AI peer review systems are vulnerable to prompt injections, prestige biases, assertion strength effects, and contextual poisoning, as demonstrated by a new attack taxonomy and causal experiments on real conference submissions.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Data-driven friendliness model for virtual agents improves perceived friendliness by 5.71% and social presence by 4.03% in AR user study with HoloLens integration.
A late-fusion gradient-boosting pipeline with LLM semantic features is submitted to the EXIST 2026 lab for sexism identification in memes and videos, showing mixed generalization from development to test data.
citing papers explorer
-
When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?
AI peer review systems are vulnerable to prompt injections, prestige biases, assertion strength effects, and contextual poisoning, as demonstrated by a new attack taxonomy and causal experiments on real conference submissions.