Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

A self-consistent single-fluid framework for neutron stars admixed with mirror dark matter

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-02 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Mirror dark matter admixed with neutron stars softens the equation of state and lowers their maximum masses.

desk verdict The paper couples mirror DM to baryons via mutual chemical-potential shifts but still fixes the global DM fraction as input, so the reported EOS softening and NS changes are conditional on that choice. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.00888 v1 pith:DPUVYIZ7 submitted 2026-07-01 astro-ph.HE

Adamu Issifu , Constança Providência , Franciele M. da Silva , Débora P. Menezes , Tobias Frederico This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords neutronstarsdarkmattermirrorequationofstatedirectUrcaprocesscompactstellarcooling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a self-consistent single-fluid model for neutron stars containing mirror dark matter, where the two sectors interact via a vector current-current coupling that links their chemical potentials. The dark matter fraction is held fixed globally while its local density follows the baryonic density. Calculations with several nuclear models show that this interaction reduces the incompressibility of matter, softens the overall equation of state, raises central densities, and decreases the maximum supported mass. The onset of the direct Urca cooling process moves to higher densities, altering when rapid cooling begins depending on the symmetry energy.

What carries the argument

Contact vector current-current interaction that couples the chemical potentials of dark matter and baryonic matter through mutual mean-field shifts, with fixed global DM fraction as input.

What would settle it

An observed neutron star mass exceeding the lowered maximum for any dark matter fraction allowed by the model, or cooling data showing rapid cooling onset at masses inconsistent with the predicted shift in direct Urca threshold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We develop a self-consistent framework based on a contact vector current-current interaction that couples the chemical potentials of both sectors through mutual mean-field shifts, with the dark matter fraction F_D = N_D/N_B fixed as a global input parameter. This formulation provides a physically motivated alternative to fixed-density prescriptions, allowing the local DM density to follow the baryonic matter density throughout the stellar interior. As an application, we consider a mirror-DM scenario with exact symmetry between the dark and visible sectors and investigate NS matter using the NL3ωρ, FSU2R, NL3, and DDME2 equations of state. We find that the DM-BM interaction weakens the bindin

Load-bearing premise

The dark matter fraction is treated as a fixed global input parameter and mirror dark matter is assumed to have exact symmetry with the visible sector.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Maximum masses of neutron stars decrease with increasing dark matter fraction.
  • Central densities and compactness of neutron stars increase.
  • The direct Urca process onset moves to higher stellar densities.
  • Rapid cooling onsets shift to more massive stars for stiff symmetry energy models and to less massive stars for soft symmetry energy models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Mass-radius measurements from gravitational wave events could be reinterpreted to bound the dark matter fraction in neutron stars.
  • The model suggests that scatter in observed neutron star properties might partly arise from varying dark matter admixtures between individual stars.
  • Cooling curve data from isolated neutron stars offers a potential observational test independent of mass limits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a single-fluid framework for neutron stars admixed with mirror dark matter based on a contact vector current-current interaction that mutually shifts chemical potentials between baryonic and dark sectors, with the global DM fraction F_D = N_D/N_B imposed as a fixed input parameter. This allows local DM density to track baryonic density. For the NL3ωρ, FSU2R, NL3, and DDME2 RMF equations of state under exact mirror symmetry, the interaction is reported to weaken binding, reduce incompressibility, soften the EOS, raise central densities and compactness, lower maximum masses, and shift the direct Urca onset (to higher masses for stiff symmetry energy models and lower masses for soft ones).

Significance. If the framework holds, the approach supplies a density-following alternative to fixed-density DM prescriptions and yields testable implications for NS maximum masses and cooling curves across multiple EOS families, with potential relevance to multimessenger constraints. Explicit use of four distinct RMF models is a positive feature that allows qualitative trends to be checked for robustness.

major comments (2)
  1. [Framework description] Framework section (abstract and model description): the claim of self-consistency rests on the contact interaction shifting chemical potentials, yet F_D is introduced and held fixed as a global input rather than obtained by solving the coupled equilibrium conditions together with total particle-number conservation; this renders the reported EOS softening, central-density increase, M_max reduction, and Urca shift conditional on externally chosen F_D values.
  2. [Application to RMF EOS models] Results paragraphs for the four EOS models: the shifts in Urca onset and maximum mass are stated only qualitatively, with no tabulated values, no error estimates on the density or mass changes, and no explicit comparison of the interaction-modified EOS against the baseline case at the same F_D; this weakens the ability to judge the size of the reported effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Framework description] Notation for the vector coupling strength and the precise form of the mean-field shift in the chemical potentials should be written explicitly (ideally with an equation) rather than described only in words.
  2. [Framework description] The statement that local DM density 'follows' the baryonic density needs a short clarification of how the single-fluid ansatz enforces this while keeping the global ratio fixed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Framework section (abstract and model description): the claim of self-consistency rests on the contact interaction shifting chemical potentials, yet F_D is introduced and held fixed as a global input parameter rather than obtained by solving the coupled equilibrium conditions together with total particle-number conservation; this renders the reported EOS softening, central-density increase, M_max reduction, and Urca shift conditional on externally chosen F_D values.

    Authors: We agree that F_D is imposed as a fixed global input parameter and that the quantitative results depend on the specific value chosen for it. The self-consistency of the framework refers to the local DM density being determined dynamically via the mutual mean-field shifts once F_D is specified, rather than being prescribed independently at each density. We will revise the text to make this distinction explicit and to emphasize that F_D functions as a model parameter analogous to those in other admixture studies. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results paragraphs for the four EOS models: the shifts in Urca onset and maximum mass are stated only qualitatively, with no tabulated values, no error estimates on the density or mass changes, and no explicit comparison of the interaction-modified EOS against the baseline case at the same F_D; this weakens the ability to judge the size of the reported effects.

    Authors: We accept that the results section would benefit from quantitative presentation. In the revised manuscript we will include tables listing the changes in maximum mass, central density, and the stellar mass at direct Urca onset for each of the four RMF models, both with and without the DM interaction, evaluated at the same fixed F_D values. This will enable direct comparison to the baseline cases. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; framework treats F_D explicitly as input

full rationale

The paper states that F_D is fixed as a global input parameter and computes consequences for the EOS and stellar structure from the contact interaction and chosen RMF models (NL3ωρ, FSU2R, NL3, DDME2). No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted quantity by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise rest on self-citation chains or imported uniqueness theorems. The mean-field coupling of chemical potentials is defined independently of the fixed F_D, and results are presented as conditional on that parameter. This is a standard parametric study with no self-definitional or renaming circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on treating the dark-matter fraction as a fixed global parameter and on assuming exact mirror symmetry between sectors; these choices are stated explicitly in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • F_D = N_D/N_B
    Fixed as a global input parameter that sets the overall dark-matter content.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Exact symmetry between dark and visible sectors
    Invoked when applying the framework to the mirror-DM scenario.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A self-consistent single-fluid framework for neutron stars admixed with mirror dark matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DPUVYIZ7

@misc{pith2026260700888,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A self-consistent single-fluid framework for neutron stars admixed with mirror dark matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DPUVYIZ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.00888}
}
abstract

We develop a self-consistent framework based on a contact vector current-current interaction that couples the chemical potentials of both sectors through mutual mean-field shifts, with the dark matter (DM) fraction $F_D = N_D/N_B$ fixed as a global input parameter. This formulation provides a physically motivated alternative to fixed-density prescriptions, allowing the local DM density to follow the baryonic matter (BM) density throughout the stellar interior. As an application, we consider a mirror-DM scenario with exact symmetry between the dark and visible sectors and investigate NS matter using the NL3$\omega\rho$, FSU2R, NL3, and DDME2 equations of state (EOSs). We find that the DM--BM interaction weakens the binding of dense matter, reduces its incompressibility, and softens the EOS. Consequently, DM increases the central density and compactness of NSs, lowers their maximum masses, and shifts the onset of the direct Urca process to higher stellar densities. As a consequence, the onset of rapid cooling is shifted to more massive stars for models with a stiff symmetry energy and to less massive stars for models with a soft symmetry energy, depending on the extra compactness that results from the DM admixture. These results demonstrate that mirror-DM admixtures modify both the microscopic composition and macroscopic structure of NSs, with potential implications for their thermal evolution and multimessenger observational signatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00888 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the mass-radius relation for the three different EOS models studied in this work: NL3ωρ (blue), DDME2 (red), and FSU2R (green), without DM (solid line) and with 2% (dashed), 5% (dot-dash), and 10% (dotted) DM. In addition, the credibility regions for GW170817, HE…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: displays the mean-field BM–DM interac￾tion term, L MF DB = αnBnD, which, upon substituting nD = FDnB, (see the discussion below eq. (27)), becomes L MF DB = αFDn 2 B. This expression shows that the BM–DM interaction is governed by the local baryon density, α, and FD (d…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A self-consistent Higgs-portal framework for dark matter--admixed neutron stars: Collider-motivated benchmarks meet multimessenger constraints

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding heavy dark matter to neutron stars via nχ=FχnB softens the equation of state and lowers the maximum mass, but the vector interaction invoked is numerically negligible.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    and FAPESP Thematic Grants (2023/13749-1 and 2024/17816-8). F.M.S. would like to thank CNPq for fi- nancial support under research project No. 403007/2024-0 and research fellowship No. 201145/2025-1. This work was partially supported by national funds from FCT (Funda¸ c˜ ao para a Ciˆ encia e a Tecnologia, I.P, Portu- gal) under project UID/04564/2025, id...

    work page doi:10.54499/uidb/04564/2025 2023

  2. [2]

    V. C. Rubin, W. K. Ford, Jr., and N. Thonnard, Rota- tional properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R=4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R=122kpc)., Astrophys. J.238, 471 (1980)

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    Bosma, 21-cm line studies of spiral galaxies

    A. Bosma, 21-cm line studies of spiral galaxies. II. The distribution and kinematics of neutral hydrogen in spiral galaxies of various morphological types., ApJ86, 1825 (1981)

    work page 1981

  4. [4]

    A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zaritsky, A direct empir- 16 ical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.648, L109 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608407

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution

    V. Springelet al., Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution, Nature435, 629 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504097

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(Planck), Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.594, A13 (2016), arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Totani, 20 GeV halo-like excess of the Galactic diffuse emission and implications for dark matter annihilation, JCAP11, 080 (2025), arXiv:2507.07209 [astro-ph.HE]

    T. Totani, 20 GeV halo-like excess of the Galactic diffuse emission and implications for dark matter annihilation, JCAP11, 080, arXiv:2507.07209 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Profumo, Dark baryon black holes, Phys

    S. Profumo, Dark baryon black holes, Phys. Rev. D111, 095010 (2025), arXiv:2502.16439 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 111302 (2018), arXiv:1805.12562 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), WIMP Dark Matter Search Using a 3.1 Tonne-Year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), WIMP Dark Matter Search Using a 3.1 Tonne-Year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 221003 (2025), arXiv:2502.18005 [hep-ex]

    2025

  3. [11]

    Aalberset al.(LZ), Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys

    J. Aalberset al.(LZ), Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 011802 (2025), arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Boet al.(PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys

    Z. Boet al.(PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025), arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex]

    2025

  5. [13]

    Kouvaris, WIMP Annihilation and Cooling of Neutron Stars, Phys

    C. Kouvaris, WIMP Annihilation and Cooling of Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. D77, 023006 (2008), arXiv:0708.2362 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Issifu, P

    A. Issifu, P. Thakur, F. M. da Silva, K. D. Marquez, D. P. Menezes, M. Dutra, O. Louren¸ co, and T. Frederico, Supernova remnants with mirror dark matter and hyper- ons, Phys. Rev. D111, 083026 (2025), arXiv:2412.17946 [hep-ph]

    2025

  7. [15]

    L. L. Lopes and A. Issifu, XTE J1814-338 as a dark mat- ter admixed neutron star, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101922 (2025), arXiv:2411.17105 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  8. [16]

    de Lavallaz and M

    A. de Lavallaz and M. Fairbairn, Neutron Stars as Dark Matter Probes, Phys. Rev. D81, 123521 (2010), arXiv:1004.0629 [astro-ph.GA]

    2010 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kouvaris and P

    C. Kouvaris and P. Tinyakov, Can Neutron stars con- strain Dark Matter?, Phys. Rev. D82, 063531 (2010), arXiv:1004.0586 [astro-ph.GA]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

    2005 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Shakeri and D

    S. Shakeri and D. R. Karkevandi, Bosonic dark matter in light of the NICER precise mass-radius measurements, Phys. Rev. D109, 043029 (2024), arXiv:2210.17308 [astro- ph.HE]

    2024

  12. [20]

    A. Das, T. Malik, and A. C. Nayak, Dark matter admixed neutron star properties in light of gravitational wave observations: A two fluid approach, Phys. Rev. D105, 123034 (2022), arXiv:2011.01318 [nucl-th]

    2022

  13. [21]

    Issifu, P

    A. Issifu, P. Thakur, D. R. Karkevandi, F. M. da Silva, D. P. Menezes, Y. Lim, and T. Frederico, Dark matter heating in evolving protoneutron stars: A two-fluid ap- proach, Phys. Rev. D113, 103042 (2026)

    2026

  14. [22]

    Thakur, T

    P. Thakur, T. Malik, A. Das, T. K. Jha, and C. Providˆ encia, Exploring robust correlations between fermionic dark matter model parameters and neutron star properties: A two-fluid perspective, Phys. Rev. D109, 043030 (2024), arXiv:2308.00650 [hep-ph]

    2024

  15. [23]

    D. R. Karkevandi, S. Shakeri, V. Sagun, and O. Ivanyt- skyi, Bosonic dark matter in neutron stars and its effect on gravitational wave signal, Phys. Rev. D105, 023001 (2022), arXiv:2109.03801 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  16. [24]

    Issifu, A

    A. Issifu, A. Konstantinou, P. Thakur, and T. Frederico, Rotating protoneutron star admixed with mirror dark matter: A two-fluid approach, Phys. Rev. D112, 103026 (2025), arXiv:2507.20823 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  17. [25]

    Kain, Dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys

    B. Kain, Dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D103, 043009 (2021), arXiv:2102.08257 [gr-qc]

    2021

  18. [26]

    Biesdorf, J

    C. Biesdorf, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and L. Tolos, Masquerad- ing hybrid stars with dark matter, Phys. Rev. D111, 083038 (2025), arXiv:2412.05207 [hep-ph]

    2025

  19. [27]

    Rezaei, Study of Dark-Matter Admixed Neutron Stars using the Equation of State from the Rotational Curves of Galaxies, Astrophys

    Z. Rezaei, Study of Dark-Matter Admixed Neutron Stars using the Equation of State from the Rotational Curves of Galaxies, Astrophys. J.835, 33 (2017), arXiv:1612.02804 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bertoni, A

    B. Bertoni, A. E. Nelson, and S. Reddy, Dark Matter Thermalization in Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. D88, 123505 (2013), arXiv:1309.1721 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bramante, K

    J. Bramante, K. Fukushima, J. Kumar, and E. Stopnitzky, Bounds on self-interacting fermion dark matter from ob- servations of old neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D89, 015010 (2014), arXiv:1310.3509 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A. Das, T. Malik, and A. C. Nayak, Confronting nuclear equation of state in the presence of dark matter using GW170817 observation in relativistic mean field theory ap- proach, Phys. Rev. D99, 043016 (2019), arXiv:1807.10013 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Issifu, D

    A. Issifu, D. P. Menezes, and T. Frederico, Proto-neutron stars with dark matter admixture: A single-fluid approach, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102149 (2025), arXiv:2506.21378 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  24. [32]

    H. C. Das, A. Kumar, B. Kumar, S. Kumar Biswal, T. Nakatsukasa, A. Li, and S. K. Patra, Effects of dark matter on the nuclear and neutron star matter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.495, 4893 (2020), arXiv:2002.00594 [nucl-th]

    2020

  25. [33]

    M. I. Gresham and K. M. Zurek, Asymmetric Dark Stars and Neutron Star Stability, Phys. Rev. D99, 083008 (2019), arXiv:1809.08254 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Sahoo, S

    R. Sahoo, S. Mukhopadhyay, and M. Bhuyan, Dark matter admixed white dwarfs: A single-fluid approach, Phys. Rev. D113, 123005 (2026), arXiv:2511.17120 [astro-ph.SR]

    2026

  27. [35]

    Garani, Y

    R. Garani, Y. Genolini, and T. Hambye, New analysis of neutron star constraints on asymmetric dark matter, JCAP2019, 035 (2019), arXiv:1812.08773 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Bramante and N

    J. Bramante and N. Raj, Dark matter in compact stars, Phys. Rept.1052, 1 (2024), arXiv:2307.14435 [hep-ph]

    2024

  29. [37]

    Sen and A

    D. Sen and A. Guha, Implications of feebly interacting dark sector on neutron star properties and constraints from GW170817, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.504, 3354 (2021), arXiv:2104.06141 [hep-ph]

    2021

  30. [38]

    Guha and D

    A. Guha and D. Sen, Constraining the mass of fermionic dark matter from its feeble interaction with hadronic matter via dark mediators in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D109, 043038 (2024), arXiv:2401.14419 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  31. [39]

    Panotopoulos and I

    G. Panotopoulos and I. Lopes, Dark matter effect on realistic equation of state in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 96, 083004 (2017), arXiv:1709.06312 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Narain, J

    G. Narain, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and I. N. Mishustin, Com- pact stars made of fermionic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 74, 063003 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0605724

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    T. F. Motta, P. A. M. Guichon, and A. W. Thomas, Neutron to Dark Matter Decay in Neutron Stars, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33, 1844020 (2018), arXiv:1806.00903 17 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    G. Baym, D. H. Beck, P. Geltenbort, and J. Shelton, Testing dark decays of baryons in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 061801 (2018), arXiv:1802.08282 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Husain, T

    W. Husain, T. F. Motta, and A. W. Thomas, Conse- quences of neutron decay inside neutron stars, JCAP 2022, 028 (2022), arXiv:2203.02758 [hep-ph]

    2022

  36. [44]

    N. F. Bell, G. Busoni, S. Robles, and M. Virgato, Ther- malization and annihilation of dark matter in neutron stars, JCAP2024, 006 (2024), arXiv:2312.11892 [hep-ph]

    2024

  37. [45]

    J. M. Berryman, S. Gardner, and M. Zakeri, How macro- scopic limits on neutron-star baryon loss yield microscopic limits on non-standard-model baryon decay, Phys. Rev. D109, 023021 (2024), arXiv:2305.13377 [hep-ph]

    2024

  38. [46]

    Garani, A

    R. Garani, A. Gupta, and N. Raj, Observing the ther- malization of dark matter in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043019 (2021), arXiv:2009.10728 [hep-ph]

    2021

  39. [47]

    Oliveira, C

    O. Oliveira, C. A. Bertulani, M. S. Hussein, W. de Paula, and T. Frederico, Cosmological and Particle Physics Con- straints on a New Non-Abelian SU(3) Gauge Model for Ordinary/Dark Matter Interaction, Braz. J. Phys.46, 721 (2016), arXiv:1508.01049 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 041003 (2023), arXiv:2303.14729 [hep-ex]

    2023

  41. [49]

    A. H. Abdelhameedet al.(CRESST), First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D100, 102002 (2019), arXiv:1904.00498 [astro- ph.CO]

    2019

  42. [50]

    Petriccaet al.(CRESST), First results on low-mass dark matter from the CRESST-III experiment, J

    F. Petriccaet al.(CRESST), First results on low-mass dark matter from the CRESST-III experiment, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.1342, 012076 (2020), arXiv:1711.07692 [astro- ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Agneseet al.(SuperCDMS), Search for Low-Mass Dark Matter with CDMSlite Using a Profile Likelihood Fit, Phys

    R. Agneseet al.(SuperCDMS), Search for Low-Mass Dark Matter with CDMSlite Using a Profile Likelihood Fit, Phys. Rev. D99, 062001 (2019), arXiv:1808.09098 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019

  44. [52]

    Agneseet al.(SuperCDMS), Results from the Super Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Experiment at Soudan, Phys

    R. Agneseet al.(SuperCDMS), Results from the Super Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Experiment at Soudan, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 061802 (2018), arXiv:1708.08869 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Agneseet al.(SuperCDMS), Low-mass dark matter search with CDMSlite, Phys

    R. Agneseet al.(SuperCDMS), Low-mass dark matter search with CDMSlite, Phys. Rev. D97, 022002 (2018), arXiv:1707.01632 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Providencia and A

    C. Providencia and A. Rabhi, Interplay between the sym- metry energy and the strangeness content of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C87, 055801 (2013), arXiv:1212.5911 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Tolos, M

    L. Tolos, M. Centelles, and A. Ramos, Equation of State for Nucleonic and Hyperonic Neutron Stars with Mass and Radius Constraints, Astrophys. J.834, 3 (2017), arXiv:1610.00919 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Tolos, M

    L. Tolos, M. Centelles, and A. Ramos, The Equation of State for the Nucleonic and Hyperonic Core of Neu- tron Stars, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.34, e065 (2017), arXiv:1708.08681 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  49. [57]

    C. J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, Neutron star structure and the neutron radius of Pb-208, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5647 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010227

    2001 arXiv

  50. [58]

    G. A. Lalazissis, T. Nikˇ si´ c, D. Vretenar, and P. Ring, New relativistic mean-field interaction with density-dependent meson-nucleon couplings, Phys. Rev. C71, 024312 (2005)

    2005

  51. [59]

    D. P. Menezes, A Neutron Star Is Born, Universe7, 267 (2021), arXiv:2106.09515 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  52. [60]

    Typel and H

    S. Typel and H. H. Wolter, Relativistic mean field calcu- lations with density dependent meson nucleon coupling, Nucl. Phys. A656, 331 (1999)

    1999

  53. [61]

    Fuchs, H

    C. Fuchs, H. Lenske, and H. H. Wolter, Density depen- dent hadron field theory, Phys. Rev. C52, 3043 (1995), arXiv:nucl-th/9507044

    1995 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Sedrakian and A

    A. Sedrakian and A. Harutyunyan, Delta-resonances and hyperons in proto-neutron stars and merger remnants, Eur. Phys. J. A58, 137 (2022), arXiv:2202.12083 [nucl- th]

    2022

  55. [63]

    Hajkarim, J

    F. Hajkarim, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and L. Tolos, Thermody- namic consistent description of compact stars of two inter- acting fluids: the case of neutron stars with Higgs portal dark matter, JCAP2025, 070 (2025), arXiv:2412.04585 [hep-ph]

    2025

  56. [64]

    Glendenning,Compact Stars: Nuclear Physics, Parti- cle Physics and General Relativity, Astronomy and Astro- physics Library (Springer New York, 2012)

    N. Glendenning,Compact Stars: Nuclear Physics, Parti- cle Physics and General Relativity, Astronomy and Astro- physics Library (Springer New York, 2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    N. M. Hugenholtz and L. van Hove, A theorem on the single particle energy in a Fermi gas with interaction, Physica24, 363 (1958)

    1958

  58. [66]

    S. S. Avancini, M. E. Bracco, M. Chiapparini, and D. P. Menezes, On the density dependent hadron field theory at finite temperature and its thermodynamical consistency, J. Phys. G30, 27 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0311019

    2004 arXiv

  59. [67]

    J. M. Lattimer, M. Prakash, C. J. Pethick, and P. Haensel, Direct URCA process in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2701 (1991)

    1991

  60. [68]

    Fortin, C

    M. Fortin, C. Providencia, A. R. Raduta, F. Gulminelli, J. L. Zdunik, P. Haensel, and M. Bejger, Neutron star radii and crusts: uncertainties and unified equations of state, Phys. Rev. C94, 035804 (2016), arXiv:1604.01944 [astro-ph.SR]

    2016 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Klahnet al., Constraints on the high-density nuclear equation of state from the phenomenology of compact stars and heavy-ion collisions, Phys

    T. Klahnet al., Constraints on the high-density nuclear equation of state from the phenomenology of compact stars and heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C74, 035802 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0602038

    2006 arXiv

  62. [70]

    D. Page, J. M. Lattimer, M. Prakash, and A. W. Steiner, Minimal cooling of neutron stars: A New paradigm, Astro- phys. J. Suppl.155, 623 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0403657

    2004 arXiv

  63. [71]

    D. Page, U. Geppert, and F. Weber, The Cooling of compact stars, Nucl. Phys. A777, 497 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0508056

    2006

  64. [72]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese,et al., GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    Doroshenko, V

    V. Doroshenko, V. Suleimanov, G. P¨ uhlhofer, and A. San- tangelo, A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant, Nature Astronomy6, 1444 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann,et al., The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM- Newton Data, Astrophys. J. Lett.918, L28 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray,et al., A nicer view of the massive pulsar psr j0740+6620 informed by radio tim- ing and xmm-newton spectroscopy, Astrophysical Journal Letters918, L27 (2021), arXiv:2105.06979 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [77]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov,et al., A nicer view of psr j0030+0451: Millisecond pulsar parameter estimation, Astrophysical Journal Letters887, L21 (2019), 18 arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Louren¸ co, T

    O. Louren¸ co, T. Frederico, and M. Dutra, Dark matter component in hadronic models with short-range correla- tions, Phys. Rev. D105, 023008 (2022), arXiv:2112.07716 [nucl-th]

    2022

  70. [79]

    Shirke, S

    S. Shirke, S. Ghosh, D. Chatterjee, L. Sagunski, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, R-modes as a new probe of dark matter in neutron stars, JCAP2023, 008 (2023), arXiv:2305.05664 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed July 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.