Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Effective Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.17218 v1 pith:3PD4QSV2 submitted 2025-05-22 cs.AI

Effective Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Language Models

classification cs.AI
keywords reasoningaccuracycomputationalmodelssmallalgorithmalgorithmsbatch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising strategy for improving the reasoning capabilities of language models (LMs) in domains such as mathematics and coding. However, most modern RL algorithms were designed to target robotics applications, which differ significantly from LM reasoning. We analyze RL algorithm design decisions for LM reasoning, for both accuracy and computational efficiency, focusing on relatively small models due to computational constraints. Our findings are: (i) on-policy RL significantly outperforms supervised fine-tuning (SFT), (ii) PPO-based off-policy updates increase accuracy instead of reduce variance, and (iii) removing KL divergence can lead to more concise generations and higher accuracy. Furthermore, we find that a key bottleneck to computational efficiency is that the optimal batch sizes for inference and backpropagation are different. We propose a novel algorithm, DASH, that performs preemptive sampling (i.e., sample a large batch and accumulate gradient updates in small increments), and gradient filtering (i.e., drop samples with small advantage estimates). We show that DASH reduces training time by 83% compared to a standard implementation of GRPO without sacrificing accuracy. Our findings provide valuable insights on designing effective RL algorithms for LM reasoning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PS-PPO: Prefix-Sampling PPO for Critic-Free RLHF

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    PS-PPO samples a per-trajectory cutoff and importance-weights truncated gradients, preserving the full critic-free update in expectation while cutting RLHF training compute and memory.

  2. SLPO: Scaling Latent Reasoning via a Surrogate Policy

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    SLPO adds a surrogate Gaussian policy and a learnable stopping gate so that outcome-reward RL can improve latent (continuous-vector) reasoning, raising Pass@8/16 in all 12 tested settings.

  3. PS-PPO: Prefix-Sampling PPO for Critic-Free RLHF

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PS-PPO samples prefixes of trajectories in critic-free RLHF and uses importance-weighted updates to reduce compute and memory while claiming to preserve the full-trajectory objective.