Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

This paper argues that the highly insulating low-density state in rhombohedral pentalayer graphene is a Wigner crystal — a frozen lattice of electrons — and that this crystal is the parent phase from which field-stabilized superconductivity

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 00:24 UTC pith:MWP3VENH

load-bearing objection A useful R5G phase diagram with a plausible but not uniquely established Wigner crystal anchor; the boundary-continuity claim is the real news, not the individual phases. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15014 v1 pith:MWP3VENH submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Competing Orders Driven by Wigner Crystal Phase in Rhombohedral Graphene

Zekang Zhou , Kilian Kr\"otzsch , Rapha\"el Ayache , Yonggen Li , Sandeep Joy , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi , Moty Heiblum
show 2 more authors
Preden Roulleau Mitali Banerjee
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con PACS 73.22.Pr71.30.+h
keywords Wigner crystalrhombohedral graphenestrong correlationssuperconductivityreentrant quantum Hallmetallic Wigner crystalphase diagramflat bands
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies the extremely insulating state that appears at low carrier densities in rhombohedral pentalayer graphene (R5G) as a Wigner crystal, an interaction-driven electron solid. It then shows that a hole-doped metallic Wigner crystal forms at the crystal's edge, and that under a magnetic field, superconductivity and reentrant quantum Hall states grow out of these crystalline phases. The phase boundary between the insulating and metallic crystal evolves continuously into the boundary between the superconducting and quantum Hall regions, suggesting all four states are descendants of a common crystalline background. If correct, the Wigner crystal is not an isolated curiosity but the organizing principle of the R5G phase diagram.

Core claim

The highly insulating state on the low-density side of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral pentalayer graphene is a Wigner crystal. Transport across this state shows a sharp threshold in DC bias and pronounced hysteresis — the characteristic signatures of a disorder-pinned electron crystal being collectively depinned by a critical electric field. Near the crystal's upper boundary a distinct, hole-doped metallic Wigner crystal emerges, identified by a dip in longitudinal resistance and a sign reversal of the Hall resistance. Under an out-of-plane magnetic field, the metallic crystal region gives rise to two competing phases: field-stabilized superconductivity, marked by a vanishing Hall

What carries the argument

The central diagnostic is threshold-bias conduction with hysteresis: a pinned Wigner crystal conducts almost nothing until a critical DC bias depins it, producing a sharp conductance rise and a hysteretic loop between forward and backward sweeps. This signature, together with Hall-resistance sign reversal that identifies the polarity of self-doped itinerant carriers, is used to map the Wigner crystal and metallic Wigner crystal phases. The Landau fan diagram then reveals reentrant quantum Hall states that extrapolate back to the zero-field Wigner crystal boundary, and a continuous phase boundary links the metallic-Wigner-crystal/metal transition to the superconductor/reentrant-quantum-Hall t

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that threshold-bias conduction with hysteresis uniquely fingerprints a pinned Wigner crystal; if the insulating state were instead a charge density wave, an electronic glass, or a contact artifact, the identification of the crystal and all subsequent phase-boundary arguments would lose their anchor.

What would settle it

Imaging the insulating state with a local probe such as scanning tunneling microscopy: a hexagonal lattice of localized charges at the density-determined Wigner crystal spacing would confirm the crystal, while a featureless or amorphous electronic texture would falsify it. Alternatively, measuring the collective pinning frequency and finding it inconsistent with the expected shear modulus of a Wigner crystal, or observing the same threshold-hysteresis transport in a channel with different contacts, would undermine the fingerprint.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The low-density insulating state in rhombohedral graphene, previously unexplained, is pinned down as a Wigner crystal, closing a gap in the phase diagram of multilayer rhombohedral systems.
  • The metallic Wigner crystal appears in both hole-doped and, by inference, electron-doped forms, meaning the crystal can host itinerant carriers of either sign within the same crystalline lattice.
  • The field-stabilized superconducting phase and the reentrant quantum Hall states are not independent of the zero-field state: they evolve continuously from the Wigner crystal and metallic Wigner crystal, implying a common origin.
  • The reentrant quantum Hall states deviate from the Streda formula and originate from the Wigner crystal boundary, indicating they are not conventional Landau-level states but are tied to the localized carrier population of the crystal.
  • The comparable critical temperatures of all four phases and their continuous connectivity suggest that superconductivity may involve pairing among the self-doped itinerant carriers of the metallic Wigner crystal rather than the full electron fluid.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Wigner crystal is truly the parent state, the same continuous-boundary logic may hold in other rhombohedral multilayer graphene systems, meaning the crystal could be the organizing feature across layer numbers, not just in pentalayer.
  • A direct test would be scanning tunneling microscopy imaging of the insulating state: a periodic charge lattice at the expected Wigner crystal spacing would confirm the assignment, while an amorphous or striped texture would point to a glass or charge density wave instead.
  • The reentrant quantum Hall states with filling fractions like 3 and 2 that emerge at the crystal boundary could be interpreted as Landau quantization of the itinerant carriers in an electron-doped metallic Wigner crystal; measuring their excitation gaps versus magnetic field would distinguish this from a topological Wigner crystal with a many-body Chern number.
  • If the vanishing Hall resistance in the superconducting region truly reflects an emergent particle-hole symmetry of the superconducting state, shot-noise measurements of quasiparticle charge could reveal whether the residual longitudinal resistance is an intrinsic anomalous metal or a percolation artifact.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports transport measurements on rhombohedral pentalayer graphene (R5G) and interprets a highly insulating low-density region, adjacent to chiral superconductivity, as a Wigner crystal (WC). It further identifies a hole-doped metallic Wigner crystal (h-mWC) near the WC boundary, and, under an out-of-plane magnetic field, a field-stabilized superconducting state (fSC) and unconventional reentrant integer quantum Hall (RIQH) states. The authors argue that these phases are all connected to the WC phase, with the WC/mWC boundary evolving continuously into the fSC/RIQH boundary. The primary evidence for the WC identification is threshold-bias conduction with hysteresis at one point in the phase diagram, supported by the observation of a negative Hall resistance in the mWC region and the behavior of RIQH states tracing back to the WC boundary.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes a Wigner crystal as a central organizing phase in non-moiré rhombohedral graphene and suggests that the neighboring superconductivity and reentrant quantum Hall states are descendants of the crystalline order. This would be a significant advance for the field of strongly correlated flat-band systems. The manuscript contains a rich set of transport data, including two devices, magnetic-field-dependent maps, Landau fans, and temperature studies, and it makes contact with recent theoretical work on metallic and topological Wigner crystals. The strengths of the paper are the breadth of the phase diagram characterization and the clear presentation of an overarching interpretation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section I, Figs. 1d–1f and E1] The central identification of the insulating state as a Wigner crystal rests entirely on threshold-bias conduction and hysteresis. These features are explicitly stated to be 'characteristic transport signatures of a Wigner crystal,' but they are not unique to Wigner crystals: pinned charge density waves, electronic glasses, and contact-dominated injection can produce similar nonlinear, hysteretic transport. The paper itself treats the same nonlinear behavior in region II (Fig. E7) as evidence only of a 'charge-ordered state,' highlighting the ambiguity. To support the WC assignment, the authors need to either rule out CDW/glass/contact scenarios with additional measurements (e.g., depinning scaling, frequency response, nonlocal transport) or show a specific fingerprint such as a density-dependent melting temperature consistent with the WC melting criterion. As it stands, the foundational
  2. [Section III, Fig. 3a–3d] The interpretation of the RIQH states as arising from an electron-doped metallic Wigner crystal (e-mWC) is speculative. The text states this 'may be anticipated' and is 'consistent with this interpretation,' but no microscopic model or quantitative extraction from the data (beyond an estimated 50% itinerant fraction) is provided. The deviation from the Středa formula is attributed to 'changes in the density of localized carriers' without a derivation. Alternative explanations, such as Landau levels of a different band crossing the Fermi level or a topological Wigner crystal, are mentioned but not excluded. Given that the RIQH states are a key piece of evidence for the 'WC phase as parent' narrative, this interpretation needs to be better constrained, or at least the alternative scenarios should be compared quantitatively with the data.
  3. [Section V (Discussion)] The claimed superconducting state (fSC) is explicitly hedged: 'a perfectly vanishing Rxx is not observed.' The evidence consists of a drop in Rxx, vanishing Rxy, and a critical-current-like nonlinearity. The finite Rxx is attributed to an anomalous metal, but the distinction between a weakly insulating state, a phase with partial superconductivity, and an anomalous metal is not resolved. While this is not the paper's central claim (the WC is), the title and discussion treat fSC as one of the competing orders emerging from the WC. The authors should clarify what specific observable would distinguish these possibilities, or soften the language from 'superconductivity' to 'superconducting-like' in the title and abstract if the evidence remains incomplete.
  4. [Abstract and Section V (Discussion)] The abstract asserts that the insulating state 'corresponds to a Wigner crystal (WC) phase' as an established fact, but the body of the paper contains several hedges: the mWC nature is stated to 'warrant further investigation,' the microscopic mechanism for RIQH state selection is 'unknown,' and the fSC state is acknowledged not to show zero resistance. The abstract and conclusions present the WC identification and the continuity of phase boundaries with more confidence than the presented evidence and the text's own caveats support. The authors should align the abstract with the level of support actually provided, either by adding the necessary evidence or by framing the WC phase as a likely interpretation rather than a proven identity.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] In the first paragraph, the reference list contains a corrupted entry: '[2?–10]' should be '[2–10]'. Also, the reference to Ref. [42] appears to have a typo in the title ('Astability' likely should be 'Instability').
  2. [References] The caption for Fig. E7 mentions 'nonlinear V–I behavior' but the figure shows differential resistance maps; the text in the paper should be consistent in terminology.
  3. [General] The notation 'Stˇ reda formula' should use the standard spelling 'Středa formula' with the appropriate diacritic.
  4. [General] The data availability statement is minimal ('available upon reasonable request'). Given the field's move toward open data, a more detailed statement or a repository would strengthen reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the WC identification rests on external transport-fingerprint literature and direct measurements, not on fitted relations or self-citations that predefine the conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that the highly insulating state on the low-density side of cSC1 is a Wigner crystal—is inferred from measured DC-bias threshold conduction and hysteresis, explicitly citing external work ([38]–[43]) for the fingerprint 'characteristic transport signatures of a Wigner crystal' (Section I, Fig. 1c). This is an interpretive identification based on independent experimental and theoretical literature, not a derivation from fitted parameters. No equation in the paper defines the WC phase in terms of the RIQH or fSC states, or vice versa. The later statements—that RIQH states trace back to the WC boundary, that the fSC/RIQH boundary connects to the mWC/WC boundary, and that RIQH states may be Landau levels of an electron-doped mWC—are phenomenological consistency arguments based on the topology of measured phase diagrams; they do not reduce by construction to their inputs. The mWC assignment additionally uses independent Hall-sign-reversal data and is compared with a separate experimental report [44] by a different group. Self-citations by co-author S. Joy (refs. [11] and [26]) are background citations for theoretical concepts (Berry-curvature chirality and microemulsion windows) and are not load-bearing for the experimental conclusions. The manuscript also openly lists unresolved aspects, such as the microscopic stabilization mechanism of RIQH states, the origin of finite Rxx in the fSC candidate, and the need for future STM measurements, which further indicates that the claims are not closed loops. Any weakness in the WC fingerprint—e.g., that threshold/hysteresis transport can also appear in CDWs or contact-dominated injection—is a diagnostic ambiguity and a correctness risk, not circularity, because the identification is anchored in external citations and falsifiable transport data rather than in the paper's own conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The report is entirely experimental phenomenology. The free-parameter list is empty because no fitting of a theoretical model is performed. The load-bearing axioms are the interpretive steps that map transport fingerprints (hysteresis, Hall sign reversal, quantized plateaus) to specific electronic phases. The only invented entity is the electron-doped metallic Wigner crystal, which is an inferred phase not directly observed.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The observed threshold-bias conduction and hysteresis in the low-density insulating state are characteristic transport signatures of a pinned Wigner crystal (collective pinning/depinning).
    Section I; this is the basis for identifying the insulating state as a WC, but the same signatures can appear for other pinned charge-ordered states; no alternative mechanisms are excluded.
  • domain assumption The negative Hall resistance in the mWC region indicates hole-like itinerant carriers coexisting with a pinned electron Wigner crystal.
    Section I; sign reversal of Rxy at finite B is interpreted via self-doping theory (Refs 27-33) without an independent probe of carrier type.
  • domain assumption RIQH states emerging from the WC boundary are Landau levels of itinerant carriers in an electron-doped mWC phase.
    Section IV; the paper presents this as 'most likely' interpretation and lists alternatives; the 50% itinerant fraction is extracted from the quantized Hall resistance under this assumption.
  • domain assumption The devices are rhombohedral-stacked pentalayer graphene with no moiré alignment; carrier density and displacement field are correctly calibrated from Hall and gate capacitances.
    Methods section; the entire phase diagram depends on this sample identity and calibration.
invented entities (1)
  • electron-doped metallic Wigner crystal (e-mWC) phase in region I no independent evidence
    purpose: to explain the unconventional RIQH states whose Hall quantization deviates from the Streda formula
    The paper infers e-mWC from transport consistency (RIQH states trace to WC boundary) but has no direct probe (e.g., STM); an alternative topological Wigner crystal scenario is also offered.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13370 in / 13395 out tokens · 143648 ms · 2026-08-02T00:24:05.374912+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Rhombohedral graphene systems provide a unique platform where strong electronic interactions and nontrivial band topology coexist at low carrier densities and high displacement fields, giving rise to a rich landscape of emergent electronic phases. Here, we report that the highly insulating state on the low-density side of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral pentalayer graphene (R5G) corresponds to a Wigner crystal (WC) phase. In addition, a hole-doped metallic Wigner crystal (h-mWC) phase emerges near the WC boundary. Under an out-of-plane magnetic field, the system hosts competing magnetic-field-stabilized superconductivity (fSC) and unconventional reentrant quantum Hall (RIQH) states. These emergent phases are closely connected to the underlying WC and mWC states and evolve continuously across phase boundaries. Our results establish that WC phase plays an important role in the phase diagram of rhombohedral multilayer graphene and highlight its connection to a rich landscape of emergent phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15014 by Kenji Watanabe, Kilian Kr\"otzsch, Mitali Banerjee, Moty Heiblum, Preden Roulleau, Rapha\"el Ayache, Sandeep Joy, Takashi Taniguchi, Yonggen Li, Zekang Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: b shows the Landau fan diagrams of Rxx and Rxy at D = 1 V/nm. At both low and high carrier densities, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nematic Wigner crystals in rhombohedral multilayer graphene

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Projected Hartree–Fock and time-dependent Hartree–Fock calculations predict a spontaneously C3-breaking (nematic) Wigner crystal that is locally stable in a region of the rhombohedral tetralayer graphene phase diagram.

  2. Rhombohedral Graphene: A Tale of Many Crystals

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A Mexican-hat band dispersion in rhombohedral graphene is predicted to stabilize four electron-crystal phases—Wigner, nodal Wigner, self-doped 'phantom' crystal, and hole-lattice 'anticrystal'—mapped over density and ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Physical Review46, 1002 (1934)

    E. Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Physical Review46, 1002 (1934)

    1934

  2. [2]

    Grimes and G

    C. Grimes and G. Adams, Evidence for a liquid-to-crystal phase transition in a classical, two-dimensional sheet of electrons, Physical Review Letters42, 795 (1979)

    1979

  3. [3]

    Andrei, G

    E. Andrei, G. Deville, D. Glattli, F. Williams, E. Paris, and B. Etienne, Observation of a magnetically induced wigner solid, Physical review letters60, 2765 (1988)

    1988

  4. [4]

    J. Yoon, C. Li, D. Shahar, D. Tsui, and M. Shayegan, Wigner crystallization and metal-insulator transition of two-dimensional holes in gaas at b= 0, Physical review letters82, 1744 (1999)

    1999

  5. [5]

    S. Chen, R. Ribeiro-Palau, K. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, M. O. Goerbig, and C. R. Dean, Competing fractional quantum hall and electron solid phases in graphene, Physical review letters122, 026802 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Falson, I

    J. Falson, I. Sodemann, B. Skinner, D. Tabrea, Y. Kozuka, A. Tsukazaki, M. Kawasaki, K. von Klitzing, and J. H. Smet, Competing correlated states around the zero-field wigner crystallization transition of electrons in two dimensions, Nature materials21, 311 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Smole´ nski, P

    T. Smole´ nski, P. E. Dolgirev, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Pop- ert, Y. Shimazaki, P. Back, X. Lu, M. Kroner, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Signatures of wigner crystal of electrons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nature595, 53 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Y. Zhou, J. Sung, E. Brutschea, I. Esterlis, Y. Wang, G. Scuri, R. J. Gelly, H. Heo, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe,et al., Bilayer wigner crystals in a transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructure, Nature595, 48 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    Y.-C. Tsui, M. He, Y. Hu, E. Lake, T. Wang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Yazdani, Direct observation of a magnetic-field-induced wigner crystal, Nature628, 287 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Xiang, H

    Z. Xiang, H. Li, J. Xiao, M. H. Naik, Z. Ge, Z. He, S. Chen, J. Nie, S. Li, Y. Jiang,et al., Imaging quantum melting in a disordered 2d wigner solid, Science388, 736 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    S. Joy, L. Levitov, and B. Skinner, Chiral wigner crys- tal phases induced by berry curvature, Physical Review Letters135, 256502 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    Soejima, J

    T. Soejima, J. Dong, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker,λ- jellium model for the anomalous hall crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 186505 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    hall crys- tal

    Z. Teˇ sanovi´ c, F. Axel, and B. Halperin, “hall crys- tal”versus wigner crystal, Physical Review B39, 8525 (1989)

    1989

  14. [14]

    B. Zhou, H. Yang, and Y.-H. Zhang, Fractional quan- tum anomalous hall effect in rhombohedral multilayer graphene in the moir´ eless limit, Physical Review Letters 133, 206504 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Soejima, J

    T. Soejima, J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, M. P. Zale- tel, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Anomalous hall crystals in rhombohedral multilayer graphene. ii. gen- eral mechanism and a minimal model, Physical Review B110, 205124 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, T. Soejima, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Anomalous hall crys- tals in rhombohedral multilayer graphene. i. interaction- driven chern bands and fractional quantum hall states at zero magnetic field, Physical Review Letters133, 206503 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Z. Dong, A. S. Patri, and T. Senthil, Stability of anoma- lous hall crystals in multilayer rhombohedral graphene, Physical Review B110, 205130 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Y. Zeng, D. Guerci, V. Cr´ epel, A. J. Millis, and J. Cano, Sublattice structure and topology in spontaneously crys- tallized electronic states, Physical Review Letters132, 236601 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Tan and T

    T. Tan and T. Devakul, Parent berry curvature and the ideal anomalous hall crystal, Physical Review X14, 041040 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Y. H. Kwan, J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, D. K. Efetov, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Moir´ e fractional chern insulators. iii. hartree-fock phase diagram, magic angle regime for chern insulator states, role of moir´ e potential, and goldstone gaps in rhombohedral graphene superlat- tices, Physical Review B112, 075109 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Valenti, Y

    A. Valenti, Y. Vituri, Y. Yang, D. E. Parker, T. Soe- jima, J. Dong, M. A. Morales, A. Vishwanath, E. Berg, and S. Zhang, Quantum geometry driven crystallization: A neural-network variational monte carlo study, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07947 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Desrochers, J

    F. Desrochers, J. Huxford, M. R. Hirsbrunner, and Y. B. Kim, Electronic crystal phases in the presence of nonuni- form berry curvature and tunable berry flux: Theλn- jellium model, Physical Review B113, 045148 (2026)

    2026

  23. [23]

    Spivak and S

    B. Spivak and S. A. Kivelson, Phases intermediate be- tween a two-dimensional electron liquid and wigner crys- tal, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materi- als Physics70, 155114 (2004)

    2004

  24. [24]

    Spivak, S

    B. Spivak, S. V. Kravchenko, S. A. Kivelson, and X. P. A. Gao, Transport in strongly correlated two-dimensional electron fluids, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 1743 (2010)

    2010

  25. [25]

    Jamei, S

    R. Jamei, S. Kivelson, and B. Spivak, Universal aspects of coulomb-frustrated phase separation, Physical review letters94, 056805 (2005)

    2005

  26. [26]

    Joy and B

    S. Joy and B. Skinner, Upper bound on the window of density occupied by microemulsion phases in two- dimensional electron systems, Physical Review B108, L241110 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Andreev and I

    A. Andreev and I. Lifshits, Quantum theory of defects in crystals, Zhur Eksper Teoret Fiziki56, 2057 (1969)

    2057

  28. [28]

    D. S. Fisher, B. Halperin, and R. Morf, Defects in the two-dimensional electron solid and implications for melt- ing, Physical Review B20, 4692 (1979)

    1979

  29. [29]

    Cockayne and V

    E. Cockayne and V. Elser, Energetics of point defects in the two-dimensional wigner crystal, Physical Review B 43, 623 (1991)

    1991

  30. [30]

    Pankov and V

    S. Pankov and V. Dobrosavljevi´ c, Self-doping insta- bility of the wigner-mott insulator, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics77, 085104 (2008)

    2008

  31. [31]

    K.-S. Kim, I. Esterlis, C. Murthy, and S. A. Kivelson, Dynamical defects in a two-dimensional wigner crystal: Self-doping and kinetic magnetism, Physical Review B 109, 235130 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    J. Dong, T. Soejima, D. E. Parker, and A. Vish- wanath, Crystals caught doping: Metallic wigner crystals in rhombohedral graphene, arXiv preprint 9 arXiv:2604.00114 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    J. Feng, Z. Han, M. P. Zaletel, and Z. Dong, Self-doped crystal from preempted band-inversion transitions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.09820 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature626, 759 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    J. Xie, Z. Huo, X. Lu, Z. Feng, Z. Zhang, W. Wang, Q. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Liu,et al., Tunable fractional chern insulators in rhombohedral graphene superlattices, Nature Materials24, 1042 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, Z. Hadjri, L. Shi, Z. Wu, W. Xu, Y. Yao, A. A. Cotten, O. Sharifi Sedeh, H. Weldeyesus,et al., Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, Nature643, 654 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, Z. Hadjri, J. Yang, J. Seo, L. Shi, S. Ye, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Extended quan- tum anomalous hall states in graphene/hbn moir´ e super- lattices, Nature637, 1090 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Littlewood and C

    P. Littlewood and C. Varma, Pinning, metastability, and sliding of charge-density waves in an electric field, Phys- ical Review B36, 480 (1987)

    1987

  39. [39]

    Gr¨ uner, The dynamics of charge-density waves, Rev

    G. Gr¨ uner, The dynamics of charge-density waves, Rev. Mod. Phys.60, 1129 (1988)

    1988

  40. [40]

    Williams, P

    F. Williams, P. Wright, R. Clark, E. Andrei, G. Deville, D. Glattli, O. Probst, B. Etienne, C. Dorin, C. Foxon, et al., Conduction threshold and pinning frequency of magnetically induced wigner solid, Physical review letters 66, 3285 (1991)

    1991

  41. [41]

    Willett, H

    R. Willett, H. Stormer, D. Tsui, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, M. Shayegan, M. Santos, and T. Sajoto, Current-voltage discontinuities in high-quality two-dimensional electron systems at low landau-level filling factors, Physical Re- view B40, 6432 (1989)

    1989

  42. [42]

    Cs´ athy, D

    G. Cs´ athy, D. Tsui, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Astability and negative differential resistance of the wigner solid, Physical review letters98, 066805 (2007)

    2007

  43. [43]

    Munyan, S

    S. Munyan, S. Ahadi, B. Guo, A. Rashidi, and S. Stem- mer, Evidence of zero-field wigner solids in ultrathin films of cadmium arsenide, Physical Review X14, 041037 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    T. Han, J. P. Butler, S. Ye, Z. Hua, S. Dutta, Z. Had- jri, Z. Wu, J. Yang, J. Seo, P. Pattanakanvijit,et al., Evidence of metallic wigner crystal in rhombohedral graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.00113 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Qin, H.-T

    P. Qin, H.-T. Wu, R. Q. Nguyen, E. Morissette, N. J. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and J. Li, Extreme anisotropy in the metallic and superconducting phases of rhombohedral hexalayer graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05129 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    H. Zhou, T. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nature598, 434 (2021)

    2021

  47. [47]

    J. Yang, X. Shi, S. Ye, C. Yoon, Z. Lu, V. Kakani, T. Han, J. Seo, L. Shi, K. Watanabe,et al., Impact of spin–orbit coupling on superconductivity in rhombohe- dral graphene, Nature Materials24, 1058 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    J. Seo, A. A. Cotten, M. Xu, O. S. Sedeh, H. Weldeyesus, T. Han, Z. Lu, Z. Wu, S. Ye, W. Xu,et al., Family of un- conventional superconductivities in crystalline graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.03295 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    J. Xie, Z. Huo, Z. Chen, Z. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, X. Lin, and X. Lu, Magnetic-field- driven insulator-superconductor transition in rhombo- hedral graphene, Physical Review Letters136, 176505 (2026)

    2026

  50. [50]

    Kapitulnik, S

    A. Kapitulnik, S. A. Kivelson, and B. Spivak, Collo- quium: anomalous metals: failed superconductors, Re- views of Modern Physics91, 011002 (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Okounkova,et al., competing anomalous metal and su- perconducting phases in rhombohedral graphene (2026), submitted

    A. Okounkova,et al., competing anomalous metal and su- perconducting phases in rhombohedral graphene (2026), submitted

    2026

  52. [52]

    N. P. Breznay and A. Kapitulnik, Particle-hole symmetry reveals failed superconductivity in the metallic phase of two-dimensional superconducting films, Science advances 3, e1700612 (2017)

    2017

  53. [53]

    R. Q. Nguyen, H.-T. Wu, E. Morissette, N. J. Zhang, P. Qin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. W. Hui, D. E. Feldman, and J. Li, A hierarchy of superconductivity and topological charge density wave states in rhombohedral graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.22026 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Y. E. Lozovik and V. Yudson, Crystallization of a two- dimensional electron gas in a magnetic field, ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu22, 26 (1975)

    1975

  55. [55]

    Goldman, M

    V. Goldman, M. Santos, M. Shayegan, and J. Cunning- ham, Evidence for two-dimentional quantum wigner crys- tal, Physical review letters65, 2189 (1990)

    1990

  56. [56]

    J. P. Eisenstein, K. B. Cooper, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Insulating and fractional quantum hall states in the first excited landau level, Physical Review Letters 88, 076801 (2002)

    2002

  57. [57]

    W. Li, D. R. Luhman, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Observation of reentrant phases induced by short-range disorder in the lowest landau level of alxga1−xAs/al0.32ga0.68As heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 076803 (2010)

    2010

  58. [58]

    M. M. Fogler, A. A. Koulakov, and B. I. Shklovskii, Ground state of a two-dimensional electron liquid in a weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B54, 1853 (1996)

    1996

  59. [59]

    A. A. Koulakov, M. M. Fogler, and B. I. Shklovskii, Charge density wave in two-dimensional electron liquid in weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 499 (1996)

    1996

  60. [60]

    dragging

    R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Exact results for inter- acting electrons in high landau levels, Phys. Rev. B54, 5006 (1996). METHODS A. Sample fabrication and Measurements The material stacks are fabricated using a dry-transfer technique based on a two-step procedure. First, we prepare the bottom part of the device, consisting of the bottom hBN and the bo...

    1996