Comment on the Generation Number in Orbifold Compactifications
classification
✦ hep-th
keywords
numbercompactificationsorbifoldsomewhenanswerbeenbyproduct
read the original abstract
There has been some confusion concerning the number of $(1,1)$-forms in orbifold compactifications of the heterotic string in numerous publications. In this note we point out the relevance of the underlying torus lattice on this number. We answer the question when different lattices mimic the same physics and when this is not the case. As a byproduct we classify all symmetric $Z_N$-orbifolds with $(2,2)$ world sheet supersymmetry obtaining also some new ones.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A note on the holographic consistency of DGKT-type vacua with $h^{2,1}=0$
Cancellations that satisfy a holographic three-point function constraint in DGKT vacua persist across examples with h^{2,1}=0 and more complicated triple-intersection numbers.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.