Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Constraining light dark matter in vector-scalar portals with COSI and AMEGO-X

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-18 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read COSI can set leading constraints on sub-GeV dark matter in vector-scalar portal models beyond CMB limits.

desk verdict COSI could lead on sub-GeV vector-scalar DM in some spots, but the projections rest on a single halo profile whose J-factor uncertainties are not fully tested. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15891 v2 submitted 2025-08-21 hep-ph astro-ph.HEhep-th

Maíra Dutra , Clarissa Siqueira , Tonia M. Venters This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.HEhep-th
keywords darkmattergammaraysCOSIAMEGO-Xvectorportalsub-GeVDMlight
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper explores how the Compton Spectrometer and Imager (COSI) and the All-sky Medium Energy Gamma-ray Observatory eXplorer (AMEGO-X) can detect gamma-ray signals from sub-GeV fermionic dark matter in models where a new gauge boson and the dark matter mass come from a singlet scalar. These models naturally produce particles at the MeV scale, resulting in gamma-ray lines or continuous spectra that match the energy range and resolution of these instruments. The analysis shows that COSI could provide stronger limits than existing cosmic microwave background constraints in some parts of the parameter space for both B-L and axial vector boson cases. AMEGO-X is projected to cover most of the remaining viable space for signals that produce continua rather than sharp lines. This demonstrates a new way to test light dark matter scenarios using future gamma-ray data.

What carries the argument

The vector-scalar portal with a fermionic DM candidate and singlet scalar for mass generation, which yields MeV-scale gamma-ray signatures from DM interactions.

What would settle it

A lack of detected gamma-ray signals or lines in the MeV range by COSI in the predicted parameter regions would indicate that the dark matter constraints are not as strong as estimated or that the model does not produce the expected signals.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the vector-scalar portal model, a fermionic dark matter particle with mass below one GeV is charged under a new U(1) symmetry, and both the dark matter and the new vector boson Z' acquire mass through a singlet scalar field. This setup leads to dark matter annihilation or decay producing gamma-ray lines or continua at MeV energies. Sensitivity estimates indicate that COSI will provide leading constraints in regions of parameter space beyond strong CMB limits, while AMEGO-X can probe most of the viable parameter space for continuum gamma rays.

Load-bearing premise

The model produces gamma-ray lines or continua at MeV energies that are within the detection capabilities and resolution of COSI and AMEGO-X.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines constraints on sub-GeV fermionic dark matter charged under a new U(1) in vector-scalar portal models, where both DM and the Z' acquire mass from a singlet scalar. It computes gamma-ray line and continuum signals from DM annihilation in the MeV band, projects the reach of COSI and AMEGO-X, and identifies regions where COSI sensitivities exceed existing CMB bounds for benchmark B-L and axial-vector cases. The Hazma implementation is made public.

Significance. If the projections are robust, the work demonstrates that upcoming MeV gamma-ray missions can access viable light-DM parameter space beyond CMB limits, with distinctive spectral features providing additional diagnostic power. The open-source Hazma module is a clear strength for reproducibility.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4] §4 (or equivalent signal-calculation section): the projected COSI leading regions are computed with a single galactic DM density profile (standard NFW). Because the J-factor ∫ρ_DM² dl dΩ varies by factors of 5–10 between cored isothermal, contracted, or Einasto profiles, the regions where COSI exceeds CMB limits can shrink or disappear once profile uncertainty is included; a robustness plot or envelope is required to support the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and §5: the statement that COSI provides 'leading constraints beyond the strong CMB limits' should be accompanied by the specific mass-coupling window in which this occurs.
  2. [§2] Notation for the portal couplings and the singlet scalar vev should be defined once in §2 and used consistently thereafter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the robustness of our projected sensitivities.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (or equivalent signal-calculation section): the projected COSI leading regions are computed with a single galactic DM density profile (standard NFW). Because the J-factor ∫ρ_DM² dl dΩ varies by factors of 5–10 between cored isothermal, contracted, or Einasto profiles, the regions where COSI exceeds CMB limits can shrink or disappear once profile uncertainty is included; a robustness plot or envelope is required to support the central claim.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important consideration. The original analysis adopted the standard NFW profile, which is the conventional choice for MeV-scale gamma-ray forecasts in the literature. We agree that J-factor variations across profiles (cored isothermal, Einasto, contracted NFW) can reach factors of 5–10 and may affect the precise boundaries of the regions where COSI exceeds CMB limits. To address this and support the central claim, we will add a robustness subsection and accompanying figure in the revised §4. This will display the COSI sensitivity curves for the alternative profiles and an envelope of the parameter space in which COSI remains leading over CMB constraints across the profile range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: forward projections from instrument specs and standard astrophysics

full rationale

The paper computes projected sensitivities of COSI and AMEGO-X to gamma-ray signals from sub-GeV fermionic DM annihilation in vector-scalar portal models. Fluxes are obtained via the external Hazma toolkit using standard NFW or similar profiles and annihilation spectra; sensitivities are folded with published instrument response functions. No parameter is fitted to existing data and then re-labeled as a prediction, no self-definitional loop equates an output to its input, and load-bearing steps rely on external CMB bounds and instrument characterizations rather than prior author results that presuppose the target claim. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard assumptions of the vector-scalar portal framework and on projected instrument responses; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond those already common in the literature. Because only the abstract is available, the ledger is necessarily incomplete.

free parameters (1)
  • DM mass and portal couplings
    Masses and coupling strengths are scanned to delineate the regions where COSI or AMEGO-X would set leading bounds.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Fermionic sub-GeV DM charged under new U(1) acquires mass from singlet scalar together with the Z prime.
    This is the explicit model class adopted for the sensitivity study.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraining light dark matter in vector-scalar portals with COSI and AMEGO-X." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2508.15891

@misc{pith2026250815891,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraining light dark matter in vector-scalar portals with COSI and AMEGO-X},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2508.15891}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15891}
}
abstract

Detecting gamma-ray signals that could be due to dark matter (DM) particles would give us invaluable information about the nature of DM. In particular, gamma-ray lines could provide a way to measure the DM mass. The excellent energy resolution of the upcoming Compton Spectrometer and Imager (COSI) will allow us to probe underexplored regions of the DM parameter space while being sensitive to distinctive spectral features of potential DM signals. In this work, we consider a fermionic sub-GeV DM charged under a new U(1) gauge symmetry. Both the DM and the new gauge boson $Z'$ acquire mass from a new singlet scalar. The masses of the new particles in this class of vector-scalar portal models are naturally at the MeV scale, enabling detectable gamma-ray lines in the bandpasses of COSI and proposed missions such as the All-sky Medium Energy Gamma-ray Observatory eXplorer (AMEGO-X). We estimate the sensitivities of COSI and AMEGO-X to sub-GeV DM in this context, considering a B-L and a purely axial $Z'$ as benchmark examples. We find regions of the parameter space where COSI will provide leading constraints, beyond the strong CMB limits. On the other hand, AMEGO-X would probe most of the viable parameter space leading to continuum gamma rays. The implementation of our generic vector-scalar portal model in the Hazma toolkit is available at GitHub.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Neutrino lines and photon continua from cascade dark matter decay

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In cascade dark-matter decay, neutrino-line searches can beat gamma-ray limits whenever the intermediate mediator is long-lived enough to suppress the photon flux.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln.Helv

    Zwicky, F. Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln.Helv. Phys. Acta 6, 110– 127 (1933)

    work page 1933

  2. [2]

    The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters

    Harvey, D., Massey, R., Kitching, T., Taylor, A. & Tittley, E. The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters.Science 347, 1462–1465. arXiv: 1503.07675 [astro-ph.CO] (2015)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Ade, P. et al. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13. arXiv: 1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO] (2016)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Aylor, K. et al. A Comparison of Cosmological Parameters Determined from CMB Tem- perature Power Spectra from the South Pole Telescope and the Planck Satellite.Astro- phys. J. 850, 101. arXiv: 1706.10286 [astro-ph.CO] (2017)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  5. [6]

    Aiola, S. et al. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Param- eters. arXiv: 2007.07288 [astro-ph.CO] (July 2020)

    work page arXiv 2007

  6. [7]

    Stecker, F. W. The Cosmic Gamma-Ray Background from the Annihilation of Primordial Stable Neutral Heavy Leptons.Astrophys. J. 223, 1032–1036 (1978)

    work page 1978

  7. [8]

    Goodman, M. W. & Witten, E. Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates.Phys. Rev. D 31 (ed Srednicki, M. A.) 3059 (1985)

    work page 1985

  8. [9]

    Forty years of dark matter searches.Nucl

    Sadoulet, B. Forty years of dark matter searches.Nucl. Phys. B 1003, 116509 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 84 references
  1. [10]

    Aalbers, J. et al. First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experi- ment. Physical review letters 131, 041002 (2023)

    2023

  2. [11]

    Abdalla, H. et al. Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals in the H.E.S.S. Inner Galaxy Survey.Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 111101. arXiv:2207.10471 [astro-ph.HE] (2022)

    2022

  3. [12]

    Ahnen, M. L. et al. Limits to Dark Matter Annihilation Cross-Section from a Combined Analysis of MAGIC and Fermi-LAT Observations of Dwarf Satellite Galaxies.JCAP 02,

  4. [13]

    arXiv: 1601.06590 [astro-ph.HE] (2016). – 26 –

    2016 arXiv

  5. [14]

    & Hooper, D

    Goodenough, L. & Hooper, D. Possible Evidence For Dark Matter Annihilation In The Inner Milky Way From The Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope. arXiv:0910 . 2998 [hep-ph] (Oct. 2009)

    2009

  6. [15]

    & Goodenough, L

    Hooper, D. & Goodenough, L. Dark Matter Annihilation in The Galactic Center As Seen by the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope.Phys. Lett. B 697, 412–428. arXiv: 1010.2752 [hep-ph] (2011)

    2011 arXiv

  7. [16]

    & Linden, T

    Hooper, D. & Linden, T. On The Origin Of The Gamma Rays From The Galactic Center. Phys. Rev. D 84, 123005. arXiv: 1110.0006 [astro-ph.HE] (2011)

    2011 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Grasso, D. et al. On possible interpretations of the high energy electron-positron spec- trum measured by the Fermi Large Area Telescope.Astroparticle Physics 32, 140–151. arXiv: 0905.0636 [astro-ph.HE] (Sept. 2009)

    2009 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Leane, R. K. et al. Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Puzzling Excesses in Dark Matter Searches and How to Resolve Them. arXiv:2203.06859 [hep-ph] (Mar. 2022)

    2022

  10. [19]

    Tomsick, J. A. et al. The Compton Spectrometer and Imager. arXiv: 1908 . 04334 [astro-ph.IM] (Aug. 2019)

    1908

  11. [20]

    Caputo,R. et al. The All-sky Medium Energy Gamma-ray Observatory eXplorer (AMEGO- X) Mission Concept in (Aug. 2022). arXiv:2208.04990 [astro-ph.IM]

    2022

  12. [21]

    Orlando, E. et al. Exploring the MeV sky with a combined coded mask and Compton tele- scope: the Galactic Explorer with a Coded aperture mask Compton telescope (GECCO). JCAP 07, 036. arXiv: 2112.07190 [astro-ph.HE] (2022)

    2022

  13. [22]

    & Sanchez-Conde, M

    Caputo, R., Meyer, M. & Sanchez-Conde, M. AMEGO: Dark Matter Prospects. PoS ICRC2017, 910 (2018)

    2018

  14. [23]

    & Weniger, C

    Bartels, R., Gaggero, D. & Weniger, C. Prospects for indirect dark matter searches with MeV photons.JCAP 05, 001. arXiv: 1703.02546 [astro-ph.HE] (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  15. [24]

    & Profumo, S

    Coogan, A., Moiseev, A., Morrison, L. & Profumo, S. Hunting for Dark Matter and New Physics with (a) GECCO. arXiv:2101.10370 [astro-ph.HE] (Jan. 2021)

    2021

  16. [25]

    & Taoso, M

    Caputo, A., Negro, M., Regis, M. & Taoso, M. Dark matter prospects with COSI: ALPs, PBHs and sub-GeV dark matter.JCAP 02, 006. arXiv: 2210.09310 [hep-ph] (2023)

    2023

  17. [26]

    O’Donnell, K. E. & Slatyer, T. R. Constraints on dark matter with future MeV gamma- ray telescopes. Phys. Rev. D 111, 083037. arXiv: 2411.00087 [hep-ph] (2025)

    2025

  18. [27]

    Watanabe, Y. et al. Light WIMPs and MeV Gamma-ray Detection with COSI. arXiv: 2504.11810 [hep-ph] (Apr. 2025)

    2025

  19. [28]

    & Kar, A

    Cirelli, M. & Kar, A. Prospects of future MeV telescopes in probing weak-scale Dark Matter. arXiv: 2503.04907 [hep-ph] (Mar. 2025)

    2025

  20. [29]

    & Shaikh, H

    Cirelli, M., Kar, A. & Shaikh, H. Indirect searches for realistic sub-GeV Dark Matter models. arXiv: 2508.03819 [hep-ph] (Aug. 2025). – 27 –

    2025

  21. [30]

    & Watanabe, Y

    Fujisawa, S., Hayashi, T., Matsumoto, S. & Watanabe, Y. Detecting Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter at MeV Gamma-Ray Observatories. arXiv:2508.08695 [hep-ph] (Aug. 2025)

    2025

  22. [31]

    & Zupan, J

    Cirelli, M., Strumia, A. & Zupan, J. Dark Matter. arXiv:2406.01705 [hep-ph] (June 2024)

    2024 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Arcadi, G. et al. The Waning of the WIMP: Endgame?Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 152. arXiv: 2403.15860 [hep-ph] (2025)

    2025

  24. [33]

    Cvetic,M.&Langacker,P.Z’PhysicsandSupersymmetry. Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 18, 312–331. arXiv:hep-ph/9707451 (1998)

    1998 arXiv

  25. [34]

    & Rosner, J

    London, D. & Rosner, J. L. Extra Gauge Bosons in E(6).Phys. Rev. D 34, 1530 (1986)

    1986

  26. [35]

    Hewett, J. L. & Rizzo, T. G. Low-Energy Phenomenology of Superstring Inspired E(6) Models. Phys. Rept. 183, 193 (1989)

    1989

  27. [36]

    Chun, E. J. & Park, J.-C. Dark matter and sub-GeV hidden U(1) in GMSB models. JCAP 02, 026. arXiv: 0812.0308 [hep-ph] (2009)

    2009 arXiv

  28. [37]

    The Physics of HeavyZ′ Gauge Bosons

    Langacker, P. The Physics of HeavyZ′ Gauge Bosons. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1199–1228. arXiv: 0801.1345 [hep-ph] (2009)

    2009 arXiv

  29. [38]

    & Smirnov, J

    Duerr, M., Fileviez Perez, P. & Smirnov, J. Simplified Dirac Dark Matter Models and Gamma-Ray Lines. Phys. Rev. D 92, 083521. arXiv: 1506.05107 [hep-ph] (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  30. [39]

    & Vogl, S

    Kahlhoefer, F., Schmidt-Hoberg, K., Schwetz, T. & Vogl, S. Implications of unitarity and gauge invariance for simplified dark matter models.JHEP 02, 016. arXiv: 1510.02110 [hep-ph] (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Carena, M., Daleo, A., Dobrescu, B. A. & Tait, T. M. P.Z′ gauge bosons at the Tevatron. Phys. Rev. D 70, 093009. arXiv: hep-ph/0408098 (2004)

    2004 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Escudero, M., Witte, S. J. & Rius, N. The dispirited case of gauged U(1)B−L dark matter. JHEP 08, 190. arXiv: 1806.02823 [hep-ph] (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Z′ Mediated Dark Matter Models for the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Ex- cess

    Hooper, D. Z′ Mediated Dark Matter Models for the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Ex- cess. Phys. Rev. D 91, 035025. arXiv: 1411.4079 [hep-ph] (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  34. [43]

    D., Degrande, C., Duhr, C

    Alloul, A., Christensen, N. D., Degrande, C., Duhr, C. & Fuks, B. FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250–

  35. [44]

    arXiv: 1310.1921 [hep-ph] (2014)

    1921 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Hue, L. T. et al. General one-loop formulas for decayh → Zγ. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 885. arXiv: 1712.05234 [hep-ph] (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  37. [46]

    & Zaldivar, B

    Dudas, E., Heurtier, L., Mambrini, Y. & Zaldivar, B. Extra U(1), effective operators, anomalies and dark matter.JHEP 11, 083. arXiv: 1307.0005 [hep-ph] (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Arnellos, L., Marciano, W. J. & Parsa, Z. Radiative decays:W ± → P ± + γ and Z → P 0+γ. Nuclear Physics B 196,378–393.issn:0550-3213. https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/0550321382904965 (1982). – 28 –

    1982

  39. [48]

    & Yamawaki, K

    Fujiwara, T., Kugo, T., Terao, H., Uehara, S. & Yamawaki, K. Non-Abelian Anomaly and Vector Mesons as Dynamical Gauge Bosons of Hidden Local Symmetries.Progress of Theoretical Physics 73, 926–941.issn: 0033-068X. eprint: https://academic.oup. com/ptp/article- pdf/73/4/926/5298...

    1985

  40. [49]

    & Song, H

    Ko, P., Lee, J. & Song, H. S. Chiral perturbation theory versus vector meson dominance in the decays phi –> rho gamma gamma and phi –> omega gamma gamma.Phys. Lett. B 366, 287–292. arXiv:hep-ph/9510205 (1996)

    1996 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Tulin,S.Newweakly-coupledforceshiddeninlow-energyQCD. Phys. Rev. D 89,114008. arXiv: 1404.4370 [hep-ph] (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  42. [51]

    & Profumo, S

    Coogan, A., Morrison, L. & Profumo, S. Hazma: A Python Toolkit for Studying Indirect Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter.JCAP 01, 056. arXiv:1907.11846 [hep-ph] (2020)

    1907

  43. [52]

    & Valluri, M

    De Salas, P., Malhan, K., Freese, K., Hattori, K. & Valluri, M. On the estimation of the local dark matter density using the rotation curve of the Milky Way.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019, 037–037.issn: 1475-7516. http://dx.doi. org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/...

    2019 doi

  44. [53]

    Ambrogi, F. et al. MadDM v.3.0: a Comprehensive Tool for Dark Matter Studies.Phys. Dark Univ. 24, 100249. arXiv: 1804.00044 [hep-ph] (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Elor, G., Rodd, N. L. & Slatyer, T. R. Multistep cascade annihilations of dark matter and the Galactic Center excess.Phys. Rev. D 91, 103531. arXiv: 1503.01773 [hep-ph] (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  46. [55]

    & Reimitz, P

    Coogan, A., Morrison, L., Plehn, T., Profumo, S. & Reimitz, P. Hazma Meets HER- WIG4DM:PrecisionGamma-Ray,Neutrino,andPositronSpectraforLightDarkMatter. arXiv: 2207.07634 [hep-ph] (July 2022)

    2022

  47. [56]

    Beechert, J. et al. Calibrations of the Compton Spectrometer and Imager.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1031, 166510. arXiv: 2203.00695 [astro-ph.IM] (2022)

    2022

  48. [57]

    & Orellana, F

    Shtabovenko, V., Mertig, R. & Orellana, F. FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?Comput. Phys. Commun. 306, 109357. arXiv:2312.14089 [hep-ph] (2025)

    2025

  49. [58]

    D., Volansky, T

    Essig, R., Kuflik, E., McDermott, S. D., Volansky, T. & Zurek, K. M. Constraining Light Dark Matter with Diffuse X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Observations.JHEP 11, 193. arXiv: 1309.4091 [hep-ph] (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Cirelli, M., Fornengo, N., Kavanagh, B. J. & Pinetti, E. Integral X-ray constraints on sub-GeV Dark Matter.Phys. Rev. D 103, 063022. arXiv: 2007.11493 [hep-ph] (2021)

    2007

  51. [60]

    Astrophys

    Strong,A.W.,Bloemen,H.,Diehl,R.,Hermsen,W.&Schoenfelder,V.Comptelskymap- ping: A New approach using parallel computing. Astrophys. Lett. Commun. 39, 209. arXiv: astro-ph/9811211 (1999). – 29 –

    1999 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Schoenfelder, V. et al. Instrument Description and Performance of the Imaging Gamma- Ray Telescope COMPTEL aboard the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory.Astrophys. J. Suppl. S 86, 657 (June 1993)

    1993

  53. [62]

    Bouchet, L. et al. Diffuse Emission Measurement with the SPectrometer on INTEGRAL as an Indirect Probe of Cosmic-Ray Electrons and Positrons.The Astrophysical Journal 739, 29. issn: 1538-4357. arXiv:1107.0200 [astro-ph]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/739/1/29 (Sept. 2011)

    2011 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Karwin, C. M. et al. Probing the Galactic Diffuse Continuum Emission with COSI. Astrophys. J. 959, 90. arXiv: 2310.12206 [astro-ph.HE] (2023)

    2023

  55. [64]

    Tomsick, J. A. et al. The Compton Spectrometer and Imager. PoS ICRC2023, 745. arXiv: 2308.12362 [astro-ph.HE] (2023)

    2023

  56. [65]

    Negro,M.,Fleischhack,H.,Zoglauer,A.,Digel,S.&Ajello,M.UnveilingtheOriginofthe Fermi Bubbles with MeV Photon Telescopes.Astrophys. J. 927, 225. arXiv:2111.10362 [astro-ph.HE] (2022)

    2022

  57. [66]

    Siegert, T., Berteaud, J., Calore, F., Serpico, P. D. & Weinberger, C. Diffuse Galactic emission spectrum between 0.5 and 8.0 MeV.Astron. Astrophys. 660,A130. arXiv:2202. 04574 [astro-ph.HE] (2022)

    2022

  58. [67]

    Aghanim, N. et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys. 641.[Erratum:Astron.Astrophys.652,C4(2021)],A6.arXiv: 1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] (2020)

    2018 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Slatyer, T. R. Energy Injection And Absorption In The Cosmic Dark Ages.Phys. Rev. D 87, 123513. arXiv: 1211.0283 [astro-ph.CO] (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Slatyer, T. R. Indirect dark matter signatures in the cosmic dark ages. I. Generalizing the bound on s-wave dark matter annihilation from Planck results.Phys. Rev. D 93, 023527. arXiv: 1506.03811 [hep-ph] (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  61. [70]

    Slatyer, T. R. Indirect Dark Matter Signatures in the Cosmic Dark Ages II. Ionization, Heating and Photon Production from Arbitrary Energy Injections.Phys. Rev. D 93, 023521. arXiv: 1506.03812 [astro-ph.CO] (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Alguero, G. et al. micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter.Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 299, 109133. arXiv: 2312.14894 [hep-ph] (2024)

    2024

  63. [72]

    Aprile, E. et al. Light Dark Matter Search with Ionization Signals in XENON1T.Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801. arXiv: 1907.11485 [hep-ex] (2019)

    1907

  64. [73]

    Agnes, P. et al. Search for Dark Matter Particle Interactions with Electron Final States with DarkSide-50. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101002. arXiv: 2207.11968 [hep-ex] (2023)

    2023

  65. [74]

    Adari, P. et al. First Direct-Detection Results on Sub-GeV Dark Matter Using the SEN- SEIDetectoratSNOLAB. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134,011804.arXiv: 2312.13342 [astro-ph.CO] (2025). – 30 –

    2025

  66. [75]

    & Volansky, T

    Essig, R., Mardon, J. & Volansky, T. Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter.Phys. Rev. D 85, 076007. arXiv: 1108.5383 [hep-ph] (2012)

    2012 arXiv

  67. [76]

    Essig, R. et al. Direct Detection of sub-GeV Dark Matter with Semiconductor Targets. JHEP 05, 046. arXiv: 1509.01598 [hep-ph] (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  68. [77]

    & Suzuki, K

    Ibe, M., Nakano, W., Shoji, Y. & Suzuki, K. Migdal Effect in Dark Matter Direct De- tection Experiments. JHEP 03, 194. arXiv: 1707.07258 [hep-ph] (2018)

    2018

  69. [78]

    J., Kahlhoefer, F

    Dolan, M. J., Kahlhoefer, F. & McCabe, C. Directly detecting sub-GeV dark matter with electrons from nuclear scattering.Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 101801. arXiv:1711.09906 [hep-ph] (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Some progress & challenges for the direct-detection of sub-GeV dark matter

    Essig, R. Some progress & challenges for the direct-detection of sub-GeV dark matter. Nucl. Phys. B 1003, 116484 (2024)

    2024

  71. [80]

    Battaglieri, M. et al. US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report in U.S. Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter (July 2017). arXiv: 1707. 04591 [hep-ph]

    2017

  72. [81]

    & Lin, T

    Knapen, S., Kozaczuk, J. & Lin, T. Dark matter-electron scattering in dielectrics.Phys. Rev. D 104, 015031. arXiv: 2101.08275 [hep-ph] (2021)

    2021

  73. [82]

    & Gray, T

    Cosme, C., Dutra, M., Godfrey, S. & Gray, T. R. Testing freeze-in with axial and vector Z’ bosons.JHEP 09, 056. arXiv: 2104.13937 [hep-ph] (2021)

    2021

  74. [83]

    & Yang, L

    Cosme, C., Dutra, M., Ma, T., Wu, Y. & Yang, L. Neutrino portal to FIMP dark matter with an early matter era.JHEP 03, 026. arXiv: 2003.01723 [hep-ph] (2021)

    2003

  75. [84]

    Dutra, M. et al. MeV Dark Matter Complementarity and the Dark Photon Portal.JCAP 03, 037. arXiv: 1801.05447 [hep-ph] (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Dutra, M. & Wu, Y. EvoEMD: cosmic evolution with an early matter-dominated era. Phys. Dark Univ. 40, 101198. arXiv: 2111.15665 [hep-ph] (2023). – 31 –

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed May 18, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.