Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Doping the 1/3 fractional Chern insulator produces a hidden Fermi surface of emergent charge-e/3 fermions — a twisted Z3 orthogonal metal — whose pairing descendants are superconductors with tunable chiral central charge.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 23:43 UTC pith:LADN4QJO

load-bearing objection A genuinely new single-pocket Z3 orthogonal metal from e/3 anyons, with clean response formulas and a load-bearing wave-function step that needs checking. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15274 v1 pith:LADN4QJO submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.str-el

Single-component twisted mathbb{Z}₃ orthogonal metal in an e/3-anyon fluid

Zhaoyu Han , Ashvin Vishwanath , Eslam Khalaf This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 71.10.-w71.10.Pm73.43.-f74.20.-z
keywords fractional Chern insulatoranyon dopingorthogonal metalfractionalized Fermi liquidquantum oscillationsanyon superconductivitychiral central chargeLaughlin states
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Doping a 1/3 fractional Chern insulator with charge density δ is predicted not to create ordinary electrons or holes but to reorganize the injected e/3 anyons into a hidden Fermi surface of emergent charge-e/3 fermions, governed by a twisted Z3 gauge field. This state — a twisted Z3 orthogonal metal — has no electron quasiparticle weight, yet behaves as a single-component Fermi liquid of fractionalized fermions, with e/3 shot noise, a quantum oscillation frequency 9|δ|/(2π), and a longitudinal conductivity one third of a conventional Fermi liquid at the same density. The decisive consequence is that pairing this hidden Fermi surface confines the parent topological order and produces a family of superconductors whose chiral central charge c_- = C_maj/2 + 3 is set by the pairing topology, including integer and half-integer values such as the c_- = -1/2 seen numerically near the 2/3 state of twisted MoTe2. The authors provide an explicit wave-function ansatz for the phase and argue that inter-valley repulsion among anyons favors it over competing metallic states. The same construction extends to the Laughlin sequence at fillings 1/m but not to Jain states.

Core claim

At filling ν=1/3+δ per unit cell, the doped anyons are described by composite bosons in three valleys. The central step is the parton factorization φ_v = f·g_v with an emergent U(1) gauge field a: each valley species g_v fills a ν=1 integer quantum Hall band, absorbing the commensurate 1/3 background flux, while the common fermion f sees zero average flux and, after cancellation of the statistical flux in the effective Kähler potential, forms a single Fermi surface at density 3δ. Integrating out the g_v sectors converts the gauge field into a Dijkgraaf-Witten twisted Z3 gauge field. The equations of motion show f excitations carry electric charge e/3 and the physical current is J = (1/3)J_f

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the valley-resolved parton decomposition φ_v = f·g_v plus the Kähler-potential cancellation that lets the f factor see zero net statistical flux. The three g_v factors fill ν=1 IQH states and make the valley structure gapped, while f forms the hidden Fermi surface; the emergent gauge field a is Higgsed to a Dijkgraaf-Witten twisted Z3 gauge field, named for the discrete gauge structure that remains. This machinery converts a strongly coupled anyon gas into a weakly interacting fractionalized Fermi liquid and fixes all subsequent predictions: e/3 charge, the factor-of-nine quantum oscillation frequency, the reduced conductivity, and the pairing descendants with c_-

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction rests on the assumption that the injected e/3 anyons stay elementary and that the wave-function bookkeeping cancels the statistical flux seen by the common f factor; if interactions bind anyons into 2e/3 clusters or leave residual statistical flux, the single hidden Fermi surface gives way to one of the competing valley-polarized or triple-pocket states.

What would settle it

Numerically exact diagonalization of the three-valley anyon model at intermediate inter-valley repulsion should find a ground state with a single Fermi surface of charge-e/3 fermions and zero electron spectral weight; if the ground state is instead a period-three CDW metal or a triple-pocket metal, the central claim fails. Experimentally, resolving both shot noise and quantum oscillations on the same gate-tuned device near the 2/3 FCI would distinguish e/3 charge at ninefold frequency from 2e/3 clusters at conventional frequency.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A doped 1/3 FCI in the single-pocket OM regime should show e/3 shot noise, quantum oscillations at frequency 9|δ|/(2π), and longitudinal conductivity |δ|τ/(3m_f).
  • A Josephson junction in which the OM mediates between superconductors should show a 6π-periodic current-phase relation, equivalently an ac Josephson frequency ω_J = 2V/3.
  • Pairing the f fermions eliminates the topological order and yields superconductors with c_- = C_maj/2 + 3, so the chiral central charge can be tuned by the BdG band topology, producing both Abelian and non-Abelian states including c_- = -1/2.
  • The physical superconducting order parameter must carry angular momentum L = 3l, linking microscopic pairing symmetry to the observable order parameter.
  • The construction generalizes to all Laughlin fillings 1/m as Z_m orthogonal metals but is obstructed for generic Jain states by the anyon self-statistics matching condition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-pocket OM is the parent of the superconductivity observed near the 2/3 FCI, then that superconductivity is a pairing instability of a hidden e/3 Fermi surface rather than of 2e/3 anyons; this reframes the interpretation of the numerically seen c_- = -1/2 state.
  • A direct experimental discriminator between this and competing metals is the combination of e/3 shot noise and a quantum oscillation frequency three times larger than the triple-pocket candidates and nine times larger than a conventional small Fermi pocket; measuring both in one sample would be a clean test.
  • A natural next calculation is a variational or exact-diagonalization comparison of the four competing metals in an Aharonov-Casher band model, using the wave-function ansatz presented here as one trial state.
  • The matching condition points to other doped Laughlin fractions, such as the 5e/7 anyon at filling 3/7, as candidate hosts for analogous single-pocket orthogonal metals; testing that fraction would show whether the mechanism is specific to 1/3 or generic.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new metallic phase—a single-component twisted Z3 orthogonal metal—that arises upon doping the ν=1/3 fractional Chern insulator. The construction is a parton decomposition φ_v = f·g_v of the anyon field in each of the three magnetic-translation valleys: the f partons see zero net gauge flux and form a single Fermi surface of emergent charge-e/3 fermions, while the three g_v partons each fill a ν=1 IQH band; the parent U(1) gauge field is Higgsed to a Dijkgraaf-Witten twisted Z3 gauge field. From this ansatz the paper derives concrete fermiology: e/3 shot noise, quantum-oscillation frequency F̃ = 9|δ|/(2π) (Eq. 10), conductivity σ_phys = σ_f/9 + σ_{1/3} (Eq. 11), localization into a fractionalized Anderson insulator, and pairing descendants with chiral central charge c_- = C_maj/2 + 3 (Eq. 14) and physical order-parameter angular momentum L = 3l (Eq. 15), including a 6π ac Josephson effect and a claimed match to the numerically observed c_- = −1/2. A wave-function ansatz (Eqs. 18–20) is given, competing metallic states are compared, and the generalization to Laughlin (but not Jain) states is analyzed.

Significance. If the keystone flux-cancellation step is made rigorous, this is a significant and falsifiable proposal. It gives one of the cleanest constructions of a fractionalized Fermi liquid from a fractional Chern insulator, with a single hidden Fermi surface and sharp experimental signatures (e/3 shot noise, a factor-of-nine enhancement of the quantum-oscillation frequency, σ_xx = (1/3) of the conventional Drude value, and a 6π Josephson effect). The pairing route to superconductors with arbitrary chiral central charge is conceptually appealing and, if the C_maj = −3, c_- = −1/2 match survives the particle-hole bookkeeping, it would explain recent numerics. Strengths: the effective-field-theory manipulations (Eqs. 7–12, 14, 21–25) are internally consistent; the response predictions are parameter-free outputs of the ansatz rather than fits; the comparison with the three competing metallic states is informative; and the paper honestly states where a microscopic calculation is still needed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Wave-function construction, Eq. (20)] The load-bearing flux-cancellation claim is not established. Evaluating B̃_i = 2∂_{η_i}∂_{η̄_i}K̃ from Eqs. (17) and (20), each same-valley pair contributes (−1/m + 1)·2πδ = (1−1/m)·2πδ (i.e. 4π/3 for m=3) and each cross-valley pair contributes −(2π/m)δ; only the valley-configuration average vanishes, not the pointwise residual statistical flux. The text after Eq. (20) asserts 'no residual statistical flux B̃_i at long wavelengths', but the fluctuating part is O(2π), comparable to the original statistical flux, and would couple to the f Fermi surface. Since the free-Fermi-liquid form of f underlies the frequency prediction (10), the conductivity (12), and the pairing classification (14), the stability of the single-pocket OM requires either a finite-N computation of the effective Kähler metric or an argument that these residual statistical-flux fluctuations are confined or irrelevant.
  2. [Wave-function construction, Eqs. (18)–(19)] The exchange statistics of the ansatz is not reconciled with the bosonic nature of the φ_v field. The paper requires the full wave function to be bosonic under exchange of the original anyons and argues that the envelope f is fully antisymmetric. The Jastrow factor in Eq. (19) acts only within the same valley, so under exchange of two anyons in different valleys the ansatz changes sign. Unless the Kähler metric e^{−K} supplies the missing sign (or the θ/π = 1/3 monodromy of the physical anyons), the wave function in Eq. (18) does not live in the physical Hilbert space. A clarifying calculation of the braiding phase of the ansatz, including the metric, is needed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (10)] The convention for the oscillation frequency should be stated. With ħ = e = 1, a conventional spinless Fermi liquid at density δ typically has F = 2πδ, so F̃ = 9δ/(2π) appears to differ from the 'nine times' statement by a factor 4π². The factor-of-nine ratio is convention-independent and is the physical claim, but the absolute formula needs a stated convention.
  2. [Text near Eq. (11)] Typo: 'replate' should be 'relate'.
  3. [Pairing descendants, text near Eq. (14)] The claimed match to the numerically observed c_- = −1/2 via C_maj = −3 with particle-hole conjugation needs explicit bookkeeping: Eq. (14) gives c_- = +3/2 for C_maj = −3, and a naive sign flip under particle-hole conjugation gives −3/2, not −1/2. The derivation, including any background contribution from the filled Landau level of the 2/3 state, should be shown.
  4. [Fig. 1] The phase diagram omits the superconducting/pairing instability discussed in the text as the low-temperature fate of the OM. Either add the SC region or state explicitly that it is not shown.
  5. [Generalizations to other fractions] The characterization of the sparse Jain-state solutions (odd N, a, d with 2da² = ±1 mod N) is terse; a worked example beyond the quoted 5e/7 anyon at ν = 3/7 would help the reader verify the claim.
  6. [Note added] Given the asserted overlap with the independent work [50], the manuscript should state explicitly which results are claimed as novel to this submission and which are shared with [50].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the single-pocket OM is an explicit ansatz whose claimed signatures follow from the stated equations; the statistical-flux cancellation is an unproven consistency condition, not a circularity.

full rationale

The central construction is an open parton ansatz, not a hidden re-derivation of its own output. The paper states explicitly: 'We choose the ansatz with zero average a flux, so that the f fermions see no flux and can form a Fermi liquid.' From this input, the signatures (e/3 charge, \tilde F=9|δ|/(2π), σ_xx=|δ|τ/(3m_f), c_-=C_maj/2+3, L=3l, and 6π Josephson effect) are algebraic consequences of Eqs. (6)-(12) and the Appendix; no parameter is fitted to data. The mention of C_maj=-3 is a consistency example against the numerically observed c_-=-1/2, not a fitted prediction masquerading as a result. The only load-bearing step that is not fully proven is the assertion after Eq. (20) that the logarithmic singularities cancel the average statistical flux so f sees zero net field; but that is a consistency condition of the ansatz, and failure of that condition would invalidate the proposed phase—an open assumption, not a circular reduction. Self-citations (e.g., refs. 6, 18, 20, 31, 54) are background or methodological and do not carry the central claim. No circular step can be exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 8 axioms · 3 invented entities

No parameter is fitted to data in this paper; the model inputs (anyon mass m, interaction strengths V_0/V_1, pairing labels) are physical inputs and the derived signatures are genuine outputs. The two structurally new entities — the e/3 f fermion and the twisted Z_3 gauge field — carry falsifiable handles the paper states explicitly. The main load-bearing axioms are the parton ansatz itself and the flux-matching condition that lets each valley parton fill a nu=1 IQH band; both are choices, not derivations, and the paper is explicit that state selection among competing metals remains open.

free parameters (4)
  • anyon mass m
    Input from microscopics (cited to Refs 6, 31). Controls the kinetic scale T_d ~ |delta|/m and enters the conductivity prediction sigma_xx = |delta| tau/(3m_f). Not fitted in this paper, but the predictions depend on it parametrically.
  • interaction ratio r = 1 + V_1/V_0
    Controls the competition between the OM and the CDW/color-valley-locked metals. The stabilization argument (inter-valley repulsion favors the OM) is qualitative; the paper does not compute V_0, V_1 from a Hamiltonian.
  • f-pairing channel (l, C_maj) = e.g., C_maj = -3 (f-if) to match numerical c_- = -1/2
    The superconducting-descendant family is labeled by the f-pairing angular momentum l and Majorana Chern number C_maj. Selecting C_maj = -3 to match the numerically observed c_- = -1/2 is a post-hoc example, not a constraint on the OM.
  • nonuniversal constant in T_loc
    Order-one unknown in Eq. (13); the localization-scale estimate is schematic and the constant is not determined.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption Composite-boson Chern-Simons description of the nu=1/3 Laughlin FCI on a lattice, Eq. (1)
    The starting Lagrangian. Standard for FQH, but its extension to lattice anyon bands (Aharonov-Casher, Kähler potential) relies on Refs 6, 31 and is an active assumption.
  • standard math Wen-Zee coupling coefficient 3/2 fixed by the anyon orbital spin / shift
    Coefficient of alpha d omega in Eq. (1); fixed by the shift of the Laughlin state (Refs 39, 40), not fitted.
  • ad hoc to paper Parton decomposition phi_v = f·g_v with f in zero-flux Fermi liquid and each g_v in a nu=1 IQH band
    The keystone ansatz (Eqs. 4-5, 'We choose the ansatz with zero average a flux'). Everything downstream — single pocket, signatures, pairing descendants — follows from this choice.
  • domain assumption Valley-number conservation at dilute doping (intervalley scattering suppressed)
    Assumed to justify decomposing phi into three conserved valley fields phi_v below Eq. (2).
  • ad hoc to paper Flux-matching condition theta/pi = ±1/N_v mod 2 so each g_v can fill a nu=1 IQH band
    Stated as the requirement for the construction (footnote 46 and 'Generalizations to other fractions'). Not derived from microscopics; it is exactly why the construction works for Laughlin but not generic Jain states.
  • ad hoc to paper 'After averaging over valley configurations... the f fermions therefore see zero net magnetic field and no residual statistical flux' (text after Eq. 20)
    The unproven cancellation that turns the envelope f into a Fermi-liquid wavefunction. It is load-bearing for the wavefunction ansatz.
  • domain assumption Jain-anyon self-statistics theta/pi = q^2(2p-1)/(2p+1) mod 2 and valley count N_v as written (gcd(q, 2p+1))
    Stated without derivation. The N_v formula as printed is inconsistent with the 3-valley count for nu=1/3 and with the 5e/7 example (see red flags); a corrected reading N_v = (2p+1)/gcd(q,2p+1) would be consistent.
  • standard math Unimodular CS field redefinitions and U(2)_2,0 description of odd-C_maj pairing (Appendix Eqs. 21-25)
    Standard topological-field-theory manipulations; sketched rather than shown step by step.
invented entities (3)
  • f fermion — emergent charge-e/3 fermion forming the hidden single Fermi surface independent evidence
    purpose: Carries the itinerant charge of the doped anyons while braiding trivially, so the OM is a weakly interacting Fermi liquid of e/3 fermions with no electron quasiparticle weight.
    Falsifiable handles stated in the paper: e/3 shot noise, 9x quantum-oscillation frequency (Eq. 10), Drude conductivity reduced by 1/3 (Eq. 12), 6pi Josephson effect, and SC descendants with c_- = C_maj/2 + 3.
  • Twisted Z_3 (Dijkgraaf-Witten) gauge field — Higgs descendant of the parent U(1) gauge field a independent evidence
    purpose: Encodes the residual topological order of the OM; confines the g_v partons and mediates short-range repulsion among f fermions.
    Predicts a 9-fold topological degeneracy on a torus in the disordered insulating descendant and a neutral plateau transition changing c_- from 1 to 3 (Sec. 'The effects of disorder').
  • g_v valley partons — three species of nu=1 IQH fermions absorbing the fractional magnetic-translation structure independent evidence
    purpose: Absorb the 1/3 background flux and valley structure so the f sector sees zero flux; produce the valley gap and the valley-symmetric character of the state.
    Their filled-band structure fixes the c_- = 3 content of the OM and the neutral plateau-transition structure; the evidence is the same theoretical/experimental handles as the OM itself.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 115 in / 33040 out tokens · 290351 ms · 2026-08-01T23:43:12.797212+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose an unconventional metallic phase emerging on doping the $1/3$ Fractional Chern insulator, which can serve as a parent state to anyon superconductivity with arbitrary chiral central charge. It is a twisted $\mathbb{Z}_3$ orthogonal metal: a state with vanishing electron quasiparticle weight but a single well-defined Fermi surface of emergent charge-$e/3$ fermions coupled to a Dijkgraaf-Witten twisted $\mathbb{Z}_3$ gauge field. It is manifestly valley-symmetric and valley-gapped. Pairing this fractionalized Fermi surface then removes the topological order and produces a family of superconductors whose chiral central charge is directly set by the BdG band topology of the paired $e/3$ fermions, while the angular momentum of the physical order parameter is constrained to be a multiple of three. This scenario provides a route to superconducting states beyond anyon-superconductivity constructions based on $2e/3$ anyons. The metallic phase itself carries distinctive ``fractional Fermiology'' signatures: $e/3$ shot noise, anomalous quantum oscillations, and a $6\pi$ ac Josephson effect when it mediates the Josephson coupling between superconductors. We construct explicit wavefunction ansatz realizing the phase, and argue that inter-valley repulsion between anyons stabilizes this phase compared to competing states. We show that the construction extends to higher Laughlin states but not to Jain states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15274 by Ashvin Vishwanath, Eslam Khalaf, Zhaoyu Han.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A possible phase diagram as a function of doping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Charge-6e superconductivity from doping SU(3) spin liquids

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Doping SU(3) spin liquids can yield charge-6e superconductors, including a non-Abelian chiral version with h/(6e) vortices.

  2. Coloring in anyon superconductivity

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Doping the ν=2/3 FQAH state produces a unifying 'quark metal' of charge-e/3 fermions whose superconducting and ferromagnetic instabilities reproduce and extend the known zoo of anyon-driven superconductors.

  3. Color superconductors and holon metals from doping a Fractional Chern insulator

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Doping a C=1/3 fractional Chern insulator can produce charge-2e superconductors and holon metals described by a nine-pocket SU(3) parton theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 16 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted MoTe 2, Nature622, 63 (2023), arXiv:2304.08470 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.-Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Nature622, 74 (2023), arXiv:2308.02657 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and T. Li, Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. X13, 031037 (2023), arXiv:2308.06177 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature622, 69 (2023), arXiv:2305.00973 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, Y. Su, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, L. Lu, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, J. Lin, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, 7 S. Lei, X. Liu, and T. Li, Signatures of unconventional superconductivity near reentrant and fractional quan- tum anomalous hall insulators (2026), arXiv:2504.06972 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Z. Yan, Q. Li, T. Soejima, and E. Khalaf, Anyon dis- persion in aharonov-casher bands and implications for twisted MoTe2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15863 (2025), arXiv:2512.15863 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Schleith, T

    M.-L. Schleith, T. Soejima, and E. Khalaf, Anyon dispersion from non-uniform magnetic field on the sphere, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.11211 (2025), arXiv:2506.11211 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    K. Iyer, A. Feuerpfeil, V. Cr´ epel, N. Regnault, and C. Mora, Dispersion of anyon bloch bands, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.24859 (2026), arXiv:2604.24859 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Gon¸ calves, J

    M. Gon¸ calves, J. F. Mendez-Valderrama, J. Herzog- Arbeitman, J. Yu, X. Xu, D. Xiao, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Spinless and spinful charge excitations in moir´ e fractional chern insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 196503 (2026)

    2026

  10. [10]

    E. M. Spanton, A. A. Zibrov, H. Zhou, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Observation of fractional chern insulators in a van der waals heterostructure, Science360, 62 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aan8458

    doi:10.1126/science.aan8458 2018

  11. [11]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, et al., Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature600, 439 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    R. B. Laughlin, Superconducting ground state of non- interacting particles obeying fractional statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2677 (1988)

    1988

  13. [13]

    R. B. Laughlin, The relationship between high- temperature superconductivity and the fractional quan- tum hall effect, Science242, 525 (1988)

    1988

  14. [14]

    A. L. Fetter, C. B. Hanna, and R. B. Laughlin, Random- phase approximation in the fractional-statistics gas, Phys. Rev. B39, 9679 (1989)

    1989

  15. [15]

    Y.-H. Chen, F. Wilczek, E. Witten, and B. I. Halperin, On anyon superconductivity, International Journal of Modern Physics B3, 1001 (1989)

    1989

  16. [16]

    Wilczek, ed., Fractional Statistics and Anyon Superconductivity (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990)

    F. Wilczek, ed., Fractional Statistics and Anyon Superconductivity (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990)

    1990

  17. [17]

    Z. D. Shi and T. Senthil, Doping a fractional quan- tum anomalous hall insulator, Phys. Rev. X15, 031069 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    P. A. Nosov, Z. Han, and E. Khalaf, Anyon superconduc- tivity and plateau transitions in doped fractional quan- tum anomalous hall insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 106501 (2026)

    2026

  19. [19]

    Divic, V

    S. Divic, V. Cr´ epel, T. Soejima, X.-Y. Song, A. J. Millis, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Vishwanath, Anyon superconductivity from topological criticality in a hofstadter–hubbard model, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences122, e2426680122 (2025), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2426680122

    doi:10.1073/pnas.2426680122 2025

  20. [20]

    Z. Han, T. Wang, Z. Dong, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Vish- wanath, Anyon superfluidity of excitons in quantum hall bilayers, Phys. Rev. X16, 021044 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    Z. D. Shi, C. Zhang, and S. Todadri, Doping lattice non-abelian quantum hall states, SciPost Phys.19, 150 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Z.-D. Fan, A. Vishwanath, and Z. Wang, Hidden weak- pairing superconductivity of non-interacting anyons obeying 1 3 statistics (2026), arXiv:2605.19036 [cond- mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    Lotriˇ c and S

    T. Lotriˇ c and S. H. Simon, Phases of itinerant anyons in laughlin’s quantum hall states on a lattice (2026), arXiv:2603.22389 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Z. D. Shi and T. Senthil, Superconductivity and non- fermi liquid metals in a charge-1/3 anyon fluid (2026), arXiv:2606.20403 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Pichler, C

    F. Pichler, C. Kuhlenkamp, M. Knap, and A. Vish- wanath, Microscopic mechanism of anyon superconduc- tivity emerging from fractional chern insulators, Newton 2(2026)

    2026

  26. [26]

    Z. D. Shi and T. Senthil, Anyon delocalization transitions out of a disordered fractional quantum anomalous hall insulator, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences122, e2520608122 (2025), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2520608122

    doi:10.1073/pnas.2520608122 2025

  27. [27]

    Z. D. Shi and T. Senthil, Non-abelian topological super- conductivity from melting abelian fractional chern insu- lators (2025), arXiv:2512.17996 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Y.-H. Zhang, Holon metal, charge-density-wave and chi- ral superconductor from doping fractional chern insula- tor and su(3)1 chiral spin liquid (2025), arXiv:2506.00110 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Gattu and J

    M. Gattu and J. K. Jain, Molecular anyons in the frac- tional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 236601 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Q. Xu, G. Ji, Y. Wang, H. Q. Trung, and B. Yang, Dy- namics of anyon clusters in fractional quantum hall fluids, Phys. Rev. B112, 235112 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Q. Li, P. A. Nosov, T. Wang, and E. Khalaf, Bound states of anyons: a geometric quantization approach (2026), arXiv:2603.24701 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Wang and M

    T. Wang and M. P. Zaletel, Anyon molecules in fractional quantum hall states, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.09798 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Wang and M

    T. Wang and M. P. Zaletel, Chiral superconductivity near a fractional chern insulator (2025), arXiv:2507.07921 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Guerci, A

    D. Guerci, A. Abouelkomsan, and L. Fu, From fraction- alization to chiral topological superconductivity in a flat chern band, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 186601 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Wang, Topological superconductivity from abelian fractional chern insulators (2026), arXiv:2605.29034 [cond-mat.str-el]

    T. Wang, Topological superconductivity from abelian fractional chern insulators (2026), arXiv:2605.29034 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Nandkishore, M

    R. Nandkishore, M. A. Metlitski, and T. Senthil, Orthog- onal metals: The simplest non-fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B86, 045128 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    Gazit, M

    S. Gazit, M. Randeria, and A. Vishwanath, Emergent dirac fermions and broken symmetries in confined and deconfined phases of z2 gauge theories, Nature Physics 13, 484 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    S. C. Zhang, T. H. Hansson, and S. Kivelson, Effective- field-theory model for the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 82 (1989)

    1989

  39. [39]

    X. G. Wen and A. Zee, Shift and spin vector: New topo- logical quantum numbers for the hall fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 953 (1992)

    1992

  40. [40]

    G. Y. Cho, Y. You, and E. Fradkin, Geometry of frac- tional quantum hall fluids, Phys. Rev. B90, 115139 (2014)

    2014

  41. [41]

    Cheng and N

    M. Cheng and N. Seiberg, Lieb-schultz-mattis, luttinger, and ’t hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems, Sci- 8 Post Phys.15, 051 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    This distinction does not change the response formulas used below, but it is useful for tracking the spin-charge relation and the statistics of the resulting anyons [51–54]

    Strictly,ais a spin C connection: its elementary sources are fermions, and aπholonomy on a non-contractible cycle changes the associated fermion boundary condition. This distinction does not change the response formulas used below, but it is useful for tracking the spin-charge relation and the statistics of the resulting anyons [51–54]

  43. [43]

    Senthil and M

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher,z 2 gauge theory of electron fractionalization in strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B62, 7850 (2000)

    2000

  44. [44]

    Senthil and M

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Fractionalization and con- finement in theU(1) andZ 2 gauge theories of strongly correlated systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.34, L119 (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0006500

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [45]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  46. [46]

    However, for Jain states this can never happen

    More generally, the anyon self-statistical flux number can be 1/(kN v) mod 2 withk >1, which corresponds to putting eachg v toν=kIQH. However, for Jain states this can never happen

  47. [47]

    Aharonov and A

    Y. Aharonov and A. Casher, Ground state of a spin- 1/2 charged particle in a two-dimensional magnetic field, Physical Review A19, 2461 (1979)

    1979

  48. [48]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Vor- texability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B108, 205144 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    S. A. Trugman and S. Kivelson, Exact results for the fractional quantum hall effect with general interactions, Phys. Rev. B31, 5280 (1985)

    1985

  50. [50]

    Senthil, Fractionalized metals from doped anyons: Application to tmote2 (2026), arXiv:2607.11484 [cond- mat.str-el]

    T. Senthil, Fractionalized metals from doped anyons: Application to tmote2 (2026), arXiv:2607.11484 [cond- mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    Seiberg, T

    N. Seiberg, T. Senthil, C. Wang, and E. Witten, A duality web in 2+1 dimensions and condensed matter physics, Annals of Physics374, 395 (2016)

    2016

  52. [52]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Gapped boundary phases of topological insulators via weak coupling, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2016, 12C101 (2016), https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article- pdf/2016/12/12C101/9620064/ptw083.pdf

    2016

  53. [53]

    Senthil, D

    T. Senthil, D. T. Son, C. Wang, and C. Xu, Duality be- tween (2+1)d quantum critical points, Physics Reports 827, 1 (2019), duality between (2+1)d quantum critical points

    2019

  54. [54]

    Han and J.-Y

    Z. Han and J.-Y. Chen, Fractional hall conductivity and spin-c structure in solvable lattice hamiltonians, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 1 (2023). Appendix Field theory of the pairing descendants For even Majorana Chern number,C maj = 2N, the pairedfsector is represented by L[f;a]→ 2 2π βd(a+lω) +NCS[a, g].(21) Substitution into Eq. (6) gives L= 2 2...

    2023