pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.08356 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-09 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · hep-ex· hep-lat· hep-th· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Search for the QCD Critical Point in High Energy Nuclear Collisions: A Status Report

Yu Zhang , Zhaohui Wang , Xiaofeng Luo , Nu Xu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 03:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex hep-exhep-lathep-thnucl-th
keywords QCD critical pointnet-proton cumulantsmultiplicity fluctuationsRHIC beam energy scanSTAR experimentheavy-ion collisionsvolume fluctuations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Net-proton cumulant ratios measured in RHIC Au+Au collisions are compared to non-critical models to search for the QCD critical point.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review assembles recent STAR data on net-proton multiplicity fluctuations from the RHIC beam energy scan phase II. It reports ratios of cumulants and factorial cumulants up to fourth order for both collider and fixed-target running modes. The measured ratios are placed next to predictions from lattice QCD, the hadron resonance gas model, hydrodynamic calculations, and the UrQMD transport model, none of which include critical-point effects. The work also examines how initial volume fluctuations affect the interpretation at lower energies and sketches experimental steps for future searches.

Core claim

The central claim is that higher-order net-proton cumulant ratios extracted from Au+Au collisions at RHIC energies provide a practical experimental handle on the QCD critical point when they are compared directly to baseline calculations that omit critical behavior. The paper supplies the latest data sets from BES-II in both collider and fixed-target configurations and shows how volume-fluctuation corrections alter the comparison at lower beam energies.

What carries the argument

Net-proton number cumulant ratios and proton number factorial cumulant ratios up to fourth order, compared against non-critical model baselines.

Load-bearing premise

Deviations between the measured cumulant ratios and the non-critical model predictions can be attributed to the influence of the QCD critical point rather than to unaccounted background effects or model shortcomings.

What would settle it

A full energy scan in which every measured cumulant ratio agrees with the non-critical model calculations within experimental uncertainties would indicate that the present data set does not yet reveal a critical-point signal.

read the original abstract

We review recent results of net-proton multiplicity fluctuations from STAR experiment, aiming to locate the QCD critical point in high-energy nuclear collisions at RHIC. We show net-proton number cumulant and proton number factorial cumulant ratios up to fourth order using experimental data from RHIC BES-II Au+Au collisions in collider mode and fixed-target mode. The comparison is made between experimental data and non-critical model calculations from Lattice QCD, HRG, hydrodynamic simulations and transport model UrQMD. In addition, we discuss initial volume fluctuation effect, which plays significant role in fixed-target energies. Finally, an outlook on experimental research on the QCD critical point in future experiments will be presented.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This status report reviews recent net-proton cumulant and factorial cumulant ratios (up to fourth order) extracted from STAR BES-II Au+Au data in both collider and fixed-target modes at RHIC. The data are compared directly to non-critical calculations from Lattice QCD, HRG, hydrodynamic models, and UrQMD; the manuscript additionally discusses the role of initial-volume fluctuations at fixed-target energies and provides an outlook for future experiments.

Significance. If the comparisons hold after uniform background corrections, the report supplies a timely synthesis of experimental constraints on the QCD critical point, underscoring the diagnostic value of higher-order cumulants while explicitly identifying volume-fluctuation systematics as a key limitation at lower energies.

major comments (2)
  1. [fixed-target energies section] In the fixed-target discussion: the text correctly flags initial-volume fluctuations as significant, yet provides no demonstration that Lattice QCD, HRG, hydrodynamics, and UrQMD calculations have been re-evaluated with identical acceptance, efficiency, and volume-fluctuation corrections applied to the data. Without this uniformity, residual deviations cannot be unambiguously attributed to critical-point physics rather than model-specific background mismatches.
  2. [comparison with non-critical models] In the model-comparison paragraphs: the interpretive step that any excess deviation signals proximity to the QCD critical point rests on the assumption that the chosen non-critical calculations already incorporate all relevant backgrounds (resonance feed-down, global baryon conservation, etc.) at data-level precision. The manuscript does not quantify the residual uncertainty from possible model deficiencies, which directly limits the diagnostic power of the presented ratios.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions should explicitly state which efficiency and acceptance corrections have been applied to each model curve so that readers can assess consistency with the data treatment.
  2. The outlook section would benefit from a concise table summarizing the key experimental observables and beam-energy ranges planned for next-generation facilities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our status report. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and rigor in the comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the fixed-target discussion: the text correctly flags initial-volume fluctuations as significant, yet provides no demonstration that Lattice QCD, HRG, hydrodynamics, and UrQMD calculations have been re-evaluated with identical acceptance, efficiency, and volume-fluctuation corrections applied to the data. Without this uniformity, residual deviations cannot be unambiguously attributed to critical-point physics rather than model-specific background mismatches.

    Authors: We agree that uniform corrections are essential to avoid model-specific mismatches. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the fixed-target section that explicitly describes the common acceptance cuts, efficiency corrections, and volume-fluctuation procedure applied consistently to the Lattice QCD, HRG, hydrodynamic, and UrQMD calculations to match the experimental conditions. This allows residual deviations to be discussed with greater confidence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: In the model-comparison paragraphs: the interpretive step that any excess deviation signals proximity to the QCD critical point rests on the assumption that the chosen non-critical calculations already incorporate all relevant backgrounds (resonance feed-down, global baryon conservation, etc.) at data-level precision. The manuscript does not quantify the residual uncertainty from possible model deficiencies, which directly limits the diagnostic power of the presented ratios.

    Authors: As a status report the manuscript does not claim discovery of the critical point but summarizes existing comparisons. We have revised the model-comparison paragraphs to state the key assumptions (resonance feed-down, global baryon conservation) and to include a qualitative discussion of possible model deficiencies together with their estimated impact on the cumulant ratios. Full quantitative uncertainty bands would require additional dedicated theoretical calculations that lie beyond the scope of the present review. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: status report presents external data comparisons without self-referential derivations

full rationale

This manuscript is a review summarizing net-proton cumulant ratios extracted from STAR BES-II Au+Au data (collider and fixed-target modes) and comparing them to independent calculations from Lattice QCD, HRG, hydrodynamics, and UrQMD. No derivation chain exists that reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to the paper's own inputs by construction. The discussion of initial-volume fluctuations and outlook sections reference external models and prior experimental results without fitting parameters to the presented data and then relabeling those fits as predictions. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any central claim; the paper's content remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The report rests on the standard assumption that net-proton cumulants are sensitive probes of the QCD critical point and that non-critical models provide reliable baselines.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Net-proton cumulants serve as reliable proxies for critical fluctuations in the QCD medium
    Invoked throughout the comparison of data to non-critical models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5425 in / 1138 out tokens · 60707 ms · 2026-05-16T03:57:35.859619+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Chiral first order phase transition at finite baryon density and zero temperature from self-consistent pole masses in the linear sigma model with quarks

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In the two-flavor linear sigma model with quarks, the chiral phase transition at T=0 is first order and occurs at a quark chemical potential equal to the vacuum quark mass.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics

    Aoki, Y., Endrodi, G., Fodor, Z., Katz, S.D., Szabo, K.K.: The Order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of par- ticle physics. Nature443, 675–678 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05120 arXiv:hep-lat/0611014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature05120 2006

  2. [2]

    Stephanov, M.A.: Non-Gaussian fluctuations near the QCD critical point. Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 032301 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.032301 arXiv:0809.3450 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.032301 2009

  3. [3]

    Asakawa, M., Ejiri, S., Kitazawa, M.: Third moments of conserved charges as probes of QCD phase structure. Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 262301 (2009) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.262301 arXiv:0904.2089 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.262301 2009

  4. [4]

    Stephanov, M.A.: On the sign of kurtosis near the QCD critical point. Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 052301 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.052301 arXiv:1104.1627 [hep-ph] 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.052301 2011

  5. [5]

    Bzdak, A., Esumi, S., Koch, V., Liao, J., Stephanov, M., Xu, N.: Map- ping the Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics with Beam Energy Scan. Phys. Rept.853, 1–87 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.01.005 arXiv:1906.00936 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.01.005 2020

  6. [6]

    Luo, X., Xu, N.: Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Con- served Quantities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC : An Overview. Nucl. Sci. Tech.28(8), 112 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0257-0 arXiv:1701.02105 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s41365-017-0257-0 2017

  7. [7]

    Pandav, A., Mallick, D., Mohanty, B.: Search for the QCD critical point in high energy nuclear collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.125, 103960 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103960 arXiv:2203.07817 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103960 2022

  8. [8]

    Braun-Munzinger, P., Rustamov, A., Xu, N.: The phase structure of QCD: Fluctuations and Correlations (2026) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-nucl-100324-014902 arXiv:2601.18666 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Ackermann, K.H.,et al.: STAR detector overview. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A499, 624–632 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01960-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(02)01960-5 2003

  10. [10]

    Aggarwal, M.M.,et al.: Higher Moments of Net-proton Multiplicity Distribu- tions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 022302 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.105.022302 arXiv:1004.4959 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Adamczyk, L.,et al.: Energy Dependence of Moments of Net-proton Multiplicity Distributions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 032302 (2014) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.112.032302 arXiv:1309.5681 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Adam, J.,et al.: Nonmonotonic Energy Dependence of Net-Proton Number Fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Lett.126(9), 092301 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.134.139902 arXiv:2001.02852 [nucl-ex]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 134, 139902 (2025)]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Abdallah, M.,et al.: Cumulants and correlation functions of net-proton, pro- ton, and antiproton multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. C104(2), 024902 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024902 arXiv:2101.12413 [nucl-ex]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 111, 029902 (2025)]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.024902 2021

  14. [14]

    Abdallah, M.,et al.: Measurement of the Sixth-Order Cumulant of Net-Proton Multiplicity Distributions in Au+Au Collisions at √sN N = 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett.127(26), 262301 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.127.262301 arXiv:2105.14698 [nucl-ex]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 134, 139903 (2025)]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Aboona, B.,et al.: Beam Energy Dependence of Fifth and Sixth-Order 11 Net-proton Number Fluctuations in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett.130(8), 082301 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.082301 arXiv:2207.09837 [nucl-ex]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 134, 139901 (2025)]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.082301 2023

  16. [16]

    Abdallah, M.S.,et al.: Measurements of Proton High Order Cumulants in √sNN = 3 GeV Au+Au Collisions and Implications for the QCD Critical Point. Phys. Rev. Lett.128(20), 202303 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.202303 arXiv:2112.00240 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.202303 2022

  17. [17]

    Abdallah, M.,et al.: Higher-order cumulants and correlation functions of pro- ton multiplicity distributions in sNN=3 GeV Au+Au collisions at the RHIC STAR experiment. Phys. Rev. C107(2), 024908 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.107.024908 arXiv:2209.11940 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Fraga, E.S., Palhares, L.F., Sorensen, P.: Finite-size scaling as a tool in the search for the QCD critical point in heavy ion data. Phys. Rev. C84, 011903 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.011903 arXiv:1104.3755 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.011903 2011

  19. [19]

    Sorensen, A., Koch, V.: Phase transitions and critical behavior in hadronic trans- port with a relativistic density functional equation of state. Phys. Rev. C104(3), 034904 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.034904 arXiv:2011.06635 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.034904 2021

  20. [20]

    Sorensen, A., Sorensen, P.: Locating the critical point for the hadron to quark- gluon plasma phase transition from finite-size scaling of proton cumulants in heavy-ion collisions (2024) arXiv:2405.10278 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Fu, W.-j., Pawlowski, J.M., Rennecke, F.: QCD phase structure at finite temper- ature and density. Phys. Rev. D101(5), 054032 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.101.054032 arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Gao, F., Pawlowski, J.M.: Chiral phase structure and critical end point in QCD. Phys. Lett. B820, 136584 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136584 arXiv:2010.13705 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136584 2021

  23. [23]

    Gunkel, P.J., Fischer, C.S.: Locating the critical endpoint of QCD: Mesonic back- coupling effects. Phys. Rev. D104(5), 054022 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.054022 arXiv:2106.08356 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Fu, W.-j., Luo, X., Pawlowski, J.M., Rennecke, F., Yin, S.: Ripples of the QCD critical point. Phys. Rev. D111(3), 031502 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.111.L031502 arXiv:2308.15508 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Lu, Y., Gao, F., Liu, Y.-x., Pawlowski, J.M.: Finite density signatures of confin- ing and chiral dynamics in QCD thermodynamics and fluctuations of conserved charges (2025) arXiv:2504.05099 [hep-ph] 12

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Cai, R.-G., He, S., Li, L., Wang, Y.-X.: Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics. Phys. Rev. D106(12), 121902 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L121902 arXiv:2201.02004 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.l121902 2022

  27. [27]

    Hippert, M., Grefa, J., Manning, T.A., Noronha, J., Noronha-Hostler, J., Por- tillo Vazquez, I., Ratti, C., Rougemont, R., Trujillo, M.: Bayesian location of the QCD critical point from a holographic perspective. Phys. Rev. D110(9), 094006 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094006 arXiv:2309.00579 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.094006 2024

  28. [28]

    Zhu, L., Chen, X., Zhou, K., Zhang, H., Huang, M.: Bayesian inference of the critical end point in a (2+1)-flavor system from holographic QCD. Phys. Rev. D 112(2), 026019 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/wpts-lbtr arXiv:2501.17763 [hep- ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/wpts-lbtr 2025

  29. [29]

    Basar, G.: QCD critical point, Lee-Yang edge singularities, and Pad´ e resumma- tions. Phys. Rev. C110(1), 015203 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 110.015203 arXiv:2312.06952 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc 2024

  30. [30]

    Clarke, D.A., Dimopoulos, P., Di Renzo, F., Goswami, J., Schmidt, C., Singh, S., Zambello, K.: Searching for the QCD critical endpoint using multi-point Pad´ e approximations (2024) arXiv:2405.10196 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Wan, Z.-y., Lu, Y., Gao, F., Liu, Y.-x.: Lee Yang edge singularities of QCD in association with the Roberge-Weiss and chiral phase transitions. Phys. Rev. D112(9), 094007 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/p7y6-hq15 arXiv:2504.12964 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/p7y6-hq15 2025

  32. [32]

    Li, Z., Xu, K., Wang, X., Huang, M.: The kurtosis of net baryon number fluctuations from a realistic Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model along the experimental freeze-out line. Eur. Phys. J. C79(3), 245 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6703-x arXiv:1801.09215 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6703-x 2019

  33. [33]

    Shah, H., Hippert, M., Noronha, J., Ratti, C., Vovchenko, V.: Locating the QCD critical point from first principles through contours of constant entropy density (2024) arXiv:2410.16206 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Jokela, N., J¨ arvinen, M., Piispa, A.: Refining holographic models of the quark- gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. D110(12), 126013 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.110.126013 arXiv:2405.02394 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Ecker, C., Jokela, N., J¨ arvinen, M.: Locating the QCD critical point with neutron- star observations (2025) arXiv:2506.10065 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Adamczyk, L.,et al.: Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program. Phys. Rev. C96(4), 044904 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044904 arXiv:1701.07065 13 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.044904 2017

  37. [37]

    Chen, J.,et al.: Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program. Nucl. Sci. Tech.35(12), 214 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01591-2 arXiv:2407.02935 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01591-2 2024

  38. [38]

    Meehan, K.C.: The fixed-target experiment at STAR. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.742(1), 012022 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/742/1/012022

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/742/1/012022 2016

  39. [39]

    Kitazawa, M., Asakawa, M.: Revealing baryon number fluctuations from proton number fluctuations in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C85, 021901 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.021901 arXiv:1107.2755 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.85.021901 2012

  40. [40]

    Kitazawa, M., Asakawa, M.: Relation between baryon number fluctuations and experimentally observed proton number fluctuations in relativistic heavy ion col- lisions. Phys. Rev. C86, 024904 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86. 024904 arXiv:1205.3292 [nucl-th]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 86, 069902 (2012)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.86 2012

  41. [41]

    Gavai, R.V., Gupta, S.: Lattice QCD predictions for shapes of event distributions along the freezeout curve in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B696, 459–463 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.01.006 arXiv:1001.3796 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.01.006 2011

  42. [42]

    Scale for the Phase Diagram of Quantum Chromodynamics

    Gupta, S., Luo, X., Mohanty, B., Ritter, H.G., Xu, N.: Scale for the Phase Diagram of Quantum Chromodynamics. Science332, 1525–1528 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1204621 arXiv:1105.3934 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1126/science.1204621 2011

  43. [43]

    Karsch, F., Redlich, K.: Probing freeze-out conditions in heavy ion collisions with moments of charge fluctuations. Phys. Lett. B695, 136–142 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.10.046 arXiv:1007.2581 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.10.046 2011

  44. [44]

    Garg, P., Mishra, D.K., Netrakanti, P.K., Mohanty, B., Mohanty, A.K., Singh, B.K., Xu, N.: Conserved number fluctuations in a hadron resonance gas model. Phys. Lett. B726, 691–696 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.09. 019 arXiv:1304.7133 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.09 2013

  45. [45]

    Anderson, M.,et al.: The Star time projection chamber: A Unique tool for study- ing high multiplicity events at RHIC. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A499, 659–678 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01964-2 arXiv:nucl-ex/0301015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(02)01964-2 2003

  46. [46]

    Llope, W.J.: Multigap RPCs in the STAR experiment at RHIC. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A661, 110–113 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.07.086

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2010.07.086 2012

  47. [47]

    Miller, M.L., Reygers, K., Sanders, S.J., Steinberg, P.: Glauber modeling in high energy nuclear collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57, 205–243 (2007) https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123020 arXiv:nucl-ex/0701025 14

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123020 2007

  48. [48]

    https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/starnotes/public/sn0644

    Collaboration, S.: Technical Design Report for the iTPC Upgrade, STAR Note SN0644, 2015. https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/starnotes/public/sn0644

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Physics Program for the STAR/CBM eTOF Upgrade (2016) arXiv:1609.05102 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Adams, J.,et al.: The STAR Event Plane Detector. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A968, 163970 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.163970 arXiv:1912.05243 [physics.ins-det]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2020.163970 2020

  51. [51]

    Luo, X., Xu, J., Mohanty, B., Xu, N.: Volume fluctuation and auto-correlation effects in the moment analysis of net-proton multiplicity distributions in heavy- ion collisions. J. Phys. G40, 105104 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/ 40/10/105104 arXiv:1302.2332 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/ 2013

  52. [52]

    Nonaka, T., Kitazawa, M., Esumi, S.: More efficient formulas for efficiency cor- rection of cumulants and effect of using averaged efficiency. Phys. Rev. C95(6), 064912 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064912 arXiv:1702.07106 [physics.data-an]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 103, 029901 (2021)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.064912 2017

  53. [53]

    Luo, X., Nonaka, T.: Efficiency correction for cumulants of multiplicity distribu- tions based on track-by-track efficiency. Phys. Rev. C99(4), 044917 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044917 arXiv:1812.10303 [physics.data-an]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.044917 2019

  54. [54]

    Luo, X.: Unified description of efficiency correction and error estimation for moments of conserved quantities in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C91(3), 034907 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.059901 arXiv:1410.3914 [physics.data-an]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 94, 059901 (2016)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.059901 2015

  55. [55]

    Aboona, B.E.,et al.: Precision Measurement of Net-Proton-Number Fluctuations in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett.135(14), 142301 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1103/9l69-2d7p arXiv:2504.00817 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/9l69-2d7p 2025

  56. [56]

    Vovchenko, V., Koch, V., Shen, C.: Proton number cumulants and correlation functions in Au-Au collisions at sNN=7.7–200 GeV from hydrodynamics. Phys. Rev. C105(1), 014904 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014904 arXiv:2107.00163 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.014904 2022

  57. [57]

    Braun-Munzinger, P., Friman, B., Redlich, K., Rustamov, A., Stachel, J.: Rel- ativistic nuclear collisions: Establishing a non-critical baseline for fluctuation measurements. Nucl. Phys. A1008, 122141 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2021.122141 arXiv:2007.02463 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2021

  58. [58]

    Bass, S.A.,et al.: Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion colli- sions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.41, 255–369 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0146-6410(98)00058-1 arXiv:nucl-th/9803035 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  59. [59]

    Bleicher, M.,et al.: Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model. J. Phys. G25, 1859–1896 (1999) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308 arXiv:hep-ph/9909407

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308 1999

  60. [61]

    Bollweg, D., Ding, H.-T., Goswami, J., Karsch, F., Mukherjee, S., Petreczky, P., Schmidt, C.: Strangeness-correlations on the pseudocritical line in (2+1)-flavor QCD. Phys. Rev. D110(5), 054519 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 110.054519 arXiv:2407.09335 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2024

  61. [62]

    Friman, B., Redlich, K., Rustamov, A.: Baselines for Abelian Charge Fluctuations in Nuclear Collisions:Theory and Comparison with Experimental Data (2025) arXiv:2508.18879 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [63]

    https://doi.org/https://indico.cern.ch/ event/1334113/contributions/6369534/attachments/3048338/5386843/ QM2025 Sweger v64.pdf

    Z.S.: STAR talk at QM2025. https://doi.org/https://indico.cern.ch/ event/1334113/contributions/6369534/attachments/3048338/5386843/ QM2025 Sweger v64.pdf

    work page arXiv

  63. [64]

    Wang, Z., Luo, X.: A centrality-independent framework for revealing genuine higher-order cumulants in heavy-Ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B871, 139984 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139984 arXiv:2505.03666 [physics.data- an]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139984 2025

  64. [65]

    Skokov, V., Friman, B., Redlich, K.: Volume Fluctuations and Higher Order Cumulants of the Net Baryon Number. Phys. Rev. C88, 034911 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.034911 arXiv:1205.4756 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.034911 2013

  65. [66]

    Chatterjee, A., Zhang, Y., Zeng, J., Sahoo, N.R., Luo, X.: Effect of centrality selection on higher-order cumulants of net-proton multiplicity distributions in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C101(3), 034902 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034902 arXiv:1910.08004 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.034902 2020

  66. [67]

    Mackowiak-Pawlowska, M., Naskret, M., Gazdzicki, M.: Remarks on volume fluc- tuations in fixed-target heavy-ion experiments. Nucl. Phys. A1014, 122258 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122258 arXiv:2102.11186 [hep- ex]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122258 2021

  67. [68]

    Holzmann, R., Koch, V., Rustamov, A., Stroth, J.: Controlling volume fluctuations for studies of critical phenomena in nuclear collisions. Nucl. Phys. A1050, 122924 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122924 arXiv:2403.03598 [nucl-th] 16

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122924 2024

  68. [69]

    Ablyazimov, T.,et al.: Challenges in QCD matter physics –The scientific pro- gramme of the Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR. Eur. Phys. J. A53(3), 60 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12248-y arXiv:1607.01487 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12248-y 2017

  69. [70]

    Kekelidze, V.D.: Heavy Ion Collisions: Baryon Density Frontier. Phys. Part. Nucl. 49(4), 457–472 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779618040330

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063779618040330 2018

  70. [71]

    AAPPS Bull.32(1), 35 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s43673-022-00064-1 17

    Zhou, X., Yang, J.: Status of the high-intensity heavy-ion accelerator facility in China. AAPPS Bull.32(1), 35 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s43673-022-00064-1 17

    work page 2022