pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.02344 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-02 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph· quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Large Nc Truncations for SU(Nc) Lattice Yang-Mills Theory with Fermions

Neel S. Modi , Anthony N. Ciavarella , Jad C. Halimeh , Christian W. Bauer
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 08:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-phquant-ph
keywords lattice QCDtruncationquantum simulationstaggered fermionslarge Ncstring breakingconfinementYang-Mills theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

A truncation with Krylov basis, energy limits, fermion caps and large-Nc scaling yields finite-state Hamiltonians for lattice QCD with staggered fermions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors construct a truncation for SU(Nc) lattice Yang-Mills theory coupled to staggered fermions so that the Hilbert space remains finite and therefore simulable on quantum hardware. The scheme combines four elements: a local Krylov procedure that builds only allowed basis states, an upper bound on electric energy per link, a cap on fermion number per site, and a large-Nc scaling rule for the Hamiltonian matrix elements. Explicit truncated Hamiltonians are written down for one- and two-dimensional lattices. Numerical evolution of string-breaking dynamics is performed inside the truncated space to illustrate that the scheme can capture the process.

Core claim

We introduce a truncation of lattice QCD coupled to staggered fermions that includes (i) a local Krylov truncation that generates allowed basis states; (ii) a maximum allowed electric energy per link; (iii) a limit on the number of fermions per site; and (iv) a truncation in the large Nc scaling of Hamiltonian matrix elements. Explicit truncated Hamiltonians for 1+1D and 2+1D lattices are given, and numerical simulations of string-breaking dynamics are performed.

What carries the argument

The four-part truncation (local Krylov basis generation plus electric-energy cutoff plus fermion-number limit plus large-Nc matrix-element scaling) that produces a finite-dimensional Hamiltonian while retaining confinement and string-breaking dynamics.

If this is right

  • String-breaking dynamics can be evolved on quantum hardware in one and two spatial dimensions.
  • The same truncation pattern can be applied to any fixed Nc once the large-Nc scaling rule is fixed.
  • Matrix elements remain computable in closed form because only a finite number of basis states are retained per link.
  • Confinement signatures such as the linear potential between static charges remain visible inside the truncated space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cutoff pattern could be tested in three spatial dimensions by increasing the local Krylov depth and checking whether the string tension converges.
  • Observables sensitive to the full gauge group, such as the plaquette expectation value, could serve as additional validation benchmarks beyond string breaking.
  • Because the truncation is local, it may combine with existing tensor-network or variational methods that already work on small lattices.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen cutoffs and large-Nc scaling preserve the essential non-perturbative dynamics of the full SU(Nc) theory, including string breaking and confinement, without introducing uncontrolled errors.

What would settle it

A direct comparison showing that the time scale or probability of string breaking in the truncated model differs by more than a stated tolerance from the corresponding quantity in the untruncated theory on the same lattice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.02344 by Anthony N. Ciavarella, Christian W. Bauer, Jad C. Halimeh, Neel S. Modi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example data that participates in the Kogut-Susskind [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example polyhex tile that can be used to generate the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of double-vertex cuts associated with a generic hopping transition at arbitrary link [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Transition allowed at T1: |1, 1, 1⟩ → |1, N, 1⟩. Reading off from Table III, this interaction has matrix element √ Nc. In other words, truncation T1provides the leading order contribution to the energy cutoff (ne, nf ) = (1, 1) in the large Nc expansion. Based on this informa￾tion, any gauge-invariant basis state on a lattice with L links is summarized by a sequence of L irreps, each chosen to be 1 or N, s… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: New transition at T2: |N, 1, N⟩ → [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: New transitions at truncation T3’. Left: |N, 1, 1⟩ → |N, N, 1⟩. Middle: |1, 1, N⟩ → |1, N, N⟩. Right: |N, 1, N⟩ → |N, N, N⟩. adding the sub-leading interactions from truncation T2. We have to be careful when simplifying the result, how￾ever, because P 1 +P N evaluates to I −P N at truncation T3, instead of simply I as in truncation T ′ 3 . The simplest way to make this adjustment is by writing Hint T3 = √ … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: New transitions available only at T5 (and higher truncations). Left: |Ad, N, Ad⟩ → |Ad, Ad, Ad⟩. Right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: New transitions available at both T4 and T5. Left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: Point-splitting a square lattice by adding virtual (diagonal) links. Blue Wilson loops and green Wilson lines illustrate equivalent operators on the two lattices. In particular, four-body plaquettes and three-body hopping operators on a square lattice become eight-body plaquettes and five-body hopping operators on the hexagonal lattice. Right: Point-splitting decomposes a five-point vertex singlet on… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The data associated with plaquette and hopping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top: Double-vertex cut on a square lattice before point-splitting. Bottom: Point-splitting to match [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Local depictions of two basis states related by hopping transition (flux strings and their endpoints are shown in red for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The three possible placements of a gauge-invariant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Interaction operators (blue) showing an isolated pla [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Example showing how to compute the matrix ele [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Plaquette interaction (blue) on a state with two ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Hopping operator (blue) acting on a state with one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Graphical illustration of point-splitting the external [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Hexagonal plaquette chain with four plaquettes. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: The new hopping transitions allowed on a four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Initial meson-like excitation (red) that we simulate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Real-time evolution of F0 and Nq for the free vacuum state |0⟩ at large coupling and mass (top). The six trunca￾tions give rise to only two distinguishable curves, with slightly different frequencies. Truncations T1, T2, T4, and T5 all fall on the slightly faster-oscillating curve (blue); whereas T3’ and T3 fall on the slower-oscillating curve (red). Plotting ratios to the highest truncation of a given co… view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Real-time evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Real-time evolution of Fϕ for the meson-like excita￾tion |ϕ⟩ at small coupling and mass, plotted up to duration t = 10 (top) and t = 100 (bottom). At early times, the me￾son loses its entire fidelity to the physical Hilbert space, as if thermalizing; but revivals occur, even at long times. space that correspond to these regimes are also slightly shifted compared to the 1 + 1D case—in particular, we genera… view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: This time, we plot both the strongly-coupled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Real-time evolution of F0, Nq, and G for the free vacuum state |0⟩ at large parameters (left) and small parameters (right) on the plaquette chain. All 2 + 1D truncations computed in this paper have nf = 1, and are shown with different shades of blue, in analogy with the 1+ 1D plots. Note that the choice of ratio or delta plotting is dependent on whether the observables get very close to zero. The observab… view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Real-time evolution of Fϕ for the meson-like excitation |ϕ⟩ at large parameters (left) and small parameters (right), plotted up to duration t = 10 (top) and t = 100 (bottom). Truncations T T2’ and T T2 remain very close together, even at long times. ment has two allowed configurations, corresponding to whether it resides on the left or right side of its external charge. Thus Fs3 in some sense measures whe… view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Time-evolution of fidelities for an initial string state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: Diagonal ensemble average of the average string [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_30.png] view at source ↗
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: Time-evolution of fidelities for an initial string state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_31.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: String-breaking of a length-3 string in a 1 + 1D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_32.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) require a representation of gauge fields and fermions on the finitely many degrees of freedom available on a quantum computer. We introduce a truncation of lattice QCD coupled to staggered fermions that includes (i) a local Krylov truncation that generates allowed basis states; (ii) a maximum allowed electric energy per link; (iii) a limit on the number of fermions per site; and (iv) a truncation in the large N_c scaling of Hamiltonian matrix elements. Explicit truncated Hamiltonians for 1+1D and 2+1D lattices are given, and numerical simulations of string-breaking dynamics are performed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a truncation of lattice SU(Nc) Yang-Mills theory with staggered fermions consisting of (i) a local Krylov truncation generating allowed basis states, (ii) a maximum allowed electric energy per link, (iii) a limit on the number of fermions per site, and (iv) a truncation in the large-Nc scaling of Hamiltonian matrix elements. Explicit truncated Hamiltonians are constructed for 1+1D and 2+1D lattices, and numerical simulations of string-breaking dynamics are reported.

Significance. If the truncations are shown to preserve confinement and string breaking without uncontrolled errors, the approach would offer a concrete route to quantum simulation of QCD with a drastically reduced Hilbert space. The explicit Hamiltonian constructions for low-dimensional cases and the demonstration of string-breaking dynamics inside the truncated models constitute a useful technical contribution toward that goal.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical Simulations] Numerical Simulations section: the reported string-breaking dynamics lack any quantitative benchmark against the untruncated SU(Nc) theory, against known analytic results (e.g., exact Schwinger-model string tension in 1+1D), or against the limit in which the cutoffs are removed. No error bars, convergence tests with respect to the electric-energy or fermion-number cutoffs, or systematic uncertainty estimates are provided. This directly undermines the central claim that the four truncations preserve essential non-perturbative dynamics.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that simulations are performed but does not indicate the spatial dimensions or the specific observables (string tension, breaking distance, etc.) that are measured; adding this information would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the potential of the truncation approach for quantum simulation of QCD. We address the major comment on the numerical simulations below, providing a point-by-point response.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical Simulations section: the reported string-breaking dynamics lack any quantitative benchmark against the untruncated SU(Nc) theory, against known analytic results (e.g., exact Schwinger-model string tension in 1+1D), or against the limit in which the cutoffs are removed. No error bars, convergence tests with respect to the electric-energy or fermion-number cutoffs, or systematic uncertainty estimates are provided. This directly undermines the central claim that the four truncations preserve essential non-perturbative dynamics.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative benchmarks and convergence tests are essential to substantiate the claim that the truncations preserve key non-perturbative features. In the revised manuscript we will add: (i) a direct comparison of the extracted string tension in the 1+1D truncated model (for Nc=2 and Nc=3) to the exact analytic Schwinger-model result; (ii) convergence plots of the string-breaking time and final meson separation as functions of the electric-energy cutoff and the maximum fermion number per site; (iii) statistical error bars obtained from an ensemble of time-evolution trajectories. These additions will be placed in a new subsection of the Numerical Simulations section. We note, however, that a direct numerical benchmark against the fully untruncated SU(Nc) theory remains infeasible for the lattice volumes and Nc values considered, precisely because the untruncated Hilbert space grows exponentially and is the reason the truncation scheme was introduced. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct quantitative comparison of string-breaking dynamics to the untruncated SU(Nc) theory for the system sizes and Nc values used in the simulations, owing to the exponential growth of the untruncated Hilbert space that renders classical simulation impossible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Explicit truncations introduced as cutoffs; no predictions reduce to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper defines four truncation rules (local Krylov basis generation, per-link electric energy bound, per-site fermion number limit, and large-Nc scaling of matrix elements) and then performs numerical simulations of string-breaking dynamics inside the resulting finite Hamiltonians for 1+1D and 2+1D lattices. These rules are stated as explicit modeling choices rather than parameters fitted to any target observable. No equation in the derivation equates a claimed dynamical feature (e.g., string tension or confinement scale) back to the truncation cutoffs by algebraic identity. Self-citations to earlier truncation techniques exist but are not load-bearing for the central claim that the chosen cutoffs preserve essential non-perturbative physics; that claim remains an untested modeling assumption rather than a self-referential reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four explicit truncation choices whose validity is assumed rather than derived; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • maximum allowed electric energy per link
    Cutoff chosen to restrict the local Hilbert space dimension; value not specified in abstract.
  • maximum number of fermions per site
    Occupancy limit introduced to keep basis finite; specific integer value not given in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Large-Nc scaling provides a valid approximation for Hamiltonian matrix elements in the truncated theory
    Invoked to truncate the interaction terms; appears in the description of truncation (iv).
  • domain assumption Staggered fermion formulation remains consistent under the listed truncations
    Assumed when coupling the truncated gauge fields to staggered fermions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5422 in / 1370 out tokens · 42571 ms · 2026-05-16T08:22:40.417826+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Thermalization of SU(2) Lattice Gauge Fields on Quantum Computers

    hep-lat 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Quantum hardware simulation of SU(2) lattice gauge thermalization matches classical extrapolations up to 101 plaquettes after error mitigation, establishing feasibility for chaotic quantum field systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

207 extracted references · 207 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    We perform simulations for an initial string state|s 9⟩spanning 9 links (drawn in Fig

    String Breaking in2 + 1D For a hexagonal plaquette chain consisting ofP= 4 plaquettes, we can now repeat much of the same analysis as in the 1 + 1D case above. We perform simulations for an initial string state|s 9⟩spanning 9 links (drawn in Fig. 19) atm= 1.5 andN c = 3, leavinggarbitrary for now. On the hexagonal lattice, the simplest way to break this s...

    work page

  2. [2]

    direct product repre- sentation

    String Breaking at LargeN c To conclude our discussion about string breaking, we investigate the connection between our largeN c trunca- tions and the well-known fact that string breaking be- comes suppressed in the largeN c limit of SU(N c) lat- tice gauge theory. We work in a theory wherem= 3.0 (which is the strongly-coupled regime for both our 1+1D and...

    work page

  3. [3]

    enlarged

    Pure Gauge Theory A gauge-invariant state|ψ⟩on the entire lattice must remain invariant under every gauge transformation that acts only on a single vertex, i.e., transformations Ω n0,g : V →Gof the form Ωn0,g(n)≡ ( gifn=n 0, IdG ifn̸=n 0, (B1) 39 where IdG denotes the identity element inG. In fact, any finite gauge transformation on the lattice is generat...

    work page

  4. [4]

    hopping master equation

    Gauge Theory with Fermions Given the constructions in the pure gauge case, we now need to take into account the extra fermion degrees of freedom to upgrade our previous definitions. The primary object that enters the picture is a copy of the fermionic Fock space at each lattice site Pn ≡ NcM p=0   p^ j=1 VN   ,(B8) whereV N ∼= CNc denotes the target s...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields(Cam- bridge University Press, 1995)

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields(Cam- bridge University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  6. [6]

    Gattringer and C

    C. Gattringer and C. Lang,Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice: An Introductory Presentation(Springer Science & Business Media, 2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Zee,Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell(Princeton University Press, 2003)

    A. Zee,Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell(Princeton University Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Kogut and L

    J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Physical Review D11, 395 (1975)

    work page 1975

  9. [9]

    J. B. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys.51, 659 (1979)

    work page 1979

  10. [10]

    H. J. Rothe,Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction (Fourth Edition)(World Scientific Publishing Company, 2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    K. G. Wilson, Physical Review D10, 2445 (1974)

    work page 1974

  12. [12]

    K. G. Wilson, inNew Phenomena in Subnuclear Physics: Part A, edited by A. Zichichi (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1977) pp. 69–142

    work page 1977

  13. [13]

    Creutz, L

    M. Creutz, L. Jacobs, and C. Rebbi, Physical Review D20, 1915 (1979)

    work page 1915

  14. [14]

    Creutz, Physical Review D21, 2308 (1980)

    M. Creutz, Physical Review D21, 2308 (1980)

    work page 1980

  15. [15]

    Creutz, L

    M. Creutz, L. Jacobs, and C. Rebbi, Physics Reports 95, 201 (1983)

    work page 1983

  16. [16]

    Creutz,Lattice Gauge Theory and Monte Carlo Methods, Tech

    M. Creutz,Lattice Gauge Theory and Monte Carlo Methods, Tech. Rep. BNL-42086 (Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States), 1988)

    work page 1988

  17. [17]

    Creutz, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supple- ments10, 1 (1989)

    M. Creutz, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supple- ments10, 1 (1989)

    work page 1989

  18. [18]

    Montvay and G

    I. Montvay and G. M¨ unster,Quantum Fields on a Lat- tice, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1994)

    work page 1994

  19. [19]

    T. D. Kieu and C. J. Griffin, Phys. Rev. E49, 3855 (1994)

    work page 1994

  20. [20]

    Philipsen and H

    O. Philipsen and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 4056 (1998)

    work page 1998

  21. [21]

    Knechtli and R

    F. Knechtli and R. Sommer, Physics Letters B440, 345 (1998)

    work page 1998

  22. [22]

    G. S. Bali, H. Neff, T. D¨ ussel, T. Lippert, and K. Schilling (SESAM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D71, 114513 (2005)

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    Pepe and U.-J

    M. Pepe and U.-J. Wiese, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 191601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    Bulava, B

    J. Bulava, B. H¨ orz, F. Knechtli, V. Koch, G. Moir, C. Morningstar, and M. Peardon, Physics Letters B 793, 493 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    D. C. Hackett, K. Howe, C. Hughes, W. Jay, E. T. Neil, and J. N. Simone, Physical Review A99, 062341 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Troyer and U.-J

    M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Physical Review Letters94, 170201 (2005)

    work page 2005

  27. [27]

    Simulating QCD at finite density

    P. de Forcrand, “Simulating qcd at finite density,” (2010), arXiv:1005.0539 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling, and B. R. Webber,QCD and Collider Physics(Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  29. [29]

    Schollw¨ ock, Annals of Physics January 2011 Special Issue,326, 96 (2011)

    U. Schollw¨ ock, Annals of Physics January 2011 Special Issue,326, 96 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Or´ us, Annals of Physics349, 117 (2014)

    R. Or´ us, Annals of Physics349, 117 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Montangero,Introduction to Tensor Network Meth- ods: Numerical Simulations of Low-Dimensional Many- Body Quantum Systems(Springer International Pub- lishing, Cham, 2018)

    S. Montangero,Introduction to Tensor Network Meth- ods: Numerical Simulations of Low-Dimensional Many- Body Quantum Systems(Springer International Pub- lishing, Cham, 2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Or´ us, Nature Reviews Physics1, 538 (2019)

    R. Or´ us, Nature Reviews Physics1, 538 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [34]

    Dalmonte and S

    M. Dalmonte and S. Montangero, Contemporary Physics57, 388 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [35]

    Tensor net- works for lattice gauge theories beyond one dimen- sion: A roadmap,

    G. Magnifico, G. Cataldi, M. Rigobello, P. Majcen, D. Jaschke, P. Silvi, and S. Montangero, “Tensor net- works for lattice gauge theories beyond one dimen- sion: A roadmap,” (2024), arXiv:2407.03058 [cond- mat, physics:hep-lat, physics:hep-th, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [36]

    K¨ uhn, E

    S. K¨ uhn, E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and M. C. Ba˜ nuls, Jour- nal of High Energy Physics2015, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [37]

    Pichler, M

    T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller, and S. Montangero, Physical Review X6, 011023 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [38]

    Kasper, F

    V. Kasper, F. Hebenstreit, M. Oberthaler, and J. Berges, Physics Letters B760, 742 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [39]

    Buyens, J

    B. Buyens, J. Haegeman, F. Hebenstreit, F. Verstraete, and K. Van Acoleyen, Phys. Rev. D96, 114501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [40]

    Y. Kuno, S. Sakane, K. Kasamatsu, I. Ichinose, and T. Matsui, Physical Review D95, 094507 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [41]

    P. Sala, T. Shi, S. K¨ uhn, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, E. Demler, and J. I. Cirac, Physical Review D98, 034505 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [42]

    Spitz and J

    D. Spitz and J. Berges, Physical Review D99, 036020 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [43]

    J. Park, Y. Kuno, and I. Ichinose, Phys. Rev. A100, 013629 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [44]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Phys. Rev. X10, 021041 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [45]

    Magnifico, M

    G. Magnifico, M. Dalmonte, P. Facchi, S. Pascazio, F. V. Pepe, and E. Ercolessi, Quantum4, 281 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [46]

    Notarnicola, M

    S. Notarnicola, M. Collura, and S. Montangero, Physi- cal Review Research2, 013288 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [47]

    Chanda, J

    T. Chanda, J. Zakrzewski, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagli- acozzo, Physical Review Letters124, 180602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [48]

    String breaking in a$2+1$d$\mathbb{Z} 2$lattice gauge theory,

    U. Borla, J. J. Osborne, S. Moroz, and J. C. Halimeh, “String breaking in a$2+1$d$\mathbb{Z} 2$lattice gauge theory,” (2025), arXiv:2501.17929 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [49]

    String breaking dynamics and glueball formation in a$2+1$d lattice gauge theory,

    K. Xu, U. Borla, S. Moroz, and J. C. Halimeh, “String breaking dynamics and glueball formation in a$2+1$d lattice gauge theory,” (2025), arXiv:2507.01950 [hep- lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [50]

    Role of plaquette term in gen- uine$2+1$d string dynamics on quantum simulators,

    Y. Tian, N. S. Srivatsa, K. Xu, J. J. Osborne, U. Borla, and J. C. Halimeh, “Role of plaquette term in gen- uine$2+1$d string dynamics on quantum simulators,” (2025), arXiv:2508.05736 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [51]

    Barata and E

    J. Barata and E. Rico, (2025), arXiv:2502.17558 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [52]

    Roughening and dynam- ics of an electric flux string in a (2+1)d lattice gauge 50 theory,

    F. D. Marcantonio, S. Pradhan, S. Vallecorsa, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, and E. R. Ortega, “Roughening and dynam- ics of an electric flux string in a (2+1)d lattice gauge 50 theory,” (2025), arXiv:2505.23853 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    W.-T. Xu, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Physical Review Letters135, 036503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [54]

    Out-of-equilibrium dynamics in a u(1) lattice gauge theory via local infor- mation flows: Scattering and string breaking,

    C. Artiaco, J. Barata, and E. Rico, “Out-of-equilibrium dynamics in a u(1) lattice gauge theory via local infor- mation flows: Scattering and string breaking,” (2025), arXiv:2510.16101 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [55]

    Real-time string dynamics in a 2+1d non-abelian lattice gauge the- ory: String breaking, glueball formation, baryon block- ade, and tension reduction,

    G. Cataldi, S. Orlando, and J. C. Halimeh, “Real-time string dynamics in a 2+1d non-abelian lattice gauge the- ory: String breaking, glueball formation, baryon block- ade, and tension reduction,” (2025), arXiv:2509.08868 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [56]

    String breaking and glueball dynam- ics in 2 + 1d quantum link electrodynamics,

    J. Cao, R. Joshi, Y. Tian, N. S. Srivatsa, and J. C. Halimeh, “String breaking and glueball dynam- ics in 2 + 1d quantum link electrodynamics,” (2026), arXiv:2601.16166 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [57]

    Magnifico, G

    G. Magnifico, G. Cataldi, M. Rigobello, P. Majcen, D. Jaschke, P. Silvi, and S. Montangero, Communi- cations Physics8, 322 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [58]

    Byrnes and Y

    T. Byrnes and Y. Yamamoto, Physical Review A73, 022328 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [59]

    Zohar, J

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 014401 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [60]

    Aidelsburgeret al., Phil

    M. Aidelsburgeret al., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A380, 20210064 (2021), arXiv:2106.03063 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [61]

    Zohar, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soci- ety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 380, 20210069 (2021)

    E. Zohar, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soci- ety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 380, 20210069 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [62]

    J. a. Barata, X. Du, M. Li, W. Qian, and C. A. Salgado, Phys. Rev. D106, 074013 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [63]

    N. Klco, A. Roggero, and M. J. Savage, Reports on Progress in Physics85, 064301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [64]

    J. a. Barata, X. Du, M. Li, W. Qian, and C. A. Salgado, Phys. Rev. D108, 056023 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [65]

    Realtime dynamics of hyperon spin correlations from string frag- mentation in a deformed four-flavor Schwinger model,

    J. Barata, W. Gong, and R. Venugopalan, “Realtime dynamics of hyperon spin correlations from string frag- mentation in a deformed four-flavor Schwinger model,” (2024), arXiv:2308.13596 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [66]

    C. W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, A. B. Balantekin, T. Bhat- tacharya, M. Carena, W. A. de Jong, P. Draper, A. El-Khadra, N. Gemelke, M. Hanada, D. Kharzeev, H. Lamm, Y.-Y. Li, J. Liu, M. Lukin, Y. Meurice, C. Monroe, B. Nachman, G. Pagano, J. Preskill, E. Ri- naldi, A. Roggero, D. I. Santiago, M. J. Savage, I. Sid- diqi, G. Siopsis, D. Van Zanten, N. Wiebe, Y. Ya...

    work page 2023

  66. [67]

    C. W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, Nature Reviews Physics5, 420 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [68]

    Di Meglio, K

    A. Di Meglio, K. Jansen, I. Tavernelli, C. Alexandrou, S. Arunachalam, C. W. Bauer, K. Borras, S. Carrazza, A. Crippa, V. Croft, R. de Putter, A. Delgado, V. Dun- jko, D. J. Egger, E. Fern´ andez-Combarro, E. Fuchs, L. Funcke, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M. Grossi, J. C. Hal- imeh, Z. Holmes, S. K¨ uhn, D. Lacroix, R. Lewis, D. Lucchesi, M. L. Martinez, F. Melo...

    work page 2024

  68. [69]

    Hariprakash, N

    S. Hariprakash, N. S. Modi, M. Kreshchuk, C. F. Kane, and C. W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. A111, 022419 (2025), arXiv:2312.11637 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [70]

    Emergent gauge theory in ry- dberg atom arrays,

    Y. Cheng and H. Zhai, “Emergent gauge theory in ry- dberg atom arrays,” (2024), arXiv:2401.07708 [cond- mat, physics:hep-lat, physics:hep-th, physics:quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [71]

    Stabilizing gauge theo- ries in quantum simulators: A brief review,

    J. C. Halimeh and P. Hauke, “Stabilizing gauge theo- ries in quantum simulators: A brief review,” (2022), arXiv:2204.13709 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [72]

    Quantum algorithms for transport coefficients in gauge theories,

    T. D. Cohen, H. Lamm, S. Lawrence, and Y. Yamauchi, “Quantum algorithms for transport coefficients in gauge theories,” (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [73]

    J. a. Barata and S. Mukherjee, Phys. Rev. D111, L031901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [74]

    K. Lee, F. Turro, and X. Yao, Physical Review D111, 054514 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [75]

    Turro, A

    F. Turro, A. Ciavarella, and X. Yao, Physical Review D109, 114511 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [76]

    J. C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and B. Yang, Nature Physics21, 25 (2025)

    work page 2025

  76. [77]

    Efficient use of quantum computers for collider physics,

    C. W. Bauer, “Efficient use of quantum computers for collider physics,” (2025), arXiv:2503.16602 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [78]

    Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories,

    J. C. Halimeh, N. Mueller, J. Knolle, Z. Papi´ c, and Z. Davoudi, “Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories,” (2025), arXiv:2509.03586 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [79]

    C. W. Bauer, M. Freytsis, and B. Nachman, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 212001 (2021), arXiv:2102.05044 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [80]

    E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Nature534, 516 (2016)

    work page 2016

  80. [81]

    N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Mor- ris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, Physical Review A98, 032331 (2018)

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.