arxiv: 2602.12477 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-12 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Towards a complete scheme of cosmological neutrino self-interactions: Collision term for a wide range of mediator masses

Ivan P\'erez-Castro , Josue De-Santiago , Gabriela Garcia-Arroyo , Jorge Venzor , Abdel P\'erez-Lorenzana

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 01:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO

keywords neutrino self-interactionscosmological neutrinosBoltzmann hierarchycollision termscalar mediatormediator massnon-resonant scattering

0 comments

The pith

A unified collision term for neutrino self-interactions works across all scalar mediator masses by smoothly transitioning between light and heavy regimes as the universe cools.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a framework for the collision term in neutrino self-interactions that keeps both neutrino and mediator masses as free parameters within the Boltzmann hierarchy. Calculations cover Dirac and Majorana neutrinos as well as two mass eigenstates. For non-resonant cases the term exhibits a smooth transition between the light-mediator and heavy-mediator regimes as the universe expands and cools. This matters because standard heavy-mediator approximations break down at early times when temperatures exceed the mediator mass, forcing separate treatments; the new scheme avoids that switch. If adopted it supplies a single consistent description for testing neutrino self-interactions across cosmic epochs.

Core claim

We present a novel framework to obtain the neutrino-neutrino collision term within the Boltzmann hierarchy, incorporating both neutrino and mediator masses as free parameters. Our calculations encompass both Dirac-like and Majorana neutrinos and distinguish between two neutrino mass eigenstates. Our results show a smooth transition from the light to the heavy mediator approximation as the Universe cools down for non-resonant cases. Thus, for the widely studied heavy mediator, our new scheme eliminates the need to approximate at high redshifts when the temperature increases above the mediator mass, and it provides the tools to test the threshold of validity of the heavy mediator paradigm.

What carries the argument

The neutrino-neutrino collision term derived for arbitrary scalar mediator masses inside the Boltzmann hierarchy.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes non-resonant scattering with a scalar mediator.

What would settle it

A numerical evaluation of the new collision term at temperatures near the mediator mass that matches the known light-mediator limit for low mass and heavy-mediator limit for high mass while remaining continuous in between.

read the original abstract

Neutrino self-interactions (NSI) offer a potential pathway to address anomalies in standard cosmology and explain existing cosmological tensions. In this work, we present a novel framework to obtain the neutrino--neutrino collision term within the Boltzmann hierarchy, incorporating both neutrino and mediator masses as free parameters. Our calculations encompass both Dirac-like and Majorana neutrinos and distinguish between two neutrino mass eigenstates. This work provides a valuable tool for future analyses, should a NSI signal be detected. Remarkably, our results show a smooth transition from the light to the heavy mediator approximation as the Universe cools down for non-resonant cases. Thus, for the widely studied heavy mediator, our new scheme eliminates the need to approximate at high redshifts when the temperature increases above the mediator mass, and it provides the tools to test the threshold of validity of the heavy mediator paradigm. While this work focuses on NSI mediated by a scalar particle, the presented framework could be adapted to a broader range of neutrino NSI and possibly to warm dark matter self-interacting scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives a single collision term for neutrino self-interactions that keeps finite mediator and neutrino masses explicit and claims a smooth transition between light and heavy mediator regimes.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a general collision term for the Boltzmann hierarchy in neutrino self-interacting models. It treats mediator mass m_phi and neutrino masses as free parameters, covers both Dirac and Majorana neutrinos, and distinguishes two mass eigenstates. The authors start from the scalar mediator interaction Lagrangian and keep the full propagator without forcing the usual light-mediator or heavy-mediator limits. They report that the expression produces a smooth interpolation as the universe cools for non-resonant scattering, which removes the need to switch approximations at high redshift for the heavy-mediator case that is common in Hubble-tension studies. That interpolation is the actual new piece; prior literature handled the two limits separately. If the algebra is correct, the result is a practical calculational tool for anyone running NSI cosmologies where the mediator mass sits near the temperature scale at some epoch. The soft spot is that the abstract asserts the smooth transition without showing the integral steps, thermal averaging, or explicit checks against the known contact-interaction and t-channel limits. Any slip in the momentum integration or phase-space factors would appear precisely in the intermediate regime the paper wants to cover. The non-resonant scalar assumption is stated clearly, so the claim is scoped, but the lack of numerical validation or error estimates in the provided text leaves the central result unconfirmed. This is for cosmologists who already model neutrino self-interactions and need a single formula that works across mediator masses. A reader implementing the term for intermediate-mass cases would find it directly useful once the derivation is verified. I would send it to peer review so referees can check the integrals and the limiting cases.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a general expression for the neutrino-neutrino collision term in the Boltzmann hierarchy for scalar-mediated self-interactions, keeping both the mediator mass m_φ and neutrino masses as free parameters. It treats Dirac and Majorana cases separately, distinguishes two mass eigenstates, and claims that the resulting collision integral produces a smooth transition between the light-mediator (m_φ ≪ T) and heavy-mediator (m_φ ≫ T) regimes for non-resonant scattering as the universe cools, thereby removing the need to switch approximations at high redshift.

Significance. If the general collision term is algebraically consistent with the known limiting cases and the smooth transition is numerically validated, the framework would provide a practical tool for cosmological analyses of neutrino self-interactions across mediator-mass regimes. This would allow direct tests of the heavy-mediator paradigm's validity and could be extended to other interaction types.

major comments (1)

[Derivation of collision term (likely §3)] The central claim of a smooth transition rests on the general collision integral (built from the mediator propagator 1/(q² − m_φ²) and phase-space factors) recovering the standard contact-interaction and t-channel limits without discontinuities or spurious features in the T ∼ m_φ regime. No explicit algebraic reduction to these limits, error estimates, or numerical comparisons against literature expressions are shown, which is load-bearing for the abstract's assertion that 'results show' the transition.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Clarify the precise meaning of 'Dirac-like' neutrinos in the abstract and methods; the distinction from standard Dirac neutrinos should be stated explicitly.
[Results] The manuscript should include at least one figure or table demonstrating the numerical behavior of the collision term across the light-to-heavy transition for a benchmark parameter set.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the collision term's limiting behavior.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim of a smooth transition rests on the general collision integral (built from the mediator propagator 1/(q² − m_φ²) and phase-space factors) recovering the standard contact-interaction and t-channel limits without discontinuities or spurious features in the T ∼ m_φ regime. No explicit algebraic reduction to these limits, error estimates, or numerical comparisons against literature expressions are shown, which is load-bearing for the abstract's assertion that 'results show' the transition.

Authors: We agree that an explicit algebraic reduction and numerical validation are necessary to fully substantiate the smooth-transition claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated appendix deriving the exact reduction of the general collision integral to the light-mediator contact-interaction limit and the heavy-mediator t-channel limit, including the leading-order error terms. We will also include numerical plots comparing our expression to the standard approximations across the T ∼ m_φ transition region, confirming the absence of discontinuities for non-resonant scattering. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation from explicit Lagrangian yields independent general collision term

full rationale

The collision term is obtained directly from the interaction Lagrangian by retaining finite mediator mass m_φ and neutrino masses as free parameters, performing the phase-space integration for both Dirac and Majorana cases, and distinguishing mass eigenstates. The smooth transition between light-mediator (m_φ ≪ T) and heavy-mediator (m_φ ≫ T) regimes is a numerical or algebraic consequence of the single propagator 1/(q² − m_φ²) expression rather than a fitted parameter or imposed limit. No self-citation is load-bearing for the central result, no ansatz is smuggled via prior work, and the limiting cases are recovered by taking the appropriate m_φ → 0 or m_φ → ∞ limits inside the same integral. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on extending the standard Boltzmann collision integral to finite mediator mass while keeping the interaction Lagrangian fixed; the only free parameters introduced are the mediator mass and the two neutrino mass eigenvalues.

free parameters (2)

mediator mass m_phi
Kept as a free parameter to interpolate between light and heavy regimes.
neutrino mass eigenvalues
Two distinct mass eigenstates are treated as free parameters.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard Boltzmann hierarchy for neutrinos in FLRW metric
Invoked as the background equation set into which the new collision term is inserted.
domain assumption Scalar mediator with Yukawa-like coupling to neutrinos
The framework is stated to focus on scalar-mediated NSI.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 1412 out tokens · 86770 ms · 2026-05-16T01:51:14.554008+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

we present a novel framework to obtain the neutrino–neutrino collision term within the Boltzmann hierarchy, incorporating both neutrino and mediator masses as free parameters... Remarkably, our results show a smooth transition from the light to the heavy mediator approximation

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Neutrino self-interactions in post-reionization era: Lyman-$\alpha$, 21-cm and cross-spectra
astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Fisher forecasts indicate that Lyα-21cm cross-spectra with PUMA and CMB data can improve constraints on neutrino self-interaction strength G_eff by 1-2 orders of magnitude over CMB alone.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 16 internal anchors

[1]

Gelmini and M

G.B. Gelmini and M. Roncadelli,Left-handed neutrino mass scale and spontaneously broken lepton number,Phys. Lett. B99(1981) 411

work page 1981
[2]

Chikashige, R.N

Y. Chikashige, R.N. Mohapatra and R.D. Peccei,Are there real goldstone bosons associated with broken lepton number?,Phys. Lett. B98(1981) 265

work page 1981
[3]

Non standard neutrino interactions

O.G. Miranda and H. Nunokawa,Non-standard neutrino interactions: current status and future prospects,New J. Phys.17(2015) 095002 [1505.06254]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[4]

Chao, J.-G

W. Chao, J.-G. Jiang, X. Wang and X.-Y. Zhang,Direct detections of dark matter in the presence of non-standard neutrino interactions,JCAP2019(2019) 010 [1904.11214]

work page arXiv 2019
[5]

Dev, K.S

P.S.B. Dev, K.S. Babu, P.B. Denton, P.A.N. Machado, C.A. Arg¨ uelles, J.L. Barrow et al., Neutrino non-standard interactions: A status report,SciPost Phys. Proc.(2019) 001 [1907.00991]

work page arXiv 2019
[6]

Babu, P.B

K.S. Babu, P.B. Dev, S. Jana and A. Thapa,Non-standard interactions in radiative neutrino mass models,JHEP2020(2020) 6 [1907.09498]

work page arXiv 2020
[7]

Van Loi, P

D. Van Loi, P. Van Dong and D. Van Soa,Neutrino mass and dark matter from an approximate B-L symmetry,JHEP2020(2020) 90 [1911.04902]

work page arXiv 2020
[8]

Elliott, V

S. Elliott, V. Gavrin and W. Haxton,The gallium anomaly,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.134 (2024) 104082 [2306.03299]

work page arXiv 2024
[9]

Blinov, K.J

N. Blinov, K.J. Kelly, G. Krnjaic and S.D. McDermott,Constraining the self-interacting neutrino interpretation of the hubble tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 191102 [1905.02727]

work page arXiv 2019
[10]

Berryman, N

J.M. Berryman, N. Blinov, V. Brdar, T. Brinckmann, M. Bustamante, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine et al., Neutrino self-interactions: A white paper,Phys. Dark Univ.42(2023) 101267 [2203.01955]

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

N.F. Bell, E. Pierpaoli and K. Sigurdson,Cosmological signatures of interacting neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 063523

work page 2006
[12]

Limits on Neutrino-Neutrino Scattering in the Early Universe

F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and K. Sigurdson,Limits on neutrino-neutrino scattering in the early universe,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 123533 [1306.1536]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[13]

Updated constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions from Planck

M. Archidiacono and S. Hannestad,Updated constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions from planck,JCAP2014(2014) 046 [1311.3873]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[14]

Boltzmann hierarchy for interacting neutrinos I: formalism

I.M. Oldengott, C. Rampf and Y.Y. Wong,Boltzmann hierarchy for interacting neutrinos I: formalism,JCAP2015(2015) 016 [1409.1577]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[15]

A tale of two modes: Neutrino free-streaming in the early universe

L. Lancaster, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, L. Knox and Z. Pan,A tale of two modes: neutrino free-streaming in the early universe,JCAP2017(2017) 033 [1704.06657]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[16]

Interacting neutrinos in cosmology: exact description and constraints

I.M. Oldengott, T. Tram, C. Rampf and Y.Y. Wong,Interacting neutrinos in cosmology: exact description and constraints,JCAP2017(2017) 027 [1706.02123]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[17]

Park, C.D

M. Park, C.D. Kreisch, J. Dunkley, B. Hadzhiyska and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, ΛCDMor self-interacting neutrinos: How CMB data can tell the two models apart,Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 063524 [1904.02625]

work page arXiv 2019
[18]

Kreisch, F.-Y

C.D. Kreisch, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and O. Dor´ e,Neutrino puzzle: Anomalies, interactions, and cosmological tensions,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123505 [1902.00534]

work page arXiv 2020
[19]

Roy Choudhury, S

S. Roy Choudhury, S. Hannestad and T. Tram,Updated constraints on massive neutrino self-interactions from cosmology in light of theH 0 tension,JCAP2021(2021) 084 [2012.07519]. – 41 –

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Brinckmann, J.H

T. Brinckmann, J.H. Chang and M. LoVerde,Self-interacting neutrinos, the Hubble parameter tension, and the cosmic microwave background,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 063523 [2012.11830]

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

Mazumdar, S

A. Mazumdar, S. Mohanty and P. Parashari,Flavour specific neutrino self-interaction:H 0 tension and IceCube,JCAP2022(2022) 011 [2011.13685]

work page arXiv 2022
[22]

Kreisch et al.,Atacama Cosmology Telescope: The persistence of neutrino self-interaction in cosmological measurements,Phys

C.D. Kreisch et al.,Atacama Cosmology Telescope: The persistence of neutrino self-interaction in cosmological measurements,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 043501 [2207.03164]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

Roy Choudhury, S

S. Roy Choudhury, S. Hannestad and T. Tram,Massive neutrino self-interactions and inflation,JCAP10(2022) 018 [2207.07142]

work page arXiv 2022
[24]

Das and S

A. Das and S. Ghosh,The magnificent ACT of flavor-specific neutrino self-interaction,JCAP 09(2023) 042 [2303.08843]

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

Camarena, F.-Y

D. Camarena, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and J. Houghteling,Confronting self-interacting neutrinos with the full shape of the galaxy power spectrum,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 103535 [2309.03941]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

A. He, R. An, M.M. Ivanov and V. Gluscevic,Self-interacting neutrinos in light of large-scale structure data,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 103527 [2309.03956]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Camarena and F.-Y

D. Camarena and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine,Strong constraints on a simple self-interacting neutrino cosmology,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 023504 [2403.05496]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Poudou, T

A. Poudou, T. Simon, T. Montandon, E.M. Teixeira and V. Poulin,Self-interacting neutrinos in light of recent CMB and LSS data,Phys. Rev. D(2025) [2503.10485]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

A. He, M.M. Ivanov, S. Bird, R. An and V. Gluscevic,A Fresh Look at Neutrino Self-Interactions With the Lyman-αForest: Constraints from EFT and PRIYA,Phys. Rev. D (2025) [2503.15592]

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

Montefalcone, S

G. Montefalcone, S. Ghosh, K.K. Boddy, D.W.R. Ho and Y. Tsai,Directly probing neutrino interactions through CMB phase shift measurements,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 023540 [2509.20363]

work page arXiv 2026
[31]

Whitford, C

A.M. Whitford, C. Howlett, T.M. Davis, D. Camarena and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine,Limits on self-interacting neutrinos from the BAO and CMB phase shift,JCAP2026(2026) 064 [2511.00800]

work page arXiv 2026
[32]

Constraints on secret neutrino interactions after Planck

F. Forastieri, M. Lattanzi and P. Natoli,Constraints on secret neutrino interactions after Planck,JCAP07(2015) 014 [1504.04999]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[33]

Forastieri, M

F. Forastieri, M. Lattanzi and P. Natoli,Cosmological constraints on neutrino self-interactions with a light mediator,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 103526 [1904.07810]

work page arXiv 2019
[34]

Venzor, G

J. Venzor, G. Garcia-Arroyo, A. P´ erez-Lorenzana and J. De-Santiago,Massive neutrino self-interactions with a light mediator in cosmology,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 123539 [2202.09310]

work page arXiv 2022
[35]

Venzor, G

J. Venzor, G. Garcia-Arroyo, J. De-Santiago and A. P´ erez-Lorenzana,Resonant neutrino self-interactions and theH 0 tension,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 043536 [2303.12792]

work page arXiv 2023
[36]

Noriega, J

H.E. Noriega, J. De-Santiago, G. Garcia-Arroyo, J. Venzor and A. P´ erez-Lorenzana,Resonant neutrino self-interactions: Insights from the full shape galaxy power spectrum,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) 063509 [2506.07994]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Beacom, N.F

J.F. Beacom, N.F. Bell and S. Dodelson,Neutrinoless universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 121302

work page 2004
[38]

Hannestad,Structure formation with strongly interacting neutrinos—implications for the cosmological neutrino mass bound,JCAP2005(2005) 011

S. Hannestad,Structure formation with strongly interacting neutrinos—implications for the cosmological neutrino mass bound,JCAP2005(2005) 011. – 42 –

work page 2005
[39]

Supernova Constraints on Massive (Pseudo)Scalar Coupling to Neutrinos

L. Heurtier and Y. Zhang,Supernova constraints on massive (pseudo)scalar coupling to neutrinos,JCAP2017(2017) 042 [1609.05882]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[40]

Observational Constraints on Secret Neutrino Interactions from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

G.-y. Huang, T. Ohlsson and S. Zhou,Observational constraints on secret neutrino interactions from big bang nucleosynthesis,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 075009 [1712.04792]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[41]

Lepton-Number-Charged Scalars and Neutrino Beamstrahlung

J.M. Berryman, A. de Gouvˆ ea, K.J. Kelly and Y. Zhang,Lepton-number-charged scalars and neutrino beamstrahlung,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 075030 [1802.00009]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[42]

K. Blum, Y. Nir and M. Shavit,Neutrinoless double-beta decay with massive scalar emission, Phys. Lett. B785(2018) 354 [1802.08019]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[43]

Majoron Dark Matter and Constraints on the Majoron-Neutrino Coupling

T. Brune and H. P¨ as,Massive Majorons and constraints on the Majoron-neutrino coupling, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 96005 [1808.08158]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[44]

Inflation meets neutrinos

G. Barenboim, P.B. Denton and I.M. Oldengott,Constraints on inflation with an extended neutrino sector,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 083515 [1903.02036]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[45]

Sch¨ oneberg, J

N. Sch¨ oneberg, J. Lesgourgues and D.C. Hooper,The BAO+BBN take on the Hubble tension, JCAP2019(2019) 029 [1907.11594]

work page arXiv 2019
[46]

Escudero and S.J

M. Escudero and S.J. Witte,A CMB search for the neutrino mass mechanism and its relation to the Hubble tension,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 294 [1909.04044]

work page arXiv 2020
[47]

Chacko, A

Z. Chacko, A. Dev, P. Du, V. Poulin and Y. Tsai,Cosmological limits on the neutrino mass and lifetime,JHEP2020(2020) 20 [1909.05275]

work page arXiv 2020
[48]

Bustamante, C

M. Bustamante, C. Rosenstrøm, S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra,Bounds on secret neutrino interactions from high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123024 [2001.04994]

work page arXiv 2020
[49]

Brdar, M

V. Brdar, M. Lindner, S. Vogl and X.-J. Xu,Revisiting neutrino self-interaction constraints fromZandτdecays,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 115001 [2003.05339]

work page arXiv 2020
[50]

Deppisch, L

F.F. Deppisch, L. Graf, W. Rodejohann and X.-J. Xu,Neutrino self-interactions and double beta decay,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 051701 [2004.11919]

work page arXiv 2020
[51]

Escudero, J

M. Escudero, J. Lopez-Pavon, N. Rius and S. Sandner,Relaxing cosmological neutrino mass bounds with unstable neutrinos,JHEP2020(2020) 119 [2007.04994]

work page arXiv 2020
[52]

Shalgar, I

S. Shalgar, I. Tamborra and M. Bustamante,Core-collapse supernova stymie secret neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 123008 [1912.09115]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

K.-F. Lyu, E. Stamou and L.-T. Wang,Self-interacting neutrinos: Solution to hubble tension versus experimental constraints,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 015004 [2004.10868]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

Creque-Sarbinowski, J

C. Creque-Sarbinowski, J. Hyde and M. Kamionkowski,Resonant neutrino self-interactions, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 023527 [2005.05332]

work page arXiv 2021
[55]

Venzor, A

J. Venzor, A. P´ erez-Lorenzana and J. De-Santiago,Bounds on neutrino-scalar nonstandard interactions from big bang nucleosynthesis,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043534 [2009.08104]

work page arXiv 2021
[56]

Suliga and I

A.M. Suliga and I. Tamborra,Astrophysical constraints on nonstandard coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 083002 [2010.14545]

work page arXiv 2021
[57]

Barenboim, J.Z

G. Barenboim, J.Z. Chen, S. Hannestad, I.M. Oldengott, T. Tram and Y.Y. Wong,Invisible neutrino decay in precision cosmology,JCAP2021(2021) 087 [2011.01502]

work page arXiv 2021
[58]

Das and S

A. Das and S. Ghosh,Flavor-specific interaction favors strong neutrino self-coupling in the early universe,JCAP2021(2021) 038 [2011.12315]

work page arXiv 2021
[59]

Seto and Y

O. Seto and Y. Toda,Comparing early dark energy and extra radiation solutions to the Hubble tension with BBN,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 123501 [2101.03740]

work page arXiv 2021
[60]

Esteban and J

I. Esteban and J. Salvado,Long range interactions in cosmology: implications for neutrinos, JCAP2021(2021) 036 [2101.05804]. – 43 –

work page arXiv 2021
[61]

Escrihuela, L.J

F.J. Escrihuela, L.J. Flores, O.G. Miranda and J. Rend´ on,Global constraints on neutral-current generalized neutrino interactions,JHEP07(2021) 061 [2105.06484]

work page arXiv 2021
[62]

Cerde˜ no, M

D.G. Cerde˜ no, M. Cerme˜ no, M.A. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa and E. Reid,Medium effects in supernovae constraints on light mediators,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 063013 [2106.11660]

work page arXiv 2021
[63]

Esteban, S

I. Esteban, S. Pandey, V. Brdar and J.F. Beacom,Probing secret interactions of astrophysical neutrinos in the high-statistics era,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123014 [2107.13568]

work page arXiv 2021
[64]

Ge and P

S.-F. Ge and P. Pasquini,Probing light mediators in the radiative emission of neutrino pair, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 208 [2110.03510]

work page arXiv 2022
[65]

Medhi, D

A. Medhi, D. Dutta and M.M. Devi,Exploring the effects of scalar non standard interactions on the CP violation sensitivity at DUNE,JHEP06(2022) 129 [2111.12943]

work page arXiv 2022
[66]

Abell´ an, Z

G.F. Abell´ an, Z. Chacko, A. Dev, P. Du, V. Poulin and Y. Tsai,Improved cosmological constraints on the neutrino mass and lifetime,JHEP2022(2022) 76 [2112.13862]

work page arXiv 2022
[67]

Chen, I.M

J.Z. Chen, I.M. Oldengott, G. Pierobon and Y.Y. Wong,Weaker yet again: mass spectrum-consistent cosmological constraints on the neutrino lifetime,Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 640 [2203.09075]

work page arXiv 2022
[68]

Kumar, R.C

S. Kumar, R.C. Nunes and P. Yadav,Updating non-standard neutrinos properties with Planck-CMB data and full-shape analysis of BOSS and eBOSS galaxies,JCAP2022(2022) 060 [2205.04292]

work page arXiv 2022
[69]

Akita, S.H

K. Akita, S.H. Im and M. Masud,Probing non-standard neutrino interactions with a light boson from next galactic and diffuse supernova neutrinos,JHEP2022(2022) 50 [2206.06852]

work page arXiv 2022
[70]

Chang, I

P.-W. Chang, I. Esteban, J.F. Beacom, T.A. Thompson and C.M. Hirata,Toward powerful probes of neutrino self-interactions in supernovae,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 071002 [2206.12426]

work page arXiv 2023
[71]

Fiorillo, G.G

D.F.G. Fiorillo, G.G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Strong supernova 1987a constraints on bosons decaying to neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 021001 [2209.11773]

work page arXiv 2023
[72]

Dutta, S

B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, T. Li, A. Thompson and A. Verma,Non-standard neutrino interactions in light mediator models at reactor experiments,JHEP2023(2023) 163 [2209.13566]

work page arXiv 2023
[73]

Cerde˜ no, M

D. Cerde˜ no, M. Cerme˜ no and Y. Farzan,Constraints from the duration of supernova neutrino burst on on-shell light gauge boson production by neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 123012 [2301.00661]

work page arXiv 2023
[74]

D¨ oring and S

C. D¨ oring and S. Vogl,Testing secret interaction with astrophysical neutrino point sources, JCAP2024(2024) 015 [2304.08533]

work page arXiv 2024
[75]

Sandner, M

S. Sandner, M. Escudero and S.J. Witte,Precision CMB constraints on eV-scale bosons coupled to neutrinos,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 709 [2305.01692]

work page arXiv 2023
[76]

Fiorillo, G.G

D.F.G. Fiorillo, G.G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Supernova emission of secretly interacting neutrino fluid: Theoretical foundations,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023017 [2307.15122]

work page arXiv 2024
[77]

Fiorillo, G.G

D.F.G. Fiorillo, G.G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Large neutrino secret interactions have a small impact on supernovae,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 021002 [2307.15115]

work page arXiv 2024
[78]

Bostan and S.R

N. Bostan and S.R. Choudhury,First constraints on non-minimally coupled natural and coleman-weinberg inflation and massive neutrino self-interactions with planck+bicep/keck, JCAP2024(2024) 032 [2310.01491]

work page arXiv 2024
[80]

Medhi, A

A. Medhi, A. Sarker and M.M. Devi,Scalar NSI: a unique tool for constraining absolute neutrino masses via neutrino oscillations,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 380 [2307.05348]. – 44 –

work page arXiv 2025
[81]

P.B. Dev, D. Kim, D. Sathyan, K. Sinha and Y. Zhang,New laboratory constraints on neutrinophilic mediators,Phys. Lett. B(2025) 139765 [2407.12738]

work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.