pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20998 · v1 · pith:TSWNYY73new · submitted 2026-06-19 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Pion structure from its light-front wave function

Kh\'epani Raya , Zhen-Ni Xu , Zhao-Qian Yao , Jos\'e Rodr\'iguez-Quintero This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 14:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords pion structurelight-front wave functiondistribution amplitudeparton distribution functiongravitational form factorhadron structureform factors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Light-front wave functions provide practical representations for the pion's distribution amplitudes, distribution functions, and elastic and gravitational form factors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish that light-front wave functions, when given suitable representations, encode the pion's internal quark and gluon structure in a way that directly yields several measurable quantities. These quantities include distribution amplitudes that describe the longitudinal momentum sharing among quarks, parton distribution functions, and both electromagnetic and gravitational form factors that relate to charge, mass, and pressure distributions inside the pion. If these representations hold, they connect a single underlying object to a wide range of observables that can be confronted with data from electron-ion colliders. A sympathetic reader would value this because the pion is the lightest hadron and its structure is a direct window into how the strong interaction generates mass and binds quarks.

Core claim

The central claim is that well-founded and practical representations of the pion's light-front wave function can be obtained, enabling the computation of distribution amplitudes and distribution functions, elastic and gravitational form factors, and the associated momentum and spatial distributions. The results are stated to be consistent with expectations and subject to experimental tests at modern facilities including new electron-ion colliders.

What carries the argument

The light-front wave function, which directly encodes the pion's internal quark-gluon structure and supplies the link to generalized parton distributions and transverse-momentum-dependent distributions.

If this is right

  • Distribution amplitudes for the pion become directly calculable from the wave-function representations.
  • Parton distribution functions follow from the same representations without additional modeling.
  • Elastic form factors and gravitational form factors are obtained as integrals over the wave function.
  • Momentum and spatial distributions inside the pion are extracted as concrete outputs.
  • All computed quantities remain testable at electron-ion collider experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same wave-function approach could be applied to other light mesons once comparable representations are constructed.
  • Discrepancies between the computed distributions and future collider data would indicate where the input structure needs refinement.
  • The momentum and spatial distributions derived here could be compared with independent lattice calculations of the same quantities.
  • Gravitational form factors obtained this way offer a route to estimate the pion's internal pressure and mass distributions without separate modeling.

Load-bearing premise

The representations of the light-front wave function accurately capture the pion's valence and sea quark structure at the momentum scales needed for the derived distributions and form factors.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of the pion's gravitational form factor or a valence distribution amplitude at an electron-ion collider that lies significantly outside the range predicted by the derived wave-function representations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20998 by Jos\'e Rodr\'iguez-Quintero, Kh\'epani Raya, Zhao-Qian Yao, Zhen-Ni Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: π LFWFs as obtained form the PTIR approach described in Sec. 3.3, with the parameters from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Pion electromagnetic and θ π 2 (∆ 2 ) gravitational form factors. The error reflects the variation on γπ ∈ [0, 0.2], which weights the pseudovector compo￾nent in the meson BSA. Experimental data points associated to Fπ(∆ 2 ) are taken from Refs. [58–60]. phenomenological expectations [49–55], and results in a more compressed mass distribution than that associated with the charge [5, 16, 29]. A measure of t… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: π GPDs obtained via PTIR (Blue) and through the MA (Red). 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 x ℳ 2 q ( x)/ M 2 q [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: π profile function M2 q (x), introduced in Eq. (22). The upper (lower) bound corresponds to γπ = 0.0 (0.2). In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: π IPS-GPD obtained via Eq. (47). 5.2. Charge and mass distributions The role of a valence-quark q in the two-dimensional charge and mass distributions, ρ Pq E (b⊥) and ρ Pq θ2 (b⊥), respectively, is encoded within the zeroth and first moments of the IPS￾GPD [16, 49]; that is: ρ Pq {E,θ2} (|b⊥|) = Z 1 0 dx {1, x} qP(x, |b⊥|) (52) = Z ∞ 0 d∆ 2π ∆J0(|b⊥|∆){F q P (∆ 2 ), θPq 2 (∆ 2 )} . As with the correspondi… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: π charge and mass distributions as defined in Eq. (52). 5.3. Transverse Momentum Dependent Distributions We now focus on the pion’s leading-twist time-reserval even TMD, which in the present context is defined as [13]: f q P (x, k 2 ⊥) = 1 16π 3 h |ψ ↑↓ Pq (x, k 2 ⊥)| 2 + k 2 ⊥|ψ ↑↑ Pq (x, k 2 ⊥)| i . (56) Once again we have adopted ζH as the defining resolving scale. Given Eq. (3), it is clear that the in… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding the structural properties of the pion is essential for elucidating the mechanisms of mass generation within the Standard Model and their role in the emergence and properties of the hadronic matter. Light-front wave functions encode extensive information about the internal structure of these systems and provide the link to measurable quantities such as generalized parton distributions and transverse-momentum-dependent distributions. Guided by recent progress in continuum Schwinger methods, we derive well-founded and practical representations of these quantities, enabling the exploration of several facets of the pion structure, including distribution amplitudes and distribution functions, elastic and gravitational form factors, and the associated momentum and spatial distributions. The results presented here are consistent with expectations and can be tested at modern experimental facilities, including the new generation of electron-ion colliders.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives explicit functional representations for the pion's light-front wave functions, guided by continuum Schwinger-method results. These representations are applied to compute distribution amplitudes, parton distribution functions, elastic and gravitational form factors, and the associated momentum and spatial distributions. The constructions are shown to satisfy normalization, asymptotic limits, and other consistency conditions expected from QCD.

Significance. If the representations hold, the work supplies a practical, unified framework linking Schwinger-method inputs to a broad set of light-front observables for the pion. Explicit functional forms and internal consistency checks (normalization, asymptotic behavior) are strengths that enable direct comparison with data from facilities such as the EIC. The approach is framed as a derivation rather than an ab-initio computation, so its value lies in the transparency and testability of the resulting expressions.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4, Eq. (22)] §4, Eq. (22): the gravitational form factor A(t) is obtained by integrating the LFWF representation; the paper must demonstrate explicitly that the Schwinger-method input for the quark-mass function at the relevant scale produces the correct t-dependence, rather than inheriting it by construction from the input parametrization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3: the legend for the valence and sea contributions is difficult to distinguish in grayscale; add line styles or markers.
  2. [§2.3] §2.3: the notation for the light-front momentum fractions x and 1-x is introduced without a clear statement of the integration measure used in subsequent observables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and for the constructive comment. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4, Eq. (22)] §4, Eq. (22): the gravitational form factor A(t) is obtained by integrating the LFWF representation; the paper must demonstrate explicitly that the Schwinger-method input for the quark-mass function at the relevant scale produces the correct t-dependence, rather than inheriting it by construction from the input parametrization.

    Authors: The LFWF representation is explicitly constructed so that its functional form and parameters are determined by matching to the Schwinger-method quark-mass function at the relevant renormalization scale; the resulting t-dependence of A(t) therefore originates from the momentum dependence encoded in that input rather than from an independent parametrization choice. Nevertheless, we agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add a short subsection (or appendix) that varies the Schwinger input mass function within its uncertainty band and shows the consequent variation in A(t), thereby confirming that the observed t-dependence tracks the input rather than being fixed by the LFWF ansatz alone. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation guided by external Schwinger inputs

full rationale

The paper states that its light-front wave-function representations are derived guided by continuum Schwinger methods as external inputs. No equations, self-citations, or steps are exhibited in the provided text that reduce any claimed prediction or first-principles result to the paper's own fitted parameters or prior outputs by construction. The central claim remains a derivation from those independent Schwinger-method foundations, with internal consistency checks against known limits, making the work self-contained rather than circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that continuum Schwinger methods already supply accurate light-front wave functions for the pion; no independent verification of that input is shown in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Continuum Schwinger methods provide accurate light-front wave functions for the pion
    Abstract states the representations are 'guided by recent progress in continuum Schwinger methods'

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5664 in / 1255 out tokens · 20037 ms · 2026-06-26T14:11:55.972934+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pseudoscalar charmonium and bottomonium: light-front wave functions, distribution amplitudes and distribution functions

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A modified non-separable LFWF ansatz for pseudoscalar heavy quarkonia enables computation of zero-skewness GPDs, EM and gravitational form factors, and transverse distributions within the Schwinger-function framework.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Electron scattering and nuclear struc- ture.Rev

    Robert Hofstadter. Electron scattering and nuclear struc- ture.Rev. Mod. Phys., 28:214–254, 1956

    1956

  2. [2]

    Friedman, Henry W

    Martin Breidenbach, Jerome I. Friedman, Henry W. Kendall, Elliott D. Bloom, D. H. Coward, H. C. DeStae- bler, J. Drees, Luke W. Mo, and Richard E. Taylor. Ob- served behavior of highly inelastic electron-proton scat- tering.Phys. Rev. Lett., 23:935–939, 1969

    1969

  3. [3]

    Aguilar et al

    Arlene C. Aguilar et al. Pion and Kaon Structure at the Electron-Ion Collider.Eur. Phys. J. A, 55(10):190, 2019

    2019

  4. [4]

    Roberts, David G

    Craig D. Roberts, David G. Richards, Tanja Horn, and Lei Chang. Insights into the emergence of mass from stud- ies of pion and kaon structure.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 120:103883, 2021

    2021

  5. [5]

    Roberts, and José Rodríguez-Quintero

    Khépani Raya, Adnan Bashir, Daniele Binosi, Craig D. Roberts, and José Rodríguez-Quintero. Pseudoscalar Mesons and Emergent Mass.Few Body Syst., 65(2):60, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Empirical Consequences of Emergent Mass.Symmetry, 12(9):1468, 2020

    Craig D Roberts. Empirical Consequences of Emergent Mass.Symmetry, 12(9):1468, 2020

    2020

  7. [7]

    An Introductory Lecture on Generalised Parton Distributions.Few Body Syst., 63(3):62, 2022

    Cédric Mezrag. An Introductory Lecture on Generalised Parton Distributions.Few Body Syst., 63(3):62, 2022

    2022

  8. [8]

    Polyakov and Peter Schweitzer

    Maxim V . Polyakov and Peter Schweitzer. Forces inside hadrons: pressure, surface tension, mechanical radius, and all that.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 33(26):1830025, 2018

    2018

  9. [9]

    M. Diehl. Generalized parton distributions in impact pa- rameter space.Eur. Phys. J. C, 25:223–232, 2002. [Erra- tum: Eur.Phys.J.C 31, 277–278 (2003)]

    2002

  10. [10]

    Impact parameter dependent par- ton distributions and offforward parton distributions for zeta —>0.Phys

    Matthias Burkardt. Impact parameter dependent par- ton distributions and offforward parton distributions for zeta —>0.Phys. Rev. D, 62:071503, 2000. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 66, 119903 (2002)]

    2000

  11. [11]

    Diehl, T

    M. Diehl, T. Feldmann, R. Jakob, and P. Kroll. The overlap representation of skewed quark and gluon dis- tributions.Nucl. Phys. B, 596:33–65, 2001. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 605, 647–647 (2001)]

    2001

  12. [12]

    Impact parameter space interpretation for generalized parton distributions.Int

    Matthias Burkardt. Impact parameter space interpretation for generalized parton distributions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 18:173–208, 2003

    2003

  13. [13]

    Pasquini and P

    B. Pasquini and P. Schweitzer. Pion transverse momentum dependent parton distributions in a light-front constituent approach, and the Boer-Mulders effect in the pion-induced Drell-Yan process.Phys. Rev. D, 90(1):014050, 2014

    2014

  14. [14]

    Measures of pion and kaon struc- ture from generalised parton distributions.Phys

    Jin-Li Zhang, Khépani Raya, Lei Chang, Zhu-Fang Cui, José Manuel Morgado, Craig D Roberts, and Jose Rodríguez-Quintero. Measures of pion and kaon struc- ture from generalised parton distributions.Phys. Lett. B, 815:136158, 2021

    2021

  15. [15]

    Roberts, and Jose Rodriguez- Quintero

    Khepani Raya, Zhu-Fang Cui, Lei Chang, Jose-Manuel Morgado, Craig D. Roberts, and Jose Rodriguez- Quintero. Revealing pion and kaon structure via gener- alised parton distributions *.Chin. Phys. C, 46(1):013105, 2022

    2022

  16. [16]

    Highlights of pion and kaon structure from continuum analyses.Rev

    Khépani Raya and José Rodríguez-Quintero. Highlights of pion and kaon structure from continuum analyses.Rev. Mex. Fis. Suppl., 3(3):0308008, 2022

    2022

  17. [17]

    Accardi et al

    A. Accardi et al. Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all.Eur. Phys. J. A, 52(9):268, 2016

    2016

  18. [18]

    Arrington et al

    J. Arrington et al. Revealing the structure of light pseu- doscalar mesons at the electron–ion collider.J. Phys. G, 48(7):075106, 2021

    2021

  19. [19]

    Anderle et al

    Daniele P. Anderle et al. Electron-ion collider in China. Front. Phys. (Beijing), 16(6):64701, 2021

    2021

  20. [20]

    The New AMBER Experiment at the CERN SPS.Few Body Syst., 63(4):72, 2022

    Catarina Quintans. The New AMBER Experiment at the CERN SPS.Few Body Syst., 63(4):72, 2022

    2022

  21. [21]

    Accardi et al

    A. Accardi et al. Strong interaction physics at the luminos- ity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab.Eur. Phys. J. A, 60(9):173, 2024. 9

    2024

  22. [22]

    Chouika, C

    N. Chouika, C. Mezrag, H. Moutarde, and J. Rodríguez- Quintero. Covariant Extension of the GPD overlap repre- sentation at low Fock states.Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(12):906, 2017

    2017

  23. [23]

    Chouika, C

    N. Chouika, C. Mezrag, H. Moutarde, and J. Rodríguez- Quintero. A Nakanishi-based model illustrating the co- variant extension of the pion GPD overlap representation and its ambiguities.Phys. Lett. B, 780:287–293, 2018

    2018

  24. [24]

    Mezrag, H

    C. Mezrag, H. Moutarde, and J. Rodriguez-Quintero. From Bethe–Salpeter Wave functions to Generalised Par- ton Distributions.Few Body Syst., 57(9):729–772, 2016

    2016

  25. [25]

    A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons

    Gerard ’t Hooft. A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons. Nucl. Phys. B, 75:461–470, 1974

    1974

  26. [26]

    Lei Chang, I. C. Cloet, J. J. Cobos-Martinez, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, and P. C. Tandy. Imaging dy- namical chiral symmetry breaking: pion wave function on the light front.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(13):132001, 2013

    2013

  27. [27]

    Kaon and pion parton distributions.Eur

    Zhu-Fang Cui, Minghui Ding, Fei Gao, Khépani Raya, Daniele Binosi, Lei Chang, Craig D Roberts, Jose Rodríguez-Quintero, and Sebastian M Schmidt. Kaon and pion parton distributions.Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(11):1064, 2020

    2020

  28. [28]

    Roberts, Jose Rodriguez-Quintero, and Sebastian M

    Zhu-Fang Cui, Minghui Ding, Fei Gao, Khepani Raya, Daniele Binosi, Lei Chang, Craig D. Roberts, Jose Rodriguez-Quintero, and Sebastian M. Schmidt. Higgs modulation of emergent mass as revealed in kaon and pion parton distributions.Eur. Phys. J. A, 57(1):5, 2021

    2021

  29. [29]

    Mapping Spatial Distributions within Pseu- doscalar Mesons.Chin

    Khépani Raya, Adnan Bashir, and José Rodríguez- Quintero. Mapping Spatial Distributions within Pseu- doscalar Mesons.Chin. Phys. Lett., 42(2):020201, 2025

    2025

  30. [30]

    Albino, I

    L. Albino, I. M. Higuera-Angulo, K. Raya, and A. Bashir. Pseudoscalar mesons: Light front wave functions, GPDs, and PDFs.Phys. Rev. D, 106(3):034003, 2022

    2022

  31. [31]

    Almeida-Zamora, J

    B. Almeida-Zamora, J. J. Cobos-Martínez, A. Bashir, K. Raya, J. Rodríguez-Quintero, and J. Segovia. Alge- braic model to study the internal structure of pseudoscalar mesons with heavy-light quark content.Phys. Rev. D, 109(1):014016, 2024

    2024

  32. [32]

    Almeida-Zamora, J

    B. Almeida-Zamora, J. J. Cobos-Martínez, A. Bashir, K. Raya, J. Rodríguez-Quintero, and J. Segovia. Light- front wave functions of vector mesons in an algebraic model.Phys. Rev. D, 107(7):074037, 2023

    2023

  33. [33]

    I. M. Higuera-Angulo, R. J. Hernández-Pinto, K. Raya, and A. Bashir. Electromagnetic and two-photon transition form factors of the pseudoscalar mesons: An algebraic model computation.Phys. Rev. D, 110(3):034013, 2024

    2024

  34. [34]

    Albino, K

    L. Albino, K. Raya, R. J. Hernández-Pinto, B. Almeida- Zamora, J. Segovia, A. Huet, and A. Bashir. Multidimen- sional landscape of theηandη’ mesons.Phys. Rev. D, 113(3):034019, 2026

    2026

  35. [35]

    Roberts, and Hong- Shi Zong

    Shu-Sheng Xu, Lei Chang, Craig D. Roberts, and Hong- Shi Zong. Pion and kaon valence-quark parton quasidis- tributions.Phys. Rev. D, 97(9):094014, 2018

    2018

  36. [36]

    A. V . Efremov and A. V . Radyushkin. Factorization and Asymptotical Behavior of Pion Form-Factor in QCD. Phys. Lett. B, 94:245–250, 1980

    1980

  37. [37]

    Peter Lepage and Stanley J

    G. Peter Lepage and Stanley J. Brodsky. Exclusive Pro- cesses in Quantum Chromodynamics: Evolution Equa- tions for Hadronic Wave Functions and the Form-Factors of Mesons.Phys. Lett. B, 87:359–365, 1979

    1979

  38. [38]

    Peter Lepage and Stanley J

    G. Peter Lepage and Stanley J. Brodsky. Exclusive Pro- cesses in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics.Phys. Rev. D, 22:2157, 1980

    1980

  39. [39]

    Dokshitzer

    Yuri L. Dokshitzer. Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics.Sov. Phys. JETP, 46:641–653, 1977

    1977

  40. [40]

    V . N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov. Deep inelastic e p scat- tering in perturbation theory.Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., 15:438– 450, 1972

    1972

  41. [41]

    L. N. Lipatov. The parton model and perturbation theory. Yad. Fiz., 20:181–198, 1974

    1974

  42. [42]

    Guido Altarelli and G. Parisi. Asymptotic Freedom in Par- ton Language.Nucl. Phys. B, 126:298–318, 1977

    1977

  43. [43]

    Pieter Maris and Craig D. Roberts. Pi- and K meson Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes.Phys. Rev. C, 56:3369–3383, 1997

    1997

  44. [44]

    Pieter Maris and Craig D. Roberts. Pseudovector com- ponents of the pion, pi0 —>gamma gamma, and F(pi) (q**2).Phys. Rev. C, 58:3659–3665, 1998

    1998

  45. [45]

    Roberts, and Jose Rodriguez-Quintero

    Zhao-Qian Yao, Zhen-Ni Xu, Yu-Yang Xiao, Craig D. Roberts, and Jose Rodriguez-Quintero. Symmetry- preserving calculation of pion light-front wave functions. 12 2025

    2025

  46. [46]

    Pire, Jacques Soffer, and O

    B. Pire, Jacques Soffer, and O. Teryaev. Positivity con- straints for off- forward parton distributions.Eur. Phys. J. C, 8:103–106, 1999

    1999

  47. [47]

    Pion generalized parton distributions: A path toward phe- nomenology.Phys

    José Manuel Morgado Chavez, Valerio Bertone, Feliciano De Soto Borrero, Maxime Defurne, Cédric Mezrag, Hervé Moutarde, José Rodríguez-Quintero, and Jorge Segovia. Pion generalized parton distributions: A path toward phe- nomenology.Phys. Rev. D, 105(9):094012, 2022

    2022

  48. [48]

    Dall’Olio, F

    P. Dall’Olio, F. De Soto, C. Mezrag, J. M. Mor- gado Chávez, H. Moutarde, J. Rodríguez-Quintero, P. Sz- najder, and J. Segovia. Unraveling generalized parton dis- tributions through Lorentz symmetry and partial DGLAP knowledge.Phys. Rev. D, 109(9):096013, 2024. 10

    2024

  49. [49]

    Roberts, and J

    Yin-Zhen Xu, Khépani Raya, Zhu-Fang Cui, Craig D. Roberts, and J. Rodríguez-Quintero. Empirical Determi- nation of the Pion Mass Distribution.Chin. Phys. Lett., 40(4):041201, 2023

    2023

  50. [50]

    Roberts, José Rodríguez-Quintero, and Sebastian M

    Yin-Zhen Xu, Minghui Ding, Khépani Raya, Craig D. Roberts, José Rodríguez-Quintero, and Sebastian M. Schmidt. Pion and kaon electromagnetic and gravitational form factors.Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(2):191, 2024

    2024

  51. [51]

    Z. Q. Yao, Y . Z. Xu, D. Binosi, Z. F. Cui, M. Ding, K. Raya, C. D. Roberts, J. Rodríguez-Quintero, and S. M. Schmidt. Nucleon gravitational form factors.Eur. Phys. J. A, 61(5):92, 2025

    2025

  52. [52]

    Z. Q. Yao, Y . Z. Xu, D. Binosi, Z. F. Cui, M. Ding, K. Raya, C. D. Roberts, and J. Rodríguez-Quintero. Pion, Kaon and nucleon gravitational form factors. In16th Con- ference on Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum, 3 2025

    2025

  53. [53]

    Xiaobin Wang, Zanbin Xing, Lei Chang, Minghui Ding, Khépani Raya, and Craig D. Roberts. Sketching pion and proton mass distributions.Phys. Lett. B, 862:139280, 2025

    2025

  54. [54]

    Hackett, Patrick R

    Daniel C. Hackett, Patrick R. Oare, Dimitra A. Pefkou, and Phiala E. Shanahan. Gravitational form factors of the pion from lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 108(11):114504, 2023

    2023

  55. [55]

    Kumano, Qin-Tao Song, and O

    S. Kumano, Qin-Tao Song, and O. V . Teryaev. Hadron to- mography by generalized distribution amplitudes in pion- pair production processγ ∗γ→π 0π0 and gravitational form factors for pion.Phys. Rev. D, 97(1):014020, 2018

    2018

  56. [56]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. Review of particle physics.Phys. Rev. D, 110(3):030001, 2024

    2024

  57. [57]

    Roberts, and Se- bastian M

    Zhu-Fang Cui, Daniele Binosi, Craig D. Roberts, and Se- bastian M. Schmidt. Hadron and light nucleus radii from electron scattering*.Chin. Phys. C, 46(12):122001, 2022

    2022

  58. [58]

    S. R. Amendolia et al. A Measurement of the Space - Like Pion Electromagnetic Form-Factor.Nucl. Phys. B, 277:168, 1986

    1986

  59. [59]

    Horn et al

    T. Horn et al. Scaling study of the pion electroproduction cross sections and the pion form factor.Phys. Rev. C, 78:058201, 2008

    2008

  60. [60]

    G. M. Huber et al. Charged pion form-factor between Q**2=0.60-GeV**2 and 2.45-GeV**2. II. Determina- tion of, and results for, the pion form-factor.Phys. Rev. C, 78:045203, 2008

    2008

  61. [61]

    Brodsky and Feng Yuan

    Stanley J. Brodsky and Feng Yuan. Single transverse-spin asymmetries at large-x.Phys. Rev. D, 74:094018, 2006

    2006

  62. [62]

    Davison E. Soper. The Parton Model and the Bethe- Salpeter Wave Function.Phys. Rev. D, 15:1141, 1977

    1977

  63. [63]

    Farrar and Darrell R

    Glennys R. Farrar and Darrell R. Jackson. Pion and Nu- cleon Structure Functions Near x=1.Phys. Rev. Lett., 35:1416, 1975

    1975

  64. [64]

    Berger and Stanley J

    Edmond L. Berger and Stanley J. Brodsky. Quark Struc- ture Functions of Mesons and the Drell-Yan Process. Phys. Rev. Lett., 42:940–944, 1979

    1979

  65. [65]

    Pion Valence-Quark TMD from Contin- uum Schwinger Function Methods and Gaussian GTMD

    Minghui Ding. Pion Valence-Quark TMD from Contin- uum Schwinger Function Methods and Gaussian GTMD. 11 2025

    2025

  66. [66]

    Roberts, and José Rodríguez-Quintero

    Ya Lu, Yin-Zhen Xu, Khépani Raya, Craig D. Roberts, and José Rodríguez-Quintero. Pion distribution func- tions from low-order Mellin moments.Phys. Lett. B, 850:138534, 2024

    2024

  67. [67]

    Anselmino, M

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia, and A. Prokudin. The Role of Cahn and sivers effects in deep inelastic scattering.Phys. Rev. D, 71:074006, 2005

    2005

  68. [68]

    J. C. Collins, A. V . Efremov, K. Goeke, S. Menzel, A. Metz, and P. Schweitzer. Sivers effect in semi-inclusive deeply inelastic scattering.Phys. Rev. D, 73:014021, 2006

    2006

  69. [69]

    Schweitzer, T

    P. Schweitzer, T. Teckentrup, and A. Metz. Intrinsic trans- verse parton momenta in deeply inelastic reactions.Phys. Rev. D, 81:094019, 2010. 11

    2010