Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Heavy-ion collisions can pin neutron-star pressures as well as gravitational waves do.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 09:39 UTC pith:YPYH4UBQ

load-bearing objection A candid, useful review whose headline comparability claim outruns the transport-model uncertainty budget it itself documents. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2606.29588 v2 pith:YPYH4UBQ submitted 2026-06-28 nucl-th astro-ph.HEnucl-ex

Nuclear equation-of-state at high density and multi-messenger astronomy: contribution of heavy-ion collisions

A. Le F\`evre This is my paper
classification nucl-th astro-ph.HEnucl-ex
keywords nuclear equation of stateheavy-ion collisionssymmetry energycollective flowkaon productionpion ratiosneutron starsmulti-messenger astronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review argues that laboratory measurements of heavy-ion collisions have reached the point where they can independently constrain the equation of state of neutron-star matter. It combines constraints on the symmetric-nuclear-matter part of the equation of state (from collective flow and sub-threshold kaon yields) with constraints on the symmetry energy (from neutron-to-charged-particle flow ratios and pion ratios) to predict the pressure-density relation inside a neutron star up to roughly 2.5 times saturation density. The predicted pressures agree with constraints from gravitational waves and pulsar observations, and the laboratory accuracy is comparable to those astronomical measurements up to about 1.5 times saturation density. If this holds, terrestrial collisions and merging neutron stars are probing the same dense-matter equation of state, and heavy-ion data can anchor neutron-star models in a density region where astronomical data are still scarce. The review also makes clear that the whole chain rests on the reliability of transport-model simulations, whose systematic uncertainties are not yet fully quantified.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the pressure in neutron-star matter, as a function of density, can be predicted from heavy-ion collision data alone: the isoscalar incompressibility around 190 MeV and the symmetry-energy slope around L = 72 MeV (or 63 MeV) from flow and particle-production analyses combine into a pressure band that agrees with gravitational-wave and X-ray-derived constraints. In the density range from roughly 1 to 1.5 times saturation density, the heavy-ion-derived uncertainty is comparable to or better than the astronomical one. A combined Bayesian analysis including both data types yields a 1.4-solar-mass neutron-star radius of about 12.0 km with an uncertainty around 0.4

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the set of flow and particle-production observables from intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions, interpreted through semi-classical transport simulations. Elliptic flow (out-of-plane squeeze-out) is the main probe of the isoscalar incompressibility; sub-threshold kaon yields provide an independent check of softness; and the ratio of neutron elliptic flow to charged-particle elliptic flow is the main probe of the density dependence of the symmetry energy. A key methodological step is attaching a probed-density profile to each observable, so that a constraint is not extrapolated outside the density region where the observable is actually sensitive. Transport mod

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the computer simulations used to interpret heavy-ion collisions convert the cold nuclear equation of state into measured flow and particle yields faithfully enough that matching data to simulation reads off the true equation of state.

What would settle it

Run the same measured flow, kaon, and pion spectra through two independent, benchmarked transport models that both reproduce the data within their quoted uncertainties, and compare the extracted pressure at 1.5 times saturation density; if the two models disagree by more than the paper's quoted error bars, the claimed accuracy from heavy-ion collisions is not yet real.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Heavy-ion data can serve as a laboratory anchor for neutron-star modelling in the density region around 1–1.5 times saturation density, where gravitational-wave and pulsar constraints are comparatively loose.
  • A combined analysis that includes heavy-ion constraints alongside astronomical observations predicts a neutron-star radius near 12 km for a 1.4-solar-mass star, consistent with current X-ray and gravitational-wave inferences.
  • Pushing the measured symmetry-energy constraint beyond 1.5 times saturation density is the direct path to improving high-density pressure predictions for neutron stars.
  • If the softness implied by kaon and flow data is correct, the nuclear equation of state stiffens only mildly above saturation density, with direct consequences for neutron-star maximum mass and tidal deformability.
  • Reducing transport-model systematics through benchmarking and common standards is a precondition for turning the current qualitative agreement into a quantitative constraint.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct measurement of the dominant systematic error would be to run the same flow, kaon, and pion data through two or more independent, benchmarked transport models and compare the extracted pressures; the review's own numbers suggest the model spread is at least as large as the quoted statistical uncertainties.
  • One could close the loop without invoking any radius measurement by using the heavy-ion-derived pressure band to predict the tidal deformability of a 1.4-solar-mass neutron star and comparing it with the gravitational-wave inspiral inference.
  • The probed-density methodology emphasized in the review could be applied to strangeness-sensitive observables such as hyperon and kaon ratios, giving heavy-ion experiments a targeted way to identify the density range where a possible quark-matter or hyperon phase transition would appear in neutron-star cores.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review surveys heavy-ion collision (HIC) constraints on the symmetric and asymmetric nuclear equation of state at supra-saturation densities and compares them with neutron-star observations. It argues that combining flow, kaon, and pion constraints yields a pressure-density relation for neutron-star matter consistent with GW170817 and NICER data, with comparable accuracy up to about 1.5 n_sat, and quotes a combined radius of 12.01 +0.37/−0.38 km for a 1.4 solar-mass star from Huth et al. The paper also discusses density-sensitivity profiles, future experiments (ASY-EOS II, CBM, BM@N, FRIB400), transport-model uncertainties, strangeness, and QCD phase transitions.

Significance. If the central comparison holds, the review provides a valuable bridge between laboratory nuclear physics and multi-messenger astronomy. Its strengths are the emphasis on density-sensitivity profiles (§3.3), the insistence on momentum-dependent interactions (§3.2), the explicit acknowledgment that ASY-EOS II analysis is ongoing (§6.2), the questioning of AGS/Bevalac data (§6.1), and the repeated flagging of transport-model dependence (§6.3). However, the headline 'comparable accuracy' claim is presented with single-model uncertainties; the inter-model spread documented in the review itself is not propagated, so the central comparison is not yet as secure as the abstract suggests. The review is nevertheless useful as a candid status report of the field.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §5.1; §6.3] The headline claim that HIC accuracy is comparable to astronomical constraints up to 1.5 n_sat is supported only by single-model error bars. K0=190±30 MeV (IQMD, §3.2), γ=0.72±0.19 (UrQMD, §4.1) and L=63–72 MeV are fed into Fig. 10(c) and the 12.01 km radius, but §3.2 also reports K0=220±40 MeV (UrQMD) and 190+9/−11 MeV (dcQMD), and SMASH sees stiffening at ≈3 n_sat. These are transport-model systematics, not statistical scatter. Since §6.3 concedes the field 'cannot be conclusive without a reliable uncertainty determination,' the abstract's 'comparable accuracy' should be qualified to state that the quoted uncertainty is model-dependent; otherwise the comparison is an internal gap.
  2. [§3.2] The three K0 values (190±30, 220±40, 190+9/−11 MeV) are described as 'consistent', but the spread between 190 and 220 MeV is comparable to the quoted 1σ errors and originates from different model choices (momentum dependence, in-medium cross sections, initialization). Because K0 is one of the two pillars of the neutron-star pressure prediction in §5.1, the review should provide a combined estimate that includes the model spread, or explicitly justify why only the IQMD value enters the comparison. As written, the choice of K0 for Fig. 10 is a selection rather than a systematic synthesis.
  3. [§6.1; Fig. 6] The review states that the v2 data used by Danielewicz et al. [29] 'show differences with those measured by FOPI and HADES at GSI ... which questions the accuracy of the analysis.' However, Fig. 6 and §3.3 use the [29] constraint to extend the SNM pressure band up to ≈5 n_sat without a visible caveat. Since the paper itself doubts these data, the figure and the related text should mark the [29] band as uncertain (or remove it from the comparison) to avoid presenting a constraint the author does not trust.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (3)] The derivative notation '∂2E/A / ∂2ρ' should be written as ∂²(E/A)/∂ρ².
  2. [Table 1, row 8] The row for the isoscalar giant monopole resonance appears to be missing a check mark in the SNM column; the table formatting is misaligned.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The abbreviations 'FOPI' and 'DLL' are not defined in the caption; please expand them or refer to the table.
  4. [§4.1] The name 'T¨ uQMD' contains a misplaced diacritic; use the conventional spelling (e.g., TuQMD or Tübingen QMD).
  5. [§5.1] The 12.01 +0.37/−0.38 km radius is a joint astro+HIC posterior, not an HIC-only result. This should be stated explicitly to avoid overstating what HIC alone constrains.
  6. [References] Reference [65] is an unpublished oral presentation; if a peer-reviewed version exists, it should be cited instead.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: HIC constraints are externally anchored to FOPI/ASY-EOS data and the neutron-star comparison is checked against independent astronomical benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is: FOPI elliptic flow and KaoS yields -> K0=190±30 MeV (IQMD, [30]); ASY-EOS neutron/proton flow ratio -> gamma=0.72±0.19 and L=63-72 MeV (UrQMD, [45]); these constraints are then converted into a neutron-star pressure/radius band and compared with GW170817, NICER and pulsar masses ([48,49]). No step defines its output in terms of the target it is supposed to predict. K0 and L are fitted to heavy-ion observables, not to neutron-star radii or GW data; the NS pressure is obtained by forward calculation from the EoS, so the agreement with astronomy is an external benchmark rather than a tautology. Eq. 8 is an explicitly stated UrQMD power-law parametrization of Esym(ρ) and is used as a fit ansatz, not disguised as a first-principles derivation. The author's own papers ([5,30,48]) are cited, but they are not invoked as uniqueness theorems and the underlying FOPI/ASY-EOS data are external, so this is normal self-citation rather than load-bearing circularity. The paper's repeated caveat that transport-model uncertainties prevent a conclusive uncertainty determination (Abstract; §6.3) is a limitation/accuracy concern, not evidence that a result reduces to its inputs. No quoted equation or fitted parameter is re-identified as a prediction by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review contributes no new numbers; the free parameters are the fitted quantities of the cited analyses (γ, S0, K0, and the Eq. 8 coefficient) that the synthesis depends on. The dominant axioms are domain assumptions about transport models and cold-EoS extraction; if these fail, every lab constraint — and the claimed agreement with astronomical data — inherits model error. The review is transparent about this (§6.3), which is why soundness is moderate rather than high. No new entities are invented.

free parameters (4)
  • γ — power-law exponent of the potential part of E_sym (Eq. 8) = 0.72 ± 0.19
    Fitted to ASY-EOS neutron/charged-particle elliptic-flow ratios with UrQMD (§4.1, from Ref [45]); the review's headline symmetry-energy constraint.
  • 22 MeV coefficient in Eq. 8 (potential part of E_sym at ρ0) = 22 MeV
    Model parametrization splitting symmetry energy into potential and Fermi-gas kinetic (12 MeV·(ρ/ρ0)^(2/3)) parts; chosen, not derived (§4.1).
  • S0 — symmetry energy at saturation density = 34 or 31 MeV
    Assumed to convert γ into the slope parameter L = 72±13 or 63±11 MeV (§4.1); the result shifts with the choice.
  • K0 — symmetric-nuclear-matter incompressibility = 190 ± 30 MeV (IQMD); 220 ± 40 MeV (UrQMD); 190 +9/−11 MeV (dcQMD)
    Central SNM constraint from FOPI flow fits (§3.2, Refs [30,36,37]); the spread across transport codes is itself an unquantified model-systematics estimate.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Semi-classical transport models (QMD/BUU) with momentum-dependent mean fields and in-medium cross sections faithfully propagate the cold EoS into flow, kaon, and pion observables at intermediate energies.
    Load-bearing premise of every HIC constraint in §§3–4; the review itself admits the dependence: "the reliability of transport model dependencies" (Abstract) and documents inter-model spread in §3.2/§6.3.
  • domain assumption Thermal contributions decouple from the cold EoS up to temperatures of a few tens of MeV; momentum-dependent interactions absorb the thermal part.
    §2.2/§3.2: "This decoupling between cold EoS and thermal motion remains valid as long as temperatures reached in HIC do not exceed few tens of MeV."
  • standard math The EoS is quadratic in isospin asymmetry: E(ρ,δ) = E_SNM(ρ) + δ² E_sym(ρ) + O(δ⁴).
    Eq. 1, §2.1; δ⁴ and higher terms are neglected throughout.
  • domain assumption Neutron-star matter in β-equilibrium can be composed from the same SNM + symmetry-energy decomposition constrained by nuclei and HIC.
    §5.1: the review notes Ref [69] instead imposes more isospin-symmetric RMF matter, which changes the symmetry-energy sensitivity — the construction is non-unique.
  • domain assumption P = ρ² ∂(E/A)/∂ρ evaluated from HIC-derived finite-temperature energies equals the T=0 pressure governing neutron stars.
    Eq. 2, §2.2; the review lists the breakdown reasons above ~100 MeV (§6.3: mean-field picture fails).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 23211 in / 29392 out tokens · 247228 ms · 2026-08-02T09:39:14.164098+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In the past decades, heavy-ion collisions (HIC) at intermediate energies have allowed to probe the nuclear equation-of-state (EoS) of both symmetric and asymmetric nuclear matter over a broad range of densities. In particular, flow has proven to be a powerful observable. Combining the symmetry energy and the symmetric nuclear matter constraints of the EoS from HIC allowed to predict a density dependence of the pressure in a neutron star, up to about 2.5 times saturation density ($n_{sat}$), which agrees with recent astronomical measurements deduced from gravitational waves and pulsar observations. So far, the accuracy from HIC expectations is comparable to the latter up to 1.5 $n_{sat}$. In these studies, a fundamental aspect is the determination of the profile of densities that are probed by experimental observables used to constrain the EoS. In the near future, new experiments like ASY-EOS performed at higher incident energy and with better accuracy will push further the frontier of the knowledge of the symmetry energy at higher density. These efforts cannot be conclusive without a reliable uncertainty determination, which is related to the reliability of transport model dependencies. Improvements and breakthroughs in transport model simulations and nuclear theory are therefore expected in a joint effort towards HIC contributions to the field of neutron-star physics, including the contribution of strangeness and of the QCD phase transition.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Effects of light-cluster degrees of freedom on collective flows in heavy-ion collisions at FOPI energies

    nucl-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    Explicitly propagating light clusters in a Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck transport model substantially modifies predicted proton v1-v4 flows at low FOPI energies (120-400 A MeV) but not above 600 A MeV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Li, B.-A., Chen, L.-W. & Ko, C. M. Recent progress and new challenges in isospin physics with heavy-ion reactions.Physics Reports464, 113–281 (2008). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157308001269

    2008

  2. [2]

    Burgio, G. F. & Vida˜ na, I. The equation of state of nuclear matter: From finite nuclei to neutron stars.Universe6(2020). URL https://www.mdpi.com/ 2218-1997/6/8/119

    2020

  3. [3]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/878/1/012031

    Hanauske, M.et al.Concluding remarks: Connecting relativistic heavy ion colli- sions and neutron star mergers by the equation of state of dense hadron- and quark matter as signalled by gravitational waves.Journal of Physics: Conference Series 878, 012031 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/878/1/012031

    doi:10.1088/1742-6596/878/1/012031 2017

  4. [4]

    D., Lang, R

    Hinderer, T., Lackey, B. D., Lang, R. N. & Read, J. S. Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspiral.Phys. Rev. D81, 123016 (2010). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123016

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.123016 2010

  5. [5]

    & Aichelin, J

    Le F` evre, A., Leifels, Y., Hartnack, C. & Aichelin, J. Origin of elliptic flow and its dependence on the equation of state in heavy ion reactions at intermediate energies.Phys. Rev. C98, 034901 (2018). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevC.98.034901

    2018

  6. [6]

    Y., Tsang, M

    Tsang, C. Y., Tsang, M. B., Lynch, W. G., Kumar, R. & Horowitz, C. J. Deter- mination of the equation of state from nuclear experiments and neutron star observations.Nature Astronomy8, 328–336 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41550-023-02161-z. 30

    2024

  7. [7]

    B.et al.Isospin diffusion and the nuclear symmetry energy in heavy ion reactions.Phys

    Tsang, M. B.et al.Isospin diffusion and the nuclear symmetry energy in heavy ion reactions.Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 062701 (2004). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.062701

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.062701 2004

  8. [8]

    B.et al.Constraints on the density dependence of the symmetry energy.Phys

    Tsang, M. B.et al.Constraints on the density dependence of the symmetry energy.Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 122701 (2009). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.102.122701

    2009

  9. [9]

    Tamii, A.et al.Complete electric dipole response and the neutron skin in 208Pb. Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 062502 (2011). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.062502

    2011

  10. [10]

    Piekarewicz, J.et al.Electric dipole polarizability and the neutron skin.Phys. Rev. C85, 041302 (2012). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.85. 041302

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.85 2012

  11. [11]

    URL https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319307671

    Morfouace, P.et al.Constraining the symmetry energy with heavy-ion collisions and bayesian analyses.Physics Letters B799, 135045 (2019). URL https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319307671

    2019

  12. [12]

    Adhikari, D.et al.Accurate determination of the neutron skin thickness of 208Pb through parity-violation in electron scattering.Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 172502 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172502

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.172502 2021

  13. [13]

    & Warda, M

    Roca-Maza, X., Centelles, M., Vi˜ nas, X. & Warda, M. Neutron skin of 208Pb, nuclear symmetry energy, and the parity radius experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 252501 (2011). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.252501

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.252501 2011

  14. [14]

    & Lee, J

    Danielewicz, P. & Lee, J. Symmetry energy II: Isobaric analog states.Nuclear Physics A922, 1–70 (2014). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0375947413007872

    2014

  15. [15]

    Brown, B. A. Constraints on the skyrme equations of state from properties of doubly magic nuclei.Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 232502 (2013). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.232502

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.232502 2013

  16. [16]

    & Chen, L.-W

    Zhang, Z. & Chen, L.-W. Constraining the symmetry energy at subsatura- tion densities using isotope binding energy difference and neutron skin thickness. Physics Letters B726, 234–238 (2013). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S037026931300628X

    2013

  17. [17]

    Roca-Maza, X.et al.Giant quadrupole resonances in 208P b, the nuclear symmetry energy, and the neutron skin thickness.Phys. Rev. C87, 034301 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034301

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.034301 2013

  18. [18]

    Nuclear compressibilities.Physics Reports64, 171–248 (1980)

    Blaizot, J. Nuclear compressibilities.Physics Reports64, 171–248 (1980). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370157380900010. 31

    arXiv 1980

  19. [19]

    H., Clark, H

    Youngblood, D. H., Clark, H. L. & Lui, Y.-W. Incompressibility of nuclear matter from the giant monopole resonance.Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 691–694 (1999). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.691

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.691 1999

  20. [20]

    & Margueron, J

    Khan, E. & Margueron, J. Determination of the density dependence of the nuclear incompressibility.Phys. Rev. C88, 034319 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.034319

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.034319 2013

  21. [21]

    St¨ ocker, H., Maruhn, J. A. & Greiner, W. Collective sideward flow of nuclear matter in violent high-energy heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 725–728 (1980). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.725

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.44.725 1980

  22. [22]

    Probing the high density behavior of the nuclear symmetry energy with high energy heavy-ion collisions.Phys

    Li, B.-A. Probing the high density behavior of the nuclear symmetry energy with high energy heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 192701 (2002). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.192701

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.192701 2002

  23. [23]

    & Zuo, W

    Li, B.-A., Yong, G.-C. & Zuo, W. Near-threshold pion production with radioactive beams.Phys. Rev. C71, 014608 (2005). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.71.014608

    2005

  24. [24]

    Estee, J.et al.Probing the symmetry energy with the spectral pion ratio. Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 162701 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.126.162701

    2021

  25. [25]

    Aichelin, J. & Ko, C. M. Subthreshold kaon production as a probe of the nuclear equation of state.Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2661–2663 (1985). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2661

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2661 1985

  26. [26]

    Hartnack, C., Oeschler, H., Leifels, Y., Bratkovskaya, E. L. & Aichelin, J. Strangeness production close to the threshold in proton–nucleus and heavy-ion collisions.Physics Reports510, 119–200 (2012). URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S037015731100247X. Strangeness production close to the threshold in proton–nucleus and heavy-ion collisions

    2012

  27. [27]

    Sturm, C.et al.Evidence for a soft nuclear equation-of-state from kaon production in heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 39–42 (2001). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.39

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.39 2001

  28. [28]

    Lopez, X.et al.Isospin dependence of relative yields ofK + andK 0 mesons at 1.528A GeV.Phys. Rev. C75, 011901 (2007). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevC.75.011901

    2007

  29. [29]

    & Lynch, W

    Danielewicz, P., Lacey, R. & Lynch, W. G. Determination of the equation of state of dense matter.Science298, 1592–1596 (2002). URL https://www.science.org/ doi/abs/10.1126/science.1078070. 32

    doi:10.1126/science.1078070 2002

  30. [30]

    & Hartnack, C

    Le F` evre, A., Leifels, Y., Reisdorf, W., Aichelin, J. & Hartnack, C. Constraining the nuclear matter equation of state around twice saturation density.Nuclear Physics A945, 112–133 (2016). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0375947415002225

    2016

  31. [31]

    Hartnack, C.et al.Modeling the many body dynamics of heavy ion collisions: Present status and future perspective.Eur. Phys. J. A1, 151–169 (1998). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s100500050045

    doi:10.1007/s100500050045 1998

  32. [32]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/28/7/313

    Fuchs, C.et al.The nuclear equation of state probed byK + production in heavy ion collisions.Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics28, 1615 (2002). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/28/7/313

    doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/7/313 2002

  33. [33]

    & Aichelin, J

    Hartnack, C., Oeschler, H. & Aichelin, J. Hadronic matter is soft.Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 012302 (2006). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96. 012302

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96 2006

  34. [34]

    & Trautmann, W

    Andronic, A., Lukasik, J., Reisdorf, W. & Trautmann, W. Systematics of stopping and flow in Au+Au collisions.European Physical Journal A30, 31–46 (2006). URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2006-10101-2

    doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-10101-2 2006

  35. [35]

    URL https://www

    Reisdorf, W.et al.Systematics of azimuthal asymmetries in heavy ion collisions in the 1A GeV regime.Nuclear Physics A876, 1–60 (2012). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947411006877

    2012

  36. [36]

    Physics Letters B778, 207–212 (2018)

    Wang, Y.et al.Determination of the nuclear incompressibility from the rapidity- dependent elliptic flow in heavy-ion collisions at beam energies 0.4A–1.0A GeV. Physics Letters B778, 207–212 (2018). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0370269318300431

    2018

  37. [37]

    Cozma, M. D. Equation of state of nuclear matter from collective flows and stopping in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C110, 064911 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.064911

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.064911 2024

  38. [38]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/31/11/ 016

    Li, Q.et al.Probing the density dependence of the symmetry potential in intermediate-energy heavy ion collisions.Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Par- ticle Physics31, 1359 (2005). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/31/11/ 016

    doi:10.1088/0954-3899/31/11/ 2005

  39. [39]

    Cozma, M. D. The impact of energy conservation in transport models on the π−/π+ multiplicity ratio in heavy-ion collisions and the symmetry energy.Phys. Lett. B753, 166–172 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12. 015

    doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12 2016

  40. [40]

    A., Mohs, J., Andronic, A., Elfner, H

    Tarasovicov´ a, L. A., Mohs, J., Andronic, A., Elfner, H. & Kampert, K.-H. Flow and equation of state of nuclear matter ate kin/a= 0.25–1.5 GeV with the SMASH transport approach.Eur. Phys. J. A60, 232 (2024). URL https: 33 //doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01445-w

    doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01445-w 2024

  41. [41]

    St¨ ocker, H.et al.Jets of nuclear matter from high energy heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C25, 1873–1876 (1982). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.25.1873

    1982

  42. [42]

    Andronic, A.et al.Directed flow in Au+Au, Xe+CsI, and Ni+Ni collisions and the nuclear equation of state.Phys. Rev. C67, 034907 (2003). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.034907

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.67.034907 2003

  43. [43]

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14255

    Zhou, Y.et al.Probing of EoS with clusters and hypernuclei (2025). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14255. arXiv:2507.14255

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    J.et al.A way forward in the study of the symmetry energy: experiment, theory, and observation.J

    Horowitz, C. J.et al.A way forward in the study of the symmetry energy: experiment, theory, and observation.J. Phys. G41, 093001 (2014)

    2014

  45. [45]

    Russotto, P.et al.Results of the ASY-EOS experiment at GSI: The symmetry energy at suprasaturation density.Phys. Rev. C94, 034608 (2016). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.034608

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.034608 2016

  46. [46]

    Lynch, W. G. & Tsang, M. B. Decoding the density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy.Phys. Lett. B830, 137098 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    High density behaviour of nuclear symmetry energy and high energy heavy-ion collisions.Nuclear Physics A708, 365–390 (2002)

    Li, B.-A. High density behaviour of nuclear symmetry energy and high energy heavy-ion collisions.Nuclear Physics A708, 365–390 (2002). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947402010187

    2002

  48. [48]

    Nuovo Cim.46, 1–70 (2023)

    Russotto, P.et al.Studies of the equation-of-state of nuclear matter by heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energy in the multi-messenger era: A review focused on GSI results.Riv. Nuovo Cim.46, 1–70 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40766-023-00039-4

    2023

  49. [49]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-04750-w

    Huth, S.et al.Constraining neutron-star matter with microscopic and macro- scopic collisions.Nature606, 276–280 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-04750-w

    2022

  50. [50]

    & Schwenk, A

    Drischler, C., Hebeler, K. & Schwenk, A. Chiral interactions up to next-to-next- to-next-to-leading order and nuclear saturation.Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 042501 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.042501

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.042501 2019

  51. [51]

    Trautmann, W.et al.The symmetry energy in nuclear reactions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. E19, 1653–1663 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218301310016077

    2010

  52. [52]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S037026931100178X

    Russotto, P.et al.Symmetry energy from elliptic flow in 197Au+ 197 Au.Physics Letters B697, 471–476 (2011). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S037026931100178X. 34

    2011

  53. [53]

    Cozma, M. D. Neutron–proton elliptic flow difference as a probe for the high den- sity dependence of the symmetry energy.Physics Letters B700, 139–144 (2011). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269311004837

    2011

  54. [54]

    D., Leifels, Y., Trautmann, W., Li, Q

    Cozma, M. D., Leifels, Y., Trautmann, W., Li, Q. & Russotto, P. Toward a model-independent constraint of the high-density dependence of the symmetry energy.Phys. Rev. C88, 044912 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.88.044912

    2013

  55. [55]

    & Rizzo, J

    Giordano, V., Colonna, M., Di Toro, M., Greco, V. & Rizzo, J. Isospin emission and flow at high baryon density: A test of the symmetry potential.Phys. Rev. C 81, 044611 (2010). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.044611

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.81.044611 2010

  56. [56]

    Leifels, Y.et al.Exclusive studies of neutron and charged particle emission in collisions of 197Au + 197Au at 400 MeV/nucleon.Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 963–966 (1993). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.963

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.963 1993

  57. [57]

    Lambrecht, D.et al.Energy dependence of collective flow of neutrons and protons in 197Au+ 197 Aucollisions.Z. Phys. A350, 115–120 (1994). URL https://doi. org/10.1007/BF01290679

    doi:10.1007/bf01290679 1994

  58. [58]

    & Wolter, H

    Fuchs, C. & Wolter, H. H. Modelization of the EOS.Eur. Phys. J. A30, 5–21 (2006). URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2005-10313-x

    doi:10.1140/epja/i2005-10313-x 2006

  59. [59]

    URL https://www

    Reisdorf, W.et al.Systematics of pion emission in heavy ion collisions in the 1A GeV regime.Nuclear Physics A781, 459–508 (2007). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947406007676

    2007

  60. [60]

    Xu, J.et al.Understanding transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions at 100A and 400AMeV: Comparison of heavy-ion transport codes under controlled con- ditions.Phys. Rev. C93, 044609 (2016). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.93.044609

    2016

  61. [61]

    Zhang, Y.-X.et al.Comparison of heavy-ion transport simulations: Collision integral in a box.Phys. Rev. C97, 034625 (2018). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034625

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.034625 2018

  62. [62]

    Ono, A.et al.Comparison of heavy-ion transport simulations: Collision integral with pions and ∆ resonances in a box.Phys. Rev. C100, 044617 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.044617

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.044617 2019

  63. [63]

    Colonna, M.et al.Comparison of heavy-ion transport simulations: Mean-field dynamics in a box.Phys. Rev. C104, 024603 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024603

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.024603 2021

  64. [64]

    35 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641022000230

    Wolter, H.et al.Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics125, 103962 (2022). 35 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641022000230

    2022

  65. [65]

    Cozma, M. D. Relevance of non-resonant contributions to pion pro- duction in heavy-ion reactions close to threshold. Oral presenta- tion at theXIII th International Symposium on Nuclear Symmetry Energy (2025). URL https://indico2.riken.jp/event/5134/contributions/26802/ attachments/14110/21202/cozma nusym25.pdf. Kobe, Japan, 8–13 September 2025

    2025

  66. [66]

    & Chen, L.-W

    Li, B.-A. & Chen, L.-W. Neutron–proton effective mass splitting in neutron- rich matter and its impacts on nuclear reactions.Modern Physics Letters A30, 1530010 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732315300104

    doi:10.1142/s0217732315300104 2015

  67. [67]

    Coupland, D. D. S.et al.Probing effective nucleon masses with heavy-ion col- lisions.Phys. Rev. C94, 011601(R) (2016). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevC.94.011601

    2016

  68. [68]

    High density with elliptic flows.AIP Conference Proceedings 2127, 020003 (2019)

    Trautmann, W. High density with elliptic flows.AIP Conference Proceedings 2127, 020003 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5117793

    doi:10.1063/1.5117793 2019

  69. [69]

    & Schaffner-Bielich, J

    Ghosh, S., Chatterjee, D. & Schaffner-Bielich, J. Imposing multi-physics con- straints at different densities on the neutron Star Equation of State.Eur. Phys. J. A58, 37 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00679-w

    doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00679-w 2022

  70. [70]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641023000613

    Sorensen, A.et al.Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion col- lisions.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics134, 104080 (2024). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641023000613

    2024

  71. [71]

    Cozma, M. D. & Trautmann, W. Neutron star radii from laboratory experi- ments.Int. J. Mod. Phys. E34, 2530001 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218301325300012

    2025

  72. [72]

    & Landry, P

    Legred, I., Chatziioannou, K., Essick, R., Han, S. & Landry, P. Impact of the PSR J0740 + 6620 radius constraint on the properties of high-density matter.Phys. Rev. D104, 063003 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD. 104.063003

    doi:10.1103/physrevd 2021

  73. [73]

    A.et al.Motivations for Early High-Profile FRIB Experiments (2024)

    Brown, B. A.et al.Motivations for Early High-Profile FRIB Experiments (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06144. arXiv:2410.06144

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    FRIB400: The Scientific Case for the 400 MeV/u Energy Upgrade of FRIB (2019)

    FRIB Science Community. FRIB400: The Scientific Case for the 400 MeV/u Energy Upgrade of FRIB (2019). URL https://frib.msu.edu/ files/pdfs/frib400 final.pdf. Updated February 2023, accessed 2023-07-16

    2019

  75. [75]

    & Wolter, H

    Greco, V., Colonna, M., Di Toro, M. & Wolter, H. H. Probing the symmetry energy at high baryon density with heavy ion collisions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. E19, 1664 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301310016089. 36

    doi:10.1142/s0218301310016089 2010

  76. [76]

    & Zhang, M

    Xiao, Z., Li, B.-A., Chen, L.-W., Yong, G.-C. & Zhang, M. Circumstantial evi- dence for a soft nuclear symmetry energy at suprasaturation densities.Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 062502 (2009). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 102.062502

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2009

  77. [77]

    & Wolter, H

    Ferini, G., Gaitanos, T., Colonna, M., Di Toro, M. & Wolter, H. H. Isospin effects on subthreshold kaon production at intermediate energies.Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 202301 (2006). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.202301

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.202301 2006

  78. [78]

    & Lin, Z.-W

    Yong, G.-C., Li, B.-A., Xiao, Z.-G. & Lin, Z.-W. Probing the high-density nuclear symmetry energy with the Ξ −/Ξ0 ratio in heavy-ion collisions at √sN N ≈3 GeV.Phys. Rev. C106, 024902 (2022). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.106.024902

    2022

  79. [79]

    Collision dynamics at medium and relativistic energies.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics113, 103775 (2020)

    Colonna, M. Collision dynamics at medium and relativistic energies.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics113, 103775 (2020). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641020300223

    2020

  80. [80]

    C.et al.Dynamical phase trajectories for relativistic nuclear colli- sions.Phys

    Arsene, I. C.et al.Dynamical phase trajectories for relativistic nuclear colli- sions.Phys. Rev. C75, 034902 (2007). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.75.034902

    2007

Showing first 80 references.