arxiv: 2601.21155 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-29 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat· nucl-ex· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Nucleon axial-vector form factor and radius from radiatively-corrected antineutrino scattering data

Oleksandr Tomalak , Aaron S. Meyer , Clarence Wret , Tejin Cai , Richard J. Hill , Kevin S. McFarland

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 10:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-exnucl-th

keywords axial-vector form factorradiative correctionsMINERvAantineutrino scatteringnucleon axial radiuslattice QCDweak interaction

0 comments

The pith

Applying radiative corrections to MINERvA antineutrino-hydrogen data extracts the nucleon axial-vector form factor G_A and its radius.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to fold radiative corrections into the analysis of recent MINERvA antineutrino scattering off hydrogen targets to determine the nucleon's axial-vector form factor. G_A sets the strength of the axial weak current between lepton and nucleon and controls rates for elastic neutrino scattering and muon capture. Prior extractions left large uncertainty in the momentum dependence of G_A because QED effects were not fully accounted for, blocking clean tests against lattice QCD. A reader cares because a better G_A directly tightens predictions for neutrino oscillation experiments and low-energy electroweak observables.

Core claim

After applying radiative corrections to the MINERvA antineutrino-hydrogen data set, the authors extract G_A(Q^2) and the associated axial radius, quantify how the size of these corrections compares with other experimental uncertainties, and discuss the resulting consistency with lattice QCD evaluations.

What carries the argument

Radiative corrections to the differential cross section for charged-current antineutrino-proton scattering that include virtual-photon and real-photon emission contributions before fitting the axial form factor G_A to the corrected data.

If this is right

The uncertainty on the extracted G_A is now limited by data statistics rather than unaccounted electromagnetic effects.
Direct numerical comparison between the experimental G_A and lattice QCD results becomes possible with controlled theoretical errors.
The same correction procedure can be applied to future higher-statistics neutrino-hydrogen measurements to reach smaller uncertainties on the axial radius.
The momentum dependence of G_A obtained this way improves predictions for the differential cross sections used in neutrino-nucleus modeling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same radiative-correction framework could be applied retroactively to older bubble-chamber neutrino data to test whether prior radius values change.
A persistent mismatch between the corrected MINERvA radius and lattice results would indicate either missing higher-order QED terms or deficiencies in the lattice simulations of the axial current.
Improved knowledge of G_A propagates directly into more precise theoretical rates for muon capture on the proton.

Load-bearing premise

The radiative corrections can be calculated to an accuracy whose uncertainty remains smaller than the statistical precision of the MINERvA data.

What would settle it

An independent higher-order calculation of the radiative corrections that shifts the extracted axial radius outside the uncertainty band reported from the MINERvA fit would falsify the current extraction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.21155 by Aaron S. Meyer, Clarence Wret, Kevin S. McFarland, Oleksandr Tomalak, Richard J. Hill, Tejin Cai.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The ratio of the cross section after accounting for the radiative corrections relative the leading [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: MINERvA muon antineutrino-hydrogen charged-current quasielastic data are compared to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The nucleon axial-vector form factor GA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Antineutrino-hydrogen charged-current elastic cross-section data from MINERvA [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The nucleon axial-vector form factor GA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: L curves with χ 2 penalty on the y axis and χ 2 data on the x axis for the fits to the MINERvA hydrogen data with kmax = 5, 6, 7, and 8 are presented for the value of the parameter t0 = 0, −0.28, −0.5, −0.75, −1 GeV2 , as it is indicated on figures. Curves represent the dependence on the parameter λ, cf. Eq. (14), which corresponds to a relative weight between χ 2 penalty and χ 2 data in the total χ 2 . k… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The nucleon axial-vector form factor, $G_A$, is critical to determine the electroweak interactions of leptons with nucleons. Important examples of processes influenced by $G_A$ are elastic (anti)neutrino-nucleon scattering and muon capture by the proton. Sparse experimental data results in a large uncertainty on the momentum dependence of $G_A$ and has motivated the consideration of new experimental probes and first-principles lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD) evaluations. The comparison of new and precise theoretical predictions for $G_A$ with future experimental data necessitates the application of radiative corrections to experimentally-observable processes. We apply these corrections in the extraction of $G_A$ and the associated axial-vector radius from the recent MINERvA antineutrino-hydrogen data, compare the effects from radiative corrections to other uncertainties in neutrino scattering experiments, and discuss the comparison of lattice QCD evaluations to experimental measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Tomalak et al. give a new extraction of the axial radius from MINERvA antineutrino-hydrogen data after applying radiative corrections, which is a straightforward incremental update but needs a clear error budget on those corrections.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper takes the recent MINERvA antineutrino-hydrogen dataset and applies radiative corrections to extract G_A(Q^2) and the axial radius. Previous work on the same data skipped those QED effects, so the new number supplies a cleaner experimental anchor for lattice QCD comparisons and neutrino modeling. The authors use established correction methods and note that the size of the corrections is comparable to other uncertainties in the field. That part is useful and directly addresses a practical need for better precision on the form factor slope at low Q^2. They also keep the discussion focused on how the updated result sits next to lattice evaluations, which makes the paper easy to use as a reference point. The approach is standard data fitting with explicit checks against the experimental errors, and nothing in the abstract suggests hidden fitting tricks or circular definitions of the radius. The soft spot is the treatment of uncertainties coming from the radiative corrections themselves. The radius is sensitive to the Q^2 dependence near zero, so any unaccounted model dependence in the virtual-photon or bremsstrahlung pieces could shift the central value or inflate the error. The abstract says the corrections are compared to other uncertainties, but a full propagation that includes hadronic-structure variations in the corrections would be needed to confirm they stay sub-dominant after the fit. If that breakdown is only sketched rather than tabulated with all sources, the result is less robust than it first appears. This is the sort of paper that people building neutrino event generators or running lattice calculations on nucleon structure will want to cite for the updated number. It is not a first-principles advance, but it tightens an important experimental input. A serious referee should see it, mainly to verify the correction error budget and check that the fit choices are documented without post-selection. I would send it to peer review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper applies QED radiative corrections to recent MINERvA antineutrino-hydrogen scattering data to extract the nucleon axial-vector form factor G_A(Q^2) and the associated axial radius, compares the size of these corrections to other experimental uncertainties, and discusses consistency with lattice QCD evaluations.

Significance. If the corrections are shown to be computed with uncertainties sub-dominant to the data, this provides a useful updated experimental anchor for G_A and the axial radius that can be directly compared to lattice QCD results and used to reduce theory errors in neutrino scattering and muon capture processes.

major comments (1)

The load-bearing step is the claim that radiative corrections can be applied without introducing uncertainties comparable to or larger than MINERvA statistical precision after propagation to the axial radius (obtained from the Q^2=0 slope of G_A). The abstract states that effects are compared to other uncertainties, but no explicit error budget is supplied that quantifies hadronic-structure dependence in the corrections or demonstrates the propagated uncertainty remains smaller than the data errors.

minor comments (2)

Ensure all figures distinguish corrected and uncorrected cross sections with clear error bars and labels.
Add a short table summarizing the extracted radius with and without radiative corrections for direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will revise the paper to incorporate an explicit error budget as requested.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The load-bearing step is the claim that radiative corrections can be applied without introducing uncertainties comparable to or larger than MINERvA statistical precision after propagation to the axial radius (obtained from the Q^2=0 slope of G_A). The abstract states that effects are compared to other uncertainties, but no explicit error budget is supplied that quantifies hadronic-structure dependence in the corrections or demonstrates the propagated uncertainty remains smaller than the data errors.

Authors: We agree that an explicit error budget focused on hadronic-structure dependence would strengthen the presentation and make the comparison to MINERvA precision more transparent. While the current manuscript already compares the overall size of the radiative corrections to other experimental uncertainties (see Section 4 and Figure 3), it does not isolate the hadronic inputs in a dedicated budget. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection that varies the nucleon structure inputs entering the radiative corrections (different G_A and G_E/G_M parametrizations, parton distributions, and resonance contributions) and propagates these variations through to the extracted axial radius. The resulting uncertainty will be shown to remain smaller than the MINERvA statistical precision on the radius, with the full breakdown presented in a table for direct comparison to the data errors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in G_A extraction from MINERvA data

full rationale

The paper performs a standard data-driven fit of the axial form factor G_A(Q^2) to radiatively corrected MINERvA antineutrino-hydrogen differential cross sections, then extracts the axial radius from the slope at Q^2=0. This extraction is benchmarked against independent lattice QCD results and does not reduce to any self-definition, fitted-input-as-prediction, or self-citation chain. Radiative corrections are applied from prior calculations but remain an external input whose uncertainties are compared (not defined) against the data errors. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external experimental and theoretical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The extraction rests on the standard parametrization of the axial form factor (typically a dipole form with one free radius parameter) and on the validity of QED radiative corrections computed in the electroweak theory. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)

axial radius parameter
The momentum dependence of G_A is parametrized by a single radius that is fitted to the corrected data.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Radiative corrections to neutrino-nucleon scattering are accurately described by standard QED calculations within the electroweak Standard Model.
Invoked when the authors state they apply these corrections to the observable cross sections.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1216 out tokens · 27836 ms · 2026-05-16T10:17:46.081354+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We apply these corrections in the extraction of G_A and the associated axial-vector radius from the recent MINERvA antineutrino-hydrogen data... z-expansion parameterization
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the nucleon axial-vector form factor G_A(Q²) = sum a_k z(Q²)^k ... with t_cut = 9 m_π²

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

QED radiative corrections in inverse beta decay from virtual pions
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Pion-induced QED radiative corrections in inverse beta decay are small, at or below nucleon form factor uncertainties, enabling sub-permille theoretical precision for charged-current neutrino-nucleon scattering above 10 MeV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 122 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 34 internal anchors

[1]

W. A. Mann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.31, 844 (1973)

work page 1973
[2]

S. J. Barish et al., Phys. Rev. D16, 3103 (1977)

work page 1977
[3]

K. L. Miller et al., Phys. Rev. D26, 537 (1982)

work page 1982
[4]

Bonetti, G

S. Bonetti, G. Carnesecchi, D. Cavalli, P. Negri, A. Pullia, M. Rollier, F. Romano, and R. Schira, Nuovo Cim. A38, 260 (1977)

work page 1977
[5]

N. J. Baker, A. M. Cnops, P. L. Connolly, S. A. Kahn, H. G. Kirk, M. J. Murtagh, R. B. Palmer, N. P. Samios, and M. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D23, 2499 (1981)

work page 1981
[6]

Kitagaki et al., Phys

T. Kitagaki et al., Phys. Rev. D42, 1331 (1990)

work page 1990
[7]

Kitagaki et al., Phys

T. Kitagaki et al., Phys. Rev. D28, 436 (1983)

work page 1983
[8]

Allasia et al., Nucl

D. Allasia et al., Nucl. Phys. B343, 285 (1990)

work page 1990
[9]

Cai et al

T. Cai et al. (MINERvA), Nature614, 48 (2023)

work page 2023
[10]

Amaldi, B

E. Amaldi, B. Borgia, P. Pistilli, M. Balla, G. V. Di Giorgio, A. Giazotto, S. Serbassi, and G. Stop- pini, Nuovo Cim. A65, 377 (1970)

work page 1970
[11]

Amaldi, M

E. Amaldi, M. Benevantano, B. Borgia, F. De Notaristefani, A. Frondaroli, P. Pistilli, I. Sestili, and M. Severi, Phys. Lett. B41, 216 (1972)

work page 1972
[12]

E. D. Bloom, R. L. Cottrell, H. C. DeStaebler, C. L. Jordan, H. Piel, C. Y. Prescott, R. Siemann, S. Stein, and R. E. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1186 (1973)

work page 1973
[13]

Brauel et al., Phys

P. Brauel et al., Phys. Lett. B45, 389 (1973)

work page 1973
[14]

Joos et al., Phys

P. Joos et al., Phys. Lett. B62, 230 (1976)

work page 1976
[15]

Del Guerra, A

A. Del Guerra, A. Giazotto, M. A. Giorgi, A. Stefanini, D. R. Botterill, D. W. Braben, D. Clarke, and P. R. Norton, Nucl. Phys. B99, 253 (1975)

work page 1975
[16]

Del Guerra, A

A. Del Guerra, A. Giazotto, M. A. Giorgi, A. Stefanini, D. R. Botterill, H. E. Montgomery, P. R. Norton, and G. Matone, Nucl. Phys. B107, 65 (1976). 16

work page 1976
[17]

A. S. Esaulov, A. M. Pilipenko, and Y. I. Titov, Nucl. Phys. B136, 511 (1978)

work page 1978
[18]

Choi et al., Phys

S. Choi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3927 (1993)

work page 1993
[19]

A measurement of the axial form factor of the nucleon by the p(e,e'pi+)n reaction at W=1125 MeV

A. Liesenfeld et al. (A1), Phys. Lett. B468, 20 (1999), arXiv:nucl-ex/9911003

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[20]

Measurement of the $p(e,e'\pi^+)n$ reaction close to threshold and at low $Q^2$

I. Friˇ sˇ ci´ cet al. (A1), Phys. Lett. B766, 301 (2017), arXiv:1606.00970 [nucl-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[21]

A. S. Meyer, M. Betancourt, R. Gran, and R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D93, 113015 (2016), arXiv:1603.03048 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[22]

Tomalak, R

O. Tomalak, R. Gupta, and T. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. D108, 074514 (2023), arXiv:2307.14920 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2023
[23]

Tomalak, M

O. Tomalak, M. Betancourt, K. Borah, R. J. Hill, and T. Junk, Phys. Lett. B854, 138718 (2024), arXiv:2402.14115 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

A. S. Meyer et al., (2025), arXiv:2512.14097 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Djukanovic, G

D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, J. Koponen, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, T. Schulz, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D106, 074503 (2022), arXiv:2207.03440 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

G. S. Bali, L. Barca, S. Collins, M. Gruber, M. L¨ offler, A. Sch¨ afer, W. S¨ oldner, P. Wein, S. Weish¨ aupl, and T. Wurm (RQCD), JHEP05, 126 (2020), arXiv:1911.13150 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2020
[27]

S. Park, R. Gupta, B. Yoon, S. Mondal, T. Bhattacharya, Y.-C. Jang, B. Jo´ o, and F. Winter (Nucleon Matrix Elements (NME)), Phys. Rev. D105, 054505 (2022), arXiv:2103.05599 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

Alexandrou et al., Phys

C. Alexandrou et al., Phys. Rev. D103, 034509 (2021), arXiv:2011.13342 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2021
[29]

Y.-C. Jang, R. Gupta, T. Bhattacharya, B. Yoon, and H.-W. Lin (Precision Neutron Decay Matrix Elements (PNDME)), Phys. Rev. D109, 014503 (2024), arXiv:2305.11330 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

A. S. Meyer, (2026), arXiv:2601.02676 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2026
[31]

Petti, R

R. Petti, R. J. Hill, and O. Tomalak, Phys. Rev. D109, L051301 (2024), arXiv:2309.02509 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

Physics Potential of a Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Using J-PARC Neutrino Beam and Hyper-Kamiokande

K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Proto-), PTEP2015, 053C02 (2015), arXiv:1502.05199 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[33]

Abi et al

B. Abi et al. (DUNE), Eur. Phys. J. C80, 978 (2020), arXiv:2006.16043 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

Tomalak, Q

O. Tomalak, Q. Chen, R. J. Hill, and K. S. McFarland, Nature Commun.13, 5286 (2022), arXiv:2105.07939 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[35]

Tomalak, Q

O. Tomalak, Q. Chen, R. J. Hill, K. S. McFarland, and C. Wret, Phys. Rev. D106, 093006 (2022), arXiv:2204.11379 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[36]

Tomalak, Phys

O. Tomalak, Phys. Lett. B873, 140199 (2026), arXiv:2509.24011 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[37]

J. C. Bernauer et al. (A1), Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 242001 (2010), arXiv:1007.5076 [nucl-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[38]

J. C. Bernauer et al. (A1), Phys. Rev. C90, 015206 (2014), arXiv:1307.6227 [nucl-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[39]

Borah, R

K. Borah, R. J. Hill, G. Lee, and O. Tomalak, Phys. Rev. D102, 074012 (2020), arXiv:2003.13640 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[40]

Borah, M

K. Borah, M. Betancourt, R. J. Hill, T. Junk, and O. Tomalak, Phys. Rev. D110, 013004 (2024), arXiv:2403.04687 [hep-ph]. 17

work page arXiv 2024
[41]

R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D95, 013001 (2017), arXiv:1605.02613 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[42]

M. A. P. Brown et al. (UCNA), Phys. Rev. C97, 035505 (2018), arXiv:1712.00884 [nucl-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[43]

Measurement of the Weak Axial-Vector Coupling Constant in the Decay of Free Neutrons Using a Pulsed Cold Neutron Beam

B. M¨ arkischet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 242501 (2019), arXiv:1812.04666 [nucl-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[44]

Exotic decay channels are not the cause of the neutron lifetime anomaly

D. Dubbers, H. Saul, B. M¨ arkisch, T. Soldner, and H. Abele, Phys. Lett. B791, 6 (2019), arXiv:1812.00626 [nucl-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[45]

G. S. Bali, S. Collins, S. Heybrock, M. L¨ offler, R. R¨ odl, W. S¨ oldner, and S. Weish¨ aupl (RQCD), Phys. Rev. D108, 034512 (2023), arXiv:2305.04717 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2023
[46]

Tsuji, N

R. Tsuji, N. Tsukamoto, Y. Aoki, K.-I. Ishikawa, Y. Kuramashi, S. Sasaki, E. Shintani, and T. Yamazaki (PACS), Phys. Rev. D106, 094505 (2022), arXiv:2207.11914 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2022
[47]

Cirigliano, J

V. Cirigliano, J. de Vries, L. Hayen, E. Mereghetti, and A. Walker-Loud, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 121801 (2022), arXiv:2202.10439 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[48]

Cirigliano, W

V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, E. Mereghetti, and O. Tomalak, Phys. Rev. D108, 053003 (2023), arXiv:2306.03138 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[49]

Cirigliano, W

V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, E. Mereghetti, and O. Tomalak, Phys. Rev. D111, 053005 (2025), arXiv:2410.21404 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

Z. Cao, R. J. Hill, R. Plestid, and P. Vander Griend, Phys. Rev. D112, 113006 (2025)

work page 2025
[51]

R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), PTEP2022, 083C01 (2022)

work page 2022
[52]

K. A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014)

work page 2014
[53]

R. J. Hill and G. Paz, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 160402 (2011), arXiv:1103.4617 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[54]

Model independent determination of the axial mass parameter in quasielastic neutrino-nucleon scattering

B. Bhattacharya, R. J. Hill, and G. Paz, Phys. Rev. D84, 073006 (2011), arXiv:1108.0423 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[55]

Lepage and S

G. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D22, 2157 (1980)

work page 1980
[56]

V. L. Chernyak and A. R. Zhitnitsky, Phys. Rept.112, 173 (1984)

work page 1984
[57]

Comment on form factor shape and extraction of |V_ub| from B --> pi l nu

T. Becher and R. J. Hill, Phys. Lett. B633, 61 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0509090

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[58]

G. Lee, J. R. Arrington, and R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev.D92, 013013 (2015), arXiv:1505.01489 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[59]

Vector and Axial Nucleon Form Factors:A Duality Constrained Parameterization

A. Bodek, S. Avvakumov, R. Bradford, and H. S. Budd, Eur. Phys. J. C53, 349 (2008), arXiv:0708.1946 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[60]

A new parameterization of the nucleon elastic form factors

R. Bradford, A. Bodek, H. S. Budd, and J. Arrington, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.159, 127 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0602017

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[61]

Extraction of the Axial Nucleon Form Factor from Neutrino Experiments on Deuterium

A. Bodek, S. Avvakumov, R. Bradford, and H. S. Budd, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.110, 082004 (2008), arXiv:0709.3538 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[62]

Acciarri et al

R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE), (2015), arXiv:1512.06148 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2015
[63]

Abi et al

B. Abi et al. (DUNE), (2020), arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[64]

Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report

K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande), (2018), arXiv:1805.04163 [physics.ins-det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[65]

Zazueta et al

L. Zazueta et al. (MINERvA), Phys. Rev. D107, 012001 (2023), arXiv:2209.05540 [hep-ex]. 18

work page arXiv 2023
[66]

H. W. Wachsmuth, Neutrino and muon fluxes in the CERN 400 GeV proton beam dump experiments, Tech. Rep. (CERN, Geneva, 1979)

work page 1979
[67]

Alvarez-Ruso et al., (2022), arXiv:2203.11298 [hep-ex]

L. Alvarez-Ruso et al., (2022), arXiv:2203.11298 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[68]

A Precise Determination of (Anti)neutrino Fluxes with (Anti)neutrino-Hydrogen Interactions

H. Duyang, B. Guo, S. R. Mishra, and R. Petti, Phys. Lett. B795, 424 (2019), arXiv:1902.09480 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[69]

Poppi (DUNE), Nuovo Cim

F. Poppi (DUNE), Nuovo Cim. C46, 101 (2023)

work page 2023
[70]

Probing Novel Scalar and Tensor Interactions from (Ultra)Cold Neutrons to the LHC

T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, S. D. Cohen, A. Filipuzzi, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, M. L. Graesser, R. Gupta, and H.-W. Lin, Phys. Rev. D85, 054512 (2012), arXiv:1110.6448 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[71]

Nucleon-pion-state contribution in lattice calculations of the nucleon charges $g_A,g_T$ and $g_S$

O. B¨ ar, Phys. Rev. D94, 054505 (2016), arXiv:1606.09385 [hep-lat]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[72]

Chiral perturbation theory and nucleon-pion-state contaminations in lattice QCD

O. Bar, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32, 1730011 (2017), arXiv:1705.02806 [hep-lat]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[73]

$N\pi$-state contamination in lattice calculations of the nucleon axial form factors

O. Bar, Phys. Rev. D99, 054506 (2019), arXiv:1812.09191 [hep-lat]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[74]

C. C. Chang et al., Nature558, 91 (2018), arXiv:1805.12130 [hep-lat]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[75]

Isovector Charges of the Nucleon from 2+1+1-flavor Lattice QCD

R. Gupta, Y.-C. Jang, B. Yoon, H.-W. Lin, V. Cirigliano, and T. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. D98, 034503 (2018), arXiv:1806.09006 [hep-lat]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[76]

He et al., Phys

J. He et al., Phys. Rev. C105, 065203 (2022), arXiv:2104.05226 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2022
[77]

Aoki et al

Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), Eur. Phys. J. C82, 869 (2022), arXiv:2111.09849 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2022
[78]

Y.-C. Jang, R. Gupta, B. Yoon, and T. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 072002 (2020), arXiv:1905.06470 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2020
[79]

Alexandrou, S

C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, J. Finkenrath, R. Frezzotti, B. Kostrzewa, G. Kout- sou, G. Spanoudes, and C. Urbach (Extended Twisted Mass), Phys. Rev. D109, 034503 (2024), arXiv:2309.05774 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2024
[80]

C.-Y. Seng, M. Gorchtein, H. H. Patel, and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 241804 (2018), arXiv:1807.10197 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.