Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

How Far Ahead Do LLMs Plan? Uncovering the Latent Horizon in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2602.02103 v2 pith:6HOZ4TCO submitted 2026-02-02 cs.LG cs.CL

How Far Ahead Do LLMs Plan? Uncovering the Latent Horizon in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

classification cs.LG cs.CL
keywords reasoningllmsstateschain-of-thoughthiddenhorizonlatentmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has become a central mechanism for eliciting multi-step reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs). Yet recent evidence presents a tension: hidden states appear to already encode future reasoning before CoT fully unfolds, while explicit steps still remain crucial for tasks requiring compositional computation. To deepen the understanding between LLM's internal states and its verbalized reasoning trajectories, we investigate the latent planning strength of LLMs, through our probing method, Tele-Lens, applying to hidden states across diverse task domains. Our empirical results indicate that LLMs exhibit a myopic horizon, primarily conducting incremental transitions without precise global planning. Leveraging this characteristic, we propose a hypothesis on enhancing uncertainty estimation of CoT, which we validate that a sparse set of pivot positions can effectively represent the uncertainty of the entire path. We further underscore the significance of exploiting CoT dynamics, and demonstrate that automatic recognition of CoT bypass can be achieved without performance degradation. Our code, data and models are released at https://github.com/lxucs/tele-lens.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TypeGo: An OS Runtime for Embodied Agents

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    An OS-style multi-cadence runtime for LLM-driven robots hides planning latency and schedules concurrent tasks, cutting TTFA by 73% and per-step delay by 50% on a Go2 prototype suite.

  2. HypEHR: Hyperbolic Modeling of Electronic Health Records for Efficient Question Answering

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HypEHR is a hyperbolic embedding model for EHR data that uses Lorentzian geometry and hierarchy-aware pretraining to answer clinical questions nearly as well as large language models but with much smaller size.

  3. The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook

    cs.AI 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

    A large survey organizes latent-space work in language-based models by foundation, evolution, four mechanisms, seven abilities, and open challenges.