Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Low-altitude airspace needs Height Above Ellipsoid as its single vertical reference so that autonomous craft can safely share denser layers.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-15 14:57 UTC pith:B32YQHRP

load-bearing objection Useful engineering proposal for HAE as low-altitude standard, with concrete Shenzhen zoning and PX4-driven capacity numbers, but the 5–8× gains rest on an optimistic urban GNSS error assumption the paper itself flags as open. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.04865 v4 pith:B32YQHRP submitted 2026-03-05 cs.SD

The First Environmental Sound Deepfake Detection Challenge: Benchmarking Robustness, Evaluation, and Insights

Han Yin , Yang Xiao , Rohan Kumar Das , Jisheng Bai , Ting Dang This is my paper
classification cs.SD
keywords Height Above Ellipsoidlow-altitude economyadvanced air mobilityvertical separation minimumUAS traffic managementGNSS heightairspace capacity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Manned aviation, maps and obstacle rules still measure height with three incompatible systems—barometric pressure, mean sea level and height above ground—creating ambiguity that blocks dense urban drone and eVTOL traffic. The authors argue that Height Above Ellipsoid (HAE), the geometric height already delivered by everyday GNSS receivers, is the only reference that is globally consistent, digitally native and free of weather or terrain drift. They supply a bidirectional conversion toolkit so legacy QNH, MSL and AGL values can still be used, then demonstrate the practical payoff in two Shenzhen case studies. Empirical error distributions taken from real PX4 flight logs show that HAE’s centimetre-scale stability lets the required vertical separation drop from roughly 32 m to 6 m while still meeting a 10^{-9} collision-risk target, unlocking five times more flight levels and an eight-fold rise in hourly throughput. The result is a concrete roadmap for turning lower airspace into scalable digital infrastructure rather than a scarce, uncertain resource.

Core claim

When vertical position error is taken from real multicopter logs, the Reich collision-risk model requires a 32 m separation for barometric height but only 6 m for GNSS-derived HAE to keep the probability of vertical overlap below 10^{-9}; inside a 1 000 m ceiling that change raises usable flight levels from 31 to 166 and, under an Erlang-B model, raises sustainable traffic from 294 to 2 354 flights per hour before a 5 % blocking probability is reached.

What carries the argument

The bidirectional HAE conversion framework (forward models that map AGL/MSL/Q-codes onto the WGS84 ellipsoid and backward models that restore legacy numbers) plus the empirical error extraction from PX4 RTK and EPV logs that feed the Reich and Erlang-B calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The paper treats the vertical error reported by consumer GNSS under open-sky conditions as a realistic proxy for the same receivers flying in multipath-heavy urban canyons; if city clutter inflates that error toward the barometric figure, the claimed separation and capacity gains disappear.

What would settle it

Re-process the same PX4 log pipeline on flights conducted under dense urban multipath or intentional GNSS degradation and recompute the Reich VSM; if the HAE standard deviation rises above ~1 m the 6 m separation and eight-fold capacity claims no longer hold.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Regulators can publish simple HAE height ceilings for uncontrolled airspace without releasing sensitive terrain models.
  • UTM systems gain a single numeric language for de-confliction across drones, eVTOLs and legacy helicopters.
  • Airspace capacity becomes an engineered quantity rather than a weather-dependent guess, supporting denser logistics corridors.
  • Existing barometric altimeters remain usable via the supplied conversion layer, so operators need not scrap current fleets overnight.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If urban multipath proves manageable with multi-frequency or dual-antenna GNSS, the same VSM compression could be applied to manned general aviation above 1 000 m, potentially rewriting RVSM rules.
  • Crowdsourced pairwise barometric-versus-HAE measurements collected by delivery drones could automatically generate dense local calibration tables, closing the last empirical gap the authors flag.
  • Once HAE polygons become the official publication format, digital twins of cities can treat vertical airspace as ordinary 3-D GIS layers rather than special-case aviation objects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that fragmented vertical references (barometric Q-codes, MSL/orthometric, AGL) impede safe, scalable low-altitude economy operations for UAVs and eVTOLs. It proposes Height Above Ellipsoid (HAE) as the GNSS-native standard, supplies a bidirectional transformation framework for legacy compatibility, and validates the idea via (1) a DEM-clustering partitioned airspace scheme for Shenzhen and (2) a probabilistic safety/capacity analysis. Using PX4 flight-log error statistics, the Reich collision-risk model and Erlang-B, it claims that HAE compresses the vertical separation minimum from ~32 m to 6 m (TLS 10^{-9}), raising static usable levels from 31 to 166 inside a 1 000 m ceiling and dynamic throughput from 294 to 2 354 flights/h before 5 % blocking.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold under realistic urban conditions, the work supplies a concrete, policy-relevant roadmap that converts an analog height-keeping problem into a digital-native standard, with direct implications for UTM capacity, regulatory zoning and cross-stakeholder interoperability. Strengths include transparent use of classical risk models, real PX4 logs for empirical sigmas, an explicit conversion framework that preserves backward compatibility, and a practical Shenzhen zoning workflow that avoids disclosure of sensitive DTM data. These elements make the proposal more actionable than purely conceptual height-system surveys.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section V-B.1 and V-B.2, Eqs. (1)–(2), Figs. 11–13] Section V-B.1 (GNSS HAE Error Modeling) and the subsequent Reich/Erlang-B calculations: the headline capacity gains (VSM 6 m, 166 levels, 2 354 flights/h) rest entirely on treating the PX4 Estimated Position Error Vertical (EPV) under good satellite visibility (σ_HAE ≈ 0.53 m) as the operational vertical uncertainty of consumer-grade GNSS HAE. No independent urban multipath, canyon or jamming characterization is supplied, even though these environments dominate the target low-altitude domain. Section VI itself flags the issue as open future work. Without a sensitivity study (e.g., σ_HAE = 1–2 m) or urban flight-log validation, the claimed 5.3 imes static and 8 imes dynamic improvements are not yet substantiated for the operational setting the paper addresses.
  2. [Section V-B.2, Eq. (2)] Section V-B.2, Eq. (2): the mapping TLS = 10^{-9} o λ ≈ 5.3 and S = λ √2 σ assumes a specific (implicitly Gaussian, independent) form of the vertical-error PDF. The empirical residual histograms in Fig. 11 should be tested for consistency with that assumption, and the precise ICAO Doc / Reich derivation that yields λ = 5.3 should be cited more carefully so that the numerical VSM values can be reproduced or challenged.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout, especially Figs. 11–13 and surrounding text] Numerous OCR/extraction artifacts appear throughout (e.g., “h     ”, “σ      3.98 m”, garbled figure captions). These should be cleaned for readability.
  2. [Table I, Fig. 3] Table I and Fig. 3 report pressure statistics in hPa yet the caption of Table I states “ALL VALUES ARE IN METERS”—a clear unit inconsistency.
  3. [Section II-E, Tables II–III] The comparison radar chart (Fig. 1) and the DEM difference statistics (Tables II–III) are useful but lack error bars or confidence intervals; a short note on data provenance would help.
  4. [Sections III–IV] Minor typographical issues: “de-facto”, “Q-codes heights”, repeated “the the”, and inconsistent hyphenation of “low-altitude” / “low altitude”.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; VSM and capacity claims follow from independent PX4 empirical errors plugged into classical Reich/Erlang-B formulas.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing numerical claim (VSM compressed from ~32 m to 6 m, static levels 31 o166, dynamic throughput ~294 o2354 flights/h) is obtained by (1) extracting residual barometric error σ_baro≈3.98 m and GNSS EPV σ_HAE≈0.53 m directly from public PX4 flight logs against RTK ground truth (Section V-B.1), then (2) inserting those measured sigmas into the standard Reich overlap formula with a fixed TLS-derived safety factor λ≈5.3 (Eq. 2) and the Erlang-B blocking model (Eq. 3). Neither sigma is a free parameter fitted to the capacity numbers themselves, nor is the Reich or Erlang-B algebra redefined in terms of the desired outcome. Self-citations ([1], [28]) supply only policy motivation for the low-altitude economy and do not supply numerical inputs or uniqueness theorems that force the result. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external data and classical models; any remaining concern (EPV as urban multipath proxy) is an empirical validity issue, not circularity by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central capacity claim rests on three empirical numbers extracted from PX4 logs, two classical risk models treated as domain axioms, and the modelling choice that EPV equals operational HAE uncertainty. No new physical entities are invented; the free parameters are the measured sigmas and the safety-factor λ.

free parameters (4)
  • sigma_baro = ≈ 3.98 m
    Standard deviation of residual barometric error after QNH bias removal, measured on PX4 logs and used to set VSM = λ√2 σ.
  • sigma_HAE = ≈ 0.53 m
    Standard deviation taken from PX4 EPV reports and used as the HAE uncertainty for the same VSM formula.
  • lambda_TLS = 5.3
    Safety factor that converts a chosen Target Level of Safety (10^{-9}) into the multiplier for vertical separation; taken from ICAO Doc 9574 practice.
  • QoS_blocking = 5 %
    Maximum acceptable Erlang-B blocking probability that defines the capacity limit.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Reich collision-risk model (probability of vertical overlap) remains valid for dense, low-altitude, non-en-route traffic.
    Imported from ICAO long-range separation standards and applied without re-derivation to the 0–1 000 m regime (Section V-B.2).
  • domain assumption Erlang-B loss formula correctly models airspace layers as independent servers and missions as Poisson arrivals.
    Standard telecommunications analogy adopted without low-altitude traffic validation (Section V-B.3).
  • ad hoc to paper Consumer GNSS EPV under open-sky conditions is a sufficient statistic for operational HAE error in urban canyons.
    Explicit modelling choice in Section V-B.1; the paper itself later lists multipath as an open problem.
  • domain assumption Geoid models (EGM96/EGM2008) and DEM-to-HAE conversions introduce negligible additional error relative to the sensor sigmas.
    Used throughout the conversion framework (Section IV-C) without quantified residual budgets.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 24415 in / 3226 out tokens · 46573 ms · 2026-07-15T14:57:04.265850+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent progress in audio generation has made it increasingly easy to create highly realistic environmental soundscapes, which can be misused to produce deceptive content, such as fake alarms, gunshots, and crowd sounds, raising concerns for public safety and trust. While deepfake detection for speech and singing voice has been extensively studied, environmental sound deepfake detection (ESDD) remains underexplored. To advance ESDD, the first edition of the ESDD challenge was launched, attracting 97 registered teams and receiving 1,748 valid submissions. This paper presents the task formulation, dataset construction, evaluation protocols, baseline systems, and key insights from the challenge results. Furthermore, we analyze common architectural choices and training strategies among top-performing systems. Finally, we discuss potential future research directions for ESDD, outlining key opportunities and open problems to guide subsequent studies in this field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Overview of ESDD2: Environment-Aware Speech and Sound Deepfake Detection Challenge

    cs.SD 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The ESDD2 challenge evaluated 13 teams on component-level audio spoofing detection, with the top system reaching 0.8775 Macro-F1 by using modular decomposition, self-supervised encoders, and targeted augmentation.

  2. Overview of ESDD2: Environment-Aware Speech and Sound Deepfake Detection Challenge

    cs.SD 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    ESDD2 challenge overview reports top Macro-F1 of 0.8775 from 13 teams using modular designs and self-supervised encoders, with noted difficulties on environmental sounds and unseen generators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    White paper: Low altitude economic development - the shenzhen solution,

    H. Shum, S. P. Li, M. Li, Z. Q. Liu, Y . Q. Tang, and el. al., “White paper: Low altitude economic development - the shenzhen solution,” Lower AirSpace Economy Research Institute (LASER), International Digital Economy Academy (IDEA), CFC Building, 5 Shihua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, China, Tech. Rep., November 2022. [Online]. Available: www.idea.edu.cn

    2022

  2. [2]

    U-space concept of operations (conops) - 4th edition,

    SESAR Joint Undertaking, “U-space concept of operations (conops) - 4th edition,” SESAR Joint Undertaking, Tech. Rep., 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sesarju.eu/sites/default/files/ documents/reports/U-space%20CONOPS%204th%20edition.pdf

    2024

  3. [3]

    Designing airspace for urban air mobility: A review of concepts and approaches,

    A. Bauranov and J. Rakas, “Designing airspace for urban air mobility: A review of concepts and approaches,”Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 125, p. 100726, 2021. [4]A proposed taxonomy for advanced air mobility, 2022

    2021

  4. [4]

    On the understanding of the current status of urban air mobility development and its future prospects: Commuting in a flying vehicle as a new paradigm,

    J. Pons-Prats, T. ˇZivojinovi´c, and J. Kuljanin, “On the understanding of the current status of urban air mobility development and its future prospects: Commuting in a flying vehicle as a new paradigm,”Trans- portation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 166, p. 102868, 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    A survey on the unmanned aircraft system traffic management,

    A. Hamissi and A. Dhraief, “A survey on the unmanned aircraft system traffic management,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1–37, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    The impact of civil airspace policies on the viability of adopting autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles in last-mile applications,

    M. ElSayed, A. Foda, and M. Mohamed, “The impact of civil airspace policies on the viability of adopting autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles in last-mile applications,”Transport Policy, vol. 145, pp. 37–54, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Views on the study of low-altitude airspace resources for uav applications,

    X. Liao, Y . Huan, and C. Xu, “Views on the study of low-altitude airspace resources for uav applications,”Acta Geographica Sinica, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 2607–2620, 2021

    2021

  8. [8]

    A review of urban air mobility and its new infrastructure low-altitude public routes,

    X. Liao, W. Qu, C. Xu, H. He, J. Wang, and W. Shi, “A review of urban air mobility and its new infrastructure low-altitude public routes,”Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, vol. 44(, no. 24, p. 028521, 2023

    2023

  9. [9]

    Low altitude uav traffic management: An introductory overview and proposal,

    Q. Quan, G. Li, Y . Bai, R. Fu, M. Li, C. Ke, and K. Cai, “Low altitude uav traffic management: An introductory overview and proposal,”Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 6–34, 2020

    2020

  10. [10]

    Static pressure from aircraft trailing-cone measurements and numerical weather-prediction analysis,

    U. Schumann, A. Giez, C. Mallaunet al., “Static pressure from aircraft trailing-cone measurements and numerical weather-prediction analysis,” Journal of Aircraft, 2017

    2017

  11. [11]

    Notice on the release of the national airspace basic classification method,

    Civil Aviation Administration of China, “Notice on the release of the national airspace basic classification method,” Tech. Rep., December 2023. [Online]. Available: http://www.caac.gov.cn/XXGK/ XXGK/TZTG/202312/t20231221 222397.html

    2023

  12. [12]

    The development and evaluation of the earth gravitational model 2008 (egm2008),

    N. K. Pavlis, S. A. Holmes, S. C. Kenyon, and J. K. Factor, “The development and evaluation of the earth gravitational model 2008 (egm2008),”Journal of geophysical research: solid earth, vol. 117, no. B4, 2012

    2008

  13. [13]

    On the barometric formula,

    M. N. Berberan-Santos, E. N. Bodunov, and L. Pogliani, “On the barometric formula,”American Journal of Physics, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 404–412, 1997

    1997

  14. [14]

    Icarus - a tool for managing future manned and unmanned aviation,

    O. Manuel, C. Pasquale, C. Mattia, K. Pawel, M. Alberto, O. Corrado, R. Lorenzo, R. Mirko, and T. Cristina, “Icarus - a tool for managing future manned and unmanned aviation,”12th SESAR Innovation Days, 2022, presented at the 12th SESAR Innovation Days. [On- line]. Available: https://innaxis-comm.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/ ENGAGE/WIKI/PAPERS/SIDS/2022...

    2022

  15. [15]

    Icarus project: Common altitude reference for uas in vll airspace,

    S. J. Undertaking, “Icarus project: Common altitude reference for uas in vll airspace,” 2020, available: https://www.sesarju.eu/projects/icarus

    2020

  16. [16]

    Icarus final report: Transition to u-space advanced services,

    ——, “Icarus final report: Transition to u-space advanced services,” 2024, available: https://www.sesarju.eu/sites/default/files/documents/ reports/U-space%20CONOPS%204th%20edition.pdf

    2024

  17. [17]

    Evolution of the world geodetic system 1984 (wgs 84) terrestrial reference frame,

    Stephen, Malys, “Evolution of the world geodetic system 1984 (wgs 84) terrestrial reference frame,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/icg/2018/icg13/wgd/wgd 12.pdf

    1984

  18. [18]

    A study on the 1985 national datum level of altitude,

    Z. Chen, T. Zhou, Y . Yu, E. Tang, and Y . Huang, “A study on the 1985 national datum level of altitude,”Journal of Ocean University of Qingdao, vol. 03, pp. 9–14, 1988

    1985

  19. [19]

    North american vertical datum of 1988 (navd 88),

    NOAA, “North american vertical datum of 1988 (navd 88),” https:// geodesy.noaa.gov/datums/vertical/north-american-vertical-datum-1988. shtml, Tech. Rep., 2024

    1988

  20. [20]

    National geodetic survey glossary,

    National Geodetic Survey, NOAA, “National geodetic survey glossary,” https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/CORS-Proxy/Glossary/xml/NGS Glossary. xml, Tech. Rep., 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    What does height really mean? part iii: Height systems,

    T. H. Meyer, D. R. Roman, and D. B. Zilkoski, “What does height really mean? part iii: Height systems,”Surveying and Land Information Science, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 149–160, 2006

    2006

  22. [22]

    2019 national science and technology award announcement,

    Ministry of Science and Technology of China, “2019 national science and technology award announcement,” https://www.most.gov.cn/ztzl/ gjkxjsjldh/jldh2019/jldh19jlgg/202001/t20200103 150916.html, Tech. Rep., 2024

    2019

  23. [23]

    Traffic management for unmanned aircraft systems (uas),

    Federal Aviation Administration, “Traffic management for unmanned aircraft systems (uas),” Tech. Rep., 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.faa.gov/uas/advanced operations/traffic management

    2024

  24. [24]

    Interim regulations on un- manned aircraft flight management,

    People’s Republic of China Government, “Interim regulations on un- manned aircraft flight management,” Tech. Rep., 2023. [Online]. Avail- able: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/202306/content 6888799.htm

    2023

  25. [25]

    L. H. A. M. Office,Handbook of aviation meteorology. LON- DON:HMSO, 1994

    1994

  26. [26]

    Icao codes,

    International Civil Aviation Organization, “Icao codes,” Tech. Rep., 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.icao.int/nacc/documents/ meetings/2014/ecaraim/ref03-icaocodes.pdf

    2014

  27. [27]

    White paper: Low altitude economic development (2.0) - digital solution,

    H. Shum, S. P. Li, M. Li, Y . Q. Tang, and el. al., “White paper: Low altitude economic development (2.0) - digital solution,” Lower AirSpace Economy Research Institute (LASER), International Digital Economy Academy (IDEA), CFC Building, 5 Shihua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, China, Tech. Rep., November 2023. [Online]. Available: www.idea.edu.cn

    2023

  28. [28]

    Daily mean sea level pressure data,

    Hong Kong Observatory, “Daily mean sea level pressure data,” Tech. Rep., 2024. [Online]. Available: https://data.weather.gov.hk/weatherAPI/ cis/csvfile/HKA/ALL/daily HKA MSLP ALL.csv

    2024

  29. [29]

    The accuracy of local mean sea level in zhejiang coastal area and its application,

    J. Xu and X. Song, “The accuracy of local mean sea level in zhejiang coastal area and its application,”Hydroaphic Surveying And Charting, vol. 04, pp. 28–31+62, 1995

    1995

  30. [30]

    Accuracy and precision of gnss in the field,

    M. Schaefer and A. Pearson, “Accuracy and precision of gnss in the field,” inGPS and GNSS Technology in Geosciences. Elsevier, 2021, pp. 393–414

    2021

  31. [31]

    Worldwide airport database,

    A. H. Partow, “Worldwide airport database,” Tech. Rep., 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.partow.net/miscellaneous/airportdatabase/

    2023

  32. [32]

    A high-accuracy map of global terrain elevations,

    D. Yamazaki, D. Ikeshima, R. Tawatari, T. Yamaguchi, F. O’Loughlin, J. C. Neal, C. C. Sampson, S. Kanae, and P. D. Bates, “A high-accuracy map of global terrain elevations,”Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 5844–5853, 2017

    2017

  33. [33]

    Nasadem dataset,

    NASA LP DAAC, “Nasadem dataset,” Tech. Rep., 2023. [Online]. Available: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/nasadem hgtv001/

    2023

  34. [34]

    The shuttle radar topography mission,

    T. G. Farr, P. A. Rosen, E. Caro, R. Crippen, R. Duren, S. Hensley, ..., and D. Alsdorf, “The shuttle radar topography mission,”Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 45, no. 2, 2007

    2007

  35. [35]

    Copernicus digital elevation model product handbook, geo1988-copernicusdem-spe-002,

    AIRBUS, Z, “Copernicus digital elevation model product handbook, geo1988-copernicusdem-spe-002,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20123/121239/ GEO1988-CopernicusDEM-SPE-002 ProductHandbook I4.0.pdf [37]Precise Global DEM Generation by ALOS PRISM, vol. 2, 2014

    2022

  36. [36]

    Geodetic altitude from barometer and weather data for gnss integrity monitoring in aviation,

    M. Simonetti and O. G. Crespillo, “Geodetic altitude from barometer and weather data for gnss integrity monitoring in aviation,”NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:268526861

    2024

  37. [37]

    Notice soliciting opinions on the draft regulation on airspace management of the people’s republic of china,

    Civil Aviation Administration of China, “Notice soliciting opinions on the draft regulation on airspace management of the people’s republic of china,” Tech. Rep., November 2023. [Online]. Available: http://www.caac.gov.cn/HDJL/YJZJ/202311/t20231108 221957.html

    2023

  38. [38]

    Manual on implementation of a 300 m (1 000 ft.) vertical separation minimum between fl 290 and fl 410 inclusive,

    I. Doc, “Manual on implementation of a 300 m (1 000 ft.) vertical separation minimum between fl 290 and fl 410 inclusive,”Manual on Implementation of a 300 m (1000 ft) Vertical Separation Minimum Between FL 290 and FL 410, Inclusive

  39. [39]

    Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards—i,

    P. G. Reich, “Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards—i,”The Journal of Navigation, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 88–98, 1966

    1966

  40. [40]

    Solution of some problems in the theory of probabilities of significance in automatic telephone exchanges,

    A. K. Erlang, “Solution of some problems in the theory of probabilities of significance in automatic telephone exchanges,”Transactions of the Danish Academy of Technical Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 138–155, 1948

    1948