pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

Title resolution pending

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 1 cs.CL 1

years

2026 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?

cs.AI · 2026-04-26 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

AI peer review systems are vulnerable to prompt injections, prestige biases, assertion strength effects, and contextual poisoning, as demonstrated by a new attack taxonomy and causal experiments on real conference submissions.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • Is It Novel and Why? Fine-Grained Patent Novelty Prediction Based on Passage Retrieval cs.CL · 2026-05-04 · unverdicted · none · ref 45

    Introduces a feature-level annotated patent dataset and LLM retrieval-reasoning workflows that outperform embedding baselines on passage retrieval and novel feature identification while avoiding spurious correlations in novelty prediction.

  • When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee? cs.AI · 2026-04-26 · unverdicted · none · ref 41

    AI peer review systems are vulnerable to prompt injections, prestige biases, assertion strength effects, and contextual poisoning, as demonstrated by a new attack taxonomy and causal experiments on real conference submissions.