Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

BINGO! Simple Optimizers Win Big if Problems Collapse to a Few Buckets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.04509 v1 pith:PQPK5WDC submitted 2025-06-04 cs.SE

BINGO! Simple Optimizers Win Big if Problems Collapse to a Few Buckets

classification cs.SE
keywords bingodataoptimizationsimplebucketscomplexeffectmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Traditional multi-objective optimization in software engineering (SE) can be slow and complex. This paper introduces the BINGO effect: a novel phenomenon where SE data surprisingly collapses into a tiny fraction of possible solution "buckets" (e.g., only 100 used from 4,096 expected). We show the BINGO effect's prevalence across 39 optimization in SE problems. Exploiting this, we optimize 10,000 times faster than state-of-the-art methods, with comparable effectiveness. Our new algorithms (LITE and LINE), demonstrate that simple stochastic selection can match complex optimizers like DEHB. This work explains why simple methods succeed in SE-real data occupies a small corner of possibilities-and guides when to apply them, challenging the need for CPU-heavy optimization. Our data and code are public at GitHub (see anon-artifacts/bingo).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When to Use Which? Benchmarking Optimisers for Configurable Systems under Varying Budgets

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Across 22 configurable systems and budgets from 100 to 10,000 evaluations, FLASH is the most consistently effective optimiser, while GA and IRACE catch up only at large budgets.