Diversity-enhanced Collaborative Mamba for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation

Jian Zhang; Lei Qi; Luping Zhou; Shumeng Li; Yang Gao; Yinghuan Shi

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 2 cited by

Diversity-enhanced Collaborative Mamba for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read DCMamba pushes semi-supervised medical segmentation past the latest SSM-based method by 6.69% on Synapse with 20% labeled data.

desk verdict The abstract outlines a plausible Mamba-based semi-supervised segmentation method, but the supplied full text is the wrong paper, and the 6.69% claim is too thin to verify on its own. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.13712 v1 pith:6LPCS54M submitted 2025-08-19 cs.CV

Shumeng Li , Jian Zhang , Lei Qi , Luping Zhou , Yinghuan Shi , Yang Gao This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CV

keywords semi-supervisedlearningmedicalimagesegmentationMambastatespacemodelsweak-strongaugmentationcontrastivepseudolabelsSynapse

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes DCMamba, a semi-supervised framework for medical image segmentation that leverages unlabeled data more effectively by injecting diversity at three levels: data, network, and features. The claim is that this engineering of diversity lets a state-space-model backbone (Mamba) outperform existing semi-supervised methods, with a reported 6.69% improvement over the latest SSM-based method on the Synapse dataset using only 20% labeled data. A sympathetic reader would care because medical annotation is expensive, and a method that extracts more from unlabeled images could reduce annotation burden in clinical segmentation tasks.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the Diversity-enhanced Collaborative Mamba framework, which unites a state space model backbone (Mamba) with three diversity-oriented components: patch-level weak-strong mixing augmentation designed around Mamba's scanning pattern, a diverse-scan collaboration module that aggregates predictions from multiple scanning directions to benefit from their disagreements, and an uncertainty-weighted contrastive learning loss that sharpens feature diversity. Together these components are meant to turn unlabeled data into reliable training signal through better pseudo labels and more robust representations.

What would settle it

Reproduce the comparison on the Synapse dataset using exactly the same 20% labeled-data split, augmentation policy, pseudo-label threshold, and training iterations for both DCMamba and the named SSM-based baseline; if the performance gap is materially smaller than 6.69%, the headline claim is not reproducible.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a collaborative Mamba framework built around three complementary diversity mechanisms—patch-level weak-strong mixing augmentation that plays to Mamba's scanning behavior, a diverse-scan collaboration module that exploits prediction discrepancies between different scanning directions, and uncertainty-weighted contrastive learning that enriches feature representations—achieves state-of-the-art semi-supervised medical image segmentation. The authors state that DCMamba 'significantly outperforms' other semi-supervised medical image segmentation methods, citing the specific margin of 6.69% over the latest SSM-based method on the Synapse dataset under a 20% labeled-data budget.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 6.69% improvement over the latest SSM-based method was measured against a baseline trained and evaluated under identical conditions—same labeled subset, same preprocessing, same augmentation, and same training budget—so the only difference was the proposed framework.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the 6.69% margin holds under matched conditions, state-space-model backbones become a competitive choice for semi-supervised medical segmentation, not just for efficiency but for accuracy.
The three-level diversity recipe (data, network, feature) provides a transferable design pattern for other semi-supervised dense prediction tasks that use unlabeled data.
The reported Synapse result suggests that patch-level weak-strong augmentation, tailored to scan-based models, can yield meaningful gains even when only a fifth of the labels are available.
The uncertainty-weighted contrastive mechanism implies that feature-level regularization can work alongside pseudo-labeling to stabilize training in semi-supervised settings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The diversity mechanisms are not inherently tied to Mamba; a similar patch-level mixing and multi-branch disagreement strategy could plausibly boost Transformer or CNN segmenters, though the paper does not test this.
The uncertainty-weighted contrastive learning component may generalize beyond segmentation to other tasks with imbalanced or noisy pseudo labels, such as semi-supervised detection or classification, but this is an editorial extrapolation.
A meaningful next test is ablating the three components independently on a second dataset (e.g., a cardiac or brain MRI benchmark) to see whether the Synapse margin is driven by one component or by their combination.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First, the abstract outlines a genuinely coherent combination for semi-supervised medical image segmentation: a Mamba backbone with patch-level weak-strong mixing, a diverse-scan collaboration module, and uncertainty-weighted contrastive learning. That is a sensible use of Mamba's scanning directions, and it is not, as far as I can tell from the abstract, a reinvention of an existing method. Second, the full text I was sent is not this paper. It is a quantum optics paper about twisted atom lasers (arXiv:2508.13711). So I cannot audit the implementation, the ablations, or the numbers. Everything below is based on the abstract.

What the paper does well, on paper: the three diversity mechanisms target different levels—data, network, and feature—and the argument that prediction disagreements between scan directions can serve as a training signal is reasonable. The experiments are on a public benchmark (Synapse), so the evaluation is externally grounded. No circular derivation is involved.

The soft spots are proportionate to the evidence. The headline claim—6.69% over the 'latest SSM-based method' on Synapse with 20% labeled data—is presented without naming the baseline, without error bars, and without saying whether the labeled subset and training budget were matched. That is a load-bearing omission. If the baseline was undertuned or the label split differed, the margin could shrink or reverse. More importantly, the supplied full text mismatch means I cannot check even the basic existence of the ablations. This is not an internal inconsistency in the abstract; the abstract could be perfectly accurate. But a reviewer needs the actual manuscript.

The reader's scores seem fair: significance around 6, novelty around 6. The paper appears to be a plausible incremental contribution to a subfield that cares about annotation efficiency. It does not reshape a major branch of science.

Who is this for? Researchers working on semi-supervised medical image segmentation, particularly those using state space models. If the correct manuscript is supplied, this deserves a serious referee. As it stands, the editor should not desk-reject the idea, but also cannot act on the abstract alone.

My recommendation: get the correct full text. If it matches the abstract in scope and has the missing baseline details, send it to peer review. If the correct manuscript cannot be produced, the absence of auditable content is grounds for a different decision.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as submitted, consists of an abstract claiming a novel framework called DCMamba for semi-supervised medical image segmentation, plus a full text that is actually a different paper: 'Towards a Twisted Atom Laser: Cold Atoms Released from Helical Optical Tube Potentials' (arXiv:2508.13711, quant-ph). The abstract describes three technical contributions (patch-level weak-strong mixing augmentation, a diverse-scan collaboration module, and uncertainty-weighted contrastive learning) and reports a headline result of a 6.69% improvement over an unnamed 'latest SSM-based method' on the Synapse dataset with 20% labeled data. The supplied full text contains none of the DCMamba content: no architecture details, no formulas, no implementation, no experimental setup, no ablation, and no results for medical image segmentation.

Significance. If the claimed 6.69% improvement over a well-matched SSM-based baseline on Synapse at 20% labeled data were supported by a complete and reproducible manuscript, it would be a substantive contribution to semi-supervised medical image segmentation, particularly given the growing interest in Mamba-style state space models for long-range dependencies. However, the significance cannot currently be evaluated because the manuscript text provided does not correspond to the claimed paper. There is no machine-checkable proof, no released code, no ablation, and no statistical characterization of the headline result. The abstract alone does not establish the method's validity or the strength of the comparison.

major comments (3)

[Full text (all sections)] The supplied full text is not the manuscript under review: it is a quantum-optics paper on twisted atom lasers (arXiv:2508.13711), not a computer-vision paper on DCMamba. Consequently, every claimed contribution—the patch-level weak-strong mixing augmentation, the diverse-scan collaboration module, and the uncertainty-weighted contrastive learning mechanism—is entirely unverifiable. No equation, algorithm, network architecture, training procedure, or experimental protocol appears in the provided text. This is a load-bearing deficiency that prevents any assessment of the central claim.
[Abstract] The headline claim that DCMamba outperforms 'the latest SSM-based method' by 6.69% on Synapse with 20% labeled data is not backed by any detail in the available manuscript. The baseline method is not named, the labeled split is not specified, and no error bars, number of runs, statistical tests, or evaluation protocol are provided. Without a matched comparison (same training subset, augmentation, backbone, iteration budget, and inference protocol), the 6.69% figure cannot be interpreted; a mismatched baseline could account for a large part of the apparent advantage.
[Experimental section (absent)] There is no experimental section anywhere in the supplied text. The paper therefore provides no evidence that DCMamba was implemented as described, no quantitative comparisons on any dataset (Synapse, ACDC, or other), no ablation of the three proposed modules, and no analysis of computational cost or convergence. The abstract's performance claims are unsupported by any data that the reader can inspect.

minor comments (1)

[Title/author list] The title and author list of the supplied full text differ completely from those implied by the abstract; even if the full text were a correct submission, the metadata mismatch would need to be resolved.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DCMamba claim is an external benchmark comparison, not a derivation from its own inputs.

full rationale

The abstract of arXiv:2508.13712 makes an empirical state-of-the-art claim against external semi-supervised medical image segmentation methods on the Synapse benchmark. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivation chain are presented in the abstract that could reduce to inputs by construction. The 6.69% improvement over the unnamed SSM baseline is a measurement claim requiring matched experimental conditions, but an uncontrolled or unverifiable baseline is a reproducibility and correctness concern, not circularity. The supplied full text is actually arXiv:2508.13711, an unrelated quantum-optics article, so the DCMamba manuscript's experimental section cannot be inspected; however, nothing in the available text suggests that a predicted quantity is defined in terms of the data it predicts or that a self-citation is doing load-bearing work. The 'diversity' components are descriptive design choices, not self-referential definitions. The supplied full text also contains placeholder metadata in the unrelated paper ('formal analysis, X.X.' and 'Funding: Please add'), but those are completeness defects of a different article and are not circularity evidence. Therefore no circular step is identified and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are identifiable from the abstract; the method's hyperparameters and loss weights are not reported. No new physical entities are proposed; the three modules (patch-level mixing, diverse-scan collaboration, uncertainty-weighted contrastive learning) are algorithmic components, not independent entities with falsifiable handles outside the paper. The core assumptions are the validity of the benchmark and the fair comparison to an unnamed baseline.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The Synapse dataset and its standard segmentation metrics are valid benchmarks for semi-supervised medical image segmentation.
The abstract reports comparisons on Synapse with 20% labeled data; the validity of this benchmark and metric is assumed.
domain assumption The 'latest SSM-based method' is a well-defined prior method with a comparable experimental setup.
The abstract does not name the baseline, so the comparison assumes a fair and well-defined baseline exists.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diversity-enhanced Collaborative Mamba for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6LPCS54M

@misc{pith2026250813712,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diversity-enhanced Collaborative Mamba for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6LPCS54M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.13712}
}

read the original abstract

Acquiring high-quality annotated data for medical image segmentation is tedious and costly. Semi-supervised segmentation techniques alleviate this burden by leveraging unlabeled data to generate pseudo labels. Recently, advanced state space models, represented by Mamba, have shown efficient handling of long-range dependencies. This drives us to explore their potential in semi-supervised medical image segmentation. In this paper, we propose a novel Diversity-enhanced Collaborative Mamba framework (namely DCMamba) for semi-supervised medical image segmentation, which explores and utilizes the diversity from data, network, and feature perspectives. Firstly, from the data perspective, we develop patch-level weak-strong mixing augmentation with Mamba's scanning modeling characteristics. Moreover, from the network perspective, we introduce a diverse-scan collaboration module, which could benefit from the prediction discrepancies arising from different scanning directions. Furthermore, from the feature perspective, we adopt an uncertainty-weighted contrastive learning mechanism to enhance the diversity of feature representation. Experiments demonstrate that our DCMamba significantly outperforms other semi-supervised medical image segmentation methods, e.g., yielding the latest SSM-based method by 6.69% on the Synapse dataset with 20% labeled data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

VCDP: Variation-Conditioned Distributional Proxy Learning for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation
cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

VCDP improves semi-supervised 3D medical image segmentation by attaching a training-only module that models each organ class as a Gaussian proxy with multiple variation prototypes to regularize feature spaces.
Airy beams for radiative near-field communications: Fundamentals, potentials, and limitations
eess.SP 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

Airy beams can outperform Gaussian beams in certain non-line-of-sight near-field wireless channels if enough of the transmit aperture has a clear path to the receiver.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Advances in atomic physics: an overview 2011

Cohen-Tannoudji, C.; et al. Advances in atomic physics: an overview 2011

work page 2011
[2]

Atom optics; Vol

Meystre, P . Atom optics; Vol. 33, Springer Science & Business Media, 2001

work page 2001
[3]

T aming atoms: the renaissance of atomic physics; 2020

Lembessis, V .E. T aming atoms: the renaissance of atomic physics; 2020

work page 2020
[4]

Evaporative cooling of magnetically trapped and compressed spin-polarized hydrogen

Hess, H.F. Evaporative cooling of magnetically trapped and compressed spin-polarized hydrogen. Physical Review B 1986, 34, 3476

work page 1986
[5]

Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor

Anderson, M.H.; Ensher, J.R.; Matthews, M.R.; Wieman, C.E.; Cornell, E.A. Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor. science 1995, 269, 198–201

work page 1995
[6]

Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms

Davis, K.B.; Mewes, M.O.; Andrews, M.R.; van Druten, N.J.; Durfee, D.S.; Kurn, D.; Ketterle, W. Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms. Physical review letters 1995, 75, 3969

work page 1995
[7]

Strong atom–field coupling for Bose–Einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip

Colombe, Y.; Steinmetz, T.; Dubois, G.; Linke, F.; Hunger, D.; Reichel, J. Strong atom–field coupling for Bose–Einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip. Nature 2007, 450, 272–276

work page 2007
[8]

Atom lasers: Production, properties and prospects for precision inertial measurement

Robins, N.; Altin, P .; Debs, J.; Close, J. Atom lasers: Production, properties and prospects for precision inertial measurement. Physics Reports 2013, 529, 265–296

work page 2013

Show all 33 references

[9]

Quantum interferometric optical lithography: exploiting entanglement to beat the diffraction limit

Boto, A.N.; Kok, P .; Abrams, D.S.; Braunstein, S.L.; Williams, C.P .; Dowling, J.P . Quantum interferometric optical lithography: exploiting entanglement to beat the diffraction limit. Physical Review Letters 2000, 85, 2733

2000
[10]

Interferometric modulation of an atomic beam by an electric field: A phase hologram for atoms

Fujita, J.; Mitake, S.; Shimizu, F. Interferometric modulation of an atomic beam by an electric field: A phase hologram for atoms. Physical Review Letters 2000, 84, 4027

2000
[11]

Space-borne Bose–Einstein condensation for precision interferometry

Becker, D.; Lachmann, M.D.; Seidel, S.T.; Ahlers, H.; Dinkelaker, A.N.; Grosse, J.; Hellmig, O.; Müntinga, H.; Schkolnik, V .; Wendrich, T.; et al. Space-borne Bose–Einstein condensation for precision interferometry. Nature 2018, 562, 391–395

2018
[12]

Nonlinear atom optics

Lenz, G.; Meystre, P .; Wright, E.M. Nonlinear atom optics. Physical review letters 1993, 71, 3271

1993
[13]

Study of the spatial and temporal coherence of high-order harmonics

Salieres, P .; L’huillier, A.; Antoine, P .; Lewenstein, M. Study of the spatial and temporal coherence of high-order harmonics. In Advances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics ; Elsevier, 1999; Vol. 41, pp. 83–142

1999
[14]

Formation of a matter-wave bright soliton

Khaykovich, L.; Schreck, F.; Ferrari, G.; Bourdel, T.; Cubizolles, J.; Carr, L.D.; Castin, Y.; Salomon, C. Formation of a matter-wave bright soliton. Science 2002, 296, 1290–1293

2002
[15]

Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes

Allen, L.; Beijersbergen, M.W.; Spreeuw, R.; Woerdman, J. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Physical review A 1992, 45, 8185

1992
[16]

IV The orbital angular momentum of light

Allen, L.; Padgett, M.; Babiker, M. IV The orbital angular momentum of light. Progress in optics 1999, 39, 291–372

1999
[17]

Atoms in complex twisted light

Babiker, M.; Andrews, D.L.; Lembessis, V .E. Atoms in complex twisted light. Journal of Optics 2018, 21, 013001

2018
[18]

Optical ferris wheel for ultracold atoms

Franke-Arnold, S.; Leach, J.; Padgett, M.J.; Lembessis, V .E.; Ellinas, D.; Wright, A.J.; Girkin, J.M.; Öhberg, P .; Arnold, A.S. Optical ferris wheel for ultracold atoms. Optics Express 2007, 15, 8619–8625

2007
[19]

Optical Ferris wheels as a platform for collisional quantum gates

Lembessis, V .; Lyras, A.; Aldossary, O. Optical Ferris wheels as a platform for collisional quantum gates. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 2020, 38, 233–240

2020
[20]

Atomic Ferris wheel beams

Lembessis, V .E. Atomic Ferris wheel beams. Physical Review A 2017, 96, 013622

2017
[21]

Light masks for atom diffraction created from twisted beams with a Gaussian intensity envelope

Lembessis, V . Light masks for atom diffraction created from twisted beams with a Gaussian intensity envelope. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 2018, 35, 818–825

2018
[22]

Superfluid rotation sensor with helical laser trap

Okulov, A. Superfluid rotation sensor with helical laser trap. Journal of Low T emperature Physics 2013, 171, 397–407

2013
[23]

The self-induced motion of a helical vortex

Okulov, V .L.; Sørensen, J.N. The self-induced motion of a helical vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2020, 883, A5

2020
[24]

Quantum states of a two-level atom trapped in a helical optical tube

Lembessis, V .; Lyras, A.; Aldossary, O. Quantum states of a two-level atom trapped in a helical optical tube. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 2022, 39, 2319–2328. 13 of 13

2022
[25]

Rotating optical tubes for vertical transport of atoms

Al Rsheed, A.; Lyras, A.; Aldossary, O.M.; Lembessis, V .E. Rotating optical tubes for vertical transport of atoms. Physical Review A 2016, 94, 063423

2016
[26]

Guiding of atoms in helical optical potential structures

Al Rsheed, A.; Lyras, A.; Lembessis, V .E.; Aldossary, O.M. Guiding of atoms in helical optical potential structures. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 2016, 49, 125002

2016
[27]

A direct relaxation method for calculating eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the Schrödinger equation on a grid

Kosloff, R.; Tal-Ezer, H. A direct relaxation method for calculating eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the Schrödinger equation on a grid. Chemical Physics Letters 1986, 127, 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2 614(86)80262-7

1986 doi
[28]

Mayavi: 3D Visualization of Scientific Data

Ramachandran, P .; Varoquaux, G. Mayavi: 3D Visualization of Scientific Data. Computing in Science & Engineering 2011, 13, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.35

2011 doi
[29]

Chirality-enabled optical dipole potential energy for two-level atoms

Lembessis, V .E.; Koksal, K.; Yuan, J.; Babiker, M. Chirality-enabled optical dipole potential energy for two-level atoms. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 103, 013106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.013106

2021 doi
[30]

Optical Devices for Cold Atoms and Bose- Einstein Condensates

Gaaloul, N.; Jaouadi, A.; Telmini, M.; Pruvost, L.; Charron, E. Optical Devices for Cold Atoms and Bose- Einstein Condensates. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics, 2007, Vol. 935, pp. 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2795399

2007 doi
[31]

Controlled deflection of cold atomic clouds and of Bose-Einstein condensates

Gaaloul, N.; Jaouadi, A.; Pruvost, L.; Viaris de Lesegno, B.; Telmini, M.; Pruvost, L. Controlled deflection of cold atomic clouds and of Bose-Einstein condensates. The European Physical Journal D 2009, 53, 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2009-00130-9

2009 doi
[32]

Optically tuned soliton dynamics in Bose-Einstein condensates within dark traps

Célanie, E.; Delisle, L.; Jaouadi, A. Optically tuned soliton dynamics in Bose-Einstein condensates within dark traps. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 2024, 57, 485701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751 -8121/ad8d93

2024 doi
[33]

Symmetry-Driven Multi-Soliton Dynamics in Bose–Einstein Condensates in Reduced Dimensions

Delisle, L.; Jaouadi, A. Symmetry-Driven Multi-Soliton Dynamics in Bose–Einstein Condensates in Reduced Dimensions. Symmetry 2025, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17040582

2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Advances in atomic physics: an overview 2011

Cohen-Tannoudji, C.; et al. Advances in atomic physics: an overview 2011

work page 2011

[2] [2]

Atom optics; Vol

Meystre, P . Atom optics; Vol. 33, Springer Science & Business Media, 2001

work page 2001

[3] [3]

T aming atoms: the renaissance of atomic physics; 2020

Lembessis, V .E. T aming atoms: the renaissance of atomic physics; 2020

work page 2020

[4] [4]

Evaporative cooling of magnetically trapped and compressed spin-polarized hydrogen

Hess, H.F. Evaporative cooling of magnetically trapped and compressed spin-polarized hydrogen. Physical Review B 1986, 34, 3476

work page 1986

[5] [5]

Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor

Anderson, M.H.; Ensher, J.R.; Matthews, M.R.; Wieman, C.E.; Cornell, E.A. Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor. science 1995, 269, 198–201

work page 1995

[6] [6]

Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms

Davis, K.B.; Mewes, M.O.; Andrews, M.R.; van Druten, N.J.; Durfee, D.S.; Kurn, D.; Ketterle, W. Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms. Physical review letters 1995, 75, 3969

work page 1995

[7] [7]

Strong atom–field coupling for Bose–Einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip

Colombe, Y.; Steinmetz, T.; Dubois, G.; Linke, F.; Hunger, D.; Reichel, J. Strong atom–field coupling for Bose–Einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip. Nature 2007, 450, 272–276

work page 2007

[8] [8]

Atom lasers: Production, properties and prospects for precision inertial measurement

Robins, N.; Altin, P .; Debs, J.; Close, J. Atom lasers: Production, properties and prospects for precision inertial measurement. Physics Reports 2013, 529, 265–296

work page 2013