Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 69 references

In a rotating NED black hole, charge and NED strength leave opposite, distinguishable marks on shadow and disk emission.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 03:36 UTC pith:IMHXVM2Q

load-bearing objection Competent but narrow imaging paper for a rotating NED metric; the qualitative trends are fine, but the shadow-radius plot looks mis-scaled by ~100x and the metric's limit claims are wrong. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2607.23093 v1 pith:IMHXVM2Q submitted 2026-07-25 gr-qc

Optical Appearance of a Rotating Black Hole in Nonlinear Electrodynamics Surrounded by Thin Accretion Disks

Abdul Malik Sultan , Manahil Ali , Muhammad Israr Aslam , Zi-Chao Lin This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C1083C50
keywords black hole shadownonlinear electrodynamicsthin accretion diskray tracingphoton ringredshift distributionrotating black holestrong-field gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether a rotating black hole modified by nonlinear electrodynamics (NED) can be told apart from an ordinary rotating charged black hole by how it looks. Using backward ray tracing with two illumination models—a celestial sphere and a geometrically thin accretion disk—the authors compute shadow contours, photon rings, direct and lensed disk images, redshift maps, and emission bands for both prograde and retrograde flows. They establish that the NED parameter β and the electric charge Q have opposite effects on the image: increasing β enlarges the shadow and makes it rounder, while increasing Q shrinks the shadow and distorts it. Redshifted emission dominates the disk images, with blueshift confined near the photon ring.

Core claim

For fixed spin and observer inclination, as the NED parameter β grows, the shadow radius increases and distortion decreases; as the charge Q grows, the shadow shrinks, becomes more deformed, and the photon ring moves inward. In prograde and retrograde flows the redshifted disk emission dominates the image, while blueshifted emission stays near the photon ring. The paper concludes that Q and β leave distinct signatures that could help identify rotating NED black holes in future observations.

What carries the argument

The analysis uses the rotating NED metric, whose horizon function carries the NED correction as a 1/r term governed by β. Null geodesics are assumed separable, giving a Carter-type constant and impact parameters that trace the shadow. Backward ray tracing with a fisheye camera, a thin-disk emission model with an ISCO boundary, and redshift factors for Keplerian and plunging matter produce direct and lensed images, redshift maps, and emission bands.

Load-bearing premise

The whole analysis inherits the rotating NED metric from an earlier derivation without re-deriving it; if that metric is not an exact solution or if null geodesics do not separate, the computed images are not the real ones.

What would settle it

Feed the proposed NED Lagrangian into the field equations and check whether the rotating line element (2.1) satisfies them; if not, or if a numerical integration of the full geodesic equation reveals no Carter-type constant, the shadow and disk images would shift.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At fixed spin and inclination, shadow radius rises with β while distortion falls; charge Q acts oppositely.
  • Increasing β expands the photon ring and emission bands; increasing Q compacts the image and pulls emission inward.
  • Redshifted emission dominates both prograde and retrograde disk images, with blueshift near the photon ring.
  • Retrograde flow yields a hat-like, more asymmetric shadow and amplifies the influence of β.
  • Shadow size and distortion, combined with redshift maps, provide a route to estimating (Q, β).

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because β and Q push shadow size and distortion in opposite directions, size alone cannot fix both; combining size with distortion and redshift asymmetry is necessary.
  • The predictions depend on the adopted rotating NED metric; a direct derivation from the NED Lagrangian would test its validity and separability.
  • The redshift dominance suggests the blueshifted crescent near the photon ring is a robust target for next-generation interferometry.
  • The hat-like shadow under retrograde flow may indicate the sense of disk rotation relative to spin.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the optical appearance of a rotating black-hole spacetime in nonlinear electrodynamics (NED), using two illumination models: a distant celestial sphere and a thin accretion disk. The metric is borrowed from Ref. [30] and written in Kerr-Newman-like form with a modified Δ(r). The authors compute horizon structure, photon-region impact parameters, shadow contours, and the observables R_d and δ_d, then produce ray-traced images for prograde and retrograde accretion flows, together with redshift maps and direct/lensed emission bands. The central claim is that increasing the NED parameter β enlarges the shadow and reduces its distortion, while increasing the charge Q shrinks the shadow and increases its deformation, so that Q and β leave distinguishable signatures in high-resolution images.

Significance. If the underlying metric is valid and the printed equations are correct, the paper is a useful parameter-space study of a specific rotating NED spacetime. Its qualitative conclusions are internally consistent across the shadow contours, the R_d/δ_d plots, and the disk images. The analysis is not circular: it involves no parameter fitting, and the shadow and image quantities follow directly from the metric and geodesic integration. The use of EHT-motivated emissivity parameters is a reasonable first approximation, although it is imported from Kerr models. The main value is as a reference for future shadow-image comparisons in beyond-Kerr spacetimes, provided the computational details and the erroneous printed equations are corrected.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.7)] The angular potential is written as Θ(θ)=Ĵ+a²Ê²−L̂² csc²θ cos²θ. For the metric (2.1), with R written as in Eq. (2.7) using Ĵ+(L̂−aÊ)², the correct separated angular equation is Θ(θ)=Ĵ+a²Ê² cos²θ−L̂² cot²θ. The term a²Ê² must carry cos²θ. As printed, the equation is not a valid separation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and, if used in the ray-tracing integration (2.6), would change the θ-motion. This is load-bearing because all shadow and disk images are obtained from these geodesic equations. The authors must correct this equation and confirm that the numerical code used the corrected form.
  2. [Sec. 2, limit statements after Eq. (2.2)] Three statements about limits are incorrect. (i) 'when C=0, the solution reduces to the Reissner-Nordström BH' is false for a≠0: Eq. (2.2) gives Δ=r²−2Mr+a²+Q², which is Kerr-Newman. (ii) 'in the absence of electric charge Q, the rotating NED solution reduces to the Kerr geometry' is false with C=κ=1: Δ=r²−2Mr+a²−1/2+1/(β^{1/4}r), which is not Kerr. (iii) 'for both Q=0 and a=0, it further simplifies to the Schwarzschild spacetime' is also false because the NED terms remain. These should be corrected or qualified; as written they mislead the reader about which metric is actually being studied.
  3. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.7)-(4.8)] The observed intensity formula (4.7) contains an emissivity K_n, but Eq. (4.8) defines τ_n=exp(τ₁g²+τ₂g). The relation between K_n and τ_n is never stated. If K_n is meant to equal this exponential, the notation must be fixed; otherwise the intensity is undefined. Also, S_obs in Eq. (4.7) is called a 'photon frequency' in the text, although it is the specific intensity. This section needs a careful rewriting for reproducibility.
  4. [Sec. 4, prograde vs retrograde flow] The paper does not specify how the retrograde accretion-flow four-velocity is obtained. Eq. (4.4) gives a single expression for Ω; for a Kerr-like spacetime there are two circular-orbit branches, and the retrograde case requires choosing the other sign or reversing the spin parameter. Without an explicit prescription, Figs. 10–13 are not reproducible. The authors should state the convention used for retrograde motion.
  5. [Sec. 3, Fig. 3 and numerical method] The numerical values of R_d and δ_d in Fig. 3 are of order 0.05–0.07, whereas the shadow contours in Fig. 2 have radius about 5 in x/M,y/M. If Fig. 3 reports angular units because r_obs=100M, this must be stated explicitly and consistently with Eq. (2.13). In addition, no resolution, ray count, integration tolerance, or convergence test is reported. Given that the plotted changes in R_d and δ_d are small, the claimed monotonic trends need numerical verification. Please provide convergence checks or error estimates.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are frequent typos and grammatical errors: 'for for', 'the c charge parameter', 'Fig. 4 Specifically', 'expressed as τ_n is defined as', and repeated 'n th'. The manuscript needs a careful language edit.
  2. [Sec. 5] The phrase 'which is consistent with Event Horizon Telescope results at 230GHz' is an overstatement. The paper uses emissivity parameters from an EHT modeling paper but does not compare the calculated images to EHT observations. Rephrase to avoid implying a direct consistency test.
  3. [Sec. 2] The choice of parameter ranges 0<β≤2 and 0<Q<1 is presented without justification. A brief explanation of how these ranges were selected (e.g., horizon existence) would be helpful.
  4. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.13)] The definition of δ_d is grammatically tangled: 'the distortion parameter δ_d is introduced to characterize the departure ... is defined as'. Please rewrite for clarity.
  5. [References] Some reference entries are incomplete or inconsistent (e.g., Ref. [2] has an incomplete volume/page and Ref. [63] has an odd page format). Please verify the bibliography.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the shadow/disk images are computed from an adopted metric and standard geodesic ray tracing, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims — that increasing β enlarges the shadow while reducing distortion and that increasing Q shrinks the shadow while increasing deformation — are obtained by solving the null-geodesic equations (2.6)-(2.7) and ray tracing in the metric (2.1)-(2.2). The metric is taken from Ref. [30] and the emissivity constants from Ref. [63], but these are external inputs, not outputs of the present analysis. No parameter is fitted to the computed shadow radii, distortion parameters, redshift maps, or images, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction structure. The self-citations that appear (e.g., Refs. [42], [50], [53], [54]) are methodological or contextual and are not load-bearing for the main result; the Hamilton-Jacobi separability of the photon motion is assumed from the adopted metric rather than derived, which is a correctness or validity concern about an external input, not a circular derivation. The metric's stated limit behaviors contain internal inconsistencies (e.g., the C=0 and Q=0 limits as written do not match Kerr-Newman or Kerr in Eq. (2.2)), but this is an accuracy problem, not a circularity problem: it does not make any prediction equivalent to the input by construction. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained from the adopted spacetime to the optical observables, so the circularity score is low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entity. Its extra degrees of freedom are the two emissivity-shape constants (borrowed from Kerr EHT models), the C and κ choices in the imported metric, and the standard thin-disk modeling assumptions. The central shadow results depend mainly on the imported metric and separability; the disk images additionally depend on the emissivity profile.

free parameters (4)
  • C = 1
    Dimensionless integration constant in Δ(r), Eq. (2.2); the authors state it 'has no direct physical interpretation' but fix C=1. It changes horizon structure and all subsequent images.
  • κ = 1
    Gravitational coupling constant appearing in C^2κ^2 and C^{3/2}κ^2 terms of Δ(r); fixed to 1 by hand rather than by data.
  • τ1 = -1/2
    Emissivity profile shape parameter, Eq. (4.8), taken from Ref. [63]'s Kerr EHT model; not derived for the NED metric.
  • τ2 = -2
    Emissivity profile shape parameter, Eq. (4.8), same provenance as τ1.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The rotating NED metric Eq. (2.1)-(2.2) is a valid spacetime; its derivation in Ref. [30] is correct.
    Section 2 states the metric is 'adopted from [55] by applying the modified Newman-Janis algorithm' and that the derivation is not repeated. All shadow and disk results inherit this unverified premise.
  • domain assumption Null geodesics in this metric separate in Hamilton-Jacobi form with a Carter constant Ĵ.
    Eqs. (2.4)-(2.7) assume separability of I into r- and θ-parts; the paper does not prove the spacetime admits this symmetry. If false, the computed photon trajectories and shadows are invalid.
  • domain assumption Accretion matter is a collisionless, electrically neutral test fluid on equatorial circular geodesics with the given ISCO/plunge model.
    Section 4 adopts the standard relativistic thin-disk model and Eqs. (4.1)-(4.6); this is a physically motivated but unvalidated modeling choice for this spacetime.
  • ad hoc to paper The emissivity profile K_n = exp(τ1 g^2 + τ2 g) with τ1=-1/2, τ2=-2, appropriate for EHT 230 GHz Kerr images, transfers unchanged to the NED black hole.
    Eq. (4.8) and surrounding text import constants from [63] without deriving them from the NED metric or disk physics; the disk images and redshift maps depend on this choice.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19259 in / 15582 out tokens · 149595 ms · 2026-08-01T03:36:14.305920+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This work investigates the optical appearance of a rotating black hole (BH) in nonlinear electrodynamics (NED) using two illumination models, namely a celestial sphere and a thin accretion disk. The BH images are constructed using a backward ray-tracing method together with a fisheye camera model. We examine the effects of the electric charge $Q$ and the NED parameter $\beta$ on the event horizon, shadow, photon ring, and optical appearance for both prograde and retrograde accretion flows. The results indicate that an increase in $\beta$ leads to a larger shadow radius with reduced distortion, whereas increasing $Q$ decreases the shadow size and enhances its deformation. These features are further quantified through the shadow radius and distortion parameter. We also analyze the direct and lensed images of the thin accretion disk, together with their corresponding redshift distributions and emission bands. The redshifted emission is found to dominate the observed images, while the blueshifted region is confined to the vicinity of the photon ring. Our results demonstrate that both $Q$ and $\beta$ leave distinct signatures on the optical appearance of rotating NED BHs, providing useful insights for future high-resolution observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23093 by Abdul Malik Sultan, Manahil Ali, Muhammad Israr Aslam, Zi-Chao Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The behavior of the event horizons of the rotating NED BH for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The shadow contours of the rotating NED BH are shown for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Shadow images of a rotating BH in NED field for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Physical interpretation of the four characteristic curves for the rotating BH in NED field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Optical images of the rotating BH in NED field under prograde accretion flow for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The redshift distribution of direct images for the rotating BH in NED field is presented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The redshift distribution of lensed images of the rotating BH in NED field is presented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The lensing bands of the rotating BH in NED field is presented for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Optical images of the rotating BH in NED field under retrograde accretion flow for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The redshift distribution of direct images for the rotating BH in NED field is presented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The redshift distribution of lensed images of the rotating BH in NED field is presented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: The lensing bands of the rotating BH in NED field are examined for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION General Relativity (GR) is the prevailing theory of gravitation, describing gravity as a manifes- tation of the curvature of spacetime generated by the distribution of mass and energy [1]. Among its most remarkable predictions are BHs, which are compact astrophysical objects with gravita- tional fields so intense that no matter or radiation c...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Since the complete derivation of the metric and its associated geometric properties has already been pre- sented in detail in Ref

    ROT A TING BLACK HOLE SOLUTION IN NONLINEAR ELECTRODYNAMICS The rotating BH solution in NED employed in this work is adopted from [55] by applying the modified Newman-Janis algorithm to the corresponding static NED spacetime [56, 57]. Since the complete derivation of the metric and its associated geometric properties has already been pre- sented in detail...

  3. [3]

    OPTICAL IMAGES IN THE BACKGROUND OF CELESTIAL LIGHT SPHERE To examine the optical appearance of the rotating BH in the presence of a celestial background, we utilize the backward ray-tracing method to reconstruct the observed shadow. In this approach, photons are numerically propagated from the observer’s image plane toward the BH, allowing only those tra...

  4. [4]

    In this section, we examine the properties of thin accretion disks in the spacetime of a rotating BH arising from NED

    BLACK HOLE IMAGING WITH THIN ACCRETION DISK EMISSION The investigation of thin accretion disks around BHs provides an effective framework for under- standing the interaction between strong gravitational fields and the surrounding radiating matter. In this section, we examine the properties of thin accretion disks in the spacetime of a rotating BH arising ...

  5. [5]

    We examine the shadow observed by a distant observer and analyzed how the size of the shadow is influenced by the relevant parameters of the model

    RESUL TS AND DISCUSSION In this work, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the optical characteristics of a rotating BH in the NED field, such as the geometrical shape of the shadow radius, visual signatures of shadow images in the background of a celestial light sphere and a thin accretion disk, which is consistent with Event Horizon Telescope results at...

  6. [6]

    Einstein, Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin

    A. Einstein, Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Die Feldgle- ichungun der Gravitation25, 844 (1915)

    1915

  7. [7]

    F. W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington and C. Davidson, A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun’s Gravitational Field. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A220, 0009 (1920)

    1920

  8. [8]

    Schwarzschild, On the Gravitational Field of a Mass Point According to Einstein’s Theory

    K. Schwarzschild, On the Gravitational Field of a Mass Point According to Einstein’s Theory. Sitzungs- berichte der K¨ oniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 189 (1916)

    1916

  9. [9]

    Reissner, On the Gravitational Field of an Electrically Charged Mass Point

    H. Reissner, On the Gravitational Field of an Electrically Charged Mass Point. Ann. der Phys.355, 106 (1916)

    1916

  10. [10]

    Nordstr¨ om, On the Energy of the Gravitational Field in Einstein’s Theory

    G. Nordstr¨ om, On the Energy of the Gravitational Field in Einstein’s Theory. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings20, 1238 (1918)

    1918

  11. [11]

    R. P. Kerr, Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics. Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 237 (1963)

    1963

  12. [12]

    E. T. Newman et al., Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass. J. Math. Phys.6, 918 (1965)

    1965

  13. [13]

    R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics. Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 237 (1963)

    1963

  14. [14]

    Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes

    S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes. (Oxford University Press, 1983). 25

    1983

  15. [15]

    J. M. Bardeen, Timelike and Null Geodesics in the Kerr Metric. Gordon and Breach 215 (1973)

    1973

  16. [16]

    Bambi, Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity (Springer, 2017)

    C. Bambi, Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity (Springer, 2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    P. V. P. Cunha and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review. Gen. Relativ. Gravit.50, 42 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    Perlick and O

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies. Phys. Rep. 947, 1 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Born and L

    M. Born and L. Infeld, On the quantization of the new field equations I. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A147 522 (1934)

    1934

  20. [20]

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Nonlinear Electrodynamics from Quantized Strings. Phys. Lett. B 163, 123 (1985)

    1985

  21. [21]

    A. A. Tseytlin, Vector Field Effective Action in the Open Superstring Theory. Nucl. Phys. B276, 391 (1986) [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B291, 876 (1987)]

    1986

  22. [22]

    E. I. Guendelman, The no scale nonlinear sigma model, magnetic charge, the cosmological constant, compactification and symmetry breaking. Class. Quant. Grav.12, 1893 (1995)

    1995

  23. [23]

    Ayon-Beato and A

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrody- namics. Phys. Rev. Lett. B80, 5056 (1998)

    1998

  24. [24]

    Ayon-Beato and A

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, New regular black hole solution from nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. B464, 25 (1999)

    1999

  25. [25]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D63, 044005 (2001)

    2001

  26. [26]

    Dymnikova, Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity

    I. Dymnikova, Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity. Class. Quant. Grav.21, 4417 (2004)

    2004

  27. [27]

    G. J. Olmo and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Palatinif(R) Black Holes in Nonlinear Electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D84, 124059 (2011)

    2011

  28. [28]

    Sheykhi and A

    A. Sheykhi and A. Kazemi, Higher dimensional dilaton black holes in the presence of exponential nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D90, 044028 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    S. H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah and S. Panahiyan, Einstein-Born-Infeld-Massive Gravity: adS-Black Hole Solutions and their Thermodynamical properties. JHEP11, 157 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    Z. Y. Fan and X. Wang, Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity. Phys. Rev. D94, 124027 (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    S. I. Kruglov, Born–Infeld-type electrodynamics and magnetic black holes. Ann. Phys.383, 550 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    X. M. Kuang, B. Liu and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Nonlinear electrodynamics AdS black hole and related phenomena in the extended thermodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C78, 840 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    S. I. Kruglov, Dyonic and magnetized black holes based on nonlinear electrodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 250 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    Bokulic, I

    A. Bokulic, I. Smolic, T. Juric, Black hole thermodynamics in the presence of nonlinear electromagnetic fields. Phys. Rev. D103, 124059 (2021). 26

    2021

  35. [35]

    Zubair, M

    M. Zubair, M. A. Raza, G. Abbas, Optical features of rotating black hole with nonlinear electrody- namics. Eur. Phys. J. C82, 948 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    M. A. Raza, F. Sarikulov, J. Rayimbaevc, M. Zubair, B. Ahmedove, Z. Stuchlıkf, Shadow of novel rotating black holes in GR coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics and constraints from EHT results. Phys. Dark Uni.44, 101488 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    G. I. R´ ois, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, T. Harko, Charged black hole solutions inf(R, T) gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D111, 124044 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Liang, D

    J. Liang, D. Liu, Z. W. Long, Quasinormal modes and greybody factors of black holes corrected by nonlinear electrodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C86, 17 (2026)

    2026

  39. [39]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. Astron. Astrophys24, 337 (1973)

    1973

  40. [40]

    I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne, Astrophysics and black holes, in Black Holes, edited by C. De Witt and B. De Witt (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1973)

    1973

  41. [41]

    D. N. Page and K. S. Thorne, Disk-accretion onto a black hole. Time-averaged structure of an accretion disk. Astrophys. J191, 499 (1974)

    1974

  42. [42]

    Akiyama et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole. Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    Akiyama et al., First M87 event horizon telescope results

    K. Akiyama et al., First M87 event horizon telescope results. IV. Imaging the central supermassive black hole. Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L4 (2019)

    2019

  44. [44]

    Akiyama et al., Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First SagittariusA ∗ Event Horizon Tele- scope Results

    K. Akiyama et al., Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First SagittariusA ∗ Event Horizon Tele- scope Results. I. The Shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way. Astro- phys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Akiyama et al., Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First SagittariusA∗ Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama et al., Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First SagittariusA∗ Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the black hole metric, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L17 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    P. V. P. Cunha, et al, Shadows of Kerr Black Holes with Scalar Hair. Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 211102 (2015)

    2015

  47. [47]

    X. X. Zeng, C. Yu. Yang, M. I. Aslam, R. Saleem and S. Aslam, Kerr-like black hole surrounded by cold dark matter halo: the shadow images and EHT constraints. JCAP08, 066 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    C. Yu. Yang, M. I. Aslam, X. X. Zeng and R. Saleem, Shadow images of a Ghosh-Kumar rotating black hole illuminated by spherical light sources and a thin accretion disk. JHEP46, 100345 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    S. E. Gralla, D. E. Holz, and R. M. Wald, Black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings. Phys. Rev.D100, 024018 (2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    Hou, et al, Image of a Kerr-Melvin black hole with a thin accretion disk

    Y. Hou, et al, Image of a Kerr-Melvin black hole with a thin accretion disk. Phys. Rev. D106, 064058 (2022)

    2022

  51. [51]

    S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu, Extended Thermodynamics and Microstructures of Four-Dimensional Charged Gauss-Bonnet Black Hole in AdS Space. Phys. Rev. D101, 104018 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    Hegde et al., Null Geodesics and Thermodynamic Phase Transition of Four-Dimensional Gauss- 27 Bonnet AdS Black Hole

    K. Hegde et al., Null Geodesics and Thermodynamic Phase Transition of Four-Dimensional Gauss- 27 Bonnet AdS Black Hole. Ann. Phys429, 168461 (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    C. Liu, T. Zhu and Q. Wu, Thin accretion disk around a four-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black hole. Chin. Phys. C45, 015105 (2021)

    2021

  54. [54]

    X. X. Zeng, M. I. Aslam, R. Saleem, The optical appearance of charged four-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet black hole with strings cloud and non-commutative geometry surrounded by various accretions profiles. Eur. Phys. J. C83, 129 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    M. I. Aslam, S. Hussain, H. T. Naseer, A. M. Sultan, Consequences of Thermal Fluctuations and Shadows of Nonsingular Black Hole in 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Gravity.Forts. der Phys.74, e70107 (2026)

    2026

  56. [56]

    X. X. Zeng, C. Yu. Yang, M. I. Aslam and R. Saleem, Probing Horndeski gravity via Kerr black hole: Insights from thin accretion disks and shadows with EHT observation. JHEP51, 100540 (2026)

    2026

  57. [57]

    X. X. Zeng, H. Ye, M. I. Aslam, and R. Saleem, Shadows and Polarization Images of a Four-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet Black Hole Irradiated by a Thick Accretion Disk. arXiv:2603.07185 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    M. I. Aslam, M. Ali, A. M. Sultan, X. X. Zeng, S. Hussain, Visual Characteristics of a Rotating Black Hole in 4DEinstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity with Thin Accretion Disk Under EHT Constraints. arXiv:2604.18628 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    A. M. Sultan, M. I. Aslam, M. Ali, and D. Su, Testing the Nature of Rotating Black Hole Shadows Surrounded by a Thin Accretion Disk within Rastall Gravity. arXiv:2606.15727 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    S. I. Kruglov, Nonlinear electrodynamics and black holes. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.12, 1550073 (2015)

    2015

  61. [61]

    Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification

    M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification. Phys. Rev. D90, 064041 (2014)

    2014

  62. [62]

    Azreg-A ¨ ınou, From static to rotating to conformal static solutions: rotating imperfect fluid worm- holes with (out) electric or magnetic field

    M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, From static to rotating to conformal static solutions: rotating imperfect fluid worm- holes with (out) electric or magnetic field. Eur. Phys. J. C74, 2865 (2014)

    2014

  63. [63]

    Javed, J

    W. Javed, J. Abbas, Ali ¨Ovg¨ un, Deflection angle of photon from magnetized black hole and effect of nonlinear electrodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C79, 694 (2019)

    2019

  64. [64]

    Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes

    S. Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. (1998)

    1998

  65. [65]

    Hu, et al, QED effect on a black hole shadow

    Z. Hu, et al, QED effect on a black hole shadow. Phys. Rev. D103, 044057 (2021)

    2021

  66. [66]

    Z. Hu, Z. Zhong, P. C. Li, M. Guo, and B. Chen, QED effects on Kerr black hole shadows immersed in uniform magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. D104, 104028 (2021)

    2021

  67. [67]

    Hioki and K

    K. Hioki and K. I. Maeda, Measurement of the Kerr spin parameter by observation of a compact object’s shadow. Phys. Rev. D80, 024042 (2009)

    2009

  68. [68]

    Chael, M

    A. Chael, M. D. Johnson, and A. Lupsasca, Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon. Astrophys. J.9186, (2021)

    2021

  69. [69]

    C. T. Cunningham, The effects of redshifts and focusing on the spectrum of an accretion disk around a Kerr black hole, Astrophys. J.202, 788 (1975)

    1975