CLExEval introduces a human-annotated evaluation framework on 40 rare cases that identifies verbosity bias, hidden knowledge paradox, and 68.6% reasoning-to-output mismatch in LLMs while showing LLM-as-a-Judge overestimates reliability.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.CL 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Presents PopMedQA benchmark and shows domain-independent LLM methods fail on token-inefficient longitudinal medical records, leaving room for domain-specific approaches.
citing papers explorer
-
CLExEval: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Qualitative Evaluation of LLM Clinical Reasoning
CLExEval introduces a human-annotated evaluation framework on 40 rare cases that identifies verbosity bias, hidden knowledge paradox, and 68.6% reasoning-to-output mismatch in LLMs while showing LLM-as-a-Judge overestimates reliability.
-
The Verbose Context Problem in Medical Records
Presents PopMedQA benchmark and shows domain-independent LLM methods fail on token-inefficient longitudinal medical records, leaving room for domain-specific approaches.