Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 1 cited by

Effective Field Theories for Material Media

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Collective excitations in solids, fluids and superfluids are the Goldstone modes of broken spacetime symmetries, and their low-energy dynamics follow from a single effective-field-theory construction.

desk verdict Solid, self-contained review that organizes two decades of spacetime-Goldstone EFTs for solids/fluids/superfluids; incremental new thermodynamics and a corrected rate, not a paradigm shift. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06666 v1 pith:DRSXT3R3 submitted 2026-07-07 hep-th cond-mat.otherhep-ph

Angelo Esposito , Alberto Nicolis , Riccardo Penco This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.otherhep-ph
keywords effectivefieldtheoryGoldstonebosonsspontaneoussymmetrybreakingsolidsfluidssuperfluidshydrodynamicsSchwinger–Keldysh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review shows that the mechanical degrees of freedom of ordinary solids, fluids and superfluids can be written as effective field theories for the Goldstone modes that appear when boosts, translations and rotations are spontaneously broken by a finite-density medium. The only ingredients are the unbroken residual symmetries and a derivative expansion; once those are fixed, the entire low-energy action is determined up to a few thermodynamic functions. Phonons, sound waves, vorticity and superfluid phonons then emerge as the same universal objects, with their speeds, interactions and transport coefficients fixed by the same symmetry algebra. The construction also supplies a clean non-relativistic limit and a systematic way to include dissipation through the Schwinger–Keldysh formalism. A reader who works with either high-energy or condensed-matter methods therefore gains a single language in which mechanical deformations, hydrodynamics and superfluidity become special cases of the same Goldstone dynamics.

What carries the argument

The coset/Goldstone effective action for spontaneously broken spacetime symmetries, written in terms of comoving scalar fields (or their Clebsch/Lagrangian duals) whose residual symmetries encode the continuum limit of the medium; a single derivative expansion then generates the entire low-energy dynamics, including the non-relativistic scaling limit and the Schwinger–Keldysh extension that incorporates dissipation.

What would settle it

A controlled lattice calculation or experiment that finds a relevant higher-derivative operator (or a measurable correction to phonon dispersion or scattering) that cannot be absorbed into the continuum Goldstone action and that survives in the infinite-wavelength limit would falsify the claim that continuous residual translations are exact to all orders in the derivative expansion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At long distances the continuum limit of any homogeneous medium is completely described by the Goldstone effective action that realises the spontaneous breaking of Poincaré symmetries (boosts, spatial translations, rotations) together with the appropriate internal shift and diffeomorphism symmetries; all bulk and localised collective excitations, their dispersion relations and their leading interactions are then fixed by that action and its derivative expansion.

Load-bearing premise

The continuum, long-wavelength limit is assumed to restore continuous residual translations even when the microscopic lattice is discrete, so that any operators that would break those continuous translations are non-perturbative and can be dropped to all orders in the derivative expansion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phonon and sound-wave scattering rates, including the classic k^5 decay of superfluid phonons, become universal predictions of a few thermodynamic derivatives of the effective Lagrangian.
  • Viscosity, conductivity and other first-order transport coefficients are fixed by the same Wilson coefficients that appear in the Schwinger–Keldysh effective action, with positivity following from unitarity rather than being imposed by hand.
  • The non-relativistic limit is obtained by a well-defined scaling of the relativistic action, automatically producing Galilean-invariant kinetic terms and the correct mass density without additional assumptions.
  • A symmetry-based classification of media (type-I/II superfluids, supersolids, Galileids, framids) follows directly from which generators remain unbroken, predicting new phases whose Goldstone content can be written down at once.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction should supply a controlled effective theory for electron–phonon or magnon–phonon systems once the additional low-energy fields are coupled to the solid’s comoving coordinates.
  • Because the continuum residual translations are claimed to be exact to all orders in derivatives, any lattice-sensitive correction to long-wavelength phonon physics would have to be non-perturbative in the lattice spacing—an experimentally sharp statement for cold-atom or photonic crystals.
  • The Schwinger–Keldysh formulation already contains the noise that realises the fluctuation–dissipation theorem; the same action can therefore be used as a first-principles generator of stochastic hydrodynamics without extra phenomenological input.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review constructs and unifies effective field theories for the mechanical degrees of freedom of solids, fluids and superfluids from the spontaneous breaking of spacetime symmetries (boosts, translations, rotations) together with appropriate internal symmetries. The solid EFT is built from three comoving scalars φ^I with shift and discrete rotational symmetries, yielding an action F(B^{IJ}) whose thermodynamics and phonon spectrum recover continuum elasticity; fluids are obtained by imposing volume-preserving diffeomorphisms, with several equivalent Eulerian/Lagrangian formulations and a full Schwinger–Keldysh treatment of first-order viscosity; superfluids are described by the classic P(X) action for a U(1) Goldstone, from which phonon decay rates and the non-relativistic limit follow. Non-relativistic limits are systematically obtained as a scaling limit, and a symmetry-based classification of further phases (supersolids, Galileids, framids) is sketched. The central claim is that the low-energy mechanical dynamics of these media are completely captured by the resulting Goldstone actions, with transport coefficients and scattering rates fixed by a controlled derivative expansion.

Significance. If the constructions hold, the paper supplies a single, symmetry-first language that recovers standard continuum elasticity, perfect-fluid hydrodynamics and superfluid phonon physics while making the non-linear realization of Lorentz invariance and the origin of transport coefficients transparent. Explicit strengths include: (i) the thermodynamic identification of the solid and fluid Lagrangians (Secs. 3.3, 4.2); (ii) the complete Schwinger–Keldysh derivation of bulk and shear viscosities together with positivity from unitarity (Sec. 4.6); (iii) the corrected roton–phonon scattering rate and the systematic non-relativistic scaling limit; and (iv) a pedagogical bridge between high-energy and condensed-matter communities. These are genuine computational and conceptual advances for anyone working on Goldstone EFTs of media, holographic duals, or cosmological applications of solids/fluids.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5.3] The manuscript is truncated mid-sentence in Sec. 5.3 (after Eq. (5.52)); the published version should restore the missing text on higher-derivative corrections and the subsequent subsections on finite-temperature superfluids, vortices and rotons.
  2. [Sec. 6] A short table or schematic summarizing the residual unbroken generators for solids, fluids, type-I/II superfluids, supersolids, Galileids and framids would make Sec. 6 more immediately usable.
  3. A few typographical inconsistencies remain (e.g., “almot” for “almost” near Eq. (4.16), occasional missing spaces around citations). A final copy-edit pass would remove them.
  4. [Sec. 2.1] The discussion of inverse-Higgs constraints (Sec. 2.1) could briefly point the reader to the modern literature on counting rules for spacetime Goldstones, even if the coset construction is not used in the body.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: symmetry-based EFT constructions recover standard continuum hydrodynamics/elasticity with free Wilson coefficients; self-citations are to prior technical derivations, not load-bearing uniqueness claims that force the results.

  1. self citation load bearing [§2.1 (Continuous Media) and citation [20]]
    "it can be proved that in the long-distance effective theory there is no difference between discrete translations with microscopic spacing and continuous translations to all orders in the derivative expansion [20]. From the viewpoint of the derivative expansion, the difference is non-perturbative."

    The continuum restoration of unbroken continuous residual translations (needed for the homogeneous solid/fluid EFTs) is justified by a citation that is part of the authors' prior technical line. The claim is standard continuum elasticity/hydrodynamics and is not used to force any numerical prediction or uniqueness of the actions themselves; it is a minor supporting assumption rather than a load-bearing circular step for the central Goldstone constructions.

full rationale

The paper is a pedagogical review that builds Goldstone EFTs for solids (three scalars with internal shifts + G), fluids (volume-preserving diffeos, or 3/4-field Eulerian/Lagrangian equivalents), and superfluids (U(1) phase with finite density) from spacetime + internal symmetries, then expands to phonons, thermodynamics, transport, and scattering. Stress-energy tensors and constitutive relations are derived from the actions (e.g. Tµν from Noether/metric variation) and matched to standard thermo/hydro; Wilson coefficients (sound speeds, gi, viscosities, gn) remain free parameters to be fixed by experiment or UV matching, not fitted to produce the target observables. Positivity of viscosities follows from unitarity of the SK action, not from assuming the second law. Continuum restoration of residual translations is the usual long-wavelength assumption (explicitly noted as non-perturbative in the derivative expansion). Self-citations (e.g. [19,20,91,98]) point to earlier constructions of the same actions; they are not used as external uniqueness theorems that forbid alternatives or smuggle ansatze. No fitted-input-as-prediction, self-definitional loops, or renaming of known empirical patterns as new first-principles results. Minor residual self-citation load is present but not central; score 1 reflects that alone.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard QFT axioms (Lorentz invariance of the UV theory, Goldstone theorem for spontaneously broken continuous symmetries, derivative expansion) plus the domain assumption that the continuum limit restores continuous residual translations. No free parameters are fitted; the Wilson coefficients of the EFTs remain free. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Lorentz (or Galilei) invariance of the microscopic theory is spontaneously broken by the medium’s ground state or density matrix.
    Stated in §1 and used throughout to justify the existence of Goldstone fields.
  • domain assumption In the long-wavelength limit discrete lattice translations become continuous residual translations to all orders in the derivative expansion.
    Invoked in §2.1 and justified by reference to [20]; without it the solid EFT would contain non-perturbative breaking terms.
  • standard math Goldstone theorem and inverse-Higgs constraints for spacetime symmetries.
    Standard results used to count independent fields (§2.1).
  • domain assumption Schwinger–Keldysh doubling plus KMS symmetry correctly encodes dissipation and fluctuation–dissipation relations.
    Adopted in §4.6 as the framework for imperfect fluids.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective Field Theories for Material Media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DRSXT3R3

@misc{pith2026260706666,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective Field Theories for Material Media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DRSXT3R3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06666}
}
read the original abstract

We review recent progress in understanding certain aspects of condensed matter systems from a high energy theory perspective. We discuss effective field theories that describe collective bulk and localized excitations in a variety of solid and fluid systems. Particular emphasis is placed on the role played by spacetime symmetries and their spontaneous breaking. The resulting Goldstone dynamics can be seen as underlying a wide variety of phenomena. We attempt to bridge the language gap between subfields while underscoring the numerous conceptual similarities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06666 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The equilibrium configuration (dashed line) of a string in two spatial dimensions spontaneously breaks three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left panel: Relation between physical and comoving coordinates for a solid at equilibrium, Eq. (3.2). Right panel: Same relation but for a solid slightly away from equilibrium, Eq. (3.34). spacetime symmetries: Lorentz boosts, rotations, and, most importantly, spatial translations. On the other hand, we would like the equilibrium state of our continuous solid to be homogeneous, that is, translationally invariant. Th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Measured spectrum of collective modes in superfluid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p073_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Parametrization of the vortex line configuration, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p079_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Experimental image of a vortex lattice featuring a Tkachenko mode (black lines), as reported in [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p084_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Different phases of superfluid 3He. Red solid arrows represent the atomic spin, S⃗, while blue dashed arrows the atomic orbital angular momentum, L⃗ . Left panel: A-phase. The directions of both S⃗ and L⃗ are fixed. Right panel: B-phase. The relative angle between S⃗ a…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Possible trajectories of rotons under gravitational acceleration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p107_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Isotropic universes with a preferred direction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A tuned vector-field EFT can have an exactly isotropic FLRW background while hiding a preferred direction that reappears in perturbations as direction-dependent propagation and scalar–tensor mixing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

294 extracted references · 294 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge University Press, 2005.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139644167

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644167 2005

  2. [2]

    Zoology of condensed matter: Framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff

    A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza, R. Rattazzi, Zoology of condensed matter: Framids, or- dinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff, JHEP 06 (2015) 155. arXiv:1501.03845, doi:10.1007/ JHEP06(2015)155

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Strocchi, Symmetry Breaking, Vol

    F. Strocchi, Symmetry Breaking, Vol. 9783662621660, Springer, 2021. doi:10.1007/ 978-3-662-62166-0

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    H. J. Maris, Phonon-phonon interactions in liquid helium, Reviews of Modern Physics 49 (2) (1977) 341.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.49.341

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.49.341 1977

  5. [5]

    Morchio, F

    G. Morchio, F. Strocchi, Spontaneous Breaking of the Galilei Group and the Plasmon Energy Gap, Annals Phys. 170 (1986) 310.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(86)90095-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(86)90095-3 1986

  6. [6]

    Ojima, Lorentz Invariance Versus Temperature in QFT, Lett

    I. Ojima, Lorentz Invariance Versus Temperature in QFT, Lett. Math. Phys. 11 (1986) 73. doi:10.1007/BF00417467

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00417467 1986

  7. [7]

    Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking of Lorentz and (Galilei) Boosts in (Relativistic) Many-Body Systems

    M. Requardt, Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking of Lorentz and (Galilei) Boosts in (Relativistic) Many-Body SystemsarXiv:0805.3022

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    Spontaneously broken boosts and the Goldstone continuum

    L. Alberte, A. Nicolis, Spontaneously broken boosts and the Goldstone continuum, JHEP 07 (2020) 076.arXiv:2001.06024,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2020)076

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2020)076 2020

Show all 294 references
  1. [9]

    E. A. Ivanov, V. I. Ogievetsky, The Inverse Higgs Phenomenon in Nonlinear Realizations, Teor. Mat. Fiz. 25 (1975) 164–177.doi:10.1007/BF01028947

    1975 doi

  2. [10]

    I. Low, A. V. Manohar, Spontaneously broken space-time symmetries and Goldstone’s theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 101602. arXiv:hep-th/0110285, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88. 101602

    2002 doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    I. N. McArthur, Nonlinear realizations of symmetries and unphysical Goldstone bosons, JHEP 11 (2010) 140.arXiv:1009.3696,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2010)140

    2010 doi arXiv

  4. [12]

    Nicolis, R

    A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza, R. A. Rosen, More on gapped Goldstones at finite density: More gapped Goldstones, JHEP 11 (2013) 055. arXiv:1306.1240, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2013)055

    2013 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    Watanabe, H

    H. Watanabe, H. Murayama, Redundancies in Nambu-Goldstone Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (18) (2013) 181601.arXiv:1302.4800,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.181601

    2013 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1., Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2239–2247.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.177.2239

    1969 doi

  7. [15]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2., Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2247–2250.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.177.2247

    1969 doi

  8. [16]

    V. I. Ogievetsky, Nonlinear realizations of internal and space-time symmetries, Proceedings of the Xth winter school of theoretical physics in Karpacz 1 (1974) 117

    1974

  9. [17]

    L. V. Delacr´ etaz, S. Endlich, A. Monin, R. Penco, F. Riva, (Re-)Inventing the Relativistic Wheel: Gravity, Cosets, and Spinning Objects, JHEP 11 (2014) 008. arXiv:1405.7384, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2014)008. 120

    2014 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity, Vol. 7 of Course of Theoretical Physics, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, New York, 1986.doi:10.1016/C2009-0-25521-8

    1986 doi

  11. [19]

    Soper, Classical Field Theory, Dover Books on Physics, Dover Publications, 2008

    D. Soper, Classical Field Theory, Dover Books on Physics, Dover Publications, 2008

    2008

  12. [20]

    Esposito, R

    A. Esposito, R. Krichevsky, A. Nicolis, Solidity without inhomogeneity: Perfectly homogeneous, weakly coupled, UV-complete solids, JHEP 11 (2020) 021. arXiv:2004.11386, doi:10.1007/ JHEP11(2020)021

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Part 1, Vol. 5 of Course of Theoretical Physics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1980.doi:10.1016/C2009-0-24487-4

    1980 doi

  14. [22]

    M. I. Aroyo, et al., International tables for crystallography volume a: Space-group symmetry, In- ternational Tables for Crystallography (2016) 193–687 doi:10.1107/97809553602060000001

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    Levine, P

    D. Levine, P. J. Steinhardt, Quasicrystals: a new class of ordered structures, Physical review letters 53 (26) (1984) 2477.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2477

    1984 doi

  16. [24]

    Endlich, A

    S. Endlich, A. Nicolis, J. Wang, Solid Inflation, JCAP 10 (2013) 011. arXiv:1210.0569, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/011

    2013 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    J. Kang, A. Nicolis, Platonic solids back in the sky: Icosahedral inflation, JCAP 03 (2016) 050.arXiv:1509.02942,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/03/050

    2016 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    J. Kang, A. Nicolis, Anisotropic tensor modes from icosahedral inflation. arXiv:1807.03924

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Nicolis, G

    A. Nicolis, G. Sun, Scalar-tensor mixing from icosahedral inflation, JCAP 04 (2021) 074. arXiv:2011.04687,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/074

    2021 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972

    1972

  21. [29]

    Weinberg, Cosmology, Oxford University Press, 2008

    S. Weinberg, Cosmology, Oxford University Press, 2008

    2008

  22. [30]

    Leutwyler, Phonons as goldstone bosons, Helv

    H. Leutwyler, Phonons as goldstone bosons, Helv. Phys. Acta 70 (1997) 275–286. arXiv: hep-ph/9609466

    1997 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kontou, K

    E.-A. Kontou, K. Sanders, Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (19) (2020) 193001. arXiv:2003.01815, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ ab8fcf

    2020 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    Endlich, B

    S. Endlich, B. Horn, A. Nicolis, J. Wang, Squeezed limit of the solid inflation three-point function, Phys. Rev. D 90 (6) (2014) 063506. arXiv:1307.8114, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90. 063506

    2014 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Pavaskar, R

    S. Pavaskar, R. Penco, I. Z. Rothstein, An effective field theory of magneto-elasticity, SciPost Phys. 12 (5) (2022) 155.arXiv:2112.13873,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.5.155

    2022 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    L. D. Landau, J. S. Bell, M. Kearsley, L. Pitaevskii, E. Lifshitz, J. Sykes, Electrodynamics of continuous media, Vol. 8, elsevier, 2013

    2013

  27. [35]

    M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of optics, Cambridge Univ. Pr., 1999. doi:10.1017/ CBO9781139644181. 121

    1999

  28. [36]

    Scheibner, A

    C. Scheibner, A. Souslov, D. Banerjee, P. Sur´ owka, W. T. Irvine, V. Vitelli, Odd elasticity, Nature Physics 16 (4) (2020) 475–480.doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0795-y

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Andreev, I

    A. Andreev, I. Lifshits, Quantum theory of defects in crystals, Zhur Eksper Teoret Fiziki 56 (6) (1969) 2057–2068

    1969

  30. [38]

    Chester, Speculations on bose-einstein condensation and quantum crystals, Physical Review A 2 (1) (1970) 256.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.2.256

    G. Chester, Speculations on bose-einstein condensation and quantum crystals, Physical Review A 2 (1) (1970) 256.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.2.256

    1970 doi

  31. [39]

    superfluid

    A. J. Leggett, Can a solid be “superfluid”?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 (1970) 1543–1546. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.1543

    1970 doi

  32. [40]

    D. T. Son, Effective Lagrangian and topological interactions in supersolids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 175301.arXiv:cond-mat/0501658,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.175301

    2005 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    Brauner, Effective Field Theory for Spontaneously Broken Symmetry, Lect

    T. Brauner, Effective Field Theory for Spontaneously Broken Symmetry, Lect. Notes Phys. 1023 (2024) pp.arXiv:2404.14518,doi:10.1007/978-3-031-48378-3

    2024 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    Levine, P

    D. Levine, P. J. Steinhardt, Quasicrystals. i. definition and structure, Physical Review B 34 (2) (1986) 596.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.34.596

    1986 doi

  35. [43]

    J. E. Socolar, P. J. Steinhardt, Quasicrystals. ii. unit-cell configurations, Physical Review B 34 (2) (1986) 617.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.34.617

    1986 doi

  36. [44]

    Baggioli, M

    M. Baggioli, M. Landry, Effective Field Theory for Quasicrystals and Phasons Dynamics, SciPost Phys. 9 (5) (2020) 062.arXiv:2008.05339,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.5.062

    2020 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    Baggioli, M

    M. Baggioli, M. Landry, A. Zaccone, Deformations, relaxation, and broken symmetries in liquids, solids, and glasses: A unified topological field theory, Phys. Rev. E 105 (2) (2022) 024602.arXiv:2101.05015,doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.105.024602

    2022 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    M. J. Landry, Active actions: Effective field theory for active nematics.arXiv:2309.15142

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Polchinski, Effective field theory and the fermi surface.arXiv:hep-th/9210046

    J. Polchinski, Effective field theory and the fermi surface.arXiv:hep-th/9210046

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Shankar, Renormalization group approach to interacting fermions, Rev

    R. Shankar, Renormalization group approach to interacting fermions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66 (1994) 129–192.arXiv:cond-mat/9307009,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.66.129

    1994 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Reviews of Modern Physics 89 (1) (2017) 015003.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015003

    F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Reviews of Modern Physics 89 (1) (2017) 015003.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015003

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    Li, An effective field theory of damped ferromagnetic systems.arXiv:2312.13093

    J. Li, An effective field theory of damped ferromagnetic systems.arXiv:2312.13093

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Chester, Second sound in solids, Phys

    M. Chester, Second sound in solids, Phys. Rev. 131 (5) (1963) 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 131.2013

    1963 doi

  44. [52]

    Guyer, J

    R. Guyer, J. Krumhansl, Dispersion relation for second sound in solids, Physical Review 133 (5A) (1964) A1411.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.133.A1411

    1964 doi

  45. [53]

    R. N. Gurzhi, Second sound in solids, Sov. Phys. Solid State 7 (12) (1965) 2838–2842

    1965

  46. [54]

    L. P. Pitaevskii, Second sound in solids, Soviet Physics Uspekhi 11 (3) (1968) 342–344

    1968

  47. [55]

    M. J. Landry, Non-equilibrium effective field theory and second sound, JHEP 04 (2021) 213. arXiv:2008.11725,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)213. 122

    2021 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Vallone, Higgs and Goldstone Modes in Crystalline Solids, Phys

    M. Vallone, Higgs and Goldstone Modes in Crystalline Solids, Phys. Status Solidi B 257 (3) (2020) 1900443.arXiv:1908.00918,doi:10.1002/pssb.201900443

    2020 doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    Esposito, E

    A. Esposito, E. Geoffray, T. Melia, Effective field theory for acoustic and pseudoacoustic phonons in solids, Phys. Rev. D 102 (10) (2020) 105009. arXiv:2006.05429, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.102.105009

    2020 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Kleinert, Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter: Vol

    H. Kleinert, Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter: Vol. 1: Superflow and Vortex Lines (Disorder Fields, Phase Transitions) Vol. 2: Stresses and Defects (Differential Geometry, Crystal Melting), World Scientific, 1989

    1989

  51. [59]

    J.-Y. Lin, I. Z. Rothstein, S. Pavaskar, Dispersion relations for dislocation modes and their sensitivity to the lattice structure, Phys. Rev. B 112 (18) (2025) 184316. arXiv:2212.10587, doi:10.1103/56v8-sh8z

    2025 doi arXiv

  52. [60]

    Pretko, L

    M. Pretko, L. Radzihovsky, Fracton-elasticity duality, Physical review letters 120 (19) (2018) 195301.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.195301ExportCitation

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    Pretko, X

    M. Pretko, X. Chen, Y. You, Fracton Phases of Matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (06) (2020) 2030003.arXiv:2001.01722,doi:10.1142/S0217751X20300033

    2020 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    Esposito, R

    A. Esposito, R. Krichevsky, A. Nicolis, Gravitational Mass Carried by Sound Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (8) (2019) 084501.arXiv:1807.08771,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.084501

    2019 doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    Bartolo, D

    N. Bartolo, D. Cannone, A. Ricciardone, G. Tasinato, Distinctive signatures of space-time diffeomorphism breaking in EFT of inflation, JCAP 03 (2016) 044. arXiv:1511.07414, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/03/044

    2016 doi arXiv

  56. [64]

    M´ esz´ aros, Evolution of perturbations in a universe with exotic solid-like matter, Phys

    P. M´ esz´ aros, Evolution of perturbations in a universe with exotic solid-like matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 42 (2023) 101297.arXiv:2302.14480,doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101297

    2023 doi arXiv

  57. [65]

    Bucher, D

    M. Bucher, D. N. Spergel, Is the dark matter a solid?, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 043505. arXiv:astro-ph/9812022,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.043505

    1999 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    P. Cox, T. Melia, S. Rajendran, Dark matter phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. D 100 (5) (2019) 055011.arXiv:1905.05575,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.055011

    2019 doi arXiv

  59. [67]

    Trickle, Z

    T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, K. M. Zurek, K. Inzani, S. M. Griffin, Multi-Channel Direct Detection of Light Dark Matter: Theoretical Framework, JHEP 03 (2020) 036. arXiv:1910.08092, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)036

    2020 doi arXiv

  60. [68]

    Trickle, Z

    T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, K. M. Zurek, Effective field theory of dark matter direct detection with collective excitations, Phys. Rev. D 105 (1) (2022) 015001. arXiv:2009.13534, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.015001

    2022 doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    Mitridate, K

    A. Mitridate, K. Pardo, T. Trickle, K. M. Zurek, Effective field theory for dark matter absorption on single phonons, Phys. Rev. D 109 (1) (2024) 015010. arXiv:2308.06314, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.015010

    2024 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    Esposito, S

    A. Esposito, S. Garcia-Saenz, A. Nicolis, R. Penco, Conformal solids and holography, JHEP 12 (2017) 113.arXiv:1708.09391,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2017)113

    2017 doi arXiv

  63. [71]

    Baggioli, V

    M. Baggioli, V. C. Castillo, O. Pujolas, Scale invariant solids, Phys. Rev. D 101 (8) (2020) 086005.arXiv:1910.05281,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.086005. 123

    2020 doi arXiv

  64. [72]

    Baggioli, V

    M. Baggioli, V. C. Castillo, O. Pujolas, Black Rubber and the Non-linear Elastic Response of Scale Invariant Solids, JHEP 09 (2020) 013. arXiv:2006.10774, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020) 013

    2020 doi arXiv

  65. [74]

    Amoretti, D

    A. Amoretti, D. Are´ an, B. Gout´ eraux, D. Musso, Diffusion and universal relaxation of holographic phonons, JHEP 10 (2019) 068. arXiv:1904.11445, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019) 068

    2019 doi arXiv

  66. [75]

    Baggioli, S

    M. Baggioli, S. Grieninger, Zoology of solid \& fluid holography — Goldstone modes and phase relaxation, JHEP 10 (2019) 235. arXiv:1905.09488, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)235

    2019 doi arXiv

  67. [76]

    Armas, A

    J. Armas, A. Jain, Viscoelastic hydrodynamics and holography, JHEP 01 (2020) 126. arXiv: 1908.01175,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)126

    2020 doi arXiv

  68. [77]

    Amoretti, D

    A. Amoretti, D. Are´ an, B. Gout´ eraux, D. Musso, Gapless and gapped holographic phonons, JHEP 01 (2020) 058.arXiv:1910.11330,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)058

    2020 doi arXiv

  69. [78]

    L.-Z. Xia, L. Xu, W.-J. Li, Collective dynamics in holographic fractonic solids, JHEP 02 (2026) 089.arXiv:2510.17404,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)089

    2026 doi

  70. [79]

    Alberte, M

    L. Alberte, M. Baggioli, V. C. Castillo, O. Pujolas, Elasticity bounds from Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D 100 (6) (2019) 065015, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 102, 069901 (2020)]. arXiv:1807.07474,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.065015

    2019 doi arXiv

  71. [80]

    Musso, Simplest phonons and pseudo-phonons in field theory, Eur

    D. Musso, Simplest phonons and pseudo-phonons in field theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (12) (2019) 986.arXiv:1810.01799,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7498-5

    2019 doi arXiv

  72. [81]

    Musso, D

    D. Musso, D. Naegels, Independent Goldstone modes for translations and shift symmetry from a real modulated scalar, Phys. Rev. D 101 (4) (2020) 045016. arXiv:1907.04069, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.045016

    2020 doi arXiv

  73. [82]

    Brauner, A

    T. Brauner, A. Esposito, R. Penco, Fractional Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (23) (2022) 231601.arXiv:2203.00022,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.231601

    2022 doi arXiv

  74. [83]

    Cheung, M

    C. Cheung, M. Derda, A. Helset, J. Parra-Martinez, Soft phonon theorems, JHEP 08 (2023) 103.arXiv:2301.11363,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)103

    2023 doi arXiv

  75. [84]

    Kovtun, Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories, J

    P. Kovtun, Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories, J. Phys. A45 (2012) 473001.arXiv:1205.5040,doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/47/473001

    2012 doi arXiv

  76. [85]

    S. Jeon, U. Heinz, Introduction to Hydrodynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E24 (10) (2015) 1530010. arXiv:1503.03931,doi:10.1142/S0218301315300106

    2015 doi arXiv

  77. [86]

    Glorioso, M

    P. Glorioso, M. Crossley, H. Liu, Effective field theory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current, JHEP 09 (2017) 096. arXiv:1701.07817, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)096

    2017 doi arXiv

  78. [87]

    Eckart, The Thermodynamics of irreversible processes

    C. Eckart, The Thermodynamics of irreversible processes. 3. Relativistic theory of the simple fluid, Phys. Rev. 58 (1940) 919–924.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.58.919. 124

    1940 doi

  79. [88]

    Landau, E

    L. Landau, E. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, 2nd Edition, Vol. 6 of Course of Theoretical Physics, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1987.doi:10.1016/C2013-0-03799-1

    1987 doi

  80. [89]

    D. T. Son, P. Surowka, Hydrodynamics with Triangle Anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 191601.arXiv:0906.5044,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.191601

    2009 doi arXiv

  81. [90]

    Israel, Thermodynamics of relativistic systems, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 106 (1) (1981) 204–214.doi:10.1016/0378-4371(81)90220-X

    W. Israel, Thermodynamics of relativistic systems, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 106 (1) (1981) 204–214.doi:10.1016/0378-4371(81)90220-X

    1981 doi

  82. [91]

    Dubovsky, T

    S. Dubovsky, T. Gregoire, A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, Null energy condition and superluminal propagation, JHEP 0603 (2006) 025. arXiv:hep-th/0512260, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 2006/03/025

    2006 doi arXiv

  83. [92]

    Endlich, A

    S. Endlich, A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, J. Wang, The Quantum mechanics of perfect fluids, JHEP 04 (2011) 102.arXiv:1011.6396,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)102

    2011 doi arXiv

  84. [93]

    Dersy, A

    A. Dersy, A. Khmelnitsky, R. Rattazzi, The quantum perfect fluid in 2D, SciPost Phys. 17 (1) (2024) 019.arXiv:2211.09820,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.1.019

    2024 doi arXiv

  85. [94]

    Cuomo, F

    G. Cuomo, F. Eustachon, E. Firat, B. Henning, R. Rattazzi, Quantum vorticity: A not so effective field theory, SciPost Phys. 20 (1) (2026) 018. arXiv:2412.10344, doi:10.21468/ SciPostPhys.20.1.018

    2026

  86. [95]

    W. D. Goldberger, P. Tadi´ c, Quantum dynamics of perfect fluids, Phys. Rev. D 113 (12) (2026) 125015.arXiv:2512.23793,doi:10.1103/yxpz-ymfh

    2026 doi arXiv

  87. [96]

    Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 2: Modern applications, Cambridge University Press, 1996.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139644174

    1996 doi

  88. [97]

    S. G. S. O. Endlich, The Effective Field Theory Approach to Fluid Dynamics, Columbia University, 2013.doi:10.7916/D8F76KS3

    2013 doi

  89. [98]

    Dubovsky, L

    S. Dubovsky, L. Hui, A. Nicolis, D. T. Son, Effective field theory for hydrodynamics: thermo- dynamics, and the derivative expansion, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 085029. arXiv:1107.0731, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.085029

    2012 doi arXiv

  90. [99]

    B. Horn, A. Nicolis, R. Penco, Effective string theory for vortex lines in fluids and superfluids, JHEP 10 (2015) 153.arXiv:1507.05635,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)153

    2015 doi arXiv

  91. [100]

    H. Liu, P. Glorioso, Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics, PoS TASI2017 (2018) 008. arXiv:1805.09331, doi:10.22323/1.305.0008

    2018 doi arXiv

  92. [101]

    R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, C. W. Misner, The Dynamics of general relativity, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 1997–2027.arXiv:gr-qc/0405109,doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0661-1

    2008 doi arXiv

  93. [102]

    Landau, E

    L. Landau, E. Lifshitz, Mechanics: Volume 1, Course of theoretical physics, Elsevier Science, 1976

    1976

  94. [103]

    Endlich, A

    S. Endlich, A. Nicolis, The incompressible fluid revisited: vortex-sound interactions. arXiv: 1303.3289

    arXiv

  95. [104]

    Jackiw, V

    R. Jackiw, V. P. Nair, S. Y. Pi, A. P. Polychronakos, Perfect fluid theory and its extensions, J. Phys. A 37 (2004) R327–R432. arXiv:hep-ph/0407101, doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/42/ R01. 125

    2004 doi arXiv

  96. [105]

    Nicolis, Low-energy effective field theory for finite-temperature relativistic superfluids

    A. Nicolis, Low-energy effective field theory for finite-temperature relativistic superfluids. arXiv:1108.2513

    arXiv

  97. [106]

    Schwinger, Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator, Journal of Mathematical Physics 2 (3) (1961) 407–432.doi:10.1063/1.1703727

    J. Schwinger, Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator, Journal of Mathematical Physics 2 (3) (1961) 407–432.doi:10.1063/1.1703727

    1961 doi

  98. [107]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes, Sov. Phys. JETP 20 (4) (1965) 1018–1026

    1965

  99. [108]

    Niemi, G

    A. Niemi, G. Semenoff, Finite Temperature Quantum Field Theory in Minkowski Space, Annals Phys. 152 (1984) 105.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90082-4

    1984 doi

  100. [109]

    Kamenev, Field theory of non-equilibrium systems, Cambridge University Press, 2011

    A. Kamenev, Field theory of non-equilibrium systems, Cambridge University Press, 2011. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139003667

    2011 doi

  101. [110]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, S. Diehl, Keldysh Field Theory for Driven Open Quantum Sys- tems, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (9) (2016) 096001. arXiv:1512.00637, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/ 79/9/096001

    2016 doi arXiv

  102. [111]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, H. A. Rose, Statistical Dynamics of Classical Systems, Phys. Rev. A 8 (1973) 423–437.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.8.423

    1973 doi

  103. [112]

    S. A. Hartnoll, A. P. Mackenzie, Colloquium: Planckian dissipation in metals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (4) (2022) 041002.arXiv:2107.07802,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.041002

    2022 doi arXiv

  104. [113]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, L. G. Yaffe, Effective kinetic theory for high temperature gauge theories, JHEP 01 (2003) 030. arXiv:hep-ph/0209353, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/01/ 030

    2003 doi arXiv

  105. [114]

    Glorioso, H

    P. Glorioso, H. Liu, The second law of thermodynamics from symmetry and unitarity. arXiv: 1612.07705

    arXiv

  106. [115]

    A. Jain, P. Kovtun, Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory for stable and causal relativistic hydrodynamics, JHEP 01 (2024) 162.arXiv:2309.00511,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)162

    2024 doi arXiv

  107. [116]

    Gourgoulhon, An Introduction to relativistic hydrodynamics, EAS Publ

    E. Gourgoulhon, An Introduction to relativistic hydrodynamics, EAS Publ. Ser. 21 (2006) 43–79.arXiv:gr-qc/0603009,doi:10.1051/eas:2006106

    2006 doi arXiv

  108. [117]

    Andersson, G

    N. Andersson, G. L. Comer, Relativistic fluid dynamics: Physics for many different scales, Living Rev. Rel. 10 (2007) 1.arXiv:gr-qc/0605010,doi:10.12942/lrr-2007-1

    2007 doi arXiv

  109. [118]

    J. A. Font, Numerical Hydrodynamics and Magnetohydrodynamics in General Relativity, Living Rev. Rel. 11 (2008) 7.doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-7

    2008 doi

  110. [119]

    Banerjee, S

    N. Banerjee, S. Dutta, Holographic Hydrodynamics: Models and Methods. arXiv:1112.5345

    arXiv

  111. [120]

    Jaiswal, V

    A. Jaiswal, V. Roy, Relativistic hydrodynamics in heavy-ion collisions: general aspects and recent developments, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016 (2016) 9623034. arXiv:1605.08694, doi:10.1155/2016/9623034

    2016 doi arXiv

  112. [121]

    R. F. Santos, A. C. Amaro Faria, L. G. Almeida, Relativistic Hydrodynamics a brief review of classical and quantum fluids in relativistic astrophysics.arXiv:2210.07331. 126

    arXiv

  113. [122]

    Baggioli, B

    M. Baggioli, B. Gout´ eraux, Colloquium: Hydrodynamics and holography of charge density wave phases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 (1) (2023) 011001. arXiv:2203.03298, doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.95.011001

    2023 arXiv

  114. [123]

    Basar, Recent developments in relativistic hydrodynamic fluctuations, Prog

    G. Basar, Recent developments in relativistic hydrodynamic fluctuations, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 143 (2025) 104175.arXiv:2410.02866,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2025.104175

    2025 doi arXiv

  115. [124]

    Banerjee, J

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Jain, S. Minwalla, T. Sharma, Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions, JHEP 09 (2012) 046. arXiv: 1203.3544,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2012)046

    2012 doi arXiv

  116. [125]

    Jensen, M

    K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz, A. Yarom, Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 101601. arXiv:1203.3556, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.101601

    2012 doi arXiv

  117. [126]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam, A. Yarom, Thermodynamics, gravitational anomalies and cones, JHEP 02 (2013) 088.arXiv:1207.5824,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)088

    2013 doi arXiv

  118. [127]

    Grozdanov, D

    S. Grozdanov, D. M. Hofman, N. Iqbal, Generalized global symmetries and dissipative magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 95 (9) (2017) 096003. arXiv:1610.07392, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.95.096003

    2017 arXiv

  119. [128]

    Glorioso, D

    P. Glorioso, D. T. Son, Effective field theory of magnetohydrodynamics from generalized global symmetries.arXiv:1811.04879

    arXiv

  120. [129]

    Armas, A

    J. Armas, A. Jain, One-form superfluids & magnetohydrodynamics, JHEP 01 (2020) 041. arXiv:1811.04913,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)041

    2020 doi arXiv

  121. [130]

    Vardhan, S

    S. Vardhan, S. Grozdanov, S. Leutheusser, H. Liu, Effective field theories of dissipative fluids with one-form symmetries, JHEP 05 (2025) 184. arXiv:2408.12868, doi:10.1007/ JHEP05(2025)184

    2025 arXiv

  122. [131]

    Hernandez, P

    J. Hernandez, P. Kovtun, Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, JHEP 05 (2017) 001. arXiv: 1703.08757,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)001

    2017 doi arXiv

  123. [132]

    Florkowski, B

    W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal, E. Speranza, Relativistic fluid dynamics with spin, Phys. Rev. C 97 (4) (2018) 041901. arXiv:1705.00587, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.041901

    2018 doi arXiv

  124. [133]

    Hattori, M

    K. Hattori, M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Matsuo, H. Taya, Fate of spin polarization in a relativistic fluid: An entropy-current analysis, Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019) 100–106. arXiv: 1901.06615,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.067

    2019 doi arXiv

  125. [134]

    Hongo, X.-G

    M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Kaminski, M. Stephanov, H.-U. Yee, Relativistic spin hydro- dynamics with torsion and linear response theory for spin relaxation, JHEP 11 (2021) 150. arXiv:2107.14231,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)150

    2021 doi arXiv

  126. [135]

    A. D. Gallegos, U. G¨ ursoy, A. Yarom, Hydrodynamics, spin currents and torsion, JHEP 05 (2023) 139.arXiv:2203.05044,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2023)139

    2023 doi arXiv

  127. [136]

    Becattini, I

    F. Becattini, I. Karpenko, M. Lisa, I. Upsal, S. Voloshin, Global hyperon polarization at local thermodynamic equilibrium with vorticity, magnetic field and feed-down, Phys. Rev. C 95 (5) (2017) 054902.arXiv:1610.02506,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054902. 127

    2017 doi arXiv

  128. [137]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, T. Niida, S. Pu, A.-H. Tang, Q. Wang, Spin polarization in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33 (06) (2024) 2430006. arXiv:2402. 04540,doi:10.1142/S0218301324300066

    2024 doi

  129. [138]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, T. Yoshimura, Emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. X 6 (4) (2016) 041065. arXiv:1605.07331, doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041065

    2016 doi arXiv

  130. [139]

    Bertini, M

    B. Bertini, M. Collura, J. De Nardis, M. Fagotti, Transport in Out-of-Equilibrium XXZ Chains: Exact Profiles of Charges and Currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (20) (2016) 207201. arXiv:1605.09790,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.207201

    2016 doi arXiv

  131. [140]

    De Nardis, D

    J. De Nardis, D. Bernard, B. Doyon, Hydrodynamic Diffusion in Integrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (16) (2018) 160603.arXiv:1807.02414,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.160603

    2018 doi arXiv

  132. [141]

    Doyon, Lecture notes on Generalised Hydrodynamics, SciPost Phys

    B. Doyon, Lecture notes on Generalised Hydrodynamics, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 18 (2020) 1.arXiv:1912.08496,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.18

    2020 doi arXiv

  133. [142]

    Jackiw, V

    R. Jackiw, V. P. Nair, S. Y. Pi, Chern-Simons reduction and nonAbelian fluid mechanics, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 085018.arXiv:hep-th/0004084,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.085018

    2000 doi arXiv

  134. [143]

    Bistrovic, R

    B. Bistrovic, R. Jackiw, H. Li, V. P. Nair, S. Y. Pi, NonAbelian fluid dynamics in Lagrangian formulation, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 025013. arXiv:hep-th/0210143, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.025013

    2003 doi arXiv

  135. [144]

    R. Jackiw, Lectures on Fluid Dynamics: A Particle Theorist’s View of Supersymmetric, Non-Abelian, Noncommutative Fluid Mechanics and d-Branes, CRM Series in Mathematical Physics, Springer, New York, 2002.doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3665-6

    2002 doi

  136. [145]

    V. P. Nair, R. Ray, S. Roy, Fluids, Anomalies and the Chiral Magnetic Effect: A Group- theoretic Formulation, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 025012. arXiv:1112.4022, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.86.025012

    2012 arXiv

  137. [146]

    Crossley, P

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, H. Liu, Effective field theory of dissipative fluids, JHEP 09 (2017) 095.arXiv:1511.03646,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)095

    2017 doi arXiv

  138. [147]

    P. Gao, P. Glorioso, H. Liu, Ghostbusters: Unitarity and Causality of Non-equilibrium Effective Field Theories, JHEP 03 (2020) 040.arXiv:1803.10778,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)040

    2020 doi arXiv

  139. [148]

    L. V. Delacretaz, Boulder Lectures on Thermal Dynamics and Hydrodynamic EFTs, 2026. arXiv:2606.02391

    2026 arXiv

  140. [149]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, Adiabatic hydrodynamics: The eightfold way to dissipation, JHEP 05 (2015) 060.arXiv:1502.00636,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2015)060

    2015 doi arXiv

  141. [150]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, The Fluid Manifesto: Emergent symmetries, hydrodynamics, and black holes, JHEP 01 (2016) 184. arXiv:1510.02494, doi:10.1007/ JHEP01(2016)184

    2016 arXiv

  142. [151]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, Topological sigma models & dissipative hydrodynamics, JHEP 04 (2016) 039.arXiv:1511.07809,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)039. 128

    2016 doi arXiv

  143. [152]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. Part I: BRST symmetries and superspace, JHEP 06 (2017) 069. arXiv:1610.01940, doi:10.1007/ JHEP06(2017)069

    2017 arXiv

  144. [153]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. Part II: thermal equivariant cohomology, JHEP 06 (2017) 070. arXiv:1610.01941, doi:10.1007/ JHEP06(2017)070

    2017 arXiv

  145. [154]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, Effective Action for Relativistic Hydrodynamics: Fluctuations, Dissipation, and Entropy Inflow, JHEP 10 (2018) 194. arXiv:1803.11155, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)194

    2018 doi arXiv

  146. [155]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, Two roads to hydrodynamic effective actions: a comparison.arXiv:1701.07896

    arXiv

  147. [156]

    Jensen, N

    K. Jensen, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, A. Yarom, Dissipative hydrodynamics in superspace, JHEP 09 (2018) 127.arXiv:1701.07436,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2018)127

    2018 doi arXiv

  148. [157]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Marjieh, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, A. Yarom, An entropy current in superspace, JHEP 01 (2019) 061.arXiv:1803.07070,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)061

    2019 doi arXiv

  149. [159]

    de Boer, M

    J. de Boer, M. P. Heller, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theories, JHEP 05 (2019) 188.arXiv:1812.06093,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)188

    2019 doi arXiv

  150. [160]

    C. O. Akyuz, G. Goon, R. Penco, The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction, JHEP 06 (2024) 004.arXiv:2306.17232,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)004

    2024 doi arXiv

  151. [161]

    Firat, A

    E. Firat, A. Gomes, F. Nardi, R. Penco, R. Rattazzi, Schwinger-Keldysh effective theory of charge transport: redundancies and systematic ω/T expansion, JHEP 05 (2026) 079. arXiv:2508.18346,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2026)079

    2026 doi arXiv

  152. [162]

    Gozzi, M

    E. Gozzi, M. Reuter, W. D. Thacker, Hidden BRS Invariance in Classical Mechanics. 2, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 3363.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.40.3363

    1989 doi

  153. [163]

    C. R. Galley, Classical Mechanics of Nonconservative Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (17) (2013) 174301.arXiv:1210.2745,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.174301

    2013 doi arXiv

  154. [164]

    Besharat, J

    A. Besharat, J. Radkovski, S. Sibiryakov, Effective action for dissipative and nonholonomic systems, Phys. Rev. E 109 (5) (2024) L052103. arXiv:2308.08695, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE. 109.L052103

    2024 doi arXiv

  155. [165]

    Policastro, D

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son, A. O. Starinets, The Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 081601. arXiv:hep-th/ 0104066,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.081601

    2001 doi

  156. [166]

    Kovtun, D

    P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, A. O. Starinets, Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 111601. arXiv:hep-th/0405231, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.111601. 129

    2005 doi arXiv

  157. [167]

    Bhattacharyya, V

    S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, M. Rangamani, Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity, JHEP 02 (2008) 045.arXiv:0712.2456,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/045

    2008 doi arXiv

  158. [168]

    Rangamani, Gravity and Hydrodynamics: Lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence, Class

    M. Rangamani, Gravity and Hydrodynamics: Lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224003.arXiv:0905.4352,doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/22/ 224003

    2009 doi arXiv

  159. [169]

    Jensen, M

    K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz, A. Yarom, Parity-Violating Hy- drodynamics in 2+1 Dimensions, JHEP 05 (2012) 102. arXiv:1112.4498, doi:10.1007/ JHEP05(2012)102

    2012 arXiv

  160. [170]

    Ballesteros, B

    G. Ballesteros, B. Bellazzini, Effective perfect fluids in cosmology, JCAP 04 (2013) 001. arXiv:1210.1561,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/04/001

    2013 doi arXiv

  161. [171]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore, M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid, JCAP 07 (2012) 051. arXiv:1004.2488, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/ 051

    2012 doi arXiv

  162. [172]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg, L. Senatore, The Effective Field Theory of Cosmological Large Scale Structures, JHEP 09 (2012) 082. arXiv:1206.2926, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2012) 082

    2012 doi arXiv

  163. [173]

    Pajer, M

    E. Pajer, M. Zaldarriaga, On the Renormalization of the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures, JCAP 08 (2013) 037. arXiv:1301.7182, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/037

    2013 doi arXiv

  164. [176]

    Senatore, M

    L. Senatore, M. Zaldarriaga, The IR-resummed Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures, JCAP 02 (2015) 013.arXiv:1404.5954,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/013

    2015 doi arXiv

  165. [177]

    Cabass, M

    G. Cabass, M. M. Ivanov, M. Lewandowski, M. Mirbabayi, M. Simonovi´ c, Snowmass White Paper: Effective Field Theories in Cosmology, Phys. Dark Univ. 40 (2023) 101193. arXiv: 2203.08232,doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101193

    2023 doi arXiv

  166. [178]

    M. M. Ivanov, Effective Field Theory for Large Scale Structure, arXiv:2212.08488, doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-3079-9_5-1

    doi arXiv

  167. [179]

    M. P. Heller, R. A. Janik, P. Witaszczyk, Hydrodynamic Gradient Expansion in Gauge Theory Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (21) (2013) 211602. arXiv:1302.0697, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.110.211602

    2013 arXiv

  168. [180]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson, B. Withers, Hydrodynamic Gradient Expansion Diverges beyond Bjorken Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (12) (2022) 122302. arXiv: 2110.07621,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.122302

    2022 doi arXiv

  169. [181]

    M. P. Heller, M. Spalinski, Hydrodynamics Beyond the Gradient Expansion: Resurgence and Resummation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (7) (2015) 072501. arXiv:1503.07514, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.115.072501. 130

    2015 arXiv

  170. [182]

    Buchel, M

    A. Buchel, M. P. Heller, J. Noronha, Entropy Production, Hydrodynamics, and Resurgence in the Primordial Quark-Gluon Plasma from Holography, Phys. Rev. D 94 (10) (2016) 106011. arXiv:1603.05344,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.106011

    2016 doi arXiv

  171. [183]

    Florkowski, M

    W. Florkowski, M. P. Heller, M. Spalinski, New theories of relativistic hydrodynamics in the LHC era, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81 (4) (2018) 046001. arXiv:1707.02282, doi:10.1088/ 1361-6633/aaa091

    2018 arXiv

  172. [184]

    Jankowski, M

    J. Jankowski, M. Spali´ nski, Hydrodynamic attractors in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 132 (2023) 104048. arXiv:2303.09414, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023. 104048

    2023 doi arXiv

  173. [185]

    Grozdanov, P

    S. Grozdanov, P. K. Kovtun, A. O. Starinets, P. Tadi´ c, The complex life of hydrodynamic modes, JHEP 11 (2019) 097.arXiv:1904.12862,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)097

    2019 doi arXiv

  174. [186]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson, B. Withers, Hydrodynamic gradient expansion in linear response theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (6) (2021) 066002. arXiv:2007.05524, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.066002

    2021 doi arXiv

  175. [187]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, B. Withers, Rigorous Bounds on Transport from Causality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (26) (2023) 261601. arXiv:2212.07434, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.130.261601

    2023 arXiv

  176. [188]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, B. Withers, The Hydrohedron: Bootstrapping Relativistic Hydrodynamics, Nature Phys. 20 (2024) 1948–1953. arXiv:2305.07703, doi: 10.1038/s41567-024-02635-5

    2024 doi arXiv

  177. [189]

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, J. Noronha, Causality and existence of solutions of relativistic viscous fluid dynamics with gravity, Phys. Rev. D 98 (10) (2018) 104064. arXiv:1708.06255, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.104064

    2018 doi arXiv

  178. [190]

    Kovtun, First-order relativistic hydrodynamics is stable, JHEP 10 (2019) 034

    P. Kovtun, First-order relativistic hydrodynamics is stable, JHEP 10 (2019) 034. arXiv: 1907.08191,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)034

    2019 doi arXiv

  179. [191]

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, J. Noronha, Nonlinear Causality of General First-Order Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 100 (10) (2019) 104020, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 105, 069902 (2022)].arXiv:1907.12695,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104020

    2019 doi arXiv

  180. [192]

    R. E. Hoult, P. Kovtun, Stable and causal relativistic Navier-Stokes equations, JHEP 06 (2020) 067.arXiv:2004.04102,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)067

    2020 doi arXiv

  181. [193]

    R. E. Hoult, P. Kovtun, Causal first-order hydrodynamics from kinetic theory and hologra- phy, Phys. Rev. D 106 (6) (2022) 066023.arXiv:2112.14042,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106. 066023

    2022 doi arXiv

  182. [194]

    F. M. Haehl, M. Rangamani, Records from the S-Matrix Marathon: Schwinger-Keldysh Formalism.arXiv:2410.10602

    arXiv

  183. [195]

    Landau, E

    L. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, L. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics, Part 2, Vol. 9 of Course of Theoretical Physics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1980. doi:10.1016/C2009-0-24308-X

    1980 doi

  184. [196]

    Pethick, H

    C. Pethick, H. Smith, Bose-Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases, Cambridge University Press, 2002.doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802850. 131

    2002 doi

  185. [197]

    D. E. Oates, J. G. King, Measurement of helium-helium scattering cross section at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 (1971) 735–737.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.735

    1971 doi

  186. [198]

    Abraham, Y

    B. Abraham, Y. Eckstein, J. Ketterson, M. Kuchnir, P. R. Roach, Velocity of sound, density, and gr¨ uneisen constant in liquidHe 4, Physical Review A 1 (2) (1970) 250. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.1.250

    1970

  187. [199]

    Greiter, F

    M. Greiter, F. Wilczek, E. Witten, Hydrodynamic Relations in Superconductivity, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 3 (1989) 903.doi:10.1142/S0217984989001400

    1989 doi

  188. [200]

    D. T. Son, Low-energy quantum effective action for relativistic superfluids. arXiv:hep-ph/ 0204199

  189. [201]

    D. T. Son, M. Wingate, General coordinate invariance and conformal invariance in nonrelativis- tic physics: Unitary Fermi gas, Annals Phys. 321 (2006) 197–224. arXiv:cond-mat/0509786, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.11.001

    2006 doi arXiv

  190. [202]

    M. A. Escobedo, C. Manuel, Effective field theory and dispersion law of the phonons of a non-relativistic superfluid, Phys. Rev. A 82 (2010) 023614. arXiv:1004.2567, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.82.023614

    2010 arXiv

  191. [203]

    Nicolis, F

    A. Nicolis, F. Piazza, Spontaneous Symmetry Probing, JHEP 1206 (2012) 025. arXiv: 1112.5174,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2012)025

    2012 doi arXiv

  192. [204]

    Nicolis, R

    A. Nicolis, R. Penco, R. A. Rosen, Relativistic Fluids, Superfluids, Solids and Supersolids from a Coset Construction, Phys. Rev. D 89 (4) (2014) 045002. arXiv:1307.0517, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.045002

    2014 doi arXiv

  193. [205]

    Berezhiani, J

    L. Berezhiani, J. Khoury, Emergent long-range interactions in Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. D 99 (7) (2019) 076003. arXiv:1812.09332, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.076003

    2019 doi arXiv

  194. [206]

    Nicolis, A

    A. Nicolis, A. Podo, L. Santoni, The connection between nonzero density and spontaneous symmetry breaking for interacting scalars, JHEP 09 (2023) 200. arXiv:2305.08896, doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2023)200

    2023 doi arXiv

  195. [207]

    I. Z. Rothstein, TASI lectures on effective field theories, 2003.arXiv:hep-ph/0308266

    2003 arXiv

  196. [208]

    D. B. Kaplan, Five lectures on effective field theory, 2005.arXiv:nucl-th/0510023

    2005 arXiv

  197. [209]

    A. V. Manohar, Introduction to Effective Field Theories. arXiv:1804.05863, doi:10.1093/ oso/9780198855743.003.0002

    arXiv

  198. [210]

    Penco, An Introduction to Effective Field Theories.arXiv:2006.16285

    R. Penco, An Introduction to Effective Field Theories.arXiv:2006.16285

    2006 arXiv

  199. [211]

    Caputo, A

    A. Caputo, A. Esposito, E. Geoffray, A. D. Polosa, S. Sun, Dark Matter, Dark Photon and Superfluid He-4 from Effective Field Theory, Phys. Lett. B 802 (2020) 135258. arXiv: 1911.04511,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135258

    2020 doi arXiv

  200. [212]

    Donoghue, E

    J. Donoghue, E. Golowich, B. Holstein, Dynamics of the Standard Model, Cambridge Mono- graphs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, 1994.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803512. 132

    1994 doi

  201. [213]

    J. I. Kapusta, C. Gale, Finite-temperature field theory: Principles and applications, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2011. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511535130

    2011

  202. [214]

    J. I. Kapusta, Bose-Einstein Condensation, Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, and Gauge Theories, Phys.Rev. D24 (1981) 426–439.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.24.426

    1981 doi

  203. [215]

    Burgess, Introduction to Effective Field Theory, Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci

    C. Burgess, Introduction to Effective Field Theory, Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci. 57 (2007) 329–362. arXiv:hep-th/0701053,doi:10.1017/9781139048040

    2007 doi arXiv

  204. [216]

    Babichev, S

    E. Babichev, S. Ramazanov, A. Vikman, Recovering P (X) from a canonical complex field, JCAP 11 (2018) 023.arXiv:1807.10281,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/11/023

    2018 doi arXiv

  205. [217]

    Creminelli, G

    P. Creminelli, G. Tambalo, F. Vernizzi, V. Yingcharoenrat, Dark-Energy Instabilities induced by Gravitational Waves, JCAP 05 (2020) 002. arXiv:1910.14035, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2020/05/002

    2020 doi arXiv

  206. [218]

    Joyce, A

    A. Joyce, A. Nicolis, A. Podo, L. Santoni, Integrating out beyond tree level and relativistic superfluids, JHEP 09 (2022) 066.arXiv:2204.03678,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)066

    2022 doi arXiv

  207. [219]

    A. J. Leggett, Quantum Liquids: Bose condensation and Cooper pairing in condensed-matter systems, Oxford University Press, 2006. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198526438.001. 0001

    2006 doi

  208. [220]

    J. O. Andersen, Theory of the weakly interacting Bose gas, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 (2004) 599. arXiv:cond-mat/0305138,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.599

    2004 doi arXiv

  209. [221]

    R. L. Workman, et al., Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01. doi:10.1093/ ptep/ptac097

    2022

  210. [222]

    Caupin, J

    F. Caupin, J. Boronat, K. H. Andersen, Static structure factor and static response function of superfluid helium 4: a comparative analysis, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 152 (2008) 108–121.doi:10.1007/s10909-008-9809-3

    2008 doi

  211. [223]

    Campbell, E

    C. Campbell, E. Krotscheck, T. Lichtenegger, Dynamic many-body theory: Multiparticle fluctuations and the dynamic structure of He 4, Physical Review B 91 (18) (2015) 184510. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.184510

    2015 doi

  212. [224]

    Cowley, A

    R. Cowley, A. Woods, Inelastic scattering of thermal neutrons from liquid helium, Canadian Journal of Physics 49 (2) (1971) 177–200.doi:doi.org/10.1139/p71-021

    1971 doi

  213. [225]

    Gibbs, K

    M. Gibbs, K. Andersen, W. Stirling, H. Schober, The collective excitations of normal and superfluid: the dependence on pressure and temperature, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 11 (3) (1999) 603.doi:10.1088/0953-8984/11/3/003

    1999 doi

  214. [226]

    Keller, K

    T. Keller, K. Habicht, R. Golub, F. Mezei, Roton and phonon linewidths in superfluid 4He, Europhysics Letters 67 (5) (2004) 773.doi:10.1209/epl/i2004-10125-6

    2004 doi

  215. [227]

    H. R. Glyde, M. R. Gibbs, W. G. Stirling, M. A. Adams, Excitations in superfluid 4He beyond the roton, Europhysics Letters 43 (4) (1998) 422.doi:10.1209/epl/i1998-00375-2

    1998 doi

  216. [228]

    Landau, Theory of the Superfluidity of Helium II, Phys

    L. Landau, Theory of the Superfluidity of Helium II, Phys. Rev. 60 (4) (1941) 356. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.60.356. 133

    1941 doi

  217. [229]

    Nicolis, R

    A. Nicolis, R. Penco, Mutual Interactions of Phonons, Rotons, and Gravity, Phys. Rev. B 97 (13) (2018) 134516.arXiv:1705.08914,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.134516

    2018 doi arXiv

  218. [230]

    I. M. Khalatnikov, An introduction to the theory of superfluidity, CRC press, 2018. doi: 10.1201/9780429502897

    2018 doi

  219. [231]

    Ballesteros, D

    G. Ballesteros, D. Comelli, L. Pilo, Thermodynamics of perfect fluids from scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2) (2016) 025034. arXiv:1605.05304, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.025034

    2016 doi arXiv

  220. [232]

    Carter, D

    B. Carter, D. Langlois, The Equation of state for cool relativistic two constituent su- perfluid dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 5855–5864. arXiv:hep-th/9507058, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.5855

    1995 doi arXiv

  221. [233]

    Kourkoulou, A

    I. Kourkoulou, A. Nicolis, K. Parmentier, Low-temperature thermal corrections to a superfluid’s equation of state.arXiv:2212.12555

    arXiv

  222. [234]

    Becattini, G

    F. Becattini, G. Inghirami, V. Rolando, A. Beraudo, L. Del Zanna, A. De Pace, M. Nardi, G. Pagliara, V. Chandra, A study of vorticity formation in high energy nuclear collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (9) (2015) 406, [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 78, 354 (2018)]. arXiv:1501.04468, doi:1...

    2015 doi arXiv

  223. [235]

    H. E. Hall, W. F. Vinen, The rotation of liquid helium ii i. experiments on the propagation of second sound in uniformly rotating helium ii, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 238 (1213) (1956) 204–214. doi:10.1098/rspa. 1956.0214

    1956 doi

  224. [236]

    W. F. Vinen, The detection of single quanta of circulation in liquid helium ii, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 260 (1301) (1961) 218–236.doi:10.1098/rspa.1961.0029

    1961 doi

  225. [237]

    G. A. Williams, R. E. Packard, Photographs of quantized vortex lines in rotating he ii, Physical Review Letters 33 (5) (1974) 280.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.280

    1974 doi

  226. [238]

    M. R. Matthews, B. P. Anderson, P. Haljan, D. Hall, C. Wieman, E. A. Cornell, Vortices in a bose-einstein condensate, Physical Review Letters 83 (13) (1999) 2498. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.83.2498

    1999

  227. [239]

    B. P. Anderson, P. Haljan, C. E. Wieman, E. A. Cornell, Vortex precession in bose-einstein condensates: Observations with filled and empty cores, Physical Review Letters 85 (14) (2000) 2857.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2857

    2000 doi

  228. [240]

    M. J. Ku, W. Ji, B. Mukherjee, E. Guardado-Sanchez, L. W. Cheuk, T. Yefsah, M. W. Zwierlein, Motion of a solitonic vortex in the bec-bcs crossover, Physical review letters 113 (6) (2014) 065301.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.065301

    2014 doi

  229. [241]

    E. B. Sonin, Vortex oscillations and hydrodynamics of rotating superfluids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59 (1987) 87–155.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.59.87

    1987 doi

  230. [242]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 (2008) 885–964.arXiv:0704.3011,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885

    2008 doi arXiv

  231. [243]

    A. L. Fetter, Rotating trapped bose-einstein condensates, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 647–691. arXiv:0801.2952,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.647. 134

    2009 doi arXiv

  232. [244]

    Sonin, Tkachenko waves, JETP letters 98 (2014) 758–768

    E. Sonin, Tkachenko waves, JETP letters 98 (2014) 758–768. arXiv:1311.1781, doi:10. 1134/S0021364013240181

    2014 arXiv

  233. [245]

    Carter, I

    B. Carter, I. Khalatnikov, Momentum, vorticity, and helicity in covariant superfluid dynamics, Annals of Physics 219 (2) (1992) 243–265.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(92)90348-P

    1992 doi

  234. [246]

    Hatsuda, S

    M. Hatsuda, S. Yahikozawa, P. Ao, D. J. Thouless, Topological landau-ginzburg theory for vortices in superfluid he 4, Physical Review B 49 (22) (1994) 15870. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB. 49.15870

    1994 doi

  235. [247]

    Hatsuda, M

    M. Hatsuda, M. Sato, S. Yahikozawa, T. Hatsuda, Magnus force and effective vortex mass in neutral and charged superfluids, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10 (1996) 1875–1894. arXiv: cond-mat/9505158,doi:10.1142/S0217979296000854

    1996 doi arXiv

  236. [248]

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, I. Z. Rothstein, Finite size corrections to the radiation reaction force in classical electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 094802. arXiv:1005.2617, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.094802

    2010 doi arXiv

  237. [249]

    A. V. Manohar, M. B. Wise, Heavy quark physics, Vol. 10, Cambridge University Press, 2000. doi:10.1017/9781009402125

    2000 doi

  238. [250]

    Lund, Defect dynamics for the nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation derived from a variational principle, Physics Letters A 159 (4-5) (1991) 245–251

    F. Lund, Defect dynamics for the nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation derived from a variational principle, Physics Letters A 159 (4-5) (1991) 245–251. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(91)90518-D

    1991 doi

  239. [252]

    S. S. Gubser, R. Nayar, S. Parikh, Strings, vortex rings, and modes of instability, Nucl. Phys. B 892 (2015) 156–180.arXiv:1408.2246,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.01.005

    2015 doi arXiv

  240. [253]

    F. Lund, T. Regge, Unified Approach to Strings and Vortices with Soliton Solutions, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 1524.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.1524

    1976 doi

  241. [254]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2007. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511816079

    2007

  242. [255]

    Cremmer, J

    E. Cremmer, J. Scherk, Spontaneous dynamical breaking of gauge symmetry in dual models, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 117–124.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90224-7

    1974 doi

  243. [256]

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. Odintsov, L. Shapiro, Effective action in quantum gravity, CRC Press, 1992.doi:10.1201/9780203758922

    1992 doi

  244. [257]

    Zee, Vortex strings and the antisymmetric gauge potential, Nucl.Phys

    A. Zee, Vortex strings and the antisymmetric gauge potential, Nucl.Phys. B421 (1994) 111–124. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90226-7

    1994 doi

  245. [258]

    J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, W. Ketterle, Observation of vortex lattices in bose- einstein condensates, Science 292 (5516) (2001) 476–479.doi:10.1126/science.1060182

    2001 doi

  246. [259]

    Tkachenko, On vortex lattices, Sov

    V. Tkachenko, On vortex lattices, Sov. Phys. JETP 22 (6) (1966) 1282–1286

    1966

  247. [260]

    Tkachenko, Stability of vortex lattices, Sov

    V. Tkachenko, Stability of vortex lattices, Sov. Phys. JETP 23 (6) (1966) 1049–1056. 135

    1966

  248. [261]

    Baym, Tkachenko modes of vortex lattices in rapidly rotating bose-einstein condensates, Physical review letters 91 (11) (2003) 110402.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.110402

    G. Baym, Tkachenko modes of vortex lattices in rapidly rotating bose-einstein condensates, Physical review letters 91 (11) (2003) 110402.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.110402

    2003 doi

  249. [262]

    Coddington, P

    I. Coddington, P. Engels, V. Schweikhard, E. A. Cornell, Observation of tkachenko oscillations in rapidly rotating bose-einstein condensates, Physical review letters 91 (10) (2003) 100402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.100402

    2003 doi

  250. [263]

    Moroz, C

    S. Moroz, C. Hoyos, C. Benzoni, D. T. Son, Effective field theory of a vortex lattice in a bosonic superfluid, SciPost Phys. 5 (4) (2018) 039. arXiv:1803.10934, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys. 5.4.039

    2018 doi arXiv

  251. [264]

    Y.-H. Du, S. Moroz, D. X. Nguyen, D. T. Son, Noncommutative field theory of the Tkachenko mode: Symmetries and decay rate, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (1) (2024) L012040. arXiv:2212.08671, doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012040

    2024 doi arXiv

  252. [265]

    Blakie, D

    P. Blakie, D. Baillie, R. Bisset, Roton spectroscopy in a harmonically trapped dipolar bose- einstein condensate, Physical Review A 86 (2) (2012) 021604. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.86. 021604

    2012 doi

  253. [266]

    Chomaz, R

    L. Chomaz, R. M. van Bijnen, D. Petter, G. Faraoni, S. Baier, J. H. Becher, M. J. Mark, F. Waechtler, L. Santos, F. Ferlaino, Observation of roton mode population in a dipolar quantum gas, Nature physics 14 (5) (2018) 442–446.doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0054-7

    2018 doi

  254. [267]

    L. D. Landau, I. M. Khalatnikov, The Theory of the Viscosity of Helium II: I. Colli- sions of Elementary Excitations in Helium II, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 19. doi:10.1016/ b978-0-08-010586-4.50074-2

  255. [268]

    L. D. Landau, I. M. Khalatnikov, The Theory of the Viscosity of Helium II. II Calculation of the Viscosity Coefficient, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 19. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-010586-4.50075-4

    doi

  256. [269]

    L. D. Landau, On the Theory of Superfluidity of Helium II, J. Phys. (USSR) 11. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-010586-4.50068-7

    doi

  257. [270]

    R. P. Feynman, Atomic theory of the two-fluid model of liquid helium, Physical Review 94 (2) (1954) 262.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.94.262

    1954 doi

  258. [271]

    H. R. Glyde, The role of the condensate in the existence of phonons and rotons, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 93 (1993) 861–878.doi:10.1007/BF00692035

    1993 doi

  259. [272]

    Godfrin, K

    H. Godfrin, K. Beauvois, A. Sultan, E. Krotscheck, J. Dawidowski, B. F˚ ak, J. Ollivier, Disper- sion relation of landau elementary excitations and thermodynamic properties of superfluid he 4, Physical Review B 103 (10) (2021) 104516.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.104516

    2021 doi

  260. [273]

    K. T. Matchev, J. Smolinsky, W. Xue, Y. You, Superfluid effective field theory for dark matter direct detection, JHEP 05 (2022) 034.arXiv:2108.07275,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)034

    2022 doi arXiv

  261. [275]

    Berezhiani, B

    L. Berezhiani, B. Elder, J. Khoury, Dynamical Friction in Superfluids, JCAP 10 (2019) 074. arXiv:1905.09297,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/074. 136

    2019 doi arXiv

  262. [276]

    Berezhiani, On effective theory of superfluid phonons, Phys

    L. Berezhiani, On effective theory of superfluid phonons, Phys. Lett. B 805 (2020) 135451. arXiv:2001.08696,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135451

    2020 doi arXiv

  263. [277]

    Lancaster, C

    L. Lancaster, C. Giovanetti, P. Mocz, Y. Kahn, M. Lisanti, D. N. Spergel, Dynamical Friction in a Fuzzy Dark Matter Universe, JCAP 01 (2020) 001. arXiv:1909.06381, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/001

    2020 doi arXiv

  264. [278]

    S. T. H. Hartman, H. A. Winther, D. F. Mota, Dynamical friction in Bose-Einstein condensed self-interacting dark matter at finite temperatures, and the Fornax dwarf spheroidal, Astron. Astrophys. 647 (2021) A70.arXiv:2011.00116,doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039865

    2021 doi arXiv

  265. [279]

    Berezhiani, G

    L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia, G. Contri, Coherence and Quantum Stability of Relativistic Superfluid States.arXiv:2509.21667

    arXiv

  266. [280]

    Haber, A

    A. Haber, A. Schmitt, S. Stetina, Instabilities in relativistic two-component (super)fluids, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2) (2016) 025011. arXiv:1510.01982, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.025011

    2016 doi arXiv

  267. [281]

    Haber, A

    A. Haber, A. Schmitt, Critical magnetic fields in a superconductor coupled to a superfluid, Phys. Rev. D 95 (11) (2017) 116016.arXiv:1704.01575,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.116016

    2017 doi arXiv

  268. [282]

    Haber, A

    A. Haber, A. Schmitt, New color-magnetic defects in dense quark matter, J. Phys. G 45 (6) (2018) 065001.arXiv:1712.08587,doi:10.1088/1361-6471/aabc1a

    2018 doi arXiv

  269. [283]

    Trabucco, L

    S. Trabucco, L. Lepori, M. Luisa Chiofalo, M. Mannarelli, Binary superfluids: Low-energy properties and dissipative processes from spontaneous emission of massive phonons, Phys. Rev. D 111 (12) (2025) 125024.arXiv:2501.10194,doi:10.1103/sy1v-g8t9

    2025 doi arXiv

  270. [284]

    L. V. Delacr´ etaz, D. M. Hofman, G. Mathys, Superfluids as Higher-form Anomalies, SciPost Phys. 8 (2020) 047.arXiv:1908.06977,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.3.047

    2020 doi arXiv

  271. [285]

    Khoury, J

    J. Khoury, J. Sakstein, A. R. Solomon, Superfluids and the Cosmological Constant Problem, JCAP 08 (2018) 024.arXiv:1805.05937,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/024

    2018 doi arXiv

  272. [286]

    Pajer, D

    E. Pajer, D. Stefanyszyn, Symmetric Superfluids, JHEP 06 (2019) 008. arXiv:1812.05133, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2019)008

    2019 doi arXiv

  273. [287]

    Tkachenko, Elasticity of vortex lattices, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 29 (1969) 945

    V. Tkachenko, Elasticity of vortex lattices, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 29 (1969) 945

    1969

  274. [288]

    G l´ odkowski, S

    A. G l´ odkowski, S. Moroz, F. Pe˜ na-Ben´ ıtez, P. Sur´ owka, Effective field theory for the superfluid vortex lattice from coset construction, Phys. Rev. B 113 (2) (2026) 024506. arXiv:2507.13352, doi:10.1103/m1b1-94f7

    2026 doi

  275. [289]

    D. X. Nguyen, A. Gromov, S. Moroz, Fracton-elasticity duality of two-dimensional superfluid vortex crystals: defect interactions and quantum melting, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 076. arXiv: 2005.12317,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.5.076

    2020 doi arXiv

  276. [290]

    D. X. Nguyen, S. Moroz, On quantum melting of superfluid vortex crystals: From Lifshitz scalar to dual gravity, SciPost Phys. 17 (6) (2024) 164. arXiv:2310.13741, doi:10.21468/ SciPostPhys.17.6.164

    2024 arXiv

  277. [291]

    A. M. n. Mateo, X. Yu, J. Nian, Vortex lines attached to dark solitons in Bose-Einstein condensates and Boson-Vortex Duality in 3+1 Dimensions, Phys. Rev. A 94 (6) (2016) 063623. arXiv:1606.02776,doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.063623. 137

    2016 doi arXiv

  278. [292]

    Esposito, R

    A. Esposito, R. Krichevsky, A. Nicolis, Vortex precession in trapped superfluids from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. A 96 (3) (2017) 033615. arXiv:1704.08267, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA. 96.033615

    2017 doi arXiv

  279. [293]

    Garcia-Saenz, E

    S. Garcia-Saenz, E. Mitsou, A. Nicolis, A multipole-expanded effective field theory for vortex ring-sound interactions, JHEP 02 (2018) 022. arXiv:1709.01927, doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2018)022

    2018 arXiv

  280. [294]

    Hellerman, D

    S. Hellerman, D. Orlando, S. Reffert, M. Watanabe, On the CFT Operator Spectrum at Large Global Charge, JHEP 12 (2015) 071.arXiv:1505.01537,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2015)071

    2015 doi arXiv

  281. [295]

    Monin, D

    A. Monin, D. Pirtskhalava, R. Rattazzi, F. K. Seibold, Semiclassics, Goldstone Bosons and CFT data, JHEP 06 (2017) 011.arXiv:1611.02912,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2017)011

    2017 doi arXiv

  282. [296]

    Loukas, Abelian scalar theory at large global charge, Fortsch

    O. Loukas, Abelian scalar theory at large global charge, Fortsch. Phys. 65 (9) (2017) 1700028. arXiv:1612.08985,doi:10.1002/prop.201700028

    2017 doi arXiv

  283. [297]

    Banerjee, S

    D. Banerjee, S. Chandrasekharan, D. Orlando, Conformal dimensions via large charge expan- sion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (6) (2018) 061603. arXiv:1707.00711, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 120.061603

    2018 doi arXiv

  284. [298]

    Cuomo, A

    G. Cuomo, A. de la Fuente, A. Monin, D. Pirtskhalava, R. Rattazzi, Rotating superfluids and spinning charged operators in conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. D 97 (4) (2018) 045012. arXiv:1711.02108,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.045012

    2018 doi arXiv

  285. [299]

    Cuomo, L

    G. Cuomo, L. V. Delacretaz, U. Mehta, Large Charge Sector of 3d Parity-Violating CFTs, JHEP 05 (2021) 115.arXiv:2102.05046,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)115

    2021 doi arXiv

  286. [300]

    Cuomo, Superfluids, vortices and spinning charged operators in 4d CFT, JHEP 02 (2020) 119.arXiv:1906.07283,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2020)119

    G. Cuomo, Superfluids, vortices and spinning charged operators in 4d CFT, JHEP 02 (2020) 119.arXiv:1906.07283,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2020)119

    2020 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.