in this way.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction assumes that the total scattering matrix of the six-dimensional model equals the ordered product of the local two- and three-level S-matrices listed in Table I, with the crossings acting independently and without interference, and that the pair (36)-(37) actually satisfies the zero-curvature condition (23), which the paper states but does not verify.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any spin-$(k-1)/2$ representation, the scattering matrix can be computed from Eq. (15) using only the asymptotic value $v_3=1-2e^{-\pi\Delta^2/a}$, so exact S-matrices for arbitrary $k$ become available algebraically.
The six- and eight-dimensional bow-tie models, if correct, are new exactly solvable Landau-Zener Hamiltonians outside the previously known classes, with transition probabilities given in closed form as products of exponentials.
The zero-curvature path-deformation argument provides a construction recipe: take an irreducible representation of a Lie algebra, write the Hamiltonian and gauge operator in that representation, identify the crossings, and assemble the S-matrix as an ordered product.
Because only the amplitudes of the unitary operator elements are claimed to matter, the method produces the transition probabilities directly, without requiring the full evolution operator or Euler-angle parametrization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the factorization-by-crossings claim survives direct numerical verification, a natural testable extension is to apply the same representation-theoretic embedding to other known solvable Landau-Zener families, generating new irreducible models and checking their S-matrix products.
The amplitudes-only structure suggests the six- and eight-dimensional S-matrices obey a composition law resembling a no-interference product of local scatterings; the paper does not connect this to existing classifications of solvable multistate Landau-Zener Hamiltonians, but it invites that comparison.
For the eight-dimensional model, the paper gives no crossing table or amplitude derivation in the main text; filling in that table in the same style as Table I and verifying the resulting ordered product would be a concrete, decisive check of the claim.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing to know: this paper is mostly an algebraic re-derivation of already-known Landau-Zener S-matrices. The advertised new 6- and 8-dimensional models are never actually solved; no explicit scattering matrix is given for either, and the step that would get you there—factorizing the total S-matrix into local transitions—is asserted rather than proved.

What it does well: the projector formula (15) cleanly reproduces the spin-1 and spin-3/2 S-matrices, and the Lax/zero-curvature framework gives a unified way to organize known results. The 3-level generalized bow-tie S-matrix (29) is also recovered. For a reader who wants a compact algebraic derivation of these known results, the paper is useful.

The problems are in Section 4 and Appendix II. The pair (H_BT^(6), E_BT^(6)) in Eqs. (36)-(37) is said to satisfy zero-curvature, but this is not demonstrated. Eq. (37) contains an undefined b in the (5,2) entry, which suggests the pair was never checked explicitly. More seriously, the total S-matrix is taken as the ordered product of local probability matrices (Table I crossings 1,2,6,7). Zero-curvature makes the full unitary evolution a product of local unitaries along a deformed path, but it does not make the probability matrix the product of local probability matrices. Levels 2 and 6 appear in more than one crossing, so phases can feed back into off-diagonal probabilities. The manuscript's claim that 'only the amplitudes of the unitary operators elements are sufficient' is exactly the point that needs proof, and it is not given.

The claim that the 6D model is distinct from the 2x3 model in ref. [22] is based on a spectral comparison; as stated, that is not conclusive, but it is a minor point.

Bottom line: the known-model sections are sound and could be useful notes; the new-model sections are unfinished. If the authors can verify the zero-curvature pair and actually compute the 6D/8D S-matrices, the paper would make a decent contribution. As it stands, the central claim is unsupported.

I would not accept this in its current form. But I would send it to a referee rather than desk-reject, because the new Hamiltonians are explicitly written down and the verification is a finite calculation a referee can do. It deserves serious review, with the expectation of major revision.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an algebraic approach to Landau-Zener scattering, first reformulating the two-level model as a Lax equation and then deriving scattering matrices for higher-spin representations through a projector formula. It then applies a zero-curvature, path-deformation method to generalized bow-tie models and claims two new exactly solvable irreducible models: a six-dimensional Hamiltonian (Eq. 36) and an eight-dimensional Hamiltonian (Appendix II). The known-model parts reproduce existing results in the literature; the new-model parts are asserted rather than demonstrated, and no explicit scattering matrix is given for either claimed new model.

Significance. If the claimed new models are correct, they would enlarge the catalogue of exactly solvable multistate Landau-Zener systems beyond previously known classes, which is genuinely interesting. The algebraic treatment of higher-spin representations is a useful presentation, and the projector formula (15) is explicit and efficient; the scattering matrices for the spin-1 and spin-3/2 cases are stated in closed form. However, the central new-model claim is not substantiated: no scattering matrix is written down for the six- or eight-dimensional models, and the factorization assertion on which the solvability claim rests is unproven. The contribution is therefore conditional on substantial additional verification.

major comments (4)

[Section 4, Eqs. (36)-(37) and Eq. (23)] The pair (H_BT^(6), E_BT^(6)) is never checked against the zero-curvature condition (23). This verification is the basis for the claim that the model is integrable; without it, the subsequent path-deformation reasoning has no foundation. The presence of an undefined parameter b in the (5,2) entry of Eq. (37), written as -Delta/b, additionally suggests that the pair was not checked in detail.
[Section 4, Table I and following paragraph] The statement that the total scattering matrix is the ordered product of the local transitions at crossings 1, 2, 6, and 7 is asserted without proof. Zero curvature gives path independence of the unitary evolution operator; it does not imply that the probability matrix P_ij=|U_ij|^2 factorizes as the ordered product of local probability matrices. Since levels 2 and 6 participate in both an early and a late crossing group, relative phases between amplitudes can in principle affect probabilities, and no explicit S-matrix is supplied to rule this out.
[Section 4 and Appendix II] The central claim that the six- and eight-dimensional models have exactly computable scattering matrices is never discharged: no S-matrix, and not even a closed-form expression for the transition probabilities, is given for either model. The paper states that only the amplitudes of the unitary operator elements are sufficient to describe the total scattering, but it does not compute those amplitudes. To support the claim, the authors should either provide the full S-matrix for both models or prove that the factorization is exact despite the repeated participation of levels 2 and 6.
[Section 2, Eq. (21)] As printed, the first-row formula S(N)_{1k} = C(N,k-1) u^{N-k-1} v^{k-1} disagrees with the explicit spin-3/2 matrix in Eq. (20): for N=4 and k=1 it would give u^2 instead of u^3. This appears to be a typo in the exponent, but it should be corrected because Eq. (21) is presented as the observed pattern for the first row.

minor comments (4)

[Section 1, Eq. (5)] The object called S_LZ is a probability matrix rather than a unitary scattering matrix; since later sections compute S_ij = |amplitude|^2, the terminology should be clarified or adjusted for consistency.
[Section 4, Eq. (37)] The symbol K0 is not defined consistently in the matrix: K is defined below the matrix, but K0 appears in the first row without definition. Please define all entries explicitly.
[Section 3, Eq. (35)] The ordering of the product of partial scattering matrices for the N-dimensional bow-tie model is stated without derivation. Since this model was solved previously in Ref. [18], the authors should verify the ordering against the known result or cite the source of the ordering.
[General] The six-dimensional Hamiltonian in Eq. (36) would benefit from a clearer typesetting, as some entries such as 'at+epsilon 0' are ambiguous between at+epsilon and at with a following zero.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's derivations use established Landau-Zener building blocks and external integrability results, with no fitted parameter or self-citation chain standing in for a prediction.

full rationale

The claimed S-matrices for the higher-spin models are obtained from the Lax equation and the trace formula (Eq. 15), using the known two-level Landau-Zener result as input; the spin-1/2 S-matrix is quoted from the standard model, not derived from the higher-spin formulas. The bow-tie S-matrix is assembled as an ordered product of local two-level LZ S-matrices along a deformed path, following the external integrability framework of Refs. [19-21]; those references are not authored by the present paper's authors, and no cited uniqueness theorem is used to force a choice. The 6D and 8D models in Section 4 and Appendix II are claimed to be new, but their S-matrices are never actually written down, and the paper does not verify that E_BT^(6) in Eq. (37) satisfies the zero-curvature condition (23). The statement that 'only the amplitudes of the unitary operators elements are sufficient to describe the total scattering' is an unproven factorization assumption, not a circular reduction: the local transition matrices are not fitted to the target probabilities and do not incorporate the 6D/8D result by definition. The undefined entry containing b in Eq. (37) and the apparent typographical ambiguities in Table I are correctness and verification concerns, not evidence that the claimed output is equivalent to the input. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities; its content is purely algebraic. The load-bearing assumptions are the standard LZ building block, the zero-curvature path-independence principle from prior work, and two paper-specific assertions: the validity of the stated E_BT^(6) pair and the factorization of the scattering matrix for the new models. These latter two are not demonstrated in the text.

assumptions (6)

standard math The two-level Landau-Zener formula (Eq. 5) gives the correct scattering matrix for the fundamental su(2) model.
Taken as an input from the classic Landau-Zener literature (refs. 11-14); it is the building block for all products of local transitions later in the paper.
domain assumption The zero-curvature condition (Eq. 23) guarantees path-independence of the evolution operator.
This is the integrability criterion imported from refs. 19-21 and used throughout Section 3 to deform the integration path.
domain assumption For well-separated level crossings, the total scattering matrix is the ordered product of local two-level and low-dimensional S-matrices.
Used in the N-dimensional bow-tie construction (Eq. 35) and again in Table I for the 6-dimensional model; this factorization is asserted, not proven, in the new-model context.
ad hoc to paper The operator E_BT^(6) in Eq. (37) satisfies the zero-curvature condition with H_BT^(6) in Eq. (36).
Stated without verification; if this pair does not satisfy Eq. (23), the path-deformation argument for the new 6-dimensional model collapses.
ad hoc to paper Only crossings 1, 2, 6, and 7 in Table I contribute non-trivially to the 6-dimensional scattering matrix.
Asserted in Section 4 with a comment that the result is 'almost trivial', but no proof or explicit S-matrix is given to support the claim.
standard math The adjoint-representation solution in Appendix I correctly reproduces the scattering matrix (Eq. 9).
The parabolic cylinder function asymptotic analysis is a standard technique, though the expressions are not fully verified here for readability.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exact S-matrices for higher dimensional representations of generalized Landau-Zener Hamiltonians." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EPMEP6IQ

@misc{pith2026250506048,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exact S-matrices for higher dimensional representations of generalized Landau-Zener Hamiltonians},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EPMEP6IQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.06048}
}

read the original abstract

We explore integrable Landau-Zener-type Hamiltonians through the framework of Lie algebraic structures. By reformulating the classic two-level Landau-Zener model as a Lax equation, we show that higher-spin generalizations lead to exactly solvable scattering matrices, which can be computed efficiently for any higher-spin representation. We further extend this approach to generalized bow-tie Landau-Zener Hamiltonians, employing non-Abelian gauge fields that satisfy a zero-curvature condition to derive their scattering matrices algebraically. This method enables the systematic construction of new exactly solvable multi-level models; as a result, we present previously unknown six-dimensional and eight-dimensional Landau-Zener models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.06048 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Adiabatic spectrum of the generated six-dimensional Hamil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Exact many-body wavefunction of the Kondo model with time-dependent interaction strength
cond-mat.str-el 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The authors derive an exact solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for the Kondo Hamiltonian with a specific time-dependent coupling, using quantum Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[22]

Brundobler and V

S. Brundobler and V . Elser, S-matrix for generalized landau- zener problem, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 26, 1211 (1993)

work page 1993
[1]

Our task is solving the scat- tering problem, i.e

SCA TTERING PROBLEM We start from the two-level Landau-Zener model: ˆHLZ(t) =∆ ˆσ1 +ta ˆσ3 = at∆ ∆−at ,(1) whereσ i’s are the Pauli matrices. Our task is solving the scat- tering problem, i.e. finding the amplitudesc i of the final state: |ψ(t)⟩ = 2 ∑ i=1 ci(t)|i⟩ ,t→∞,(2) given that att 0 =−∞, the system is prepared in one of the eigenstates of ˆH(t0)|0⟩...

arXiv 2025
[2]

First, we exclude trivial embeddings of already known examples into higher- dimensional spaces, since they ultimately are reducible to their original

NEW SOLV ABLE MODELS: NEW SCA TTERING MA TRICES We want to find new (higher-dimensional) Landau-Zener Hamiltonians that are exactly solvable i.e., whose scatter- ing matrix can be attained analytically. First, we exclude trivial embeddings of already known examples into higher- dimensional spaces, since they ultimately are reducible to their original. We ...

work page
[3]

time-independent eigenvalues

work page
[4]

the eigenvectors evolve under the action of ˆULZ (the time ordered exponential generated by the ˆHLZ. Thus, for every|c(t)⟩, eigenvector of ˆV(t): ∃κ(t):R→R, |c(t)⟩ =exp(iκ(t)) ˆULZ(t,t 0)|c(t0)⟩ .(13) In the context of Landau-Zener problems, if the initial eigen- basis of ˆV(t 0)coincides with that of ˆHad, the time-evolved state is the solution of the L...

work page
[5]

In particular, we assume some Hamiltonian ˆH= ˆH(t,ε), whereεis some parameter

BOW TIE MODEL - ZERO CURV A TURE CONDITION An alternative method for acquiring the scattering matrix of certain classes of Landau-Zener Hamiltonians was pre- sented in [21]. In particular, we assume some Hamiltonian ˆH= ˆH(t,ε), whereεis some parameter. We introduce the operator ˆE, the generator of translations alongεdirection: i∂t|ψ(t,ε)⟩ = ˆH|ψ(t,ε)⟩ ,...

work page
[6]

Although the scattering amplitudes were al- ready known from previous work [18], our approach is purely algebraic

HIGHER DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTA TIONS OF BOW-TIE MODELS We have derived the scattering matrix for then-dimensional bow-tie Hamiltonian by using the zero-curvature pair ˆEof the Hamiltonian. Although the scattering amplitudes were al- ready known from previous work [18], our approach is purely algebraic. That is, the pair ˆH(t,ε)and ˆE(t,ε)can be inter- pret...

work page
[7]

Yuen-Zhou, J

J. Yuen-Zhou, J. J. Krich, I. Kassal,et al., Ultrafast spec- troscopy: Quantum information and wave packets, inUltrafast Dynamics at the Nanoscale(Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2017) pp. 455–484

work page 2017

Show all 35 references

[8]

Maiuri, M

M. Maiuri, M. Garavelli, and G. Cerullo, Ultrafast spec- troscopy: State of the art and open challenges, Journal of the American Chemical Society142, 3 (2019)

2019
[9]

Hauke, H

P. Hauke, H. G. Katzgraber, W. Lechner, H. Nishimori, and W. D. Oliver, Perspectives of quantum annealing: Methods and implementations, Reports on Progress in Physics83, 054401 (2020)

2020
[10]

Yarkoni, E

S. Yarkoni, E. Raponi, T. B ¨ack, and S. Schmitt, Quantum an- nealing for industry applications: Introduction and review, Re- ports on Progress in Physics85, 104001 (2022)

2022
[11]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information(Cambridge university press, 2010)

2010
[12]

d’Alessandro,Introduction to quantum control and dynam- ics(Chapman and hall/CRC, 2021)

D. d’Alessandro,Introduction to quantum control and dynam- ics(Chapman and hall/CRC, 2021)

2021
[13]

L. M. Vandersypen and I. L. Chuang, Nmr techniques for quan- tum control and computation, Reviews of modern physics76, 1037 (2004)

2004
[14]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Quantum mechanics: non- relativistic theory, V ol. 3 (Elsevier, 2013)

2013
[15]

Nakamura,Nonadiabatic transition: concepts, basic theo- ries and applications(World Scientific, 2012)

H. Nakamura,Nonadiabatic transition: concepts, basic theo- ries and applications(World Scientific, 2012)

2012
[16]

He, Y .-X

Z.-C. He, Y .-X. Wu, and Z.-Y . Xue, Exact quantum dynam- ics for two-level systems with time-dependent driving, Chinese Physics B33, 120310 (2024)

2024
[17]

Landau, Zur theorie der energieubertragung

L. Landau, Zur theorie der energieubertragung. ii, Physikalis- che Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion2, 46 (1932)

1932
[18]

Zener, Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

C. Zener, Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character137, 696 (1932)

1932
[19]

Majorana, Atomi orientati in campo magnetico variabile, Il Nuovo Cimento (1924-1942)9, 43 (1932)

E. Majorana, Atomi orientati in campo magnetico variabile, Il Nuovo Cimento (1924-1942)9, 43 (1932)

1932
[20]

Stueckelberg, Two-level strong binding approximation, Hel- vetica Physica Acta5, 370 (1932)

E. Stueckelberg, Two-level strong binding approximation, Hel- vetica Physica Acta5, 370 (1932)

1932
[21]

Y . N. Demkov and V . Osherov, Stationary and nonstationary problems in quantum mechanics that can be solved by means of contour integration, Sov. Phys. JETP26, 1 (1968)

1968
[23]

V . N. Ostrovsky and H. Nakamura, Exact analytical solution of the n-level landau-zener-type bow-tie model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General30, 6939 (1997)

1997
[24]

Y . N. Demkov and V . Ostrovsky, The exact solution of the mul- tistate landau-zener type model: the generalized bow-tie model, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 34, 2419 (2001)

2001
[25]

E. A. Yuzbashyan, Integrable time-dependent hamiltonians, solvable landau–zener models and gaudin magnets, Annals of Physics392, 323 (2018)

2018
[26]

Patra and E

A. Patra and E. A. Yuzbashyan, Quantum integrability in the multistate landau–zener problem, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and Theoretical48, 245303 (2015). 7

2015
[27]

N. A. Sinitsyn, E. A. Yuzbashyan, V . Y . Chernyak, A. Patra, and C. Sun, Integrable time-dependent quantum hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 190402 (2018)

2018
[28]

V . Y . Chernyak, N. A. Sinitsyn, and C. Sun, A large class of solvable multistate landau–zener models and quantum integra- bility, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical51, 245201 (2018)

2018
[29]

N. A. Sinitsyn, Multiparticle landau-zener problem: Applica- tion to quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B66, 205303 (2002)

2002
[30]

V . Y . Chernyak, N. A. Sinitsyn, and C. Sun, Multitime landau– zener model: classification of solvable hamiltonians, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53, 185203 (2020)

2020
[31]

R. Hu, F. Li, and C. Sun, Solution to a class of multistate landau-zener model beyond integrability conditions, Physica Scripta99, 065226 (2024)

2024
[32]

Y . B. Band and Y . Avishai, Three-level landau-zener dynamics, Phys. Rev. A99, 032112 (2019)

2019
[33]

S. M. Tchouobiap, M. Kenmoe, and L. Fai, The finite time multi-level su (2) landau–zener problems: exact analytical re- sults, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical48, 395301 (2015)

2015
[34]

Pfeifer and W

W. Pfeifer and W. Pfeifer,The Lie algebras su (N)(Springer, 2003)

2003
[35]

Abramowitz and I

M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,Handbook of mathemati- cal functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, V ol. 55 (US Government printing office, 1948). APPENDIX I: The solution of adjoint The solution of Schr¨odinger equation for theH ad(t)Eq. (8): c1(t) =c 1D− i∆2...

1948

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [22]

Brundobler and V

S. Brundobler and V . Elser, S-matrix for generalized landau- zener problem, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 26, 1211 (1993)

work page 1993

[2] [1]

Our task is solving the scat- tering problem, i.e

SCA TTERING PROBLEM We start from the two-level Landau-Zener model: ˆHLZ(t) =∆ ˆσ1 +ta ˆσ3 = at∆ ∆−at ,(1) whereσ i’s are the Pauli matrices. Our task is solving the scat- tering problem, i.e. finding the amplitudesc i of the final state: |ψ(t)⟩ = 2 ∑ i=1 ci(t)|i⟩ ,t→∞,(2) given that att 0 =−∞, the system is prepared in one of the eigenstates of ˆH(t0)|0⟩...

arXiv 2025

[3] [2]

First, we exclude trivial embeddings of already known examples into higher- dimensional spaces, since they ultimately are reducible to their original

NEW SOLV ABLE MODELS: NEW SCA TTERING MA TRICES We want to find new (higher-dimensional) Landau-Zener Hamiltonians that are exactly solvable i.e., whose scatter- ing matrix can be attained analytically. First, we exclude trivial embeddings of already known examples into higher- dimensional spaces, since they ultimately are reducible to their original. We ...

work page

[4] [3]

time-independent eigenvalues

work page

[5] [4]

the eigenvectors evolve under the action of ˆULZ (the time ordered exponential generated by the ˆHLZ. Thus, for every|c(t)⟩, eigenvector of ˆV(t): ∃κ(t):R→R, |c(t)⟩ =exp(iκ(t)) ˆULZ(t,t 0)|c(t0)⟩ .(13) In the context of Landau-Zener problems, if the initial eigen- basis of ˆV(t 0)coincides with that of ˆHad, the time-evolved state is the solution of the L...

work page

[6] [5]

In particular, we assume some Hamiltonian ˆH= ˆH(t,ε), whereεis some parameter

BOW TIE MODEL - ZERO CURV A TURE CONDITION An alternative method for acquiring the scattering matrix of certain classes of Landau-Zener Hamiltonians was pre- sented in [21]. In particular, we assume some Hamiltonian ˆH= ˆH(t,ε), whereεis some parameter. We introduce the operator ˆE, the generator of translations alongεdirection: i∂t|ψ(t,ε)⟩ = ˆH|ψ(t,ε)⟩ ,...

work page

[7] [6]

Although the scattering amplitudes were al- ready known from previous work [18], our approach is purely algebraic

HIGHER DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTA TIONS OF BOW-TIE MODELS We have derived the scattering matrix for then-dimensional bow-tie Hamiltonian by using the zero-curvature pair ˆEof the Hamiltonian. Although the scattering amplitudes were al- ready known from previous work [18], our approach is purely algebraic. That is, the pair ˆH(t,ε)and ˆE(t,ε)can be inter- pret...

work page

[8] [7]

Yuen-Zhou, J

J. Yuen-Zhou, J. J. Krich, I. Kassal,et al., Ultrafast spec- troscopy: Quantum information and wave packets, inUltrafast Dynamics at the Nanoscale(Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2017) pp. 455–484

work page 2017