REVIEW 2 cited by
Local unitary versus local Clifford equivalence of stabilizer states
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Local unitary versus local Clifford equivalence of stabilizer states
read the original abstract
We study the relation between local unitary (LU) equivalence and local Clifford (LC) equivalence of stabilizer states. We introduce a large subclass of stabilizer states, such that every two LU equivalent states in this class are necessarily LC equivalent. Together with earlier results, this shows that LC, LU and SLOCC equivalence are the same notions for this class of stabilizer states. Moreover, recognizing whether two given stabilizer states in the present subclass are locally equivalent only requires a polynomial number of operations in the number of qubits.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Local Equivalences of Graph States
Graph states are LU-equivalent if and only if they are linked by r-local complementations for some integer r; LU-equivalence is decidable in quasi-polynomial time, and LU=LC holds on at most 19 qubits.
-
The Structure of Circle Graph States
Circle graphs are closed under r-local complementation and bipartite circle graph states correspond one-to-one with planar code states whose MBQC is classically simulable.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.