pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26927 · v2 · pith:5OPKJTXDnew · submitted 2026-04-29 · 🪐 quant-ph

The most discriminable quantum states in the multicopy regime

Maria Kvashchuk , Polina Chernyshova , Lucas E. A. Porto , Ties-A. Ohst , Lucas B. Vieira , Marco T\'ulio Quintino This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 08:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum state discriminationk-designsmulticopy regimeminimum-error discriminationBayes capacityquadratic advantagepure vs mixed states
0
0 comments X

The pith

For pure states with enough copies, k-designs maximize the success probability of minimum-error discrimination.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that when the number of states N is large enough to admit a quantum state k-design, those designs achieve the highest possible success probability for distinguishing k identical copies drawn uniformly from the ensemble. Mixed states can outperform pure ones once N exceeds the design threshold. The classical version of the problem maps exactly onto the multiplicative Bayes capacity of classical channels, which yields a quadratic quantum advantage in the number of copies k and a reduced constant advantage when restricted to real qubits.

Core claim

For pure state ensembles, whenever N is large enough to support a state k-design, these designs will exactly give rise to the maximally discriminable sets. When N exceeds the size required for a k-design, mixed states can outperform all pure state ensembles. Quantum systems offer a quadratic advantage in number of copies k over classical ones, which is reduced to a constant advantage for real quantum states when N ≥ k + 1.

What carries the argument

Quantum state k-designs (ensembles whose k-th moments match the uniform distribution over pure states) together with the one-to-one mapping of the classical problem to the multiplicative Bayes capacity of independent channel uses.

If this is right

  • Pure-state k-designs are optimal for minimum-error discrimination whenever N meets or exceeds the design size.
  • Mixed states become strictly better than any pure ensemble once N grows larger than the k-design threshold.
  • Quantum systems require only quadratically fewer copies than classical systems to reach the same discrimination performance.
  • For real qubits the quantum advantage shrinks to a constant factor once N ≥ k + 1.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The optimality result may fail for non-uniform priors or for discrimination figures of merit other than minimum error.
  • The classical-to-quantum gap suggests that leakage measures based on Bayes capacity could be tightened by allowing quantum encodings.
  • Computational upper-bound techniques introduced in the paper could be applied to other symmetric discrimination tasks beyond the multicopy setting.

Load-bearing premise

The ensemble is uniformly distributed over the N states and the discrimination task uses the minimum-error success probability.

What would settle it

An explicit ensemble of N pure states, with N large enough for a k-design, whose minimum-error success probability for k copies exceeds that of any k-design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26927 by Lucas B. Vieira, Lucas E. A. Porto, Marco T\'ulio Quintino, Maria Kvashchuk, Polina Chernyshova, Ties-A. Ohst.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pictorial illustration of the k-copy discrimination scenario considered in this work, where dashed wires represent classical systems and single wires represent quantum systems. With uniform probability, the state ρ ⊗k i ∈ L(C d ) ⊗k is pre￾pared. In order to discriminate among a set of N states, one may perform a joint measurement described by a POVM {Mj}j , where Mj ∈ L(C d ) ⊗k . The discrimination task … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An equilateral triangle in the XZ plane of the Bloch view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Tetrahedron view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Triangle and fully mixed state. 6.4 Asymptotic analysis of Ω q (d, N, k) As discussed in the previous section, for pure states we have Ω q pure(d, N ≥ N ′ , k) ≤ 1 N (k + d − 1)d−1 (d − 1)! . (59) From analogous arguments, the upper bound on Ω q (d, N, k) ensures that Ω q (d, N ≥ N ′ , k) ≤ 1 N (k + d 2 − 1)d 2−1 (d 2 − 1)! , (60) from which we conclude that Ω q (d, N ≥ N ′ , k) = O view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (d, N, k) = (2, 6, 3) (a) Ω q pure(2, 7, 3) = 0.5714 (b) Ωq (2, 7, 3) = 0.6429 view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (d, N, k) = (2, 7, 3) 11 The relationship between k-copy discrimination and state k-designs In this section we summarise the results obtained in this work that connect the problem of finding the most discriminable k-copy states with the concept of state k-designs. 11.1 Pure quantum states When focusing on pure quantum states (see Section 5), the relationship between the problem of finding the most discrim… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (d, N, k) = (2, 5, 2) (a) Ω q pure(2, 5, 3) = 0.7901 (b) Ωq (2, 5, 3) = 0.8771 view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (d, N, k) = (2, 5, 3) (a) Ω q pure(2, 6, 3) = 0.5 (b) Ωq (2, 6, 3) = 0.7418 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work investigates which sets of quantum states give rise to the highest achievable success probability in minimum-error state discrimination if multiple copies of the unknown state are given. Specifically, we consider uniformly distributed ensembles of the form $\left\{\frac{1}{N},\rho_i^{\otimes k}\right\}_{i=1}^N$, where $N$ states in dimension $d$ are provided in $k$ identical copies, and derive universal limits in this scenario. For pure state ensembles, we prove that whenever $N$ is large enough to support a state $k$-design, these designs will exactly give rise to the maximally discriminable sets. We further show that when $N$ exceeds the size required for a $k$-design, mixed states can outperform all pure state ensembles. We then recognise that the problem of most discriminable classical states in the multi-copy regime is in one-to-one correspondence to the concept of the multiplicative Bayes capacity of independent uses of classical channels, a concept that emerges naturally in the context of classical information leakage. This connection allows us to completely solve the classical analogue of our problem when $N\geq \binom{d + k - 1}{k}$, and to prove that quantum systems offer a quadratic advantage (in number of copies $k$) over classical ones. Then, we prove that this classical over quantum advantage is strongly reduced when one is restricted to real quantum states, more precisely, when $N \geq k + 1$, pure real qubits only offer a constant advantage over classical bits. Finally, we introduce computational techniques to find sets of most discriminable ensembles and to obtain rigorous universal upper bounds on the maximal success probability for multi-copy state discrimination in cases that are analytically intractable.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to derive universal limits on the maximum success probability for minimum-error discrimination of uniformly distributed ensembles of k copies of N states in dimension d. For pure states, it proves that state k-designs achieve the maximum when N is large enough. Mixed states can outperform pure ones for larger N. It maps the classical problem to multiplicative Bayes capacity of channels, solves it for N at least the binomial coefficient, proves quadratic quantum advantage in k, shows that for real qubits the advantage is constant when N >= k+1, and introduces computational techniques for upper bounds and optimization in intractable cases.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this work provides exact optimality results for multicopy state discrimination using designs, a clear separation between quantum and classical performance, and practical methods for computation. The correspondence to classical concepts is a strength, allowing complete solution of the classical case. This is significant for understanding the power of quantum systems in discrimination tasks and for applications in quantum information processing.

minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the ensembles could be clarified in the introduction to distinguish between the state dimension d and the number of copies k more explicitly.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'quadratic advantage (in number of copies k)' could be expanded to specify over what quantity the advantage is measured, e.g., the scaling with k.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our manuscript, recognition of its significance, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper derives that k-designs achieve maximal discrimination success by showing they saturate an upper bound obtained from the k-th moment equaling the Haar integral; this is a direct achievement of an independently derived bound rather than a definitional reduction. The classical solution is obtained via an external one-to-one correspondence to multiplicative Bayes capacity of channels, solved explicitly when N meets the binomial threshold. The quadratic quantum advantage follows from comparing these two explicit constructions under the stated uniform-prior and minimum-error conditions. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatz smuggling appear. The result is self-contained against the external benchmarks of design theory and classical information theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such quantities remain unknown.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5867 in / 1075 out tokens · 36013 ms · 2026-07-01T08:27:55.060708+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-signaling assistance in prepare-and-measure scenarios with classical communication

    quant-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Non-adaptive non-signaling assistance simulates quantum communication in PM scenarios with a classical dit replacing a qudit, while adaptive NS advantages are confined to single-setting receiver cases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 21 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. M. Barnett and S. Croke, Quantum state dis- crimination, Advances in Optics and Photonics 1, 238 (2009), arXiv:0810.1970 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    Quantum state discrimination and its applications

    J. Bae and L.-C. Kwek, Quantum state discrim- ination and its applications, Journal of Phys- ics A Mathematical General48, 083001 (2015), arXiv:1707.02571 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum crypto- graphy: Public key distribution and coin tossing, arXiv e-prints (2020), arXiv:2003.06557 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Wolf,������� ��� ������������� �� ������ ������� ���� ���������(Springer Cham, 2021)

    R. Wolf,������� ��� ������������� �� ������ ������� ���� ���������(Springer Cham, 2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Unambiguous discrimination among oracle operators

    A. Chefles, A. Kitagawa, M. Takeoka, M. Sa- saki, and J. Twamley, Unambiguous discrimina- tion among oracle operators, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General40, 10183–10213 (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0702245 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    Quantum Copy-Protection and Quantum Money

    S. Aaronson, Quantum Copy-Protection and Quantum Money, arXiv e-prints (2011), arXiv:1110.5353 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Optimal counterfeiting attacks and generalizations for Wiesner's quantum money

    A. Molina, T. Vidick, and J. Watrous, Op- timal counterfeiting attacks and generalizations for Wiesner’s quantum money, arXiv e-prints (2012), arXiv:1202.4010 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Hayashi, Quantum hypothesis testing and discrimination of quantum states, in������� ������������ �� ������������(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006) pp

    M. Hayashi, Quantum hypothesis testing and discrimination of quantum states, in������� ������������ �� ������������(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006) pp. 69–91

    2006

  9. [9]

    Dimension witnesses and quantum state discrimination

    N. Brunner, M. Navascués, and T. Vértesi, Di- mension Witnesses and Quantum State Discrim- ination, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 150501 (2013), arXiv:1209.5643 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    C. W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estima- tion theory, Journal of statistical physics1, 231– 252 (1969)

    1969

  11. [11]

    J. Zhou, S. Chessa, E. Chitambar, and F. Led- itzky, On the distinguishability of geometric- ally uniform quantum states, Journal of Phys- ics A Mathematical General58, 415303 (2025), arXiv:2501.12376 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Watrous,��� ������ �� ������� �������� ����(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    J. Watrous,��� ������ �� ������� �������� ����(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  13. [13]

    Skrzypczyk and D

    P. Skrzypczyk and D. Cavalcanti,����������� ����������� �� ������� ����������� �������, IOP Series in Quantum Technology (Institute of Physics Publishing, 2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Optimal Encoding of Classical Information in a Quantum Medium

    N. Elron and Y. C. Eldar, Optimal encod- ing of classical information in a quantum me- dium, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 53, 1900–1907 (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0601010 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1900

  15. [15]

    Heinosaari, L

    T. Heinosaari, L. Leppäjärvi, and M. Plávala, Encoding and decoding of information in gen- eral probabilistic theories, International Journal of Quantum Information22, 2440007 (2024), arXiv:2311.17522 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Anshu and S

    A. Anshu and S. Arunachalam, A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states, Nature Reviews Physics6, 59–69 (2024), arXiv:2305.20069 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Efficient quantum tomography

    R. O’Donnell and J. Wright, Efficient quantum tomography, arXiv e-prints (2015), arXiv:1508.01907 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective

    G. Tóth and I. Apellaniz, Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General47, 424006 (2014), arXiv:1405.4878 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    M. S. Alvim, K. Chatzikokolakis, A. McIver, C. Morgan, C. Palamidessi, and G. Smith, ��� ������� �� ������������ ����������� ���� (Springer, 2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    M. S. Alvim, K. Chatzikokolakis, C. Palamidessi, and G. Smith, Measuring information leakage using generalized gain functions, in���� ���� ���� �������� �������� ����������� ��������� (2012) pp. 265–279

    2012

  21. [21]

    M. S. Alvim, K. Chatzikokolakis, A. Mciver, C. Morgan, C. Palamidessi, and G. Smith, Ad- ditive and multiplicative notions of leakage, and their capacities, in���� ���� ���� �������� ��� ������ ����������� ���������(2014) pp. 308– 322

    2014

  22. [22]

    Espinoza and G

    B. Espinoza and G. Smith, Min-entropy as a re- source, Information and Computation226, 57–75 (2013), special Issue: Information Security as a Resource. 22

    2013

  23. [23]

    D. M. Smith and G. Smith, Tight bounds on information leakage from repeated independent runs, in���� ���� ���� �������� �������� ����������� ��������� �����(2017) pp. 318– 327

    2017

  24. [24]

    Köpf and G

    B. Köpf and G. Smith, Vulnerability bounds and leakage resilience of blinded cryptography under timing attacks, in���� ���� ���� �������� ��� ������ ����������� ���������(2010) pp. 44–56

    2010

  25. [25]

    Boreale, F

    M. Boreale, F. Pampaloni, and M. Paolini, Asymptoticinformation leakage underone-tryat- tacks, in����������� �� �������� ������� ��� ������������� ����������, edited by M. Hofmann (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

  26. [26]

    Boreale, F

    M. Boreale, F. Pampaloni, and M. Paolini, Quantitative information flow, with a view, in �������� �������� � ������� ����, edited by V. Atluri and C. Diaz (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011) pp. 588–606

    2011

  27. [27]

    Braun, K

    C. Braun, K. Chatzikokolakis, and C. Palam- idessi, Quantitative notions of leakage for one- try attacks, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Com- puter Science249, 75–91 (2009), proceedings of the 25th Conference on Mathematical Founda- tions of Programming Semantics (MFPS 2009)

    2009

  28. [28]

    A. W. Harrow, The Church of the Symmet- ric Subspace, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1308.6595 (2013), arXiv:1308.6595 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    A. A. Mele, Introduction to Haar Measure Tools in Quantum Information: A Beginner’s Tutorial, Quantum8, 1340 (2024), arXiv:2307.08956 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    A.AmbainisandJ.Emerson,Quantumt-designs: t-wise independence in the quantum world, arXiv e-prints , quant-ph/0701126 (2007), arXiv:quant- ph/0701126 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  31. [31]

    Reexamination of optimal quantum state estimation of pure states

    A. Hayashi, T. Hashimoto, and M. Horibe, Reex- amination of optimal quantum state estimation of pure states, Phys. Rev. A72, 032325 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0410207 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    Seymour and T

    P. Seymour and T. Zaslavsky, Averaging sets: A generalization of mean values and spherical designs, Advances in Mathematics52, 213–240 (1984)

    1984

  33. [33]

    Optimal asymptotic bounds for spherical designs

    A. Bondarenko, D. Radchenko, and M. Viazovska, Optimal asymptotic bounds for spherical designs, Annals of mathematics , 443–452 (2013), arXiv:1009.4407 [math.MG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [34]

    R. H. Hardin and N. J. A. Sloane, Spherical designs,���������������������������������, accessed: 2026-04-29

    2026

  35. [35]

    L. Cui, T. Schuster, F. Brandao, and H.-Y. Huang, Unitary designs in nearly optimal depth, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2507.06216 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Exact distinguishability between real-valued and complex-valued Haar random quantum states

    T. Nemoz, R. Alléaume, and P. Brown, Exact dis- tinguishability between real-valued and complex- valued Haar random quantum states, arXiv e- prints (2025), arXiv:2507.16939 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Arora and B

    S. Arora and B. Barak,������������� �������� ���� � ������ ��������(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    2009

  38. [38]

    Bavaresco, M

    J. Bavaresco, M. Murao, and M. T. Quintino, Unitary channel discrimination beyond group structures: Advantages of sequential and indefinite-causal-order strategies, Journal of Mathematical Physics63, 042203 (2022), arXiv:2105.13369 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Hausladen and W

    P. Hausladen and W. K. Wootters, A ‘pretty good’ measurement for distinguish- ing quantum states, Journal of Mod- ern Optics41, 2385–2390 (1994), ht- tps://doi.org/10.1080/09500349414552221

    work page doi:10.1080/09500349414552221 1994

  40. [40]

    T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas,�������� �� ����������� ������ ������ ������ �� ����� �������������� ��� ������ �����������(Wiley- Interscience, USA, 2006)

    2006

  41. [41]

    L. B. Vieira, S. Milz, G. Vitagliano, and C. Budroni, Witnessing environment dimension through temporal correlations, Quantum8, 1224 (2024), arXiv:2305.19175 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    OEIS Foundation Inc., Sequence A063170 (2026), the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, published electronically at����������������� �������

    2026

  43. [43]

    An identity conjectured by Lacasse via the tree function

    H. Prodinger, An identity conjectured by La- casse via the tree function, arXiv e-prints (2013), arXiv:1301.3669 [math.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    Flajolet, P

    P. Flajolet, P. J. Grabner, P. Kirschenhofer, and H. Prodinger, On ramanujan’s q-function, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathem- atics58, 103–116 (1995)

    1995

  45. [45]

    P. E. Frenkel and M. Weiner, Classical Inform- ation Storage in an n-Level Quantum System, Communications in Mathematical Physics340, 563–574 (2015), arXiv:1304.5723 [cs.IT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Heinosaari and M

    T. Heinosaari and M. Hillery, Can a qudit carry more information than a dit?, Contempor- ary Physics65, 2–11 (2024), arXiv:2406.16566 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Jacquet and W

    P. Jacquet and W. Szpankowski, Entropy com- putations via analytic depoissonization, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory45, 1072– 1081 (1999)

    1999

  48. [48]

    How to evaluate n∑ k=0 √(n k )

    robjohn, Answer to "How to evaluate n∑ k=0 √(n k ) ", Mathematics Stack Exchange, version 2014-07- 15

    2014

  49. [49]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe,������ �������� �����(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    2004

  50. [50]

    A hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for Bayes-optimal quantum state discrimination using the source code

    A. Mohan, J. Sikora, and S. Upadhyay, A gener- alized framework for quantum state discrimina- tion, hybrid algorithms, and the quantum change 23 point problem, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2312.04023 (2023), arXiv:2312.04023 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1412.6980v9 (2017), arXiv:1412.6980 [cs.LG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    ApS,����� ������(2025)

    M. ApS,����� ������(2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Kvashchuk, GitHub repository: The most dis- criminable quantum states in the multicopy re- gime (2026)

    M. Kvashchuk, GitHub repository: The most dis- criminable quantum states in the multicopy re- gime (2026)

    2026

  54. [54]

    A. C. Doherty, P. A. Parrilo, and F. M. Sped- alieri, Complete family of separability criteria, Phys. Rev. A69, 022308 (2004)

    2004

  55. [55]

    C. M. Caves, C. A. Fuchs, and R. Schack, Un- known quantum states: The quantum de Finetti representation, Journal of Mathematical Physics 43, 4537–4559 (2002)

    2002

  56. [56]

    Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys

    A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1413–1415 (1996)

    1996

  57. [57]

    Diamond and S

    S. Diamond and S. Boyd, CVXPY: A Python- embedded modeling language for convex optim- ization, Journal of Machine Learning Research 17, 1–5 (2016)

    2016

  58. [58]

    Agrawal, R

    A. Agrawal, R. Verschueren, S. Diamond, and S. Boyd, A rewriting system for convex optimiz- ation problems, Journal of Control and Decision 5, 42–60 (2018)

    2018

  59. [59]

    O’Donoghue, Operator splitting for a homo- geneous embedding of the linear complementar- ity problem, SIAM Journal on Optimization31, 1999–2023 (2021)

    B. O’Donoghue, Operator splitting for a homo- geneous embedding of the linear complementar- ity problem, SIAM Journal on Optimization31, 1999–2023 (2021)

    1999

  60. [60]

    L. B. Vieira, GitHub repository: The most dis- criminable quantum states in the multicopy re- gime (2026)

    2026

  61. [61]

    An and X

    C. An and X. Zhuang, A Survey on Spher- ical Designs: Existence, Numerical Construc- tions, and Applications, arXiv e-prints (2026), arXiv:2601.11963 [cs.NA]

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Plávala, General probabilistic theories: An introduction, Physics Reports1033, 1–64 (2023), arXiv:2103.07469 [quant-ph]

    M. Plávala, General probabilistic theories: An introduction, Physics Reports1033, 1–64 (2023), arXiv:2103.07469 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Barrett, Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories, arXiv e-prints , quant- ph/0508211 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0508211 [quant-ph]

    J. Barrett, Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories, arXiv e-prints , quant- ph/0508211 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0508211 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2005

  64. [64]

    L. J. Dmello, L. T. Ligthart, and D. Gross, En- tanglement swapping in generalized probabilistic theories and iterated Clauser-Horne-Shimony- Holt games, Phys. Rev. A110, 022225 (2024), arXiv:2405.13819 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Emergence of Quantum Correlations from Non-Locality Swapping

    P. Skrzypczyk, N. Brunner, and S. Popescu, Emergence of Quantum Correlations from Non- locality Swapping, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 110402 (2009), arXiv:0811.2937 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  66. [66]

    Entanglement swapping for generalized non-local correlations

    T. Short, S. Popescu, and N. Gisin, Entangle- ment swapping for generalized non-local correla- tions, arXiv e-prints , quant-ph/0508120 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0508120 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  67. [67]

    L. J. Dmello and D. Gross, Probabilistic the- ories stable under teleportation, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.21347 (2026), arXiv:2603.21347 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Matsumoto and G

    K. Matsumoto and G. Kimura, Information stor- ing yields a point-asymmetry of state space in general probabilistic theories, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1802.01162 (2018), arXiv:1802.01162 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    Most incompatible measurements for robust steering tests

    J. Bavaresco, M. T. Quintino, L. Guerini, T. O. Maciel, D. Cavalcanti, and M. T. Cunha, Most incompatible measurements for robust steer- ing tests, Phys. Rev. A96, 022110 (2017), arXiv:1704.02994 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Achenbach, L

    T. Achenbach, L. Leppäjärvi, L. Hanwool, and T. Heinosaari, Nonclassical traits in multi-copy state discrimination (2026), arXiv:2604.xxxx [quant-ph]

    2026

  71. [71]

    left” and “right

    P. Delsarte, J. Goethals, and J. Seidel, Spherical codes and designs, in�������� ��� ��������� �����, edited by D. Corneil and R. Mathon (Aca- demic Press, 1991) pp. 68–93. 24 Appendix A Summary of results for two-dimensional systems The table below presents the values ofΩ(d= 2,N,k), including analytical and numerical calculations. � � �� � ���� ���� � � ...

    1991