Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 2 cited by

A Population of Little Red Dot-like Quasars in SDSS

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read SDSS quasars selected by color matching define a sample of local Little Red Dot analogs.

desk verdict The paper defines a color-matched SDSS sample of local quasars as LRD analogs and shows their SED and X-ray properties align in some ways, but the limited-band selection leaves the physical analogy unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.26098 v1 pith:6BREAUBH submitted 2026-06-24 astro-ph.GA

Quinn O. Casey , Ryan C. Hickox , Nikko J. Cleri , Jonathan H. Cohn , David M. Alexander , Emmanuel Durodola , Kelly E. Whalen , Raphael E. Hviding
show 1 more author
Tonima Tasnim Ananna
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords LittleRedDotslocalanalogsquasarsSDSSspectralenergydistributionX-raydetectionAGNBalmerabsorption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses overlap between SDSS ugriz filters at moderate redshift and JWST filters at z~5 to select about 1300 SDSS quasars whose colors match those of high-redshift Little Red Dots. A V-shaped subset of 244 objects displays higher-order Balmer absorption and [NeV] emission lines that low-resolution observations would likely miss. The composite spectral energy distribution of these Local Red Dots aligns with stacks of LRDs and is reproduced by models of a reddened AGN combined with a host galaxy, sometimes including an additional cool blackbody component. The X-ray detection fraction among LoRDs is comparable to that of ordinary quasars, though the chance of non-detection under LRD upper limits exceeds 50 percent.

What carries the argument

Photometric color selection that maps SDSS ugriz bands at moderate redshift onto JWST bands at z~5 to isolate Local Red Dots as color analogs.

What would settle it

High-resolution optical spectra of the LoRD sample that lack the reported Balmer absorption and [NeV] features, or SED fits that fail when using reddened AGN plus host models, would show the color match does not select comparable objects.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Selecting SDSS quasars whose ugriz photometry at z≈0.4 and 0.8 reproduces the JWST color cuts used for LRDs at z~5 yields a sample of ~1300 Local Red Dots. The V-shaped continuum subset exhibits prominent higher-order Balmer absorption and [NeV]λ3426 emission. The LoRD composite SED matches LRD stacks and is successfully fit either as a reddened AGN plus host galaxy or as a reddened AGN plus host galaxy plus cool blackbody; the X-ray detection rate remains similar to typical quasars.

Load-bearing premise

Objects that agree in the chosen filter colors share the same underlying physical components and spectral shapes rather than matching only by coincidence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • LoRDs supply multi-wavelength archival data that can be used to test physical processes inferred for high-redshift LRDs.
  • Dust reddening of an AGN plus host galaxy contribution is sufficient to reproduce the observed SED shapes.
  • X-ray properties of LoRDs do not require them to be intrinsically weaker than ordinary quasars.
  • Low-resolution spectra at high redshift are expected to miss higher-order Balmer absorption and certain emission lines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the analogy holds, the cool blackbody component may trace a common dust or star-formation feature across both populations.
  • The same color cuts could be applied to other low-redshift surveys to enlarge the sample of accessible analogs.
  • Detailed X-ray and radio follow-up of LoRDs would test whether the high non-detection probability under LRD limits arises from sensitivity differences.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to define a sample of ~1300 Local Red Dots (LoRDs) from SDSS quasars at z≈0.4,0.8 via ugriz color cuts chosen to overlap JWST filters used for high-z Little Red Dots (LRDs). A V-shaped subset (N=244) exhibits higher-order Balmer absorption and [NeV]λ3426 emission. The LoRD composite SED matches an LRD stack, is fit by reddened AGN+host (optionally with cool blackbody), and shows X-ray detection rates comparable to typical quasars, although the probability of non-detection under LRD upper limits exceeds 50%.

Significance. If the photometric selection identifies genuine analogs, the work supplies local laboratories for multi-wavelength study of LRD physics using archival data unavailable at high redshift. Credit is due for reliance on public SDSS quasar catalogs and standard filter-overlap calculations, which support reproducibility.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The exact ugriz color cuts, full sample statistics, and error analysis used to construct the ~1300 LoRDs are not reported. These details are load-bearing for assessing whether the selection robustly isolates objects whose rest-frame properties match LRDs rather than producing coincidental color agreement.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The central premise that limited-band color matching selects objects with comparable underlying SED shapes and physical properties is untested beyond the defining filters; no demonstration is given that the full UV-to-X-ray SEDs remain consistent once the color constraints are relaxed.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The X-ray result states detection rates comparable to typical quasars yet reports >50% probability of non-detection if subject to LRD upper limits. This tension is load-bearing for claims about whether LoRDs support or contradict the weak-X-ray interpretation of LRDs and requires explicit integration into the discussion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The criterion used to select the N=244 V-shaped continuum subset is not defined, which affects reproducibility of the Balmer-feature analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, with plans to revise the manuscript accordingly where the points identify areas for improvement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The exact ugriz color cuts, full sample statistics, and error analysis used to construct the ~1300 LoRDs are not reported. These details are load-bearing for assessing whether the selection robustly isolates objects whose rest-frame properties match LRDs rather than producing coincidental color agreement.

    Authors: We agree that these details should be more prominent. The ugriz color cuts, sample construction, and associated statistics (including uncertainties from photometric errors and selection) are fully described in Section 2 of the manuscript. To address the referee's concern, we will add a concise summary of the exact color criteria, final sample size, and error considerations directly into the abstract in the revised version. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central premise that limited-band color matching selects objects with comparable underlying SED shapes and physical properties is untested beyond the defining filters; no demonstration is given that the full UV-to-X-ray SEDs remain consistent once the color constraints are relaxed.

    Authors: The manuscript provides supporting evidence beyond the photometric selection filters, including the identification of a V-shaped subset (N=244) showing higher-order Balmer absorption and [NeV]λ3426 emission (features not used in the color cuts), as well as a composite SED that matches an LRD stack and is well-fit by reddened AGN plus host galaxy models across UV-to-NIR wavelengths. However, we acknowledge that an explicit test relaxing the color constraints and verifying consistency of the full UV-to-X-ray SEDs would further strengthen the case. We will add such a discussion or supplementary analysis in the revision. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The X-ray result states detection rates comparable to typical quasars yet reports >50% probability of non-detection if subject to LRD upper limits. This tension is load-bearing for claims about whether LoRDs support or contradict the weak-X-ray interpretation of LRDs and requires explicit integration into the discussion.

    Authors: We agree this tension requires more explicit discussion. The abstract already presents both the comparable X-ray detection rate and the >50% non-detection probability under LRD limits. We will expand the relevant discussion section to integrate this point, clarifying the implications for whether LoRDs support or challenge the weak-X-ray interpretation of high-z LRDs, including caveats from sample selection and sensitivity differences. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; sample definition and reported properties are independent measurements

full rationale

The paper selects ~1300 LoRDs by applying photometric color cuts in SDSS ugriz at z≈0.4,0.8 chosen to overlap JWST bands at z~5, then directly measures and reports observed properties of that sample (higher-order Balmer absorption, [NeV] emission in a V-shaped subset, composite SED shape, X-ray detection rate, and modeling as reddened AGN+host). These quantities are extracted from the selected objects rather than being predictions or parameters fitted from the same color criteria by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps. The central claims rest on external data (SDSS catalogs, X-ray detections) and standard filter-overlap calculations, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the filter overlap produces physically meaningful analogs and on standard assumptions about quasar SED shapes and reddening.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption SDSS ugriz filters at z≈0.4, 0.8 overlap well with the JWST filters used to select LRDs at z∼5
    This overlap is invoked to justify defining the LoRD sample via photometric colors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Population of Little Red Dot-like Quasars in SDSS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6BREAUBH

@misc{pith2026260626098,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Population of Little Red Dot-like Quasars in SDSS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6BREAUBH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.26098}
}
abstract

Compact and red sources in the high redshift ($z\sim5$) Universe, known as "Little Red Dots" (LRDs), are among JWST's most intriguing discoveries. These sources have broad Balmer emission lines, weak X-ray emission, and unique spectral energy distributions (SEDs) poorly fit by either stellar or AGN templates. Local analogs of LRDs allow for detailed studies of the underlying physical processes with archival multi-wavelength datasets unavailable in the high-$z$ Universe. We show that the SDSS $ugriz$ filters at $z\approx0.4, 0.8$ overlap well with the JWST filters used to select LRDs at $z\sim5$. We use SDSS quasars to define a sample of $\sim1300$ Local Red Dots (LoRDs) which share the same photometric colors of LRDs. A subset of the LoRD sample selected to have V-shaped continua ($N=244$) show prominent higher-order Balmer absorption features and [NeV]$\lambda$3426 emission, both of which would likely be missed in JWST/PRISM observations given the low spectral resolution. A composite SED of the LoRDs differs from a typical quasar SED in the rest-frame UV/optical, but the two agree with each other in the NIR. The LoRD SED matches well with a stack of LRDs and can be modeled either as a reddened AGN combined with a host galaxy, or as a reddened AGN combined with a host galaxy and a cool blackbody. Interestingly, the LoRDs are X-ray detected at a rate comparable to typical quasars. However, the probability that LoRDs and typical quasars would go undetected, if subject to the LRD X-ray upper limits, is $>50\%$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26098 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: The throughput curves for the JWST filters at z = 5.0 (shaded curves) compared to the SDSS filters (dotted lines) at z = 0.78 (red1, top panel) and z = 0.38 (red2, bottom panel). The significant overlap between the filter sets allows us to select LoRDs using the SDSS filters. Center: r − iz versus r − z in AB magnitudes for the control sample (gray) and the LoRDs (red); the red1 sample is the top panel and red… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of LoRDs and control QSOs in red￾shift-bolometric luminosity space. LoRDs are selected based on Equations 2 and 3, and control QSOs are selected to match LoRDs in redshift-bolometric luminosity space allow￾ing for double counting. within a normal sized (e.g., Milky Way like) host galaxy at low-z is an open question. Of the 1325 LoRDs, 59% are classified as stars (i.e., point source like) by the SDSS ima… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Median stacked spectra for the red1/red2 LoRDs as well as the control sample. The spectra are normalized to the integrated flux between 3645 ± 100˚A and scaled by a factor of 1000. The red spectra are selected to have V-shaped continua (top N = 111, bottom N = 133) and the pink spectra do not (top N = 238, bottom N = 148). Prominent emission/absorption features and the Balmer limit (H∞) are labeled. The stacked spec… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a): Broad Hα luminosity versus rest-frame 2 − 10 keV luminosity. Teal squares are LRD upper limits from Yue et al. (2024) and red points are our sample of LoRDs, where diamonds with downward facing arrows indicate upper limits. The black dashed line is the LX − LHα re…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a): JWST/PRISM spectrum for the LRD UNCOVER-4286 (teal) compared to a stacked SDSS spectrum of the red2 V-LoRDS (red) and the red2 control sample (gray). The stacked SDSS spectra are convolved with the PRISM resolution and matched to the same wavelength grid as UNCOVE…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A subsample of the LoRDs which have signatures of absorption features in their Balmer lines (Hα and Hβ). The left panel shows the full SDSS spectrum smoothed using SciPy’s medfilt function with a kernel size of seven. The right panels zoom in on the Hα (bottom) and Hβ …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Unsupervised selection and characterisation of Little Red Dots in JWST surveys with manifold learning

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An unsupervised UMAP embedding of JWST photometry isolates Little Red Dots in two compact redshift-split regions, reaching ~0.78 purity at ~0.82 completeness and yielding ~100 new candidates.

  2. NEXUS: Spectral Variability of Little Red Dots and Blue Active Galactic Nuclei at $2 \lesssim z \lesssim 6$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Little Red Dots at z=2-6 show less than 4% intrinsic H-alpha variability on 1-3 month rest-frame timescales, a flat white-noise pattern unlike normal AGNs, implying different broad-line production.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 142 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and Survey Design

    Aihara, H., Arimoto, N., Armstrong, R., et al.\ 2018, , 70, S4. doi:10.1093/pasj/psx066

    work page Pith review doi:10.1093/pasj/psx066 2018

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Allen, N., et al.\ 2023, , 956, 1, 61. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acef21

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acef21 2023

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al.\ 2025, , 991, 1, 37. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd \'a n, \'A ., Kov \'a cs, O. E., et al.\ 2024, , 969, 1, L18. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  5. [5]

    doi:10.1093/pasj/62.5.1333

    Aoki, K.\ 2010, , 62, 1333. doi:10.1093/pasj/62.5.1333

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/62.5.1333 2010

  6. [6]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Assef, R. J., Kochanek, C. S., Brodwin, M., et al.\ 2010, , 713, 2, 970. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/970

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/713/2/970 2010

  7. [7]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al.\ 2022, , 935, 167. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  8. [8]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., et al.\ 2024, , 977, 1, L13. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8 2024

Show all 146 references
  1. [9]

    A., et al.\ 2018, , 854, 1, 42

    Balokovi \'c , M., Brightman, M., Harrison, F. A., et al.\ 2018, , 854, 1, 42. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa7eb

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    S., Comerford, J

    Barrows, R. S., Comerford, J. M., Stern, D., et al.\ 2023, , 951, 2, 92. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd2d3

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Barger, A. J. & Cowie, L. L.\ 2026, arXiv:2605.27903

    2026 arXiv

  4. [12]

    G., Kocevski, D

    Barro, G., P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez, P. G., Kocevski, D. D., et al.\ 2024, , 963, 2, 128. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    C., Rossi, E

    Begelman, M. C., Rossi, E. M., & Armitage, P. J.\ 2008, , 387, 4, 1649. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x

    2008 doi

  6. [14]

    E., et al.\ 2024, , 974, 1, 92

    Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., Whitaker, K. E., et al.\ 2024, , 974, 1, 92. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.11677

    Billand, J.-B., Elbaz, D., Franco, M., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2604.11677. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.11677

    2026 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    R., Bershady, M

    Blanton, M. R., Bershady, M. A., Abolfathi, B., et al.\ 2017, , 154, 1, 28. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    C., et al.\ 2000, , 533, 2, 682

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al.\ 2000, , 533, 2, 682. doi:10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  10. [18]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Kokorev, V., et al.\ 2024, , 975, 1, L4. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7ba7

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    J., Yang, G., Papovich, C., et al.\ 2023, , 948, 112

    Cleri, N. J., Yang, G., Papovich, C., et al.\ 2023, , 948, 112. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc1e6

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Olivier, G

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Hutchison, T. A., et al.\ 2023, , 953, 10. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acde55

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    J., Olivier, G

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Backhaus, B. E., et al.\ 2025, , 994, 146. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0f17

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    J., Lewis, Z

    Cleri, N. J., Lewis, Z. J., Leja, J., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2605.30410

    2026 arXiv

  15. [23]

    P., Whitaker, K

    Cloonan, A. P., Whitaker, K. E., Manning, S. M., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2603.24700. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.24700

    2026 doi

  16. [24]

    D., Tremonti, C

    Davis, J. D., Tremonti, C. A., Swiggum, C. N., et al.\ 2023, , 951, 2, 105. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accbbf

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    C., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2606.00258

    Davis, K., Brooks, M., Simons, R. C., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2606.00258. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.00258

    2026 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557164

    Delvecchio, I., Daddi, E., Magnelli, B., et al.\ 2025, , 704, A313. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557164

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    G., et al.\ 2026, , 171, 5, 285

    DESI Collaboration, Abdul Karim, M., Adame, A. G., et al.\ 2026, , 171, 5, 285. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae4c43

    2026 doi

  20. [28]

    C.\ 2025, , 985, 2, 169

    Durodola, E., Pacucci, F., & Hickox, R. C.\ 2025, , 985, 2, 169. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adced2

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    J., Weinberg, D

    Eisenstein, D. J., Weinberg, D. H., Agol, E., et al.\ 2011, , 142, 3, 72. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/3/72

    2011 doi

  22. [30]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al.\ 2026, , 283, 1, 6

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al.\ 2026, , 283, 1, 6. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163

    2026 doi

  23. [31]

    N., Evans, J

    Evans, I. N., Evans, J. D., Mart \' nez-Galarza, J. R., et al.\ 2024, , 274, 2, 22. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad6319

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    L.\ 1999, , 111, 755, 63

    Fitzpatrick, E. L.\ 1999, , 111, 755, 63. doi:10.1086/316293

    1999 doi

  25. [33]

    W., Lang, D., et al.\ 2013, , 125, 925, 306

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., et al.\ 2013, , 125, 925, 306. doi:10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  26. [34]

    H., Broussard, A., et al.\ 2018, , 863, 2, 131

    Forrest, B., Tran, K.-V. H., Broussard, A., et al.\ 2018, , 863, 2, 131. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad232

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    J., Labb \'e , I., Zitrin, A., et al.\ 2024, , 628, 8006, 57

    Furtak, L. J., Labb \'e , I., Zitrin, A., et al.\ 2024, , 628, 8006, 57. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452186

    de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al.\ 2025, , 697, A189. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452186

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    P., et al.\ 2025, , 701, A168

    de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al.\ 2025, , 701, A168. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554681

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    E., Naidu, R

    de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al.\ 2025, arXiv:2511.21820. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.21820

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    J., Chatzikos, M., Guzm \'a n, F., et al.\ 2017, , 53, 385

    Ferland, G. J., Chatzikos, M., Guzm \'a n, F., et al.\ 2017, , 53, 385. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1705.10877

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.02096

    Fu, S., Zhang, Z., Jiang, D., et al.\ 2025, arXiv:2512.02096. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.02096

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    doi:10.1038/s41550-026-02885-8

    Fu, S., Zhang, Z., Jiang, D., et al.\ 2026, Nature Astronomy. doi:10.1038/s41550-026-02885-8

    2026 doi

  34. [42]

    J., et al.\ 2020, , 637, A94

    Gao, F., Wang, L., Pearson, W. J., et al.\ 2020, , 637, A94. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937178

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014039

    Gilli, R., Vignali, C., Mignoli, M., et al.\ 2010, , The X-ray to [Ne V]3426 flux ratio: discovering heavily obscured AGN in the distant Universe, 519, A92. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014039

    2010 doi

  36. [44]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/218

    Glikman, E., Simmons, B., Mailly, M., et al.\ 2015, , 806, 2, 218. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/218

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    D., Greene, J

    Goulding, A. D., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al.\ 2018, , 70, S37. doi:10.1093/pasj/psx135

    2018 doi

  38. [46]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al.\ 2024, , 964, 1, 39. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    E., Setton, D

    Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., Furtak, L. J., et al.\ 2026, , 996, 2, 129. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1836

    2026 doi

  40. [48]

    A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D

    Guia, C. A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D. D.\ 2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 8, 207. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad7262

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    ascl:1809.008

    Guo, H., Shen, Y., & Wang, S.\ 2018, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:1809.008

    2018

  42. [50]

    B.\ 2007, , 133, 4, 1271

    Hall, P. B.\ 2007, , 133, 4, 1271. doi:10.1086/511272

    2007 doi

  43. [51]

    et al.\ 2020, , 585, 357

    Harris, C.R., Millman, K.J., van der Walt, S.J. et al.\ 2020, , 585, 357. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    C., Myers, A

    Hickox, R. C., Myers, A. D., Greene, J. E., et al.\ 2017, , 849, 1, 53. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8c77

    2017 doi

  45. [53]

    Hickox, R. C. & Alexander, D. M.\ 2018, , 56, 625. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051803

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    D.\ 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 3, 90

    Hunter, J. D.\ 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 3, 90. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  47. [55]

    E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al.\ 2025, , 702, A57. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555816

    2025 doi

  48. [56]

    E., de Graaff, A., Liu, H., et al.\ 2026, , 1000, 1, L18

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Liu, H., et al.\ 2026, , 1000, 1, L18. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4c88

    2026 doi

  49. [57]

    & Maiolino, R.\ 2025, , 980, 2, L27

    Inayoshi, K. & Maiolino, R.\ 2025, , 980, 2, L27. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    2025 doi

  50. [58]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adea66

    Inayoshi, K.\ 2025, , 988, 1, L22. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adea66

    2025 doi

  51. [59]

    Inayoshi, K. & Ho, L. C.\ 2025, arXiv:2512.03130. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.03130

    2025 doi

  52. [60]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2501.13082

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., \"U bler, H., et al.\ 2025a, , arXiv:2501.13082. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2501.13082

    doi

  53. [61]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., \"U bler, H., et al.\ 2025, , 544, 4, 3900. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    2025 doi

  54. [62]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.23774

    Ji, X., D'Eugenio, F., Juod z balis, I., et al.\ 2025b, , arXiv:2507.23774. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.23774

    doi

  55. [63]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2235

    Ji, X., D'Eugenio, F., Juod z balis, I., et al.\ 2026, , 545, 3, staf2235. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2235

    2026 doi

  56. [64]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.03370

    Ji, X., Pezzulli, G., D'Eugenio, F., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2604.03370. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.03370

    2026 doi arXiv

  57. [65]

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20847.x

    Jin, C., Ward, M., & Done, C.\ 2012, , 422, 4, 3268. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20847.x

    2012 doi

  58. [66]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/88

    Juneau, S., Bournaud, F., Charlot, S., et al.\ 2014, , 788, 1, 88. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/88

    2014 doi

  59. [67]

    J., Maier, C., Yabe, K., et al.\ 2013, , 774, 1, L10

    Kewley, L. J., Maier, C., Yabe, K., et al.\ 2013, , 774, 1, L10. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/774/1/L10

    2013 doi

  60. [68]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al.\ 2025, , 986, 2, 126. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    2025 doi

  61. [69]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al.\ 2024, , 968, 1, 38. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    2024 doi

  62. [70]

    P., et al.\ 2025, arXiv:2511.07515

    Kokorev, V., Chisholm, J., Naidu, R. P., et al.\ 2025, arXiv:2511.07515. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.07515

    2025 doi

  63. [71]

    P., et al.\ 2026, , 1004, 2, 153

    Kokorev, V., Chisholm, J., Naidu, R. P., et al.\ 2026, , 1004, 2, 153. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4ed7

    2026 doi

  64. [72]

    & Harikane, Y.\ 2024, , arXiv:2407.04777

    Kokubo, M. & Harikane, Y.\ 2024, , arXiv:2407.04777. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.04777

    2024 doi

  65. [73]

    & Harikane, Y.\ 2025, , 995, 1, 24

    Kokubo, M. & Harikane, Y.\ 2025, , 995, 1, 24. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e

    2025 doi

  66. [74]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8ec9

    Koss, M., Trakhtenbrot, B., Ricci, C., et al.\ 2017, , 850, 1, 74. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8ec9

    2017 doi

  67. [75]

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    Labb \'e , I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al.\ 2023, , 616, 7956, 266. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    2023 doi

  68. [76]

    E., Matthee, J., et al.\ 2024, arXiv:2412.04557

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Matthee, J., et al.\ 2024, arXiv:2412.04557. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.04557

    2024 doi

  69. [77]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al.\ 2025, , 978, 1, 92

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al.\ 2025, , 978, 1, 92. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551

    2025 doi

  70. [78]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.13047

    Lambrides, E., Garofali, K., Larson, R., et al.\ 2024, , arXiv:2409.13047. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.13047

    2024 doi arXiv

  71. [79]

    L., Garofali, K., et al.\ 2026, Nature Astronomy

    Lambrides, E., Larson, R. L., Garofali, K., et al.\ 2026, Nature Astronomy. doi:10.1038/s41550-026-02813-w

    2026 doi

  72. [80]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.09607

    Lambrides, E., Larson, R., Hutchison, T., et al.\ 2025, arXiv:2509.09607. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.09607

    2025 doi

  73. [81]

    & Hjorth, J.\ 2023, , 957, 2, L27

    Langeroodi, D. & Hjorth, J.\ 2023, , 957, 2, L27. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acfeec

    2023 doi

  74. [82]

    J., Almaini, O., et al.\ 2007, , 379, 4, 1599

    Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al.\ 2007, , 379, 4, 1599. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x

    2007 doi

  75. [83]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.10659

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al.\ 2025, , arXiv:2507.10659. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.10659

    2025 doi

  76. [84]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al.\ 2026, , 997, 2, 364. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

    2026 doi

  77. [85]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.21574

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2605.21574. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.21574

    2026 doi arXiv

  78. [86]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.07190

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y.-F., Quataert, E., et al.\ 2025, , arXiv:2507.07190. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.07190

    2025 doi

  79. [87]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y.-F., Quataert, E., et al.\ 2025, , 994, 1, 113. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19

    2025 doi

  80. [88]

    E., Ivezi \'c , Z., et al.\ 2001, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X, 238, 269

    Lupton, R., Gunn, J. E., Ivezi \'c , Z., et al.\ 2001, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X, 238, 269. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0101420

    2001 doi arXiv

  81. [89]

    E., Setton, D

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al.\ 2025, , 981, 2, 191. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada613

    2025 doi

  82. [90]

    E., Volonteri, M., et al.\ 2025, arXiv:2509.02662

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Volonteri, M., et al.\ 2025, arXiv:2509.02662. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.02662

    2025 doi

  83. [91]

    E., Setton, D

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al.\ 2026, , 1000, 1, 59. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4596

    2026 doi

  84. [92]

    & Maiolino, R.\ 2026, arXiv:2602.22386

    Madau, P. & Maiolino, R.\ 2026, arXiv:2602.22386

    2026

  85. [93]

    & Maiolino, R.\ 2026, arXiv:2602.22386

    Madau, P. & Maiolino, R.\ 2026, arXiv:2602.22386. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.22386

    2026 doi

  86. [94]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf359

    Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al.\ 2025, , 538, 3, 1921. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf359

    2025 doi

  87. [95]

    C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al.\ 2005, , 619, 1, L1

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al.\ 2005, , 619, 1, L1. doi:10.1086/426387

    2005 doi

  88. [96]

    P., Brammer, G., et al.\ 2024, , 963, 2, 129

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al.\ 2024, , 963, 2, 129. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    2024 doi

  89. [97]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    Matthee, J., Torralba, A., Pezzulli, G., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2603.17667. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    2026 doi

  90. [98]

    Mukai, K.\ 1993, Legacy, 3, 21

    1993

  91. [99]

    D., Palanque-Delabrouille, N., Prakash, A., et al.\ 2015, , 221, 2, 27

    Myers, A. D., Palanque-Delabrouille, N., Prakash, A., et al.\ 2015, , 221, 2, 27. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/221/2/27

    2015 doi

  92. [100]

    P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al.\ 2025, , arXiv:2503.16596

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al.\ 2025, , arXiv:2503.16596. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    2025 doi arXiv

  93. [101]

    & Ouchi, M.\ 2014, , 442, 1, 900

    Nakajima, K. & Ouchi, M.\ 2014, , 442, 1, 900. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu902

    2014 doi

  94. [102]

    & Pounds, K

    Nandra, K. & Pounds, K. A.\ 1994, , 268, 405. doi:10.1093/mnras/268.2.405

    1994 doi

  95. [103]

    M., Muller Sanchez, F., et al.\ 2023, arXiv:2301.13322

    Negus, J., Comerford, J. M., Muller Sanchez, F., et al.\ 2023, arXiv:2301.13322. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2301.13322

    2023 doi

  96. [104]

    M., S \'a nchez, F

    Negus, J., Comerford, J. M., S \'a nchez, F. M., et al.\ 2023, , 945, 2, 127. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb772

    2023 doi

  97. [105]

    & Narayan, R.\ 2024, , 976, 1, 96

    Pacucci, F. & Narayan, R.\ 2024, , 976, 1, 96. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7

    2024 doi

  98. [106]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20064894

    Panessa, F., Bassani, L., Cappi, M., et al.\ 2006, , 455, 1, 173. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20064894

    2006 doi

  99. [107]

    G., Barro, G., Rieke, G

    P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al.\ 2024, , 968, 1, 4. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb

    2024 doi

  100. [108]

    G., Barro, G., Carniani, S., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2602.20247

    P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez, P. G., Barro, G., Carniani, S., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2602.20247. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.20247

    2026 doi

  101. [109]

    P., Bogdan, A., Marshall, H

    Plucinsky, P. P., Bogdan, A., Marshall, H. L., et al.\ 2018, , 10699, 106996B. doi:10.1117/12.2312748

    2018 doi

  102. [110]

    Reback, J., Jbrockmendel, McKinney, W., et al.\ 2021, Zenodo

    2021

  103. [111]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809889

    Revnivtsev, M., Churazov, E., Sazonov, S., et al.\ 2008, , 490, 1, 37. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809889

    2008 doi

  104. [112]

    T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L

    Richards, G. T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., et al.\ 2006, , 166, 2, 470. doi:10.1086/506525

    2006 doi

  105. [113]

    H., Wright, G

    Rieke, G. H., Wright, G. S., B \"o ker, T., et al.\ 2015, , 127, 953, 584. doi:10.1086/682252

    2015 doi

  106. [114]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/L6

    Risaliti, G., Young, M., & Elvis, M.\ 2009, , 700, 1, L6. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/L6

    2009 doi

  107. [115]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.20177

    Ronayne, K., Papovich, C., Kirkpatrick, A., et al.\ 2025, arXiv:2508.20177. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.20177

    2025 doi

  108. [116]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e6b

    Ronayne, K., Papovich, C., Kirkpatrick, A., et al.\ 2026, , 1003, 2, 234. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e6b

    2026 doi

  109. [117]

    P., Myers, A

    Ross, N. P., Myers, A. D., Sheldon, E. S., et al.\ 2012, , 199, 1, 3. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/199/1/3

    2012 doi

  110. [118]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc256

    Sacchi, A., Paggeot, K., Dillmann, S., et al.\ 2025, , 983, 2, 124. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc256

    2025 doi

  111. [119]

    L., McAlpine, W., et al.\ 2014, , 441, 2, 1297

    Satyapal, S., Ellison, S. L., McAlpine, W., et al.\ 2014, , 441, 2, 1297. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu650

    2014 doi

  112. [120]

    D., K \"o nig, O., Descalzo, M., et al.\ 2022, Astronomy and Computing, 38, 100531

    Saxton, R. D., K \"o nig, O., Descalzo, M., et al.\ 2022, Astronomy and Computing, 38, 100531. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2021.100531

    2022 doi

  113. [121]

    H., Tremonti, C

    Sell, P. H., Tremonti, C. A., Hickox, R. C., et al.\ 2014, , 441, 4, 3417. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu636

    2014 doi

  114. [122]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., de Graaff, A., et al.\ 2025, , 995, 1, 118. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1500

    2025 doi

  115. [123]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., Spilker, J. S., et al.\ 2025, , 991, 1, L10. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b

    2025 doi

  116. [124]

    N., Richards, G

    Shen, Y., Brandt, W. N., Richards, G. T., et al.\ 2016, , 831, 1, 7. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/7

    2016 doi

  117. [125]

    B., Horne, K., et al.\ 2019, , 241, 2, 34

    Shen, Y., Hall, P. B., Horne, K., et al.\ 2019, , 241, 2, 34. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab074f

    2019 doi

  118. [126]

    A., Gunn, J

    Smee, S. A., Gunn, J. E., Uomoto, A., et al.\ 2013, , 146, 2, 32. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/32

    2013 doi

  119. [127]

    Q., Naidu, R

    Sun, W. Q., Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2601.20929. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.20929

    2026 doi arXiv

  120. [128]

    Q., Naidu, R

    Sun, W. Q., Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., et al.\ 2026, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 9, 62505. doi:10.33232/001c.162505

    2026 doi

  121. [129]

    R., et al.\ 2001, , 122, 4, 1861

    Strateva, I., Ivezi \'c , Z ., Knapp, G. R., et al.\ 2001, , 122, 4, 1861. doi:10.1086/323301

    2001 doi

  122. [130]

    P., Plat, A., et al.\ 2025, , 991, 2, 217

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Plat, A., et al.\ 2025, , 991, 2, 217. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfd57

    2025 doi

  123. [131]

    B.\ 2005, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, 347, 29

    Taylor, M. B.\ 2005, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, 347, 29

    2005

  124. [132]

    doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65070-x

    Tripodi, R., Martis, N., Markov, V., et al.\ 2025, Nature Communications, 16, 1, 9830. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65070-x

    2025 doi

  125. [133]

    G., Bezanson, R., van der Wel, A., et al.\ 2014, , 791, 1, 45

    van Dokkum, P. G., Bezanson, R., van der Wel, A., et al.\ 2014, , 791, 1, 45. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/45

    2014 doi

  126. [134]

    E., et al.\ 2020, Nature Medicine, 17, 261

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al.\ 2020, Nature Medicine, 17, 261. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  127. [135]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

    Wang, B., Leja, J., de Graaff, A., et al.\ 2024, , 969, 1, L13. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

    2024 doi

  128. [136]

    L., et al.\ 2025, , 984, 2, 121

    Wang, B., de Graaff, A., Davies, R. L., et al.\ 2025, , 984, 2, 121. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc1ca

    2025 doi

  129. [137]

    A., Coriat, M., Traulsen, I., et al.\ 2020, , 641, A136

    Webb, N. A., Coriat, M., Traulsen, I., et al.\ 2020, , 641, A136. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937353

    2020 doi

  130. [138]

    E., McIntosh, D

    Weston, M. E., McIntosh, D. H., Brodwin, M., et al.\ 2017, , 464, 4, 3882. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2620

    2017 doi

  131. [139]

    E., Hickox, R

    Whalen, K. E., Hickox, R. C., Coil, A. L., et al.\ 2022, , 164, 5, 222. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac958f

    2022 doi

  132. [140]

    E., Weaver, K

    Whalen, K. E., Weaver, K. A., Hickox, R. C., et al.\ 2026, , 998, 1, 133. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae31e5

    2026 doi

  133. [141]

    C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al.\ 2024, , 968, 1, 34

    Williams, C. C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al.\ 2024, , 968, 1, 34. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3f17

    2024 doi

  134. [142]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al.\ 2010, , 140, 6, 1868. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  135. [143]

    & Shen, Y.\ 2022, , 263, 2, 42

    Wu, Q. & Shen, Y.\ 2022, , 263, 2, 42. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9ead

    2022 doi

  136. [144]

    G., Adelman, J., Anderson, J

    York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, J. E., et al.\ 2000, , 120, 3, 1579. doi:10.1086/301513

    2000 doi

  137. [145]

    J., & Richard, J.\ 2013, , 763, 1, 9

    Yuan, T.-T., Kewley, L. J., & Richard, J.\ 2013, , 763, 1, 9. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/9

    2013 doi

  138. [146]

    T., et al.\ 2024, , 974, 2, L26

    Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., Ananna, T. T., et al.\ 2024, , 974, 2, L26. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.