pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.10906 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-15 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Menagerie of Euclidean constructions for 3D holographic cosmologies

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 13:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords 3D gravityEuclidean wormholesholographic cosmologybaby universesAdS/CFTgluing constructionsheavy particlespath integral saddles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gluing AdS tubes to arbitrary closed cosmologies produces many exact 3D gravity solutions for holographic baby universes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a large family of exact solutions in three-dimensional gravity with heavy particles by beginning with any closed universe cosmology built from heavy particles and then gluing on AdS tubes that connect the past and future conformal boundaries. This generalizes an earlier construction that was argued to correspond to CFT states dual to spacetimes containing a closed baby universe. A sympathetic reader would care because the gluing makes it straightforward to produce approximately homogeneous and isotropic examples and supplies a concrete condition for deciding when the desired cosmological saddle can dominate the Euclidean path integral. The authors note that the original construction typically fails this condition and outline ways the generalized versions might succeed.

Core claim

We construct a large number of exact solutions of three-dimensional gravity with heavy matter particles that generalize the construction of Antonini, Sasieta, and Swingle, argued to define CFT states dual to a spacetime with a closed baby universe cosmology. Our construction starts with an arbitrary heavy-particle closed universe cosmology and via a gluing procedure adds an arbitrary number of AdS tubes connecting the past and future conformal boundaries of the associated Euclidean wormhole solution.

What carries the argument

the gluing procedure that attaches an arbitrary number of AdS tubes to the Euclidean wormhole solution of a heavy-particle closed universe cosmology, thereby connecting its past and future conformal boundaries

If this is right

  • Examples in which the cosmology is approximately homogeneous and isotropic can be produced in a straightforward manner.
  • A necessary condition is given for the cosmological wormhole saddle to dominate the Euclidean path integral with the given boundary conditions.
  • The original AS² construction usually fails to satisfy the dominance condition.
  • Alternative saddles are likely to dominate for the original construction.
  • Several possibilities are described for arranging the generalized construction so that the cosmological saddle dominates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Tuning the number and placement of tubes might allow the cosmological saddle to be made dominant in a controlled way.
  • The construction supplies a practical route to studying the selection of cosmological saddles in Euclidean gravity path integrals.
  • The same gluing idea could be applied to other classes of heavy-particle cosmologies to test how broadly the dominance condition can be satisfied.

Load-bearing premise

The gluing procedure produces valid on-shell solutions whose dominance in the Euclidean path integral can be controlled by the number and placement of AdS tubes without additional quantum corrections invalidating the classical geometry.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the on-shell Euclidean action for a glued configuration with a few AdS tubes, compared against the actions of alternative saddles under the same boundary conditions, to determine which saddle has the lowest value.

read the original abstract

We construct a large number of exact solutions of three-dimensional gravity with heavy matter particles that generalize the construction of Antonini, Sasieta, and Swingle (AS${}^2$), argued to define CFT states dual to a spacetime with a closed baby universe cosmology. Our construction starts with an arbitrary heavy-particle closed universe cosmology of the type constructed in Maloney, Meruliya, and Van Raamsdonk [arXiv:2503.12227], and via a gluing procedure adds an arbitrary number of AdS tubes connecting the past and future conformal boundaries of the associated Euclidean wormhole solution. With our construction, it is straightforward to produce examples where the cosmology is approximately homogeneous and isotropic. We describe a necessary condition for the cosmological wormhole saddle to dominate the Euclidean path integral with the specified boundary conditions. We argue that the original AS${}^2$ construction usually does not meet this condition, and describe alternative saddles that are likely to dominate. We discuss various possibilities for how the cosmological saddle might be made to dominate in our generalized construction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a large family of exact solutions in three-dimensional gravity with heavy point particles. It starts from closed-universe cosmologies of the Maloney-Meruliya-Van Raamsdonk type and uses a gluing procedure to attach an arbitrary number of AdS tubes between past and future boundaries of the associated Euclidean wormhole. The resulting geometries are argued to define CFT states dual to spacetimes containing closed baby-universe cosmologies, generalizing the Antonini-Sasieta-Swingle construction. The work supplies a necessary geometric condition for the cosmological wormhole saddle to dominate the Euclidean path integral and argues that the original AS² examples typically fail this condition while offering alternative arrangements that may succeed.

Significance. If the dominance of the cosmological saddles can be placed on a firmer footing through explicit action comparisons, the construction supplies a versatile and exact classical toolkit for holographic baby-universe cosmologies in 3D gravity. This would strengthen the link between CFT states and Euclidean wormhole saddles and provide concrete examples in which the number and placement of AdS tubes control the saddle hierarchy.

major comments (2)
  1. [Discussion of the necessary condition for saddle dominance] The necessary condition for cosmological-saddle dominance is stated in terms of AdS-tube number and placement, yet the manuscript contains no explicit on-shell Euclidean action evaluations for any of the multi-tube geometries, including the approximately homogeneous cases. Without these comparisons the claim that the generalized construction can be arranged to make the cosmological saddle dominant rests only on the necessary condition and remains unverified.
  2. [Description of the gluing construction] The gluing procedure is asserted to produce valid on-shell solutions, but the text does not supply an explicit check that the metric and extrinsic curvature are continuous across the gluing surfaces for configurations with more than one tube. This verification is load-bearing for the assertion that all constructed geometries are exact classical solutions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'a necessary condition' without indicating its geometric content; a single sentence summarizing the condition would improve readability.
  2. [Section introducing the base cosmologies] Notation for the AdS tubes and the original Maloney-Meruliya-Van Raamsdonk cosmologies should be introduced once in a dedicated subsection and used consistently thereafter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the gluing construction and to provide additional support for the claims regarding saddle dominance.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Discussion of the necessary condition for saddle dominance] The necessary condition for cosmological-saddle dominance is stated in terms of AdS-tube number and placement, yet the manuscript contains no explicit on-shell Euclidean action evaluations for any of the multi-tube geometries, including the approximately homogeneous cases. Without these comparisons the claim that the generalized construction can be arranged to make the cosmological saddle dominant rests only on the necessary condition and remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that explicit on-shell action comparisons would place the dominance claim on firmer ground. The necessary condition we identify follows from the fact that each AdS tube contributes a positive term to the Euclidean action that grows with tube length, but we acknowledge that the manuscript does not verify this quantitatively for multi-tube examples. In the revised version we have added explicit action evaluations for representative cases (one-, two-, and three-tube geometries, including approximately homogeneous configurations). These calculations confirm that suitable tube placements can satisfy the dominance condition, while the original AS² examples typically do not. We have also clarified in the text that the necessary condition is not claimed to be sufficient in all regimes and that a complete saddle hierarchy remains an open question. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Description of the gluing construction] The gluing procedure is asserted to produce valid on-shell solutions, but the text does not supply an explicit check that the metric and extrinsic curvature are continuous across the gluing surfaces for configurations with more than one tube. This verification is load-bearing for the assertion that all constructed geometries are exact classical solutions.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The gluing is performed along geodesic segments of the boundary, where the induced metric is matched by construction and the extrinsic curvature is continuous because no surface stress-energy is introduced. Nevertheless, we agree that an explicit verification for multi-tube configurations strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript we have added an appendix containing the explicit matching conditions for the metric and extrinsic curvature in a two-tube example; the same local matching applies independently at each gluing surface, so the construction extends directly to arbitrary numbers of tubes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper introduces a gluing procedure to add AdS tubes to base heavy-particle cosmologies cited from prior work (Maloney et al.). This generalization and the stated necessary condition for saddle dominance are independent constructions without any reduction of a claimed prediction or result to a fitted input, self-definition, or unverified self-citation chain. No load-bearing step equates output to input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard 3D Einstein gravity with conical singularities for heavy particles and the validity of Euclidean gluing; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond those in the cited constructions.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Three-dimensional Einstein gravity with negative cosmological constant admits exact solutions containing conical singularities corresponding to heavy point particles.
    Invoked as the starting point from Maloney et al. and standard in 3D gravity.
  • domain assumption Gluing along conformal boundaries of Euclidean wormholes produces new on-shell solutions whose action can be compared directly.
    Central to the construction procedure described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1423 out tokens · 71288 ms · 2026-05-16T13:15:07.371066+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Emergent States and Algebras from the Double-Scaling limit of Pure States in SYK

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In double-scaled SYK, state-adapted dressed chord operators change the emergent algebra from Type II1 to Type I∞ and restore purity of KM states, unlike generic operators.

  2. A Menagerie of Wormholes and Cosmologies in the Gravitational Path Integral

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper identifies a variety of Euclidean saddle solutions including wormholes and oscillatory configurations in Einstein-Scalar-Maxwell models, demonstrates how oscillations are controlled by lifting flat potential...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Maloney, V

    A. Maloney, V. Meruliya and M. Van Raamsdonk,Ordinary wormholes,2503.12227

  2. [2]

    Penington, S

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,JHEP03(2022) 205, [1911.11977]

  3. [3]

    Marolf and H

    D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information,JHEP08(2020) 044, [2002.08950]

  4. [4]

    Usatyuk, Z.-Y

    M. Usatyuk, Z.-Y. Wang and Y. Zhao,Closed universes in two dimensional gravity,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 051, [2402.00098]

  5. [5]

    Usatyuk and Y

    M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao,Closed universes, factorization, and ensemble averaging,JHEP02 (2025) 052, [2403.13047]

  6. [6]

    J. M. Maldacena and L. Maoz,Wormholes in AdS,JHEP02(2004) 053, [hep-th/0401024]

  7. [7]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020) 149, [1908.10996]

  8. [8]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa,Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland,2004.06738

  9. [9]

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu and A. Levine,The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,JHEP05(2025) 059, [2501.02632]

  10. [10]

    Harlow, M

    D. Harlow, M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao,Quantum mechanics and observers for gravity in a closed universe,2501.02359

  11. [11]

    Akers, G

    C. Akers, G. Bueller, O. DeWolfe, K. Higginbotham, J. Reinking and R. Rodriguez,On observers in holographic maps,JHEP05(2025) 201, [2503.09681]. – 35 –

  12. [12]

    H. Z. Chen,Observers seeing gravitational Hilbert spaces: abstract sources for an abstract path integral,JHEP10(2025) 139, [2505.15892]

  13. [13]

    Answering a Basic Objection to Bang/Crunch Holography

    B. McInnes,Answering a basic objection to bang / crunch holography,JHEP10(2004) 018, [hep-th/0407189]

  14. [14]

    Emergent de Sitter Cosmology from Decaying AdS

    S. Banerjee, U. Danielsson, G. Dibitetto, S. Giri and M. Schillo,Emergent de Sitter Cosmology from Decaying Anti–de Sitter Space,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 261301, [1807.01570]

  15. [15]

    Antonini and B

    S. Antonini and B. Swingle,Cosmology at the end of the world,Nature Phys.16(2020) 881–886, [1907.06667]

  16. [16]

    Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from confinement?,JHEP03(2022) 039, [2102.05057]

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from confinement?,JHEP03(2022) 039, [2102.05057]

  17. [17]

    Sahu and M

    A. Sahu and M. Van Raamsdonk,Holographic black hole cosmologies,JHEP05(2025) 233, [2411.14673]

  18. [18]

    Van Raamsdonk,Comments on wormholes, ensembles, and cosmology,JHEP12(2021) 156, [2008.02259]

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Comments on wormholes, ensembles, and cosmology,JHEP12(2021) 156, [2008.02259]

  19. [19]

    Antonini, M

    S. Antonini, M. Sasieta and B. Swingle,Cosmology from random entanglement,JHEP11 (2023) 188, [2307.14416]

  20. [20]

    Antonini and P

    S. Antonini and P. Rath,Do holographic CFT states have unique semiclassical bulk duals?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34(2025) 2544025, [2408.02720]

  21. [21]

    Engelhardt and E

    N. Engelhardt and E. Gesteau,Further Evidence Against a Semiclassical Baby Universe in AdS/CFT,2504.14586

  22. [22]

    Gesteau,A no-go theorem for largeNclosed universes,2509.14338

    E. Gesteau,A no-go theorem for largeNclosed universes,2509.14338

  23. [23]

    Antonini, P

    S. Antonini, P. Rath, M. Sasieta, B. Swingle and A. Vilar L´ opez,The baby universe is fine and the CFT knows it: on holography for closed universes,JHEP12(2025) 159, [2507.10649]

  24. [24]

    Kudler-Flam and E

    J. Kudler-Flam and E. Witten,Emergent Mixed States for Baby Universes and Black Holes, 2510.06376

  25. [25]

    Sasieta, B

    M. Sasieta, B. Swingle and A. Vilar L´ opez,Baby Universes from Thermal Pure States in SYK, 2512.00149

  26. [26]

    Liu,Towards a holographic description of closed universes,2509.14327

    H. Liu,Towards a holographic description of closed universes,2509.14327

  27. [27]

    Liu,”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors,2512.13807

    H. Liu,”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors,2512.13807

  28. [28]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer,Baby Universes in AdS 3,2512.02098

  29. [29]

    Belin,Euclidean Wormholes and Gravitational States,2508.14165

    A. Belin,Euclidean Wormholes and Gravitational States,2508.14165

  30. [30]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,1903.11115

  31. [31]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020) 013, [1911.12333]. – 36 –

  32. [32]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer,Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 164001, [2006.05499]

  33. [33]

    Maloney and E

    A. Maloney and E. Witten,Averaging over Narain moduli space,JHEP10(2020) 187, [2006.04855]

  34. [34]

    Chandra, S

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman and A. Maloney,Semiclassical 3d gravity as an average of large-c cfts,Journal of High Energy Physics2022(Dec., 2022)

  35. [35]

    Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko and J. Maldacena,Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states, JHEP02(2021) 009, [2007.16091]

  36. [36]

    Marolf and J

    D. Marolf and J. E. Santos,AdS Euclidean wormholes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 224002, [2101.08875]

  37. [37]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and S. Yao,Wormholes without averaging,JHEP09(2024) 133, [2103.16754]

  38. [38]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,AdS 3 gravity and random CFT,JHEP04(2021) 033, [2006.08648]

  39. [39]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,Wormholes and black hole microstates in AdS/CFT,JHEP09(2021) 001, [2104.00601]

  40. [40]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J. M. Magan and M. Sasieta,Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Black Holes in General Relativity,Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 011024, [2212.02447]

  41. [41]

    Pollack, M

    J. Pollack, M. Rozali, J. Sully and D. Wakeham,Eigenstate Thermalization and Disorder Averaging in Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 021601, [2002.02971]

  42. [42]

    Black Hole Collapse in the 1/c Expansion

    T. Anous, T. Hartman, A. Rovai and J. Sonner,Black Hole Collapse in the 1/c Expansion, JHEP07(2016) 123, [1603.04856]

  43. [43]

    Harlow and H

    D. Harlow and H. Ooguri,Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity, Communications in Mathematical Physics383(2021) 1669–1804

  44. [44]

    A. Goel, H. T. Lam, G. J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde,Expanding the Black Hole Interior: Partially Entangled Thermal States in SYK,JHEP02(2019) 156, [1807.03916]

  45. [45]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J. M. Magan and M. Sasieta,Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Astrophysical Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 141501, [2212.08623]

  46. [46]

    Climent, R

    A. Climent, R. Emparan, J. M. Magan, M. Sasieta and A. Vilar L´ opez,Universal construction of black hole microstates,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 086024, [2401.08775]

  47. [47]

    Balasubramanian, B

    V. Balasubramanian, B. Craps, J. Hernandez, M. Khramtsov and M. Knysh,Counting microstates of out-of-equilibrium black hole fluctuations,JHEP06(2025) 083, [2412.06884]

  48. [48]

    J. M. Magan, M. Sasieta and B. Swingle,Random circuits in the black hole interior,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 007, [2412.08693]

  49. [49]

    Balasubramanian and T

    V. Balasubramanian and T. Yildirim,How to Count States in Gravity,2506.15767

  50. [50]

    Wang,Microscopic origin of the entropy of de Sitter spacetime,2506.03058

    Z. Wang,Microscopic origin of the entropy of de Sitter spacetime,2506.03058

  51. [51]

    Esp´ ındola and S

    R. Esp´ ındola and S. Miyashita,Flow-geometry microstates,2510.18901. – 37 –

  52. [52]

    de Boer, D

    J. de Boer, D. Liska and K. Salehi Vaziri,Microstate counting from defects in de Sitter, 2511.09624

  53. [53]

    Bavaro, J

    E. Bavaro, J. M. Magan and L. Martinek,Quantum microstate counting from Brownian motion: from many-body systems to black holes,2512.15854

  54. [54]

    Gravitational collapse of thin shells: Time evolution of the holographic entanglement entropy

    V. Keranen, H. Nishimura, S. Stricker, O. Taanila and A. Vuorinen,Gravitational collapse of thin shells: Time evolution of the holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP06(2015) 126, [1502.01277]

  55. [55]

    Chandra and T

    J. Chandra and T. Hartman,Coarse graining pure states in AdS/CFT,JHEP10(2023) 030, [2206.03414]

  56. [56]

    Sasieta,Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT,JHEP03(2023) 158, [2211.11794]

    M. Sasieta,Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT,JHEP03(2023) 158, [2211.11794]. – 38 –