Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

The Cosmic Rush Hour: Rapid Formation of Bright, Massive, Disky, Star-Forming Galaxies as Signatures of Early-Universe Physics

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Early dark energy, tuned only by CMB data, reproduces JWST's surplus of bright, massive, disky galaxies at cosmic dawn, then fades back to standard cosmology by z≈3.

desk verdict First hydro sims of EDE show a robust EDE-vs-LCDM offset in high-z galaxies, but the absolute match to JWST is degenerate with star-formation efficiency and dust choices. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.19427 v1 pith:AWWVXAOQ submitted 2025-09-23 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COhep-ph

Xuejian Shen , Oliver Zier , Mark Vogelsberger , Michael Boylan-Kolchin , Lars Hernquist , Sandro Tacchella , Rohan P. Naidu This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords earlydarkenergyhigh-redshiftgalaxiesJWSTUVluminosityfunctionstellarmassdiskcosmologicalhydrodynamicsimulationsHubbletension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a pre-recombination burst of early dark energy—an ingredient originally proposed to resolve the Hubble tension—also explains the surprisingly abundant, massive, star-forming disk galaxies JWST sees at z≈4–14. It does this with two large cosmological hydrodynamic simulations, one in standard ΛCDM and one with EDE parameters fixed by CMB fits; the galaxy formation model is the same out-of-the-box, low-redshift-calibrated model in both runs. In the EDE run, UV luminosity functions and stellar mass functions agree with JWST measurements with essentially no recalibration, and the number density of disky galaxies rises by about half a dex at z≈6–7. Predictions converge to ΛCDM at z≲3, preserving known low-redshift successes. The paper concludes that early-universe physics can simultaneously address several JWST anomalies and the Hubble tension.

What carries the argument

The central object is early dark energy as a scalar field with an axion-like potential V(φ)≈[1−cos(φ/f)]³, with parameters taken from CMB fits that also yield H0≈74.8 km/s/Mpc. The field acts as a cosmological constant before recombination and then dilutes; its observable imprint is an enhanced small-scale linear power spectrum (higher n_s and A_s) that accelerates the collapse of the first halos. The simulations couple this cosmology to the IllustrisTNG galaxy formation model in the Arepo code, with identical subgrid physics in EDE and ΛCDM runs, so any galaxy differences come purely from the altered expansion history and power spectrum.

What would settle it

Measure the UV luminosity function at z≈12–14 with a larger, purely spectroscopic sample: if the bright-end number density turns out to be roughly 0.5 dex lower than current JWST photometric estimates, the EDE match disappears. Conversely, a robust measurement of the clustering bias of bright galaxies at z≈6–8—EDE predicts lower bias than ΛCDM at fixed luminosity—would discriminate the two.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that EDE's accelerated early structure formation, driven mainly by an enhanced small-scale matter power spectrum with higher spectral index, primordial amplitude, and matter density, boosts the abundance of bright and massive galaxies enough to remove the 0.5–1 dex shortfall that standard ΛCDM simulations show against JWST at z≳10. Because EDE decays after recombination, the same run converges back to ΛCDM predictions at z≲3 with ≲0.2 dex differences. The faster assembly of massive halos also makes stellar and gaseous disks appear earlier: number densities of disky galaxies are about half a dex larger at z≈6–7, while the disky fraction at fixed stellar mass is unchanged,

Load-bearing premise

The galaxy formation model, calibrated at low redshift, is assumed to stay accurate at z=4–14 with no recalibration; if real high-redshift star formation or feedback differs systematically, the EDE simulation's agreement with JWST could be coincidence rather than evidence for EDE.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • JWST's excess of UV-bright galaxies at z≈10–14 does not require exotic star-formation physics; a CMB-consistent EDE cosmology with standard galaxy formation reproduces the observed counts.
  • Massive galaxy candidates in the COSMOS-Web field at z≈11–12, which appear as >3σ outliers in ΛCDM, fall within about 2–3σ of EDE predictions.
  • Stellar and gaseous disks form earlier in EDE, so ALMA and JWST disk detections at z≈6–8 become expected rather than surprising, with gaseous disk number densities roughly a factor of three higher at z≈6–7.
  • At z≲3 the EDE run converges to ΛCDM within ≲0.2 dex, preserving the established low-redshift successes of the standard model.
  • The model predicts fewer massive quenched galaxies than ΛCDM at z≳3.5, supporting the paper's view that the early-quenching puzzle is likely a baryonic or black-hole-physics limitation, not a cosmological one.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Any beyond-ΛCDM model that increases the pre-recombination expansion rate generically tilts the small-scale power spectrum upward, so high-redshift galaxy abundance could serve as a broad probe of early-universe physics beyond EDE itself.
  • The paper's reduced-bias prediction—bright galaxies less clustered in EDE at fixed luminosity—offers a direct observational test: galaxy clustering at z≈6–10 from JWST fields could distinguish EDE from baryonic solutions like feedback-free starbursts or top-heavy initial mass functions.
  • If high-z star formation or feedback is later shown to be systematically different, the EDE match could be coincidental; the paper's own shortfall in quenched galaxies already signals that the subgrid black-hole model limits the comparison.
  • Lyman-α forest and 21-cm observations, usually used to rule out suppressed small-scale power, could be turned around to constrain enhanced small-scale power of the kind EDE produces.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents the first large-scale cosmological hydrodynamic simulations of an Early Dark Energy (EDE) cosmology using the IllustrisTNG galaxy formation model, alongside a matched ΛCDM simulation. EDE parameters are taken from a CMB fit (Smith et al. 2022) and are not adjusted to galaxy data. The central claim is that EDE, through an enhanced small-scale matter power spectrum, boosts the abundance of UV-bright and massive galaxies at z ≃ 4–14, bringing simulated UV luminosity functions and stellar mass functions into 'excellent agreement' with JWST measurements, while predictions converge to ΛCDM by z ≲ 3. The paper also reports earlier emergence of disky galaxies in EDE and a surprising delay in quenched galaxies due to the younger universe. The comparison is supported by an empirical model and by an appendix isolating the power-spectrum change from the H0 change.

Significance. If the headline claim holds, this is an important result: it demonstrates that modifications to pre-recombination cosmology can simultaneously ease several JWST 'too early, too massive, too disk-like' tensions without retuning the IllustrisTNG baryonic model. The controlled EDE-versus-ΛCDM comparison with identical subgrid physics is a genuine strength, as is the authors' use of an independent empirical model and the clear decomposition of the effect into power-spectrum versus H0 changes. The paper is also commendably transparent about the quenched-galaxy underprediction. However, the absolute 'excellent agreement with JWST' is less secure than the differential EDE-ΛCDM signal: it depends on post-processing choices (zero dust attenuation at z ≥ 10, empirically calibrated dust at z < 10) and on the IllustrisTNG star-formation efficiency at high redshift, which Fig. 4 shows is at the lower envelope of current models. These degeneracies do not invalidate the differential statement, but they weaken the inference that EDE is required by the JWST abundance data.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Fig. 5; §2.3–2.4] The claimed 'excellent agreement' at z ≥ 10 relies on setting dust attenuation to zero at z ≥ 10 while using empirically calibrated dust at lower redshifts. This is an upper-limit choice in brightness: simulated galaxies do contain dust, and the motivation 'observed blue UV slopes' is partly circular when the goal is to match observed UV luminosity functions. The EDE-ΛCDM differential remains robust, but the absolute normalization of the z = 12–14 UV LFs, which is a headline result, is not. Please show the intrinsic A_UV distribution of the simulated galaxies at z ≥ 10, or test the sensitivity of Fig. 5 to a small nonzero attenuation (e.g., A_UV = 0.2–0.5 mag).
  2. [§2.2, Fig. 4; §3.1] The inference that EDE is needed to match JWST is degenerate with the high-redshift star-formation efficiency. The IllustrisTNG SFE in Fig. 4 is nearly redshift-independent and lies at the lower envelope of published models; FIREbox, thesan-zoom, and the FFB scenario show SFEs 0.5–1 dex higher at M_halo ~ 10^10–10^11 M_sun. Because the EDE boost to the halo mass function is roughly 0.2–0.8 dex over the relevant range, a modest upward revision of TNG's high-z SFE in ΛCDM could produce the same UV LF and SMF as EDE+TNG. The 'essentially no additional calibration' claim is therefore relative to TNG, not to the space of plausible baryonic models. Please quantify this degeneracy—e.g., show what a ΛCDM run with a 0.3–0.5 dex higher SFE would predict—or identify an observable that breaks it (clustering, stellar mass functions at fixed UV luminosity, or [C II] kinematics).
  3. [§3.1, Fig. 5; Table 2] The conclusions at z = 9–14 are based on a single (100 cMpc)^3 simulation volume per cosmology. In Fig. 5 the shaded 'one galaxy per mag' region indicates that the bright-end bins at z = 12 and 14 contain very few galaxies, and the Poisson errors do not include cosmic variance. The empirical model and Eq. (4) provide a useful volume correction, but the claimed 'almost perfect' agreement at z ≳ 12 could be affected substantially by sample variance. Please quantify cosmic variance—for example, by using the empirical model to estimate the expected field-to-field scatter in the z = 12–14 UV LF bins, or by running a second realization of at least one cosmology.
  4. [Abstract; §3.4, Fig. 10] The abstract's phrase 'simultaneously reconcile multiple high-redshift challenges' is too broad in light of the paper's own finding that quenched galaxies at M* ≳ 10^10 M_sun are underpredicted by an order of magnitude at z ≳ 3 in both cosmologies, and that EDE delays rather than accelerates quenching. The authors are appropriately candid in §3.4 and §4, but the abstract and conclusions should explicitly state that EDE does not address the early-quenching tension and may worsen it. This does not undermine the UV LF and SMF results, but it does limit the 'multiple challenges' claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.4] The empirical-model parameter σ_UV = 0.75 mag is described as 'assumed' and 'purely for interpretation.' Since this scatter directly affects the LF shape and the stellar-mass-function derivation in Eq. (1), please state its source and the sensitivity of the empirical-model curves to it.
  2. [§2.1, Table 1] The adopted EDE parameters from Smith et al. (2022) are now less favored by Planck PR4+BAO and are more aggressive than the ACT DR6/DESI-based fits cited in §2.1. The paper discusses this, but the abstract and conclusions should more clearly present the simulations as a proof-of-principle for a broader class of early-universe models, not as evidence for the specific best-fit model.
  3. [§3.3] The disk thresholds (D/T)_* = 0.7 and (D/T)_gas = 0.8 are reasonable but somewhat arbitrary. A brief sensitivity test (e.g., varying the thresholds by ±0.1) would help confirm that the half-dex EDE-ΛCDM difference in disky-galaxy number density is not driven by the exact cut.
  4. [§3.2, Fig. 7] The Schechter-function fits at z ≥ 5 fix the break mass to 10^11 M_sun. This is justified, but the choice could affect the integrated stellar-mass-density comparison; a short statement of the resulting systematic uncertainty would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Central EDE-vs-ΛCDM comparison is externally anchored by CMB fits and a fixed low-z-calibrated galaxy formation model; no circular reduction found.

full rationale

The paper's headline inference—that EDE improves agreement with JWST galaxy abundance measurements—rests on two external anchors, not on the target data. The EDE parameters are taken from Smith et al. (2022), a CMB fit independent of the JWST abundance data, and the IllustrisTNG galaxy formation model is an out-of-the-box model calibrated at low redshift (§2.2). Both the ΛCDM and EDE runs use identical subgrid physics, so the EDE-vs-ΛCDM differential comparison is not a fitted prediction: the baryonic model is common to both and the SFE is explicitly shown to be indistinguishable between runs (Fig. 4). The paper does not fit the UV luminosity function or stellar mass function to JWST data and then re-predict them. The only potentially load-bearing modeling choice for the high-redshift absolute comparison is the assumption of no dust attenuation at z≥10, justified by observed blue UV slopes of the same high-z galaxies (§2.3). This is an input assumption motivated by an independent observable (UV spectral slope), not a parameter fitted to the luminosity-function amplitude; it does not reduce the predicted LF to an observed LF by construction. The empirical model from the authors' prior work (Shen et al. 2023, 2024b) is used mainly for interpretation and volume corrections, not as the evidence for EDE. The paper also explicitly acknowledges the quenched-galaxy underprediction as a limitation of the SMBH subgrid model (§3.4), and it discusses degeneracies with baryonic alternatives (§4). Self-citations appear frequently but are not load-bearing for the central claim: the EDE model and its parameters are externally cited, and the IllustrisTNG model is externally defined. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. Accordingly, there is no significant circularity; the score reflects only the minor use of author's prior empirical model as a comparison tool, which is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; the EDE scalar field is a pre-existing cosmological model. The free parameters listed are choices in post-processing or empirical comparison, not fits to the JWST data being explained. The main unfalsifiable-to-this-study input is the trust placed in the IllustrisTNG subgrid model at high redshift.

free parameters (4)
  • UV variability scatter sigma_UV = 0.75 mag
    Set to mimic the low burstiness of IllustrisTNG in the empirical model used for volume corrections; affects the width, not the central value, of the UV luminosity function.
  • Dust attenuation constants C0, C1 = C0 ~ 4.9, C1 ~ 2
    Adopted from Bowler et al. (2024) for the Meurer A_UV-beta relation and applied to simulation predictions at z<10, affecting the absolute normalization of the UV LFs.
  • Disk selection thresholds = (D/T)_star > 0.7, (D/T)_gas > 0.8
    Chosen by hand to match kinematic studies of low-redshift Milky Way-mass galaxies and ALMA samples; directly sets the disky galaxy number densities.
  • sSFR quenched cut = sSFR < 0.2 / t_H(z)
    Widely used literature cut to separate star-forming and quenched galaxies; affects the quenched fractions reported in Section 3.4.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption EDE cosmology with Smith et al. (2022) best-fit parameters (f_EDE ~ 0.179, log10 z_c ~ -3.528, theta_i ~ -2.806, m ~ 4.38e-28 eV, etc.)
    The model is fixed by CMB data, but Section 2.1 acknowledges that more recent ACT DR6/Planck/DESI analyses favor a weaker EDE; the qualitative conclusions are argued to survive.
  • domain assumption The IllustrisTNG subgrid physics, calibrated at low redshift, is valid at z=4-14 without recalibration
    Section 2.2 and Section 4: the out-of-the-box TNG model is used; the paper itself notes it underpredicts quenched galaxies by an order of magnitude, indicating model limitations.
  • standard math The linear matter power spectrum from CAMB's early-quintessence implementation, with adiabatic and Gaussian primordial perturbations, is correct
    Initial conditions and transfer functions in Section 2.1 rely on this; the authors verify Axiclass gives identical results.
  • domain assumption Empirical dust attenuation relations (Meurer et al. 1999; Bouwens et al. 2014; Cullen et al. 2023) apply to simulated galaxies at z<10
    Section 2.4: these observed relations are applied to the simulations, and the no-dust assumption at z>=10 is motivated by blue UV slopes of the observed population.
  • standard math Halo mass function and halo accretion-rate fitting formulae (Press-Schechter/Sheth-Tormen, Rodriguez-Puebla et al. 2016) are accurate for EDE cosmologies
    Used in the empirical model for volume corrections and comparison; Appendix A verifies the mass function matches the simulation subhalo masses at z=12.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Cosmic Rush Hour: Rapid Formation of Bright, Massive, Disky, Star-Forming Galaxies as Signatures of Early-Universe Physics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AWWVXAOQ

@misc{pith2026250919427,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Cosmic Rush Hour: Rapid Formation of Bright, Massive, Disky, Star-Forming Galaxies as Signatures of Early-Universe Physics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AWWVXAOQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.19427}
}
abstract

Early JWST observations have revealed a high-redshift universe more vibrant than predicted by canonical galaxy-formation models within $\Lambda$CDM, showing an excess of ultraviolet(UV)-bright, massive, and morphologically mature galaxies. Departures from $\Lambda$CDM prior to recombination can imprint signatures on non-linear structure formation at high redshift. In this paper, we investigate one such scenario - Early Dark Energy, originally proposed to resolve the Hubble tension - and its implications for these high-redshift challenges. We present the first large-scale cosmological hydrodynamic simulations of these models. Modifications to the pre-recombination expansion history accelerate early structure formation and produce UV luminosity and stellar mass functions in excellent agreement with JWST measurements, requiring essentially no additional calibrations. Predictions converge to $\Lambda$CDM at lower redshifts ($z \lesssim 3$), thereby preserving all successes of $\Lambda$CDM. This model also accelerates the emergence of stellar and gaseous disks, increasing their number densities by $\sim 0.5$ dex at $z\simeq 6$-7, primarily due to the higher abundance of massive galaxies. Taken together, these results demonstrate how early-universe physics can simultaneously reconcile multiple high-redshift challenges and the Hubble tension while retaining the core achievements of $\Lambda$CDM. This opens a pathway to constraining a broad class of beyond-$\Lambda$CDM models with forthcoming observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.19427 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Ratios between the dimensionless linear matter power spectrum (Δ 2 ) of the EDE and ΛCDM models. The vertical dotted line indicates the fundamental mode of the box size (𝑘fd ≡ 2𝜋/𝐿box) in ΛCDM. The vertical dashed line shows roughly the Nyquist limit of our simulation, 𝑘Nq ≡ (2𝜋/𝐿box ) (𝑁 1/3 dm /2), where 𝑁 1/3 dm is the number of dark matter par￾ticles per dimension. The top axis shows the halo mass at 𝑧 = 0 that … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dark matter surface density in a 25 cMpc field of view (1/4 of the simulation box length) centered on the most massive halo at 𝑧 ≃ 9. The thickness of the layer for projection is also 25 cMpc. The left and right panels show the dark matter maps in the ΛCDM and EDE runs. Dark matter clustering appears stronger in the EDE model. We overlay the location of moderately bright (intrinsic 𝑀UV ≤ −18 mag) and very bright gal… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Star-formation efficiency (SFE) versus halo mass. We show our ΛCDM simulation results as open circles with 1𝜎 error bars at 𝑧 ≃ 5, 7, and 9. The EDE run yields identical results. We compare them to the SFE assumed in our empirical model (Shen et al. 2023, 2024b) and ot…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Galaxy rest-frame UV luminosity function at 𝑧 ≃ 4 − 14 in the ΛCDM and EDE simulations. Binned estimations from the simulations are shown with solid circles, and Poisson errors are computed using the formula in Gehrels (1986). Dust attenuation has been applied at 𝑧 < 1…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Galaxy stellar mass function at 𝑧 = 3, 5, 7, and 9 in the ΛCDM and EDE runs. They are shown in solid circles, and Poisson errors are computed using the formula from Gehrels (1986). We compare them to the pre-JWST observational constraints from Santini et al. (2012); Il…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Cosmic stellar mass density versus redshift. We integrate the Schechter function fitted at each redshift with 𝑀min = 108 M⊙ and 𝑀max = 1013 M⊙ to obtain the cosmic stellar mass density. The top two axes show the age of the universe in the two cosmologies. Observational…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Maximum stellar mass of galaxies within a volume probed by the COSMOS-Web survey (≃ 0.28 deg2 used in Casey et al. 2024). The solid lines in the top and bottom panels show the estimates based on our ΛCDM and EDE simulations, respectively. The shaded regions display 1, …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top: Number density of disky galaxies in the universe versus redshift in the ΛCDM and EDE runs. We show the number densities of massive galaxies (𝑀∗ ≥ 109.5 M⊙) with stellar disks in solid lines, and those of galaxies (𝑀∗ ≥ 109 M⊙) with gaseous disks in dashed lines. D…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Number density of massive quenched galaxies versus redshift in the ΛCDM and EDE simulations. We show the number density of massive galaxies (𝑀∗ ≥ 1010 M⊙) in dashed lines, massive and quenched galax￾ies in solid lines, and massive SMBHs (𝑀BH ≥ 108 M⊙) in dotted lines.…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Resolving galaxy formation in the early Universe with BonFIRE and CampFIRE

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    BonFIRE and CampFIRE simulations show bursty clustered star formation in early galaxies and predict UV luminosity functions matching observations at faint magnitudes with a turnover at M_UV approx -14 but overpredicti...

  2. Dark Secrets of Baryons: Illuminating Dark Matter-Baryon Interactions with JWST

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    JWST ultraviolet luminosity function data currently provide the strongest upper limits on velocity-dependent (∝v^{-2}) dark matter–proton scattering for sub-GeV dark matter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

262 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Abdalla E., et al., 2022, @doi [Journal of High Energy Astrophysics] 10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022JHEAp..34...49A 34, 49

    doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 2022

  2. [2]

    arXiv:2203.08128

    Ach \'u carro A., et al., 2022, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2203.08128 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220308128A p. arXiv:2203.08128

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.08128 2022

  3. [3]

    J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.4755A 518, 4755

    Adams N. J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.4755A 518, 4755

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3347 2023

  4. [4]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965..169A 965, 169

    Adams N. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965..169A 965, 169

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b 2024

  5. [5]

    B., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acef21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...956...61A 956, 61

    Akins H. B., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acef21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...956...61A 956, 61

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acef21 2023

  6. [6]

    B., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2406.10341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240610341A p

    Akins H. B., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2406.10341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240610341A p. arXiv:2406.10341

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.10341 2024

  7. [7]

    Alberts S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975...85A 975, 85

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cc 2024

  8. [8]

    Aloni D., Berlin A., Joseph M., Schmaltz M., Weiner N., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123516 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhRvD.105l3516A 105, 123516

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.123516 2022

Show all 262 references
  1. [9]

    Arvanitaki A., Dimopoulos S., Dubovsky S., Kaloper N., March-Russell J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123530 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PhRvD..81l3530A 81, 123530

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    Atek H., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3144 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.1201A 519, 1201

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Barnes J., Hut P., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1038/324446a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986Natur.324..446B 324, 446

    1986 doi

  4. [12]

    Bashinsky S., Seljak U., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.083002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PhRvD..69h3002B 69, 083002

    2004 doi

  5. [13]

    S., Wechsler R

    Behroozi P. S., Wechsler R. H., Conroy C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770...57B 770, 57

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    H., Hearin A

    Behroozi P., Wechsler R. H., Hearin A. P., Conroy C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1182 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.3143B 488, 3143

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    F., McIntosh D

    Bell E. F., McIntosh D. H., Katz N., Weinberg M. D., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378847 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJS..149..289B 149, 289

    2003 doi

  8. [16]

    Belokurov V., Kravtsov A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1267 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514..689B 514, 689

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    Bland-Hawthorn J., Tepper-Garcia T., Agertz O., Freeman K., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acc469 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...947...80B 947, 80

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    R., Cole S., Efstathiou G., Kaiser N., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170520 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...379..440B 379, 440

    Bond J. R., Cole S., Efstathiou G., Kaiser N., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170520 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...379..440B 379, 440

    1991 doi

  11. [19]

    J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...793..115B 793, 115

    Bouwens R. J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...793..115B 793, 115

    2014 doi

  12. [20]

    J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162...47B 162, 47

    Bouwens R. J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162...47B 162, 47

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a4a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931..160B 931, 160

    Bouwens R. J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a4a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931..160B 931, 160

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    Bouwens R., Illingworth G., Oesch P., Stefanon M., Naidu R., van Leeuwen I., Magee D., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.1009B 523, 1009

    doi

  15. [23]

    J., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.1036B 523, 1036

    Bouwens R. J., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.1036B 523, 1036

    doi

  16. [24]

    Bowler R. A. A., Jarvis M. J., Dunlop J. S., McLure R. J., McLeod D. J., Adams N. J., Milvang-Jensen B., McCracken H. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa313 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.2059B 493, 2059

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    Bowler R. A. A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3578 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.5808B 527, 5808

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Boylan-Kolchin M., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..731B 7, 731

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Boylan-Kolchin M., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf471 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.538.3210B 538, 3210

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.2764B 505, 2764

    Boylan-Kolchin M., Weisz D. R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.2764B 505, 2764

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    Brout D., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...938..110B 938, 110

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    L., Norman M

    Bryan G. L., Norman M. L., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305262 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...495...80B 495, 80

    1998 doi

  23. [31]

    S., Boylan-Kolchin M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..343B 55, 343

    Bullock J. S., Boylan-Kolchin M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..343B 55, 343

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    Calabr \`o A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7602 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..245C 975, 245

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    C., McLure R

    Carnall A. C., McLure R. J., Dunlop J. S., Dav \'e R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.4379C 480, 4379

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    C., et al., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad369 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.3974C 520, 3974

    Carnall A. C., et al., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad369 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.3974C 520, 3974

    doi

  27. [35]

    C., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.619..716C 619, 716

    Carnall A. C., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.619..716C 619, 716

    doi

  28. [36]

    Carniani S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.633..318C 633, 318

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2075 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965...98C 965, 98

    Casey C. M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2075 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965...98C 965, 98

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Castellano M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...938L..15C 938, L15

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    Chabrier G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376392 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..763C 115, 763

    2003 doi

  32. [40]

    Chandra V., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b60 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...972..112C 972, 112

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    Chatzikos M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023RMxAA..59..327C 59, 327

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Chen X., 2010, @doi [Advances in Astronomy] 10.1155/2010/638979 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AdAst2010E..72C 2010, 638979

    2010 doi

  35. [43]

    Chittenden H. G., Glazebrook K., Nanayakkara T., Kawinwanichakij L., Lagos C., Kimmig L., Remus R.-S., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2504.19696 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250419696C p. arXiv:2504.19696

    2025 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1229 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.3994C 478, 3994

    Clauwens B., Schaye J., Franx M., Bower R. G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1229 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.3994C 478, 3994

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    K., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2509.02700 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250902700C p

    Cochrane R. K., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2509.02700 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250902700C p. arXiv:2509.02700

    2025 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    arXiv:2204.02989

    Conroy C., et al., 2022, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2204.02989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220402989C p. arXiv:2204.02989

    2022 doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    Cortese L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1891 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463..170C 463, 170

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    R., Hutter A., Dayal P., Gottl \"o ber S., Heintz K

    Cueto E. R., Hutter A., Dayal P., Gottl \"o ber S., Heintz K. E., Mason C., Trebitsch M., Yepes G., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202349017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A.138C 686, A138

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    Cullen F., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad073 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520...14C 520, 14

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    Cullen F., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1211 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531..997C 531, 997

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    Curtis-Lake E., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs.tmp...66C

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    Cyr-Racine F.-Y., Sigurdson K., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.103515 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhRvD..87j3515C 87, 103515

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    L., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.21863 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250321863D p

    Danhaive A. L., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.21863 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250321863D p. arXiv:2503.21863

    2025 doi

  46. [54]

    Davidzon I., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730419 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...605A..70D 605, A70

    2017 doi

  47. [55]

    C., Birnboim Y., Mandelker N., Li Z., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.3201D 523, 3201

    Dekel A., Sarkar K. C., Birnboim Y., Mandelker N., Li Z., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.3201D 523, 3201

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    Desprez G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1084 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.2935D 530, 2935

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    Dong F., Zhao D., Han J., Li Z., Jing Y., Yang X., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5aaa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929..120D 929, 120

    2022 doi

  50. [58]

    T., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3472 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.6011D 518, 6011

    Donnan C. T., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3472 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.6011D 518, 6011

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.3222D 533, 3222

    Donnan C. T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.3222D 533, 3222

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    Donnari M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.4004D 500, 4004

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    Duncan K., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab148a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876..110D 876, 110

    2019 doi

  54. [62]

    Efstathiou G., Rosenberg E., Poulin V., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.221002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvL.132v1002E 132, 221002

    2024 doi

  55. [63]

    El-Badry K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2482 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.1930E 473, 1930

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    J., Stanway E

    Eldridge J. J., Stanway E. R., Xiao L., McClelland L. A. S., Taylor G., Ng M., Greis S. M. L., Bray J. C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2017.51 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017PASA...34...58E 34, e058

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    Emsellem E., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11752.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.379..401E 379, 401

    2007

  58. [66]

    P., Whitler L., Topping M

    Endsley R., Stark D. P., Whitler L., Topping M. W., Chen Z., Plat A., Chisholm J., Charlot S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1919 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.2312E 524, 2312

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    M., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519294 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665..265F 665, 265

    Faber S. M., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519294 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665..265F 665, 265

    2007 doi

  60. [68]

    Fakhouri O., Ma C.-P., Boylan-Kolchin M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16859.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.406.2267F 406, 2267

    2010

  61. [69]

    Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Lidz A., Zaldarriaga M., Hernquist L., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1416 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...703.1416F 703, 1416

    2009 doi

  62. [70]

    Feldmann R., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2633 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536..988F 536, 988

    2025 doi

  63. [71]

    J., Korista K

    Ferland G. J., Korista K. T., Verner D. A., Ferguson J. W., Kingdon J. B., Verner E. M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316190 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PASP..110..761F 110, 761

    1998 doi

  64. [72]

    Ferreira L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acec76 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955...94F 955, 94

    2023 doi

  65. [73]

    L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L..55F 940, L55

    Finkelstein S. L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L..55F 940, L55

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acade4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946L..13F 946, L13

    Finkelstein S. L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acade4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946L..13F 946, L13

    2023 doi

  67. [75]

    L., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad4495 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...969L...2F 969, L2

    Finkelstein S. L., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad4495 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...969L...2F 969, L2

    2024 doi

  68. [76]

    G., F \"o rster Schreiber N

    Franx M., van Dokkum P. G., F \"o rster Schreiber N. M., Wuyts S., Labb \'e I., Toft S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/592431 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...688..770F 688, 770

    2008 doi

  69. [77]

    L., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f73 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882...34F 882, 34

    Freedman W. L., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f73 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882...34F 882, 34

    2019 doi

  70. [78]

    L., Madore B

    Freedman W. L., Madore B. F., Hoyt T. J., Jang I. S., Lee A. J., Owens K. A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adce78 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...985..203F 985, 203

    2025 doi

  71. [79]

    arXiv:2402.18543

    Fujimoto S., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2402.18543 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240218543F p. arXiv:2402.18543

    2024 doi arXiv

  72. [80]

    F., Zibetti S., Brinchmann J., Kelson D

    Gallazzi A., Bell E. F., Zibetti S., Brinchmann J., Kelson D. D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/72 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788...72G 788, 72

    2014 doi

  73. [81]

    Gehrels N., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/164079 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...303..336G 303, 336

    1986 doi

  74. [82]

    C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..192G 975, 192

    Gelli V., Mason C., Hayward C. C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..192G 975, 192

    2024 doi

  75. [83]

    Genel S., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3078 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.3976G 474, 3976

    2018 doi

  76. [84]

    Glazebrook K., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.628..277G 628, 277

    2024 doi

  77. [85]

    K., Bohachevsky I., 1959, Matemati c eskij sbornik , 47(89), 271

    Godunov S. K., Bohachevsky I., 1959, Matemati c eskij sbornik , 47(89), 271

    1959

  78. [86]

    E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...39G 964, 39

    Greene J. E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...39G 964, 39

    2024 doi

  79. [87]

    Guo Y., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adc8a7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...985..181G 985, 181

    2025 doi

  80. [88]

    B., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3712 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.2598G 519, 2598

    Gurvich A. B., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3712 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.2598G 519, 2598

    2023 doi

  81. [89]

    N., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ee4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...71H 964, 71

    Hainline K. N., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ee4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...71H 964, 71

    2024 doi

  82. [90]

    Harikane Y., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...20H 259, 20

    2022 doi

  83. [91]

    Harikane Y., et al., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..265....5H 265, 5

    doi

  84. [92]

    Harikane Y., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...959...39H 959, 39

    doi

  85. [93]

    Harikane Y., Nakajima K., Ouchi M., Umeda H., Isobe Y., Ono Y., Xu Y., Zhang Y., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b7e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...960...56H 960, 56

    2024 doi

  86. [94]

    Harikane Y., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b2c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...980..138H 980, 138

    2025 doi

  87. [95]

    Harvey T., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...978...89H 978, 89

    2025 doi

  88. [96]

    C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123536 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhRvD.105l3536H 105, 123536

    Hill J. C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123536 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhRvD.105l3536H 105, 123536

    2022 doi

  89. [97]

    F., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1690 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480..800H 480, 800

    Hopkins P. F., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1690 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480..800H 480, 800

    2018 doi

  90. [98]

    F., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3489 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.3154H 519, 3154

    Hopkins P. F., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3489 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.3154H 519, 3154

    2023 doi

  91. [99]

    Hou Z., Keisler R., Knox L., Millea M., Reichardt C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.083008 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhRvD..87h3008H 87, 083008

    2013 doi

  92. [100]

    Howlett C., Lewis A., Hall A., Challinor A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/04/027 , 1204, 027

    2012 doi

  93. [101]

    Huertas-Company M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346800 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..48H 685, A48

    2024 doi

  94. [102]

    Ilbert O., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A..55I 556, A55

    2013 doi

  95. [103]

    K., Li W., Ho L

    Inayoshi K., Harikane Y., Inoue A. K., Li W., Ho L. C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9310 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...938L..10I 938, L10

    2022 doi

  96. [104]

    S., Noda H., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.03653 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241203653I p

    Inayoshi K., Kimura S. S., Noda H., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.03653 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241203653I p. arXiv:2412.03653

    2024 doi arXiv

  97. [105]

    W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.4484J 508, 4484

    Johnson J. W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.4484J 508, 4484

    2021 doi

  98. [106]

    C., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507.3540J 507, 3540

    Jones G. C., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507.3540J 507, 3540

    2021 doi

  99. [107]

    Juod z balis I., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-024-08210-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.636..594J 636, 594

    2024 doi

  100. [108]

    Kamionkowski M., Pradler J., Walker D. G. E., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.251302 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvL.113y1302K 113, 251302

    2014 doi

  101. [109]

    Kannan R., Garaldi E., Smith A., Pakmor R., Springel V., Vogelsberger M., Hernquist L., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3710 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.4005K 511, 4005

    2022 doi

  102. [110]

    Kannan R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3743 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.2594K 524, 2594

    2023 doi

  103. [111]

    arXiv:2502.20437

    Kannan R., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2502.20437 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250220437K p. arXiv:2502.20437

    2025 doi

  104. [112]

    S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acad01 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946L..15K 946, L15

    Kartaltepe J. S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acad01 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946L..15K 946, L15

    2023 doi

  105. [113]

    Karwal T., Kamionkowski M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.103523 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhRvD..94j3523K 94, 103523

    2016 doi

  106. [114]

    H., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...399L.109K 399, L109

    Katz N., Hernquist L., Weinberg D. H., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...399L.109K 399, L109

    1992 doi

  107. [116]

    C., Remus R.-S., Seidel B., Valenzuela L

    Kimmig L. C., Remus R.-S., Seidel B., Valenzuela L. M., Dolag K., Burkert A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9472 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...979...15K 979, 15

    2025 doi

  108. [117]

    Klypin A., Yepes G., Gottl \"o ber S., Prada F., He S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457.4340K 457, 4340

    2016 doi

  109. [118]

    Klypin A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab769 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504..769K 504, 769

    2021 doi

  110. [119]

    D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954L...4K 954, L4

    Kocevski D. D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954L...4K 954, L4

    2023 doi

  111. [120]

    Kohandel M., Pallottini A., Ferrara A., Zanella A., Rizzo F., Carniani S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348209 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..72K 685, A72

    2024 doi

  112. [121]

    Kurinchi-Vendhan S., Farcy M., Hirschmann M., Valentino F., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2297 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.3974K 534, 3974

    2024 doi

  113. [122]

    Labb \'e I., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.616..266L 616, 266

    2023 doi

  114. [123]

    Lagos C. d. P., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.2324L 536, 2324

    2025 doi

  115. [124]

    Lange R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1495 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.1470L 462, 1470

    2016 doi

  116. [125]

    L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acfed4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...958..141L 958, 141

    Larson R. L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acfed4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...958..141L 958, 141

    2023 doi

  117. [126]

    Leethochawalit N., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac959b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...942L..26L 942, L26

    2023 doi

  118. [127]

    Leja J., Tacchella S., Conroy C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2f8c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880L...9L 880, L9

    2019 doi

  119. [128]

    Lewis A., Challinor A., Lasenby A., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309179 , 538, 473

    2000 doi

  120. [129]

    C., Aung H., Giavalisco M., Mandelker N., Tacchella S., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2311.14662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231114662L p

    Li Z., Dekel A., Sarkar K. C., Aung H., Giavalisco M., Mandelker N., Tacchella S., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2311.14662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231114662L p. arXiv:2311.14662

    2023 doi arXiv

  121. [130]

    C., Harrison I., Harikane Y., Tacchella S., Wilkins S

    Lovell C. C., Harrison I., Harikane Y., Tacchella S., Wilkins S. M., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3224 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.2511L 518, 2511

    doi

  122. [131]

    C., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2550 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.5520L 525, 5520

    Lovell C. C., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2550 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.5520L 525, 5520

    doi

  123. [132]

    C., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2411.13960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241113960L p

    Lovell C. C., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2411.13960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241113960L p. arXiv:2411.13960

    2024 doi

  124. [133]

    S., Bose S., Lacey C

    Lu S., Frenk C. S., Bose S., Lacey C. G., Cole S., Baugh C. M., Helly J. C., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2646 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.1018L 536, 1018

    2025 doi

  125. [134]

    Madau P., Dickinson M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA&A..52..415M 52, 415

    2014 doi

  126. [135]

    Maiolino R., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf359 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.538.1921M 538, 1921

    2025 doi

  127. [136]

    Marsh D. J. E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhR...643....1M 643, 1

    2016 doi

  128. [137]

    A., Trenti M., Treu T., 2015, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/21 , 813, 21

    Mason C. A., Trenti M., Treu T., 2015, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/21 , 813, 21

    2015 doi

  129. [138]

    A., Trenti M., Treu T., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521..497M 521, 497

    Mason C. A., Trenti M., Treu T., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521..497M 521, 497

    2023 doi

  130. [139]

    Matthee J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963..129M 963, 129

    2024 doi

  131. [140]

    J., McLure R

    McLeod D. J., McLure R. J., Dunlop J. S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw904 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459.3812M 459, 3812

    2016 doi

  132. [141]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3471 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.5004M 527, 5004

    McLeod D. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3471 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.5004M 527, 5004

    2024 doi

  133. [142]

    Merlin E., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2615 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.3309M 490, 3309

    2019 doi

  134. [143]

    R., Heckman T

    Meurer G. R., Heckman T. M., Calzetti D., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307523 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...521...64M 521, 64

    1999 doi

  135. [144]

    R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3578 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519..843M 519, 843

    Mirocha J., Furlanetto S. R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3578 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519..843M 519, 843

    2023 doi

  136. [145]

    J., Mao S., White S

    Mo H. J., Mao S., White S. D. M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01227.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.295..319M 295, 319

    1998

  137. [146]

    Morishita T., Stiavelli M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acbf50 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946L..35M 946, L35

    2023 doi

  138. [147]

    Morishita T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae68c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...867..150M 867, 150

    2018 doi

  139. [148]

    P., Naab T., White S

    Moster B. P., Naab T., White S. D. M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1822M 477, 1822

    2018 doi

  140. [149]

    B., Mirocha J., Furlanetto S., Sabti N., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526L..47M 526, L47

    Mu \ n oz J. B., Mirocha J., Furlanetto S., Sabti N., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526L..47M 526, L47

    2023 doi

  141. [150]

    Murray S., 2014, HMF: Halo Mass Function calculator , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1412.006 ( @eprint ascl 1412.006 )

    2014

  142. [151]

    G., Power C., Robotham A

    Murray S. G., Power C., Robotham A. S. G., 2013, @doi [Astronomy and Computing] 10.1016/j.ascom.2013.11.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&C.....3...23M 3, 23

    2013 doi

  143. [152]

    Muzzin A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...777...18M 777, 18

    2013 doi

  144. [153]

    P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L..14N 940, L14

    Naidu R. P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L..14N 940, L14

    2022 doi

  145. [154]

    P., et al., 2025a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250316596N p

    Naidu R. P., et al., 2025a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250316596N p. arXiv:2503.16596

    doi arXiv

  146. [155]

    P., et al., 2025b, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.11263 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250511263N p

    Naidu R. P., et al., 2025b, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.11263 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250511263N p. arXiv:2505.11263

    doi

  147. [156]

    P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1206N 477, 1206

    Naiman J. P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1206N 477, 1206

    2018 doi

  148. [157]

    Nanayakkara T., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ada6ac , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...981...78N 981, 78

    2025 doi

  149. [158]

    Narayanan D., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0966 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961...73N 961, 73

    2024 doi

  150. [159]

    Nelson D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..624N 475, 624

    2018 doi

  151. [160]

    Nelson E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7b17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976L..27N 976, L27

    2024 doi

  152. [161]

    Obreschkow D., Glazebrook K., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...784...26O 784, 26

    2014 doi

  153. [162]

    A., Bouwens R

    Oesch P. A., Bouwens R. J., Illingworth G. D., Labb \'e I., Stefanon M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab03f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...855..105O 855, 105

    2018 doi

  154. [163]

    Pacifici C., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/79 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832...79P 832, 79

    2016 doi

  155. [164]

    Pacucci F., Narayan R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976...96P 976, 96

    2024 doi

  156. [165]

    Pacucci F., Nguyen B., Carniani S., Maiolino R., Fan X., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0158 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...957L...3P 957, L3

    2023 doi

  157. [166]

    J., Ohlmann S

    Pakmor R., Springel V., Bauer A., Mocz P., Munoz D. J., Ohlmann S. T., Schaal K., Zhu C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2380 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.1134P 455, 1134

    2016 doi

  158. [167]

    Pakmor R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3620 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.2539P 524, 2539

    2023 doi

  159. [168]

    Parashari P., Laha R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526L..63P 526, L63

    2023 doi

  160. [169]

    Parlanti E., Carniani S., Pallottini A., Cignoni M., Cresci G., Kohandel M., Mannucci F., Marconi A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245603 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A.153P 673, A153

    2023 doi

  161. [170]

    Peng Y.-j., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...721..193P 721, 193

    2010 doi

  162. [171]

    G., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acd9d0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951L...1P 951, L1

    P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez P. G., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acd9d0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951L...1P 951, L1

    2023 doi

  163. [172]

    Pillepich A., et al., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2656 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.4077P 473, 4077

    doi

  164. [173]

    Pillepich A., et al., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3112 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..648P 475, 648

    doi

  165. [174]

    Pillepich A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.3196P 490, 3196

    2019 doi

  166. [175]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A...6P 641, A6

    2020 doi

  167. [176]

    Popesso P., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3214 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.1526P 519, 1526

    2023 doi

  168. [177]

    L., Grin D., Karwal T., Kamionkowski M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvD..98h3525P 98, 083525

    Poulin V., Smith T. L., Grin D., Karwal T., Kamionkowski M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvD..98h3525P 98, 083525

    2018 doi

  169. [178]

    L., Karwal T., Kamionkowski M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.221301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PhRvL.122v1301P 122, 221301

    Poulin V., Smith T. L., Karwal T., Kamionkowski M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.221301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PhRvL.122v1301P 122, 221301

    2019 doi

  170. [179]

    L., Karwal T., 2023, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2023.101348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PDU....4201348P 42, 101348

    Poulin V., Smith T. L., Karwal T., 2023, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2023.101348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PDU....4201348P 42, 101348

    2023

  171. [180]

    L., Calder \'o n R., Simon T., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.08051 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250508051P p

    Poulin V., Smith T. L., Calder \'o n R., Simon T., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.08051 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250508051P p. arXiv:2505.08051

    2025 doi arXiv

  172. [181]

    H., Schechter P., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/152650 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...187..425P 187, 425

    Press W. H., Schechter P., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/152650 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...187..425P 187, 425

    1974 doi

  173. [182]

    H., Rai c evi \'c M., Schaye J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt066 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.2427R 430, 2427

    Rahmati A., Pawlik A. H., Rai c evi \'c M., Schaye J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt066 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.2427R 430, 2427

    2013 doi

  174. [183]

    A., Topping M

    Reddy N. A., Topping M. W., Sanders R. L., Shapley A. E., Brammer G., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acd754 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...952..167R 952, 167

    2023 doi

  175. [184]

    G., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934L...7R 934, L7

    Riess A. G., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934L...7R 934, L7

    2022 doi

  176. [185]

    G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...977..120R 977, 120

    Riess A. G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...977..120R 977, 120

    2024 doi

  177. [186]

    R., Powell D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2295 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507.3952R 507, 3952

    Rizzo F., Vegetti S., Fraternali F., Stacey H. R., Powell D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2295 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507.3952R 507, 3952

    2021 doi

  178. [187]

    Roberts-Borsani G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad85d3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976..193R 976, 193

    2024 doi

  179. [188]

    E., et al., 2023a, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01921-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs.tmp...67R

    Robertson B. E., et al., 2023a, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01921-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs.tmp...67R

    doi

  180. [189]

    E., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aca086 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...942L..42R 942, L42

    Robertson B. E., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aca086 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...942L..42R 942, L42

    doi

  181. [190]

    Robertson B., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad463d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...970...31R 970, 31

    2024 doi

  182. [191]

    Rodr \' guez-Puebla A., Behroozi P., Primack J., Klypin A., Lee C., Hellinger D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1705 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462..893R 462, 893

    2016 doi

  183. [192]

    R., Avila-Reese V., Faber S

    Rodr \' guez-Puebla A., Primack J. R., Avila-Reese V., Faber S. M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1172 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470..651R 470, 651

    2017 doi

  184. [193]

    B., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu558 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.440.3714R 440, 3714

    Rogers A. B., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu558 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.440.3714R 440, 3714

    2014 doi

  185. [194]

    Roman-Oliveira F., Fraternali F., Rizzo F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad530 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.1045R 521, 1045

    2023 doi

  186. [195]

    J., et al., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250615811R p

    Roper W. J., et al., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250615811R p. arXiv:2506.15811

    2025 arXiv

  187. [196]

    E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2217 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535.2068R 535, 2068

    Rowland L. E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2217 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535.2068R 535, 2068

    2024 doi

  188. [197]

    B., Kamionkowski M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.061002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvL.132f1002S 132, 061002

    Sabti N., Mu \ n oz J. B., Kamionkowski M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.061002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvL.132f1002S 132, 061002

    2024 doi

  189. [198]

    Santini P., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...538A..33S 538, A33

    2012 doi

  190. [199]

    Schreiber C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...618A..85S 618, A85

    2018 doi

  191. [200]

    A., Conroy C., Chandra V., Hernquist L., Nelson D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad150a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962...84S 962, 84

    Semenov V. A., Conroy C., Chandra V., Hernquist L., Nelson D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad150a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962...84S 962, 84

    2024 doi

  192. [201]

    Shen X., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1423 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.4747S 495, 4747

    2020 doi

  193. [202]

    Shen X., Vogelsberger M., Nelson D., Tacchella S., Hernquist L., Springel V., Marinacci F., Torrey P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3794 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.5560S 510, 5560

    2022 doi

  194. [203]

    Shen X., Vogelsberger M., Boylan-Kolchin M., Tacchella S., Kannan R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.3254S 525, 3254

    2023 doi

  195. [204]

    Shen X., et al., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.2835S 527, 2835

    doi

  196. [205]

    P., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.3923S 533, 3923

    Shen X., Vogelsberger M., Boylan-Kolchin M., Tacchella S., Naidu R. P., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.3923S 533, 3923

    doi

  197. [206]

    Shen X., et al., 2024c, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.1433S 534, 1433

    doi

  198. [207]

    arXiv:2503.01949

    Shen X., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.01949 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250301949S p. arXiv:2503.01949

    2025 doi

  199. [209]

    Shuntov M., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452570 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A..20S 695, A20

    2025 doi

  200. [210]

    arXiv:2508.04410

    Simmonds C., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2508.04410 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250804410S p. arXiv:2508.04410

    2025 doi

  201. [211]

    C., Kassin S

    Simons R. C., Kassin S. A., Weiner B. J., Heckman T. M., Lee J. C., Lotz J. M., Peth M., Tchernyshyov K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1298 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452..986S 452, 986

    2015 doi

  202. [213]

    L., Poulin V., Amin M

    Smith T. L., Poulin V., Amin M. A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063523 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PhRvD.101f3523S 101, 063523

    2020 doi

  203. [214]

    L., Lucca M., Poulin V., Abellan G

    Smith T. L., Lucca M., Poulin V., Abellan G. F., Balkenhol L., Benabed K., Galli S., Murgia R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043526 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhRvD.106d3526S 106, 043526

    2022 doi

  204. [215]

    Song M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825....5S 825, 5

    2016 doi

  205. [216]

    S., Steinhardt C

    Speagle J. S., Steinhardt C. L., Capak P. L., Silverman J. D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..214...15S 214, 15

    2014 doi

  206. [217]

    Springel V., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.401..791S 401, 791

    2010

  207. [218]

    Springel V., Hernquist L., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06206.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.339..289S 339, 289

    2003

  208. [219]

    Springel V., White S. D. M., Tormen G., Kauffmann G., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04912.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.328..726S 328, 726

    2001

  209. [220]

    Springel V., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3304 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..676S 475, 676

    2018 doi

  210. [221]

    Springel V., Pakmor R., Zier O., Reinecke M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1855 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.2871S 506, 2871

    2021 doi

  211. [222]

    R., Eldridge J

    Stanway E. R., Eldridge J. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1353 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479...75S 479, 75

    2018 doi

  212. [223]

    Stefanon M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3792 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883...99S 883, 99

    2019 doi

  213. [224]

    J., Labb \'e I., Illingworth G

    Stefanon M., Bouwens R. J., Labb \'e I., Illingworth G. D., Gonzalez V., Oesch P. A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1bb6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...922...29S 922, 29

    2021 doi

  214. [225]

    C., Shen X., Wetzel A., Cochrane R

    Sun G., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Hayward C. C., Shen X., Wetzel A., Cochrane R. K., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acf85a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955L..35S 955, L35

    2023 doi

  215. [226]

    C., Zhuang M.-Y., Ma C., Chen C., Li R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acf1f6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...960..104S 960, 104

    Sun W., Ho L. C., Zhuang M.-Y., Ma C., Chen C., Li R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acf1f6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...960..104S 960, 104

    2024 doi

  216. [227]

    Svrcek P., Witten E., 2006, @doi [Journal of High Energy Physics] 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/06/051 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006JHEP...06..051S 2006, 051

    2006 doi

  217. [228]

    M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/768/2/L37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...768L..37T 768, L37

    Tacchella S., Trenti M., Carollo C. M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/768/2/L37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...768L..37T 768, L37

    2013 doi

  218. [229]

    J., Johnson B

    Tacchella S., Bose S., Conroy C., Eisenstein D. J., Johnson B. D., 2018, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e0 , 868, 92

    2018 doi

  219. [230]

    Tacchella S., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1657 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.5416T 487, 5416

    2019 doi

  220. [231]

    Tacchella S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac449b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...926..134T 926, 134

    2022 doi

  221. [232]

    A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa374 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.1888T 493, 1888

    Terrazas B. A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa374 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.1888T 493, 1888

    2020 doi

  222. [233]

    Thob A. C. R., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz448 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485..972T 485, 972

    2019 doi

  223. [234]

    L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1692 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506..323T 506, 323

    Tiley A. L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1692 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506..323T 506, 323

    2021 doi

  224. [235]

    W., et al., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.3301T 529, 3301

    Topping M. W., et al., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.3301T 529, 3301

    doi

  225. [236]

    W., et al., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae800 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.4087T 529, 4087

    Topping M. W., et al., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae800 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.4087T 529, 4087

    doi

  226. [237]

    Trinca A., Schneider R., Valiante R., Graziani L., Ferrotti A., Omukai K., Chon S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae651 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.3563T 529, 3563

    2024 doi

  227. [238]

    Turner C., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf128 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.537.1826T 537, 1826

    2025 doi

  228. [239]

    \"U bler H., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab27cc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880...48U 880, 48

    2019 doi

  229. [240]

    Valentino F., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acbefa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...947...20V 947, 20

    2023 doi

  230. [241]

    Vogelsberger M., Genel S., Sijacki D., Torrey P., Springel V., Hernquist L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1789 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.3031V 436, 3031

    2013 doi

  231. [242]

    Vogelsberger M., et al., 2014a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1536 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444.1518V 444, 1518

    doi

  232. [243]

    Vogelsberger M., et al., 2014b, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature13316 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Natur.509..177V 509, 177

    doi

  233. [244]

    Vogelsberger M., Marinacci F., Torrey P., Puchwein E., 2020a, @doi [Nature Reviews Physics] 10.1038/s42254-019-0127-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatRP...2...42V 2, 42

    doi

  234. [245]

    Vogelsberger M., et al., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa137 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.5167V 492, 5167

    doi

  235. [246]

    arXiv:2403.02399

    Wang T., et al., 2024a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02399 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240302399W p. arXiv:2403.02399

    doi arXiv

  236. [247]

    Wang B., et al., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad187c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963...74W 963, 74

    doi

  237. [248]

    Wang B., et al., 2024c, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...969L..13W 969, L13

    doi

  238. [249]

    arXiv:2505.05554

    Wang Z., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.05554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250505554W p. arXiv:2505.05554

    2025 doi

  239. [250]

    R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.184W 677, A184

    Weaver J. R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.184W 677, A184

    2023 doi

  240. [251]

    Weibel A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1891 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.1808W 533, 1808

    2024 doi

  241. [252]

    Weibel A., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adab7a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...983...11W 983, 11

    2025 doi

  242. [253]

    Weinberger R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2944 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.3291W 465, 3291

    2017 doi

  243. [254]

    Weinberger R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1733 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.4056W 479, 4056

    2018 doi

  244. [255]

    Weinberger R., Springel V., Pakmor R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..248...32W 248, 32

    2020 doi

  245. [256]

    Wiersma R. P. C., Schaye J., Smith B. D., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14191.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.393...99W 393, 99

    2009

  246. [257]

    M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa649 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.6079W 493, 6079

    Wilkins S. M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa649 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.6079W 493, 6079

    2020 doi

  247. [258]

    Wisnioski E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/209 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799..209W 799, 209

    2015 doi

  248. [259]

    Xiao M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-024-08094-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.635..311X 635, 311

    2024 doi

  249. [260]

    Xu Y., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad82dd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976..142X 976, 142

    2024 doi

  250. [261]

    Yan H., Ma Z., Ling C., Cheng C., Huang J.-S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aca80c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...942L...9Y 942, L9

    2023 doi

  251. [262]

    Yung L. Y. A., Somerville R. S., Finkelstein S. L., Wilkins S. M., Gardner J. P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.5929Y 527, 5929

    2024 doi

  252. [263]

    Zana T., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.1524Z 515, 1524

    2022 doi

  253. [264]

    Zinger E., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2607 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499..768Z 499, 768

    2020 doi

  254. [266]

    de Graaff A., et al., 2025b, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-024-02424-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025NatAs...9..280D 9, 280

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.