pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.10812 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

Scalar-induced gravitational waves with non-Gaussianity up to all orders

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 22:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords scalar-induced gravitational wavesnon-Gaussianitylattice simulationsprimordial black holescurvature perturbationsearly universe cosmology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lattice simulations show that modest non-Gaussianity significantly changes the ultraviolet behavior of scalar-induced gravitational wave spectra.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors develop a lattice simulation technique to calculate the energy density spectra of scalar-induced gravitational waves that accounts for non-Gaussianity in the scalar perturbations to all orders. They first check that this matches previous semi-analytical calculations limited to lower orders of non-Gaussianity. Then they apply it to cases with higher-order non-Gaussianities, logarithmic terms in curvature perturbations, and specific inflationary models like the curvaton and ultra slow-roll scenarios. The central result is that even a small degree of non-Gaussianity can substantially modify the high-frequency part of these gravitational wave spectra.

Core claim

Using lattice simulations, the energy density spectra of scalar-induced gravitational waves can be computed including non-Gaussianity up to all orders. This reveals that modest non-Gaussianity alters the ultraviolet behaviors in the spectra, which has consequences for future detections and constraints involving primordial black holes.

What carries the argument

Direct lattice simulation of the scalar field evolution and the resulting induced gravitational waves, which naturally includes all orders of non-Gaussian correlations.

If this is right

  • Future observations of scalar-induced gravitational waves will need to consider non-Gaussianity to accurately interpret the signal strength and shape.
  • Constraints on primordial black holes from gravitational wave observations must be revisited when non-Gaussianity is present in the scalar perturbations.
  • Models predicting non-Gaussian scalar perturbations will have distinct predictions for the gravitational wave background at small scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This numerical method opens the door to studying non-Gaussian effects in more complex early-universe scenarios where perturbative methods fail.
  • Similar lattice approaches might be useful for calculating other induced signals in cosmology.
  • Verification against analytical limits at higher orders would strengthen the reliability of the ultraviolet results.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice simulation faithfully captures the full non-Gaussian contributions without being limited by numerical resolution or artifacts in the high-frequency regime.

What would settle it

Performing the lattice simulation at significantly higher spatial resolution and observing whether the ultraviolet tail of the spectrum remains unchanged would test if numerical effects are influencing the result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.10812 by Rong-Gen Cai, Shao-Jiang Wang, Xiang-Xi Zeng, Zhuan Ning.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Energy spectra of SIGW for different non-Gaussian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Energy spectra of SIGW for different higher-order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Energy spectra of SIGW for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Energy spectra of SIGW for different models. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Energy spectra of SIGW for different characteristic scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs) are ubiquitous in many early-Universe processes accompanied by non-Gaussianity; while Gaussian perturbation can generate significant SIGWs, computations of SIGWs can be significantly affected and enhanced if the scalar perturbations have some degree of non-Gaussianity; hence, precise calculations of these kinds of SIGWs involve a full understanding of non-Gaussianity. In this Letter, we propose to use the lattice simulations to directly calculate the energy density spectra of SIGWs with non-Gaussianity up to all orders. Our proposal has been first verified to match the existing semi-analytical results with non-Gaussianity, and then applied to more general cases, including high-order primordial non-Gaussianities, the logarithmic dependence in curvature perturbations, the curvaton model, and the ultra slow-roll model. We find that even a modest non-Gaussianity can significantly alter ultraviolet behaviors in SIGW spectra, necessitating special cautions in future detections as well as mutual constraints on/from primordial black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes lattice simulations to directly compute the energy density spectra of scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs) including non-Gaussianity to all orders. The method is first verified against existing semi-analytic results for cases with non-Gaussianity and then applied to more general scenarios, including high-order primordial non-Gaussianities, logarithmic dependence in curvature perturbations, the curvaton model, and the ultra slow-roll model. The central finding is that even modest non-Gaussianity can significantly alter the ultraviolet behaviors of SIGW spectra, with implications for future detections and constraints involving primordial black holes.

Significance. If the lattice results are robust against numerical artifacts, the work provides a practical tool for handling all-order non-Gaussian effects in SIGW calculations beyond perturbative limits. This is relevant for interpreting potential signals in future gravitational-wave observatories and for mutual constraints with primordial black hole abundance, as the UV tail directly influences detectability and PBH formation thresholds.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical methods / verification] Numerical methods section (or equivalent): verification is reported only against semi-analytic results for selected low-order non-Gaussian cases. Lattice simulations of second-order tensor modes are susceptible to dispersion errors, aliasing, and finite-volume effects that are strongest at high wavenumbers; without explicit convergence tests on resolution and box size for the all-order cases, it is unclear whether the reported UV enhancements are physical or numerical.
  2. [Results / curvaton and ultra-slow-roll examples] Results for curvaton and ultra-slow-roll models: the claim that modest non-Gaussianity significantly alters UV behaviors rests on the assumption that the lattice faithfully captures all orders without resolution-dependent biases. The skeptic note highlights that such effects are known to contaminate the UV tail; additional runs with refined grids or larger volumes are needed to confirm the enhancements survive.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the method was 'first verified to match the existing semi-analytical results with non-Gaussianity' would benefit from specifying the exact orders and parameter ranges used in the verification step.
  2. [Throughout / results] Notation: clarify how 'modest non-Gaussianity' is quantified (e.g., specific values of f_NL or higher-order parameters) when stating its impact on the UV spectrum.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments on numerical robustness. We address each major point below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the presentation of our lattice results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Numerical methods section (or equivalent): verification is reported only against semi-analytic results for selected low-order non-Gaussian cases. Lattice simulations of second-order tensor modes are susceptible to dispersion errors, aliasing, and finite-volume effects that are strongest at high wavenumbers; without explicit convergence tests on resolution and box size for the all-order cases, it is unclear whether the reported UV enhancements are physical or numerical.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence tests are essential to establish that the UV enhancements are physical rather than numerical artifacts. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection presenting resolution and volume convergence studies for the all-order non-Gaussian runs. These tests show that the reported UV spectral features remain stable when the grid spacing is halved and the box size is doubled, and we discuss how our numerical scheme and filtering suppress dispersion and aliasing at the wavenumbers of interest. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results for curvaton and ultra-slow-roll models: the claim that modest non-Gaussianity significantly alters UV behaviors rests on the assumption that the lattice faithfully captures all orders without resolution-dependent biases. The skeptic note highlights that such effects are known to contaminate the UV tail; additional runs with refined grids or larger volumes are needed to confirm the enhancements survive.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of verifying robustness specifically for the curvaton and ultra-slow-roll examples. We have therefore carried out additional simulations with refined grids and increased volumes for both models. The revised manuscript includes these results, which confirm that the UV modifications persist and are not removed by the higher-resolution runs. We have also expanded the text to address potential UV contamination and why our setup mitigates it. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct lattice simulation with independent semi-analytic validation

full rationale

The paper performs direct numerical lattice simulations of SIGW spectra including non-Gaussianity to all orders. It first verifies the method by matching existing semi-analytic results for selected low-order cases, then applies the same numerical procedure to higher-order and model-specific cases (curvaton, ultra-slow-roll). No derivation step reduces by construction to fitted parameters, self-defined quantities, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the central results are outputs of the lattice evolution rather than rearrangements of its inputs. The approach is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives a null circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that lattice discretization faithfully reproduces the continuum limit for the non-Gaussian scalar field evolution and the subsequent tensor mode sourcing; no explicit free parameters are listed in the abstract, but the models (curvaton, ultra slow-roll) typically introduce several.

free parameters (1)
  • lattice resolution and box size
    Numerical parameters that control ultraviolet cutoff and infrared modes; their convergence must be demonstrated for the claimed UV spectral changes.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The scalar field perturbations evolve according to the standard inflationary action plus the chosen non-Gaussian initial conditions.
    Standard assumption in SIGW calculations; invoked when setting up the lattice initial conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1267 out tokens · 29060 ms · 2026-05-18T22:55:25.788760+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonperturbative stochastic inflation in perturbative dynamical background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives stochastic equations from Schwinger-Keldysh formalism that include quantum diffusion and classical metric perturbations for non-perturbative ultra-slow-roll inflation, validated on Starobinsky and critical Hig...

  2. Probing non-Gaussianity during reheating with SIGW in the LISA band

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Non-standard reheating imprints detectable features on SIGW spectra via non-Gaussianity, with dynamics that can suppress or boost the signal amplitude for LISA.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 25 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations

    Daniel Baumann, Paul J. Steinhardt, Keitaro Takahashi, and Kiyotomo Ichiki, “Gravitational Wave Spectrum In- duced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 084019 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0703290

  2. [2]

    The cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations

    Kishore N. Ananda, Chris Clarkson, and David Wands, “The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 75, 123518 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612013

  3. [3]

    Scalar induced gravitational waves review

    Guillem Dom` enech, “Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,” Universe 7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr- qc]

  4. [4]

    Gravitational wave background as a probe of the primordial black hole abundance

    Ryo Saito and Jun’ichi Yokoyama, “Gravitational wave background as a probe of the primordial black hole abun- dance,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 161101 (2009), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 107, 069901 (2011)], arXiv:0812.4339 [astro-ph]

  5. [5]

    Gravitational-Wave Constraints on the Abundance of Primordial Black Holes

    Ryo Saito and Jun’ichi Yokoyama, “Gravitational- Wave Constraints on the Abundance of Primordial Black Holes,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 123, 867–886 (2010), [Erratum: Prog.Theor.Phys. 126, 351–352 (2011)], arXiv:0912.5317 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [6]

    Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter,

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky, and I. Novikov, “Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 50, 7173–7178 (1994)

  7. [7]

    Black hole constraints on the running mass inflation model,

    Samuel M. Leach, Ian J. Grivell, and Andrew R. Lid- dle, “Black hole constraints on the running mass inflation model,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 043516 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/0004296

  8. [8]

    Observable Spectra of Induced Gravitational Waves from Inflation

    Laila Alabidi, Kazunori Kohri, Misao Sasaki, and Yu- uiti Sendouda, “Observable Spectra of Induced Gravi- tational Waves from Inflation,” JCAP 09, 017 (2012), arXiv:1203.4663 [astro-ph.CO]

  9. [9]

    Primordial black hole dark matter from single field inflation

    Guillermo Ballesteros and Marco Taoso, “Primordial black hole dark matter from single field inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 023501 (2018), arXiv:1709.05565 [hep-ph]

  10. [10]

    Ballesteros, J

    Guillermo Ballesteros, Juli´ an Rey, Marco Taoso, and Alfredo Urbano, “Primordial black holes as dark matter and gravitational waves from single-field polynomial in- flation,” JCAP 07, 025 (2020), arXiv:2001.08220 [astro- ph.CO]

  11. [11]

    On primordial black holes from an inflection point

    Cristiano Germani and Tomislav Prokopec, “On primor- dial black holes from an inflection point,” Phys. Dark Univ. 18, 6–10 (2017), arXiv:1706.04226 [astro-ph.CO]

  12. [12]

    Primor- dial black holes dark matter from inflection point models of inflation and the effects of reheating,

    Nilanjandev Bhaumik and Rajeev Kumar Jain, “Primor- dial black holes dark matter from inflection point models of inflation and the effects of reheating,” JCAP 01, 037 (2020), arXiv:1907.04125 [astro-ph.CO]

  13. [13]

    Ragavendra, P

    H. V. Ragavendra, Pankaj Saha, L. Sriramkumar, and Joseph Silk, “Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from ultraslow roll and punctu- ated inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 083510 (2021), arXiv:2008.12202 [astro-ph.CO]

  14. [14]

    Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation

    Juan Garcia-Bellido and Ester Ruiz Morales, “Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation,” Phys. Dark Univ. 18, 47–54 (2017), arXiv:1702.03901 [astro- ph.CO]

  15. [15]

    Generating the curvature perturbation without an inflaton

    David H. Lyth and David Wands, “Generating the cur- vature perturbation without an inflaton,” Phys. Lett. B 524, 5–14 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0110002

  16. [16]

    Adiabatic CMB perturbations in pre-big bang string cosmology

    Kari Enqvist and Martin S. Sloth, “Adiabatic CMB per- turbations in pre - big bang string cosmology,” Nucl. Phys. B 626, 395–409 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0109214

  17. [17]

    Effects of cos- mological moduli fields on cosmic microwave back- ground,

    Takeo Moroi and Tomo Takahashi, “Effects of cos- mological moduli fields on cosmic microwave back- ground,” Phys. Lett. B 522, 215–221 (2001), [Erra- tum: Phys.Lett.B 539, 303–303 (2002)], arXiv:hep- ph/0110096

  18. [18]

    The Primordial density perturbation in the curvaton scenario,

    David H. Lyth, Carlo Ungarelli, and David Wands, “The Primordial density perturbation in the curvaton scenario,” Phys. Rev. D 67, 023503 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0208055

  19. [19]

    Non- Gaussianity of the primordial perturbation in the curva- ton model,

    Misao Sasaki, Jussi Valiviita, and David Wands, “Non- Gaussianity of the primordial perturbation in the curva- ton model,” Phys. Rev. D74, 103003 (2006), arXiv:astro- 6 ph/0607627

  20. [20]

    Pi and M

    Shi Pi and Misao Sasaki, “Primordial black hole forma- tion in nonminimal curvaton scenarios,” Phys. Rev. D 108, L101301 (2023), arXiv:2112.12680 [astro-ph.CO]

  21. [21]

    Reconstructing primordial curvature perturba- tions via scalar-induced gravitational waves with LISA,

    Jonas El Gammal et al. (LISA Cosmology Working Group), “Reconstructing primordial curvature perturba- tions via scalar-induced gravitational waves with LISA,” JCAP 05, 062 (2025), arXiv:2501.11320 [astro-ph.CO]

  22. [22]

    The Three point correlation func- tion of the cosmic microwave background in inflationary models,

    Alejandro Gangui, Francesco Lucchin, Sabino Matarrese, and Silvia Mollerach, “The Three point correlation func- tion of the cosmic microwave background in inflationary models,” Astrophys. J. 430, 447–457 (1994), arXiv:astro- ph/9312033

  23. [23]

    Acoustic Signatures in the Primary Microwave Background Bispectrum

    Eiichiro Komatsu and David N. Spergel, “Acoustic signa- tures in the primary microwave background bispectrum,” Phys. Rev. D63, 063002 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0005036

  24. [24]

    Semianalytic Calculation of Gravitational Wave Spectrum Nonlinearly Induced from Primordial Curvature Perturbations

    Kazunori Kohri and Takahiro Terada, “Semianalytic cal- culation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly in- duced from primordial curvature perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 123532 (2018), arXiv:1804.08577 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    A Cosmological Signature of the SM Higgs Instability: Gravitational Waves

    Jos´ e Ram´ on Espinosa, Davide Racco, and Antonio Ri- otto, “A Cosmological Signature of the SM Higgs In- stability: Gravitational Waves,” JCAP 09, 012 (2018), arXiv:1804.07732 [hep-ph]

  26. [26]

    Gravitational Waves Induced by non-Gaussian Scalar Perturbations

    Rong-gen Cai, Shi Pi, and Misao Sasaki, “Gravitational Waves Induced by non-Gaussian Scalar Perturbations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 201101 (2019), arXiv:1810.11000 [astro-ph.CO]

  27. [27]

    Unal, Imprints of Primordial Non-Gaussianity on Gravitational Wave Spectrum, Phys

    Caner Unal, “Imprints of Primordial Non-Gaussianity on Gravitational Wave Spectrum,” Phys. Rev. D99, 041301 (2019), arXiv:1811.09151 [astro-ph.CO]

  28. [28]

    Adshead, K

    Peter Adshead, Kaloian D. Lozanov, and Zachary J. Weiner, “Non-Gaussianity and the induced gravita- tional wave background,” JCAP 10, 080 (2021), arXiv:2105.01659 [astro-ph.CO]

  29. [29]

    Complete analysis of the background and anisotropies of scalar-induced gravitational waves: pri- mordial non-Gaussianity f N L and g N L considered,

    Jun-Peng Li, Sai Wang, Zhi-Chao Zhao, and Kazunori Kohri, “Complete analysis of the background and anisotropies of scalar-induced gravitational waves: pri- mordial non-Gaussianity f N L and g N L considered,” JCAP 06, 039 (2024), arXiv:2309.07792 [astro-ph.CO]

  30. [30]

    Yuan, D.-S

    Chen Yuan, De-Shuang Meng, and Qing-Guo Huang, “Full analysis of the scalar-induced gravitational waves for the curvature perturbation with local-type non- Gaussianities,” JCAP 12, 036 (2023), arXiv:2308.07155 [astro-ph.CO]

  31. [31]

    Isotropy, anisotropies and non-Gaussianity in the scalar-induced gravitational-wave background: diagrammatic approach for primordial non-Gaussianity up to arbitrary order

    Jun-Peng Li, Sai Wang, Zhi-Chao Zhao, and Kazunori Kohri, “The isotropy, anisotropies and non-Gaussianity of the scalar-induced gravitational-wave background: di- agrammatic approach for primordial non-Gaussianity up to any order,” (2025), arXiv:2505.16820 [astro-ph.CO]

  32. [32]

    Perna, C

    Gabriele Perna, Chiara Testini, Angelo Ricciardone, and Sabino Matarrese, “Fully non-Gaussian Scalar- Induced Gravitational Waves,” JCAP 05, 086 (2024), arXiv:2403.06962 [astro-ph.CO]

  33. [33]

    Zhou, Z.-C

    Jing-Zhi Zhou, Zhi-Chao Li, and Di Wu, “Cosmological constraints on small-scale primordial non-Gaussianity,” (2025), arXiv:2505.22614 [astro-ph.CO]

  34. [34]

    Luo, Y.-H

    Di Luo, Yan-Heng Yu, Jun-Peng Li, and Sai Wang, “Isotropic background and anisotropies of gravitational waves induced by cosmological soliton isocurvature per- turbations,” JCAP 04, 085 (2025), arXiv:2501.02965 [astro-ph.CO]

  35. [35]

    Effects of scalar non-Gaussianity on induced scalar-tensor gravita- tional waves,

    Rapha¨ el Picard and Matthew W. Davies, “Effects of scalar non-Gaussianity on induced scalar-tensor gravita- tional waves,” JCAP 02, 037 (2025), arXiv:2410.17819 [astro-ph.CO]

  36. [36]

    Anisotropies of cosmological gravita- tional wave backgrounds in non-flat spacetime,

    Rong-Gen Cai, Shao-Jiang Wang, Zi-Yan Yuwen, and Xiang-Xi Zeng, “Anisotropies of cosmological gravita- tional wave backgrounds in non-flat spacetime,” JCAP 01, 011 (2025), arXiv:2410.17721 [astro-ph.CO]

  37. [37]

    Han, Z.-C

    Chang Han, Zu-Cheng Chen, Hongwei Yu, and Puxun Wu, “Infrared behavior of induced gravitational waves from isocurvature perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 123553 (2025), arXiv:2501.09939 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Pearce, L

    Matthew Pearce, Lauren Pearce, Graham White, and Csaba Bal´ azs, “Using Gravitational Wave Signals to Disentangle Early Matter Dominated Epochs,” (2025), arXiv:2503.03101 [astro-ph.CO]

  39. [39]

    Cecchini, G

    Chiara Cecchini, Gabriele Franciolini, and Mauro Pieroni, “Forecasting constraints on scalar-induced gravitational waves with future pulsar timing ar- ray observations,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 123536 (2025), arXiv:2503.10805 [astro-ph.CO]

  40. [40]

    Dom` enech and J

    Guillem Dom` enech and Jens Chluba, “Regularizing the induced GW spectrum with dissipative effects,” (2025), arXiv:2503.13670 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    Can the poltergeist mechanism produce observ- able GWs?

    Zhen-Min Zeng, Cheng-Jun Fang, and Zong-Kuan Guo, “Can the poltergeist mechanism produce observ- able GWs?” (2025), arXiv:2504.01397 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Yu and S

    Yan-Heng Yu and Sai Wang, “Large anisotropies in the gravitational wave background from baryogenesis,” (2025), arXiv:2504.07838 [astro-ph.CO]

  43. [43]

    Chianese, G

    Marco Chianese, Guillem Dom` enech, Theodoros Pa- panikolaou, Rome Samanta, and Ninetta Saviano, “In- duced Gravitational Waves as Cosmic Tracers of Lepto- genesis,” (2025), arXiv:2504.20135 [hep-ph]

  44. [44]

    Ghaleb, A

    Aya Ghaleb, Ameek Malhotra, Gianmassimo Tasinato, and Ivonne Zavala, “Bayesian reconstruction of primor- dial perturbations from induced gravitational waves,” (2025), arXiv:2505.22534 [astro-ph.CO]

  45. [45]

    Implications for the non-Gaussianity of primordial gravitational waves from pulsar timing arrays,

    Zhi-Zhang Peng, You Wu, and Lang Liu, “Implications for the non-Gaussianity of primordial gravitational waves from pulsar timing arrays,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 103506 (2025), arXiv:2412.19196 [astro-ph.CO]

  46. [46]

    ¨Ozsoy and G

    Ogan ¨Ozsoy and Gianmassimo Tasinato, “Inflation and Primordial Black Holes,” Universe 9, 203 (2023), arXiv:2301.03600 [astro-ph.CO]

  47. [47]

    Primordial black holes as a tool for constraining non-Gaussianity

    Christian T. Byrnes, Edmund J. Copeland, and Anne M. Green, “Primordial black holes as a tool for constrain- ing non-Gaussianity,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 043512 (2012), arXiv:1206.4188 [astro-ph.CO]

  48. [48]

    Primordial black holes in non-Gaussian regimes

    Sam Young and Christian T. Byrnes, “Primordial black holes in non-Gaussian regimes,” JCAP 08, 052 (2013), arXiv:1307.4995 [astro-ph.CO]

  49. [49]

    The formation probability of primordial black holes,

    Matteo Biagetti, Valerio De Luca, Gabriele Franciolini, Alex Kehagias, and Antonio Riotto, “The formation probability of primordial black holes,” Phys. Lett. B820, 136602 (2021), arXiv:2105.07810 [astro-ph.CO]

  50. [50]

    The role of non-gaussianities in Primordial Black Hole formation

    Vicente Atal and Cristiano Germani, “The role of non- gaussianities in Primordial Black Hole formation,” Phys. Dark Univ. 24, 100275 (2019), arXiv:1811.07857 [astro- ph.CO]

  51. [51]

    Taoso and A

    Marco Taoso and Alfredo Urbano, “Non-gaussianities for primordial black hole formation,” JCAP 08, 016 (2021), arXiv:2102.03610 [astro-ph.CO]

  52. [52]

    Young,Peaks and primordial black holes: the effect of non-Gaussianity,JCAP05(2022) 037 [2201.13345]

    Sam Young, “Peaks and primordial black holes: the ef- fect of non-Gaussianity,” JCAP 05, 037 (2022), 7 arXiv:2201.13345 [astro-ph.CO]

  53. [53]

    Ferrante, G

    Giacomo Ferrante, Gabriele Franciolini, Antonio Iovino, Junior., and Alfredo Urbano, “Primordial non- Gaussianity up to all orders: Theoretical aspects and im- plications for primordial black hole models,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 043520 (2023), arXiv:2211.01728 [astro-ph.CO]

  54. [54]

    Non-perturbative non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes,

    Andrew D. Gow, Hooshyar Assadullahi, Joseph H. P. Jackson, Kazuya Koyama, Vincent Vennin, and David Wands, “Non-perturbative non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes,” EPL 142, 49001 (2023), arXiv:2211.08348 [astro-ph.CO]

  55. [55]

    Iovino, S

    A. J. Iovino, S. Matarrese, G. Perna, A. Ricciardone, and A. Riotto, “How Well Do We Know the Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves?” (2024), arXiv:2412.06764 [astro- ph.CO]

  56. [56]

    Fernandez, J.W

    Nicolas Fernandez, Joshua W. Foster, Benjamin Lillard, and Jessie Shelton, “Stochastic Gravitational Waves from Early Structure Formation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 111002 (2024), arXiv:2312.12499 [astro-ph.CO]

  57. [57]

    Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2005)

    V. Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2005)

  58. [58]

    A Gravitational Wave Background from Reheating after Hybrid Inflation

    Juan Garcia-Bellido, Daniel G. Figueroa, and Alfonso Sastre, “A Gravitational Wave Background from Reheat- ing after Hybrid Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 043517 (2008), arXiv:0707.0839 [hep-ph]

  59. [59]

    Theory and Numerics of Gravitational Waves from Preheating after Inflation

    Jean Francois Dufaux, Amanda Bergman, Gary N. Felder, Lev Kofman, and Jean-Philippe Uzan, “The- ory and Numerics of Gravitational Waves from Preheat- ing after Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 123517 (2007), arXiv:0707.0875 [astro-ph]

  60. [60]

    On the Transverse-Traceless Projection in Lattice Simulations of Gravitational Wave Production

    Daniel G. Figueroa, Juan Garcia-Bellido, and Arttu Rajantie, “On the Transverse-Traceless Projection in Lattice Simulations of Gravitational Wave Production,” JCAP 11, 015 (2011), arXiv:1110.0337 [astro-ph.CO]

  61. [61]

    Peter , title =

    G. Peter Lepage, “Adaptive multidimensional integra- tion: VEGAS enhanced,” J. Comput. Phys. 439, 110386 (2021), arXiv:2009.05112 [physics.comp-ph]

  62. [62]

    Pi and M

    Shi Pi and Misao Sasaki, “Logarithmic Duality of the Curvature Perturbation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 011002 (2023), arXiv:2211.13932 [astro-ph.CO]

  63. [63]

    Cai, X.-H

    Yi-Fu Cai, Xiao-Han Ma, Misao Sasaki, Dong-Gang Wang, and Zihan Zhou, “Highly non-Gaussian tails and primordial black holes from single-field inflation,” JCAP 12, 034 (2022), arXiv:2207.11910 [astro-ph.CO]

  64. [64]

    Zeng, R.-G

    Xiang-Xi Zeng, Rong-Gen Cai, and Shao-Jiang Wang, “Multiple peaks in gravitational waves induced from pri- mordial curvature perturbations with non-Gaussianity,” JCAP 10, 045 (2024), arXiv:2406.05034 [astro-ph.CO]

  65. [65]

    Resonant multiple peaks in the induced gravitational waves

    Rong-Gen Cai, Shi Pi, Shao-Jiang Wang, and Xing-Yu Yang, “Resonant multiple peaks in the induced gravita- tional waves,” JCAP 05, 013 (2019), arXiv:1901.10152 [astro-ph.CO]

  66. [66]

    Primor- dial black hole formation from the upward step model: Avoiding overproduction,

    Xiaoding Wang, Xiao-Han Ma, and Yi-Fu Cai, “Primor- dial black hole formation from the upward step model: Avoiding overproduction,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 34, 2550027 (2025), arXiv:2412.19631 [astro-ph.CO]

  67. [67]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pau Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA), “Laser Interferome- ter Space Antenna,” (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

  68. [68]

    The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,

    Wen-Rui Hu and Yue-Liang Wu, “The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,” Natl. Sci. Rev. 4, 685–686 (2017)

  69. [69]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    Wen-Hong Ruan, Zong-Kuan Guo, Rong-Gen Cai, and Yuan-Zhong Zhang, “Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2050075 (2020), arXiv:1807.09495 [gr-qc]

  70. [70]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    Jun Luo et al. (TianQin), “TianQin: a space-borne grav- itational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

  71. [71]

    Caravano, K

    Angelo Caravano, Keisuke Inomata, and S´ ebastien Renaux-Petel, “Inflationary Butterfly Effect: Nonper- turbative Dynamics from Small-Scale Features,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 151001 (2024), arXiv:2403.12811 [astro- ph.CO]

  72. [72]

    Caravano, G

    Angelo Caravano, Gabriele Franciolini, and S´ ebastien Renaux-Petel, “Ultraslow-roll inflation on the lattice: Backreaction and nonlinear effects,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 063518 (2025), arXiv:2410.23942 [astro-ph.CO]

  73. [73]

    Caravano, G

    Angelo Caravano, Gabriele Franciolini, and S´ ebastien Renaux-Petel, “Ultra-Slow-Roll Inflation on the Lattice II: Nonperturbative Curvature Perturbation,” (2025), arXiv:2506.11795 [astro-ph.CO]

  74. [74]

    Simulating scalar-induced gravitational waves: the isocurvature case

    Xiang-Xi Zeng, “Simulating scalar-induced gravitational waves: the isocurvature case.” to appear

  75. [75]

    Dom` enech, S

    Guillem Dom` enech, Samuel Passaglia, and S´ ebastien Renaux-Petel, “Gravitational waves from dark matter isocurvature,” JCAP 03, 023 (2022), arXiv:2112.10163 [astro-ph.CO]

  76. [76]

    Dom` enech, C

    Guillem Dom` enech, Chunshan Lin, and Misao Sasaki, “Gravitational wave constraints on the primordial black hole dominated early universe,” JCAP 04, 062 (2021), [Erratum: JCAP 11, E01 (2021)], arXiv:2012.08151 [gr- qc]

  77. [77]

    Evolution of Isocur- vature Perturbations. 2. Radiation Dust Universe,

    Hideo Kodama and Misao Sasaki, “Evolution of Isocur- vature Perturbations. 2. Radiation Dust Universe,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2, 491 (1987)

  78. [78]

    Dom` enech,Cosmological gravitational waves from isocurvature fluctuations,AAPPS Bull

    Guillem Dom` enech, “Cosmological gravitational waves from isocurvature fluctuations,” AAPPS Bull. 34, 4 (2024), arXiv:2311.02065 [gr-qc]

  79. [79]

    Analytic solutions of scalar perturba- tions induced by scalar perturbations,

    Keisuke Inomata, “Analytic solutions of scalar perturba- tions induced by scalar perturbations,” JCAP 03, 013 (2021), arXiv:2008.12300 [gr-qc]

  80. [80]

    De Luca, A

    Valerio De Luca, Alex Kehagias, and Antonio Riotto, “How well do we know the primordial black hole abun- dance: The crucial role of nonlinearities when approach- ing the horizon,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 063531 (2023), arXiv:2307.13633 [astro-ph.CO]. 8 Supplemental Material: Scalar-induced gravitational waves with non-Gaussianity up to all orders Xiang-Xi Zeng ...