arxiv: 2604.06303 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🪐 quant-ph · gr-qc· hep-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Optimization of entanglement harvesting with arbitrary temporal profiles: the limit of second order perturbation theory

Marcos Morote-Balboa , T. Rick Perche

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph gr-qchep-th

keywords entanglement harvestingscalar quantum fieldtemporal profilesHermite expansionnegativityperturbation theoryoptimizationsignaling conditions

0 comments

The pith

Optimizing arbitrary temporal profiles via Hermite expansion increases entanglement harvesting by orders of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how two local probes harvest entanglement from the vacuum of a real scalar quantum field when their couplings have arbitrary time dependence. The authors use a Hermite expansion of those profiles to compute the smeared field propagators in closed form and recast the negativity between the probes as a matrix product that can be optimized numerically. They carry out this optimization under different constraints on whether the probes can signal to each other and obtain entanglement enhancements of several orders of magnitude. A sympathetic reader would care because the result suggests that current experimental proposals for vacuum entanglement could be made far more effective, even though the stronger couplings needed would leave the usual weak-coupling regime.

Core claim

We study the protocol of entanglement harvesting when two local probes couple to the vacuum of a real scalar quantum field with arbitrary temporal profiles. We use a Hermite expansion to efficiently compute smeared field propagators in closed-form, recasting the negativity between the probes as a matrix product. We then optimize the protocol under different signalling conditions, enhancing entanglement harvesting by several orders of magnitude. This optimization would take current experimental proposals beyond the regime of second order perturbation theory.

What carries the argument

Hermite expansion of the temporal profiles that yields closed-form expressions for the smeared field propagators, allowing the negativity to be written as a matrix product whose eigenvalues can be maximized under signaling constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The Hermite expansion accurately captures the relevant physics for the chosen profiles and higher-order perturbative corrections remain negligible even after optimization increases the coupling strength or interaction time.

What would settle it

A direct calculation or experiment in an optimized setup showing that the harvested negativity fails to increase by the predicted orders of magnitude or that higher-order terms become large enough to suppress the entanglement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06303 by Marcos Morote-Balboa, T. Rick Perche.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Maximum negativity for detectors separated by a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Maximum negativity Ne + for detectors separated by a distance of L = 5T0 on the subspace spanned by {hn,N }N as a function of N. as N + ∼ λ 2√ Nosc, with Nosc being the number of oscillations of the function. Given that our basis expansion spans all compactly supported switching functions in the limit N → ∞, we can conclude that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Plot of the maximizing functions of Ne within the subspace spanned by {hn,N }N for detectors separated by a distance of L = 5T0. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Maximum eigenvalue of ∆ within the subspace spanned by {hn,N }N for detectors separated by a distance of L = 5T0 as a function of N for different values of Ω. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Negativity plot for the optimal approximately dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Spacetime depiction of the optimal switching func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Negativity and signalling contribution for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The Hermite-expansion trick for optimizing detector profiles is a concrete computational improvement, but the paper does not actually show that the optimized setups leave the second-order regime.

read the letter

The paper's main technical step is to expand the temporal smearing functions in a Hermite basis. This produces closed-form expressions for the smeared propagators and lets them rewrite the negativity as a matrix product that can be optimized numerically under no-signaling constraints. The resulting profiles give negativity values several orders of magnitude larger than the usual Gaussian or constant choices, at least inside the second-order formulas they use throughout the calculation. That part of the work is straightforward and could be adopted by anyone already running numerical harvesting simulations. The method is efficient and the constraints are handled cleanly. The soft spot is the final claim that these optimized protocols push experiments beyond the validity of second-order perturbation theory. All reported numbers come from the second-order expressions; the authors give no estimate of the fourth-order terms in the Dyson series, no comparison of the perturbative parameter before and after optimization, and no check on whether the larger couplings or longer times they reach remain perturbative. Without that, the extrapolation is unsupported. The rest of the paper follows standard techniques in the field with no obvious inconsistencies or circular arguments. This is for people who already model Unruh-DeWitt detectors and want a systematic way to tune temporal profiles. A reader looking for new conceptual insight into entanglement harvesting will not find it. The work is concrete enough to deserve referee time, though any review should ask for explicit bounds on the perturbative parameter for the optimized cases.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies entanglement harvesting from a real scalar quantum field using two local probes with arbitrary temporal profiles. It introduces a Hermite expansion of the smearing functions to obtain closed-form expressions for the smeared propagators, recasts the harvested negativity as a matrix product, and optimizes the profiles under different signalling conditions. The central claim is that this optimization enhances the harvested negativity by several orders of magnitude and pushes the relevant parameters outside the validity regime of second-order perturbation theory.

Significance. If the optimization results and the claimed enhancement hold under a properly validated perturbative regime, the work would provide a concrete, computationally efficient route to substantially stronger entanglement harvesting protocols. The technical device of Hermite expansions yielding closed-form propagators and a matrix-product expression for negativity is a clear methodological advance that could be reused in related relativistic quantum information calculations.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and optimization results] Abstract and the optimization section: the claim that the optimized protocols lie outside the regime of validity of second-order perturbation theory is not supported by any explicit comparison of the perturbative parameter (coupling strength times interaction duration) before versus after optimization, nor by an estimate of the size of fourth-order Dyson terms relative to the retained second-order contribution for the new profiles. Because the entire optimization is performed inside the second-order expressions, this omission directly undermines the central assertion that the results exit the perturbative regime.

minor comments (2)

[Methods] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the range of Hermite truncation orders used and a brief convergence check against the exact propagator for at least one representative profile.
[Results] Notation for the negativity matrix elements and the signalling conditions could be clarified with a short table summarizing the different cases considered.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting this important point about the perturbative regime. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and optimization results] Abstract and the optimization section: the claim that the optimized protocols lie outside the regime of validity of second-order perturbation theory is not supported by any explicit comparison of the perturbative parameter (coupling strength times interaction duration) before versus after optimization, nor by an estimate of the size of fourth-order Dyson terms relative to the retained second-order contribution for the new profiles. Because the entire optimization is performed inside the second-order expressions, this omission directly undermines the central assertion that the results exit the perturbative regime.

Authors: We agree that an explicit comparison is needed to substantiate the claim. In the revised manuscript we will add, in the optimization section, a direct comparison of the perturbative parameter (coupling strength times interaction duration) evaluated on the unoptimized versus optimized profiles. We will also include a qualitative estimate of the relative magnitude of fourth-order contributions based on the scaling of the Dyson series and the structure of the two-point functions, while noting that a complete fourth-order calculation for arbitrary profiles remains beyond the scope of the present work. These additions will either support or appropriately qualify the statement in the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: optimization is a direct numerical procedure on explicitly derived second-order expressions

full rationale

The paper derives closed-form smeared propagators via Hermite expansion of the temporal profiles, recasts the negativity matrix elements as a matrix product, and performs numerical optimization over the expansion coefficients under fixed signalling conditions. All steps are forward computations from the standard second-order perturbative formulas for the negativity; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and the final claim that the optimized protocols lie outside the perturbative regime is an external validity statement rather than a definitional reduction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and does not collapse to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; standard QFT vacuum assumptions are implicit but not specified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5370 in / 1010 out tokens · 28231 ms · 2026-05-10T18:35:36.905445+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Bipartite entanglement harvesting with multiple detectors
quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Multiple Unruh-DeWitt detectors harvest more vacuum entanglement when arranged in specific configurations, with harvested negativity scaling linearly in linear chains.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

van Luijk, A

L. van Luijk, A. Stottmeister, R. F. Werner, and H. Wilming, Relativistic quantum fields are universal entanglement embezzlers, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 261602 (2024)

2024
[2]

Srednicki, Entropy and area, Phys

M. Srednicki, Entropy and area, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 666 (1993)

1993
[3]

Eisert, M

J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010)

2010
[4]

Witten, Aps medal for exceptional achievement in research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory, Rev

E. Witten, Aps medal for exceptional achievement in research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 045003 (2018)

2018
[5]

B. de S. L. Torres, K. Wurtz, J. Polo-G´ omez, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Entanglement structure of quantum fields through local probes, J. High Energy Phys.2023 (5), 58

2023
[6]

Marcovitch, A

S. Marcovitch, A. Retzker, M. B. Plenio, and B. Reznik, Critical and noncritical long-range entanglement in klein- gordon fields, Phys. Rev. A80, 012325 (2009)

2009
[7]

Klco and M

N. Klco and M. J. Savage, Entanglement spheres and a UV-IR connection in effective field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 211602 (2021)

2021
[8]

Gao and N

B. Gao and N. Klco, Detecting spacelike vacuum entan- glement at all distances and promoting negativity to a necessary and sufficient entanglement measure in many- body regimes, Phys. Rev. A112, 012430 (2025)

2025
[9]

Valentini, Non-local correlations in quantum electro- dynamics, Phys

A. Valentini, Non-local correlations in quantum electro- dynamics, Phys. Lett. A153, 321 (1991)

1991
[10]

Reznik, A

B. Reznik, A. Retzker, and J. Silman, Violating Bell’s inequalities in vacuum, Phys. Rev. A71, 042104 (2005)

2005
[11]

Pozas-Kerstjens and E

A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Harvesting correlations from the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. D92, 064042 (2015)

2015
[12]

Gooding, A

C. Gooding, A. Sachs, R. B. Mann, and S. Weinfurt- ner, Vacuum entanglement probes for ultra-cold atom systems (2023), arXiv:2308.07892 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

T. R. Perche, F. Gozzini, and M. K. Oberthaler, Bose po- larons as relativistic Unruh-DeWitt detectors: Entangle- ment harvesting from Bose-Einstein condensates (2026), arXiv:2512.21381 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[14]

F. F. Settembrini, F. Lindel, A. M. Herter, S. Y. Buh- mann, and J. Faist, Detection of quantum-vacuum field correlations outside the light cone, Nature Communica- tions13, 3383 (2022)

2022
[15]

Teixid´ o-Bonfill, X

A. Teixid´ o-Bonfill, X. Dai, A. Lupascu, and E. Mart´ ın- Mart´ ınez, Towards an experimental implementation of entanglement harvesting in superconducting circuits: ef- fect of detector gap variation on entanglement harvesting (2025), arXiv:2505.01516 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Silman and B

J. Silman and B. Reznik, Long-range entanglement in the Dirac vacuum, Phys. Rev. A75, 052307 (2007)

2007
[17]

S. J. Olson and T. C. Ralph, Extraction of timelike en- tanglement from the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. A85, 012306 (2012)

2012
[18]

Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez and N

E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez and N. C. Menicucci, Entanglement in curved spacetimes and cosmology, Class. Quantum Gravity31, 214001 (2014)

2014
[19]

Pozas-Kerstjens and E

A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Entangle- ment harvesting from the electromagnetic vacuum with hydrogenlike atoms, Phys. Rev. D94, 064074 (2016)

2016
[20]

Pozas-Kerstjens, J

A. Pozas-Kerstjens, J. Louko, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Degenerate detectors are unable to harvest spacelike en- tanglement, Phys. Rev. D95, 105009 (2017)

2017
[21]

L. J. Henderson, R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, A. R. H. Smith, and J. Zhang, Harvesting entanglement from the black hole vacuum, Class. Quantum Gravity35, 21LT02 (2018)

2018
[22]

W. Cong, E. Tjoa, and R. B. Mann, Entanglement har- vesting with moving mirrors, J. High Energy Phys.2019 (6), 21

2019
[23]

Tjoa and E

E. Tjoa and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Vacuum entanglement harvesting with a zero mode, Phys. Rev. D101, 125020 (2020)

2020
[24]

J. Foo, R. B. Mann, and M. Zych, Entanglement ampli- fication between superposed detectors in flat and curved spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D103, 065013 (2021)

2021
[25]

Tjoa and E

E. Tjoa and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, When entanglement harvesting is not really harvesting, Phys. Rev. D104, 125005 (2021)

2021
[26]

Stritzelberger, L

N. Stritzelberger, L. J. Henderson, V. Baccetti, N. C. Menicucci, and A. Kempf, Entanglement harvesting with coherently delocalized matter, Phys. Rev. D103, 016007 (2021)

2021
[27]

T. R. Perche, C. Lima, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Har- vesting entanglement from complex scalar and fermionic fields with linearly coupled particle detectors, Phys. Rev. D105, 065016 (2022)

2022
[28]

Z. Liu, J. Zhang, R. B. Mann, and H. Yu, Does accelera- tion assist entanglement harvesting?, Phys. Rev. D105, 085012 (2022). 13

2022
[29]

Maeso-Garc´ ıa, T

H. Maeso-Garc´ ıa, T. R. Perche, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Entanglement harvesting: Detector gap and field mass optimization, Phys. Rev. D106, 045014 (2022)

2022
[30]

T. R. Perche, B. Ragula, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Har- vesting entanglement from the gravitational vacuum, Phys. Rev. D108, 085025 (2023)

2023
[31]

T. R. Perche, J. Polo-G´ omez, B. d. S. L. Torres, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Fully relativistic entanglement har- vesting, Phys. Rev. D109, 045018 (2024)

2024
[32]

Lopez-Raven, R

A. Lopez-Raven, R. B. Mann, and J. Louko, Quenched entanglement harvesting, Phys. Rev. D112, 085001 (2025)

2025
[33]

Fredenhagen, An Introduction to Algebraic Quantum Field Theory, inAdvances in algebraic quantum field the- ory, edited by R

K. Fredenhagen, An Introduction to Algebraic Quantum Field Theory, inAdvances in algebraic quantum field the- ory, edited by R. Brunetti, C. Dappiaggi, K. Freden- hagen, and J. Yngvason (2015) pp. 1–30

2015
[34]

T. R. Perche and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Role of quantum degrees of freedom of relativistic fields in quantum infor- mation protocols, Phys. Rev. A107, 042612 (2023)

2023
[35]

W. G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

1976
[36]

DeWitt,General Relativity; an Einstein Centenary Survey(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1980)

B. DeWitt,General Relativity; an Einstein Centenary Survey(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1980)

1980
[37]

Funai, J

N. Funai, J. Louko, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, ˆp· ˆAvs ˆx· ˆE: Gauge invariance in quantum optics and quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D99, 065014 (2019)

2019
[38]

Lopp and E

R. Lopp and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Quantum delocaliza- tion, gauge, and quantum optics: Light-matter interac- tion in relativistic quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 103, 013703 (2021)

2021
[39]

B. d. S. L. Torres, T. Rick Perche, A. G. S. Landulfo, and G. E. A. Matsas, Neutrino flavor oscillations without flavor states, Phys. Rev. D102, 093003 (2020)

2020
[40]

J. P. M. Pitelli and T. R. Perche, Angular momen- tum based graviton detector, Phys. Rev. D104, 065016 (2021)

2021
[41]

W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle, Phys. Rev. D29, 1047 (1984)

1984
[42]

T. R. Perche, Localized nonrelativistic quantum systems in curved spacetimes: A general characterization of par- ticle detector models, Phys. Rev. D106, 025018 (2022)

2022
[43]

T. R. Perche, J. Polo-G´ omez, B. de S. L. Torres, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Particle Detectors from Local- ized Quantum Field Theories (2023), arXiv:2308.11698 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[44]

Hotta, Quantum measurement information as a key to energy extraction from local vacuums, Phys

M. Hotta, Quantum measurement information as a key to energy extraction from local vacuums, Phys. Rev. D 78, 045006 (2008)

2008
[45]

Quantum Energy Teleportation: An Introductory Review,

M. Hotta, Quantum Energy Teleportation: An Introduc- tory Review (2011), arXiv:1101.3954 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[46]

Hotta, J

M. Hotta, J. Matsumoto, and G. Yusa, Quantum energy teleportation without a limit of distance, Phys. Rev. A 89, 012311 (2014)

2014
[47]

Funai and E

N. Funai and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Engineering negative stress-energy densities with quantum energy teleporta- tion, Phys. Rev. D96, 025014 (2017)

2017
[48]

Ragula and E

B. Ragula and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, A review of applica- tions of quantum energy teleportation: from experimen- tal tests to thermodynamics and spacetime engineering (2025), arXiv:2505.04689 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

R. H. Jonsson, E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, and A. Kempf, In- formation transmission without energy exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 110505 (2015)

2015
[50]

Blasco, L

A. Blasco, L. J. Garay, M. Mart´ ın-Benito, and E. Mart´ ın- Mart´ ınez, Violation of the Strong Huygen’s Principle and Timelike Signals from the Early Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 141103 (2015)

2015
[51]

Blasco, L

A. Blasco, L. J. Garay, M. Mart´ ın-Benito, and E. Mart´ ın- Mart´ ınez, Timelike information broadcasting in cosmol- ogy, Phys. Rev. D93, 024055 (2016)

2016
[52]

Martin-Martinez, D

E. Martin-Martinez, D. Aasen, and A. Kempf, Processing quantum information with relativistic motion of atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 160501 (2013)

2013
[53]

Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez and C

E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez and C. Sutherland, Quantum gates via relativistic remote control, Phys. Lett. B739, 74–82 (2014)

2014
[54]

Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Causality issues of particle detector models in QFT and quantum optics, Phys

E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Causality issues of particle detector models in QFT and quantum optics, Phys. Rev. D92, 104019 (2015)

2015
[55]

Layden, E

D. Layden, E. Martin-Martinez, and A. Kempf, Universal scheme for indirect quantum control, Phys. Rev. A93, 040301 (2016)

2016
[56]

P. A. LeMaitre, T. R. Perche, M. Krumm, and H. J. Briegel, Universal quantum computer from relativistic motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 190601 (2025)

2025
[57]

Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez and P

E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez and P. Rodriguez-Lopez, Relativis- tic quantum optics: The relativistic invariance of the light-matter interaction models, Phys. Rev. D97, 105026 (2018)

2018
[58]

Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, T

E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, T. R. Perche, and B. de S. L. Torres, General relativistic quantum optics: Finite-size particle detector models in curved spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D101, 045017 (2020)

2020
[59]

Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, T

E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, T. R. Perche, and B. d. S. L. Tor- res, Broken covariance of particle detector models in rela- tivistic quantum information, Phys. Rev. D103, 025007 (2021)

2021
[60]

Vidal and R

G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of en- tanglement, Phys. Rev. A65, 032314 (2002)

2002
[61]

M. B. Plenio, Logarithmic negativity: A full entangle- ment monotone that is not convex, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 090503 (2005)

2005
[62]

Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Physical Review Letters77, 1413–1415 (1996)

A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Physical Review Letters77, 1413–1415 (1996)

1996
[63]

Horodecki, P

M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Separa- bility of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions, Physics Letters A223, 1–8 (1996)

1996
[64]

T. R. Perche, Closed-form expressions for smeared bidis- tributions of a massless scalar field: Nonperturbative and asymptotic results in relativistic quantum information, Phys. Rev. D110, 025013 (2024)

2024
[65]

K. K. Ng, R. B. Mann, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, New techniques for entanglement harvesting in flat and curved spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D97, 125011 (2018)

2018
[66]

Morote-Balboa and T

M. Morote-Balboa and T. R. Perche, Entanglement Har- vesting Explorer (2026), online tool for computing nega- tivity and downloading numerical data

2026
[67]

Simidzija, R

P. Simidzija, R. H. Jonsson, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, General no-go theorem for entanglement extraction, Phys. Rev. D97, 125002 (2018)

2018
[68]

W. Cong, C. Qian, M. R. Good, and R. B. Mann, Effects of horizons on entanglement harvesting, J. High Energy Phys.2020(10), 67. 14

2020
[69]

Agullo, B

I. Agullo, B. Bonga, E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, S. Nadal- Gisbert, T. R. Perche, J. Polo-G´ omez, P. Ribes-Metidieri, and B. d. S. L. Torres, Multimode nature of spacetime entanglement in qft, Phys. Rev. D111, 085013 (2025)

2025
[70]

Shore and P

B. Shore and P. Knight, The jaynes–cummings revival, inPhysics and Probability: Essays in Honor of Edwin T. Jaynes, edited by W. T. Grandy, Jr and P. W. Milonni (Cambridge University Press, 1993) p. 15–32

1993
[71]

Robinett, Quantum wave packet revivals, Physics Re- ports392, 1 (2004)

R. Robinett, Quantum wave packet revivals, Physics Re- ports392, 1 (2004)

2004
[72]

Strange, Relativistic quantum revivals, Phys

P. Strange, Relativistic quantum revivals, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 120403 (2010)

2010
[73]

E. G. Brown, E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, N. C. Menicucci, and R. B. Mann, Detectors for probing relativistic quantum physics beyond perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D87, 084062 (2013)

2013
[74]

Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, E

E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, E. G. Brown, W. Donnelly, and A. Kempf, Sustainable entanglement production from a quantum field, Phys. Rev. A88, 052310 (2013)

2013
[75]

Simidzija and E

P. Simidzija and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Nonperturbative analysis of entanglement harvesting from coherent field states, Phys. Rev. D96, 065008 (2017)

2017
[76]

Polo-G´ omez and E

J. Polo-G´ omez and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, Nonperturba- tive method for particle detectors with continuous inter- actions, Phys. Rev. D109, 045014 (2024). Appendix A: Computation of the Matrix elements In this appendix, we derive Eq. (40) and use it to compute the matrices of the different propagators at play,G ++ ab, W −+ aa,W −+ bb and ∆++ ab. In Eq. (...

2024
[77]

erfi |L| −t 0 −i(Ω 1T 2 1 −Ω 2T 2 2 )√ 2 p T 2 1 +T 2 2 +σ 2 1 +σ 2 2 ! + e − (t0+|L|+i(Ω1 T2 1 −Ω2 T2 2 ))2 2(T2 1 +T2 2 +σ2 1+σ2
[78]

e− (L+vT 2)2 4T2 erfi L+vT 2 2T + e− (L−vT 2)2 4T2 erfi L−vT 2 2T # = Te −Ω2T 2 4L√π e 1 4 T 2u2 e−iΩT 2u

erfi |L|+t 0 + i(Ω1T 2 1 −Ω 2T 2 2 )√ 2 p T 2 1 +T 2 2 +σ 2 1 +σ 2 2 !# , (A4) ∆(f1, f2) =− T1T2ei(Ω1t1+Ω2t2)e− Ω2 2 T2 2 2 − Ω2 1 T2 1 2 2 √ 2π|L| p T 2 1 +T 2 2 + 2σ2 " e − (t0 −|L|+i(Ω1 T2 1 −Ω2 T2 2 ))2 2(T2 1 +T2 2 +2σ2) erf |L|(T 2 1 +T 2 2 )+2σ2(t0+i(Ω1T 2 1 −Ω2T 2 2 )) 2σ √ T 2 1 +T 2 2 √ T 2 1 +T 2 2 +2σ2 + e − (t0+|L|+i(Ω1 T2 1 −Ω2 T2 2 ))2 2(T2...