pith. sign in

Generating Literature-Driven Scientific Theories at Scale

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Contemporary automated scientific discovery has focused on agents for generating scientific experiments, while systems that perform higher-level scientific activities such as theory building remain underexplored. In this work, we formulate the problem of synthesizing theories consisting of qualitative and quantitative laws from large corpora of scientific literature. We study theory generation at scale, using 13.7k source papers to synthesize 2.9k theories, examining how generation using literature-grounding versus parametric knowledge, and accuracy-focused versus novelty-focused generation objectives change theory properties. Our experiments show that, compared to using parametric LLM memory for generation, our literature-supported method creates theories that are significantly better at both matching existing evidence and at predicting future results from 4.6k subsequently-written papers

fields

cs.AI 1 cs.LG 1

years

2026 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

representative citing papers

Evidence-Informed LLM Beliefs for Continual Scientific Discovery

cs.AI · 2026-06-28 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Evidence-informed belief updates make Bayesian surprise non-stationary in LLM hypothesis search, with embedding-based RAG identifying 37.5% spurious static surprisals and modified search (filtering plus diversity) yielding 30.62% higher accumulated non-stationary surprisal across five domains.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • Evidence-Informed LLM Beliefs for Continual Scientific Discovery cs.AI · 2026-06-28 · unverdicted · none · ref 18 · internal anchor

    Evidence-informed belief updates make Bayesian surprise non-stationary in LLM hypothesis search, with embedding-based RAG identifying 37.5% spurious static surprisals and modified search (filtering plus diversity) yielding 30.62% higher accumulated non-stationary surprisal across five domains.

  • LLM-AutoSciLab: Closed-Loop Scientific Discovery via Active Experimentation with LLMs cs.LG · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · none · ref 20 · internal anchor

    LLM-AutoSciLab proposes an LLM-driven closed-loop system for hypothesis generation and adaptive experiment selection that reports higher accuracy and 2-5x better sample efficiency than baselines on new chemistry and gene-network discovery benchmarks.