LLM chain-of-thought crosses a commitment boundary early; subsequent steps are epiphenomenal, enabling early-exit that shortens traces 55% with negligible performance change.
Improving Dialect Robustness in Large Language Models via L o RA and Mixture-of-Experts
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4representative citing papers
ACTS models LLM reasoning control as an MDP solved by a controller agent initialized on synthetic multi-budget trajectories and refined with budget-conditioned RL, achieving token savings while matching full-reasoning accuracy.
SEMJ is a self-evolving multilingual LLM judge that turns cross-lingual inconsistency into iterative self-reflection, outperforming voting and reflection baselines on accuracy and consistency.
The paper introduces a three-source decomposition showing that answer flips in multi-agent LLM debate include 37% spontaneous instability and 29% harmful conformity, with even vacuous reasoning persuading 20-39% of resistant agents and interventions reducing harmful conformity by 13.6 points.
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond the Commitment Boundary: Probing Epiphenomenal Chain-of-Thought in Large Reasoning Models
LLM chain-of-thought crosses a commitment boundary early; subsequent steps are epiphenomenal, enabling early-exit that shortens traces 55% with negligible performance change.
-
Agentic Chain-of-Thought Steering for Efficient and Controllable LLM Reasoning
ACTS models LLM reasoning control as an MDP solved by a controller agent initialized on synthetic multi-budget trajectories and refined with budget-conditioned RL, achieving token savings while matching full-reasoning accuracy.
-
When Languages Disagree: Self-Evolving Multilingual LLM Judges
SEMJ is a self-evolving multilingual LLM judge that turns cross-lingual inconsistency into iterative self-reflection, outperforming voting and reflection baselines on accuracy and consistency.
-
Not All Flips Are Conformity: Decomposing Stance Convergence in Multi-Agent LLM Debate
The paper introduces a three-source decomposition showing that answer flips in multi-agent LLM debate include 37% spontaneous instability and 29% harmful conformity, with even vacuous reasoning persuading 20-39% of resistant agents and interventions reducing harmful conformity by 13.6 points.