Psychological safety increases and evaluation apprehension decreases university students' willingness to disclose AI use, with fairness, support, stigma, uncertainty, and privacy as key drivers.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Psychological safety raises and fear of negative evaluation lowers EAP students' intention to disclose generative AI use in academic writing.
Self-reported LLM usage frequency associates more consistently with pre-instruction AI perceptions than prior education or self-rated familiarity in graduate trainees.
citing papers explorer
-
Enabling and Inhibitory Pathways of University Students' Willingness to Disclose AI Use: A Cognition-Affect-Conation Perspective
Psychological safety increases and evaluation apprehension decreases university students' willingness to disclose AI use, with fairness, support, stigma, uncertainty, and privacy as key drivers.
-
Examining EAP Students' AI Disclosure Intention: A Cognition-Affect-Conation Perspective
Psychological safety raises and fear of negative evaluation lowers EAP students' intention to disclose generative AI use in academic writing.
-
Engagement Intensity as a Learner-Modeling Signal for Adaptive AI Ethics Instruction
Self-reported LLM usage frequency associates more consistently with pre-instruction AI perceptions than prior education or self-rated familiarity in graduate trainees.