pith. sign in

arxiv: hep-lat/9907021 · v1 · pith:LF3PQ6VJnew · submitted 1999-07-27 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-th

Vortex Structure vs. Monopole Dominance in Abelian-Projected Gauge Theory

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-th
keywords abelian-projectedlatticemonopoledominancefindgaugelinesstructure
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We find that Polyakov lines, computed in abelian-projected SU(2) lattice gauge theory in the confined phase, have finite expectation values for lines corresponding to two units of the abelian electric charge. This means that the abelian-projected lattice has at most Z(2), rather than U(1), global symmetry. We also find a severe breakdown of the monopole dominance approximation, as well as positivity, in this charge-2 case. These results imply that the abelian-projected lattice is not adequately represented by a monopole Coulomb gas; the data is, however, consistent with a center vortex structure. Further evidence is provided, in lattice Monte Carlo simulations, for collimation of confining color-magnetic flux into vortices.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Monopoles, Center Vortices, Confinement in (3+1)d, and the Lens-Space Twisted Partition Function

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Proposes torus and lens-space twisted partition functions as criteria for center-vortex and monopole condensation and proves vortex condensation implies monopole condensation in gapped phases.