REVIEW 2 cited by
LLM-Based Community Surveys for Operational Decision Making in Interconnected Utility Infrastructures
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
LLM-Based Community Surveys for Operational Decision Making in Interconnected Utility Infrastructures
read the original abstract
We represent interdependent infrastructure systems and communities alike with a hetero-functional graph (HFG) that encodes the dependencies between functionalities. This graph naturally imposes a partial order of functionalities that can inform the sequence of repair decisions to be made during a disaster across affected communities. However, using such technical criteria alone provides limited guidance at the point where the functionalities directly impact the communities, since these can be repaired in any order without violating the system constraints. To address this gap and improve resilience, we integrate community preferences to refine this partial order from the HFG into a total order. Our strategy involves getting the communities' opinions on their preferred sequence for repair crews to address infrastructure issues, considering potential constraints on resources. Due to the delay and cost associated with real-world survey data, we utilize a Large Language Model (LLM) as a proxy survey tool. We use the LLM to craft distinct personas representing individuals, each with varied disaster experiences. We construct diverse disaster scenarios, and each simulated persona provides input on prioritizing infrastructure repair needs across various communities. Finally, we apply learning algorithms to generate a global order based on the aggregated responses from these LLM-generated personas.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LISTEN to Your Preferences: An LLM Framework for Multi-Objective Selection
LISTEN is an agentic LLM framework for multi-objective selection using natural language, with LISTEN-U refining a parametric utility function and LISTEN-T performing tournament-style batch selections, showing context-...
-
LISTEN to Your Preferences: An LLM Framework for Multi-Objective Selection
LISTEN uses LLMs as zero-shot preference oracles, via iterative utility refinement (LISTEN-U) or tournament comparisons (LISTEN-T), to select preferred items from large multi-objective candidate sets.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.