Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can Large Language Models Develop Strategic Reasoning? Post-training Insights from Learning Chess

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.00726 v3 pith:A4LV6Y6H submitted 2025-07-01 cs.AI cs.LG

Can Large Language Models Develop Strategic Reasoning? Post-training Insights from Learning Chess

classification cs.AI cs.LG
keywords reasoningmodelschessllmsstrategicdeficitdensedevelop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

While reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs) has shown promise in mathematical reasoning, strategic reasoning for LLMs using RL remains largely unexplored. We investigate whether LLMs can develop strategic reasoning capabilities through RL in chess. To this end, we leverage a chess-pretrained action-value network to provide dense reward on the LLM's output move quality, which can be seen as a form of knowledge distillation. Our experiments show that our distillation-based dense rewards often outperform sparse binary rewards. However, surprisingly, all models plateau far below expert levels. We provide SFT and RL ablations on chess reasoning training and find evidence that this limitation stems from a deficit in the pretrained models' internal understanding of chess-a deficit which RL alone may not be able to fully overcome. The code is available at https://github.com/krafton-ai/Chess-R1.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Weight of Silence: A Causal Case for Weights Over the Scratchpad in Latent Chess Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    In a chess latent-reasoning model, replacing or removing the silent thought vectors barely changes moves, so the RL improvement appears to be encoded in the weights, not in a consulted scratchpad.