REVIEW 5 cited by
The density and peculiar velocity fields of nearby galaxies
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The density and peculiar velocity fields of nearby galaxies
read the original abstract
We review the quantitative science that can be and has been done with redshift and peculiar velocity surveys of galaxies in the nearby universe. After a brief background setting the cosmological context for this work, the first part of this review focuses on redshift surveys. The practical issues of how redshift surveys are carried out, and how one turns a distribution of galaxies into a smoothed density field, are discussed. Then follows a description of major redshift surveys that have been done, and the local cosmography out to 8,000 km/s that they have mapped. We then discuss in some detail the various quantitative cosmological tests that can be carried out with redshift data. The second half of this review concentrates on peculiar velocity studies, beginning with a thorough review of existing techniques. After discussing the various biases which plague peculiar velocity work, we survey quantitative analyses done with peculiar velocity surveys alone, and finally with the combination of data from both redshift and peculiar velocity surveys. The data presented rule out the standard Cold Dark Matter model, although several variants of Cold Dark Matter with more power on large scales fare better. All the data are consistent with the hypothesis that the initial density field had a Gaussian distribution, although one cannot rule out broad classes of non-Gaussian models. Comparison of the peculiar velocity and density fields constrains the Cosmological Density Parameter. The results here are consistent with a flat universe with mild biasing of the galaxies relative to dark matter, although open universe models are by no means ruled out.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Closing the Observational Gap in Cosmic Dynamics: AI-Enabled Reconstruction of the Universe's Vorticity and Rotational Flow Morphology
AI trained on LambdaCDM simulations reconstructs the cosmic vorticity field from SDSS galaxies, revealing coherent vortical structures consistent with the standard model and correcting redshift-space distortions.
-
Impact of inhomogeneous curvature on growth rate measurements from magnitude fluctuations
Full-GR simulations find that inhomogeneous curvature produces only sub-dominant systematic offsets in growth-rate measurements from magnitude fluctuations at z ≲ 0.2 relative to current statistical errors.
-
Full Nonlinear Velocity Reconstruction With Transformer and Ensemble Tree Machine Learning
Transformer and GBDT models trained on AbacusSummit mocks for DESI LRGs/ELGs recover nonlinear velocity power spectra and cross-correlations better than linear theory across a wider range of scales, with applications ...
-
Wasserstein Distance in Cosmological Structure Formation: An Optimal Transport Perspective
The squared Wasserstein distance between the initial density field and an observed galaxy catalog is approximately the integral of the matter power spectrum plus a correlation-function integral plus a Poisson shot-noise term.
-
Tsallis-Cirto Hubble parameter: Explaining DESI data and High redshift Supermassive Black Hole
A multi-frame FLRW model for cosmic fluids produces an alternative Hubble parameter consistent with DESI DR2 BAO and CC data up to z<2.33 while providing sufficient time for high-redshift SMBH formation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.