pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11855 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Localization with Hopping Disorder in Quasi-periodic Synthetic Momentum Lattice

Joel M. Sunil , J. Bharathi Kannan , Monu Bhartiya , Rayees A S , Shuvarati Roy , G. J. Sreejith , M. S. Santhanam , Umakant Rapol

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph
keywords localizationhopping disorderAubry-André modelmomentum space latticequasiperiodic systemsultracold atomsBose-Einstein condensate
0
0 comments X

The pith

Uncorrelated hopping disorder enhances localization in quasiperiodic chains and turns the transition into a smooth crossover.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper realizes a generalized Aubry-André chain with added hopping disorder using a Bose-Einstein condensate in a momentum-space lattice created by multiple Bragg diffractions. Experiments and numerics show that uncorrelated disorder strengthens localization in every phase and replaces the sharp localization transition with a gradual crossover between weak and strong regimes. Spatially correlated disorder, by contrast, partially delocalizes states near strong hopping bonds. The quantitative match between measured dynamics and simulations demonstrates that the momentum-space platform can impose arbitrary disorder patterns and resolve correlation-dependent effects.

Core claim

In a momentum-space-lattice implementation of the generalized Aubry-André model, uncorrelated hopping disorder increases localization across all phases and converts the localization transition into a crossover between weakly and strongly localized regimes, whereas spatially correlated hopping disorder produces partial delocalization of states near strong bonds; experimental expansion dynamics agree quantitatively with numerical simulations of the disordered model.

What carries the argument

The multiple-Bragg-diffraction momentum-space lattice, which encodes a generalized Aubry-André Hamiltonian together with arbitrary, spatially correlated hopping disorder in the synthetic momentum dimension.

If this is right

  • Localization can be tuned continuously by varying the strength and spatial correlation of hopping disorder.
  • Dynamical signatures that depend on disorder correlations become experimentally resolvable.
  • The platform extends quantum simulation from pure quasiperiodicity to general disordered Hamiltonians.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same control over hopping correlations could be used to study many-body localization when interactions are added.
  • The approach may be extended to other synthetic dimensions or to disorder in onsite potentials.
  • Quantitative agreement at moderate disorder strengths suggests the platform can test predictions for the crossover regime that are difficult to access in real-space lattices.

Load-bearing premise

The momentum-space lattice faithfully implements the target Hamiltonian with precisely controlled hopping disorder and negligible unwanted couplings or decoherence.

What would settle it

If the measured expansion rates or localization lengths deviated systematically from the predictions of the numerical simulation that includes only the engineered hopping disorder, the claim of faithful realization and disorder-enhanced localization would be contradicted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11855 by G. J. Sreejith, J. Bharathi Kannan, Joel M. Sunil, Monu Bhartiya, M. S. Santhanam, Rayees A S, Shuvarati Roy, Umakant Rapol.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Schematic depiction of AA chain with hopping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. IPR (a-e) and RP (f-h) as a function of quasiperiodic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) IPR averaged over 50 realizations vs correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (b,d) Correlated disorder: Eigenstates collapse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The NPR vs lambda plots for the GAA model. The NPR gives a clearer picture of the effect of adding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Lattice quasi-periodicity is easily realized with ultracold atoms in optical lattices and has been used to study delocalization-localization transition at low dimensions. Models with true disorder, however, remains largely unrealized in experiments. Here, using Bose-Einstein Condensate of ${^{87}{\text{Rb}}}$ atoms, we realize a Generalized Aubry-Andr\'e (GAA) chain with added hopping disorder in a Momentum Space Lattice (MSL) via multiple Bragg diffractions. Unlike real space lattice simulators, MSL allows simulations of arbitrary disorder configurations and control over spatial disorder correlations. Uncorrelated hopping disorder added to the AA model enhances localization in all phases, smoothening the transition into a crossover between weakly and strongly localized regimes. On the other hand, numerical analysis shows that, spatially correlated hopping disorder induces partial delocalization of localized states in the vicinity of strong hopping bonds. Over a range of disorder strengths and correlations, the experimental results agree quantitatively with the numerical simulation of the dynamics in MSL. Ability of the platform to resolve correlation-dependent dynamical features in dynamics reflects the precision achieved in the realization. Our results demonstrate MSL as a viable platform for studying general disordered quantum systems beyond quasiperiodic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental realization of a generalized Aubry-André (GAA) chain with added hopping disorder in a momentum space lattice (MSL) using a 87Rb BEC and multiple Bragg diffractions. It claims that uncorrelated hopping disorder enhances localization in all phases and converts the localization transition into a smooth crossover between weakly and strongly localized regimes, while spatially correlated hopping disorder induces partial delocalization near strong bonds. Experimental dynamics are stated to agree quantitatively with numerical simulations of the MSL over a range of disorder strengths and correlations.

Significance. If the results hold, this establishes MSL as a platform for simulating general disordered quantum systems with arbitrary and spatially correlated hopping disorder, extending beyond quasiperiodic models. The reported ability to resolve correlation-dependent features in dynamics would demonstrate a useful advance in controlling and studying localization phenomena.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of quantitative agreement between experiment and 'numerical simulation of the dynamics in MSL' is load-bearing for the experimental validation, yet the manuscript provides no explicit statement on whether these simulations employ the ideal target GAA Hamiltonian or the actual experimental parameters (including measured hopping amplitudes and any residual couplings).
  2. [Experimental implementation] Experimental implementation section: The assertion that multiple-Bragg-diffraction MSL enables 'precisely controlled hopping disorder' and 'negligible unwanted couplings' lacks quantitative characterization, such as bounds on momentum-dependent extra terms or decoherence rates; without this, the fidelity to the intended model cannot be confirmed and alternative explanations for the observed correlation dependence remain possible.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces the acronym MSL without prior definition; spell out 'momentum space lattice' on first use.
  2. [Results] Figures presenting localization measures or dynamical data should include error bars and details of the disorder-generation protocol to support the stated quantitative agreement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped clarify key aspects of our work. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve precision and transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim of quantitative agreement between experiment and 'numerical simulation of the dynamics in MSL' is load-bearing for the experimental validation, yet the manuscript provides no explicit statement on whether these simulations employ the ideal target GAA Hamiltonian or the actual experimental parameters (including measured hopping amplitudes and any residual couplings).

    Authors: We agree that this distinction is important for validating the experimental results. The numerical simulations model the actual experimental MSL, incorporating the measured hopping amplitudes obtained from calibration of the multiple Bragg diffractions and any residual couplings determined from our experimental characterization. This is described in the Methods section and Supplementary Information. We have revised the abstract to explicitly state that the agreement is with 'numerical simulations of the dynamics in the experimental MSL using measured parameters,' and added a clarifying sentence in the Experimental implementation section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental implementation] The assertion that multiple-Bragg-diffraction MSL enables 'precisely controlled hopping disorder' and 'negligible unwanted couplings' lacks quantitative characterization, such as bounds on momentum-dependent extra terms or decoherence rates; without this, the fidelity to the intended model cannot be confirmed and alternative explanations for the observed correlation dependence remain possible.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative bounds would strengthen the claims of fidelity. In the revised manuscript, we have added explicit characterization: unwanted momentum-dependent couplings are bounded below 5% of the primary hopping amplitudes based on our calibration measurements, and decoherence rates are below 0.1 Hz over the relevant experimental timescales (detailed in the Experimental implementation section and Supplementary Material). These bounds confirm that the observed correlation-dependent features arise from the intended hopping disorder rather than artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental validation against independent numerics is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental realization of the generalized Aubry-André model plus controlled hopping disorder in a momentum-space lattice, followed by direct comparison of observed localization dynamics to separate numerical simulations of the target Hamiltonian. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the quantitative experiment-numerics agreement functions as an external consistency check rather than a tautological renaming of inputs. The platform's fidelity to the ideal model is an empirical assumption tested by the data, not presupposed in the derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard atomic-physics assumptions and the fidelity of the synthetic-lattice mapping; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • hopping-disorder amplitude
    Tunable experimental parameter whose value is chosen to explore different regimes; not derived from first principles.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Bragg-diffraction sequence implements the desired tight-binding Hamiltonian with controlled hopping terms
    Invoked to equate the optical setup with the target GAA-plus-disorder model.
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics governs the evolution of the condensate in the synthetic lattice
    Background assumption for all dynamics and localization analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5554 in / 1381 out tokens · 53980 ms · 2026-05-10T16:20:07.701591+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Floquet mobility edges and transport in a periodically driven generalized Aubry-Andr\'e model

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    Periodic driving of the generalized Aubry-André model produces controllable delocalized-localized and multifractal-localized Floquet mobility edges with corresponding superdiffusive to subdiffusive transport.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  2. [2]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  3. [3]

    Lagendijk, B

    A. Lagendijk, B. v. Tiggelen, and D. S. Wiersma, Fifty years of anderson localization, Physics today62, 24 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    Billy, V

    J. Billy, V. Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. Lugan, D. Cl´ ement, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Direct observation of anderson localiza- tion of matter waves in a controlled disorder, Nature453, 891 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. In- guscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting bose– einstein condensate, Nature453, 895 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    Kondov, W

    S. Kondov, W. McGehee, W. Xu, and B. DeMarco, Disorder-induced localization in a strongly correlated atomic hubbard gas, Physical Review Letters114, 083002 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    Semeghini, M

    G. Semeghini, M. Landini, P. Castilho, S. Roy, G. Spag- nolli, A. Trenkwalder, M. Fattori, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Measurement of the mobility edge for 3d anderson localization, Nature Physics11, 554 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    Schwartz, G

    T. Schwartz, G. Bartal, S. Fishman, and M. Segev, Transport and anderson localization in disordered two- dimensional photonic lattices, Nature446, 52 (2007)

    2007

  9. [9]

    A. A. Chabanov, M. Stoytchev, and A. Z. Genack, Statis- tical signatures of photon localization, Nature404, 850 (2000)

    2000

  10. [10]

    Lahini, R

    Y. Lahini, R. Pugatch, F. Pozzi, M. Sorel, R. Moran- dotti, N. Davidson, and Y. Silberberg, Observation of a localization transition in quasiperiodic photonic lattices, Physical Review Letters103, 013901 (2009)

    2009

  11. [11]

    D. S. Wiersma, P. Bartolini, A. Lagendijk, and R. Righ- ini, Localization of light in a disordered medium, Nature 390, 671 (1997)

    1997

  12. [12]

    Abrahams, P

    E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Scaling theory of localization: Ab- sence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions, Physical Review Letters42, 673 (1979)

    1979

  13. [13]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, Analyticity breaking and An- derson localization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Isr. Phys. Soc.3, 133 (1980)

    1980

  14. [14]

    P. G. Harper, Single band motion of conduction electrons in a uniform magnetic field, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A68, 874 (1955)

    1955

  15. [15]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of inter- acting fermions in a quasi-random optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015)

    2015

  16. [16]

    H. P. L¨ uschen, S. Scherg, T. Kohlert, M. Schreiber, P. Bordia, X. Li, S. D. Sarkar, and I. Bloch, Single- particle mobility edge in a one-dimensional quasiperi- odic optical lattice, Physical Review Letters120, 160404 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    Bordia, H

    P. Bordia, H. L¨ uschen, U. Schneider, M. Knap, and I. Bloch, Periodically driving a many-body localized quantum system, Nat. Phys.13, 460 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    F. A. An, K. Padavic, E. J. Meier, S. Hegde, S. Gane- shan, J. H. Pixley, S. Vishveshwara, and B. Gadway, In- teractions and mobility edges: Observing the general- ized Aubry-Andr´ e model, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 040603 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Verbin, O

    M. Verbin, O. Zilberberg, Y. E. Kraus, Y. Lahini, and Y. Silberberg, Observation of topological phase transi- tions in photonic quasicrystals, Physical Review Letters 110, 076403 (2013)

    2013

  20. [20]

    Y. E. Kraus, Y. Lahini, Z. Ringel, M. Verbin, and O. Zilberberg, Topological states and adiabatic pump- ing in quasicrystals, Physical Review Letters109, 106402 (2012)

    2012

  21. [21]

    Li, Y.-Y

    H. Li, Y.-Y. Wang, Y.-H. Shi, K. Huang, X. Song, G.- H. Liang, Z.-Y. Mei, B. Zhou, H. Zhang, J.-C. Zhang, S. Chen, S. P. Zhao, Y. Tian, Z.-Y. Yang, Z. Xiang, K. Xu, D. Zheng, and H. Fan, Observation of criti- cal phase transition in a generalized aubry-andr´ e-harper model with superconducting circuits, npj Quantum In- formation9, 10.1038/s41534-023-00712...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00712-w 2023

  22. [22]

    Q. Guo, C. Cheng, H. Li, S. Xu, P. Zhang, Z. Wang, C. Song, W. Liu, W. Ren, H. Dong, R. Mondaini, and H. Wang, Stark many-body localization on a supercon- ducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 240502 6 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    Biddle and S

    J. Biddle and S. Das Sarma, Predicted mobility edges in one-dimensional incommensurate optical lattices: An exactly solvable model of Anderson localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 070601 (2010)

    2010

  24. [24]

    Ganeshan, J

    S. Ganeshan, J. H. Pixley, and S. Das Sarma, Nearest neighbor tight binding models with an exact mobility edge in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 146601 (2015)

    2015

  25. [25]

    X. Li, X. Li, and S. Das Sarma, Mobility edges in one-dimensional bichromatic incommensurate potentials, Physical Review B96, 085119 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    X. Li, S. Ganeshan, J. Pixley, and S. Das Sarma, Many- body localization and quantum nonergodicity in a model with a single-particle mobility edge, Physical Review Let- ters115, 186601 (2015)

    2015

  27. [27]

    S. Roy, I. M. Khaymovich, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Mul- tifractality without fine-tuning in a floquet quasiperiodic chain, SciPost Physics4, 025 (2018)

    2018

  28. [28]

    Shimasaki, M

    T. Shimasaki, M. Prichard, H. E. Kondakci, J. E. Pagett, Y. Bai, P. Dotti, A. Cao, A. R. Dardia, T.-C. Lu, T. Grover, and D. M. Weld, Anomalous localization in a kicked quasicrystal, Nature Physics20, 409 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    S. Roy, T. Mishra, B. Tanatar, and S. Basu, Reentrant lo- calization transition in a quasiperiodic chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 106803 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    X. Deng, S. Ray, S. Sinha, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and L. San- tos, One-dimensional quasicrystals with power-law hop- ping, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 025301 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    Y. Wang, X. Xia, L. Zhang, H. Yao, S. Chen, J. You, Q. Zhou, and X.-J. Liu, One-dimensional quasiperiodic mosaic lattice with exact mobility edges, Physical Review Letters125, 196604 (2020)

    2020

  32. [32]

    E. J. Meier, F. A. An, and B. Gadway, Atom-optics sim- ulator of lattice transport phenomena, Phys. Rev. A93, 051602 (2016)

    2016

  33. [33]

    Gorin, T

    T. Gorin, T. Prosen, T. H. Seligman, and M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Dynamics of loschmidt echoes and fidelity decay, Physics Reports435, 33 (2006)

    2006

  34. [34]

    Torres-Herrera and L

    E. Torres-Herrera and L. F. Santos, Dynamical man- ifestations of quantum chaos: correlation hole and bulge, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences375, 20160434 (2017)

    2017

  35. [35]

    T. P. Eggarter and R. Riedinger, Singular behavior of tight-binding chains with off-diagonal disorder, Phys. Rev. B18, 569 (1978)

    1978

  36. [36]

    J. A. Fleck, J. R. Morris, and M. D. Feit, Time-dependent propagation of high-energy laser beams through the at- mosphere: numerical methods, Appl. Phys.10, 129 (1976)

    1976

  37. [37]

    F. A. An, E. J. Meier, J. Ang’ong’a, and B. Gadway, Correlated dynamics in a synthetic lattice of momentum states, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 040407 (2018)

    2018

  38. [38]

    N. A. Khan, X. Wei, S. Cheng, M. Jan, and G. Xian- long, Dynamical phase transitions in dimerized lattices, Physics Letters A475, 128880 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Q.-B. Zeng, S. Chen, and R. L¨ u, Quench dynamics in the aubry–andr´ e–harper model with p-wave superconductiv- ity, New Journal of Physics20, 053012 (2018). Supplementary Information Localization with Hopping Disorder in Quasi-periodic Synthetic Momentum Lattice I. ST A TE-RESOL VED LOCALIZA TION AND LOCAL DISORDER ENVIRONMENT To clarify how spatial corr...

    2018

  40. [40]

    Stenger, S

    J. Stenger, S. Inouye, A. P. Chikkatur, D. M. Stamper- Kurn, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Bragg spec- troscopy of a Bose–Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4569 (1999)

    1999

  41. [41]

    E. J. Meier, F. A. An, and B. Gadway, Atom-optics sim- ulator of lattice transport phenomena, Phys. Rev. A93, 051602(R) (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    J. A. Fleck, J. R. Morris, and M. D. Feit, Time-dependent propagation of high-energy laser beams through the atmo- sphere: numerical methods, Appl. Phys.10, 129 (1976)

    1976