arxiv: 2606.09980 · v1 · pith:JOOBXPQDnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · ✦ hep-th

Where is tree-level heterotic string theory?

Mathieu Boisvert , Waltraut Knop , Leonardo Rastelli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords S-matrix bootstrapheterotic stringRegge trajectoriessupergravityhalf-maximal supersymmetrytree-level amplitudesUV completionscrossing symmetry

0

0 comments

The pith

Linear Regge trajectories explain much of the allowed region boundary in the 10D half-maximal supersymmetry bootstrap.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the tree-level S-matrix bootstrap to ten-dimensional theories with half-maximal supersymmetry, a setting that includes the heterotic string. It imposes analyticity, crossing symmetry, unitarity, and Regge boundedness to constrain weakly coupled UV completions of supergravity and super Yang-Mills. In the gravitational sector the results show that the boundary of the allowed region is largely accounted for by extremal amplitudes on a single linear Regge trajectory or by convex combinations of such amplitudes. The gluon sector instead reveals a tension between representation-channel positivity and trace decomposition of EFT data. Overall the work supports linear Regge trajectories as a persistent feature of the bootstrap even when supersymmetry is reduced and non-planar sectors are included.

Core claim

In ten-dimensional half-maximally supersymmetric theories the boundary of the allowed region for weakly coupled UV completions of supergravity is largely explained by extremal amplitudes supported on a single linear Regge trajectory, or by convex combinations of such amplitudes; the non-planar gauge sector shows an obstruction to direct normalization by G or g_YM that may require a coupled bootstrap.

What carries the argument

Extremal amplitudes supported on a single linear Regge trajectory that saturate the bounds from analyticity, crossing symmetry, unitarity, and Regge boundedness in the gravitational sector.

If this is right

Much of the gravitational sector boundary is explained by amplitudes on a single linear Regge trajectory or convex combinations thereof.
The gluon sector exhibits tension between representation-channel positivity and the trace decomposition of EFT data.
Direct normalization by the gravitational or gauge coupling is obstructed in the non-planar problem.
A coupled gluon/graviton bootstrap may be needed to constrain the relative strength of gauge and gravitational interactions.
Linear Regge trajectories appear as a robust feature of the tree-level quantum-gravity bootstrap.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The heterotic string may correspond to one of the extremal single-trajectory amplitudes in the bootstrap space.
The same bootstrap methods could locate string-like points in theories with other supersymmetry amounts.
Numerical refinement could check whether every boundary point is covered by single-trajectory amplitudes.
The gluon-sector tension indicates that gauge and gravity strengths are more tightly linked than separate bootstraps can capture.

Load-bearing premise

The premise that the boundary of the allowed region in the gravitational sector is explained by extremal amplitudes on a single linear Regge trajectory or convex combinations thereof.

What would settle it

An allowed amplitude in the gravitational sector that cannot be expressed as a convex combination of single linear Regge trajectory amplitudes, or bootstrap output showing the boundary not saturated by such trajectories.

read the original abstract

We continue the tree-level S-matrix bootstrap program for quantum gravity, now in ten-dimensional theories with half-maximal supersymmetry. This setting includes the heterotic string and allows us to test whether the string-like structures found in the maximally supersymmetric bootstrap persist with less supersymmetry and in non-planar gauge sectors. Imposing analyticity, crossing symmetry, unitarity, and Regge boundedness, we constraint weakly coupled UV completions of supergravity and super Yang-Mills. In the gravitational sector, much of the boundary of the allowed region is explained by extremal amplitudes supported on a single linear Regge trajectory, or by convex combinations of such amplitudes. In the gluon sector, the non-planar problem reveals a tension between representation-channel positivity and the trace decomposition of the EFT data, obstructing a direct normalization by $G$ or $g_{\rm YM}$; a coupled gluon/graviton bootstrap may be necessary to directly constrain the relative strength of gauge and gravitational interactions. Overall, our results support the emergence of linear Regge trajectories as a robust feature of the tree-level quantum-gravity bootstrap.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The bootstrap still finds linear Regge trajectories explaining much of the gravitational boundary under half-maximal SUSY, but the gluon sector introduces a new tension between positivity and trace structure that blocks direct normalization.

read the letter

The main point is that linear Regge trajectories remain a robust feature when the bootstrap is run in ten dimensions with half-maximal supersymmetry. The gravitational-sector boundary is still largely accounted for by extremal amplitudes on single trajectories or their convex combinations, even though supersymmetry is reduced and non-planar gauge sectors are included.

What is new is the explicit test of that robustness outside maximal supersymmetry, plus the identification of a concrete obstruction in the gluon sector: representation-channel positivity conflicts with the trace decomposition of the EFT data. This tension prevents a direct normalization by the gauge or gravitational coupling and is not reported in the earlier maximal-SUSY papers cited in the abstract. The authors therefore flag that a coupled gluon-graviton bootstrap may be needed.

The work is carried out by imposing the standard assumptions of analyticity, crossing, unitarity, and Regge boundedness, then mapping the allowed region numerically or analytically. The Regge explanation is presented as an empirical observation about the shape of the boundary rather than a derived necessity.

A soft spot is that the gluon-sector tension is left unresolved; the paper notes the problem but does not pursue the coupled bootstrap that would be required to fix the relative strength of the interactions. How much of the gravitational boundary is actually saturated by the single-trajectory amplitudes is also stated without a quantitative breakdown in the abstract, so the strength of the “much of the boundary” claim is hard to judge from the summary alone.

This paper is for readers already working inside the S-matrix bootstrap program for quantum gravity. Someone tracking how string-like features survive changes in supersymmetry or gauge content will find the new tension useful. It is a natural next step in an ongoing line of work and deserves a serious referee.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript continues the tree-level S-matrix bootstrap for quantum gravity in ten-dimensional half-maximally supersymmetric theories, including the heterotic string. Imposing analyticity, crossing symmetry, unitarity, and Regge boundedness, the authors constrain weakly coupled UV completions of supergravity and super Yang-Mills. In the gravitational sector, much of the boundary of the allowed region is reported to be explained by extremal amplitudes supported on a single linear Regge trajectory or convex combinations thereof. In the gluon sector, a tension is identified between representation-channel positivity and the trace decomposition of EFT data, suggesting that a coupled gluon/graviton bootstrap may be needed. The results are presented as supporting the emergence of linear Regge trajectories as a robust feature of the tree-level quantum-gravity bootstrap.

Significance. If the numerical bootstrap results hold under the stated assumptions, the work would provide evidence that linear Regge trajectories arise generically from consistency conditions even with reduced supersymmetry, extending prior maximal-SUSY analyses. It also flags a concrete obstruction in the non-planar gauge sector that may require joint gravity-gauge bootstraps, contributing to the program of deriving string-like structures from S-matrix axioms alone.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and gravitational-sector results] Abstract and the gravitational-sector analysis: the assertion that 'much of the boundary ... is explained by extremal amplitudes supported on a single linear Regge trajectory' is presented as an empirical observation, but the manuscript does not supply an explicit construction or quantitative measure (e.g., overlap fraction or distance to the boundary) showing that these trajectories saturate the bounds without post-hoc parameter adjustment; this interpretation step is load-bearing for the central claim of robustness.
[Gluon sector] Gluon-sector discussion: the reported tension between representation-channel positivity and trace decomposition of the EFT data is stated qualitatively without a concrete inequality, numerical example, or bound demonstrating the incompatibility; without this, it is unclear whether the obstruction is fundamental or resolvable within the current single-sector setup, directly affecting the recommendation for a coupled bootstrap.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states that the results 'support the emergence' of linear Regge trajectories, but the manuscript should clarify whether this conclusion rests on numerical sampling or on an analytic argument that would survive changes in the cutoff or basis choice.
Notation for the Regge trajectory parameters and the precise definition of 'extremal amplitudes' should be introduced earlier and used consistently when describing the boundary saturation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and gravitational-sector results] Abstract and the gravitational-sector analysis: the assertion that 'much of the boundary ... is explained by extremal amplitudes supported on a single linear Regge trajectory' is presented as an empirical observation, but the manuscript does not supply an explicit construction or quantitative measure (e.g., overlap fraction or distance to the boundary) showing that these trajectories saturate the bounds without post-hoc parameter adjustment; this interpretation step is load-bearing for the central claim of robustness.

Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this observation. The manuscript reports the boundary saturation as an empirical finding from the numerical bootstrap results, but does not include an explicit construction of the extremal amplitudes or quantitative metrics such as overlap fractions. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection describing the construction of the single linear Regge trajectory amplitudes, together with quantitative comparisons (e.g., distance to boundary points in the space of Wilson coefficients) to make the claim more precise and reproducible. revision: yes
Referee: [Gluon sector] Gluon-sector discussion: the reported tension between representation-channel positivity and trace decomposition of the EFT data is stated qualitatively without a concrete inequality, numerical example, or bound demonstrating the incompatibility; without this, it is unclear whether the obstruction is fundamental or resolvable within the current single-sector setup, directly affecting the recommendation for a coupled bootstrap.

Authors: We agree that a concrete demonstration is needed to assess the nature of the obstruction. The current text describes the tension qualitatively. In the revision we will insert an explicit numerical example, including a derived inequality between the representation-channel positivity bounds and the trace-decomposition constraints on the EFT coefficients, to illustrate the incompatibility and to clarify whether it persists in the single-sector bootstrap. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper imposes the standard external bootstrap conditions of analyticity, crossing symmetry, unitarity, and Regge boundedness on weakly coupled UV completions of supergravity and super Yang-Mills in 10D half-maximal SUSY. It then reports an empirical observation that much of the gravitational-sector boundary of the allowed region is saturated by extremal amplitudes supported on single linear Regge trajectories (or convex combinations). This interpretation is presented as a numerical/analytical finding from the bootstrap output rather than a deductive reduction to the inputs by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatzes smuggled via citation are identifiable from the abstract and surrounding context. The derivation remains self-contained against the stated external assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard S-matrix bootstrap assumptions listed in the abstract; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the provided text.

axioms (4)

domain assumption Analyticity of the S-matrix
Imposed to constrain UV completions of supergravity and SYM.
domain assumption Crossing symmetry
Standard requirement in the bootstrap program.
domain assumption Unitarity
Imposed to ensure physical consistency of amplitudes.
domain assumption Regge boundedness
Key assumption that enables linear Regge trajectories to saturate the allowed region.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5719 in / 1495 out tokens · 30540 ms · 2026-06-27T15:23:45.299258+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Bootstrapping Pion Form Factors at Large $N$
hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Bootstrap analysis of meromorphic observables in large-N QCD yields universal and SVZ-type bounds that constrain chiral Lagrangian parameters and link hadronic data to asymptotic freedom.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 8 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Kruczenski, J

M. Kruczenski, J. Penedones and B.C. van Rees,Snowmass White Paper: S-matrix Bootstrap,2203.02421

arXiv
[2]

de Rham, S

C. de Rham, S. Kundu, M. Reece, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou,Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.06805]

arXiv 2021
[3]

Albert, W

J. Albert, W. Knop and L. Rastelli,Where is tree-level string theory?,JHEP02(2025) 157 [2406.12959]

arXiv 2025
[4]

Caron-Huot, D

S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli and D. Simmons-Duffin,Sharp boundaries for the swampland,JHEP07(2021) 110 [2102.08951]

arXiv 2021
[5]

Caron-Huot, Y.-Z

S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and D. Simmons-Duffin,Causality constraints on corrections to Einstein gravity,JHEP05(2023) 122 [2201.06602]

arXiv 2023
[6]

Caron-Huot, Y.-Z

S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and D. Simmons-Duffin,Graviton partial waves and causality in higher dimensions,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 026007 [2205.01495]

arXiv 2023
[7]

Pasiecznik,Bootstrapping Gravity with Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations, 2506.09884

C. Pasiecznik,Bootstrapping Gravity with Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations, 2506.09884

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[8]

Arkani-Hamed, T.-C

N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang and Y.-t. Huang,The EFT-Hedron,JHEP05(2021) 259 [2012.15849]

arXiv 2021
[9]

Bellazzini, J

B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Mir´ o, R. Rattazzi, M. Riembau and F. Riva,Positive moments for scattering amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 036006 [2011.00037]

arXiv 2021
[10]

Tolley, Z.-Y

A.J. Tolley, Z.-Y. Wang and S.-Y. Zhou,New positivity bounds from full crossing symmetry, JHEP05(2021) 255 [2011.02400]

arXiv 2021
[11]

Caron-Huot and V

S. Caron-Huot and V. Van Duong,Extremal Effective Field Theories,JHEP05(2021) 280 [2011.02957]

arXiv 2021
[12]

Berman, H

J. Berman, H. Elvang and A. Herderschee,Flattening of the EFT-hedron: supersymmetric positivity bounds and the search for string theory,JHEP03(2024) 021 [2310.10729]

arXiv 2024
[13]

Berman and H

J. Berman and H. Elvang,Corners and islands in the S-matrix bootstrap of the open superstring,JHEP09(2024) 076 [2406.03543]. – 45 –

arXiv 2024
[14]

Guerrieri, J

A. Guerrieri, J. Penedones and P. Vieira,Where Is String Theory in the Space of Scattering Amplitudes?,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 081601 [2102.02847]

arXiv 2021
[15]

Guerrieri, H

A. Guerrieri, H. Murali, J. Penedones and P. Vieira,Where is M-theory in the space of scattering amplitudes?,JHEP06(2023) 064 [2212.00151]

arXiv 2023
[16]

Elvang, A

H. Elvang, A. Herderschee and R. Morales,String Theory from Maximal Supersymmetry, 2601.11705

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[17]

Arkani-Hamed, C

N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Cheung, C. Figueiredo and G.N. Remmen,Multiparticle Factorization and the Rigidity of String Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 091601 [2312.07652]

arXiv 2024
[18]

Cheung and G.N

C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen,Veneziano variations: how unique are string amplitudes?, JHEP01(2023) 122 [2210.12163]

arXiv 2023
[19]

Cheung, A

C. Cheung, A. Hillman and G.N. Remmen,Bootstrap Principle for the Spectrum and Scattering of Strings,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 251601 [2406.02665]

arXiv 2024
[20]

Cheung and G.N

C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen,Multipositivity bounds for scattering amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) 016017 [2505.05553]

arXiv 2025
[21]

Cheung, G.N

C. Cheung, G.N. Remmen, F. Sciotti and M. Tarquini,Strings from Almost Nothing, 2508.09246

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[22]

Eckner, F

C. Eckner, F. Figueroa and P. Tourkine,On the number of Regge trajectories for dual amplitudes,JHEP02(2025) 103 [2405.21057]

arXiv 2025
[23]

Eckner, F

C. Eckner, F. Figueroa, S. Metayer and P. Tourkine,Regge trajectories for UV completions of graviton scattering from polynomial boundedness,2512.17828

arXiv
[24]

Alvarez-Gaum´ e and E

L. Alvarez-Gaum´ e and E. Witten,Gravitational Anomalies,Nucl. Phys. B234(1984) 269

1984
[25]

Green and J.H

M.B. Green and J.H. Schwarz,Anomaly Cancellations in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory,Phys. Lett. B149(1984) 117

1984
[26]

Adams, O

A. Adams, O. DeWolfe and W. Taylor,String universality in ten dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 071601 [1006.1352]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[27]

Elvang and Y.-t

H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang,Scattering Amplitudes,1308.1697

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[28]

Camanho, J.D

X.O. Camanho, J.D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov,Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling,JHEP02(2016) 020 [1407.5597]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[29]

Chandorkar, S.D

D. Chandorkar, S.D. Chowdhury, S. Kundu and S. Minwalla,Bounds on Regge growth of flat space scattering from bounds on chaos,JHEP05(2021) 143 [2102.03122]

arXiv 2021
[30]

Chowdhury, A

S.D. Chowdhury, A. Gadde, T. Gopalka, I. Halder, L. Janagal and S. Minwalla,Classifying and constraining local four photon and four graviton S-matrices,JHEP02(2020) 114 [1910.14392]

arXiv 2020
[31]

H¨ aring and A

K. H¨ aring and A. Zhiboedov,Gravitational Regge bounds,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 034 [2202.08280]

arXiv 2024
[32]

Goddard and C.B

P. Goddard and C.B. Thorn,Compatibility of the dual pomeron with unitarity and the absence of ghosts in the dual resonance model,Physics Letters B40(1972) 235

1972
[33]

K. Aoki, E. D’Hoker and D.H. Phong,Unitarity of closed superstring perturbation theory, Nuclear Physics B342(1990) 149

1990
[34]

Kawai, D

H. Kawai, D. Lewellen and S.-H. Tye,A relation between tree amplitudes of closed and open strings,Nuclear Physics B269(1986) 1. – 46 –

1986
[35]

Basu,Low momentum expansion of one loop amplitudes in heterotic string theory,JHEP 11(2017) 139 [1708.08409]

A. Basu,Low momentum expansion of one loop amplitudes in heterotic string theory,JHEP 11(2017) 139 [1708.08409]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[36]

Green, J.H

M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten,Superstring Theory: Volume 1, Introduction, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (1987)

1987
[37]

Berman, H

J. Berman, H. Elvang, N. Geiser and L.L. Lin,Bootstrapping Extremal Scalar Amplitudes With and Without Supersymmetry,2412.13368

arXiv
[38]

Albert and L

J. Albert and L. Rastelli,Bootstrapping pions at large N. Part II. Background gauge fields and the chiral anomaly,JHEP09(2024) 039 [2307.01246]

arXiv 2024
[39]

Simmons-Duffin,A Semidefinite Program Solver for the Conformal Bootstrap,JHEP06 (2015) 174 [1502.02033]

D. Simmons-Duffin,A Semidefinite Program Solver for the Conformal Bootstrap,JHEP06 (2015) 174 [1502.02033]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[40]

Albert, J

J. Albert, J. Henriksson, L. Rastelli and A. Vichi,Bootstrapping mesons at large N: Regge trajectory from spin-two maximization,JHEP09(2024) 172 [2312.15013]

arXiv 2024
[41]

Cvitanovic,Group Theory: Birdtracks, Lie’s, and Exceptional Groups, Princeton University Press (5, 2020)

P. Cvitanovic,Group Theory: Birdtracks, Lie’s, and Exceptional Groups, Princeton University Press (5, 2020)

2020
[42]

Albert and L

J. Albert and L. Rastelli,Bootstrapping pions at large N,JHEP08(2022) 151 [2203.11950]

arXiv 2022
[43]

Berman and N

J. Berman and N. Geiser,Analytic bootstrap bounds on masses and spins in gravitational and non-gravitational scalar theories,JHEP06(2025) 168 [2412.17902]. – 47 –

arXiv 2025