pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.05823 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-05 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Horizon Multipole Moments of a Kerr Black Hole

Eric Gourgoulhon , Alexandre Le Tiec , Marc Casals
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Kerr black holehorizon multipolesisolated horizonsnon-expanding horizonsmultipole momentsblack hole spinevent horizon
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two definitions of Kerr horizon multipole moments give different results for spinning black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper evaluates the multipole moments associated with the event horizon of a Kerr black hole according to two separate proposals in the literature. The first proposal uses the framework of axisymmetric isolated horizons, while the second applies to general non-expanding horizons that need not be axisymmetric. Detailed calculations demonstrate that these two approaches produce identical multipole values only in limiting cases such as zero spin, but yield distinct results whenever the spin parameter is nonzero for multipoles of degree one and higher, or for degree two and higher even in the slow-spin approximation. A curious reader would care because horizon multipoles encode geometric properties of the black hole boundary that may connect to observable quantities like gravitational radiation or the black hole's response to external fields. Establishing whether the definitions are equivalent is therefore necessary for consistent modeling of black hole dynamics.

Core claim

For the axisymmetric isolated horizon definition a closed-form expression for the multipole moments in terms of the Kerr spin parameter a and the harmonic degree l is derived. For the generic non-expanding horizon definition closed-form expressions are obtained for the conformal unit round metric on the horizon, the associated electric and magnetic potentials, and the multipole values in the small-a limit. The two sets of multipoles are shown to differ for all l greater than or equal to 1 when a is nonzero and for l greater than or equal to 2 in the small-a regime, while exhibiting the same parity properties and leading-order scaling behavior as the Hansen field multipoles.

What carries the argument

The horizon multipole moments extracted from the two-dimensional geometry and curvature of the Kerr event horizon using either the axisymmetric isolated horizon or the generic non-expanding horizon definitions.

If this is right

  • The axisymmetric definition supplies an exact formula for every multipole order.
  • The generic definition supplies exact expressions in the slow-rotation limit.
  • Both definitions reproduce the parity and small-spin scaling of the asymptotic field multipoles.
  • The difference between definitions sets in at the dipole level for any spin and at the quadrupole level for small spin.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This discrepancy suggests that the choice of horizon definition could affect predictions for black hole mergers in numerical relativity codes.
  • Future calculations might test which definition better matches the multipoles inferred from gravitational wave data.
  • A unified definition valid for both axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric cases could resolve the inconsistency.

Load-bearing premise

Both proposed definitions for horizon multipoles can be applied without change to the specific geometry of the Kerr event horizon.

What would settle it

A numerical integration of the multipole moment formulas over a Kerr horizon 2-surface for spin parameter a = 0.5M and multipole order l = 2 that yields identical numerical values from both definitions would falsify the reported difference.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.05823 by Alexandre Le Tiec, Eric Gourgoulhon, Marc Casals.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Null hypersurface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Two cross-section slicings ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Isometry Φ between two arbitrary cross-sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Shape and current horizon multipole moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Mass-type source multipole moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Current-type source multipole moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Colatitude coordinate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Electric potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Mean value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Magnetic potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Shape multipole moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Current multipole moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Convergence of the multipole expansions ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Comparison, for the Kerr horizon, between the shape multipole moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The horizon multipole moments of a Kerr black hole are computed from two distinct definitions that have been proposed in the literature. The first one [Ashtekar et al., Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 2549 (2004)] regards axisymmetric isolated horizons, while the second one [Ashtekar et al., J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 28 (2022)] applies to generic (i.e., not necessarily axisymmetric) non-expanding horizons. We review these definitions in a common frame and perform a detailed study of the resulting multipole moments for the Kerr event horizon. The horizon multipoles are found to share several properties with the (Hansen) field multipoles, including parity constraints and the leading scaling behavior with respect to the Kerr spin parameter a in the regime of small a. For the axisymmetry-based definition, we have obtained a closed-form expression of the multipole moments in terms of a and the spherical harmonic degree l. For the generic definition, we have established closed-form expressions for the conformal unit round metric, the `electric' and `magnetic' potentials related to the multipoles, and the values of the multipoles in the small a limit. We show that the two definitions lead to different values of the Kerr horizon multipoles as soon as l >= 1 (generic nonzero value of a) or l >= 2 (small a limit).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes the horizon multipole moments of the Kerr black hole using two definitions from the literature: the axisymmetric isolated horizon definition of Ashtekar et al. (2004) and the generic non-expanding horizon definition of Ashtekar et al. (2022). It reviews both in a common framework, derives a closed-form expression for the multipoles under the axisymmetric definition in terms of the spin parameter a and harmonic degree l, obtains closed forms for the conformal round metric and electric/magnetic potentials under the generic definition along with small-a multipole values, and demonstrates that the two sets of multipoles differ for l ≥ 1 at generic nonzero a (or l ≥ 2 in the small-a limit). The moments are shown to share parity and leading small-a scaling properties with the Hansen field multipoles.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work provides concrete, usable closed-form expressions that allow direct comparison of two competing horizon-multipole prescriptions on the standard Kerr test case. This is valuable for clarifying ambiguities in isolated-horizon and non-expanding-horizon frameworks, for benchmarking numerical-relativity codes, and for connecting horizon quantities to asymptotic field multipoles. The explicit small-a results and conformal-metric expressions are particularly useful for analytic follow-up work.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (axisymmetric isolated horizon): The closed-form multipole expression in a and l is stated to be obtained, but the manuscript does not display the explicit formula (or at least the first few l values) that would allow immediate verification of the claimed difference from the generic definition already at l=1 for nonzero a.
  2. [§4] §4 (generic non-expanding horizon): While closed forms for the conformal metric and potentials are given, the small-a multipole expansion is only summarized; an explicit term-by-term comparison with the axisymmetric result for l=2 would strengthen the central claim that the definitions diverge in this limit.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the electric and magnetic potentials in the generic definition should be cross-referenced to the axisymmetric case to make the comparison table (if present) self-contained.
  2. [§2] A brief remark on whether the Kerr horizon satisfies the non-expanding condition identically under the 2022 definition would remove any residual ambiguity about direct applicability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested additions into the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (axisymmetric isolated horizon): The closed-form multipole expression in a and l is stated to be obtained, but the manuscript does not display the explicit formula (or at least the first few l values) that would allow immediate verification of the claimed difference from the generic definition already at l=1 for nonzero a.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit closed-form expression was derived but not displayed in §3. In the revised manuscript we will present the full formula for the axisymmetric isolated horizon multipoles M_l(a) together with the first few explicit values (l=1,2,3) to permit immediate verification of the l=1 difference at nonzero a. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (generic non-expanding horizon): While closed forms for the conformal metric and potentials are given, the small-a multipole expansion is only summarized; an explicit term-by-term comparison with the axisymmetric result for l=2 would strengthen the central claim that the definitions diverge in this limit.

    Authors: We appreciate the suggestion. In the revised version we will add the explicit small-a series for the l=2 multipole under the generic definition and provide a direct term-by-term comparison with the corresponding axisymmetric result, highlighting the differing coefficients. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; explicit derivations from external definitions

full rationale

The paper reviews two distinct horizon multipole definitions from independent prior literature (Ashtekar et al. 2004 and 2022), applies them directly to the Kerr event horizon, derives closed-form expressions for the multipoles (or their small-a limits) under each definition, and compares the results to show differences for l >= 1 or l >= 2. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the reported distinction follows from algebraic comparison of independently obtained expressions. The derivation chain is self-contained against the external definitions and the known Kerr metric, with no renaming of known results or smuggling of ansatze.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the Kerr solution satisfying vacuum Einstein equations and the applicability of the two horizon definitions to it.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Kerr metric is an exact solution to the vacuum Einstein equations
    Standard background in general relativity invoked for the spacetime.
  • domain assumption The 2004 axisymmetric isolated horizon definition and 2022 generic non-expanding horizon definition both apply to the Kerr event horizon
    Central to reviewing and applying the definitions in a common frame.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 1251 out tokens · 31791 ms · 2026-05-16T06:55:51.106173+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing Kerr Symmetry Breaking with LISA Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LISA EMRIs can constrain deviations from Kerr equatorial symmetry to 10^{-2} and axial symmetry to 10^{-3} using Analytic Kludge waveforms and Fisher analysis.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    double precision

    ThenM ψ(θ) =f(θ), wherefis a strictly decreasing function varying in [ √e,1/ √ 2] over the intervalθ∈[0, π/2]. The average⟨E⟩of the electric potentialEwith respect to the measure ˚ε ab is given by ⟨E⟩ ≡ 1 4π I S Ed ˚S= 1 4π I S E ψ2 dS= 1 2 Z 1 −1 ln (Rψ) (Rψ)2 d(cosθ) = 1 5 β4 +O(β 6),(6.36) which vanishes ‘quickly’ asβ→0 (small-spin regime), as can be s...

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    (A1) and integrating by partsℓtimes, while noticing that the boundary contributions atx=±1 vanish thanks to the factor (x 2 −1) ℓ in Eq

    Expression in terms of the hypergeometric function Our starting point is the Rodrigues formula for the Legendre polynomials, namely Pℓ(x) = 1 2ℓℓ! dℓ dxℓ (x2 −1) ℓ .(A2) Substituting this formula into Eq. (A1) and integrating by partsℓtimes, while noticing that the boundary contributions atx=±1 vanish thanks to the factor (x 2 −1) ℓ in Eq. (A2), we obtain...

    work page

  3. [3]

    n+ 3 2 P (e) 2n (ˆa)−(1 + ˆa2)dP (e) 2n (ˆa) dz + Q(e) 2n(ˆa) 2ˆa # ,(A26a) Q(o) ℓ (ˆa)≡B ℓ

    Hypergeometric function in terms of arctangent Here we express the hypergeometric functionF ℓ(ˆa2)≡ 2F1 ℓ+3 2 , ℓ+4 2 , ℓ+ 3 2;−ˆa2 appear- ing in (A10) in terms of arctan ˆaand rational functions of ˆa. Let us first show the derivation for the case whereℓis even. That is, we setℓ= 2n, with n∈N, so thatF ℓ(ˆa2) = 2F1 n+ 3 2 , n+ 2,2n+ 3 2;−ˆa2 . We first ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    +∞X k=0 β2k (−x)k (k+ 1)! Qk(x) #n

    Scaling with spin Defineϵ(x;β)≡z(x;β)−x=O(β 2) and perform a Taylor series expansion ofP ℓ(z(x;β)) aboutz=x. Then the integral (C1) becomes Jℓ = +∞X n=0 Jℓ,n withJ ℓ,n = 1 n! Z 1 −1 dx ϵn(x;β)P (n) ℓ (x) (1−iˆax)3 .(C3) Next, using the fact that tanh′(x) = 1−tanh 2(x), we may perform a Taylor series expansion ofϵ(x;β) itself nearβ= 0, at fixedx, according...

    work page

  5. [5]

    the coefficientα ℓ in Eq

    Numerical prefactor Having established thatJ ℓ ∼(iˆa)ℓ in the regime where ˆa≪1, we would like to determine in closed form the numerical prefactor, i.e. the coefficientα ℓ in Eq. (C2). Given the intricate expression for the functionf n(x) appearing in (C6), obtaining a closed-form formula forα ℓ 49 from the analysis above is challenging. Instead, we shall...

    work page

  6. [10]

    J. D. Jackson,Classical electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (John Wiley, New York, 1998)

    work page 1998

  7. [11]

    Poisson and C

    E. Poisson and C. M. Will,Gravity: Newtonian, post-Newtonian, relativistic(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [12]

    R. P. Geroch, Multipole moments. I. Flat space, J. Math. Phys.11, 1955 (1970)

    work page 1955

  9. [13]

    R. P. Geroch, Multipole moments. II. Curved space, J. Math. Phys.11, 2580 (1970)

    work page 1970

  10. [14]

    R. O. Hansen, Multipole moments of stationary space-times, J. Math. Phys.15, 46 (1974)

    work page 1974

  11. [15]

    K. S. Thorne, Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 299 (1980)

    work page 1980

  12. [16]

    Beig and W

    R. Beig and W. Simon, On the multipole expansion for stationary space-times, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A376, 333 (1981)

    work page 1981

  13. [17]

    Simon and R

    W. Simon and R. Beig, The multipole structure of stationary space-times, J. Math. Phys.24, 1163 (1983)

    work page 1983

  14. [18]

    G¨ ursel, Multipole moments for stationary systems: The equivalence of the Geroch-Hansen formulation and the Thorne formulation, Gen

    Y. G¨ ursel, Multipole moments for stationary systems: The equivalence of the Geroch-Hansen formulation and the Thorne formulation, Gen. Rel. Grav.15, 737 (1983)

    work page 1983

  15. [19]

    Fodor, C

    G. Fodor, C. Hoenselaers, and Z. Perj´ es, Multipole moments of axisymmetric systems in relativity, J. Math. Phys.30, 2252 (1989)

    work page 1989

  16. [20]

    W. G. Dixon, A covariant multipole formalism for extended test bodies in general relativity, Il Nuovo Cimento34, 317 (1964)

    work page 1964

  17. [21]

    W. G. Dixon, Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity I. Momentum and angular momentum, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A314, 499 (1970)

    work page 1970

  18. [22]

    W. G. Dixon, The definition of multipole moments for extended bodies, Gen. Rel. Grav.4, 199 (1973)

    work page 1973

  19. [23]

    W. G. Dixon, Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity III. Equations of motion, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A277, 59 (1974)

    work page 1974

  20. [24]

    W. Dixon, Extended bodies in general relativity: Their description and motion, inIsolated gravitating systems in general relativity, Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Vol. 67, edited by J. Ehlers (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979) p. 156

    work page 1979

  21. [25]

    A. I. Harte, Mechanics of extended masses in general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 055012 (2012), arXiv:1103.0543 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [26]

    A. I. Harte, Motion in classical field theories and the foundations of the self-force problem, Fund. Theor. Phys.179, 327 (2015), arXiv:1405.5077 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  23. [27]

    Multipole Moments of Isolated Horizons

    A. Ashtekar, J. Engle, T. Pawlowski, and C. Van Den Broeck, Multipole moments of isolated horizons, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 2549 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0401114. 51

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  24. [28]

    Introduction to dynamical horizons in numerical relativity

    E. Schnetter, B. Krishnan, and F. Beyer, Introduction to dynamical horizons in numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D74, 024028 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0604015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  25. [29]

    The Final Remnant of Binary Black Hole Mergers: Multipolar Analysis

    R. Owen, The final remnant of binary black hole mergers: Multipolar analysis, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084012 (2009), arXiv:0907.0280 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [30]

    Dynamical Black Holes: Approach to the Final State

    A. Ashtekar, M. Campiglia, and S. Shah, Dynamical black holes: Approach to the final state, Phys. Rev. D88, 064045 (2013), arXiv:1306.5697 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [31]

    Ashtekar, N

    A. Ashtekar, N. Khera, M. Kolanowski, and J. Lewandowski, Non-expanding horizons: multipoles and the symmetry group, Journal of High Energy Physics2022, 28 (2022), arXiv:2111.07873 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [32]

    Excised black hole spacetimes: quasi-local horizon formalism applied to the Kerr example

    N. Vasset, J. Novak, and J. L. Jaramillo, Excised black hole spacetimes: Quasilocal horizon formalism applied to the Kerr example, Phys. Rev. D79, 124010 (2009), arXiv:0901.2052 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  29. [33]

    Prasad, Generalized source multipole moments of dynamical horizons in binary black hole mergers (2021), arXiv:2109.01193 [gr-qc]

    V. Prasad, Generalized source multipole moments of dynamical horizons in binary black hole mergers (2021), arXiv:2109.01193 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [34]

    Prasad, A

    V. Prasad, A. Gupta, S. Bose, and B. Krishnan, Tidal deformation of dynamical horizons in binary black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D105, 044019 (2022), arXiv:2106.02595 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [35]

    Prasad, Tidal deformation of dynamical horizons in binary black hole mergers and its imprint on gravitational radiation, Phys

    V. Prasad, Tidal deformation of dynamical horizons in binary black hole mergers and its imprint on gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D109, 044033 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [36]

    Ribes Metidieri, B

    A. Ribes Metidieri, B. Bonga, and B. Krishnan, Tidal deformations of slowly spinning isolated horizons, Phys. Rev. D110, 024069 (2024), arXiv:2403.17114 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [37]

    Understanding the "anti-kick" in the merger of binary black holes

    L. Rezzolla, R. P. Macedo, and J. L. Jaramillo, Understanding the “Antikick” in the Merger of Binary Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 221101 (2010), arXiv:1003.0873 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  34. [38]

    J. L. Jaramillo, R. P. Macedo, P. Moesta, and L. Rezzolla, Black-hole horizons as probes of black-hole dynamics. I. Post-merger recoil in head-on collisions, Phys. Rev. D85, 084030 (2012), arXiv:1108.0060 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [39]

    Pook-Kolb, O

    D. Pook-Kolb, O. Birnholtz, J. L. Jaramillo, B. Krishnan, and E. Schnetter, Horizons in a binary black hole merger II: Fluxes, multipole moments and stability (2020), arXiv:2006.03940 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [40]

    Mourier, X

    P. Mourier, X. Jim´ enez Forteza, D. Pook-Kolb, B. Krishnan, and E. Schnetter, Quasinormal modes and their overtones at the common horizon in a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. D103, 044054 (2021), arXiv:2010.15186 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [41]

    Dynamics of marginally trapped surfaces in a binary black hole merger: Growth and approach to equilibrium

    A. Gupta, B. Krishnan, A. B. Nielsen, and E. Schnetter, Dynamics of marginally trapped surfaces in a binary black hole merger: Growth and approach to equilibrium, Phys. Rev. D 97, 084028 (2018), arXiv:1801.07048 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [42]

    Chenet al., Multipole moments on the common horizon in a binary-black-hole simulation, Phys

    Y. Chenet al., Multipole moments on the common horizon in a binary-black-hole simulation, Phys. Rev. D106, 124045 (2022), arXiv:2208.02965 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [43]

    Ribes Metidieri, B

    A. Ribes Metidieri, B. Bonga, and B. Krishnan, Black hole tomography: Unveiling black hole horizon dynamics via ringdown observations, Phys. Rev. D111, 104075 (2025), arXiv:2501.08964 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [44]

    Rel.28, 8 (2025), arXiv:2502.11825 [gr-qc]

    A. Ashtekar and B. Krishnan, Quasi-local black hole horizons: recent advances, Living Reviews in Relativity28, 8 (2025), arXiv:2502.11825 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [45]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, Post-Newtonian theory for gravitational waves, Living Reviews in Relativity27, 4 (2024), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [46]

    P. T. Chru´ sciel, J. L. Costa, and M. Heusler, Stationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond, Living Reviews in Relativity15, 7 (2012), arXiv:1205.6112 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [47]

    R. M. Wald,General relativity(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984). 52

    work page 1984

  44. [48]

    S. W. Hawking, Black holes in general relativity, Commun. Math. Phys.25, 152 (1972)

    work page 1972

  45. [49]

    P. T. Chrusciel and R. M. Wald, On the topology of stationary black holes, Classical and Quantum Gravity11, L147 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9410004 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  46. [50]

    T. Damour,Quelques propri´ et´ es m´ ecaniques, ´ electromagn´ etiques, thermodynamiques et quan- tiques des trous noirs, Th` ese de Doctorat d’ ´Etat, Universit´ e Paris 6 (1979), available at https://www.ihes.fr/∼damour/Articles/

    work page 1979

  47. [51]

    Damour, Surface Effects in Black-Hole Physics, inProceedings of the Second Marcel Gross- mann Meeting on General Relativity, edited by R

    T. Damour, Surface Effects in Black-Hole Physics, inProceedings of the Second Marcel Gross- mann Meeting on General Relativity, edited by R. Ruffini (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982) p. 587

    work page 1982

  48. [52]

    A 3+1 perspective on null hypersurfaces and isolated horizons

    E. Gourgoulhon and J. L. Jaramillo, A 3+1 perspective on null hypersurfaces and isolated horizons, Phys. Rep.423, 159 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0503113 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [53]

    H´ a´ji˘ cek, Exact models of charged black holes

    P. H´ a´ji˘ cek, Exact models of charged black holes. I. Geometry of totally geodesic null hyper- surface, Commun. Math. Phys.34, 37 (1973)

    work page 1973

  50. [54]

    H´ a´ji˘ cek, Can outside fields destroy black holes?, J

    P. H´ a´ji˘ cek, Can outside fields destroy black holes?, J. Math. Phys.15, 1554 (1974)

    work page 1974

  51. [55]

    Isolated Horizons: Hamiltonian Evolution and the First Law

    A. Ashtekar, S. Fairhurst, and B. Krishnan, Isolated horizons: Hamiltonian evolution and the first law, Phys. Rev. D62, 104025 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0005083

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  52. [56]

    Geometry of Generic Isolated Horizons

    A. Ashtekar, C. Beetle, and J. Lewandowski, Geometry of generic isolated horizons, Class. Quantum Grav.19, 1195 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0111067

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  53. [57]

    H´ ajiˇ cek, Exact models of charged black holes: I

    P. H´ ajiˇ cek, Exact models of charged black holes: I. Geometry of totally geodesic null hyper- surface, Communications in Mathematical Physics34, 37 (1973)

    work page 1973

  54. [58]

    Szekeres, The gravitational compass, J

    P. Szekeres, The gravitational compass, J. Math. Phys.6, 1387 (1965)

    work page 1965

  55. [59]

    Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983)

    S. Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983)

    work page 1983

  56. [60]

    Ashtekar and S

    A. Ashtekar and S. Bahrami, Asymptotics with a positive cosmological constant. IV. The no-incoming radiation condition, Phys. Rev. D100, 024042 (2019), arXiv:1904.02822 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [61]

    Mechanics of Rotating Isolated Horizons

    A. Ashtekar, C. Beetle, and J. Lewandowski, Mechanics of rotating isolated horizons, Phys. Rev. D64, 044016 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  58. [62]

    A generalized Damour-Navier-Stokes equation applied to trapping horizons

    E. Gourgoulhon, Generalized Damour-Navier-Stokes equation applied to trapping horizons, Phys. Rev. D72, 104007 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0508003 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  59. [63]

    S. A. Hayward, Angular momentum conservation for dynamical black holes, Phys. Rev. D74, 104013 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0609008 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  60. [64]

    J. L. Jaramillo and E. Gourgoulhon, Mass and Angular Momentum in General Relativity, in Mass and Motion in General Relativity, edited by L. Blanchet, A. Spallicci, and B. Whiting (Springer, Dordrecht, 2011) pp. 87–124, arXiv:1001.5429 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  61. [65]

    Isolated and dynamical horizons and their applications

    A. Ashtekar and B. Krishnan, Isolated and Dynamical Horizons and Their Applications, Living Reviews in Relativity7, 10 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407042 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  62. [66]

    M. Korzy´ nski, Quasi-local angular momentum of non-symmetric isolated and dynamical hori- zons from the conformal decomposition of the metric, Classical and Quantum Gravity24, 5935 (2007), arXiv:0707.2824 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  63. [67]

    Chow, The Ricci flow on the 2-sphere, J

    B. Chow, The Ricci flow on the 2-sphere, J. Differ. Geom.33, 325 (1991)

    work page 1991

  64. [68]

    Rigid spheres in Riemannian spaces

    H.-P. Gittel, J. Jezierski, J. Kijowski, and S. Leski, Rigid spheres in Riemannian spaces, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 175010 (2013), arXiv:1206.6216 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [69]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Radiative gravitational fields in general relativityi. General structure of the field outside the source, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A320, 379 (1986)

    work page 1986

  66. [70]

    S. A. Teukolsky and W. H. Press, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. iii. interaction of the hole with gravitational and electromagnetic radiation, Astrophys. J.193, 443 (1974). 53

    work page 1974

  67. [71]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation(Freeman, New York, 1973)

    work page 1973

  68. [72]

    R. H. Boyer and R. W. Lindquist, Maximal analytic extension of the Kerr metric, J. Math. Phys.8, 265 (1967)

    work page 1967

  69. [73]

    S. W. Hawking and J. B. Hartle, Energy and angular momentum flow into a black hole, Commun. Math. Phys.27, 283 (1972)

    work page 1972

  70. [74]

    J. B. Hartle, Tidal shapes and shifts on rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D9, 2749 (1974)

    work page 1974

  71. [75]

    Absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole: Time-domain formalisms for gravitational perturbations, and the small-hole/slow-motion approximation

    E. Poisson, Absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole: Time-domain for- malisms for gravitational perturbations, and the small-hole or slow-motion approximation, Phys. Rev. D70, 084044 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407050

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  72. [76]

    Kinnersley, Type D vacuum metrics, J

    W. Kinnersley, Type D vacuum metrics, J. Math. Phys.10, 1195 (1969)

    work page 1969

  73. [77]

    Tidal coupling of a Schwarzschild black hole and circularly orbiting moon

    H. Fang and G. Lovelace, Tidal coupling of a Schwarzschild black hole and circularly orbiting moon, Phys. Rev. D72, 124016 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505156

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  74. [78]

    Smarr, Surface geometry of charged rotating black holes, Phys

    L. Smarr, Surface geometry of charged rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D7, 289 (1973)

    work page 1973

  75. [79]

    Le Tiec, M

    A. Le Tiec, M. Casals, and E. Franzin, Tidal Love numbers of Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D103, 084021 (2021), arXiv:2010.15795 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [80]

    Le Tiec and M

    A. Le Tiec and M. Casals, Spinning black holes fall in Love, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 131102 (2021), arXiv:2007.00214 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [81]

    On the gravitational polarizability of black holes

    T. Damour and O. M. Lecian, Gravitational polarizability of black holes, Phys. Rev. D80, 044017 (2009), arXiv:0906.3003 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  78. [82]

    Relativistic theory of surficial Love numbers

    P. Landry and E. Poisson, Relativistic theory of surficial Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D89, 124011 (2014), arXiv:1404.6798 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  79. [83]

    DLMF,NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov, Release 1.2.5 (2025), F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain, eds. [75]The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, published electronically at https://oeis.org ...

    work page 2025

  80. [84]

    The SageMath Developers, SageMath (2026), https://www.sagemath.org

    work page 2026

Showing first 80 references.