REVIEW 3 cited by
An efficient algorithm to recognize local Clifford equivalence of graph states
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
An efficient algorithm to recognize local Clifford equivalence of graph states
read the original abstract
In [Phys. Rev. A 69, 022316 (2004)] we presented a description of the action of local Clifford operations on graph states in terms of a graph transformation rule, known in graph theory as \emph{local complementation}. It was shown that two graph states are equivalent under the local Clifford group if and only if there exists a sequence of local complementations which relates their associated graphs. In this short note we report the existence of a polynomial time algorithm, published in [Combinatorica 11 (4), 315 (1991)], which decides whether two given graphs are related by a sequence of local complementations. Hence an efficient algorithm to detect local Clifford equivalence of graph states is obtained.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Local Equivalences of Graph States
Graph states are LU-equivalent if and only if they are linked by r-local complementations for some integer r; LU-equivalence is decidable in quasi-polynomial time, and LU=LC holds on at most 19 qubits.
-
The Structure of Circle Graph States
Circle graphs are closed under r-local complementation and bipartite circle graph states correspond one-to-one with planar code states whose MBQC is classically simulable.
-
Adaptive Framework for Failure-Aware Protocols in Fusion-Based Graph-State Generation
Adaptive reuse of partially built graph states after failed fusion measurements, combined with graph-theoretic ordering, can cut expected fusion overhead by orders of magnitude relative to repeat-until-success.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.