arxiv: 2604.14653 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

Closing the Observational Gap in Cosmic Dynamics: AI-Enabled Reconstruction of the Universe's Vorticity and Rotational Flow Morphology

Ziyong Wu , Xu Xiao , Fuyu Dong , Juhan Kim , Yan-Chuan Cai , Yang Wang , Xi Kang , Le Zhang

show 2 more authors

Xin Wang Xiao-Dong Li

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

keywords cosmic vorticityvelocity reconstructionlarge-scale structureredshift-space distortionsstructure formationartificial intelligencecosmic web

0 comments

The pith

An AI model trained on simulations reconstructs the three-dimensional velocity and vorticity fields from galaxy observations, revealing coherent vortical structures consistent with the concordance cosmological model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to close the long-standing observational gap in cosmic dynamics by recovering the vorticity field, which traces nonlinear structure formation but has been inaccessible due to difficulties measuring transverse motions and modeling shell-crossing. A sympathetic reader would care because this provides an independent empirical window into rotational flows across clusters, filaments, and voids, plus a way to correct for redshift-space distortions and test the underlying model through power spectra and cosmic web morphology. The approach applies an artificial intelligence framework to map observed galaxies to full three-dimensional fields, producing structures that align with density-based maps and yield nearly isotropic clustering signals. If correct, these results supply converging evidence that reinforces the standard picture of structure formation from an otherwise unobservable perspective.

Core claim

The central claim is that the recovered three-dimensional velocity and vorticity fields exhibit coherent vortical structures such as spiral flows in clusters, filaments, and voids. The cosmic web morphology inferred from vorticity closely matches that obtained from density segmentation. Power spectra of the reconstructed fields agree statistically with predictions from the concordance model, and the velocity field removes redshift-space distortions to produce an almost isotropic clustering signal.

What carries the argument

The artificial intelligence framework that takes galaxy observations as input and outputs reconstructed three-dimensional velocity and vorticity fields.

If this is right

Coherent vortical structures including spiral flows appear across clusters, filaments, and voids.
The cosmic web morphology derived from vorticity aligns with that from density segmentation.
Power spectra of the reconstructed velocity and vorticity fields match statistical predictions from the concordance model.
The inferred velocity field corrects redshift-space distortions to yield nearly isotropic clustering.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Retraining the same framework on simulations from alternative models could test whether the reconstruction remains consistent or reveals differences in rotational flows.
Combining these reconstructed fields with future higher-precision surveys might enable direct comparisons against independent velocity measurements.
The method suggests a route to incorporate rotational information into studies of how galaxies form and evolve within the cosmic web.

Load-bearing premise

The AI model trained exclusively on simulations of the concordance cosmological model can accurately recover the true vorticity field in the real universe without inheriting biases from the assumed cosmology or simulation artifacts.

What would settle it

A clear mismatch between the reconstructed power spectra and the expected shape from the concordance model, or persistent anisotropic clustering signals after applying the velocity correction, would show that the reconstruction does not capture the actual dynamics.

read the original abstract

The cosmic vorticity field, an essential tracer of nonlinear structure formation, has remained observationally inaccessible because transverse galaxy motions are difficult to measure and analytic models struggle to capture shell-crossing. Here we report an empirical reconstruction of this field by applying an artificial intelligence framework trained on simulations of the concordance LambdaCDM model to Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies. The recovered three-dimensional velocity and vorticity fields reveal coherent vortical structures, including spiral flows in clusters, filaments, and voids, and the cosmic web inferred from vorticity closely matches that derived from density segmentation. The power spectra of the reconstructed velocity and vorticity fields agree statistically with LambdaCDM predictions, and the inferred velocity field effectively removes redshift-space distortions, yielding an almost isotropic clustering signal. These converging lines of evidence, obtained from an independent perspective, reinforce the concordance cosmological model. By closing a long-standing observational gap, our results highlight the potential of AI-driven reconstruction to access otherwise unobservable quantities and to address fundamental questions in cosmology and galaxy formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The AI reconstruction of cosmic vorticity from SDSS galaxies is a new angle on an old gap, but the LambdaCDM agreement is circular by construction.

read the letter

The paper trains an AI on LambdaCDM N-body simulations to turn galaxy positions into 3D velocity and vorticity fields, then runs it on SDSS data. It reports coherent vortical flows in clusters, filaments, and voids, plus a vorticity-based cosmic web that lines up with density segmentation. The reconstructed velocity field also appears to remove redshift-space distortions and produce nearly isotropic clustering. Those are the concrete outputs that stand out as new work. Prior literature has not delivered an empirical 3D vorticity map from real galaxy catalogs in this way, so the application itself is fresh even if machine-learning reconstruction has been tried on other fields before. The method does deliver visible structures and a practical way to handle transverse motions that analytic models miss. That part is worth looking at if you care about velocity fields or the cosmic web. The main weakness is the training setup. Everything the model learns comes from LambdaCDM simulations, so when the output power spectra and web morphology match LambdaCDM predictions, that match is expected rather than independent. The abstract gives no tests on alternative cosmologies, no held-out physics runs, and no quantitative checks for simulation artifacts or error bars. Without those, the claim that the results reinforce the concordance model from an independent perspective does not hold. The circularity is load-bearing for the strongest conclusions. This is aimed at cosmologists who work on reconstruction techniques or galaxy dynamics. Someone already following AI applications in large-scale structure might pick up the method and try to improve the validation. It is not ready for broad citation yet because of the missing cross-checks. I would send it to peer review. The core idea addresses a real observational limit and the authors have produced actual maps from data, so referees can ask for the necessary tests on other models and clearer error analysis. A revised version could be useful.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an AI framework trained exclusively on LambdaCDM N-body simulations to reconstruct three-dimensional velocity and vorticity fields from SDSS galaxy positions. It reports discovery of coherent vortical structures (including spirals in clusters, filaments, and voids), a vorticity-derived cosmic web matching density segmentation, power spectra of the reconstructed fields in statistical agreement with LambdaCDM predictions, and effective removal of redshift-space distortions yielding nearly isotropic clustering; these are presented as converging, independent evidence reinforcing the concordance cosmological model.

Significance. If the reconstruction can be shown to be robust against training assumptions and simulation artifacts, the method would provide a valuable empirical route to an otherwise inaccessible observable (cosmic vorticity), with potential to address questions in nonlinear structure formation and galaxy dynamics. The AI-driven approach is technically innovative, but its significance is currently constrained by the absence of controls demonstrating independence from the assumed cosmology.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the results constitute 'converging lines of evidence, obtained from an independent perspective' that 'reinforce the concordance cosmological model' is undermined by the training procedure. Because the model is trained solely on LambdaCDM simulations, any reconstructed power spectra, web morphology, or RSD-corrected clustering will be pulled toward the training distribution by construction; this renders the reported statistical agreement a consistency check internal to LambdaCDM rather than independent confirmation.
[Abstract] Abstract and training description: no quantitative details, error bars, cross-validation metrics, or artifact-control tests are supplied for the claimed statistical agreement of velocity/vorticity power spectra or for the RSD removal. Explicit tests on held-out simulations from alternative cosmologies (or with varied physics) are required to establish that the output is not dominated by learned simulation priors.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrases 'coherent vortical structures' and 'spiral flows' would benefit from brief operational definitions or references to the identification algorithm used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments highlight important caveats regarding the dependence on the training cosmology and the need for more explicit validation metrics. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and acknowledge limitations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the results constitute 'converging lines of evidence, obtained from an independent perspective' that 'reinforce the concordance cosmological model' is undermined by the training procedure. Because the model is trained solely on LambdaCDM simulations, any reconstructed power spectra, web morphology, or RSD-corrected clustering will be pulled toward the training distribution by construction; this renders the reported statistical agreement a consistency check internal to LambdaCDM rather than independent confirmation.

Authors: We agree that the original abstract phrasing overstated the degree of independence. The reconstruction framework learns the position-to-velocity/vorticity mapping exclusively from LambdaCDM N-body simulations, so the outputs necessarily reflect features of the training distribution. The application to SDSS data nevertheless yields an empirical map of an otherwise unobservable field, and the subsequent statistical agreement with LambdaCDM expectations constitutes a non-trivial consistency test of the model on real observations. We have revised the abstract to replace 'independent perspective' with 'data-driven reconstruction trained on LambdaCDM simulations' and to describe the results as providing 'supporting consistency with the concordance model' rather than independent reinforcement. These changes preserve the scientific contribution while removing the misleading implication of full independence. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and training description: no quantitative details, error bars, cross-validation metrics, or artifact-control tests are supplied for the claimed statistical agreement of velocity/vorticity power spectra or for the RSD removal. Explicit tests on held-out simulations from alternative cosmologies (or with varied physics) are required to establish that the output is not dominated by learned simulation priors.

Authors: Quantitative power-spectrum comparisons with bootstrap-derived error bars, cross-validation accuracy on held-out LambdaCDM test volumes, and the measured reduction in redshift-space anisotropy (via the quadrupole of the two-point correlation function) are reported in Sections 3.2 and 4.2 together with supplementary figures. We did not, however, perform reconstruction tests on simulations drawn from alternative cosmologies, as generating and storing such suites lies outside the computational scope of the present study. We have added a new paragraph in the Discussion section that explicitly states this limitation, quantifies the expected sensitivity to training priors based on resolution-variation tests already performed within LambdaCDM, and outlines a roadmap for future multi-cosmology validation. Artifact-control tests against changes in simulation resolution, box size, and initial-condition phases are now summarized in the Methods and Supplementary Material. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

AI model trained exclusively on LambdaCDM simulations produces reconstructed fields whose statistics match LambdaCDM by construction

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"Here we report an empirical reconstruction of this field by applying an artificial intelligence framework trained on simulations of the concordance LambdaCDM model to Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies. ... The power spectra of the reconstructed velocity and vorticity fields agree statistically with LambdaCDM predictions, and the inferred velocity field effectively removes redshift-space distortions, yielding an almost isotropic clustering signal. These converging lines of evidence, obtained from an independent perspective, reinforce the concordance cosmological model."

The AI learns the position-to-velocity/vorticity mapping exclusively from LambdaCDM simulations. When deployed on real data the reconstructed fields' power spectra and isotropy are pulled toward the training distribution by construction, rendering the reported statistical agreement and 'reinforcement' of LambdaCDM a tautological consistency check rather than independent evidence.

full rationale

The paper trains an AI framework solely on LambdaCDM N-body simulations to learn the mapping from galaxy positions to 3D velocity and vorticity fields, then applies it to SDSS data and reports that the resulting power spectra agree with LambdaCDM predictions while removing RSD to yield isotropic clustering. This agreement is not an independent test but a direct consequence of the supervised training distribution; the model is optimized to reproduce LambdaCDM-like fields, so any output statistics are statistically forced toward the training cosmology. The abstract's claim of 'converging lines of evidence, obtained from an independent perspective' that 'reinforce the concordance cosmological model' therefore reduces to an internal consistency check rather than external confirmation. No cross-checks against alternative cosmologies or held-out physics are described, confirming the circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that LambdaCDM simulations capture the relevant physics and that the trained AI generalizes to real observations without bias.

free parameters (1)

AI model parameters
Neural network weights and hyperparameters are fitted during training on the simulations.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The concordance LambdaCDM model accurately describes the universe for generating the training simulations.
The AI framework is explicitly trained on simulations of the concordance LambdaCDM model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 1456 out tokens · 109263 ms · 2026-05-10T10:33:08.508466+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Matravers,Steven Weinberg: Cosmology

D. Matravers,Steven Weinberg: Cosmology. Oxford University Press, 2008, 544p., GBP45.00, ISBN13: 978-0-19-852682-7,General Relativity and Gravitation41(2009) 1455

2008
[2]

Peebles,Principles of Physical Cosmology(1993), 10.1515/9780691206721

P.J.E. Peebles,Principles of Physical Cosmology(1993), 10.1515/9780691206721

work page doi:10.1515/9780691206721 1993
[3]

Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution

V. Springel, S.D.M. White, A. Jenkins, C.S. Frenk, N. Yoshida, L. Gao et al.,Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars,Nat. Astron.435(2005) 629 [astro-ph/0504097]

work page Pith review arXiv 2005
[4]

White and M.J

S.D.M. White and M.J. Rees,Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering.,MNRAS183(1978) 341

1978
[5]

Phillips,The Absolute Magnitudes of Type IA Supernovae,ApJ Lett.413(1993) L105

M.M. Phillips,The Absolute Magnitudes of Type IA Supernovae,ApJ Lett.413(1993) L105

1993
[6]

Riess, M

A.G. Riess, M. Davis, J. Baker and R.P. Kirshner,The Velocity Field from Type IA Supernovae Matches the Gravity Field from Galaxy Surveys,ApJ Lett.488(1997) L1 [astro-ph/9707261]

work page arXiv 1997
[7]

Radburn-Smith, J.R

D.J. Radburn-Smith, J.R. Lucey and M.J. Hudson,A comparison of local Type Ia supernovae with the IRAS PSCz gravity field,MNRAS355(2004) 1378 [astro-ph/0409551]. – 14 –

work page arXiv 2004
[8]

Turnbull, M.J

S.J. Turnbull, M.J. Hudson, H.A. Feldman, M. Hicken, R.P. Kirshner and R. Watkins,Cosmic flows in the nearby universe from Type Ia supernovae,MNRAS420(2012) 447 [1111.0631]

work page arXiv 2012
[9]

Mathews, B.M

G.J. Mathews, B.M. Rose, P.M. Garnavich, D.G. Yamazaki and T. Kajino,Detectability of Cosmic Dark Flow in the Type Ia Supernova Redshift–Distance Relation,ApJ827(2016) 60 [1412.1529]

work page arXiv 2016
[10]

Tully and J.R

R.B. Tully and J.R. Fisher,Reprint of 1977A&A....54..661T. A new method of determining distance to galaxies.,A&A500(1977) 105

1977
[11]

Masters, C.M

K.L. Masters, C.M. Springob, M.P. Haynes and R. Giovanelli,SFI++ I: A New I-Band Tully-Fisher Template, the Cluster Peculiar Velocity Dispersion, and H 0,ApJ653(2006) 861 [astro-ph/0609249]

work page arXiv 2006
[12]

Masters, C.M

K.L. Masters, C.M. Springob and J.P. Huchra,2MTF. I. The Tully-Fisher Relation in the Two Micron All Sky Survey J, H, and K Bands,AJ135(2008) 1738 [0711.4305]

work page arXiv 2008
[13]

Dressler, D

A. Dressler, D. Lynden-Bell, D. Burstein, R.L. Davies, S.M. Faber, R. Terlevich et al., Spectroscopy and Photometry of Elliptical Galaxies. I. New Distance Estimator,ApJ313 (1987) 42

1987
[14]

Djorgovski and M

S. Djorgovski and M. Davis,Fundamental Properties of Elliptical Galaxies,ApJ313(1987) 59

1987
[15]

Springob, K.L

C.M. Springob, K.L. Masters, M.P. Haynes, R. Giovanelli and C. Marinoni,SFI++. II. A New I-Band Tully-Fisher Catalog, Derivation of Peculiar Velocities, and Data Set Properties,ApJS 172(2007) 599

2007
[16]

Jackson,A critique of rees’s theory of primordial gravitational radiation,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society156(1972) 1P

J. Jackson,A critique of rees’s theory of primordial gravitational radiation,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society156(1972) 1P

1972
[17]

Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space,MNRAS227(1987) 1

N. Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space,MNRAS227(1987) 1

1987
[18]

Alcock and B

C. Alcock and B. Paczy´ nski,An evolution free test for non-zero cosmological constant,Nature 281(1979) 358

1979
[19]

X.-D. Li, C. Park, J.E. Forero-Romero and J. Kim,Cosmological Constraints from the Redshift Dependence of the Alcock-Paczynski Test: Galaxy Density Gradient Field,ApJ796(2014) 137 [1412.3564]

work page arXiv 2014
[20]

X.-D. Li, C. Park, C.G. Sabiu and J. Kim,Cosmological constraints from the redshift dependence of the alcock–paczynski test and volume effect: galaxy two-point correlation function,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society450(2015) 807

2015
[21]

X.-D. Li, C. Park, C.G. Sabiu, H. Park, D.H. Weinberg, D.P. Schneider et al.,Cosmological Constraints from the Redshift Dependence of the Alcock-Paczynski Effect: Application to the SDSS-III BOSS DR12 Galaxies,ApJ832(2016) 103 [1609.05476]

work page arXiv 2016
[22]

Cosmological inference from Bayesian forward modelling of deep galaxy redshift surveys

D.K. Ramanah, G. Lavaux, J. Jasche and B.D. Wandelt,Cosmological inference from Bayesian forward modelling of deep galaxy redshift surveys,A&A621(2019) A69 [1808.07496]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[23]

Sunyaev and Y.B

R.A. Sunyaev and Y.B. Zeldovich,The Observations of Relic Radiation as a Test of the Nature of X-Ray Radiation from the Clusters of Galaxies,Comments on Astrophysics and Space Physics4(1972) 173

1972
[24]

Sunyaev and Y.B

R.A. Sunyaev and Y.B. Zeldovich,The velocity of clusters of galaxies relative to the microwave background - The possibility of its measurement.,MNRAS190(1980) 413

1980
[25]

Sachs and A.M

R.K. Sachs and A.M. Wolfe,Perturbations of a Cosmological Model and Angular Variations of the Microwave Background,ApJ147(1967) 73

1967
[26]

Rees and D.W

M.J. Rees and D.W. Sciama,Large-scale Density Inhomogeneities in the Universe,Nat. Astron.217(1968) 511

1968
[27]

Crittenden and N

R.G. Crittenden and N. Turok,Looking for a Cosmological Constant with the Rees-Sciama Effect,Phys. Rev. Lett.76(1996) 575 [astro-ph/9510072]. – 15 –

work page arXiv 1996
[28]

Gramann, N.A

M. Gramann, N.A. Bahcall, R. Cen and J.R. Gott,Large-Scale Motions in the Universe: Using Clusters of Galaxies as Tracers,ApJ441(1995) 449

1995
[29]

Strauss and J.A

M.A. Strauss and J.A. Willick,The density and peculiar velocity fields of nearby galaxies,Phys. Rep.261(1995) 271 [astro-ph/9502079]

work page arXiv 1995
[30]

Hahn, R.E

O. Hahn, R.E. Angulo and T. Abel,The properties of cosmic velocity fields,MNRAS454 (2015) 3920 [1404.2280]

work page arXiv 2015
[31]

Libeskind, Y

N.I. Libeskind, Y. Hoffman, M. Steinmetz, S. Gottl¨ ober, A. Knebe and S. Hess,Cosmic Vorticity and the Origin Halo Spins,ApJ Lett.766(2013) L15 [1212.1454]

work page arXiv 2013
[33]

Kitaura and T.A

F.S. Kitaura and T.A. Enßlin,Bayesian reconstruction of the cosmological large-scale structure: methodology, inverse algorithms and numerical optimization,MNRAS389(2008) 497 [0705.0429]

work page arXiv 2008
[34]

Nusser, A

A. Nusser, A. Dekel, E. Bertschinger and G.R. Blumenthal,Cosmological Velocity-Density Relation in the Quasi-linear Regime,ApJ379(1991) 6

1991
[35]

Bernardeau,The Quasi-Gaussian Density-Velocity Relationship,ApJ Lett.390(1992) L61

F. Bernardeau,The Quasi-Gaussian Density-Velocity Relationship,ApJ Lett.390(1992) L61

1992
[36]

Nusser and M

A. Nusser and M. Davis,On the Prediction of Velocity Fields from Redshift Space Galaxy Samples,ApJ Lett.421(1994) L1 [astro-ph/9309009]

work page arXiv 1994
[37]

Zaroubi, Y

S. Zaroubi, Y. Hoffman, K.B. Fisher and O. Lahav,Wiener Reconstruction of the Large-Scale Structure,ApJ449(1995) 446 [astro-ph/9410080]

work page arXiv 1995
[38]

Croft and E

R.A.C. Croft and E. Gaztanaga,Reconstruction of cosmological density and velocity fields in the Lagrangian Zel’dovich approximation,MNRAS285(1997) 793 [astro-ph/9602100]

work page arXiv 1997
[39]

Bernardeau, M.J

F. Bernardeau, M.J. Chodorowski, E.L. Lokas, R. Stompor and A. Kudlicki,Non-linearity and stochasticity in the density-velocity relation,MNRAS309(1999) 543 [astro-ph/9901057]

work page arXiv 1999
[40]

Kudlicki, M

A. Kudlicki, M. Chodorowski, T. Plewa and M. R´ o˙ zyczka,Reconstructing cosmic peculiar velocities from the mildly non-linear density field,MNRAS316(2000) 464 [astro-ph/9910018]

work page arXiv 2000
[41]

Branchini, A

E. Branchini, A. Eldar and A. Nusser,Peculiar velocity reconstruction with the fast action method: tests on mock redshift surveys,MNRAS335(2002) 53 [astro-ph/0110618]

work page arXiv 2002
[42]

Mohayaee and R.B

R. Mohayaee and R.B. Tully,The Cosmological Mean Density and Its Local Variations Probed by Peculiar Velocities,ApJ Lett.635(2005) L113 [astro-ph/0509313]

work page arXiv 2005
[43]

Lavaux, R

G. Lavaux, R. Mohayaee, S. Colombi, R.B. Tully, F. Bernardeau and J. Silk,Observational biases in Lagrangian reconstructions of cosmic velocity fields,MNRAS383(2008) 1292 [0707.3483]

work page arXiv 2008
[44]

Bilicki and M.J

M. Bilicki and M.J. Chodorowski,The velocity-density relation in the spherical model,MNRAS 391(2008) 1796 [0809.3513]

work page arXiv 2008
[45]

Kitaura, R.E

F.-S. Kitaura, R.E. Angulo, Y. Hoffman and S. Gottl¨ ober,Estimating cosmic velocity fields from density fields and tidal tensors,MNRAS425(2012) 2422 [1111.6629]

work page arXiv 2012
[46]

Wang, H.J

H. Wang, H.J. Mo, X. Yang and F.C. van den Bosch,Reconstructing the cosmic velocity and tidal fields with galaxy groups selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,MNRAS420(2012) 1809 [1108.1008]

work page arXiv 2012
[47]

Jennings and D

E. Jennings and D. Jennings,Non-linear stochastic growth rates and redshift space distortions, MNRAS449(2015) 3407 [1502.02052]. – 16 –

work page arXiv 2015
[48]

Ata, F.-S

M. Ata, F.-S. Kitaura, C.-H. Chuang, S. Rodr´ ıguez-Torres, R.E. Angulo, S. Ferraro et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmic flows and cosmic web from luminous red galaxies,MNRAS467(2017) 3993 [1605.09745]

work page arXiv 2017
[49]

Physical Bayesian modelling of the non-linear matter distribution: new insights into the Nearby Universe

J. Jasche and G. Lavaux,Physical Bayesian modelling of the non-linear matter distribution: New insights into the nearby universe,A&A625(2019) A64 [1806.11117]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[50]

Bayesian physical reconstruction of initial conditions from large scale structure surveys

J. Jasche and B.D. Wandelt,Bayesian physical reconstruction of initial conditions from large-scale structure surveys,MNRAS432(2013) 894 [1203.3639]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[51]

The Coyote Universe II: Cosmological Models and Precision Emulation of the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum

K. Heitmann, D. Higdon, M. White, S. Habib, B.J. Williams, E. Lawrence et al.,The Coyote Universe. II. Cosmological Models and Precision Emulation of the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum,ApJ705(2009) 156 [0902.0429]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[52]

Wang, H.J

H. Wang, H.J. Mo, X. Yang, Y. Zhang, J. Shi, Y.P. Jing et al.,ELUCID - Exploring the Local Universe with ReConstructed Initial Density Field III: Constrained Simulation in the SDSS Volume,ApJ831(2016) 164 [1608.01763]

work page arXiv 2016
[53]

Z. Wu, Z. Zhang, S. Pan, H. Miao, X. Luo, X. Wang et al.,Cosmic Velocity Field Reconstruction Using AI,ApJ913(2021) 2 [2105.09450]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

Z. Wu, L. Xiao, X. Xiao, J. Wang, X. Kang, Y. Wang et al.,AI-assisted reconstruction of cosmic velocity field from redshift-space spatial distribution of haloes,MNRAS522(2023) 4748 [2301.04586]

work page arXiv 2023
[55]

H. Chen, J. Wang, T. Mao, J. Ma, Y. Meng, B. Li et al.,Estimation of line-of-sight velocities of individual galaxies using neural networks - I. Modelling redshift-space distortions at large scales,MNRAS532(2024) 3947 [2312.03469]

work page arXiv 2024
[56]

Wang and X

Y. Wang and X. Yang,Peculiar Velocity Reconstruction from Simulations and Observations Using Deep Learning Algorithms,ApJ969(2024) 76 [2406.14101]

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

Peebles,The large-scale structure of the universe(1980)

P.J.E. Peebles,The large-scale structure of the universe(1980)

1980
[58]

Large-Scale Structure of the Universe and Cosmological Perturbation Theory

F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gazta˜ naga and R. Scoccimarro,Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory,Phys. Rep.367(2002) 1 [astro-ph/0112551]

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[59]

Generation of Vorticity and Velocity Dispersion by Orbit Crossing

S. Pueblas and R. Scoccimarro,Generation of Vorticity and Velocity Dispersion by Orbit Crossing,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 043504 [0809.4606]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[60]

Umeh,Vorticity generation in cosmology and the role of shell crossing,JCAP12(2023) 043, [arXiv:2303.08782]

O. Umeh,Vorticity generation in cosmology and the role of shell crossing,JCAP12(2023) 043 [2303.08782]

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

Choi, D.-H

Y.-Y. Choi, D.-H. Han and S.-S.S. Kim,Korea Institute for Advanced Study Value-Added Galaxy Catalog,Journal of Korean Astronomical Society43(2010) 191

2010
[62]

Blanton, D.J

M.R. Blanton, D.J. Schlegel, M.A. Strauss, J. Brinkmann, D. Finkbeiner, M. Fukugita et al., New York University Value-Added Galaxy Catalog: A Galaxy Catalog Based on New Public Surveys,AJ129(2005) 2562 [astro-ph/0410166]

work page arXiv 2005
[63]

N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

K.N. Abazajian, J.K. Adelman-McCarthy, M.A. Ag¨ ueros, S.S. Allam, C. Allende Prieto, D. An et al.,The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,ApJS182(2009) 543 [0812.0649]

work page arXiv 2009
[64]

F. Dong, C. Park, S.E. Hong, J. Kim, H.S. Hwang, H. Park et al.,Tomographic Alcock-Paczy´ nski Test with Redshift-space Correlation Function: Evidence for the Dark Energy Equation-of-state Parameter w ¿ -1,ApJ953(2023) 98 [2305.00206]

work page arXiv 2023
[65]

J. Kim, C. Park, B. L’Huillier and S.E. Hong,Horizon Run 4 Simulation: Coupled Evolution of Galaxies and Large-Scale Structures of the Universe,Journal of Korean Astronomical Society 48(2015) 213 [1508.05107]. – 17 –

work page arXiv 2015
[66]

Vale and J.P

A. Vale and J.P. Ostriker,Linking halo mass to galaxy luminosity,MNRAS353(2004) 189 [astro-ph/0402500]

work page arXiv 2004
[67]

Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

D.P. Kingma and J. Ba,Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,arXiv e-prints(2014) arXiv:1412.6980 [1412.6980]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[69]

X. Luo, X. Xu and X. Wang,On the kinematic morphology around haloes,MNRAS518(2023) 6059 [2209.06488]

work page arXiv 2023
[70]

X. Wang, A. Szalay, M.A. Arag´ on-Calvo, M.C. Neyrinck and G.L. Eyink,Kinematic Morphology of Large-scale Structure: Evolution from Potential to Rotational Flow,ApJ793 (2014) 58 [1309.5305]. – 18 –

work page arXiv 2014