TTRL gains are reinterpreted as mostly sharpening rather than learning, with an identified extinction window causing net corruption; TTRL-Guard mitigates via FRS, MPS, and RCSU for improved pass@1.
Beyond Majority Voting: Towards Fine-grained and More Reliable Reward Signal for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Test-time reinforcement learning mitigates the reliance on annotated data by using majority voting results as pseudo-labels, emerging as a complementary direction to reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for improving reasoning ability. However, this voting strategy often induces confirmation bias and suffers from sparse rewards, limiting the overall performance. In this work, we propose subgroup-specific step-wise confidence-weighted pseudo-label estimation (SCOPE), a framework integrating model confidence and dynamic subgroup partitioning to address these issues. Specifically, SCOPE integrates the proposed step-wise confidence into pseudo label estimation, prioritizing high-quality reasoning paths over simple frequency count. Furthermore, it dynamically partitions the candidate outputs pool into independent subgroups by balancing reasoning quality against exploration diversity. By deriving local consensus via repeat sampling for each sub group, SCOPE provides diverse supervision targets to encourage broader exploration. We conduct experiments across various models and benchmarks, experimental results show that SCOPE consistently outperforms recent baselines. Notably, SCOPE achieving relative improvements of 13.1% on challenging AIME 2025 and 8.1% on AMC. The code is released at https://github.com/szu-tera/SCOPE.
fields
cs.LG 3years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Probability calibration applied to LLM evaluator judgments reduces preference coupling gamma by 20-49% and Jensen-Shannon divergence by 45-67% in a within-subjects experiment with N=5.
RLAVR uses the Corrective Advantage Gap metric and CARE policy to actively acquire ground-truth labels for key samples, stabilizing RLVR training and boosting performance with limited annotation budgets.
citing papers explorer
-
Detecting and Mitigating the Correct-Answer Extinction Window in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning with Majority Voting
TTRL gains are reinterpreted as mostly sharpening rather than learning, with an identified extinction window causing net corruption; TTRL-Guard mitigates via FRS, MPS, and RCSU for improved pass@1.
-
Calibrating the Evaluator: Does Probability Calibration Mitigate Preference Coupling in LLM Agent Feedback Loops?
Probability calibration applied to LLM evaluator judgments reduces preference coupling gamma by 20-49% and Jensen-Shannon divergence by 45-67% in a within-subjects experiment with N=5.
-
When Self-Belief Misleads: Active Label Acquisition for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
RLAVR uses the Corrective Advantage Gap metric and CARE policy to actively acquire ground-truth labels for key samples, stabilizing RLVR training and boosting performance with limited annotation budgets.