Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

A single exact quantisation condition, built from two quantum periods and their resummed transseries, captures the quasinormal-mode spectrum of the planar AdS5 black brane across the entire wave-number range, from large q down to q=0.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 11:45 UTC pith:6UOH67KH

load-bearing objection Strong exact-WKB/resurgence paper with a genuinely load-bearing Stokes-sector restriction; the large-q result is solid, the q→0 claim is a sketch. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2606.12529 v2 pith:6UOH67KH submitted 2026-06-10 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.CAmath.MP

Analytic approaches to perturbations of strongly coupled Yang-Mills plasma

In\^es Aniceto , Paolo Arnaudo , Alex Ratcliffe , Micha{\l} Spali\'nski This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.CAmath.MP MSC 81T3034E2081Q20
keywords quasinormal modesAdS black branesexact WKBSeiberg–Witten theoryNekrasov–Shatashvili limitresurgenceHeun equationholographic plasma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that the quasinormal-mode frequencies of strongly coupled Yang-Mills plasma — modelled as scalar perturbations of a planar AdS5 black brane — are governed by an exact quantisation condition written in terms of two quantum periods. In the Seiberg–Witten formulation, truncating the boundary-value problem is equivalent to truncating an instanton series whose convergence radius |t|=1/2 explains why ordinary spectral truncation fails at large wave number q or overtone N. In the complementary exact-WKB formulation, the same condition α=2πi(N+1/2)∓log(1+e^β) is exact in the instanton parameter and asymptotic in q^-1; once its transseries is Borel-resummed, it yields frequencies accurate far beyond the strict large-q regime, with absolute errors down to 10^-30. If correct, this gives a controlled analytic description of the entire QNM spectrum from q=0 to infinity and removes the root-selection ambiguity of truncated spectral methods.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the scalar-channel QNM problem of the planar AdS5 black brane is exactly described by a quantum Seiberg–Witten curve in the Nekrasov–Shatashvili limit, and that the associated exact-WKB quantisation condition (4.18) — with the A-period α and B-period β satisfying β(q)=α(iq) — encodes all perturbative and non-perturbative corrections. After Borel–Laplace resummation of the divergent large-q series, the resulting large-q expansion (6.1) reproduces independently computed frequencies with absolute errors between 7.6×10^-10 and 1.9×10^-30 over the tested range, and the same expansion can be continued to q=0 by using the Seiberg–Witten data as a seed. The paper furthe

What carries the argument

The central object is the Heun differential equation with four regular singular points that describes the perturbation, together with its two complementary analytic descriptions: the Seiberg–Witten/NS quantum periods (whose instanton expansion in the counting parameter t is controlled by the Matone relation and a continued-fraction representation), and the exact-WKB Stokes graph, whose two period integrals α and β encode the A- and B-cycles of a genus-one curve. The bridge between them is the perturbative/non-perturbative relation β(q)=α(iq), a consequence of the z→-z, q→iq symmetry. Borel–Laplace resummation and median summation give the divergent period series meaning and remove lateral-su

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the sector selection made between eq. (4.16) and figure 7: the EQC is derived only for 1−s^2≪1 with Im s<0 and Re s>0, discarding other Stokes-topology sectors on the basis of prior numerical expectations, and the boundary constant K=i is fixed by matching to a Bessel reference problem rather than by a first-principles boundary analysis; if the physical branch ever enters another sector, the quantisation condition must be re-derived.

What would settle it

Take a point in the (N,q) plane where arg(1−s^2) crosses outside the assumed range (π/2, π) — for instance a complex q, or a high overtone at moderate q — compute the QNM frequency by independent high-precision spectral numerics, and compare with the prediction of (4.18) continued to that point; a mismatch would show that the discarded Stokes sector contributes and the connection formula is incomplete.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The full scalar QNM spectrum of the planar AdS5 black brane is captured by one exact quantisation condition, so individual frequencies and their q-dependence can be generated analytically rather than by root-finding on truncated polynomials.
  • Truncation-based spectral methods are placed on a controlled footing: their failure at large q and N is diagnosed by the instanton-series radius |t|=1/2, not by a breakdown of the underlying equation.
  • The resummed large-q expansion remains accurate down to q≈1/2 and can be continued to q=0, providing dispersion relations ω(N,q) across the whole range.
  • The non-perturbative structure of the spectrum is explicit: exponentially small corrections in N are governed by the B-period and follow a perturbative/non-perturbative relation, with lateral resummation ambiguities cancelled exactly.
  • The same combination of Seiberg–Witten and exact-WKB methods can be exported to other holographic channels, starting with the shear channel.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: a testable extension is to push the same EQC into the complex-q plane; the paper leaves the Stokes phenomenon for complex q open, and one would expect new non-perturbative sectors to appear as arg(q) varies.
  • Editorial inference: the PNP relation β(q)=α(iq) suggests that the large-N and large-q expansions are not independent; this could be used to bootstrap higher-order coefficients from lower-order ones in other spectral problems with similar symmetries.
  • Editorial inference: the explicit convergence-radius picture (|t|=1/2) gives a quantitative criterion for when any continued-fraction/QNM truncation should be abandoned in favour of a resummed WKB description, which could be applied to Kerr and other black-hole perturbation problems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops two complementary analytic descriptions of scalar quasinormal modes (QNMs) of the planar AdS5 black brane. The first is a Seiberg-Witten / Heun description in which the QNM condition is written as an instanton expansion in a counting parameter t, evaluated at the physical value t=1/2; the paper shows that this expansion loses efficiency as q or the overtone N grows, with the physical point approaching the Padé-determined convergence radius |t|=1/2. The second and central part is an exact-WKB analysis in which 1/q plays the role of a small parameter. The paper derives exact quantisation conditions (EQCs), Eq. (4.18), in terms of the periods α, β and the Stokes graph, develops a transseries/Borel-resummation procedure for the divergent large-q expansions, and reports accurate resummed QNM frequencies for q from 10 to 160 and N=1,...,5, including absolute errors down to 1e-30 (Table 4). It then uses the WKB result as a seed for the Seiberg-Witten continuation towards q=0, presenting a proof-of-concept comparison of ω(0) and a consistency check of the fundamental branch.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a substantial methodological advance: it ties the standard truncation-based spectral method to Seiberg-Witten/NS data, provides a structural explanation of why truncation degrades at large q or N, and then replaces the inefficient expansion by an exact-WKB transseries whose resummation reproduces independent numerics to very high precision. The explicit cancellation of nonperturbative ambiguities across transseries sectors (Table 3, imaginary parts dropping from ~1e-4 to ~1e-29) and the parameter-free recursion for subleading large-q coefficients are particularly strong points. The paper is also unusually explicit about the limits of its own arguments, repeatedly stating where a derivation is empirical or deferred. The main limitation, as discussed below, is that the advertised 'full spectrum' and 'all the way to q=0' claims are established only inside a restricted Stokes sector and for real positive q; this is a load-bearing caveat rather than a presentation issue.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.3, Figs. 6–7, App. D.1] The EQC (4.18) is derived only under the sector assumptions (4.16): 1−s² ≪ 1 with Im(s)<0, Re(s)>0, which selects two allowed Stokes graphs and excludes the critical graph at arg(1−s²)=θ_c. The authors do not prove that the physical branch remains in this sector as q varies, as N changes, or for complex q; §7 explicitly defers the complex-q Stokes analysis. A crossing of θ_c would change the sign in (4.18) and, more seriously, the connection matrices (D.18)/(D.19), hence the entire frequency ladder. Table 4 tests only real q and N≤5, and some of those points (e.g. N=5, q=10, where |1−s²|∼6.7) are far from the assumption (4.16); the paper treats (4.31) as an 'organising principle' rather than a proven validity bound. This is the central load-bearing caveat: the 'full spectrum' claim should be either proven for all physical branches or explicitly restricted to the tested Stokes sector.
  2. [§6.1, footnote 18, Table 4] For N=1,...,5 the leading large-q coefficient E is imported from the independent numerical spectral solution of [32], rather than predicted by the WKB/EQC construction. Thus the excellent agreement in Table 4 for these rows validates the subleading coefficients and the resummation, but it does not provide a fully first-principles test of the leading-order prediction for the lowest overtones. The text should state this distinction more prominently, especially because the abstract and introduction emphasise an 'analytic' determination of the spectrum. For N>5 the transseries calculation is claimed to be comparably accurate, but no table analogous to Table 4 is shown for N>5; adding such a check would strengthen the claim.
  3. [§5.3–§5.4, §6.1] The cancellation of nonperturbative ambiguities is demonstrated numerically to two sectors and to a finite truncation order: Table 3 shows imaginary parts decreasing to ~1e-29, not exact zero, and the Borel-plane analysis in §5.4 shows that for larger n the singularity structure becomes increasingly unclear. Moreover, §6.1 explicitly states that with the current accuracy 'we cannot exclude the possibility that there is a branch point along the real axis and that there are non-perturbative terms for real positive q.' Since the resummation is performed along a contour slightly below the real axis, the presence of such a branch point would introduce an uncancelled ambiguity. The paper gives plausible Stokes-graph evidence that the branch cut is absent for real positive q, but this is an empirical check, not a proof. The central claim of an exact and unambiguous resummation would be put on f
minor comments (5)
  1. [§D heading] Typographical error: 'exaxt quantisation condition' should read 'exact quantisation condition'.
  2. [§4.5 vs. Appendix A] The symbol ℏ is used for two unrelated quantities: ℏ=(q/E)^{-4/3} in Eq. (4.29) and the usual NS/quantum-curve parameter in Appendix A. The text notes this explicitly only in passing; a different symbol in one of the places would avoid reader confusion.
  3. [§3.2–§3.3] The statement that the convergence radius |t|=1/2 is controlled by Padé-pole flow is empirical; the paper itself correctly notes that no rigorous convergence theorem exists for the NS-limit instanton series. This should be labelled a conjecture/observation rather than a theorem, especially in the summary of the construction.
  4. [Table 1 and [32]] The table captions refer to 'table IV in [32]' with inconsistent formatting; please harmonise the notation and specify which rows are independent numerical values.
  5. [§6.2, Table 5] The q=0 extraction is presented as a 'proof of concept' with qualitative agreement, yet the abstract states the result can be continued 'all the way to q=0'. Please calibrate the abstract and concluding claims to the demonstrated accuracy, or provide a more systematic error-controlled continuation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Partial benchmarking circularity: for N=1..5 the leading large-q coefficient is taken from the same [32] numerics used for validation, though the EQC derivation itself is self-contained.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 6.1, near eq. (6.3) and Table 4]
    "Specifically, for N=1,...,5 we obtain E via the numerical method outlined in appendix B of [32]. ... Absolute error of the resummation S0−[ω(N,q)−q] of the large-q expansion (6.1) compared with the numerically calculated values, for various values of N and q."

    E is defined through (4.27)-(4.28) as E = q(1−s^2)^{3/4} = (−2ω_1)^{3/4}, so it fixes the first subleading coefficient ω_1(N,∞) of the expansion (6.1) that Table 4 validates. For N=1..5 this E is taken from the same numerical spectral solutions of [32] against which Table 4 measures the error. The leading q^{-1/3} contribution to ω(N,q)−q is therefore an input, not a prediction; the table independently tests only the WKB-generated subleading coefficients ω_ℓ for ℓ≥2 in this small-N range. The derivation of the EQC itself does not reduce by construction, but this headline numerical validation is partially circular.

full rationale

The exact quantisation condition (4.18) is derived in Appendix D from Stokes data and boundary conditions, with the constant K=i obtained by uniform-WKB matching to a Bessel reference problem; no step of that derivation defines α or β in terms of the final QNM frequencies. The period expansion (4.21), the recurrence for E_n (5.27), and the PNP relation (4.19) are algebraic consequences of the EQC and contain no fitted parameters. The central claim is therefore not circular at the level of the derivation. The main circularity burden is the validation in Table 4 for N=1..5: E, which is equivalent to the first subleading large-q coefficient ω_1(N,∞), is computed using the numerical method of [32], and the same [32] numerics are then used as the reference values for the absolute errors of the resummed ω(N,q)−q. Thus the leading part of the reported agreement is built in. This is partial benchmarking circularity, not a reduction of the whole derivation. The assumption (4.16) and the restriction to two Stokes graphs are informed by [32] numerics, but they are stated assumptions rather than circular equations. No self-citation chain is load-bearing: the cited SW-QNM and exact-WKB results come from independent groups, and the numerical reference [32] is external data, not the present authors' own prior result. Subleading coefficients and the continuation to q=0 are genuinely predicted, so the paper retains substantial independent content; the score reflects the fitted leading-order seed used in the headline validation table.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The core derivation is parameter-free in principle: the coefficients c_{m,k} come from Beta-function integrals (appendix D.3), and the recurrence (4.41)-(5.27) is exact formal algebra. The ledger items are the framework imports (exact-WKB connection data, Heun/NS connection technology), the sector restriction near s=1, and the procedural inputs E, truncation orders, and continuation parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • E(N), the q-independent leading large-q coefficient (≡ q(1−s²)^{3/4}) = e.g., ω1(N,∞)e^{iπ/3} = 4.46404110... from [32] cited in §4.5/table 2; per-N values from numerics for N=1..5
    For N=1,...,5, E is taken from the numerical solution of the spectral problem (appendix B of [32]) and used to build the resummed large-q expansion (table 4) and the seed at q*=4 (eq. 6.3). Only for N>5 is E produced by the paper's own transseries (§5.3). This is the central imported input.
  • Analytic-continuation procedure parameters = q*=5 and q*=4; tolerance 1e-2; Taylor order 10 (fig. 15); 98-100 resummation terms; Padé orders
    The ω(0) values in table 5 and the curves in figure 15 depend on these hand-chosen procedural values. The paper labels this approach 'naive' and a 'proof of concept', so these are procedural rather than physical free parameters.
  • Truncation orders = 12-13 instantons (§3), 119 transseries terms per sector (§5.3-5.4), 100 terms of the large-q series (§6.1), 100,000 recu
    Numerical results in tables 1, 3, 4 and figure 16 are stated at fixed truncation order; convergence is argued via Padé pole flow and optimal truncation, but no convergence proof is given for the instanton or large-q series.
axioms (6)
  • standard math Connection matrices for WKB solutions at simple turning points, with coefficient ±i (eq. 4.13)
    Imported from exact-WKB literature [33,44]; underlies the Stokes-jump bookkeeping that produces the EQC (4.18).
  • domain assumption The boundary linear combination at z=0 is fixed by uniform WKB against a Bessel reference potential, giving K=i (appendix D.2)
    The EQC changes if K differs; the uniform-WKB matching is standard [12,97], but the constant is not derived from a first-principles boundary analysis inside this paper.
  • domain assumption Stokes graph selection restricted to the sector 1−s²≪1 with Im s<0, Re s>0, arg(1−s²)∈(π/2+δ,π) (assumption (4.16) and surrounding text)
    This rules out other topological Stokes sectors; it is motivated by the numerics of [32] (table 1 and the discussion between eq. (4.16) and figure 6).
  • domain assumption Heun connection formula (3.2) and Nekrasov–Shatashvili free energy technology imported from [39] and [18] (AGT correspondence, appendix A)
    The SW-side quantisation condition (3.3)-(3.4) relies on the Liouville-CFT/gauge-theory connection formula from prior work; the dictionary is appended but the framework itself is imported.
  • ad hoc to paper The instanton expansion in t converges up to |t|=1/2 based on Padé pole flow (figure 2); no rigorous convergence theorem exists
    §3.2 concedes 'no rigorous results exist for the convergence properties of this series in t in the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit'; the diagnosis that the physical point approaches the boundary of convergence as q or N grow is numerical evidence, not a proof.
  • standard math Lateral Borel–Laplace resummations with the EQC fixing the transseries parameter (median summation, §5.1-5.3)
    Standard resurgence framework [45-47,62]; converts the formal large-q series into numbers and cancels ambiguities order by order.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 52760 in / 22705 out tokens · 230272 ms · 2026-08-02T11:45:14.572954+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study perturbations of Yang-Mills plasma, represented by scalar quasinormal modes of AdS black branes, as functions of the wave number $q$ in the entire range from zero to infinity. At finite $q$, these modes can be computed by classical spectral methods based on truncating the boundary value problem. We show that this truncation admits a natural analytic interpretation in terms of quantum Seiberg--Witten periods in the Nekrasov--Shatashvili limit, with the spectral condition organised as an instanton expansion around small values of the counting parameter. The physical black-brane problem corresponds to evaluating this series at a finite value of the counting parameter, and the Seiberg--Witten formulation provides a systematic way to analyse when the truncation is under control. In particular, it reveals that, as $q$ or the mode number $N$ increases, the physical point approaches the boundary of the domain of convergence of the instanton expansion, limiting the validity of the truncation approach. We overcome this limitation through an exact WKB analysis in which $q^{-1}$ acts as the expansion parameter. The resulting exact quantisation conditions, expressed in terms of period integrals and the associated Stokes geometry, incorporate both perturbative and non-perturbative corrections. The resummed quasinormal modes remain accurate far beyond the strict large-$q$ regime and can be analytically continued all the way to $q=0$, notably by using the Seiberg--Witten approach, providing a consistent description of the QNM spectrum.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. OPE = QNM

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.5

    OPE and QNM representations of the mixed retarded correlator overlap in complex time, giving an explicit map, sum rules, and new QNM asymptotics for large-N thermal CFTs.

  2. Which Saddles Contribute? The South-East Rule for Multidimensional Integrals

    math-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A geometric South-East rule combined with Borel-plane values and resurgence adjacency identifies contributing critical points for asymptotics of integrals e^{i k f(x)} over R^d without Picard-Lefschetz flows.

  3. Which Saddles Contribute? The South-East Rule for Multidimensional Integrals

    math-ph 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    A proposed "South-East rule" reads the directions of edges in a Borel-plane adjacency graph of critical values to decide, without steepest-descent flow computations, which complex and real saddles contribute to multid...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 66 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, “Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,”Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 163001,arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    Minkowski space correlators in AdS / CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications,

    D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Minkowski space correlators in AdS / CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications,”JHEP09(2002) 042,arXiv:hep-th/0205051

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  3. [3]

    From AdS / CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics,

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “From AdS / CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics,”JHEP09(2002) 043,arXiv:hep-th/0205052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Quasinormal modes of near extremal black branes,

    A. O. Starinets, “Quasinormal modes of near extremal black branes,”Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 124013,arXiv:hep-th/0207133

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  5. [5]

    AdS / CFT correspondence, quasinormal modes, and thermal correlators in N=4 SYM,

    A. Nunez and A. O. Starinets, “AdS / CFT correspondence, quasinormal modes, and thermal correlators in N=4 SYM,”Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 124013,arXiv:hep-th/0302026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Quasinormal modes and holography,

    P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, “Quasinormal modes and holography,”Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 086009,arXiv:hep-th/0506184. [7]LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,”Phys. Rev. Lett.116no. 6, (2016) 061102, arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  7. [8]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,

    E. Bertiet al., “Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,”arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]. [9]LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRACollaboration, A. G. Abacet al., “GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 11, (2025) 111403,arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [10]

    Rigorous Bounds on Transport from Causality,

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, and B. Withers, “Rigorous Bounds on Transport from Causality,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130no. 26, (2023) 261601,arXiv:2212.07434 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [11]

    The space of transport coefficients allowed by causality,

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, and B. Withers, “The space of transport coefficients allowed by causality,”Nature Phys.20no. 12, (2024) 1948–1954,arXiv:2305.07703 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [12]

    S. y. Slavyanov, W. Lay, and A. Seeger,Special Functions: A Unified Theory Based on Singularities. Oxford University Press, 09, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198505730.001.0001

    arXiv 2000

  11. [13]

    Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations,

    B. Withers, “Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations,”JHEP06(2018) 059,arXiv:1803.08058 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [14]

    Convergence of the Gradient Expansion in Hydrodynamics,

    S. Grozdanov, P. K. Kovtun, A. O. Starinets, and P. Tadi´ c, “Convergence of the Gradient Expansion in Hydrodynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.122no. 25, (2019) 251601, arXiv:1904.01018 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [15]

    The complex life of hydrodynamic modes,

    S. Grozdanov, P. K. Kovtun, A. O. Starinets, and P. Tadi´ c, “The complex life of hydrodynamic modes,”JHEP11(2019) 097,arXiv:1904.12862 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [16]

    Hydrodynamic gradient expansion in linear response theory,

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson, and B. Withers, “Hydrodynamic gradient expansion in linear response theory,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 6, (2021) 066002, arXiv:2007.05524 [hep-th]. – 69 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [17]

    Convergence of hydrodynamic modes: insights from kinetic theory and holography,

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson, and B. Withers, “Convergence of hydrodynamic modes: insights from kinetic theory and holography,”SciPost Phys.10no. 6, (2021) 123,arXiv:2012.15393 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [18]

    Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi, and Y. Hatsuda, “Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,”Annales Henri Poincare23no. 6, (2022) 1951–1977,arXiv:2006.06111 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  17. [19]

    Exact solution of Kerr black hole perturbations via CFT2 and instanton counting: Greybody factor, quasinormal modes, and Love numbers,

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, “Exact solution of Kerr black hole perturbations via CFT2 and instanton counting: Greybody factor, quasinormal modes, and Love numbers,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 4, (2022) 044047,arXiv:2105.04483 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [20]

    More on the SW-QNM correspondence,

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo, and J. F. Morales, “More on the SW-QNM correspondence,”JHEP01(2022) 024,arXiv:2109.09804 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [21]

    New method for exact results on quasinormal modes of black holes,

    D. Fioravanti and D. Gregori, “New method for exact results on quasinormal modes of black holes,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 12, (2025) 125020,arXiv:2112.11434 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [22]

    Holographic thermal correlators from supersymmetric instantons,

    M. Dodelson, A. Grassi, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig, and A. Zhiboedov, “Holographic thermal correlators from supersymmetric instantons,”SciPost Phys.14no. 5, (2023) 116, arXiv:2206.07720 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [23]

    Expansions for semiclassical conformal blocks,

    B. C. da Cunha and J. P. Cavalcante, “Expansions for semiclassical conformal blocks,” JHEP08(2024) 110,arXiv:2211.03551 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [24]

    Black hole perturbation theory and multiple polylogarithms,

    G. Aminov, P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, A. Grassi, and A. Tanzini, “Black hole perturbation theory and multiple polylogarithms,”JHEP11(2023) 059,arXiv:2307.10141 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [25]

    Quasinormal modes of C-metric from SCFTs,

    Y. Lei, H. Shu, K. Zhang, and R.-D. Zhu, “Quasinormal modes of C-metric from SCFTs,” JHEP02(2024) 140,arXiv:2308.16677 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [26]

    Holographic thermal correlators and quasinormal modes from semiclassical Virasoro blocks,

    H. F. Jia and M. Rangamani, “Holographic thermal correlators and quasinormal modes from semiclassical Virasoro blocks,”JHEP12(2024) 047,arXiv:2408.05208 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [27]

    Black hole scattering amplitudes via analytic small-frequency expansion and monodromy,

    G. Aminov and P. Arnaudo, “Black hole scattering amplitudes via analytic small-frequency expansion and monodromy,”JHEP03(2025) 115,arXiv:2409.06681 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [28]

    Exact low-temperature Green’s functions in AdS/CFT: From the Heun equation to the confluent Heun equation,

    P. Arnaudo and B. Withers, “Exact low-temperature Green’s functions in AdS/CFT: From the Heun equation to the confluent Heun equation,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 12, (2025) L121903,arXiv:2412.01923 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [29]

    Holographic thermal correlators from recursions,

    J. Ren and Z. Yu, “Holographic thermal correlators from recursions,”JHEP06(2025) 183, arXiv:2412.02608 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [30]

    On quivers, spectral networks and black holes,

    P. Arnaudo, A. Grassi, and Q. Hao, “On quivers, spectral networks and black holes,” arXiv:2502.01526 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [31]

    A Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization formula for quasinormal frequencies of AdS black holes,

    G. Festuccia and H. Liu, “A Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization formula for quasinormal frequencies of AdS black holes,”Adv. Sci. Lett.2(2009) 221–235,arXiv:0811.1033 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  30. [32]

    Damping of hard excitations in strongly coupledN= 4 plasma,

    J. F. Fuini, C. F. Uhlemann, and L. G. Yaffe, “Damping of hard excitations in strongly coupledN= 4 plasma,”JHEP12(2016) 042,arXiv:1610.03491 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [33]

    The return of the quartic oscillator. The complex WKB method,

    A. Voros, “The return of the quartic oscillator. The complex WKB method,”Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique39no. 3, (1983) 211–338. – 70 –

    1983

  32. [34]

    Kawai and Y

    T. Kawai and Y. Takei,Algebraic analysis of singular perturbation theory; translated by Goro Kato.Translations of mathematical monographs ; Volume 227. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1st ed., 2005

    2005

  33. [35]

    Zur theorie der riemann’schen functionen zweiter ordnung mit vier verzweigungspunkten,

    K. Heun, “Zur theorie der riemann’schen functionen zweiter ordnung mit vier verzweigungspunkten,”Mathematische Annalen33no. 2, (1888) 161–179

  34. [36]

    Ronveaux and F

    A. Ronveaux and F. Arscott,Heun ’s Differential Equations. Oxford science publications. Oxford University Press, 1995.https://books.google.ch/books?id=5p65FD8caCgC

    1995

  35. [37]

    An Analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of Kerr black holes,

    E. W. Leaver, “An Analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of Kerr black holes,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402(1985) 285–298

    1985

  36. [38]

    Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories,

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and Y. Tachikawa, “Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories,”Lett. Math. Phys.91(2010) 167–197,arXiv:0906.3219 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [39]

    Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection Formulae for Heun Functions,

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, “Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection Formulae for Heun Functions,”Commun. Math. Phys.397no. 2, (2023) 635–727,arXiv:2201.04491 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [40]

    Instantons and recursion relations in N=2 SUSY gauge theory,

    M. Matone, “Instantons and recursion relations in N=2 SUSY gauge theory,”Phys. Lett. B 357(1995) 342–348,arXiv:hep-th/9506102

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  39. [41]

    Conformal bootstrap in liouville theory,

    C. Guillarmou, A. Kupiainen, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas, “Conformal bootstrap in liouville theory,”Acta Mathematica233no. 1, (2024) 33–194

    2024

  40. [42]

    On the Convergence of Nekrasov Functions,

    P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, and A. Tanzini, “On the Convergence of Nekrasov Functions,” Annales Henri Poincare25no. 4, (2024) 2389–2425,arXiv:2212.06741 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [43]

    Perturbative connection formulas for Heun equations,

    O. Lisovyy and A. Naidiuk, “Perturbative connection formulas for Heun equations,”J. Phys. A55no. 43, (2022) 434005,arXiv:2208.01604 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [44]

    Exact wkb analysis and cluster algebras,

    K. Iwaki and T. Nakanishi, “Exact wkb analysis and cluster algebras,” 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.7094

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [45]

    Introduction to 1-summability and resurgence,

    D. Sauzin, “Introduction to 1-summability and resurgence,” 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0356

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [46]

    A primer on resurgent transseries and their asymptotics,

    I. Aniceto, G. Ba¸ sar, and R. Schiappa, “A primer on resurgent transseries and their asymptotics,”Physics Reports809(May, 2019) 1–135

    2019

  45. [47]

    An introduction to resurgence, trans-series and alien calculus,

    D. Dorigoni, “An introduction to resurgence, trans-series and alien calculus,”Annals of Physics409(Oct., 2019) 167914

    2019

  46. [48]

    Exact semiclassical expansions for one-dimensional quantum oscillators,

    ´E. Delabaere, H. Dillinger, and F. M. V. Pham, “Exact semiclassical expansions for one-dimensional quantum oscillators,”Journal of Mathematical Physics38(1997) 6126–6184

    1997

  47. [49]

    PureN= 2 super Yang-Mills and exact WKB,

    A.-K. Kashani-Poor and J. Troost, “PureN= 2 super Yang-Mills and exact WKB,”JHEP 08(2015) 160,arXiv:1504.08324 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [50]

    TBA equations and resurgent Quantum Mechanics,

    K. Ito, M. Mari˜ no, and H. Shu, “TBA equations and resurgent Quantum Mechanics,”JHEP 01(2019) 228,arXiv:1811.04812 [hep-th]. – 71 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [51]

    Exact-WKB, complete resurgent structure, and mixed anomaly in quantum mechanics on S 1,

    N. Sueishi, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, and M. ¨Unsal, “Exact-WKB, complete resurgent structure, and mixed anomaly in quantum mechanics on S 1,”JHEP07(2021) 096, arXiv:2103.06586 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  50. [52]

    Exact WKB methods in SU(2) N f = 1,

    A. Grassi, Q. Hao, and A. Neitzke, “Exact WKB methods in SU(2) N f = 1,”JHEP01 (2022) 046,arXiv:2105.03777 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [53]

    An anharmonic alliance: exact WKB meets EPT,

    B. Bucciotti, T. Reis, and M. Serone, “An anharmonic alliance: exact WKB meets EPT,” JHEP11(2023) 124,arXiv:2309.02505 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [54]

    Quasi-normal modes for the d3-branes and exact wkb analysis,

    K. Imaizumi, “Quasi-normal modes for the d3-branes and exact wkb analysis,”Physics Letters B834(Nov., 2022) 137450

    2022

  53. [55]

    Exact conditions for quasi-normal modes of extremal m5-branes and exact wkb analysis,

    K. Imaizumi, “Exact conditions for quasi-normal modes of extremal m5-branes and exact wkb analysis,”Nuclear Physics B992(July, 2023) 116221

    2023

  54. [56]

    Path to an exact WKB analysis of black hole quasinormal modes,

    T. Miyachi, R. Namba, H. Omiya, and N. Oshita, “Path to an exact WKB analysis of black hole quasinormal modes,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 12, (2025) 124045,arXiv:2503.17245 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [57]

    Instability of parametrized black hole quasinormal modes in the high-overtone limit via the exact WKB analysis,

    T. Miyachi, R. Namba, H. Omiya, and N. Oshita, “Instability of parametrized black hole quasinormal modes in the high-overtone limit via the exact WKB analysis,” arXiv:2512.18631 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [58]

    Exact WKB and Quantum Periods for Extremal Black Hole Quasinormal Modes,

    Y. Hatsuda and T. Shiga, “Exact WKB and Quantum Periods for Extremal Black Hole Quasinormal Modes,”arXiv:2605.01321 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [59]

    On the Discontinuity of Arbitrary Constants which appear in Divergent Developments,

    G. G. Stokes, “On the Discontinuity of Arbitrary Constants which appear in Divergent Developments,”Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society10(Jan., 1864) 105

  58. [60]

    Exact wkb analysis and cluster algebras ii: Simple poles, orbifold points, and generalized cluster algebras,

    K. Iwaki and T. Nakanishi, “Exact wkb analysis and cluster algebras ii: Simple poles, orbifold points, and generalized cluster algebras,”International Mathematics Research Notices2016no. 14, (Oct., 2015) 4375–4417

    2015

  59. [61]

    On the exact wkb analysis of second order linear ordinary differential equations with simple poles,

    T. Koike, “On the exact wkb analysis of second order linear ordinary differential equations with simple poles,”Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences36 no. 2, (2000) 297–319

    2000

  60. [62]

    Resurgent methods in semi-classical asymptotics,

    E. Delabaere and F. Pham, “Resurgent methods in semi-classical asymptotics,”Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e (A). Physique Theorique71no. 1, (1999) 1–94

    1999

  61. [63]

    Generating nonperturbative physics from perturbation theory,

    G. V. Dunne and M. ¨Unsal, “Generating nonperturbative physics from perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D89no. 4, (2014) 041701,arXiv:1306.4405 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [64]

    Resurgence and the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit: connecting weak and strong coupling in the Mathieu and Lam´ e systems,

    G. Ba¸ sar and G. V. Dunne, “Resurgence and the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit: connecting weak and strong coupling in the Mathieu and Lam´ e systems,”JHEP02(2015) 160, arXiv:1501.05671 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [65]

    Holomorphic Anomaly and Quantum Mechanics,

    S. Codesido and M. Marino, “Holomorphic Anomaly and Quantum Mechanics,”J. Phys. A 51no. 5, (2018) 055402,arXiv:1612.07687 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [66]

    Quantum Geometry of Resurgent Perturbative/Nonperturbative Relations,

    G. Basar, G. V. Dunne, and M. Unsal, “Quantum Geometry of Resurgent Perturbative/Nonperturbative Relations,”JHEP05(2017) 087,arXiv:1701.06572 [hep-th]. – 72 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  65. [67]

    Non-Perturbative Quantum Mechanics from Non-Perturbative Strings,

    S. Codesido, M. Marino, and R. Schiappa, “Non-Perturbative Quantum Mechanics from Non-Perturbative Strings,”Annales Henri Poincare20no. 2, (2019) 543–603, arXiv:1712.02603 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [68]

    Resurgence of deformed genus-1 curves: A novel perturbative/nonperturbative relation,

    A. C ¸ avu¸ so˘ glu, C. Koz¸ caz, and K. Tezgin, “Resurgence of deformed genus-1 curves: A novel perturbative/nonperturbative relation,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 10, (2025) 105007, arXiv:2408.02628 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [69]

    Non-perturbative asymptotics of the eigenvalues of the spheroidal equation,

    M. Meynig, “Non-perturbative asymptotics of the eigenvalues of the spheroidal equation,”J. Phys. A58no. 33, (2025) 335201,arXiv:2503.06780 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  68. [70]

    Strong cosmic censorship for charged de Sitter black holes with a charged scalar field,

    O. J. C. Dias, H. S. Reall, and J. E. Santos, “Strong cosmic censorship for charged de Sitter black holes with a charged scalar field,”Class. Quant. Grav.36no. 4, (2019) 045005, arXiv:1808.04832 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [71]

    Multi-instantons and exact results i: conjectures, wkb expansions, and instanton interactions,

    J. Zinn-Justin and U. D. Jentschura, “Multi-instantons and exact results i: conjectures, wkb expansions, and instanton interactions,”Annals of Physics313no. 1, (2004) 197–267

    2004

  70. [72]

    Uniform WKB, Multi-instantons, and Resurgent Trans-Series,

    G. V. Dunne and M. Unsal, “Uniform WKB, Multi-instantons, and Resurgent Trans-Series,” Physical Review D89no. 10, (May, 2014) 105009. arXiv:1401.5202 [cond-mat, physics:hep-th, physics:math-ph, physics:quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [73]

    Dingle,Asymptotic Expansions: Their Derivation and Interpretation

    R. Dingle,Asymptotic Expansions: Their Derivation and Interpretation. Academic Press, 1973

    1973

  72. [74]

    Exponential polynomials,

    E. T. Bell, “Exponential polynomials,”Annals of Mathematics35no. 2, (1934) 258–277

    1934

  73. [75]

    Exact instanton transseries for quantum mechanics,

    A. van Spaendonck and M. Vonk, “Exact instanton transseries for quantum mechanics,” SciPost Phys.16no. 4, (2024) 103,arXiv:2309.05700 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [76]

    Nonperturbative Ambiguities and the Reality of Resurgent Transseries,

    I. Aniceto and R. Schiappa, “Nonperturbative Ambiguities and the Reality of Resurgent Transseries,”Commun. Math. Phys.335no. 1, (2015) 183–245,arXiv:1308.1115 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  75. [77]

    Uniformization and Constructive Analytic Continuation of Taylor Series,

    O. Costin and G. V. Dunne, “Uniformization and Constructive Analytic Continuation of Taylor Series,”Commun. Math. Phys.392(2022) 863–906,arXiv:2009.01962 [math.CV]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  76. [78]

    Conformal and uniformizing maps in Borel analysis,

    O. Costin and G. V. Dunne, “Conformal and uniformizing maps in Borel analysis,”Eur. Phys. J. ST230no. 12-13, (2021) 2679–2690,arXiv:2108.01145 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  77. [79]

    Shear mode transport coefficients from multiple polylogarithms,

    P. Arnaudo, “Shear mode transport coefficients from multiple polylogarithms,”Phys. Rev. D 113(Jun, 2026) 126011

    2026

  78. [80]

    The Black hole singularity in AdS / CFT,

    L. Fidkowski, V. Hubeny, M. Kleban, and S. Shenker, “The Black hole singularity in AdS / CFT,”JHEP02(2004) 014,arXiv:hep-th/0306170

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  79. [81]

    Excursions beyond the horizon: Black hole singularities in Yang-Mills theories. I.,

    G. Festuccia and H. Liu, “Excursions beyond the horizon: Black hole singularities in Yang-Mills theories. I.,”JHEP04(2006) 044,arXiv:hep-th/0506202

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  80. [82]

    Black hole singularity from OPE,

    N. ˇCeplak, H. Liu, A. Parnachev, and S. Valach, “Black hole singularity from OPE,”JHEP 10(2024) 105,arXiv:2404.17286 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.