Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 150 references

A survey of The Prouhet-Tarry-Escott Problem and its Generalizations

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Three new generalizations of the Girard-Newton identities make the classic equal-sums-of-like-powers problem systematically solvable.

desk verdict A useful survey and numerical catalog fronted by an unproved identity that Chapter 5 leans on as a theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11429 v1 pith:BMF3HDEV submitted 2025-06-13 math.NT

Chen Shuwen This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NT MSC 11D0911D2511D41
keywords Prouhet-Tarry-EscottproblemEqualsumsoflikepowersGirard-NewtonidentitiesDiophantineequationMultigradechainsGeneralizedPTENormalizedGPTEIdealsolutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem — two distinct sets of integers with equal sums of like powers — and its two generalizations can be handled by three new algebraic tools derived from the classical Girard-Newton identities. The first tool extends the identities to all integer exponents, including negative powers and the equal-products case $k=0$; the second packages them into determinants that are claimed to equal the product of all pairwise differences between the two sets; the third handles odd exponents. The paper also introduces a normalized version of the generalized problem, scaled so the largest entry is $1$, and states six conjectures giving exact upper and lower bounds for every variable one by one, which the author reports using to accelerate computer searches for ideal solutions. A sympathetic reader would care because, if the identities and the bounds hold, entire families of these classical Diophantine problems become routinely searchable, and the paper offers what it describes as the most complete census to date: 296 types of generalized and Fermat-form problems with ideal solutions. The paper is candid that complete proofs of the identities and conjectures are not yet given; the supporting evidence is symbolic verification in Mathematica for small parameter values and agreement with known solutions.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the determinant family of Identity 4. For $n$ numbers $a_i$ and $m$ numbers $b_j$ one forms the power-sum differences $P_k$, with $P_0$ defined as $-\prod_j b_j/\prod_i a_i$, builds an auxiliary sequence $T_k$ by the Newton recursion on both positive and negative indices, and then forms determinants $W_{nk+r}$ whose rows are consecutive shifts of the sequence $S_k$; their defining property is $W_{nm}=\prod_{i=1}^{n}\prod_{j=1}^{m}(a_i-b_j)$ and $W_{nk+r}=e_r(a_1,\dots,a_n)\,W_{nk}$, where $e_r$ is the $r$-th elementary symmetric sum. Since an ideal solution forces the full difference product to vanish, the identity converts equalities of power sums into the statement that certain ratios $W_{nk+r}/W_{nk}$ are small integers with alternating signs; a search loop tests candidates by these ratio checks and aborts the moment a ratio is not an integer, which the paper reports being much faster than checking the power sums directly. Identity 3 ($T_k=0$ for all integer $k$) does the complementary work of excluding whole exponent sets, and Identity 5 supplies the odd-exponent analogue. The second engine is the normalized-GPTE framework of Chapter 5: after scaling the largest entry to $1$, six conjectures assert that the two ordered sets interlace and that exact bounds for $\beta_{n+1}$, then $\beta_n$, then $\alpha_n$, and so on, come from collapsing adjacent equalities, which prunes the search tree to a narrow slab around the conjectured bounds.

What would settle it

The concrete test is a direct spot-check of Identity 4 outside the small cases the paper says it verified symbolically: choose $n=4$, $m=5$, include several negative exponents and the zero-exponent definition of $P_0$, pick random integer tuples with no zero entries and no coincidences $a_i=b_j$, and check numerically whether $W_{20}=\prod_{i=1}^{4}\prod_{j=1}^{5}(a_i-b_j)$; one mismatch falsifies the identity as stated, and a pattern of mismatches at zero entries would reveal the missing restriction. A second test targets the search engine itself: recompute the polynomial for $\beta_{6,\min}$ of type $(k=1,2,3,4,6)$ exactly as in Example 5.2 by applying Identity 4, and compare its root to a high-precision numerical solution of the collapsed system (5.27); any discrepancy between the two routes refutes the bound conjecture that the search algorithm relies on.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that three generalizations of the Girard-Newton identities, stated as Identity 3, Identity 4, and Identity 5, form a valid and effective algebraic engine for the PTE, GPTE, and FPTE problems. Identity 3 asserts that a recursively defined sequence $T_k$ attached to $n$ numbers vanishes for every integer $k$, from which the paper derives that certain exponent sets, for example $(h=0,1,2,3,4,5)$ and $(h=-1,0,1,2,3,4)$, have no nontrivial real or integer solutions, and that other systems force structural constraints such as zero sums or zero reciprocal sums. Identity 4 asserts that a family of determinants $W_{nk+r}$ built from power-sum differences satisfies $W_{nm}=\prod_{i=1}^{n}\prod_{j=1}^{m}(a_i-b_j)$, with the neighbouring determinants $W_{nk+1}, \dots, W_{nk+n}$ equal to the elementary symmetric sums of the $a_i$ times $W_{nk}$; the paper reports that this turns the search for ideal solutions into divisibility tests on ratios of determinants, and it recounts finding the smallest known non-symmetric ideal solution of degree 7 this way. Identity 5 gives an analogous determinant calculus for odd exponents, used to locate solutions of types such as $(k=1,3,5,7,9)$ and $(k=1,2,3,5,7,9)$. The paper further claims that ideal solutions of three series of GPTE types carry a constant $C$ equal to the difference of the two associated monic polynomials, and that the normalized GPTE problem satisfies six conjectures determining exact bounds for each variable in descending order; under these conjectures the extreme configurations collapse adjacent variables, and the paper derives polynomial equations for the minimal largest element $\beta_{n+1,\min}$ for a range of exponent sets. On its own terms the paper is as much a research programme as a survey: its appendices catalogue 296 types with ideal solutions, many of which it says were located with the methods it introduces.

Load-bearing premise

The whole method stands on the assumption that the determinant identity $W_{nm}=\prod_{i,j}(a_i-b_j)$ holds with no hidden exceptions for every choice of set sizes $n$ and $m$ and every integer exponent $k$, including the negative and zero powers used to derive the exact bounds in Chapter 5; if that identity fails in some excluded case, the claimed bounds and the fast computer search built on them collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Searches for ideal solutions scale to exponent sets beyond the tabulated ones, because the determinant-ratio divisibility test lets a computer discard a candidate tuple on the first non-integer ratio instead of computing and comparing the full power sums.
  • Existence questions for specific GPTE types become decidable in many cases: the corollaries drawn from Identity 3 already show that types such as $(h=0,1,2,3,4,5)$ and $(h=0,1,4)$ have no nontrivial solutions, and the same method extends the list.
  • The chain-length trichotomy (no chain, bounded finite chain, or unbounded chain) becomes computable type by type, because the identities bound how many distinct real tuples can share a fixed set of power sums, as the paper demonstrates for types $(h=1,3,4)$ and $(h=2,3,4)$.
  • The trigonometric identities supply a systematic source of integer solutions whose element ratios approach the sine-squared lower bound $\beta_{n+1,\min}=\sin^2(n\pi/(2n+2))$ for the PTE case, linking the continuous and discrete sides of the problem.
  • If the six normalized-GPTE conjectures are correct, then for each exponent set the minimal ideal solution is characterized by the collapsed extreme configuration of Conjecture 2, which would certify the minimality of the appendix solutions and set a target for exhaustive searches.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable consequence the paper leaves implicit: the same collapse construction that fixes $\beta_{n+1,\min}$ should also produce the successive bounds for $\beta_n$ and $\alpha_n$, so the polynomials of Example 5.2 and its neighbours for neighbouring exponent sets should be algebraically related; checking how those polynomials factor and relate would map the adjacency structure of the GPTE solut
  • The trigonometric and algebraic sides of the paper could be welded together: the classical alternating cosine-sum identities behind Identity 12 are standard consequences of root-of-unity spectral arguments, so a proof of Identity 12 along those lines would presumably also settle the small cases of Identities 3–5, which the paper at present supports only by symbolic checks for small parameters.
  • The constant $C$ viewpoint suggests a reformulation of the search as a problem about integer polynomials of bounded height: an ideal solution exists exactly when two monic polynomials with integer roots differ by a constant polynomial, a finitary condition with a finite search space that would also explain why the observed constants factor into the small primes seen in Chapter 3.
  • The reported speed-ups, for example thirty minutes to find the first known solution of type $(k=1,2,3,5,7,9)$ after restricting to odd integers, suggest that the bound conjectures carry real computational weight; a clean test would be to rerun a known search without the conjectured bounds and measure how much the search space grows, isolating the contribution of the conjectures from that of the de
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey of the Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem, its generalized forms (GPTE and FPTE), multigrade chains, and trigonometric extensions. Its central new mathematical content consists of three generalizations of the Girard-Newton identities (Identities 3, 4, and 5), a set of constant identities (Identities 6--9), trigonometric identities (Identities 10--14), and a normalized GPTE framework with six conjectures giving claimed exact bounds for every normalized variable, proposed as a tool for accelerating computer searches. A large appendix catalogs 296 types of ideal GPTE and FPTE solutions, and a reference search program is described.

Significance. If the three generalized Girard-Newton identities and the six normalized-GPTE conjectures were proved, the manuscript would make a substantial contribution to the PTE/GPTE literature: it would provide new structural tools, a systematic bound framework that could accelerate searches, and a large organized catalog of ideal solutions. The survey portions and the extensive appendix have independent utility as a reference. The paper is also commendable for including explicit numerical examples, Mathematica verification statements, and reference code. However, the load-bearing new results are explicitly unproved, and both the exact-bound claims and the search-acceleration method rest on them, so the mathematical claims as currently presented are not yet established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2.2 and Example 5.2] Identity 4, stated in Section 2.2.2 as holding for all positive integers n and m and all integers k, is used as an established fact in Chapter 5, although the text says 'It is challenging for us to fully prove Identity 4' and only Mathematica checks for small n are provided. In Example 5.2, the derivation of the polynomial (5.30) for the exact lower bound beta_6,min proceeds by asserting that the determinants (5.34) and (5.35) vanish 'according to Identity 4'. Because the same method is used in Examples 5.3 through 5.6, including cases with k=0 and negative k, a hidden restriction or failure of Identity 4 in any of these regimes would make the claimed exact bounds incorrect rather than merely unproved. This is load-bearing for the central claim of Chapter 5, so Identity 4 must either be proved or re-stated with precise hypotheses and an independent verification for every regime used afterward.
  2. [Section 2.2.1 and Chapter 3] Identity 3 is also explicitly unproved, yet it is used to derive the constant identities in Chapter 3 and to justify several 'no nontrivial solution' corollaries such as Corollaries 2.8 and 2.9. The paper states, 'At present, we are unable to provide a complete mathematical proof for Identity 3.' A derivation that relies on an unproved identity should be marked as conditional, and the corollaries that exclude the existence of solutions should be labeled as conditional statements until a proof is supplied. In particular, the proof ideas for Corollaries 2.10 and 2.11 depend on the validity of (2.98), which is a special case of Identity 3.
  3. [Section 5.1 and Section 5.2] The six conjectures in Chapter 5 are used to define the 'exact bounds' of the normalized GPTE system and to derive the search acceleration described in Chapter 6, but the paper does not prove attainability or infimum status of the collapsed configurations in Conjecture 2. The positive infinitesimal epsilon_1 is introduced in (5.22) and later replaced numerically by 10^-50 in Examples 5.4--5.6; the paper does not justify that the limit as epsilon_1 tends to 0 is the actual lower bound for integer solutions, nor whether the bound is attained or only approached. The statements would be cleaner if the paper distinguished rigorously between the infimum of the normalization and the minimum over integer solutions, and if it stated exactly which claims are conditional on the conjectures.
  4. [Chapter 6 and the search algorithm] The search algorithm in Chapter 6 is presented as a method for finding ideal non-negative integer solutions, but its completeness claim depends on the unproved bounds conjectures. If only some of the conjectures hold, the algorithm still finds a subset of solutions, yet the exposition repeatedly refers to 'exact bounds' and 'the theoretical lower bound' (for example, equations (5.29)-(5.30)) without indicating that these values are conditional. Section 5.2 should explicitly separate the conditional derivation of the bounds from any unconditional verification of the resulting solutions, and the description of the search algorithm should state that it is heuristic with respect to completeness unless the conjectures are proved.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2.2, Example 2.10] In equation (2.151), the last displayed identity reads 'W12 = (a1a2) · W12', which is self-referential and cannot be correct; it should presumably read 'W12 = (a1a2) · W10'. Please correct this typo.
  2. [Throughout] The text contains several small language and typographical errors, including 'For for all positive integers k' in Example 2.3, 'Exapmle' in Example 2.5's header reference, and 'by applying Identity 4' in Example 5.2 where the identity is unproved; a careful editing pass would improve readability.
  3. [Chapter 2, discussion of Identity 5] The statement of the third generalization, Identity 5, is complex and is said to be verified only 'by using Mathematica for a certain smaller n'; a precise statement of the range of n for which it is known to hold, and for which it is only conjectured, would help the reader use the many examples in Section 2.2.3.
  4. [Appendix and references] The appendix is extremely long and is presented as a 'Collection of ideal numerical solutions' with cross-references, but there is no explicit statement of which entries were independently verified and which are taken from the author's prior work; adding a verification column or a provenance note would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's unproved identities and conjectures are transparently labeled as such; conditionality is a correctness risk, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular in the sense defined here. The generalized Girard-Newton identities (Identity 3, Identity 4, Identity 5) are stated as unproved assertions with only Mathematica checks for small cases: 'It is challenging for us to fully prove Identity 4' and 'Identity 5 has not been proved completely.' These are explicit limitations, not hidden inputs disguised as outputs. Likewise, the exact bounds in Chapter 5 are honestly presented as conjectures: 'At present, we are unable to provide strict proofs for these bounds. Thus, the following section proposes these bounds as conjectures.' The computation of β6,min in Example 5.2 is conditional on Conjecture 2's ansatz (5.22) and on Identity 4; it is not a case of fitting a parameter to data and then renaming it a prediction. Numerical solutions cited nearby are independently checkable integer identities, and the paper explicitly says solutions found under the conjectures are conditional ('based on the assumption that these conjectures hold... even if the conjectures are only partially valid, the resulting boundary conditions would still yield a subset of ideal solutions'). Self-citations to the author's prior papers establish provenance of the identities and solutions, but the mathematical statements are reproduced in the manuscript rather than being justified only by the citation. The main concerns—unproved identities, unproved conjectures, and reliance on Mathematica verification—are correctness/completeness risks, not circularity. No equation reduces to its own input by construction, and no fitted value is relabeled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The computational framework of the paper rests on at least three unproved generalized identities, five or more unproved trigonometric identities, and six unproved conjectures. All are openly labeled as unproved in the text, but they are load-bearing for the claimed exact bounds and search-speed improvements. The numerical catalog itself is independent of these assumptions and can be checked directly.

free parameters (1)
  • epsilon_1 (positive infinitesimal) = 10^-50 (in numerical examples)
    Introduced in Conjecture 2 and Examples 5.4-5.6 as the smallest normalized element in certain extremal configurations. It is chosen by hand to make the numerical solving tractable and is then eliminated in the limit, so it functions as a hand-chosen computational parameter rather than a fitted physical constant.
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Identity 3 (First Generalization of Girard-Newton): T_k = 0 for all integer k.
    Stated in Section 2.2.1 with the explicit admission that no complete mathematical proof is available; only Mathematica checks for small n and k are offered. The identity is load-bearing for the constant-C formulas and for solving GPTE types with non-positive exponents.
  • ad hoc to paper Identity 4 (Second Generalization): W_nm = product over all (a_i - b_j), with the stated negative-power and k=0 extensions.
    Introduced in Section 2.2.2, where the text says 'It is challenging for us to fully prove Identity 4.' It is used directly in Chapter 5 to derive the exact lower bounds of beta variables, so the bounds collapse if this identity fails.
  • ad hoc to paper Identity 5 (Third Generalization for odd exponents): the determinant identities for odd-power sums hold.
    Presented in Section 2.2.3 with the statement 'Identity 5 has not been proved completely.' It is used to analyze odd-exponent GPTE and PTE solutions, including searches for ideal symmetric solutions.
  • ad hoc to paper Identities 10-14 (trigonometric PTE/GPTE identities) hold as stated.
    Chapter 4 states these identities without complete proofs, with remarks such as 'we have not yet provided a complete proof, but it has been verified through millions of numerical solutions.' They are used to generate trigonometric solutions and to support the beta_{n+1} lower-bound formula for the PTE case.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture 1 (Interlacing Conjecture): normalized GPTE solutions interlace in the described pattern.
    Stated in Section 5.1 without proof. It is the basis for Corollary 5.1 and for the special collapsed configurations used to compute the exact bounds of beta_{n+1} in Section 5.2.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture 2 and the remaining five bounds conjectures: exact bounds for every normalized variable exist and are attained at the stated collapsed configurations.
    Section 5.2 explicitly says 'we are unable to provide strict proofs for these bounds' and proposes them as conjectures. These conjectures are the core of the claimed search-efficiency improvement in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A survey of The Prouhet-Tarry-Escott Problem and its Generalizations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BMF3HDEV

@misc{pith2026250611429,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A survey of The Prouhet-Tarry-Escott Problem and its Generalizations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BMF3HDEV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11429}
}
abstract

This paper explores the Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem (PTE), the Generalized PTE problem (GPTE), and the Fermat form of Generalized PTE problem (FPTE). The GPTE problem extends the PTE problem by allowing different sets of exponents, while the FPTE problem considers cases where the number of integers in the two sets differs by one. Multigrade chains are also investigated, involving multiple sets of integers satisfying the GPTE system. The study of PTE and GPTE problems is further extended from integers to trigonometric functions. Three novel generalizations of the Girard-Newton Identities are introduced to solve the PTE and GPTE problems: the first extends the domain of exponents to all integers; the second further generalizes to a broader form; and the third focuses on odd integer exponents. The constant $C$ in the PTE and GPTE problems is investigated, and a novel approach is proposed by introducing the normalized GPTE problem with six conjectures to determine bounds for each variable. This enhances the efficiency of computer searches for ideal non-negative integer solutions that satisfy $\sum_{i=1}^{n+1} a_i^k = \sum_{i=1}^{n+1} b_i^k$ for $k = k_1, k_2, \dots, k_n$. A general process of computer searches for GPTE solutions is discussed, and reference code for the search program is provided. Several parametric solutions for GPTE are presented, along with parametric methods for ideal prime solutions. Six open problems related to the PTE and GPTE problems are proposed, and three approaches to address these problems are suggested. In the appendix, an overview of the research status is provided for the 296 types of GPTE and FPTE that have ideal solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alpers and R

    A. Alpers and R. Tijdeman. The two-dimensional Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem. J. Number Theory, 123(2):403–412, 2007. MR2301222

    2007

  2. [2]

    Barrodale

    I. Barrodale. A note on equal sums of like powers.Math. Comp., 20(1966), 318–322

    1966

  3. [3]

    Beiler.Recreations in the Theory of Numbers

    Albert H. Beiler.Recreations in the Theory of Numbers. Dover, 1964, p. 163. A.1.5

    1964

  4. [4]

    Bernstein

    Daniel J. Bernstein. Enumerating solutions to p(a) + q(b) = r(c) + s(d). Math. Comp., 70(234):389–394, 2001. A.1.4

    2001

  5. [5]

    Borwein and C

    P. Borwein and C. Ingalls. The Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem revisited. Enseign. Math. (2), 40(1–2):3–27, 1994. MR1279058 1.1, 1, 3.1, 5.1

    1994

  6. [6]

    P. Borwein. Computational Excursions in Analysis and Number Theory. Vol. 10 ofCMS Books in Math., Springer, New York, 2002. MR1912495

    2002

  7. [7]

    Computationalinvestigationsofthe Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem

    P.Borwein, P.Lisoněk, andC.Percival. Computationalinvestigationsofthe Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem. Math. Comp., 72(244):2063–2070, 2003. MR1986822 3, 3.1, 6, 6.2, A.1.27, A.1.41

    2003

  8. [8]

    New upper bounds for taxicab and cabtaxi numbers.J

    Christian Boyer. New upper bounds for taxicab and cabtaxi numbers.J. Integer Seq., 11(8):Article 08.1.6, 2008. A.1.3

    2008

Show all 150 references
  1. [9]

    New Upper Bounds for Taxicab and Cabtaxi Numbers

    Christian Boyer. New Upper Bounds for Taxicab and Cabtaxi Numbers. http://www.christianboyer.com/taxicab/ A.1.3

  2. [10]

    A geometric approach to equal sums of sixth powers

    Andrew Bremner. A geometric approach to equal sums of sixth powers. Proc. London Math. Soc., 43(1981), 544–581. A.1.11

    1981

  3. [11]

    Andrew Bremner and R. K. Guy. A dozen difficult Diophantine dilemmas. Amer. Math. Monthly, 1988, 31–36

    1988

  4. [12]

    Broadhurst

    D. Broadhurst. A new Prouhet–Tarry–Escott solution.NMBRTHRY list- serv, 26 September 2007. A.1.34, A.1.42

    2007

  5. [13]

    Broadhurst

    D. Broadhurst. A Chinese Prouhet–Tarry–Escott solution. http://physics.open.ac.uk/~dbroadhu/cpte.pdf, 2007. A.1.34, A.1.42

    2007

  6. [14]

    Some new results on equal sums of like powers

    Simcha Brundo. Some new results on equal sums of like powers. Math. Comp., 23(1969), 877–880. A.1.11

    1969

  7. [15]

    On generating infinitely many solutions of the Diophantine equation A6 + B6 + C6 = D6 + E6 + F 6

    Simcha Brundo. On generating infinitely many solutions of the Diophantine equation A6 + B6 + C6 = D6 + E6 + F 6. Math. Comp., 24(1970), 453–454. A.1.11

    1970

  8. [16]

    Equal sums of sixth powers

    Simcha Brundo and Irving Kaplansky. Equal sums of sixth powers. J. Number Theory, 6(1974), 401–403. A.1.11 359

    1974

  9. [17]

    Triples of sixth powers with equal sums.Math

    Simcha Brundo. Triples of sixth powers with equal sums.Math. Comp., 30(1976), 646–648. A.1.11

    1976

  10. [18]

    Magic Square

    J. L. Burchnall and T. W. Chaundy. A type of “Magic Square” in Tarry’s problem. Quart. J. Math., 8(1937), 119–130. A.1.21

    1937

  11. [19]

    T. Caley. The Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem. Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, 2012. 2.1.1, 3.1, 5.1, 6, 6.2

    2012

  12. [20]

    T. Caley. The Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem for Gaussian integers.Math. Comp., 82(282):1121–1137, 2013. MR3008852 2.1.1

    2013

  13. [21]

    The Prime Puzzles & Problem Connection

    Carlos Rivera. The Prime Puzzles & Problem Connection. http://www. primepuzzles.net/puzzles/puzz_065.htm. 1.2.3, A.1.5, A.1.12, A.1.12, A.1.28, A.1.38

  14. [22]

    Chamberland

    M. Chamberland. Ramanujan’s 6–8–10 Equation and Beyond.Mathemat- ics Magazine, 82(2):135–140, 2009.https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X. 2009.11953609 2.2.2

    2009 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Extensions of an amazing identity of Ramanujan.Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, 50(4):1253–1275, 2020

    Kwang-Wu Chen. Extensions of an amazing identity of Ramanujan.Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, 50(4):1253–1275, 2020. 7.1

    2020

  16. [24]

    Equal sums of like powers.http://euler.free.fr/eslp/ eslp.htm, 2001

    Chen Shuwen. Equal sums of like powers.http://euler.free.fr/eslp/ eslp.htm, 2001. A.1.6, A.1.7, A.1.10, A.1.13, A.1.14, A.1.15, A.1.16, A.1.17, A.1.18, A.1.19, A.1.22, A.1.23, A.1.25, A.1.29, A.1.31, A.1.32, A.1.33, A.1.35, A.1.36, A.1.38, A.1.39, B.1.2, B.1.5, B.1.6, B.1.8, B...

    2001

  17. [25]

    Multigrade Chains

    Chen Shuwen. Multigrade Chains. http://eslpower.org/chains.htm,

  18. [26]

    Algebraic Identities.http://eslpower.org/Identity.htm,

    Chen Shuwen. Algebraic Identities.http://eslpower.org/Identity.htm,

  19. [27]

    Chen Shuwen’s Notebooks (Part I), 1st Edition, Ver.20210816 http://eslpower.org/Notebook.htm, 2021

    Chen Shuwen. Chen Shuwen’s Notebooks (Part I), 1st Edition, Ver.20210816 http://eslpower.org/Notebook.htm, 2021. 2, 2.1.2, 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.2.1, 4.2.2

    2021

  20. [28]

    Chen Shuwen’s Notebooks (In Chinese) https://www

    Chen Shuwen. Chen Shuwen’s Notebooks (In Chinese) https://www. zhihu.com/column/c_1411069086210625537, 2021-2025. 1.3, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 4.3, 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 7.1, 7.1, 7.1, 7.2, A.1.8, A.1.9, A.1.14, A.1.16

    2021

  21. [29]

    The Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem

    Chen Shuwen. The Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem. http://eslpower. org/TarryPrb.htm, 2022. 1.1.2, A.1.34, A.1.42

    2022

  22. [30]

    Equalsumsoflikepowers

    ChenShuwen. Equalsumsoflikepowers. http://eslpower.org/eslp.htm,

  23. [31]

    Equal Products and Equal Sums of Like Powers http: //eslpower.org/product.htm, 2023

    Chen Shuwen. Equal Products and Equal Sums of Like Powers http: //eslpower.org/product.htm, 2023. 1.2, 1.2.1, 3.2, A.3.6, A.3.7, A.3.8, A.3.9, A.3.10, A.3.11, A.3.12, A.3.13, A.3.14, A.3.15, A.3.16, A.3.17, A.3.18, A.3.19, A.3.20, A.3.21, A.3.22, A.3.23, A.3.24, B.3.1, B.3.2, ...

    2023

  24. [32]

    Ideal positive integer solutions of k < 0 case

    Chen Shuwen. Ideal positive integer solutions of k < 0 case. http: //eslpower.org/kminus.htm, 2023. 1.2, 1.2.1, A.5.1, A.5.2, A.5.3, A.5.4, A.5.5, A.5.6, A.5.7, A.5.8, A.5.9, A.5.10, A.5.11, A.5.12, A.5.13, A.5.14, A.5.15, A.5.16, A.5.17, A.5.18, A.5.19, A.5.20, A.5.21, A.5.22...

    2023

  25. [33]

    Ideal integer solutions of h < 0 case

    Chen Shuwen. Ideal integer solutions of h < 0 case. http://eslpower. org/hminus.htm, 2023. 7.1, 7.1, B.5.1, B.5.5, B.5.6, B.5.7, B.5.9, B.5.11, B.5.12, B.5.18, B.5.20, B.5.21

    2023

  26. [34]

    On the Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem

    Yingqiong Chen. On the Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem. Master’s Thesis, Southwest University, 2018. 6, 6.2

    2018

  27. [35]

    Chernick

    J. Chernick. Ideal solutions of the Tarry–Escott problem. Amer. Math. Monthly, 44(10):626–633, 1937. A.1.12, A.1.20, A.1.21, A.1.35, A.1.38

    1937

  28. [36]

    Symmetric Diophantine systems.Acta Arith., 59(3):291– 307, 1991

    Ajai Choudhry. Symmetric Diophantine systems.Acta Arith., 59(3):291– 307, 1991. 7.1, A.1.9, A.1.17, B.1.3, B.3.1

    1991

  29. [37]

    The Diophantine systemP xr i = P yr i, r = 1, 3, 5

    Ajai Choudhry. The Diophantine systemP xr i = P yr i, r = 1, 3, 5. Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 83(1991), 85–86. A.1.17

    1991

  30. [38]

    Multigrade chains with odd exponents.J

    Ajai Choudhry. Multigrade chains with odd exponents.J. Number Theory, 42(1992), 134–140. MR94a:11044

    1992

  31. [39]

    On triads of squares with equal sums and equal products

    Ajai Choudhry. On triads of squares with equal sums and equal products. Ganita, 49:101–106, 1998

    1998

  32. [40]

    On equal sums of sixth powers.Rocky Mountain J

    Ajai Choudhry. On equal sums of sixth powers.Rocky Mountain J. Math., 30(3):115–129, 2000. B.1.2

    2000

  33. [41]

    Equal sums of seventh powers.Rocky Mountain J

    Ajai Choudhry. Equal sums of seventh powers.Rocky Mountain J. Math., 30(3):849–852, 2000. A.1.18

    2000

  34. [42]

    Ideal solutions of the Tarry–Escott problem of degree four and a related Diophantine system

    Ajai Choudhry. Ideal solutions of the Tarry–Escott problem of degree four and a related Diophantine system. Enseign. Math., 46(3):313–323, 2000. A.1.21, B.1.7, C.1.4

    2000

  35. [43]

    Equal sums of like powers

    Ajai Choudhry. Equal sums of like powers. Rocky Mountain J. Math., 31(1):115–129, 2001. A.1.13, A.1.16, A.1.19, B.1.4 361

    2001

  36. [44]

    Triads of biquadrates with equal sums and equal products

    Ajai Choudhry. Triads of biquadrates with equal sums and equal products. Math. Student, 70:149–152, 2001

    2001

  37. [45]

    Triads of integers with equal sums of squares, cubes, and fourth powers.Bull

    Ajai Choudhry. Triads of integers with equal sums of squares, cubes, and fourth powers.Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 35(6):821–824, 2003. B.1.4

    2003

  38. [46]

    A diophantine system related to the Tarry-Escott problem with no non-trivial solutions.Indian J

    Ajai Choudhry. A diophantine system related to the Tarry-Escott problem with no non-trivial solutions.Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 35, No. 12, 1395- 1398 (2004). 1.2.2

    2004

  39. [47]

    Some Diophantine problems concerning equal sums of in- tegers and their cubes.Hardy-Ramanujan J., 33:59–70, 2010

    Ajai Choudhry. Some Diophantine problems concerning equal sums of in- tegers and their cubes.Hardy-Ramanujan J., 33:59–70, 2010. B.3.1

    2010

  40. [48]

    Equal sums of like powers, both positive and negative

    Ajai Choudhry. Equal sums of like powers, both positive and negative. Rocky Mountain J. Math., 41(3):737–763, 2011. 7, 7.1, 7.1, A.5.1, A.5.4, B.5.2, B.5.8, B.5.11, B.5.12, B.5.21

    2011

  41. [49]

    Equal sums of like powers and equal products of integers

    Ajai Choudhry. Equal sums of like powers and equal products of integers. Rocky Mountain J. Math., 43(3):763–792, 2013. 7, A.3.6, A.3.7, A.3.20, A.3.23, B.3.2, B.3.4, B.3.6

    2013

  42. [50]

    Three triads of integers with equal sums of squares and cubes.Rocky Mountain J

    Ajai Choudhry and Jarosław Wróblewski. Three triads of integers with equal sums of squares and cubes.Rocky Mountain J. Math., 44(2):435–441,

  43. [51]

    Quadratic Diophantine equations with applications to quar- tic equations

    Ajai Choudhry. Quadratic Diophantine equations with applications to quar- tic equations. Rocky Mountain J. Math., 46(3):769–799, 2016

    2016

  44. [52]

    A new approach to the Tarry–Escott problem

    Ajai Choudhry. A new approach to the Tarry–Escott problem. Int. J. Number Theory, 13(2):393–417, 2017. MR3660628

    2017

  45. [53]

    Triads of integers with equal sums of squares and equal products and a related multigrade chain.Acta Arith., 2023 (to appear)

    Ajai Choudhry and Jarosław Wróblewski. Triads of integers with equal sums of squares and equal products and a related multigrade chain.Acta Arith., 2023 (to appear). A.3.3

    2023

  46. [54]

    A Diophantine problem on biquadrates revisited

    Ajai Choudhry. A Diophantine problem on biquadrates revisited. Preprint,

  47. [55]

    Ideal solutions of the Tarry–Escott problem of degree seven

    Ajai Choudhry. Ideal solutions of the Tarry–Escott problem of degree seven. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.12726, 2022. A.1.20, A.1.38

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Quartic Diophantine chains.Acta Arith., 128(4):339–348, 2007

    Ajai Choudhry and Jarosław Wróblewski. Quartic Diophantine chains.Acta Arith., 128(4):339–348, 2007

    2007

  49. [57]

    Ideal solutions of the Tarry– Escott problem of degree eleven with applications to sums of thirteenth powers

    Ajai Choudhry and Jarosław Wróblewski. Ideal solutions of the Tarry– Escott problem of degree eleven with applications to sums of thirteenth powers. Hardy-Ramanujan J., 31:1–13, 2008. MR2467597 A.1.34, A.1.42

    2008

  50. [58]

    Coppersmith, M

    D. Coppersmith, M. Mossinghoff, D. Scheinerman, and J. VanderKam. Ideal solutions in the Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem. Math. Comp., 93(349):2473–2501, 2024. 6, 6.2 362

    2024

  51. [59]

    J. Delorme. On the Diophantine equation x6 1 + x6 2 + x6 3 = y6 1 + y6 2 + y6 3. Math. Comp., 59(1992), 703–715. A.1.11

    1992

  52. [60]

    L. E. Dickson. History of the Theory of Numbers, Vol. 2. Chelsea, New York, 1952. 1.1, 1.1, A.1.4, A.1.5, A.1.20

    1952

  53. [61]

    L. E. Dickson. Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. Dover, New York, 1957 (reprint). A.1.5, A.1.12

    1957

  54. [62]

    H. L. Dorwart and O. E. Brown. The Tarry–Escott problem.Amer. Math. Monthly, 44(10):613–626, 1937. A.1.5, A.1.12, A.1.35

    1937

  55. [63]

    H. L. Dorwart. Sequences of ideal solutions in the Tarry–Escott problem. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 53(4):381–391, 1947. A.1.35, A.1.40

    1947

  56. [64]

    Noam D. Elkies. OnA4 = B4 + C4 + D4. Math. Comp., 51(1988), 825–835

    1988

  57. [65]

    Randy L. Ekl. Equal sums of four seventh powers.Math. Comp., 65(1996), 1755–1756

    1996

  58. [66]

    Randy L. Ekl. New results in equal sums of like powers. Math. Comp., 67(1998), 1309–1315

    1998

  59. [67]

    E. B. Escott. Logarithmic series. Quarterly Journal of Math., 41(1910), 141–167

    1910

  60. [68]

    Translated by J

    Leonhard Euler.Introduction to Analysis of the Infinite: Book I. Translated by J. D. Blanton. Springer New York, 1988. 4.1.2

    1988

  61. [69]

    Filaseta and M

    M. Filaseta and M. Markovich. Newton polygons and the Prouhet–Tarry– Escott problem. J. Number Theory, 174:384–400, 2017. MR3597397

    2017

  62. [70]

    Girard-Newton identities for symmetric functions

    Paul Garrett. Girard-Newton identities for symmetric functions. https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~garrett/m/algebra/notes_ 2023-24/girard-newton.pdf January 19, 2010. 2.1.2

    2023

  63. [71]

    A. Gloden. Mehrgradige Gleichungen. P. Noorhoff, Groningen, 2nd ed.,

  64. [72]

    A. Gloden. Two theorems on multi-degree equalities.Amer. Math. Monthly, 55(1948), 86–88. A.1.26

    1948

  65. [73]

    A. Gloden. Parametric solutions of two multi-degreed equalities. Amer. Math. Monthly, 55(1948), 86–88. A.1.10

    1948

  66. [74]

    A. Gloden. Uber mehrgradige Gleichungen.Arch. Math., 1(1949), 482–483

    1949

  67. [75]

    A. Gloden. Note on systems of Diophantine equations. Scripta Math., 15:163–164, 1949. A.1.9, A.1.9, A.1.9, C.1.6 363

    1949

  68. [76]

    A. Gloden. Zwei Parameterlosungen einer mehrgradigen Gleichung.Arch. Math., 1(1949), 480–482. A.1.26

    1949

  69. [77]

    Guy.Unsolved Problems in Number Theory, 3rd ed

    Richard K. Guy.Unsolved Problems in Number Theory, 3rd ed. Springer, New York, 2004. 1.1, A.3.2, A.3.3, A.3.4, A.3.5

    2004

  70. [78]

    H. Gupta. A system of equations having no nontrivial solutions. J. of Research, National Bureau of Standards, 71B(1967), 181–182

    1967

  71. [79]

    H. Gupta. Selected Topics in Number Theory. Abacus Press, Kent, 1980, 322–331

    1980

  72. [80]

    L. Hahn. The Tarry–Escott problem (Problem 10284). Amer. Math. Monthly, 1995, 843–844

    1995

  73. [81]

    J. H. Han and M. D. Hirschhorn. Another look at an amazing identity of Ramanujan. Math. Mag., 79(2006), 302–304. 7.1

    2006

  74. [82]

    G. H. Hardy and E. M. Wright.An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 1st ed. Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1938. 1.1, 1.2.2, 1.4, 1.4.1, A.1.2, A.1.5, A.1.10, A.1.11, A.1.12, A.1.28

    1938

  75. [83]

    M. D. Hirschhorn. An amazing identity of Ramanujan. Math. Mag., 68.3(1995), 199–201. 7.1

    1995

  76. [84]

    M. D. Hirschhorn. A proof in the spirit of Zeilberger of an amazing identity of Ramanujan.Math. Mag., 69.4(1996), 267–269. 7.1

    1996

  77. [85]

    Waring’s Problem and the Problem of Prouhet and Tarry

    Loo-Keng Hua. Waring’s Problem and the Problem of Prouhet and Tarry. In: Introduction to Number Theory.Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1982, 494–

    1982

  78. [86]

    On Tarry’s problem.The Quarterly Journal of Mathemat- ics, Oxford Ser

    Loo-Keng Hua. On Tarry’s problem.The Quarterly Journal of Mathemat- ics, Oxford Ser. 9(1938), 315-320. 1.2.3

    1938

  79. [87]

    Improvement of a result of Wright.Jour

    Loo-Keng Hua. Improvement of a result of Wright.Jour. London Math. Soc., 24(1949), 157–159

    1949

  80. [88]

    On the number of solutions of Tarry’s problem.Acta Sci

    Loo-Keng Hua. On the number of solutions of Tarry’s problem.Acta Sci. Sinica, 1(1952), 1–76

    1952

  81. [89]

    https://www.math

    Jarosław Wróblewski.Equal Sums of Powers - Tables. https://www.math. uni.wroc.pl/~jwr/eslp/tables.htm 7, A.1.3, A.1.18

  82. [90]

    Jarosław Wróblewski.Equal Sums and Differences of Fourth Powers. 2006. https://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/~jwr/422/index.htm A.1.4, A.1.4

    2006

  83. [91]

    A Collection of Numerical Solutions of Multigrade Equations Related to the Prouhet–Tarry–Escott Problem, Version 12

    Jarosław Wróblewski. A Collection of Numerical Solutions of Multigrade Equations Related to the Prouhet–Tarry–Escott Problem, Version 12. 2009. http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/~jwr/eslp/ 7, A.1.33, A.1.33, B.1.11, B.1.12 364

    2009

  84. [92]

    J. B. Kelly. Two equal sums of three squares with equal products.Amer. Math. Monthly, 98(6):527–529, 1991. A.3.3, A.3.3

    1991

  85. [93]

    H. Kleiman. A note on the Tarry–Escott problem.J. Reine Angew. Math., 278:48–51, 1975. MR389758

    1975

  86. [94]

    A. I. Kostrikin. Exercises in Algebra: A Collection of Exercises in Algebra, Linear Algebra and Geometry.Algebra, Logic and Applications series, vol

  87. [95]

    L. J. Lander and T. R. Parkin. Equal sums of biquadrates.Math. Comp., 20(96):450–451, 1966. A.1.4

    1966

  88. [96]

    L. J. Lander and T. R. Parkin. A counterexample to Euler’s conjecture on sums of like powers.Math. Comp., 21(1967), 101–103

    1967

  89. [97]

    Gordan and Breach Publishers, 1996. 2.1.2

    1996

  90. [98]

    L. J. Lander. Geometric aspects of Diophantine equations involving equal sums of like powers. Amer. Math. Monthly, 75(1968), 1061–1073. A.1.8, A.1.17

    1968

  91. [99]

    L. J. Lander. Three thirteens.Math. Comp., 27(1973), 397

    1973

  92. [100]

    L. J. Lander, T. R. Parkin, and J. L. Selfridge. A survey of equal sums of like powers.Math. Comp., 21(100):446–459, 1967. A.1.4, A.1.8, A.1.11, A.1.15

    1967

  93. [101]

    J. Leech. On A4 + B4 + C4 + D4 = E4. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 54(1958), 554–555

    1958

  94. [102]

    D. H. Lehmer. The Tarry-Escott problem.Scripta Math., 1947, 37–41

    1947

  95. [103]

    J. Leech. Some solutions of Diophantine equations.Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 53(1957), 778–780. A.1.3

    1957

  96. [104]

    An identity motivated by an amazing identity of Ra- manujan

    James Mc Laughlin. An identity motivated by an amazing identity of Ra- manujan. The Fibonacci Quarterly, 48(1):34–38, 2010. 7.1

    2010

  97. [105]

    Einige numerische Identitäten

    Alfred Moessner. Einige numerische Identitäten. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. A, 10(4):296–306, 1939. 7, A.1.6, A.1.8, A.3.2

    1939

  98. [106]

    A. Letac. Gazeta Matematică, 48:68–69, October 1942. A.1.26, A.1.27, A.1.40, A.1.41, B.1.9

    1942

  99. [107]

    On the multiple identity xn 1 + xn 2 + xn 3 + xn 4 + xn 5 = yn 1 + yn 2 + yn 3 + yn 4 + yn 5 for n = 1 , 3, 5, 7

    Alfred Moessner. On the multiple identity xn 1 + xn 2 + xn 3 + xn 4 + xn 5 = yn 1 + yn 2 + yn 3 + yn 4 + yn 5 for n = 1 , 3, 5, 7. Scrip. Math., 18(1952), 90–91. A.1.26

    1952

  100. [108]

    On some sets of integers with equal sums of like powers.Publ

    Alfred Moessner and George Xeroudakes. On some sets of integers with equal sums of like powers.Publ. Inst. Math., 6(12):125–136, 1954. 365

    1954

  101. [109]

    On equal sums of powers.Math

    Alfred Moessner. On equal sums of powers.Math. Student, 15(1947), 83–88. A.1.26

    1947

  102. [110]

    Computing Minimal Equal Sums Of Like Powers

    Jean-Charles Meyrignac. Computing Minimal Equal Sums Of Like Powers. http://euler.free.fr/ A.1.18

  103. [111]

    http://euler.free.fr/dataprime.txt 1.2.3, A.1.2, A.1.3, A.1.4, A.1.8, A.1.11, A.1.17, A.1.26

    Jean-Charles Meyrignac. http://euler.free.fr/dataprime.txt 1.2.3, A.1.2, A.1.3, A.1.4, A.1.8, A.1.11, A.1.17, A.1.26

  104. [112]

    Two Diophantine systems

    Alfred Moessner and George Xeroudakes. Two Diophantine systems. Manuscripta Math., 18(1):337–342, 1976. A.3.11, C.1.7

    1976

  105. [113]

    G. Palama. Multigrade normali del 9 ordine inverso del teorema di Gloden. Uni.Roma 1st Naz.Alta Mat. Rend.Mat e Appl., 1950, Vol. 5, Part. 9, 228–

    1950

  106. [114]

    G. Palama. Diophantine systems of the type P(ak i ) = P(bk i ), (k = 1, 2, . . . , n, n+2, n+4, . . . , n+2r). Scripta Math., 19:132–134, 1953. A.1.25, B.1.6, B.1.8

    1953

  107. [115]

    Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_identities Newton’s identities. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. [Online; accessed 2025-05- 06]. 2.1.1, 2.1.2

    2025

  108. [116]

    The Prouhet–Tarry–Escott Problem

    Min Qiu. The Prouhet–Tarry–Escott Problem. Master’s Thesis, Southwest University, 2016. 6, 6.2, A.1.35

    2016

  109. [117]

    Ramanujan

    S. Ramanujan. The Lost Notebook and other Unpublished Papers. With an introduction by George E. Andrews. Springer-Verlag, Berlin; Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 1988. 4.3, 7.1

    1988

  110. [118]

    A Collection of Algebraic Identities

    Titus Piezas III. A Collection of Algebraic Identities. https://sites. google.com/view/tpiezas, 2009. A.1.3, A.1.8, A.1.9, A.1.26, A.3.22, B.3.1

    2009

  111. [119]

    The Prouhet Tarry Escott Problem: A Review

    Srikanth Raghavendran and Veena Narayanan. The Prouhet Tarry Escott Problem: A Review. Mathematics, 7(2019), 227.https://www.mdpi.com/ 2227-7390/7/3/227 1.1

    2019

  112. [120]

    Rosenstiel, J

    E. Rosenstiel, J. A. Dardis, and C. R. Rosenstiel. The four least solutions in distinct positive integers of the Diophantine equations = x3 + y3 = z3 + w3 = u3 + v3 = m3 + n3. Bull. Inst. Math. Appl., 27(1991), no. 7, 155–157. MR92i:11134. A.1.3

    1991

  113. [121]

    B. C. Berndt.Ramanujan’s Notebooks, Part IV. Springer, 1994. 4.3

    1994

  114. [122]

    S. Sastry. On sums of powers.Jour. London Math. Soc., 9(1934), 170–171

    1934

  115. [123]

    S. Sastry. On equal sums of like powers.Math. Student, 15(1947), 29–32. 366

    1947

  116. [124]

    Rees and C

    E. Rees and C. Smyth. On the constant in the Tarry–Escott problem. In Cinquante Ans de Polynômes (Paris, 1988), M. Langevin and M. Wald- schmidt, eds., Lect. Notes Math., vol. 1415, pp. 196–208, Springer, Berlin,

    1988

  117. [125]

    J. H. Silverman. Taxicabs and sums of two cubes.Amer. Math. Monthly, 1993, 331–340. A.1.3

    1993

  118. [126]

    R. N. Singh. Equal sums of like powers.Math. Student, 56(1988), no. 1–4, 192–194. MR90m:11044

    1988

  119. [127]

    Onequalsumsoflikepowers

    S.SastryandT.Rai. Onequalsumsoflikepowers. Math. Student, 16(1948), 18–19

    1948

  120. [128]

    T. N. Sinha. On the Tarry–Escott problem. Amer. Math. Monthly, 73(3):280–285, 1966. A.1.26

    1966

  121. [129]

    T. N. Sinha. A note on equal sums of like powers.Math. Student, 46(1978), no. 2–4, 121–123. MR84e:10025

    1978

  122. [130]

    T. N. Sinha. Some systems of Diophantine equations of the Tarry–Escott type. J. Indian Math. Soc., 30:15–25, 1966. A.1.26

    1966

  123. [131]

    C. J. Smyth. Ideal 9th-order multigrades and Letac’s elliptic curve.Math. Comp., 57(196):817–823, 1991. MR1094960 A.1.27, A.1.27, A.1.41

    1991

  124. [132]

    Subba Rao

    K. Subba Rao. On sums of sixth powers.J. London Math. Soc., 9(3):172– 173, 1934. A.1.11

    1934

  125. [133]

    T. N. Sinha. Diophantine Systems of the Tarry–Escott Type. Anupam, India, 1984. A.1.9, A.1.16, A.1.27, A.3.2

    1984

  126. [134]

    Computational Number Theory

    Seiji Tomita. Computational Number Theory. http://www.maroon.dti. ne.jp/fermat/eindex.html, 2021. A.1.8

    2021

  127. [135]

    E. M. Wright. The Prouhet-Lehmer problem. Jour. London Math. Soc., 23(1948), 279–285

    1948

  128. [136]

    G. Tarry. L’intermediaire des mathematiciens, 19(1912), 200, 219–221; 20(1913), 68–70. A.1.28, A.1.38

    1912

  129. [137]

    E. M. Wright. On Tarry’s problem (II).Quart. J. of Math., 7(1936), 43–45

    1936

  130. [138]

    E. M. Wright. On Tarry’s problem (III). Quart. J. of Math., 8(1937), 48–50

    1937

  131. [139]

    E. M. Wright. On Tarry’s problem (I).Quart. J. of Math., 6(1935), 261– 267

    1935

  132. [140]

    E. M. Wright. Equal sums of like powers.Proc. Edin. Math. Soc., 8(1949), 138–142

    1949

  133. [141]

    E. M. Wright. An “easier” Waring problem. Jour. London Math. Soc., 9(1934), 267–272. 367

    1934

  134. [142]

    E. M. Wright. Equal sums of like powers.Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 54(1948), 755–757

    1948

  135. [143]

    E. M. Wright. Prouhet’s 1851 solution of the Tarry-Escott problem of 1910. Amer. Math. Monthly, 66(1959), 199–201. 1.1

    1959

  136. [144]

    Basic Algebra, Volume 1 (in Chinese)

    Nanhua Xi. Basic Algebra, Volume 1 (in Chinese). Science Press, Beijing, September 2016. 2.1.2

    2016

  137. [145]

    E. M. Wright. The Tarry-Escott and the “easier” Waring problems.J. Reine Angew. Math., 311/312(1979), 170–173

    1979

  138. [146]

    Aurel J. Zajta. Solutions of the Diophantine equationA4 + B4 = C4 + D4. Math. Comp., 41(164):635–659, 1983. MR85d:11025 A.1.4

    1983

  139. [147]

    On the Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem

    Qian Zhang. On the Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem. Master’s Thesis, Southwest University, 2023. 6, 6.2 Author Information Chen Shuwen1 Seekway Innovations Technology Co., Ltd. Room 1001, Tower 3, Qunhua Hi-Tech Park, No.15 Qunhua Road Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province, P.R. Chin...

    2023

  140. [148]

    On equal sums of like powers

    George Xeroudakes and Alfred Moessner. On equal sums of like powers. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. A, 48(4):245–255, 1958. A.1.17, A.3.3, A.3.6, B.1.5, C.1.12, D.1.2

    1958

  141. [1944]

    MR0019638 1.1, 1.4, 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 7, A.1.2, A.1.5, A.1.10, A.1.10, A.1.12, A.1.26, A.1.26, A.1.27, A.1.28, A.1.28, A.1.38, A.1.40, A.1.41, A.3.2, A.3.3, A.3.6, B.1.1, B.1.5, B.1.7, B.1.9, B.1.10

  142. [2023]

    1.2, 1.2.3, A.1.2, A.1.5, A.1.6, A.1.7, A.1.10, A.1.11, A.1.13, A.1.14, A.1.15, A.1.16, A.1.17, A.1.18, A.1.19, A.1.20, A.1.21, A.1.22, A.1.23, A.1.24, A.1.25, A.1.26, A.1.27, A.1.28, A.1.29, A.1.30, A.1.31, A.1.32, 360 A.1.33, A.1.34, A.1.35, A.1.36, A.1.37, A.1.38, A.1.39, A...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.