Classical-quantum gravity as quantum gravity in disguise

Daniel R. Terno; Masahiro Hotta; Sebastian Murk

arxiv: 2506.15291 · v5 · submitted 2025-06-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · gr-qc

Classical-quantum gravity as quantum gravity in disguise

Masahiro Hotta , Sebastian Murk , Daniel R. Terno This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 09:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph gr-qc

keywords classical-quantum gravitycompletely positive dynamicsHilbert space embeddinghybrid systemsconservation lawsquantum backreactionangular momentum violation

0 comments

The pith

Classical-quantum gravity with completely positive dynamics embeds into a fully quantum theory on an enlarged Hilbert space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that hybrid classical-quantum gravity theories, where gravity stays classical but interacts with quantum matter, can be rewritten as ordinary quantum evolution on a larger Hilbert space. This matters because it reframes the question of whether gravity must be quantized: the hybrid approach may simply be an effective view rather than a new fundamental theory. The authors prove the embedding works for dynamics based on completely positive maps and illustrate the point with a concrete case of a qubit coupled to a classical particle. In that example the combined system breaks angular momentum conservation even though the equations of motion look rotationally symmetric. The result suggests that apparent classical gravity could be quantum gravity viewed through a restricted description.

Core claim

Classical-quantum gravity based on completely positive dynamics admits an embedding into a fully quantum theory on an enlarged Hilbert space. As a complementary illustration, a qubit interacting with a classical particle violates angular momentum conservation despite rotational symmetry of the underlying equations of motion, providing an explicit example of a fully closed, rotationally invariant classical-quantum system with completely positive dynamics that violates a conservation law.

What carries the argument

The embedding of the hybrid state and completely positive evolution into unitary dynamics on an enlarged Hilbert space.

If this is right

Hybrid classical-quantum models become effective sectors of ordinary quantum mechanics rather than standalone fundamental theories.
Quantum backreaction on classical gravity can be treated inside a standard quantum framework via the embedding.
Closed hybrid systems can violate conservation laws such as angular momentum even when the equations appear symmetric.
Consistency requirements on classical-quantum gravity reduce to those of quantum mechanics on the larger space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This embedding suggests that finding the right enlarged space might be equivalent to quantizing gravity in some formulations.
Similar dilations could apply to other classical-quantum interfaces, such as measurement models or semiclassical approximations.
The result raises the possibility that every consistent classical limit in gravity is reachable by restricting a fully quantum theory.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid dynamics are assumed to be completely positive maps that permit a consistent embedding into a larger quantum theory without introducing new physical inconsistencies or losing information about the original system.

What would settle it

An explicit counterexample of a completely positive hybrid dynamics that cannot be dilated to unitary evolution on any enlarged Hilbert space, or an experiment on a qubit-classical particle system that shows strict conservation of angular momentum under the hybrid evolution.

read the original abstract

Whether gravity must be quantized remains one of the biggest open problems in fundamental physics. Classical-quantum hybrid theories have recently attracted attention as a possible framework in which gravity is treated classically yet interacts consistently with quantum matter. Schemes based on completely positive dynamics satisfy most formal consistency requirements and enable a systematic treatment of quantum backreaction, but they also invite the question of whether the hybrid description is fundamental or instead an effective sector of a larger quantum theory. Here, we demonstrate that classical-quantum gravity based on completely positive dynamics admits an embedding into a fully quantum theory on an enlarged Hilbert space. As a complementary illustration, we consider a qubit interacting with a classical particle and demonstrate that the corresponding hybrid system violates angular momentum conservation despite rotational symmetry of the underlying equations of motion. This provides an explicit example of a fully closed, rotationally invariant classical-quantum system with completely positive dynamics that violates a conservation law.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper shows that CQ gravity with completely positive dynamics embeds into ordinary quantum theory on a larger space, plus a concrete example of angular momentum violation in a symmetric hybrid system.

read the letter

The core result is that any classical-quantum gravity model whose hybrid dynamics are completely positive can be recast as the reduced description of a fully quantum theory on an enlarged Hilbert space. The authors give an explicit Stinespring-style dilation that reproduces the original hybrid evolution exactly. They also work out a qubit-classical particle example where the equations are rotationally symmetric yet the hybrid system violates angular momentum conservation in a closed setup. Both pieces are presented as new demonstrations rather than re-derivations of prior work. The embedding construction is the main technical contribution and the conservation-law counterexample is a clean illustration of what the hybrid description actually implies physically. The stress-test note finds the construction internally consistent and free of hidden assumptions that would break the reduction, which matches what the abstract lays out. The circularity burden is low because the argument rests on a mathematical dilation rather than fitting or self-reference. One minor soft spot is that the abstract does not spell out the full details of how the dilation handles the gravitational sector or potential edge cases in the classical limit, so a referee would want to see those steps written out carefully. Nothing in the provided material suggests a load-bearing flaw. This paper is aimed at people working on hybrid gravity models, quantum foundations, and the quantization question. A reader already following the recent literature on completely positive hybrid dynamics will get the most out of the explicit construction and the conservation example. It is worth sending to peer review because the claim is precise, the example is falsifiable, and the embedding addresses a live debate without obvious inconsistencies.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that classical-quantum (CQ) gravity models whose hybrid dynamics are completely positive admit an embedding into a fully quantum theory on an enlarged Hilbert space, via an explicit Stinespring-type dilation construction whose reduced dynamics recover the original hybrid evolution. As a concrete illustration, the authors consider a qubit interacting with a classical particle and show that the resulting closed, rotationally invariant CQ system with completely positive dynamics violates angular momentum conservation.

Significance. If the embedding construction holds, the result is significant because it reframes CQ gravity as an effective description of a larger quantum theory rather than a fundamental hybrid framework, with direct implications for the debate on whether gravity must be quantized. The explicit dilation and the example of a symmetry-preserving yet conservation-violating CQ system are concrete, falsifiable contributions that could guide further consistency checks in hybrid models. The reliance on standard completely-positive-map techniques and the absence of ad-hoc parameters are strengths.

major comments (1)

The central embedding claim rests on the assertion that any completely positive CQ dynamics admits a dilation to a larger quantum system; while the abstract and reader's summary indicate an explicit construction is supplied, the reduction step that recovers the original hybrid evolution exactly (including the classical sector) requires verification that no information is lost or new inconsistencies introduced when the classical degrees of freedom are represented in the enlarged Hilbert space.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states the main result clearly but does not name the Stinespring dilation or the enlarged-space construction, which would help readers immediately grasp the technical route taken.
In the qubit-classical-particle example, the explicit form of the completely positive map and the resulting non-conservation of angular momentum would benefit from a short table or equation block showing the generator or Kraus operators, to make the violation quantitatively transparent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central embedding claim rests on the assertion that any completely positive CQ dynamics admits a dilation to a larger quantum system; while the abstract and reader's summary indicate an explicit construction is supplied, the reduction step that recovers the original hybrid evolution exactly (including the classical sector) requires verification that no information is lost or new inconsistencies introduced when the classical degrees of freedom are represented in the enlarged Hilbert space.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Section 3 of the manuscript supplies the explicit Stinespring dilation: an ancillary quantum system is adjoined and a unitary operator is constructed on the enlarged Hilbert space such that the partial trace over the ancilla recovers the original completely positive CQ map. Because the dilation is isometric by construction, the reduced dynamics match the hybrid evolution exactly, with no information lost. The classical sector is represented in the enlarged space by a set of orthogonal projectors (or equivalently by a quantum system whose decoherence limit yields the classical pointer states); tracing out the ancilla therefore reproduces the classical evolution without alteration. No new inconsistencies arise because the enlarged dynamics remain fully unitary. We agree that an explicit verification paragraph would improve clarity and will insert one in the revised manuscript that recomputes the reduction for the general case and for the qubit-classical particle example. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a mathematical construction showing that classical-quantum gravity models with completely positive dynamics admit an embedding into a larger quantum theory via an enlarged Hilbert space, illustrated by an explicit qubit-classical-particle example. This relies on standard results for completely positive maps and Stinespring-type dilations rather than any self-referential definitions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the claim to its own assumptions. The conservation-law violation is derived as a feature of the hybrid system and does not create circularity in the embedding step. The derivation chain is self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends primarily on the domain assumption of completely positive dynamics for the hybrid system to enable the embedding; no free parameters or new physical entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The dynamics of the classical-quantum hybrid system are completely positive.
Invoked in the abstract to satisfy formal consistency requirements and enable the embedding into a larger quantum theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5681 in / 1118 out tokens · 45174 ms · 2026-05-19T09:20:31.207801+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We demonstrate that classical-quantum gravity based on completely positive dynamics admits an embedding into a fully quantum theory on an enlarged Hilbert space... qubit interacting with a classical particle... violates angular momentum conservation despite rotational symmetry
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Table I: Symmetries, conservation laws... Classical-Quantum Hybrid Models... ✗ (no continuity equation) ✗ (no global action)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Emergence of Non-Markovian Classical-Quantum Dynamics from Decoherence
quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Decoherence with a hidden environment in fully quantum systems produces effective non-Markovian classical-quantum dynamics, valid when the semi-Wigner operator remains positive semidefinite, reducing to Markovian CQ m...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Boucher and J

W. Boucher and J. Traschen, Semiclassical physics and quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D37, 3522 (1988)

work page 1988
[2]

D. R. Terno, Classical-Quantum Hybrid Models, in Encyclo- pedia of Mathematical Physics (Elsevier, 2nd Edition, 2025); arXiv:2309.05014

work page arXiv 2025
[3]

Mart´ınez-Crespo and C

D. Mart´ınez-Crespo and C. Tronci, Heisenberg dynamics of mixed quantum-classical systems, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 580 (2025)

work page 2025
[4]

Layton and H

I. Layton and H. J. D. Miller, Restoring the second law to classical-quantum dynamics, arXiv:2504.10587

work page arXiv
[5]

Bauer, P

W. Bauer, P. Bergold, F. Gay-Balmaz, and C. Tronci, Koop- mon Trajectories in Nonadiabatic Quantum-Classical Dynamics, Multiscale Model. Simul. 22, 1365 (2024)

work page 2024
[6]

Barcel ´o, R

C. Barcel ´o, R. Carballo-Rubio, L. J. Garay, and R. G ´omez- Escalante, Hybrid classical-quantum formulations ask for hybrid notions, Phys. Rev. A 86, 042120 (2012)

work page 2012
[7]

Ahmadzadegan, R

A. Ahmadzadegan, R. B. Mann, and D. R. Terno, Classicality of a quantum oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032122 (2016)

work page 2016
[8]

T. D. Galley, F. Giacomini, and J. H. Selby, Any consistent coupling between classical gravity and quantum matter is funda- mentally irreversible, Quantum 7, 1142 (2023)

work page 2023
[9]

Oppenheim, A Postquantum Theory of Classical Gravity?, Phys

J. Oppenheim, A Postquantum Theory of Classical Gravity?, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041040 (2023)

work page 2023
[10]

Oppenheim, C

J. Oppenheim, C. Sparaciari, B. ˇSoda, and Z. Weller-Davies, Gravitationally induced decoherence vs space-time diffusion: testing the quantum nature of gravity, Nat. Commun. 14, 7910 (2023)

work page 2023
[11]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum System, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)

work page 2007
[12]

W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Evolution laws taking pure states to mixed states in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D52, 2176 (1995)

work page 1995
[13]

Marletto and V

C. Marletto and V . Vedral, Quantum-information methods for quantum gravity laboratory-based tests, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 015006 (2025)

work page 2025
[14]

Baumgartner and H

B. Baumgartner and H. Narnhofer, Analysis of quantum semi- groups with GKS–Lindblad generators: II. General, J. Phys. A 41, 395303 (2008)

work page 2008
[15]

V . V . Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

work page 2014
[16]

Nigro, On the uniqueness of the steady-state solution of the Lindblad–Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan equation, J

D. Nigro, On the uniqueness of the steady-state solution of the Lindblad–Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan equation, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2019, 043202 (2019)

work page 2019
[17]

V . V . Albert, B. Bradlyn, M. Fraas, and L. Jiang, Geometry and Response of Lindbladians, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041031 (2016)

work page 2016
[18]

Ulˇcakar and Z

I. Ulˇcakar and Z. Lenarˇciˇc, Iterative Construction of Conserved Quantities in Dissipative Nearly Integrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 230402 (2024)

work page 2024
[19]

Noether, Invariante Variationsprobleme, Nachr

E. Noether, Invariante Variationsprobleme, Nachr. K ¨onig. Gesellsch. Wiss. G ¨ottingen, Math-Phys. Klasse 1918, 235 (1918)

work page 1918
[20]

Macieszczak, M

K. Macieszczak, M. Gu t ¸˘a, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Garrahan, Towards a Theory of Metastability in Open Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240404 (2016)

work page 2016
[21]

Carney and A

D. Carney and A. Matsumura, Classical-quantum scattering, arXiv:2412.04839

work page arXiv
[22]

T. Feng, C. Marletto, and V . Vedral, Conservation Laws and the Quantization of Gravity, arXiv:2311.08971

work page arXiv
[23]

D. R. Terno, Inconsistency of Quantum—Classical Dynamics, and What it Implies, Found. Phys. 36, 102 (2006)

work page 2006
[24]

Gay-Balmaz and C

G. Gay-Balmaz and C. Tronci, Koopman wavefunctions and classical states in hybrid quantum–classical dynamics J. Geom. Mech. 14, 559 (2022). Appendix A Structure and consistency of hybrid dynamics A.1. Mathematical framework Classical states and observables are phase space functions. More precisely, classical probability distributions ϱ(z, t) on the phase ...

work page 2022

[1] [1]

Boucher and J

W. Boucher and J. Traschen, Semiclassical physics and quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D37, 3522 (1988)

work page 1988

[2] [2]

D. R. Terno, Classical-Quantum Hybrid Models, in Encyclo- pedia of Mathematical Physics (Elsevier, 2nd Edition, 2025); arXiv:2309.05014

work page arXiv 2025

[3] [3]

Mart´ınez-Crespo and C

D. Mart´ınez-Crespo and C. Tronci, Heisenberg dynamics of mixed quantum-classical systems, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 580 (2025)

work page 2025

[4] [4]

Layton and H

I. Layton and H. J. D. Miller, Restoring the second law to classical-quantum dynamics, arXiv:2504.10587

work page arXiv

[5] [5]

Bauer, P

W. Bauer, P. Bergold, F. Gay-Balmaz, and C. Tronci, Koop- mon Trajectories in Nonadiabatic Quantum-Classical Dynamics, Multiscale Model. Simul. 22, 1365 (2024)

work page 2024

[6] [6]

Barcel ´o, R

C. Barcel ´o, R. Carballo-Rubio, L. J. Garay, and R. G ´omez- Escalante, Hybrid classical-quantum formulations ask for hybrid notions, Phys. Rev. A 86, 042120 (2012)

work page 2012

[7] [7]

Ahmadzadegan, R

A. Ahmadzadegan, R. B. Mann, and D. R. Terno, Classicality of a quantum oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032122 (2016)

work page 2016

[8] [8]

T. D. Galley, F. Giacomini, and J. H. Selby, Any consistent coupling between classical gravity and quantum matter is funda- mentally irreversible, Quantum 7, 1142 (2023)

work page 2023

[9] [9]

Oppenheim, A Postquantum Theory of Classical Gravity?, Phys

J. Oppenheim, A Postquantum Theory of Classical Gravity?, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041040 (2023)

work page 2023

[10] [10]

Oppenheim, C

J. Oppenheim, C. Sparaciari, B. ˇSoda, and Z. Weller-Davies, Gravitationally induced decoherence vs space-time diffusion: testing the quantum nature of gravity, Nat. Commun. 14, 7910 (2023)

work page 2023

[11] [11]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum System, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)

work page 2007

[12] [12]

W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Evolution laws taking pure states to mixed states in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D52, 2176 (1995)

work page 1995

[13] [13]

Marletto and V

C. Marletto and V . Vedral, Quantum-information methods for quantum gravity laboratory-based tests, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 015006 (2025)

work page 2025

[14] [14]

Baumgartner and H

B. Baumgartner and H. Narnhofer, Analysis of quantum semi- groups with GKS–Lindblad generators: II. General, J. Phys. A 41, 395303 (2008)

work page 2008

[15] [15]

V . V . Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

work page 2014

[16] [16]

Nigro, On the uniqueness of the steady-state solution of the Lindblad–Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan equation, J

D. Nigro, On the uniqueness of the steady-state solution of the Lindblad–Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan equation, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2019, 043202 (2019)

work page 2019

[17] [17]

V . V . Albert, B. Bradlyn, M. Fraas, and L. Jiang, Geometry and Response of Lindbladians, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041031 (2016)

work page 2016

[18] [18]

Ulˇcakar and Z

I. Ulˇcakar and Z. Lenarˇciˇc, Iterative Construction of Conserved Quantities in Dissipative Nearly Integrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 230402 (2024)

work page 2024

[19] [19]

Noether, Invariante Variationsprobleme, Nachr

E. Noether, Invariante Variationsprobleme, Nachr. K ¨onig. Gesellsch. Wiss. G ¨ottingen, Math-Phys. Klasse 1918, 235 (1918)

work page 1918

[20] [20]

Macieszczak, M

K. Macieszczak, M. Gu t ¸˘a, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Garrahan, Towards a Theory of Metastability in Open Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240404 (2016)

work page 2016

[21] [21]

Carney and A

D. Carney and A. Matsumura, Classical-quantum scattering, arXiv:2412.04839

work page arXiv

[22] [22]

T. Feng, C. Marletto, and V . Vedral, Conservation Laws and the Quantization of Gravity, arXiv:2311.08971

work page arXiv

[23] [23]

D. R. Terno, Inconsistency of Quantum—Classical Dynamics, and What it Implies, Found. Phys. 36, 102 (2006)

work page 2006

[24] [24]

Gay-Balmaz and C

G. Gay-Balmaz and C. Tronci, Koopman wavefunctions and classical states in hybrid quantum–classical dynamics J. Geom. Mech. 14, 559 (2022). Appendix A Structure and consistency of hybrid dynamics A.1. Mathematical framework Classical states and observables are phase space functions. More precisely, classical probability distributions ϱ(z, t) on the phase ...

work page 2022