Fine-tuning shows higher proficiency than in-context learning on in-distribution generalization in formal languages, with equal out-of-distribution performance and diverging inductive biases at high proficiency.
Few-shot fine-tuning vs
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
An adaptive test-time framework uses a warm-up phase on the test set to build evolving in-context examples, then concentrates compute on unresolved queries to outperform static baselines on math, coding, and reasoning tasks with lower total inference cost.
citing papers explorer
-
Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning in Large Language Models: A Formal Language Learning Perspective
Fine-tuning shows higher proficiency than in-context learning on in-distribution generalization in formal languages, with equal out-of-distribution performance and diverging inductive biases at high proficiency.
-
Adaptive Test-Time Compute Allocation with Evolving In-Context Demonstrations
An adaptive test-time framework uses a warm-up phase on the test set to build evolving in-context examples, then concentrates compute on unresolved queries to outperform static baselines on math, coding, and reasoning tasks with lower total inference cost.