Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Excitons in a 2D Wigner crystal become Bloch-band polarons, with strong damping only at intermediate electron densities.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 15:22 UTC pith:P2S3IBYG

load-bearing objection Plausible first theory of exciton-phonon coupling in a Wigner crystal, but the predicted high-density revival may occur after the crystal melts. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.16888 v2 pith:P2S3IBYG submitted 2025-12-18 cond-mat.str-el

Exciton interacting with the phonons of an electronic Wigner crystal

Jens Havgaard Nyhegn , Esben Rohan Christensen , Georg M. Bruun This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Wigner crystalexciton-phonon couplingBloch polaronself-consistent Born approximationumklapp scatteringvan der Waals heterostructuresexciton spectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a quantum-field-theory description of an exciton placed in a layer next to a two-dimensional electronic Wigner crystal, asking what the crystal's gapless lattice vibrations do to the exciton spectrum. It finds that the exciton couples to these phonons through a Fröhlich-type vertex derived from the charge-dipole interaction, and that phonon emission within a Bloch band or between bands dresses the exciton into a quasiparticle: a Bloch polaron. The central prediction is that damping of the excited exciton band is non-monotonic in electron density — weak at low density because the coupling is small, strong at intermediate density when resonant interband phonon emission becomes possible, and weak again at high density because the exciton band separation outgrows the phonon continuum. This matters because the umklapp peak observed in Wigner-crystal optical spectroscopy carries a density-dependent phonon signature that must be included when interpreting experiments.

Core claim

The paper shows that the gapless phonons of a 2D Wigner crystal renormalize a nearby exciton into a Bloch-band polaron. Expanding the charge-dipole exciton-electron interaction to first order in electron displacements gives a Fröhlich-like vertex g_{q,G,λ} = -i sqrt(N/(2m_e ω_{qλ})) (q+G)·ε_{qλ} V_ex(q+G). A self-consistent Born approximation for the Bloch-basis Green's function then shows that intra- and interband phonon emission dress the exciton into a polaron. Damping of the first excited band is set by whether its energy lies inside the interband phonon-emission continuum; since the coupling grows with density while the band separation grows faster, strong damping occurs only at interme

What carries the argument

The central object is a Fröhlich-like exciton–phonon vertex, g_{q,G,λ} = -i sqrt(N/(2m_e ω_{qλ})) (q+G)·ε_{qλ} V_ex(q+G), obtained by expanding the charge-dipole interaction V_ex(r) = -κ/(d^2+r^2)^2 to first order in the electron displacements from the static Wigner lattice. The phonon modes are computed in the harmonic approximation with Ewald summation, giving a gapless transverse mode (ω∝q) and a longitudinal mode (ω∝√q). The argument is carried by a self-consistent Born approximation (SCBA) for the retarded exciton Green's function in the Bloch basis: a 2×2 matrix Dyson equation whose self-energies sum non-crossing rainbow diagrams to infinite order, capturing intra- and interband phonon

Load-bearing premise

That the Wigner crystal's phonons are accurately described as undamped harmonic oscillators and that the exciton-phonon coupling can be truncated at first order in the electron displacements.

What would settle it

Measure the linewidth of the umklapp exciton peak in a TMD heterostructure Wigner crystal as a function of electron density while staying below the melting density. The theory predicts non-monotonic behavior: narrow at low density, a maximum around n≈1×10^11 cm⁻², and narrow again at higher density. A monotonic increase in linewidth with density, or a linewidth that stays broad at the highest accessible densities, would contradict the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The ground-state (m=0) exciton remains well defined at all densities considered, slightly red-shifted by virtual phonon emission.
  • The first excited (m=1) band is substantially broadened only when its energy lies inside the interband phonon-emission continuum; at high densities it becomes well defined again, making the damping non-monotonic in density.
  • In the plane-wave spectrum measured by optics, the umklapp peak is strongly broadened by phonons only at intermediate densities, roughly 0.5–2×10^11 cm⁻² for the parameters studied.
  • The energy difference between the lowest and first umklapp peak stays proportional to electron density, but the extracted exciton mass is renormalized by a factor of about 1.43 relative to the bare mass.
  • The dimensionless exciton-phonon coupling grows with density (γ²∝√n), yet observable phonon effects can still shrink because of the growing mismatch between phonon and exciton band energies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predicted re-entrant sharpening is observed — the umklapp peak broadens and then narrows again as density is raised — it would cleanly separate phonon-induced broadening from static disorder, which typically produces monotonic broadening.
  • The quantitative density window depends on the assumption that the phonon modes are undamped and harmonic; a phonon spectral function with finite lifetimes or anharmonic corrections could shift or wash out the non-monotonic signature.
  • The same Bloch-polaron machinery could be extended to excitons coupled to other gapless bosonic modes in van der Waals heterostructures (for instance, magnons or same-layer phonons), where the resonance condition would again be set by how the boson and exciton dispersions scale with a control parameter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a field-theoretic description of an exciton in a separate layer coupled to the phonons of a two-dimensional electronic Wigner crystal. Starting from the charge-dipole interaction between the exciton and the electrons, the authors derive a Fröhlich-type exciton-phonon vertex, compute the harmonic phonon spectrum of the triangular Wigner crystal, and solve a self-consistent Born approximation (SCBA) for the exciton Green's function truncated to the two lowest Bloch bands. The main physical prediction is that the m=1 Bloch exciton is strongly damped at intermediate electron densities, where it lies inside the interband phonon-emission continuum, but becomes sharp again at higher densities when it exits that continuum. The paper also analyses the plane-wave spectral function and extracts a density-dependent umklapp gap that is used to infer a renormalized exciton mass.

Significance. If the numerical results are correct, the paper fills an important gap between the static mean-field Bloch-band description of Wigner-crystal excitons and the recent experiments reporting umklapp branches and phonon-related spectral features. The microscopic derivation of the vertex and the use of a non-perturbative SCBA with a documented sum-rule check (spectral functions integrate to 2π within 0.3%) are strengths, as is the clear, falsifiable prediction that the damping is nonmonotonic in density. However, the quantitative claims currently rest on an unstated parameter set, a likely algebraic error in the mass-extraction formula, and an unvalidated two-band truncation; these need to be addressed before the central conclusions can be considered robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III A and §III B, Figs. 5–6] The predicted nonmonotonic damping and, in particular, the high-density revival at n=2×10^11 cm^-2 depend on this density lying inside the Wigner-crystal phase. The paper never states the electron effective mass m_e* and dielectric constant ε_r used for the phonon spectrum and densities, nor the definition of γ quoted in Fig. 5. For the TMD parameters cited in the paper (ε_r≈4.35–4.5, m_e*≈0.5 m_0), r_s at n=2×10^11 cm^-2 is about 27, below the QMC melting threshold r_s≈30 quoted in the Introduction; for m_e*≈0.6 m_0 it is about 32. The authors must specify the parameters and show that all densities in Figs. 5 and 6 are within the WC phase. Without this, the high-density sharpening may be an artifact of using a density at which the WC has already melted.
  2. [§III B, Eq. (12) and following fit] The fitting formula ΔE=|G|²/(2m_x)=n/(√3 m_x) is algebraically incorrect for the triangular lattice defined in Sec. I. With a1=a(√3,1)/2 and a2=a(−√3,1)/2, n=2/(√3 a²) and the shortest reciprocal-lattice vector has |G|²=16π²/(3a²), so |G|²/(2m_x)=(4π²/√3)n/m_x, not n/(√3 m_x). The quoted mass renormalization m_x/m̅x≈1.43 is therefore not supported as stated. Please correct the formula and re-evaluate the extracted mass; if the incorrect equality is only a typographical error, state the actual fitting function used.
  3. [§II, Eq. (10), and §III] The SCBA is restricted to the two lowest Bloch bands (m=0,1), with the statement that higher bands are weakly coupled, but no quantitative justification is presented. The central results—the m=1 broadening and the continuum boundaries—could be modified by additional interband decay channels and spectral weight from m≥2. Provide numerical estimates of the interband vertices involving higher bands or a convergence check (e.g., including m=2 in the truncated subspace) to support the truncation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§III A] References to 'Fig. 2(b)' and 'Fig. 2(c)' in the text should be 'Fig. 5(b)' and 'Fig. 5(c)'; Fig. 2 shows Bloch bands, not spectral functions.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A14)] The displayed expression for the vertex contains garbled symbols ('⌟roo⟪⟪op' etc.). It should read i sqrt(N/(2m_e^* ω_{qλ})) (q+G)·ε_{qλ} V_ex(q+G) (with ħ=1).
  3. [References [35]–[37]] References [35]–[37] contain 'arXiv:2512.XXXX' placeholders; these must be completed before submission.
  4. [§I B, Eq. (8)] Equation (8) is presented as a derivation of the interaction strength but is a dimensional estimate with several unwritten assumptions (e.g., V_ex(1/a)∼−κ/d², typical phonon momentum 1/a). Please state its status and define γ explicitly, since Sec. III A uses γ=0.04, 0.08, and 0.1 without giving the defining relation.
  5. [§I, Eq. (1)] The definition of κ after Eq. (1) appears to omit factors of 4π in the SI convention. Specify the precise expression (including the polarizability α) so that the parameter values are reproducible.
  6. [§IV] There are several typos in the Conclusions: 'Finaly,' 'a a fascinating research direction', and 'quantum probe probe'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the model is self-contained; the only fitting step is an explicit effective-mass extraction, not an input to the central calculation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) is built from the bare exciton dispersion, the charge-dipole potential (Eq. 1), the Wigner-crystal lattice, and the harmonic phonon matrix (Eqs. A3–A5); the exciton-phonon vertex (Eq. 3 and Eq. A14) is obtained by expanding the same interaction to first order in electron displacements. The Bloch bands (Eq. 4) and phonon dispersions (Eq. 6) are computed from these inputs, and the SCBA self-energy (Eq. 10) uses those vertices and propagators with no fitted couplings. The central non-monotonic broadening result follows from solving the Dyson equation and comparing the m=1 pole with the interband emission continuum; the reported scalings (ω_C ∝ n^{3/4}, ε_1 ∝ n) rationalize the physics but do not inject the conclusion by construction. The only fitting appears at the end, where the authors explicitly state that they numerically extract ΔE and fit it to ΔE = |G|^2/2m_x to obtain m_x/m̄_x ≃ 1.43; this is presented as a fit, not as an input to the spectral calculation, and it is not load-bearing for the main polaron-broadening result. Self-citations to earlier SCBA work are supported by independent Monte-Carlo benchmarks and experimental comparisons, and the Ewald-sum method citation is a standard numerical tool. The concern that the high-density case n = 2×10^11 cm^-2 may lie beyond the Wigner-crystal melting boundary is a parameter-regime/validity issue, not a circularity of the derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new fundamental entities are introduced. The free parameters are standard material parameters and one fitted mass from the numerical spectra. The main unverified assumptions are the generalization of SCBA to phonons and the two-band truncation.

free parameters (4)
  • relative permittivity ε_r and exciton polarizability α = ε_r between 4.35 and 4.5; α between 0.9e-36 and 1.45e-36 C m^2/V
    Taken from TMD literature to set κ in the charge-dipole interaction, Eq. (1). Not fitted to the calculated spectra, but controls all quantitative outputs.
  • separability parameter κ/d^4 = 100 meV for the main figures
    Chosen by hand as a representative value of the interaction strength; the paper acknowledges results depend on it.
  • effective exciton mass m_x = m_x = 1.43 mbar_x extracted from the density dependence of ΔE
    Extracted by fitting the numerical pole separation ΔE to ΔE = |G|^2 / (2 m_x) = n / (sqrt(3) m_x). This is a fit to the output of the model, not a parameter-free prediction.
  • phonon dispersion parameters ω_C and η = ω_C = sqrt(Q^2/(m_e a^3)); η = 0.25
    ω_C is the standard definition of the Wigner crystal characteristic phonon energy; η = 0.25 is an assumed constant in the long-wavelength dispersion fit (and is used in Eq. (6)).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Harmonic approximation for the Wigner crystal phonons
    Used in Appendix A (Eqs. A3-A5) to derive phonon dispersion; ignores anharmonicity and phonon damping, which could alter the scattering continuum.
  • domain assumption Electron–exciton interaction is the charge-dipole potential V_ex(r) = -κ/(d^2+r^2)^2
    Assumed valid for distances larger than the exciton radius, Eq. (1); for the geometry considered, this is standard but only an approximation.
  • ad hoc to paper The two-band truncation (m=0,1) is sufficient and higher Bloch bands can be neglected
    Justified by weak coupling to higher bands, but unquantified; the SCBA self-energy of Eq. (10) includes only two bands, so the continuum of higher bands is ignored.
  • domain assumption SCBA (non-crossing rainbow diagrams) is quantitatively accurate for a phonon-coupled exciton
    Motivated by analogy to holes in antiferromagnets (Refs. [20-26]), where SCBA works well, but no benchmark for the phonon case is given.
  • standard math The Wigner crystal is the ground state and its density sets the lattice constant a = 1/sqrt(n)
    Standard relation for a triangular lattice, used to map density to all model parameters.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12161 in / 8190 out tokens · 59054 ms · 2026-08-03T15:22:10.252077+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

With the advent of atomically thin and tunable van der Waals materials, a two-dimensional electronic Wigner crystal has recently been observed. The smoking gun signal was the appearance of an umklapp branch in optical exciton spectroscopy coming from the periodic potential generated by the Wigner crystal assumed to be static. Vibrations of the Wigner crystal however leads to a gapless phonon spectrum, which may affect the exciton spectrum. To explore this, we develop a field theoretical description of an exciton interacting with electrons forming a Wigner crystal including the coupling to the phonons. We show that importance of the exciton-phonon coupling scales with the exciton-electron interaction strength relative to the typical phonon energy squared. The motion of the exciton leads to two kinds of scattering processes, where the exciton emits a phonon either staying within the same Bloch band (intraband scattering) or changing its band (interband scattering). Using a non-perturbative self-consistent Born approximation, we demonstrate that these scattering processes lead to the formation of quasiparticles (polarons) consisting of the exciton in Bloch states dressed by Wigner crystal phonons. The energy shift and damping of these polarons depend on the electron density in a non-trivial way since it affects both the exciton-phonon interaction strength, as well as the phonon and exciton spectra. In particular, the damping is strongly affected by whether the polaron energy is inside the gapless phonon scattering continuum or not. Using these results, we finally analyse their effects on the observed spectral properties of the exciton.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.16888 by Esben Rohan Christensen, Georg M. Bruun, Jens Havgaard Nyhegn.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) An exciton in the top layer interacts with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Contour plot of the lowest ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Feynman diagrams for the exciton self-energies associ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Diagonal exciton spectral functions in the Bloch band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Exciton spectral functions in the plane wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Theory of two-dimensional Wigner crystals with defects: Interactions, melting transitions and collective modes

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Analytical defect-interaction energies and vacancy-density-dependent phonon speeds for 2D Wigner crystals, derived via fracton-elasticity duality.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Phys

    E. Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Phys. Rev.46, 1002 (1934)

    1934

  2. [2]

    N. D. Drummond and R. J. Needs, Phase diagram of the low-density two-dimensional homogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 126402 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalco- genides, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 021001 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Y. Zhou, J. Sung, E. Brutschea, I. Esterlis, Y. Wang, G. Scuri, R. J. Gelly, H. Heo, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, G. Zar´ and, M. D. Lukin, P. Kim, E. Demler, and H. Park, Bilayer wigner crystals in a transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructure, Nature595, 48 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Smole´ nski, P

    T. Smole´ nski, P. E. Dolgirev, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Popert, Y. Shimazaki, P. Back, X. Lu, M. Kroner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Esterlis, E. Demler, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Signatures of wigner crystal of electrons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nature595, 53 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    J. Sung, J. Wang, I. Esterlis, P. A. Volkov, G. Scuri, Y. Zhou, E. Brutschea, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Yang, M. A. Morales, S. Zhang, A. J. Millis, M. D. Lukin, P. Kim, E. Demler, and H. Park, An electronic microemulsion phase emerging from a quantum crystal- to-liquid transition, Nature Physics21, 437 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Xiang, H

    Z. Xiang, H. Li, J. Xiao, M. H. Naik, Z. Ge, Z. He, S. Chen, J. Nie, S. Li, Y. Jiang, R. Sailus, R. Banerjee, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, S. G. Louie, M. F. Crommie, and F. Wang, Imaging quantum melting in a disordered 2d wigner solid, Science388, 736 (2025), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.ado7136

    doi:10.1126/science.ado7136 2025

  8. [8]

    S.-D. Chen, R. Qi, H.-L. Kim, Q. Feng, R. Xia, D. Abeysinghe, J. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D.- H. Lee, and F. Wang, Terahertz electrodynamics in a zero-field wigner crystal (2025), arXiv:2509.10624 [cond- mat.mes-hall]. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Shimazaki, C

    Y. Shimazaki, C. Kuhlenkamp, I. Schwartz, T. Smole´ nski, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kroner, R. Schmidt, M. Knap, and A. m. c. Imamo˘ glu, Optical signatures of periodic charge distribution in a mott-like correlated insulator state, Phys. Rev. X11, 021027 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Erkensten, A

    D. Erkensten, A. Chernikov, and E. Malic, Impact of an electron wigner crystal on exciton propagation (2025), arXiv:2512.13512 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Pichler, M

    F. Pichler, M. Hafezi, and M. Knap, Purely elec- tronic model for exciton-polaron formation in moir´ e het- erostructures (2025), arXiv:2503.07712 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Massignan, R

    P. Massignan, R. Schmidt, G. E. Astrakharchik, A. ˙Imamoglu, M. Zwierlein, J. J. Arlt, and G. M. Bruun, Polarons in atomic gases and two-dimensional semicon- ductors (2025), arXiv:2501.09618 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Landau and S

    L. Landau and S. Pekar, Effective mass of the polaron, J. Exp. Theor. Phys423, 71 (1948)

    1948

  14. [14]

    D. K. Efimkin, E. K. Laird, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, and A. H. MacDonald, Electron-exciton interactions in the exciton-polaron problem, Phys. Rev. B103, 075417 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    C. Fey, P. Schmelcher, A. Imamoglu, and R. Schmidt, Theory of exciton-electron scattering in atomically thin semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B101, 195417 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Bruus and K

    H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2004)

    2004

  17. [17]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics (Holt-Saunders, 1976)

    1976

  18. [18]

    G. M. Bruun and D. R. Nelson, Quantum hexatic order in two-dimensional dipolar and charged fluids, Phys. Rev. B89, 094112 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    D. S. Fisher, B. I. Halperin, and R. Morf, Defects in the two-dimensional electron solid and implications for melting, Phys. Rev. B20, 4692 (1979)

    1979

  20. [20]

    C. L. Kane, P. A. Lee, and N. Read, Motion of a single hole in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B39, 6880 (1989)

    1989

  21. [21]

    Martinez and P

    G. Martinez and P. Horsch, Spin polarons in the t-j model, Phys. Rev. B44, 317 (1991)

    1991

  22. [22]

    Liu and E

    Z. Liu and E. Manousakis, Spectral function of a hole in the t-j model, Phys. Rev. B44, 2414 (1991)

    1991

  23. [23]

    Schmitt-Rink, C

    S. Schmitt-Rink, C. M. Varma, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Spectral function of holes in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2793 (1988)

    1988

  24. [24]

    K. K. Nielsen, M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, T. Pohl, and G. M. Bruun, Spatial structure of magnetic polarons in strongly interacting antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B104, 155136 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    N. G. Diamantis and E. Manousakis, Dynamics of string- like states of a hole in a quantum antiferromagnet: a diagrammatic monte carlo simulation, New Journal of Physics23, 123005 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    K. K. Nielsen, T. Pohl, and G. M. Bruun, Nonequilibrium hole dynamics in antiferromagnets: Damped strings and polarons, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 246601 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    J. H. Nyhegn, K. K. Nielsen, and G. M. Bruun, Probing a quantum spin liquid with equilibrium and nonequilibrium hole dynamics, Phys. Rev. B111, 035142 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    J. H. Nyhegn, K. K. Nielsen, L. Balents, and G. M. Bruun, Spin-charge bound states and emerging fermions in a quantum spin liquid (2025), arXiv:2507.02508 [cond- mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    J. H. Nyhegn, K. K. Nielsen, and G. M. Bruun, Equilib- rium and nonequilibrium dynamics of a hole in a bilayer antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B106, 155160 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    J. H. Nyhegn, G. M. Bruun, and K. K. Nielsen, Wave function and spatial structure of polarons in an antifer- romagnetic bilayer, Phys. Rev. B108, 075141 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Goryca, J

    M. Goryca, J. Li, A. V. Stier, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, E. Courtade, S. Shree, C. Robert, B. Urbaszek, X. Marie, and S. A. Crooker, Revealing exciton masses and dielectric properties of monolayer semiconductors with high magnetic fields, Nature Communications10, 4172 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    Zipfel, J

    J. Zipfel, J. Holler, A. A. Mitioglu, M. V. Ballottin, P. Nagler, A. V. Stier, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. A. Crooker, P. C. M. Christianen, T. Korn, and A. Chernikov, Spatial extent of the excited exciton states in ws2 monolayers from diamagnetic shifts, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075438 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    Paredes, G

    R. Paredes, G. Bruun, and A. Camacho-Guardian, In- teractions mediated by atoms, photons, electrons, and excitons, Phys. Rev. A110, 030101 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Semiconductor moir´ ematerials, Nature Nanotechnology17, 686 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    H. S. Adlong, E. Dizer, R. Schmidt, A. Imamoglu, and A. Christianen, Theory of exciton polarons in 2d wigner crystals (2025), arXiv:2512.XXXX [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2025

  36. [36]

    Zhang, L

    L. Zhang, L. Gu, H. S. Adlong, A. Christianen, E. Dizer, R. Ni, R. Ma, S. Park, H. Jang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, I. Esterlis, R. Schmidt, A. Imamoglu, and Y. Zhou, Wigner polarons reveal wigner crystal dynamics in a monolayer semiconductor, arXiv:2512.XXXX (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    L. Wang, F. Menzel, F. Pichler, P. Kn¨ uppel, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. Knap, and T. Smole´ nski, Spec- troscopy of wigner crystal polarons in an atomically thin semiconductor, arXiv:2512.XXXX (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    A. H. Reshak and S. Auluck, Calculated optical proper- ties of 2h−mos 2 intercalated with lithium, Phys. Rev. B 68, 125101 (2003)

    2003