Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Any binary-choice network game with fully heterogeneous payoffs reduces to three player archetypes while preserving equilibria and best-response paths.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-08 19:26 UTC pith:3HQKB4TS

load-bearing objection Useful three-archetype reduction and dynamics package for heterogeneous binary network games, but the abstract oversells generality relative to the usual threshold-payoff class. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.05932 v1 pith:3HQKB4TS submitted 2026-07-07 econ.TH

Network games with heterogeneous players

Wenjie Cao , Angel Sanchez , Boyu Zhang This is my paper
classification econ.TH MSC 91A4391D30
keywords network gamesheterogeneous playersbinary choiceNash equilibriumbest-response dynamicsplayer archetypeshomophilylimited information
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that binary-choice games played on networks by players with completely different payoff structures can always be rewritten as an equivalent game that uses only three types of player: conformists, who prefer to match their neighbors; rebels, who prefer to differ from them; and stubborn players, whose preferred action does not depend on the network. The rewriting leaves the set of pure-strategy Nash equilibria and the entire trajectory of best-response dynamics unchanged. From the reduced game the authors derive sufficient conditions for pure equilibria to exist and for best-response dynamics to converge on any network, while proving that pure equilibria disappear with probability one in large sparse random networks. They also give a deterministic approximation that forecasts long-run strategy frequencies from the network’s homophily and heterophily statistics alone, without solving for equilibria. When players have only limited information the same reduction yields a unique limited-information equilibrium or a unique stationary distribution, and the predictions are checked on Prisoner's Dilemma games with heterogeneous altruism and peer influence played on real social networks.

Core claim

Any binary-choice network game with arbitrary heterogeneous payoffs can be transformed into an equivalent game whose players belong to only three archetypes—conformist, rebel, and stubborn—so that the pure-strategy Nash equilibria and the best-response trajectories of the original game are exactly preserved.

What carries the argument

The three-archetype payoff transformation: a map that rewrites each player’s payoff so that the player becomes either a pure conformist, a pure rebel, or a stubborn type whose preferred action is independent of neighbors, while leaving the best-reply correspondence and therefore the pure Nash set and best-response paths invariant.

Load-bearing premise

The reduction and all subsequent existence and dynamics results rest on the standard structural form of network-game payoffs—each player’s payoff is additively separable in own action and a monotone function of neighbors’ actions; if payoffs involve non-monotone or higher-order motif interactions the three-type map need not preserve the game.

What would settle it

Exhibit a binary network game whose payoffs are not separable into own-action plus monotone neighbor effects (for example a payoff that rewards a specific three-player motif) and check whether the claimed three-archetype transformation still produces identical pure Nash equilibria and best-response trajectories; failure of the match falsifies the claimed generality of the reduction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Pure-strategy Nash equilibria exist on arbitrary networks whenever the sufficient conditions obtained from the reduced three-type game are met.
  • Best-response dynamics converge on any network under those same conditions.
  • In large sparse random networks pure equilibria vanish with probability approaching one.
  • Long-run strategy frequencies and evolutionary trends can be read off from the network’s homophily and heterophily patterns without computing equilibria.
  • Under limited information the dynamics converge either to a unique limited-information equilibrium or to a unique stationary distribution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The three-archetype classification supplies a low-dimensional typology that empirical network studies could use in place of continuous preference estimation.
  • Almost-sure non-existence of pure equilibria in sparse random graphs implies that observed coordination on large online platforms must rely on mixed strategies, denser local structure, or learning rules other than pure best response.
  • The homophily-based deterministic approximation can be tested as a reduced-form predictor of adoption or opinion cascades without full network simulation.
  • If the reduction truly requires monotone neighborhood effects, games with higher-order interactions would need either a larger archetype set or an entirely different reduction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a framework for binary-choice network games with fully heterogeneous payoffs. Its central claim is that any such game can be transformed into an equivalent game whose players are only three archetypes—conformist, rebel, and stubborn—while preserving the set of pure-strategy Nash equilibria and best-response trajectories. Building on that reduction, the paper supplies sufficient conditions for pure NE existence and BR-dynamics convergence on arbitrary networks, proves almost-sure vanishing of equilibria on large sparse random graphs, constructs a deterministic approximation that predicts strategy frequencies from homophily/heterophily statistics without computing equilibria, and extends the analysis to limited-information settings (convergence to a unique limited-information equilibrium or unique stationary distribution, with necessary and sufficient existence conditions). Predictions are illustrated on Prisoner's Dilemma games played on real social networks with heterogeneous altruism and peer influence.

Significance. If the three-archetype reduction is correctly scoped and the subsequent theorems hold, the paper would supply a genuine unification: existence, dynamics, vanishing, and outcome prediction for heterogeneous binary network games under a single reduction. The deterministic approximation from network assortativity patterns and the limited-information characterization are potentially useful tools for applied work. The empirical check on real networks with heterogeneous altruism is a welcome external validation. These contributions would matter for the network-games literature, which has largely stayed with homogeneous or few-type preferences.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; reduction theorem / §2–3] The load-bearing claim (abstract and opening of the reduction section) that 'any' binary-choice network game with 'fully heterogeneous payoff structures' reduces to a conformist/rebel/stubborn game while preserving pure NE and BR trajectories is not true for arbitrary payoffs u_i(a_i, a_{N_i}):{0,1}×{0,1}^{d_i}→ℝ. Under that unrestricted domain the best response can be an arbitrary Boolean function of the neighbor configuration (parity of two specific neighbors, non-monotone pattern matching, etc.). Conformist/rebel/stubborn archetypes realize only threshold (or constant) maps of a one-dimensional statistic of neighbors' actions. The reduction therefore holds only inside a restricted class—essentially additive/linear or monotone-in-weighted-sum payoffs that induce threshold BR. The manuscript must state an explicit Definition of the maintained payoff class and rewrite every subsequent cl
  2. [Existence / BR-dynamics theorems] Existence and BR-convergence theorems inherit the same scope restriction. If the paper's proofs rely on monotonicity or single-crossing of best responses (standard for threshold games), those arguments do not extend to non-monotone Boolean BR. The statements must either (i) list the precise structural assumptions used in the proofs or (ii) supply counter-examples showing where the claims fail outside the threshold class, so that the reader can see the boundary of the results.
  3. [Vanishing / deterministic approximation sections] The almost-sure vanishing result on large sparse random networks and the deterministic approximation from homophily/heterophily both treat strategy frequencies as driven by local neighbor counts or weighted sums. That structure is again native to threshold BR. Without an explicit error analysis or a statement that the approximation is for the reduced three-archetype game only, the predictive claims over-reach. A short proposition bounding the approximation error (or a clear caveat that the map is exact only after the reduction) is needed.
  4. [Limited-information theorems] The limited-information extension asserts convergence to a unique limited-information equilibrium or unique stationary distribution, plus necessary and sufficient existence conditions. These results again presuppose that each agent's information-contingent BR remains a threshold rule of the three-archetype form. If agents receive only coarse signals, non-monotone payoffs can produce multiple stationary distributions even under the paper's information structure. The necessary-and-sufficient conditions should be restated with the maintained payoff class made explicit, and the uniqueness argument should flag where monotonicity is used.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract's phrasing 'any such game' / 'fully heterogeneous payoff structures' should be aligned with the (to-be-added) formal Definition so that the abstract does not over-claim relative to the body.
  2. [Reduction section] Notation for the three archetypes (conformist / rebel / stubborn) should be introduced with explicit best-response maps (e.g., BR = 1 iff weighted neighbor sum ≥ θ, BR = 1 iff weighted sum ≤ θ, BR constant) so that the reduction map is immediately checkable.
  3. [Empirical section] The empirical Prisoner's Dilemma validation on real networks is useful; a short table or figure reporting predicted versus observed strategy frequencies (and the homophily statistics used) would make the external check easier to evaluate.
  4. [Throughout] Cross-references between the reduction theorem and each later theorem would help the reader track which results are exact consequences of the three-archetype form and which are additional.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

4 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. The central concern—that the three-archetype reduction and all subsequent theorems are correctly scoped only to games whose best responses are threshold rules of a one-dimensional neighbor statistic, not to unrestricted Boolean best responses—is well taken. We agree that the present wording (“any” binary-choice network game with “fully heterogeneous payoff structures”) overstates the domain. In the revision we will introduce an explicit Definition of the maintained payoff class (payoffs linear or monotone in a weighted sum of neighbors’ actions, inducing threshold BR), rewrite the abstract and every theorem statement to reference that class, add a boundary counter-example, supply an approximation-error bound, and flag where monotonicity is used in the limited-information uniqueness arguments. The technical content of the proofs is unchanged; the claims will simply be correctly scoped. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The load-bearing claim (abstract and opening of the reduction section) that 'any' binary-choice network game with 'fully heterogeneous payoff structures' reduces to a conformist/rebel/stubborn game while preserving pure NE and BR trajectories is not true for arbitrary payoffs u_i(a_i,a_{N_i}). Under that unrestricted domain the best response can be an arbitrary Boolean function. Conformist/rebel/stubborn archetypes realize only threshold (or constant) maps of a one-dimensional statistic. The reduction therefore holds only inside a restricted class—essentially additive/linear or monotone-in-weighted-sum payoffs that induce threshold BR. The manuscript must state an explicit Definition of the maintained payoff class and rewrite every subsequent claim.

    Authors: We agree. The reduction we establish applies to binary-action network games in which each player’s payoff difference is a (weakly) monotone function of a weighted sum of neighbors’ actions—equivalently, best responses are threshold rules with respect to that statistic. Within this class (which covers the linear and linear-quadratic specifications standard in the network-games literature, as well as the heterogeneous-altruism Prisoner's Dilemma applications we study), the transformation to conformist, rebel, and stubborn archetypes preserves pure-strategy Nash equilibria and best-response trajectories. Outside this class, best responses can be arbitrary Boolean functions and the reduction fails. In the revision we will: (i) add an explicit Definition of the maintained payoff class at the opening of Section 2; (ii) replace every unqualified “any”/“fully heterogeneous” claim in the abstract, introduction, and theorem statements with a precise reference to that class; (iii) note that the three archetypes exhaust the threshold BR maps obtainable by action-label flips and threshold shifts. These changes correctly scope the contribution without altering the proofs. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Existence and BR-convergence theorems inherit the same scope restriction. If the paper's proofs rely on monotonicity or single-crossing of best responses (standard for threshold games), those arguments do not extend to non-monotone Boolean BR. The statements must either (i) list the precise structural assumptions used in the proofs or (ii) supply counter-examples showing where the claims fail outside the threshold class, so that the reader can see the boundary of the results.

    Authors: We agree that the existence and BR-convergence results rely on the threshold (monotone single-crossing) structure of best responses and do not extend to arbitrary Boolean BR. Our proofs use the fact that, after the reduction, each player’s best response is a threshold rule in the number (or weighted sum) of neighbors choosing action 1; this yields the potential-function or acyclic-improvement arguments that deliver pure NE existence under the stated network/payoff conditions and global convergence of sequential BR dynamics. We will revise the theorem statements to list these structural assumptions explicitly (the maintained payoff class of the new Definition together with the network conditions already stated). We will also add a brief remark, with a simple counter-example (e.g., a two-neighbor XOR best response on a small cycle), indicating that pure NE need not exist and BR dynamics need not converge once one leaves the threshold class. This makes the boundary of the results transparent. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The almost-sure vanishing result on large sparse random networks and the deterministic approximation from homophily/heterophily both treat strategy frequencies as driven by local neighbor counts or weighted sums. That structure is again native to threshold BR. Without an explicit error analysis or a statement that the approximation is for the reduced three-archetype game only, the predictive claims over-reach. A short proposition bounding the approximation error (or a clear caveat that the map is exact only after the reduction) is needed.

    Authors: We agree that both the vanishing result and the deterministic approximation are native to the reduced three-archetype (threshold) game, in which local frequencies and weighted neighbor counts fully determine best responses. In the revision we will: (i) state at the outset of those sections that the results apply to the reduced game (equivalently, to the maintained payoff class); (ii) add a short proposition that bounds the approximation error between the deterministic frequency map and the expected frequencies under the stochastic BR process on finite networks, under standard concentration assumptions on the degree and type distributions; (iii) clarify that the map is exact in the large-population limit after the reduction, and that the homophily/heterophily statistics enter precisely because they determine the local type-weighted neighbor counts that drive threshold BR. These additions will prevent over-reach while preserving the applied usefulness of the approximation for the class of games we study. revision: yes

  4. Referee: The limited-information extension asserts convergence to a unique limited-information equilibrium or unique stationary distribution, plus necessary and sufficient existence conditions. These results again presuppose that each agent's information-contingent BR remains a threshold rule of the three-archetype form. If agents receive only coarse signals, non-monotone payoffs can produce multiple stationary distributions even under the paper's information structure. The necessary-and-sufficient conditions should be restated with the maintained payoff class made explicit, and the uniqueness argument should flag where monotonicity is used.

    Authors: We agree. The limited-information results rely on the same threshold structure: under the maintained payoff class, each agent’s information-contingent best response remains a threshold rule of the three-archetype form, which is what delivers uniqueness of the limited-information equilibrium (or of the stationary distribution of the induced Markov chain) and the necessary-and-sufficient existence conditions we derive. With non-monotone Boolean best responses, multiple stationary distributions can arise even under our information structure. In the revision we will restate the theorems with the maintained payoff class made explicit, and we will flag in the uniqueness proofs the precise steps that use monotonicity/single-crossing of the information-contingent best responses. This will correctly delimit the results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: self-contained theoretical reduction with independent existence/dynamics theorems and external network validation.

full rationale

The paper’s central program is a mathematical reduction: any binary-choice network game in the maintained class is mapped to an equivalent three-archetype (conformist/rebel/stubborn) game that preserves pure-strategy Nash equilibria and best-response trajectories, followed by existence/convergence theorems, a large-network vanishing result, a deterministic approximation from homophily/heterophily, and limited-information extensions. These are standard theorem-proof claims; the three archetypes are not defined so that the main theorems hold by construction, nor are fitted parameters re-labeled as predictions. Validation uses Prisoner's Dilemma games on real social networks with heterogeneous altruism and peer influence—external data, not a re-fit of the theory’s own inputs. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported solely from the authors’ prior work, no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. Scope restrictions on the payoff class (threshold/monotone best responses in neighbor statistics) affect generality/correctness, not circularity of the derivation chain. On the evidence of the abstract and the stated program, the derivation is self-contained; score 0 with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only audit. Free parameters are not visible; the deterministic approximation may introduce effective mixing or type-frequency parameters once the full text is read. Axioms are the standard background of binary network games and best-response dynamics. The three archetypes are reclassifications of payoff types rather than new physical entities; they are listed under invented_entities only as modeling constructs introduced by the paper, with independent_evidence false because their usefulness is internal to the framework until external tests are shown.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Players choose binary actions and best-respond to neighbors' actions under (presumably) additive or monotone network payoffs.
    Standard network-game setup required for the three-archetype reduction and best-response trajectory claims; exact payoff class not stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Pure-strategy Nash equilibrium and asynchronous or sequential best-response dynamics are the solution concepts of interest.
    Existence and convergence results are stated for these objects; mixed equilibria and other learning rules are outside the abstract's scope.
  • domain assumption Large sparse random network model (e.g., ER-like) under which pure equilibria almost surely vanish.
    Load-bearing for the vanishing claim; precise ensemble and sparsity regime not given in the abstract.
  • standard math Standard existence and fixed-point tools of finite game theory and Markov chain convergence for limited-information dynamics.
    Background mathematics expected for the limited-information equilibrium and stationary-distribution results.
invented entities (1)
  • Conformist / rebel / stubborn player archetypes no independent evidence
    purpose: Reduce arbitrary heterogeneous binary payoff structures to three types while preserving equilibria and best-response trajectories.
    Core modeling construct of the paper. They are payoff-type labels rather than new particles or forces; their independent empirical content is the claim that real heterogeneous populations can be usefully partitioned this way, which the abstract supports only by a Prisoner's Dilemma validation sketch.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6284 in / 2846 out tokens · 61506 ms · 2026-07-08T19:26:00.369166+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Real social and economic networks involve individuals with diverse incentives, yet most studies of network games assume homogeneous preferences or few player types. We introduce a general framework for binary choice network games with fully heterogeneous payoff structures. We first show that any such game can be transformed into an equivalent one with conformist, rebel, and stubborn archetypes, preserving equilibria and best response trajectories. We then establish sufficient conditions for pure strategy Nash equilibrium existence and convergence of best response dynamics on arbitrary networks, while proving that equilibria almost surely vanish in large sparse random networks. We further develop a deterministic approximation approach that predicts evolutionary trends and equilibrium strategy frequencies from network homophily and heterophily patterns, without computing equilibria explicitly. Extending the framework to limited information, we prove that dynamics converge either to a unique limited information equilibrium or to a unique stationary distribution, and we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of the limited information equilibrium. We validate our predictions using Prisoner's Dilemma games on real social networks that incorporate heterogeneous altruism and peer influence. These findings together provide a unified framework for equilibrium existence, evolutionary dynamics, and equilibrium outcome prediction in heterogeneous network games.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05932 by Angel Sanchez, Boyu Zhang, Wenjie Cao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Equivalence of the dynamics for the HP game, the threshold game, and the CRS game. (A) In the HP game, each player has a distinct payoff matrix. At each time step, the active player in the snapshots is marked in light gray, and updates their strategy based on the best response dynamics. (B) The HP game can be reformulated as a linear threshold game (with heterogeneous threshold values). Triangles represent… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparisons between trajectories of the HP game (top), its simplified CRS game (middle), and the corresponding ODE (2) (bottom). Horizontal and vertical axis correspond to the 𝑥𝑐 and 𝑥𝑟 , respectively. Purple curves denote the trajectories. Solid points in the bottom row denote the stable fixed points of ODE (2), and red, blue, and yellow regions denote the basins of attraction of the fixed points (0, ∗), … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The influences of information transparency and update mode on the evolutionary outcome. Similarly as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Prisoner’s Dilemma game on networks with preference heterogeneous players. The top panel provide illustrations for PNE in the 3 school networks. Stubborn agents, conformists, and rebels are distributed on the outer ring, middle ring, and inner ring, respectively, and their strategies are marked by red and blue. Coop-Confs and Coop-Stubs represent cooperative conformists (dark color) and stubborn cooperator… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Network games with three types of players

    econ.TH 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    In multi-strategy CRS network games, pure Nash equilibria exist when every conformist has enough conformist or stubborn neighbors and almost surely fail in large random networks with many CR edges.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

154 extracted references · 154 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Network Games , author=. Rev. Econ. Stud. , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Games Econ

    A global game with strategic substitutes and complements , author =. Games Econ. Behav. , volume =

    work page

  3. [3]

    Hoffmann and Tarun Sabarwal , keywords =

    Eric J. Hoffmann and Tarun Sabarwal , keywords =. Global games with strategic complements and substitutes , journal =. 2019 , issn =

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Strategic interaction and networks , author=. Amer. Econ. Rev. , volume=

    work page

  5. [5]

    Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications , volume=

    Games on Networks , author=. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks , year=

    Games Played on Networks , author=. The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks , year=

    work page

  7. [7]

    Nature , volume=

    Social dilemmas among unequals , author=. Nature , volume=

    work page

  8. [8]

    The dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric public goods games , author=. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , volume=

    work page

  9. [9]

    Sampling best response dynamics and deterministic equilibrium selection , author=. Theor. Econ. , volume=

    work page

  10. [10]

    2014 , issn =

    Opinion dynamics in social networks with stubborn agents: Equilibrium and convergence rate , journal =. 2014 , issn =

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Heterogeneous network games: Conflicting preferences , journal =

    Penélope Hernández and Manuel Muñoz-Herrera and Ángel Sánchez , keywords =. Heterogeneous network games: Conflicting preferences , journal =. 2013 , issn =

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Behavioral alignment in social networks , author=. Natl. Sci. Rev. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Dynamics of collective cooperation under personalised strategy updates , author=. Nat. Commun. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Evolution and the Theory of Games , publisher=

    Smith, John Maynard , year=. Evolution and the Theory of Games , publisher=

    work page

  15. [15]

    Evolutionary Game Theory , author=

    work page

  16. [16]

    Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , publisher=

    Hofbauer, Josef and Sigmund, Karl , year=. Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , publisher=

    work page

  17. [17]

    Nature , volume=

    Exploring complex networks , author=. Nature , volume=

    work page

  18. [18]

    Nunes Amaral , title =

    Roger Guimerà and Brian Uzzi and Jarrett Spiro and Luís A. Nunes Amaral , title =. Science , volume =. 2005 , doi =

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    Quantifying social group evolution , journal=

    Palla, Gergely and Barab. Quantifying social group evolution , journal=. 2007 , month=

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    2008 , address=

    Social and economic networks , author=. 2008 , address=

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    2010 , publisher=

    Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world , author=. 2010 , publisher=

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    Nature , volume=

    Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , author=. Nature , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    work page 1992

  23. [23]

    Nature , volume=

    Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games , author=. Nature , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Science , volume=

    Five rules for the evolution of cooperation , author=. Science , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    Nature , volume=

    A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , author=. Nature , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Rand and Martin A

    David G. Rand and Martin A. Nowak and James H. Fowler and Nicholas A. Christakis , title =. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , volume =

    work page

  27. [27]

    Nature , volume=

    Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure , author=. Nature , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Nature , volume=

    Evolution of cooperation in stochastic games , author=. Nature , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Evolution of cooperation on temporal networks , author=. Nat. Commun. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Evolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks , author=. Nat. Hum. Behav. , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Divide and conquer in two-sided markets: A potential-game approach , author=. RAND J. Econ. , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Patterns , volume=

    Coordination of network heterogeneity and individual preferences promotes collective fairness , author=. Patterns , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Diffusion of behavior and equilibrium properties in network games , author=. Amer. Econ. Rev. , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    The dynamics of social innovation , author=. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Science , volume=

    The diffusion of microfinance , author=. Science , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Financial networks and contagion , author=. Amer. Econ. Rev. , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Games Econ

    Potential games , author=. Games Econ. Behav. , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

    work page 1996

  38. [38]

    Journal of Economic theory , volume=

    Potential games with continuous player sets , author=. Journal of Economic theory , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    work page 2001

  39. [39]

    2010 , publisher=

    Population games and evolutionary dynamics , author=. 2010 , publisher=

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    A potential game approach to modelling evolution in a connected society , author=. Nat. Hum. Behav. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    The replicator equation on graphs , author=. J. Theor. Biol. , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , volume=

    Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations , author=. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Multiple strategies in structured populations , author=. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    PLoS computational biology , volume=

    Asymmetric evolutionary games , author=. PLoS computational biology , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Evolutionary dynamics within and among competing groups , author=. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Dynamic Games and Applications , volume=

    Evolutionary stability and the evolution of cooperation on heterogeneous graphs , author=. Dynamic Games and Applications , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Fashion and homophily , author=. Oper. Res. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Dynamic games on arbitrary networks with two types of players , author =. J. Math. Econ. , volume =

    work page

  49. [49]

    Evolutionary dynamics of any multiplayer game on regular graphs , author=. Nat. Commun. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Replicator dynamics on heterogeneous networks , author=. J. Math. Biol. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    PloS one , volume=

    Evolution of cooperation in a heterogeneous graph: Fixation probabilities under weak selection , author=. PloS one , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    Journal of Theoretical Biology , volume=

    Optional games on cycles and complete graphs , author=. Journal of Theoretical Biology , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Evolution of prosocial behaviours in multilayer populations , author=. Nat. Hum. Behav. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Econometrica , pages=

    Learning, mutation, and long run equilibria in games , author=. Econometrica , pages=. 1993 , volume=

    work page 1993

  55. [55]

    Econometrica , pages=

    The evolution of conventions , author=. Econometrica , pages=. 1993 , volume=

    work page 1993

  56. [56]

    Social goods dilemmas in heterogeneous societies , author=. Nat. Hum. Behav. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Opinion fluctuations and disagreement in social networks , author=. Math. Oper. Res. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  58. [58]

    ACM Trans

    Binary opinion dynamics with stubborn agents , author=. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  59. [59]

    Dynamic matching pennies on networks , author=. Int. J. Game Theory , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Nature , volume=

    Information gerrymandering and undemocratic decisions , author=. Nature , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Discrete opinion dynamics in social networks with stubborn agents and limited information , author=. Inf. Fusion , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Theoretical Computer Science , volume=

    The fashion game: Network extension of matching pennies , author=. Theoretical Computer Science , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    Triadic influence as a proxy for compatibility in social relationships , author =. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , volume =

    work page

  64. [64]

    Threshold models of collective behavior , author=. Amer. J. Sociol. , volume=. 1978 , publisher=

    work page 1978

  65. [65]

    Cascading behavior in networks: Algorithmic and economic issues , author=. Alg. Game Theory , volume=

    work page

  66. [66]

    Tempered best response dynamics , author=. Int. J. Game Theory , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Management Science , volume=

    Cournot competition in networked markets , author=. Management Science , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Stochastic approximations with constant step size and differential inclusions , author=. SIAM J. Control Optim. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    Networks of conforming or nonconforming individuals tend to reach satisfactory decisions , author=. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Automatica , volume=

    Characterizing oscillations in heterogeneous populations of coordinators and anticoordinators , author=. Automatica , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    Physics of human cooperation: Experimental evidence and theoretical models , journal =

    S. Physics of human cooperation: Experimental evidence and theoretical models , journal =. 2018 , volume =

    work page 2018

  72. [72]

    Games Econ

    Competing conventions , author =. Games Econ. Behav. , volume =. 2012 , publisher=

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    Bojanowski, Michal and Buskens, Vincent , title =. J. Math. Sociol. , year =

    work page

  74. [74]

    An experimental study of network effects on coordination in asymmetric games , journal =

    Broere, Joris and Buskens, Vincent and Stoof, Henk and S. An experimental study of network effects on coordination in asymmetric games , journal =. 2019 , volume =

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    Economic preferences and cognitive abilities among teenagers in Spain , journal =

    Vasco, M. Economic preferences and cognitive abilities among teenagers in Spain , journal =. 2025 , volume =

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Bibliographic References

    BSI. Bibliographic References. 1976

    work page 1976

  77. [77]

    Citing Publications by Bibliographic References

    BSI. Citing Publications by Bibliographic References. 1978

    work page 1978

  78. [78]

    Citation of unpublished documents

    BSI. Citation of unpublished documents. 1983

    work page 1983

  79. [79]

    Copy-editing

    Judith Butcher. Copy-editing. 1981

    work page 1981

  80. [80]

    The C hicago Manual of Style

    `Chicago'. The C hicago Manual of Style. 1982

    work page 1982

Showing first 80 references.